Merge branch 'main' into feat/pm-agent-issue-to-pr

One conflict, in clusters/base/kustomization.yaml: PR #55 (vpn-ingress) and this branch
both appended a resource line to the same tail. Resolved by keeping BOTH, with main's
vpn-ingress first — it is a platform-config-tier leaf, while pm-agent dependsOn
apps-wave-0, which is later.

Nothing else conflicted. runbooks/kustomization.yaml auto-merged and carries both the
vpn-remote-access and pm-agent entries; the handoff entries are separate files and had
nothing to merge, which is the whole point of decisions/ being a directory.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <[email protected]>

decisions/2026-10-05-agents-work-in-their-own-workspace.md

@@ -0,0 +1,147 @@
+---
+date: 2026-10-05
+branch: docs/agents-work-in-their-own-workspace
+title: One workspace per agent run — the shared checkout is now documented as off-limits
+---
+
+## What changed
+
+Agents have been doing their work in the operator's checkout at
+`/var/home/keith/source/home-network-k3s-impl` and clobbering each other. Nothing in the tree
+told them not to: worktrees appeared in CLAUDE.md only as §3's *gate workarounds*, i.e. as an
+awkward edge case, and `decisions/README.md` asserted worktree isolation as a fact about how
+agents already behave rather than as a rule they must follow. Nowhere was the rule stated.
+
+Documentation only — no code, no manifests, no pipeline logic.
+
+- **`CLAUDE.md`: new `## 0. Work in your OWN workspace. Never in the shared checkout.`**
+  Placed before §1 so the section numbers every other file and handoff entry cites (§1, §2b,
+  §3, §7) all keep their meaning. It gives the three commands (`git fetch origin main`;
+  `git worktree add -b <type>/<slug> <path outside the repo> origin/main`; `cd`), an explicit
+  do-not list for the shared checkout (no `checkout`/`switch`, no edits, no
+  `add`/`commit`/`stash`/`restore`, no removing others' worktrees), a measurement table, the
+  "put it outside the repo root" rule, cleanup, what to do if you are already standing in the
+  shared checkout with edits, and what a PM must put in a brief it writes for another agent.
+- **`CLAUDE.md` intro** now says "Start with §0", with the reason: it is the rule you can
+  break before you have read anything else.
+- **`CLAUDE.md` §3** retitled "Running the gate from a worktree" and reframed as the normal
+  path rather than an edge case, since §0 now makes every gate run a worktree run. Its list
+  grew from two breakages to three: `spec-immutability`'s skip is *avoidable*, not merely
+  tolerated, if the `ENGINE` shim also mounts the sibling spec repo read-only and passes
+  `-e SPEC_REPO=/home-network-k3s`.
+- **`CLAUDE.md` §4** gained "One branch, one workspace, one PR".
+- **`README.md`**: a fourth non-negotiable rule ("No work in a shared checkout"), and
+  "Working on this repo" now opens with how to get out of the checkout before describing the
+  dev container that runs in it.
+- **`decisions/README.md`**: the worktree-isolation sentence now cites §0 as the requirement
+  instead of describing it as something agents happen to do.
+
+I did this work the way the new §0 requires — a worktree at
+`<session scratchpad>/wt-workspace-rule`, outside the repo root, branched from `origin/main`,
+with the shared checkout left on the branch and with the untracked files I found in it.
+
+## What I verified
+
+Every number in the new §0 table was measured in the shared checkout on 2026-10-05, not
+recalled:
+
+| Claim | Command | Value |
+|---|---|---|
+| shared HEAD is yanked between branches | `git reflog \| grep -c 'checkout: moving'` | **107** |
+| it is not sitting on `main` | `git worktree list` | `feat/pm-agent-issue-to-pr` |
+| other runs' uncommitted work is in it | `git status --porcelain` | **2** trees: `infra/agent/` (22:04), `platform/pm-agent/` (22:09) — `stat -c %y` |
+| its `main` is stale | `git rev-parse main` vs `origin/main` | `4386d14` vs `22c94ef`, **2 behind** |
+| worktrees registered / already merged | `git worktree list --porcelain` + `git merge-base --is-ancestor <b> main` | **42** branches, **31** merged |
+| nested worktrees are a gate hazard | `grep -rl '\.claude' conformance/tests platform/monitoring/tests` | **9** scripts carry an explicit exclusion |
+| the 18× double-count | read `platform/monitoring/tests/run.sh:115-123` | in-tree comment, observed 2026-09-12 |
+
+**The failure mode was observed live, mid-session, not just reconstructed.** The two untracked
+trees I measured at 22:04 and 22:09 were committed at 22:20 by another run — `5334abe`
+`feat(pm-agent): an in-cluster AI Program Manager...`, 1,000+ lines across `infra/agent/`,
+`clusters/`, `catalog/`, `apps/`, `docs/plans/` and its own `decisions/` entry — onto the shared
+checkout's checked-out branch. Measured after the fact: the shared checkout's HEAD moved
+`22c94ef` → `5334abe` and its working tree went clean between my first `git status` and my last,
+with `git log -1` naming a commit that is not mine. That is §0's "shared HEAD" row happening
+during the session that wrote §0, and it is now cited in the doc.
+
+**A claim of mine was wrong and is corrected in the doc.** I had it recorded that
+`git worktree remove` is blocked by the agent sandbox. Provoked rather than assumed: created
+a throwaway detached worktree in the scratchpad and removed it — **rc 0**, and
+`git worktree list` no longer shows it. §0 therefore tells agents to remove their own, and
+scopes the "blocked" note to what it actually covers: *other* sessions'
+`.claude/worktrees/agent-*`, some of which are additionally `locked` on git's own terms. The
+`rework/<pr-number>` escape hatch is now scoped to someone else's stale worktree holding a
+branch, which is a real and separate problem (31 of them). Both of my own worktrees in this
+session were removed cleanly at rc 0 after pushing.
+
+`spec-immutability` is avoidable-not-tolerated: taken from
+`decisions/2026-10-01-render-selftest-runs-in-gate.md`, which records
+`stage spec-immutability: pass` under the two-mount shim plus `-e SPEC_REPO=/home-network-k3s`.
+
+**Gate — `rc 3`, UNDETERMINED, and I am not calling it green.** Pinned toolbox, from this
+worktree, `DEV_KUBECONFIG=/dev/null` and an `ENGINE` shim bind-mounting both the main
+checkout's `.git` (at its own host path) and the sibling spec repo read-only with
+`-e SPEC_REPO=/home-network-k3s`:
+
+    ENGINE=<two-mount shim> DEV_KUBECONFIG=/dev/null       ./infra/devcontainer/dev.sh run bash -c './ci/gate.sh'   # rc 3
+
+| stage | result |
+|---|---|
+| spec-immutability | **pass** — it genuinely RAN; the second mount is what makes it run from a worktree |
+| approval-policy | pass, but **N/A**: `event='none'`. It cannot see a PR locally, so this green says nothing. See below |
+| decisions-log | pass — the three required headings and the frozen-archive pin |
+| lint · l0 · render-golden · l1 | pass (L1: 3 offline checks, 0 failures, 0 skips, 0 unwired) |
+| gitea-settings | **SKIPPED** — `SETTINGS_API_TOKEN` unset; it exists only in CI |
+| conformance (L2/L3) | SKIPPED — `CLUSTER_AVAILABLE!=true`; the decision notes no cluster-needing requirement was touched |
+
+`gitea-settings` is the *only* stage that did not run, and it cannot be made to run from a
+workstation, so rc 3 is the ceiling for any local run — not a defect in this branch. The
+first gate attempt returned rc 3 for a different and real reason (`HEAD is not ahead of
+origin/main`: I had not committed yet, so the touched-requirement set was empty by default
+rather than by verification); it was re-run after committing, and the table above is the
+post-commit run. §3 now records both expected skips, because it previously named only
+`spec-immutability`.
+
+## What I did NOT verify
+
+- **GATE: UNVERIFIED at the time of writing.** The pinned-toolbox result for this branch and
+  its exit code are reported in the PR, not predicted here. **A local rc 3 is not green** and
+  will not be described as one.
+- **CI gate: RED, measured — `MERGE GATE: BLOCKED`, one failing stage.** Run 245 on PR #56,
+  head `b988da8b`, 1m47s. The only failure is `approval-policy`: *"a sensitive change lacks a
+  non-author approval"*, `sensitive paths touched: CLAUDE.md`, author `gitea-admin`. Every other
+  stage passed — `decisions-log`, `lint`, `l0`, `render-golden`, `l1`, and `gitea-settings`
+  (which can only run in CI, and reported `required_approvals = 0`,
+  `dismiss_stale_approvals = true`). `spec-immutability` SKIPPED in CI (no sibling spec repo in
+  the CI workspace — the inverse of the local run, where the two-mount shim made it pass) and
+  `conformance` SKIPPED. **Note `gate / conformance (pull_request)` reports status `success`
+  with description "Has been skipped"** — CLAUDE.md §2b's trap, live on this very PR. Nothing
+  in this branch is broken; the red is the structural human gate, below. *Measured at
+  `b988da8b`; this entry was then amended to record it, so the head SHA in the PR is newer than
+  the run quoted here and CI re-ran on the amended commit.*
+- **This PR is a sensitive-path PR and is CI-RED on `approval-policy` until a human acts.**
+  `CLAUDE.md` is in `infra/gitea/approval-policy.json`'s `sensitive_paths` ("the delivery
+  contract agents follow"), so the stage requires an approving review from someone who is not
+  the author, or an `/approve-override <reason>` posted by an administrator **as a PR review
+  of type "Comment"**, not in the plain comment box. `ci/approval-policy.sh` run locally
+  reports N/A (it cannot see a PR), so the local gate cannot catch this and a green local run
+  says nothing about it. **I have not posted an override and must not** — CLAUDE.md §1 forbids
+  an agent clearing this on its own PR even though `gitea-admin` holds `owner` and could.
+- **Nothing here is enforced.** §0 is prose. There is no gate stage that detects work done in
+  the shared checkout, no check that a worktree is outside the repo root, and no check that a
+  branch was cut from `origin/main`. Every other rule in CLAUDE.md that agents kept breaking
+  (`DECISIONS-LOG.md` appends, the three handoff headings) ended up as a gate stage, and that
+  is the honest follow-up here. I did not write one: the ask was documentation, and an
+  enforcement stage lands in `ci/**`, which is itself a sensitive path and deserves its own PR.
+- **I did not clean up the 31 stale merged worktrees or the 35 nested under
+  `.claude/worktrees/`.** They are other sessions' workspaces; removing them is an operator
+  action, and §0 explicitly tells agents not to remove worktrees they did not create.
+- **I did not touch the untracked `infra/agent/` and `platform/pm-agent/` trees** sitting in the
+  shared checkout. They are another run's in-flight work. Whose, and whether they are wanted,
+  is unknown to me.
+- **`docs/plans/ssd-etcd-execution-runbook.md:18` still points at a `.claude/worktrees/` path**
+  inside the repo. Left as-is deliberately: that runbook is marked COMPLETED/historical and
+  describes the now-decommissioned dev cluster, so the path is a record of what was done, not
+  an instruction. It does mean a grep for in-repo worktree paths is not yet clean.
+- **No runtime, cluster or Flux behaviour was touched or checked.** This branch changes three
+  Markdown files; `kubectl` was not run.

decisions/2026-10-05-vpn-remote-access-wireguard.md

@@ -0,0 +1,225 @@
+---
+date: 2026-10-05
+branch: feat/vpn-remote-access-wireguard
+title: Remote-access VPN — WireGuard on udp/51820, hostNetwork because a pod identity would 403 every Gateway hostname
+---
+
+## What changed
+
+New platform component `platform/vpn-ingress/`: a **WireGuard** remote-access VPN so the operator's
+Android / Linux / Windows / macOS devices can dial in from anywhere on the internet and behave like
+machines on the LAN — full reach to `192.168.2.0/24` plus internet egress out the house WAN.
+
+This is the **opposite direction** to the existing `platform/vpn-egress` (pods *out* through PIA,
+ADR-0015). They share nothing but the word "VPN"; both READMEs now say so, and `README.md`'s layout
+block labels the two.
+
+**Transport: WireGuard, and the security argument is the handshake's failure mode, not "it is
+encrypted".** WireGuard's first handshake message carries a MAC keyed with the responder's own
+public key, so a sender that does not already know it gets **no reply at all** — no error, no reset,
+no banner. From the internet, udp/51820 is indistinguishable from a closed port: nothing to
+brute-force, no version string, no amplification. That is what makes an unfiltered WAN port
+defensible here, and it is why there is deliberately no `loadBalancerSourceRanges`-style allowlist
+(which would also break roaming clients). It also has first-party clients on all four named
+platforms, which OpenVPN (needs a CA + per-device certs + a CRL) and IKEv2 do not.
+
+**`hostNetwork: true`, and this is THE decision — forced by a measured property of this cluster.**
+A pod-networked WireGuard server must SNAT client traffic to its own pod IP (Cilium drops a packet
+whose source is not the endpoint's address), so every remote client would have arrived wearing *that
+pod's* security identity. `decisions/2026-10-04-plex-advertise-plexdirect.md` measured what that
+costs: a request to the shared Gateway VIP **from inside a pod returns `403 Access denied` from
+Envoy for all 16 Gateway hostnames**, because Cilium's Gateway preserves the original source
+identity and enforces the *destination's* ingress policy, and every app admits `reserved:ingress`
+plus named peers — never an arbitrary pod. So the obvious build would have produced a tunnel that
+came up healthy, showed connected peers, routed packets, and 403'd every cluster web UI — and
+`*.home.keithjackson.dev` would not even have resolved, because `apps/wave-0/pihole-dns.yaml`'s
+ingress policy deliberately omits the `cluster` entity. In the host netns there is no pod identity
+to carry: forwarded traffic is SNATed to the node address and arrives as `host`/`remote-node`,
+byte-for-byte what a LAN client looks like. Three further problems vanish with it: `ip_forward` is
+already 1 on these nodes (so no `--allowed-unsafe-sysctls` kubelet change — it is *not* a safe
+sysctl); no LoadBalancer VIP, so no L2-announcement lease lottery and no `externalTrafficPolicy`
+trade-off; and no double encapsulation, which is what makes `MTU = 1420` simply correct.
+
+`hostNetwork` is permitted by `restrict-host-namespaces`' own stated carve-out (it matches
+`app-namespace=true` only, and names Cilium/node-exporter as the precedent); `namespace.yaml` is
+deliberately unlabelled. **The cost is stated, not buried:** a hostNetwork pod has no Cilium
+endpoint, so **no NetworkPolicy constrains this workload**. `networkpolicy.yaml` says that at
+length rather than shipping an `allow world → 51820` rule that would read as the control and
+enforce nothing; the real boundary is WireGuard's peer authentication.
+
+**A DaemonSet, not a Deployment.** The WAN forward names one node address by hand, off-repo (same
+shape as the plex tcp/32400 forward). A floating single replica would silently invalidate it on
+every reschedule; an identical listener on all three nodes makes **failover a one-line router
+change** with no cluster work and no re-issued client profiles. A pinned LoadBalancer VIP was the
+considered alternative and was rejected: it reintroduces the L2 lease, SNAT and an extra node hop
+into the one path whose failure mode is "I am away from home and cannot get in".
+
+**Authorisation is split so that it stays reviewable.** Peer **public** keys live in
+`platform/vpn-ingress/peers.yaml` in **plaintext** — a public key grants nothing by itself, and this
+makes "who can get into my house" a PR diff with `git log` as its audit trail. The only real secret,
+the server's private key, is the `wg-server-key` Secret, **created out of band by the operator**: an
+agent must not mint a long-lived private key (CLAUDE.md §6), and a key that passed through a session
+transcript would have to be treated as compromised. The two halves are joined only at pod start, by
+an init container, into a `medium: Memory` emptyDir — so the assembled config holding the key never
+touches a node's disk and dies with the pod.
+
+**There are no peers yet, and that is the correct initial state**, for the same reason. The VPN ships
+INERT-BUT-HEALTHY: a zero-peer interface listens and refuses every handshake.
+
+Files:
+
+- `platform/vpn-ingress/` (new): `namespace.yaml`, `peers.yaml` (the plaintext peer register),
+  `daemonset.yaml` (hostNetwork listener + config assembly), `networkpolicy.yaml` (namespace
+  baseline, with the honest caveat), `kustomization.yaml`, `README.md` (the design record).
+- `clusters/base/vpn-ingress.yaml` (new): its own **non-gating post-platform** Flux Kustomization
+  (`dependsOn platform-config`, `wait:false`). Non-gating is load-bearing rather than conventional
+  here: the DaemonSet *cannot* start until the operator creates the server key, so in the gating
+  `platform` tier an unfinished manual step would have stalled every apps wave on merge.
+- `clusters/base/kustomization.yaml`: the new tier added.
+- `clusters/base/cluster-vars.yaml`: new `WG_CLIENT_CIDR` (`10.90.0.0/24`), declared next to
+  `LAN_CIDR` because it is the one range that must be collision-checked against every other; the
+  comment enumerates the five it avoids. **No prod override, deliberately** — unlike every VIP, this
+  range is private to the tunnel, so the same value is correct in both environments and a prod patch
+  would imply otherwise. Substitution inventory updated.
+- `infra/ansible/roles/node_baseline/defaults/main.yml`: `wireguard` added to
+  `node_baseline_kernel_modules`. The pod has `NET_ADMIN` but deliberately **not** `SYS_MODULE`, so
+  it cannot autoload the module — it CrashLoops with a clear error rather than quietly degrading to
+  userspace wireguard-go (which would need `/dev/net/tun`, a device a hostPath mount cannot actually
+  grant, as the `/dev/dri` attempt proved).
+- `infra/vpn-ingress/new-peer.sh` (new): enrols a device. Generates the keypair on the operator's
+  machine, writes a 0600 profile **outside** the checkout (it refuses to write into the repo),
+  prints a QR code for phones, and prints only the public `[Peer]` stanza. It also refuses a
+  duplicate address, because two devices on one address does not error anywhere — the server routes
+  to whichever handshook last, so both appear to work intermittently.
+- `runbooks/vpn-remote-access.md` (new) + its `kustomization.yaml` generator entry + `README.md`
+  index line: the three manual steps, the four off-LAN verification checks, revocation, and why no
+  connection alert exists.
+- `README.md`: `vpn-ingress` added to the layout, with the egress/ingress distinction spelled out.
+
+**THREE MANUAL STEPS REMAIN AND THE VPN DOES NOT WORK UNTIL ALL THREE ARE DONE** (all off-repo by
+necessity; `runbooks/vpn-remote-access.md`): run `node_baseline` to load the kernel module, create
+the `wg-server-key` Secret, and forward WAN udp/51820 to one node address on the SOHO router.
+
+**SENSITIVE PATHS — this PR touches `clusters/**` (three files), so `ci/approval-policy.sh` will
+BLOCK it.** It needs the operator's `/approve-override <reason>` posted as a PR **review** of type
+"Comment". I have deliberately not posted it: CLAUDE.md §1 forbids an agent clearing this on its own
+PR, and the agent account holds `owner`, so the prohibition is a rule, not a limit.
+
+## What I verified
+
+Live prod, read-only, 2026-10-05, plus the offline gate.
+
+- **Toolbox gate** (`./infra/devcontainer/dev.sh run bash -c './ci/gate.sh'`): **rc 3**, with
+  `spec-immutability`, `decisions-log`, `lint`, `l0`, `render-golden`, `l1` and `approval-policy` all
+  **pass**. The rc 3 is two environmental skips — `gitea-settings` (no local `SETTINGS_API_TOKEN`)
+  and `conformance` L2/L3 (`CLUSTER_AVAILABLE` unset). **Not green. Reported as rc 3, not as pass.**
+  Run from an isolated git worktree with both CLAUDE.md §3 workarounds applied
+  (`DEV_KUBECONFIG=/dev/null` plus an `ENGINE` shim bind-mounting the main checkout's `.git` and
+  the sibling spec repo) — which is why `spec-immutability` is **green here and skipped in CI**,
+  where the runner has no spec checkout. `approval-policy` passing locally is an offline N/A, not a
+  verdict; the real verdict is the CI run below.
+- **The CI gate ran on PR #55 (run 244, head `1a67fc1b`) and `approval-policy` is the ONLY failing
+  stage** — read from the job log, not from the red tick. Verbatim: "This PR changes the pipeline or
+  the security posture it rests on, and has NO approving review from anyone other than its author
+  ('gitea-admin')", naming exactly the three files I predicted:
+  `clusters/base/cluster-vars.yaml`, `clusters/base/kustomization.yaml`,
+  `clusters/base/vpn-ingress.yaml`. Every other stage that ran reported green —
+  `gitea-settings`, `decisions-log`, `lint`, `l0`, `render-golden`, `l1`. So the branch is blocked
+  on the operator's `/approve-override <reason>` (posted as a PR **review** of type "Comment") and
+  on nothing else. **I have not posted it** — CLAUDE.md §1.
+- **Branch protection is live, measured by CI's own `gitea-settings` stage** (it has the token this
+  workstation lacks): `required_approvals = 0`, `enable_status_check = true`,
+  `status_check_contexts = ["gate / gate (pull_request)"]`, `block_admin_merge_override = true`,
+  `enable_push = false`, `dismiss_stale_approvals = true`, and **1 runner online**. That is the §2b
+  re-measurement of CLAUDE.md §2's table for this branch, not a restatement of it.
+- **`flux-postbuild-substitution` (L0) actually exercised the new wiring, and caught a real defect
+  in it.** On the first run it FAILED, naming `platform/vpn-ingress/daemonset.yaml:118` and
+  attributing it to "Flux Kustomization 'vpn-ingress' (clusters/base/vpn-ingress.yaml, path
+  ./platform/vpn-ingress)". Two things are proven by that message: the new tier's
+  `postBuild.substituteFrom` declaration is correctly detected (so `${WG_CLIENT_CIDR}` will be
+  substituted, not shipped literally), and the check reads comments as well as values — the hazard
+  was a comment that spelled out the forbidden braced form literally while claiming not to use it.
+  Fixed; the check now passes 444/444 with 0 hazards.
+- **The `wireguard` kernel module is available on these nodes by construction**: all three run
+  Debian 13 (trixie) on kernel `7.1.8+deb13-amd64` (measured), and WireGuard has been in-tree since
+  5.6, so it is present in the distro kernel and only needs loading.
+- **`net.ipv4.ip_forward = 1` is already written by `node_baseline`**
+  (`roles/node_baseline/tasks/main.yml`, `/etc/sysctl.d/99-k3s-cilium.conf`), and **no kubelet
+  carries `--allowed-unsafe-sysctls`** (grepped across `roles/k3s_server`, `roles/node_baseline` and
+  `group_vars`: zero hits). That pair is what makes the host netns the only option that does not
+  require a node-restart change.
+- **Cilium's datapath, measured from `cilium-config` rather than from the values file**:
+  `enable-ipv4-masquerade=true`, `enable-bpf-masquerade=true`, `routing-mode=tunnel`,
+  `tunnel-protocol=vxlan`, `ipv4-native-routing-cidr` EMPTY, Cilium `v1.20.1`. The vxlan underlay is
+  where `MTU = 1420` comes from, and the empty native-routing CIDR is why pod→LAN is masqueraded
+  today.
+- **`WG_CLIENT_CIDR` collides with nothing.** Pod CIDR `10.0.0.0/16` (`CLUSTER_POD_CIDR`), service
+  CIDR `10.43.0.0/16` (measured: `kubernetes` Service clusterIP is `10.43.0.1`), the PIA tunnel's
+  `10.72.192.0/18` (`platform/vpn-egress/README.md`), and both LANs `192.168.1.0/24` /
+  `192.168.2.0/24`. `10.90.0.0/24` is outside all five.
+- **The egress-class label matters and is set to `internet`.** Read live:
+  `CiliumEgressGatewayPolicy vpn-egress-steering` selects `podSelector:
+  homelab.keithjackson.dev/egress-class: vpn` with **no namespace scope**, so `vpn` here would have
+  steered every remote client's internet traffic out PIA.
+- **All three nodes are untainted** (`spec.taints: None` on each), so the DaemonSet covers the
+  cluster with no tolerations.
+- **`new-peer.sh` was run end to end** against a throwaway server key in the scratchpad (deleted
+  immediately after; it never existed in the repo). It rendered a correct profile — `Address
+  10.90.0.7/32`, `DNS 192.168.2.23`, `Endpoint wan.home.keithjackson.dev:51820`, `MTU 1420`,
+  `PersistentKeepalive 25`, `AllowedIPs 0.0.0.0/0` — at mode 0600, printed the matching public-key
+  stanza, and both argument-validation paths (missing name, out-of-range octet) refuse correctly.
+  The private key was redacted from every line I displayed.
+- **The endpoint name is resolver-independent, which is the specific trap this avoids.**
+  `wan.${BASE_DOMAIN}` is an unproxied public Cloudflare A record kept current by
+  `platform/externaldns/ddns.yaml` (checked every 5 min), so it resolves from a cellular connection
+  — unlike any name PiHole answers, which a remote client cannot resolve until it is already
+  connected. (This is the `plex.direct` lesson applied.)
+- **Velero does cover this namespace.** `platform/velero/helmrelease.yaml`'s `daily` schedule
+  excludes only `monitoring` and `unifi`, so `vpn-ingress` and the `wg-server-key` Secret are
+  captured off-cluster to R2. Read from the manifest, not from a backup listing.
+
+## What I did NOT verify
+
+- **THE ACTUAL FIX. Nothing in this branch has been proven to carry a single packet.** The
+  DaemonSet has never been reconciled, no `wg0` has ever existed, and no handshake has ever been
+  attempted. Three blockers are off-repo and manual (kernel module, server key, WAN forward), and
+  this branch removes none of them — it only makes them the *only* remaining work.
+- **Outside-in reachability, at all.** This repo has **no off-LAN vantage point**, which is exactly
+  the gap the plex remote-access work hit. Step 6 of the runbook (a phone on cellular) is the only
+  honest test and it has not been run.
+- **The in-pod `iptables` → host-netfilter interaction, which is my biggest single doubt.** Debian 13
+  uses nf_tables; the container writes MASQUERADE/FORWARD rules into the **host's** tables via the
+  image's own `iptables`. If that binary is the legacy backend while the host is nft, the rules can
+  apply to a table the kernel does not consult — and the symptom would be the nastiest available:
+  handshakes succeed, `wg show` looks perfect, and every forwarded connection hangs. **Check this
+  first if the tunnel comes up but nothing is reachable:** `iptables-save -t nat | grep MASQUERADE`
+  and `nft list table ip nat` on the node, from the host, not from the pod.
+- **Whether `allowPrivilegeEscalation: false` is compatible with the image's s6 init.** It is the
+  correct posture and I set it, but this repo has already been bitten by `no-new-privileges`
+  misbehaving (`platform/externaldns/ddns.yaml`'s README note). If the pod fails before
+  `wg-quick` runs, that flag is the first thing to try flipping.
+- **Whether `NET_ADMIN` alone is sufficient.** Reasoned from what `wg-quick` does (create the link,
+  set a sysctl, write two netfilter rules), not measured. If `iptables` complains, `NET_RAW` is the
+  likely addition — deliberately not granted pre-emptively.
+- **The image's custom-config path.** `lscr.io/linuxserver/wireguard:1.0.20260223-r0-ls124` (tag
+  confirmed to exist and to be the current one, published 2026-10-01) is expected to bring up
+  whatever is in `/config/wg_confs/` when `PEERS` is unset. That is its documented behaviour; it has
+  not been run here, and the init container's assembly of that file has never executed.
+- **Whether the probe is right.** `wg show wg0` is asserted to exit non-zero when the interface is
+  absent. Not executed.
+- **Cilium's reaction to a new `wg0` in the host netns.** `platform/cilium/values.yaml` does not pin
+  `devices`, so Cilium auto-detects; whether it attaches to `wg0` — and whether that matters — is
+  unknown. `wg` interfaces are already filtered out by `node_health_collect.py`, so something in
+  the estate anticipates them, but that is not evidence about Cilium.
+- **Zero peers means the end-to-end authorisation path is untested**, including revocation. The
+  first enrolment is also the first test of `peers.yaml`'s format being what `wg-quick` accepts.
+- **No peer-level observability exists.** An exporter publishing
+  `wireguard_latest_handshake_seconds` is the top follow-up; until then "who is connected" is an
+  on-demand `wg show` and nothing alerts on an unexpected session. Pod-down is covered only by
+  kube-prometheus-stack's generic `KubePodNotReady` / `KubeDeploymentReplicasMismatch`, which I did
+  not confirm fire for a DaemonSet in this namespace.
+- **The security consequence I am most keen for a human to review rather than take from me:** an
+  enrolled device reaches the three k3s nodes themselves — apiserver 6443, kubelet 10250, SSH 22 —
+  because "reach the entire local network" includes them. That is stated in the README and the
+  runbook with the narrowing recipe, but it is a posture decision, not a verified fact, and it is
+  the right thing to argue about on this PR.

decisions/README.md

@@ -26,7 +26,8 @@ The fix is the obvious one for concurrent appenders: **stop sharing a file**. Ea
 handoff is its own file. Two agents writing handoffs touch disjoint paths, so there is
 nothing for git to merge and nothing to conflict. This scales to any number of parallel
 branches with zero coordination — which is the point, since the agents are deliberately
-isolated from each other in separate worktrees and cannot coordinate.
+isolated from each other in separate worktrees (required by `CLAUDE.md` §0) and cannot
+coordinate.
 
 There is deliberately **no index file** and no counter. An index would be a shared
 mutable file — exactly the thing that just failed — and a sequence number would have