feat(keycloak): declare passkey (WebAuthn passwordless) login for the homelab realm
Adds the realm's WebAuthn Passwordless policy and restructures the browser-mfa
flow so a passkey is an ALTERNATIVE beside the password form. Additive and
optional by design: this IdP gates every SSO app plus kubectl, so a mandatory
passkey flow that misfires is a total lock-out. Enrolment is not forced.
Policy: RP ID is ${BASE_DOMAIN} (not the keycloak host) because a passkey's RP ID
is fixed at enrolment and must not be bound to a name that can move; resident key
required (a non-discoverable credential is a second factor, not a passkey); user
verification required (without it, possession alone is a complete login).
Flow: auth-username-password-form is split into auth-username-form +
auth-password-form, because the server must know who is logging in before it can
decide whether a passkey exists. Conditional OTP for platform-admins is relocated
intact onto the password branch only — a UV-required passkey is already two
phishing-resistant factors.
No requiredActions block is declared, deliberately: Keycloak 26.0.6 treats
requiredActions as REPLACE not merge, so declaring one would delete the default
set including CONFIGURE_TOTP and lock every platform-admin out of the OTP step
this flow still enforces. webauthn-register-passwordless is already registered
enabled-but-not-default by Keycloak's own defaults.
UNAPPLIED: the realm import is a one-shot resting at Done=True/Started=False, so
this reaches the live realm never. See the handoff entry and the README section.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <[email protected]>
This commit is contained in:
jakman85andClaude Opus 5 committed
1 parent
1a0b20857a
commit
16894b7b73
3 files changed
+664
-8
No files matched your search
@@ -0,0 +1,311 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
date: 2026-10-17
|
||||
branch: feat/keycloak-passkeys
|
||||
title: Passkeys declared for the homelab realm — and the realm import will not apply them
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## What changed
|
||||
|
||||
`platform/keycloak/keycloak-realm-import.yaml` now declares passkey (WebAuthn Passwordless)
|
||||
login for the `homelab` realm, in two parts:
|
||||
|
||||
1. **The WebAuthn Passwordless policy.** Ten `webAuthnPolicyPasswordless*` fields on the realm:
|
||||
RP ID `${BASE_DOMAIN}`, RP entity name `Homelab SSO`, signature algorithms `[ES256, RS256]`,
|
||||
`requireResidentKey: "Yes"`, `userVerificationRequirement: required`,
|
||||
`authenticatorAttachment: "not specified"`, `attestationConveyancePreference: none`,
|
||||
`acceptableAaguids: []`, `createTimeout: 300`, `avoidSameAuthenticatorRegister: true`.
|
||||
Deliberately the **passwordless** family only; the two-factor `webAuthnPolicy*` family is left
|
||||
at Keycloak's defaults because nothing in this realm uses `webauthn-authenticator`.
|
||||
|
||||
2. **The browser flow.** `browser-mfa` keeps its alias and stays bound as `browserFlow`; its
|
||||
interior is restructured so a passkey is an **ALTERNATIVE** beside the password form:
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
browser-mfa (top level, unchanged)
|
||||
browser-mfa-forms ALTERNATIVE
|
||||
auth-username-form REQUIRED <- was auth-username-password-form
|
||||
browser-mfa-passkey-or-password REQUIRED <- NEW sub-flow
|
||||
webauthn-authenticator-passwordless ALTERNATIVE <- NEW: the passkey
|
||||
browser-mfa-password-and-otp ALTERNATIVE <- NEW sub-flow
|
||||
auth-password-form REQUIRED <- was half of the combined form
|
||||
browser-mfa-conditional-otp CONDITIONAL (unchanged, relocated intact)
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
The design decisions, with their reasoning, are written into the manifest comments in this repo's
|
||||
usual density. The ones that matter:
|
||||
|
||||
* **Additive, not replacing. Enrolment optional, not forced.** This IdP gates Grafana, Gitea,
|
||||
Nextcloud, Headlamp, Semaphore, PiHole, Crafty, the \*arr stack *and* `kubectl` via the
|
||||
`kubernetes` OIDC client. A mandatory passkey flow that misfires is a total lock-out from the
|
||||
platform and the cluster API at once, leaving only the Keycloak bootstrap admin and the
|
||||
break-glass cert kubeconfig. The gain from forcing it (one human stops typing a password) does
|
||||
not price that risk.
|
||||
* **No `requiredActions` block was added, on purpose.** Declaring one would have been the obvious
|
||||
way to add `webauthn-register-passwordless`, and it would have been actively dangerous — see
|
||||
"What I verified".
|
||||
* **RP ID is `${BASE_DOMAIN}`, not `keycloak.${BASE_DOMAIN}`.** A passkey's RP ID is fixed at
|
||||
enrolment and can never be re-keyed, so it must not be bound to a name that can move. This realm
|
||||
already declares an `auth.${BASE_DOMAIN}` redirect URI, and this repo already owns a reconciler
|
||||
built because a hostname move silently failed to reach the realm. Residual risk, unavoidable:
|
||||
changing `BASE_DOMAIN` itself invalidates every enrolled passkey.
|
||||
* **A passkey login is not also asked for TOTP.** `browser-mfa-conditional-otp` hangs off the
|
||||
password branch only. The justification is `userVerificationRequirement: required` — the
|
||||
ceremony already proves possession plus a verified human, phishing-resistantly and origin-bound.
|
||||
Stacking a replayable shared secret on top of that buys friction. The manifest names the exact
|
||||
one-line edit to reverse this decision.
|
||||
* **Login becomes two screens** (username, then password) for every user, passkey or not, because
|
||||
the server must know who is logging in before it can decide whether a passkey exists. Accepted
|
||||
cost; it is the enabling change.
|
||||
* **Usernameless login deliberately not used**, although Keycloak 26.0.6 supports it — see "What I
|
||||
verified" for the measured reason it would have made every login open on a passkey prompt.
|
||||
|
||||
`platform/keycloak/README.md` gains a `## Passkeys` section: the decision table, the fact that
|
||||
this does not reach the live realm, the two operator paths that would apply it, and the four-step
|
||||
browser verification nobody has run.
|
||||
|
||||
No secret, key, credential or AAGUID was minted or committed. No file under `clusters/**`,
|
||||
`conformance/**`, `ci/**`, `platform/kyverno/**`, `**/rbac.yaml` or `**/*.sops.yaml` was touched,
|
||||
so this should not trip `ci/approval-policy.sh`'s sensitive-path review requirement.
|
||||
|
||||
## What I verified
|
||||
|
||||
**The live realm import has already completed and will never re-run.** Measured on prod,
|
||||
2026-10-17:
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
$ kubectl --context k3s-prod -n keycloak get keycloakrealmimport homelab -o jsonpath='{.status}'
|
||||
{"conditions":[{"message":"","status":"True","type":"Done"},
|
||||
{"message":"","status":"False","type":"Started"},
|
||||
{"message":"","status":"False","type":"HasErrors"}]}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
`Done=True` / `Started=False`, exactly the one-shot state `platform/keycloak/README.md` already
|
||||
documents for client secrets and client URLs. **So the change in this PR has zero effect on how
|
||||
anyone logs in today**, and the client-secret/client-URL reconciler does not and cannot close the
|
||||
gap: its hard endpoint allow-list makes `/authentication` unreachable by design, and realm-level
|
||||
policy fields are not client fields.
|
||||
|
||||
**The CRD accepts every field I used.** Measured against the live CRD (not the upstream docs):
|
||||
`kubectl --context k3s-prod get crd keycloakrealmimports.k8s.keycloak.org` lists all twelve
|
||||
`webAuthnPolicyPasswordless*` properties with the types I wrote (`RequireResidentKey`,
|
||||
`RpEntityName`, `RpId`, `UserVerificationRequirement`, `AttestationConveyancePreference`,
|
||||
`AuthenticatorAttachment` as `string`; `SignatureAlgorithms`, `AcceptableAaguids`, `ExtraOrigins`
|
||||
as `array/string`; `CreateTimeout` as `integer`; `AvoidSameAuthenticatorRegister` as `boolean`),
|
||||
plus `authenticationFlows`, `authenticatorConfig` and `requiredActions`. The `spec.realm` schema
|
||||
has **no** `x-kubernetes-preserve-unknown-fields`, so a misspelled field would have been pruned
|
||||
silently rather than rejected — which is why this was checked rather than assumed.
|
||||
|
||||
**Running Keycloak is 26.0.6.** `quay.io/keycloak/keycloak:26.0.6` on `keycloak-0`/`keycloak-1`,
|
||||
operator `quay.io/keycloak/keycloak-operator:26.0.6`. Every source claim below is read from the
|
||||
`26.0.6` tag, not from memory or from docs.
|
||||
|
||||
**Every provider ID is quoted from upstream source, not guessed.**
|
||||
|
||||
| String I used | Where it is defined at tag 26.0.6 |
|
||||
|---|---|
|
||||
| `webauthn-authenticator-passwordless` | `WebAuthnPasswordlessAuthenticatorFactory.PROVIDER_ID`, display "WebAuthn Passwordless Authenticator" |
|
||||
| `auth-username-form` | `UsernameFormFactory.PROVIDER_ID`, display "Username Form" |
|
||||
| `auth-password-form` | `PasswordFormFactory.PROVIDER_ID`, display "Password Form" |
|
||||
| `webauthn-register-passwordless` | `WebAuthnPasswordlessRegisterFactory.PROVIDER_ID` (referenced in comments only) |
|
||||
|
||||
**`requiredActions` is REPLACE, not merge — measured, and it is why I did not declare one.**
|
||||
`model/storage-private/.../DefaultExportImportManager.java` lines 327-338:
|
||||
|
||||
```java
|
||||
if (rep.getRequiredActions() != null) {
|
||||
for (RequiredActionProviderRepresentation action : rep.getRequiredActions()) { ... }
|
||||
DefaultRequiredActions.addDeleteAccountAction(newRealm);
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
DefaultRequiredActions.addActions(newRealm);
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Declaring one required action therefore skips the entire default set. `RealmManager` is no
|
||||
backstop: `setupRequiredActions` is `if (realm.getRequiredActionProvidersStream().count() == 0)`,
|
||||
and the count is already non-zero by then (`RepresentationToModel.importRealm` runs at
|
||||
`RealmManager.java:585`, the backstop at `:612`). A realm built that way would have had the passkey
|
||||
action plus `delete_account` and nothing else — **no `CONFIGURE_TOTP`**, which would leave
|
||||
`auth-otp-form` demanding a TOTP that no platform-admin could ever enrol: a hard lock-out
|
||||
delivered by a change whose purpose was to *add* a login method.
|
||||
|
||||
**And declaring it would have bought nothing.** `DefaultRequiredActions.addWebAuthnPasswordlessRegisterAction`
|
||||
registers `webauthn-register-passwordless` with `setEnabled(true)`, `setDefaultAction(false)`,
|
||||
priority 80, gated on `Profile.Feature.WEB_AUTHN` — which is `Type.DEFAULT` in
|
||||
`common/.../Profile.java:74`, i.e. on unless explicitly disabled. `enabled=true` /
|
||||
`defaultAction=false` *is* the additive-and-optional posture this change wants.
|
||||
|
||||
**`authenticationFlows` has the opposite semantics, which is why declaring flows is safe.**
|
||||
`importAuthenticationFlows` adds the declared flows, then backfills each unbound binding
|
||||
(browser, registration, direct grant, reset credentials, client auth, first broker login, docker
|
||||
auth) from the built-in defaults individually (`DefaultExportImportManager.java` ~1320-1410).
|
||||
|
||||
**The graceful degradation to password is measured from the flow engine, not assumed.** For a user
|
||||
with no passkey: `WebAuthnPasswordlessAuthenticator.requiresUser()` returns `false`, so
|
||||
`DefaultAuthenticationFlow.processSingleFlowExecutionModel` takes the `else` branch (`daf:456-462`),
|
||||
whose four conditions all hold — a user is set (from `auth-username-form`), `configuredFor` is
|
||||
false, `WebAuthnPasswordlessAuthenticatorFactory.isUserSetupAllowed()` is `false`, and
|
||||
`WebAuthnAuthenticator implements Authenticator, CredentialValidator<...>` — so it raises
|
||||
`CREDENTIAL_SETUP_REQUIRED`. The ALTERNATIVE loop (`daf:289-302`) catches exactly that, marks the
|
||||
execution `ATTEMPTED` and proceeds to the next alternative, with the upstream comment *"the user,
|
||||
since he has alternatives, should be able to go to another alternative and continue"*. Hence: no
|
||||
passkey, no passkey screen, straight to the password form.
|
||||
|
||||
**Why usernameless was rejected, measured.** The `configuredFor` guard sits inside the
|
||||
`requiresUser()` branch. With `requiresUser()` false and no user yet in context, that guard is
|
||||
skipped and the engine just calls `authenticate(context)` — so a passkey execution placed before
|
||||
the username form is offered to *everyone*, including users who will never own one.
|
||||
|
||||
**The policy sentinels are read from the shipped code, and one of my initial assumptions was
|
||||
wrong.** `Constants.DEFAULT_WEBAUTHN_POLICY_NOT_SPECIFIED = "not specified"` is the
|
||||
realm-representation sentinel — but `WebAuthnConstants.OPTION_NOT_SPECIFIED = ""` (empty string) is
|
||||
the WebAuthn-API-level one. I checked both because they disagree. The login theme's
|
||||
`webauthnRegister.js` at 26.0.6 settles the behaviour:
|
||||
|
||||
```js
|
||||
if (input.requireResidentKey !== 'not specified') {
|
||||
if (input.requireResidentKey === 'Yes') { authenticatorSelection.requireResidentKey = true; }
|
||||
else { authenticatorSelection.requireResidentKey = false; }
|
||||
}
|
||||
...
|
||||
if (input.createTimeout !== 0) { publicKey.timeout = input.createTimeout * 1000; }
|
||||
rp: {id: input.rpId, name: input.rpEntityName}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
So `"Yes"` is a literal string compare (any other non-sentinel value means *false*), `"not
|
||||
specified"` is compared literally for four fields, and `createTimeout` is **seconds** with `0`
|
||||
meaning "send no timeout". It also shows 26.0.6 emits only the legacy `requireResidentKey` member,
|
||||
never `residentKey: "required"` — the client maps that per WebAuthn L2, but the policy cannot
|
||||
express `residentKey: "preferred"` at all.
|
||||
|
||||
`[ES256, RS256]` is exactly `WebAuthnPolicy.DEFAULT_POLICY` /
|
||||
`Constants.DEFAULT_WEBAUTHN_POLICY_SIGNATURE_ALGORITHMS` — declared explicitly, not changed.
|
||||
`getWebAuthnPolicyPasswordless` was read field by field to confirm `[]` for `acceptableAaguids`
|
||||
means "no restriction" and that `RpEntityName` must be non-empty or the **update** path
|
||||
(`DefaultExportImportManager.java:842`) drops the whole policy silently.
|
||||
|
||||
**The manifest parses and renders.** `yaml.safe_load` round-trips the file and the flow graph reads
|
||||
back exactly as designed (five flows, the executions and priorities above, `browserFlow:
|
||||
browser-mfa`, `requiredActions` absent). `python3 ci/render-keycloak-client-urls.py --check` →
|
||||
`client-urls.yaml is in sync`, rc 0 (no client URL changed, so no regeneration was needed).
|
||||
`yamllint -c ci/yamllint.yaml platform/keycloak/keycloak-realm-import.yaml` → rc 0; no line exceeds
|
||||
the 160-column ceiling.
|
||||
|
||||
**`browser-mfa` keeps its alias deliberately.** `conformance/tests/l2-behavioral/keycloak-config-as-code`
|
||||
asserts `kubectl get keycloakrealmimport homelab -o jsonpath={.spec.realm.browserFlow} | grep -q
|
||||
'browser-mfa'`. Renaming the top-level flow would have failed that test.
|
||||
|
||||
**Envsubst safety.** `platform-config`'s Flux Kustomization declares
|
||||
`postBuild.substituteFrom: cluster-vars` (`clusters/base/platform-config.yaml:26-29`), so this file
|
||||
is substituted. The only brace token I added is `${BASE_DOMAIN}`, which is declared at
|
||||
`clusters/base/cluster-vars.yaml:42` (`home.keithjackson.dev`). Every comment I wrote avoids braces
|
||||
entirely — the RP-ID discussion says `keycloak.<BASE_DOMAIN>` with angle brackets precisely so an
|
||||
unparseable token cannot fail the whole Kustomization.
|
||||
|
||||
**Gate result: rc 3, zero failures, `gitea-settings` the only stage the gate counts as not-run** —
|
||||
the documented honest best local outcome. Run in the pinned toolbox from this worktree with all
|
||||
three §3 workarounds (`DEV_KUBECONFIG=/dev/null`, plus an `ENGINE` shim bind-mounting the main
|
||||
checkout's `.git` and the sibling spec repo with `SPEC_REPO=/home-network-k3s`):
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
[ ok ] stage spec-immutability: pass <- NOT skipped; both shim mounts worked, R-TEST-06 covered
|
||||
[ ok ] stage decisions-log: pass <- archive frozen, 48 entries well-formed
|
||||
[ ok ] stage lint: pass
|
||||
[ ok ] stage l0: pass <- incl. flux-postbuild-substitution + keycloak-client-secret-reconciler
|
||||
[ ok ] stage render-golden: pass
|
||||
[ ok ] stage l1: pass
|
||||
[ ok ] stage approval-policy: pass <- no sensitive path touched, so no non-author review needed
|
||||
[skip] stage gitea-settings: SKIPPED <- needs SETTINGS_API_TOKEN, CI-only; expected
|
||||
[skip] stage conformance: SKIPPED <- cluster-gated L2/L3; expected
|
||||
MERGE GATE: UNDETERMINED — Stages that did not run: gitea-settings
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
No lint finding and no check failure names either file I changed. Touched requirements resolved to
|
||||
`R-IDP-01 R-IDP-02 R-IDP-03 R-IDP-04 R-IDP-05 R-IDP-06`; coverage 51/51, 0 gaps.
|
||||
|
||||
**A note on how that number was obtained, because the first attempt was worthless.** My first gate
|
||||
run returned the same rc 3 and the same seven passes — against a tree that did not contain this
|
||||
change at all. The gate's `tracked_files()` reads **git**, and my edits were still uncommitted, so
|
||||
every stage gated `origin/main`. The tell was in the log and I nearly missed it: the
|
||||
touched-requirement subset reported UNDETERMINED with *"check out the feature branch you mean to
|
||||
gate (not the base branch)"*, and `decisions-log` counted **47** entries rather than 48. **A green
|
||||
gate run on an uncommitted worktree is a gate run on the base branch.** The numbers above are from
|
||||
the second run, after committing and rebasing.
|
||||
|
||||
**The base moved under me mid-run.** `origin/main` advanced from `9a41a8e` to `1a0b208` (PR #70,
|
||||
oauth2-proxy OIDC startup race) while I was working. This branch is rebased onto `1a0b208`, so the
|
||||
gate above ran on the base CI will actually merge into. The rebase was clean — PR #70 touched
|
||||
`platform/oauth2-proxy/helmrelease.yaml` and its own decisions entry, disjoint from these files.
|
||||
|
||||
## What I did NOT verify
|
||||
|
||||
**This change is unapplied. It changes nothing about the live realm, and I did not attempt to make
|
||||
it.** `Done=True` / `Started=False` was measured, not inferred, and I ran no mutating `kubectl`,
|
||||
no `flux reconcile`, no admin-API call and no `kcadm`. Whether the operator's eventual
|
||||
admin-console reconstruction of this flow matches what is declared here is, by construction,
|
||||
unverifiable from git.
|
||||
|
||||
**I never enrolled a passkey and never pointed a browser at any of this.** Nothing here has been
|
||||
exercised by a real WebAuthn ceremony on any device. Specifically unverified:
|
||||
|
||||
* **That the RP ID works.** `home.keithjackson.dev` is a registrable-domain suffix of
|
||||
`keycloak.home.keithjackson.dev`, so it *should* satisfy the browser's check — but I verified
|
||||
that by reading the WebAuthn rule, not by watching a browser accept it. A wrong RP ID fails
|
||||
**silently, in the browser, before Keycloak is involved**, with no server-side log line. If
|
||||
enrolment produces no OS prompt and no error, this is the first suspect.
|
||||
* **That `"not specified"` is the right literal for `authenticatorAttachment` in a realm import.**
|
||||
I traced it to `Constants.DEFAULT_WEBAUTHN_POLICY_NOT_SPECIFIED` and to the theme's string
|
||||
compare, but I have not seen a realm import accept it. Omitting the field would default to the
|
||||
same value; if an import ever rejects the literal, drop the line.
|
||||
* **That `createTimeout: 300` behaves.** Seconds-vs-milliseconds is read from the theme JS. The
|
||||
claim that 300 is long enough for the cross-device QR/hybrid flow, and that Chrome clamps rather
|
||||
than rejects it, is reasoning about browser behaviour, not a measurement.
|
||||
* **Whether a passkey user can still reach the password form.** I argued it from
|
||||
`createAuthenticationSelectionList` producing a "Try another way" option, and I noted that for a
|
||||
user holding both credentials the *first* screen is chosen by the user's own credential ordering
|
||||
rather than by my priorities. Neither was observed.
|
||||
* **The two-screen login regression for ordinary users.** `auth-username-form` +
|
||||
`auth-password-form` replacing `auth-username-password-form` is a visible change for every user
|
||||
including non-passkey family accounts, and nobody has logged in through it.
|
||||
* **That conditional OTP for platform-admins still fires on the password branch.** The sub-flow and
|
||||
its `conditional-otp-platform-admin` config are byte-identical and merely relocated one level
|
||||
deeper, but "identical YAML" is not "still enforced at runtime". This is the highest-value
|
||||
regression check and it is untested. The previous breakage of this exact step
|
||||
(`condUserRole` vs a non-existent property key) 403'd every platform-admin login.
|
||||
* **That a platform-admin authenticating by passkey is not challenged for TOTP.** That is the
|
||||
intended behaviour of the shape I wrote; it is unobserved, and it is also a deliberate
|
||||
relaxation of R-IDP-04 as previously implemented, which the operator may want to reverse.
|
||||
|
||||
**Whether the realm import reconciles into an existing realm: measured as NO for the completed
|
||||
one-shot, but I did not test a re-import.** I did not delete and recreate the
|
||||
`KeycloakRealmImport`, so I cannot say what a re-run would do to the existing `homelab` realm —
|
||||
whether it would merge the new policy and flows, duplicate flow aliases, or fail. The 2026-09-06
|
||||
total SSO outage documented in `platform/keycloak/README.md` is the reason I did not experiment.
|
||||
**Treat the re-import path in the README as untested advice, not a runbook.**
|
||||
|
||||
**Nothing was proved about the live realm's current state.** I did not read the realm's existing
|
||||
required actions, its existing WebAuthn policies, or its live flow executions — doing so needs the
|
||||
admin credential and I did not decrypt or use it. So I cannot confirm that the live realm's
|
||||
required-action set actually contains `webauthn-register-passwordless` today; I can only show that
|
||||
Keycloak 26.0.6's defaults register it and that this repo's import never declared any required
|
||||
actions to suppress them. **That inference has not been checked against the realm.**
|
||||
|
||||
**L2/L3 conformance did not run** (no cluster from the gate container; `vars.CLUSTER_AVAILABLE` is
|
||||
unset in CI anyway), so the existing `keycloak-config-as-code` behavioural test did not re-execute
|
||||
against this change. I reasoned about its assertion by reading it.
|
||||
|
||||
**No new conformance test was added.** Nothing in `conformance/` asserts the passkey policy or the
|
||||
new flow shape, so a future edit can silently remove either and no gate stage will notice. That is
|
||||
a real gap this PR leaves open; closing it would touch `conformance/**`, which is a sensitive path
|
||||
needing non-author review.
|
||||
|
||||
**The quoted gate run predates this file's own gate-result paragraph.** It gated commit `207f5db`;
|
||||
the gate numbers and the rebase note above were then written into this entry, so the pushed tree
|
||||
differs from the gated one by this handoff's prose only — no manifest, no check, no generated file.
|
||||
`decisions-log` is the only stage that reads this file, and it validates structure (frontmatter,
|
||||
the three headings, non-stub bodies), which is unchanged. I did not re-run the full gate for a
|
||||
prose edit; CI will gate the pushed commit.
|
||||
|
||||
**`gitea-settings` did not run locally** — it needs `SETTINGS_API_TOKEN`, which exists only in CI.
|
||||
I did not re-measure branch protection, the runner, or `required_approvals` against the Gitea API
|
||||
this session; the claims in `CLAUDE.md` §2 are taken on trust here and are explicitly flagged there
|
||||
as needing re-measurement.
|
||||
Reference in new issue
Block a user