2 Commits

Include renames

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
jakman85andClaude Opus 5.5	f65c12b395	feat(images): build on rootless BuildKit over mTLS; verification moves into Containerfile verify stages ... Operator decision on PR #81: no CI job may reach a privileged daemon. The act runner is untouched. - platform/buildkit (+ clusters/base/buildkit.yaml): moby/buildkit v0.34.1-rootless pinned by digest, uid 1000, not privileged; caps drop ALL + SETUID/SETGID, seccomp/AppArmor Unconfined, read-only rootfs (each measured under podman). cert-manager CA + server/client certs, ClusterIP :1234, default-deny with ingress only from the act-runner pod (DinD masquerades jobs to it). No Kyverno exception: every applied policy matches app-namespace=true only. - Each Containerfile names its shipped stage and ends in a `verify` stage holding every former `docker run` assertion (uid 65532, RUN --network=none, writable-path inventory standing in for the read-only rootfs). The old `&& echo` checks that could never fail are real assertions now. - images.sh drives buildkitd with a pinned buildx (sha256-checked) via bake; PRs build verify targets with agent-runner FROM the in-run toolbox (target: context); main verifies, then pushes. Fails loudly when the builder secrets are absent or buildkitd is unreachable. - infra/gitea/buildkit-client-secret.sh copies the client cert into Actions secrets. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <[email protected]>	2026-10-29 23:59:55 -05:00
jakman85andClaude Opus 5	c5b5b8672a	feat(pm-agent): an in-cluster AI Program Manager that turns Gitea issues into pull requests ... A service that reads this repository's Gitea issues, decides what to do about each thread as the Program Manager persona, and runs one worker agent per assignment that authors a change, runs the merge gate and opens a pull request. It reacts to issue creation and to comments; the assignment and all correspondence travel through the issue thread and the PR. It authenticates with an Anthropic subscription token. It never pushes to main and never merges. Three choices carry the design, with alternatives recorded in docs/plans/: - it POLLS rather than receiving webhooks (Gitea's webhook SSRF guard, lost deliveries, and no inbound reach needed at all); - it keeps NO state: the trigger is "the newest thing in this thread was not written by me", so the issue thread is the state — no PVC, no backup obligation; - the model holds NO tools: its reply is one JSON object this code validates, so nothing in the path executes text. The boundary is platform/kyverno/admission/pm-agent-job-shape.yaml (Enforce, failurePolicy: Fail), not the RBAC: Kubernetes places no `use` check on serviceAccountName, so "may create Jobs" is "may run arbitrary code as the namespace's most privileged identity". Six rules admit only the committed shape, and the worker identity is bound to nothing with no token mounted, so there is nothing to escalate to. 28/28 offline Kyverno assertions. Nothing has run: the image has never been built or pushed, and both the image digest and the two credentials are deliberate placeholders. See the handoff entry's "What I did NOT verify". Refs CLAUDE.md §1/§3/§6, R-SEC-02, R-GITOPS-02. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <[email protected]>	2026-10-05 22:28:10 -05:00