2 Commits

Include renames

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
jakman85andClaude Opus 5.5	e539109830	feat(images): build, verify and publish the three images in CI; Renovate carries the digests ... Operator rule 2026-10-29: image creation, hosting and lifecycle belong to CI/CD, never to a workstation build/push. Nothing had ever been pushed to the Gitea registry. - .gitea/workflows/images.yaml + scripts/images.sh: PRs build+verify (no credential); main builds, verifies and pushes toolbox, agent-runner (FROM toolbox) and conformance-runner as sha-<commit> + main, reading the digest back from the registry. Only changed images build. - Each image's own build-image.sh does the build and in-image verification, now engine-neutral (DinD: no podman-only calls, probe over stdin not a bind mount). New toolbox build-image.sh. - Digest references carry `# renovate-digest:` markers; renovate.json5 gains a custom.regex manager for them. The worker Job template is deliberately untracked (it would loop). - renovate.yaml pins renovate-version 44.167.0: the action's default (39.264.0) rejects the current config's managerFilePatterns, so every run would have died at CONFIG_VALIDATION. - Push credential: REGISTRY_PUSH_TOKEN secret; the Actions token has no package scope in Gitea 1.24.3 (container.go Authenticate). Retention: infra/gitea/registry-retention.sh. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <[email protected]>	2026-10-29 23:59:55 -05:00
jakman85andClaude Opus 5	c5b5b8672a	feat(pm-agent): an in-cluster AI Program Manager that turns Gitea issues into pull requests ... A service that reads this repository's Gitea issues, decides what to do about each thread as the Program Manager persona, and runs one worker agent per assignment that authors a change, runs the merge gate and opens a pull request. It reacts to issue creation and to comments; the assignment and all correspondence travel through the issue thread and the PR. It authenticates with an Anthropic subscription token. It never pushes to main and never merges. Three choices carry the design, with alternatives recorded in docs/plans/: - it POLLS rather than receiving webhooks (Gitea's webhook SSRF guard, lost deliveries, and no inbound reach needed at all); - it keeps NO state: the trigger is "the newest thing in this thread was not written by me", so the issue thread is the state — no PVC, no backup obligation; - the model holds NO tools: its reply is one JSON object this code validates, so nothing in the path executes text. The boundary is platform/kyverno/admission/pm-agent-job-shape.yaml (Enforce, failurePolicy: Fail), not the RBAC: Kubernetes places no `use` check on serviceAccountName, so "may create Jobs" is "may run arbitrary code as the namespace's most privileged identity". Six rules admit only the committed shape, and the worker identity is bound to nothing with no token mounted, so there is nothing to escalate to. 28/28 offline Kyverno assertions. Nothing has run: the image has never been built or pushed, and both the image digest and the two credentials are deliberate placeholders. See the handoff entry's "What I did NOT verify". Refs CLAUDE.md §1/§3/§6, R-SEC-02, R-GITOPS-02. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <[email protected]>	2026-10-05 22:28:10 -05:00