feat(pm-agent): an in-cluster AI Program Manager that turns Gitea issues into pull requests

A service that reads this repository's Gitea issues, decides what to do about each
thread as the Program Manager persona, and runs one worker agent per assignment that
authors a change, runs the merge gate and opens a pull request. It reacts to issue
creation and to comments; the assignment and all correspondence travel through the
issue thread and the PR. It authenticates with an Anthropic subscription token. It
never pushes to main and never merges.

Three choices carry the design, with alternatives recorded in docs/plans/:
 - it POLLS rather than receiving webhooks (Gitea's webhook SSRF guard, lost
   deliveries, and no inbound reach needed at all);
 - it keeps NO state: the trigger is "the newest thing in this thread was not
   written by me", so the issue thread is the state — no PVC, no backup obligation;
 - the model holds NO tools: its reply is one JSON object this code validates, so
   nothing in the path executes text.

The boundary is platform/kyverno/admission/pm-agent-job-shape.yaml (Enforce,
failurePolicy: Fail), not the RBAC: Kubernetes places no `use` check on
serviceAccountName, so "may create Jobs" is "may run arbitrary code as the
namespace's most privileged identity". Six rules admit only the committed shape, and
the worker identity is bound to nothing with no token mounted, so there is nothing to
escalate to. 28/28 offline Kyverno assertions.

Nothing has run: the image has never been built or pushed, and both the image digest
and the two credentials are deliberate placeholders. See the handoff entry's
"What I did NOT verify".

Refs CLAUDE.md §1/§3/§6, R-SEC-02, R-GITOPS-02.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <[email protected]>

decisions/2026-10-05-pm-agent-issue-to-pr.md

@@ -0,0 +1,163 @@
+---
+date: 2026-10-05
+branch: feat/pm-agent-issue-to-pr
+title: An in-cluster AI Program Manager that turns Gitea issues into pull requests — authored, nothing deployed
+---
+
+## What changed
+
+A new service, `pm-agent`, that runs in the cluster, reads the issues of this Gitea
+repository, decides what to do about each thread **as the Program Manager persona this
+repository already works under**, and runs one worker agent per assignment that authors a
+change, runs the merge gate and opens a pull request. It reacts to issue creation and to
+comments; the assignment and all correspondence travel through the issue thread and the PR.
+It authenticates with an Anthropic **subscription** token. It never pushes to `main` and
+never merges.
+
+Design, alternatives and threat model: `docs/plans/pm-agent-issue-to-pr.md`. Operating
+surface: `platform/pm-agent/README.md`. Operator procedures:
+`runbooks/pm-agent.md`.
+
+**New — the agent itself** (`infra/agent/`): one image (`agent-runner`) layered on the pinned
+dev toolbox plus node and the Claude Code CLI, with two fixed entrypoints and no argument
+surface. `pm-dispatch` is the PM; `pm-worker` is one assignment. `pm-persona.md` is the PM
+persona, assembled from `CLAUDE.md`, the frozen log's PM guardrails and the spec repo's
+`agents/roles.md`. `worker-job-template.yaml` is the only Job shape the dispatcher may
+create, baked into the image rather than mounted, because that template *is* the shape the
+admission policy protects. `versions.env` pins only what the toolbox lacks — deliberately not
+a second copy of the toolchain pins. `build-image.sh` builds, verifies in-image as uid 65532
+on a read-only rootfs, and **never pushes**.
+
+**New — the deployment** (`platform/pm-agent/`): namespace (no `app-namespace` label — this
+is CI plumbing like `gitea-actions`; PodSecurity `restricted` is enforced), `rbac.yaml` (the
+dispatcher may `create/get/list/watch jobs` in its own namespace and nothing else; the worker
+identity is bound to **nothing** and mounts no token), the dispatcher Deployment (1 replica,
+`Recreate` — two dispatchers would double-trigger every thread), `configmap.yaml` (every knob,
+with its reasoning), `networkpolicy.yaml` (default-deny; egress to gitea:3000,
+kube-apiserver for the dispatcher only, tcp/443; **no ingress at all**), and
+`pm-agent-credentials.sops.yaml` holding **placeholders**.
+
+**New — the boundary** (`platform/kyverno/admission/pm-agent-job-shape.yaml`, `Enforce` +
+`failurePolicy: Fail`): Kubernetes places no `use` check on `serviceAccountName`, so "may
+create Jobs" is "may run arbitrary code as the namespace's most privileged identity". Six
+rules admit only the committed shape. It is listed in `platform-config/kustomization.yaml`,
+which is the only list that actually applies ClusterPolicies — adding it to
+`platform/kyverno/admission/kustomization.yaml` alone is a silent no-op, which is exactly how
+the conformance boundary shipped green and never reached the cluster on 2026-09-29.
+
+**Wiring:** `clusters/base/pm-agent.yaml` (dependsOn `apps-wave-0` — what it needs is Gitea,
+not Keycloak or the Gateway; `wait: false`, because the pod is *expected* to be unhealthy
+while its credentials and image digest are placeholders), its line in
+`clusters/base/kustomization.yaml`, a SOPS decryption patch in **both** overlays, and an
+`inClusterClients` entry for the `pm-agent` namespace on `catalog/gitea.yaml` with
+`apps/wave-0/gitea.yaml` re-rendered by the canonical command.
+
+Three design choices worth naming, with the alternatives recorded in the plan: it **polls**
+rather than receiving webhooks (Gitea's webhook SSRF guard, lost deliveries, and no need for
+inbound reach); it keeps **no state** — the trigger is "the newest thing in this thread was
+not written by me", so the thread is the state and there is no PVC and no backup obligation;
+and the **model holds no tools** — its reply is one JSON object that this code validates, so
+nothing in the path executes text.
+
+## What I verified
+
+All offline, in the pinned toolbox (`./infra/devcontainer/dev.sh run`), never on the host.
+
+- **`kyverno test platform/kyverno/tests/pm-agent` → 28 passed, 0 failed** under the pinned
+  CLI (v1.19.0). The first run was **27 passed, 1 failed** and caught a real defect: the
+  volume rule asserted `length(emptyDir) != 0`, which denies the valid `emptyDir: {}`. Fixed
+  by asserting the volume's **key set** instead, which also denies every other source type
+  without enumerating them. The suite includes the two cases a careless policy admits — a
+  second container while `containers[0]` is compliant, and a volume *named* `workspace` whose
+  source is a `hostPath`.
+- **`./ci/gate.sh` → exit 3, MERGE GATE: UNDETERMINED. Not green, and not reported as
+  green.** Per-stage, quoted from the run: spec-immutability **pass** (the spec repo is a
+  sibling of this checkout and is clean at the pinned SHA), decisions-log **pass**, lint
+  **pass**, l0 **pass**, render-golden **pass** (10 services reproduce), l1 **pass**,
+  approval-policy **pass** (N/A off a pull-request event), conformance **declared-skip** (no
+  cluster — Phase 0), and `gitea-settings` **SKIPPED**: `SETTINGS_API_TOKEN` is not set on
+  this workstation, so branch protection and runner registration are UNVERIFIED by this run.
+  The gate names that single stage as the reason for rc 3 ("Stages that did not run:
+  gitea-settings"), so nothing in the change is unexamined — but rc 3 is not a pass and this
+  entry does not call it one.
+- **The gate caught two real defects in this change before I did**, which is worth recording
+  because both were in the parts I was most confident about:
+  1. `flux-postbuild-substitution` → 1 UNDEFINED + 1 FATAL-PARSE. My ConfigMap's *comment*
+     explaining the envsubst hazard contained two dollar-brace tokens, and envsubst runs over
+     comment lines too — so the paragraph warning about the trap was itself the trap. Rewritten
+     without braces.
+  2. `no-plaintext-secrets` → the unencrypted `.example` template was read as REFERENCED by a
+     kustomization, because the kustomization's comment named it by filename. Correctly
+     refused: the distance between a filename in a comment and a line under `resources:` is
+     one careless edit. The comment now points at it in prose.
+- **`check-jsonschema --schemafile schemas/servicedefinition.schema.json catalog/gitea.yaml`
+  → ok.**
+- **The golden reproduces:** `python3 catalog/render.py --all catalog -o apps --wave-layout
+  --no-image-automation` leaves `apps/wave-0/gitea.yaml` byte-identical to what is committed,
+  and the only diff versus `main` is the new `gitea-allow-pm-agent-ingress`
+  CiliumNetworkPolicy.
+- **Syntax:** `bash -n infra/agent/pm-worker` and `ast.parse` on `pm-dispatch.py` both clean.
+  `yaml.safe_load_all` parses every new manifest.
+- **The spec repo has no git remote** — `git remote -v` in `../home-network-k3s` prints
+  nothing. That is *why* a worker's gate can never run `spec-immutability` in-cluster, and it
+  is measured rather than assumed. The worker's acceptance rule names that stage and
+  `gitea-settings` explicitly and refuses any other skip.
+- **`PM_SELFTEST=1 python3 infra/agent/pm-dispatch.py` → exit 0, 26 assertions, all ok**
+  (run in the toolbox against the repository's own files, with `PM_WORKER_JOB_TEMPLATE` and
+  `PM_PERSONA_FILE` pointed at `infra/agent/`). It covers the branch vocabulary in both
+  directions (`feature/x`, `main`, `feat/AB`, `feat/x;rm -rf /` and `../../etc/passwd` all
+  refused), the five result-envelope shapes `extract_decision` has to survive plus three it
+  must reject, the committed Job template against its whole contract (pinned command, no
+  args, the powerless SA, no mounted token, the volume set, the security context, and every
+  env name inside the dispatcher's allowlist), and that the persona still says the four
+  things it must. `build-image.sh` runs the same selftest inside the image; that invocation
+  is the one that has not happened, because the image has not been built.
+- **Claude Code facts were read from the current documentation, not from memory:**
+  `claude setup-token` mints a one-year subscription OAuth token consumed via
+  `CLAUDE_CODE_OAUTH_TOKEN`; `ANTHROPIC_API_KEY`/`ANTHROPIC_AUTH_TOKEN` rank **above** it in
+  credential precedence (hence the unsets and the env-name allowlist); `--bare` does **not**
+  read it (hence neither entrypoint uses that flag); `--permission-prompts none` requires
+  >= 2.1.259, which is why the image asserts a version floor. The pin `2.1.285` is the npm
+  registry's `stable` dist-tag, measured on 2026-10-05.
+
+## What I did NOT verify
+
+**Nothing in this change has run.** That is the headline, and everything below is a
+consequence of it.
+
+- **The image has never been built.** The nodejs module-stream install, the `npm i -g
+  @anthropic-ai/claude-code@2.1.285` layer, the version-floor assertion, the `COPY`
+  ownership assertions and `build-image.sh`'s whole in-image verification (including
+  `PM_SELFTEST=1 pm-dispatch`) are **unexercised**. Expect the build to need iteration.
+- **It has never been pushed,** so the committed image digests are the deliberate all-zero
+  placeholder. Nothing has pulled this image.
+- **No pod has started.** The dispatcher has never authenticated to Gitea, never polled,
+  never triaged an issue, never created a Job. No worker has cloned, branched, run a session,
+  run the gate in-cluster, pushed a branch, opened a pull request or commented on an issue.
+  Every claim about runtime behaviour is a design claim.
+- **The admission policy has not met a live API server.** 28 offline assertions prove the
+  policy *refuses*; nothing proves the API server *enforces* it here. That is an L2 test and
+  it needs a cluster. Note also that `CLAUDE.md` §2b applies to me as much as to anyone: I
+  did not query whether Kyverno is healthy, whether `pm-agent-job-shape` reconciles, or
+  whether `platform-config` is Ready.
+- **The network policies have not been exercised.** Whether `toEntities: kube-apiserver`
+  actually permits `kubectl` from this namespace on k3s, and whether `world:443` reaches
+  `api.anthropic.com` through this cluster's egress, are both unmeasured.
+- **Neither credential exists.** The Gitea bot account has not been created, so its
+  permission has not been measured — and *that measurement is the control* that keeps the
+  agent from clearing its own sensitive-path review. Do it before the first real run.
+- **Gitea's webhook `ALLOWED_HOST_LIST` was not queried.** It is cited as a reason webhooks
+  were rejected; it is not a measured fact about this Gitea.
+- **The `write`-can-merge gap is real and unclosed.** No Gitea token scope separates "push a
+  branch and open a pull request" from "merge it". The service issues no merge call, which is
+  a property of the code, not of the credential.
+- **The worker's credentials are inside the model session's reach.** Same container, same
+  uid; no isolation exists and none is claimed. Bounded by token scope and egress only.
+- **This branch touches sensitive paths** — `clusters/**`, `platform/kyverno/**`,
+  `platform-config/kustomization.yaml`, `**/rbac.yaml`, `**/*.sops.yaml` — so it needs an
+  approving review from a non-author, or an administrator's `/approve-override` **posted by
+  the operator**. An agent must not clear this one on its own PR; that is precisely the
+  self-approval the stage exists to prevent.
+- **No observability.** No metrics endpoint, no ServiceMonitor, no alert, and the namespace's
+  default-deny would drop a scrape from `monitoring` if one were added. Follow-ups are listed
+  in the plan, in the order they are worth doing.