2 Commits

Include renames

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
jakman85andClaude Opus 5	234cc6a71a	docs(gitea): a skipped job reports SUCCESS, not pending -- correct the deadlock claim ... The runner came up on 2026-09-29 and the first CI jobs this repo has ever run went green, which falsified a claim merged in #2. MEASURED: gate / gate (pull_request) success 1m58s (PR 1), 1m34s (PR 2) gate / gate (push) success 1m32s (PR 2 only) gate / conformance (pull_request) success "Has been skipped" #2 said listing the conformance context as a required check would deadlock every PR, because the job is `if: false` and never runs. That is wrong. Gitea reports a skipped job as SUCCESS. Requiring it would not deadlock anything -- it would pass VACUOUSLY, forever, while nothing ran. The conclusion is unchanged (never require it) but the reason inverts, and the corrected reason matters more: under HARD RULE 4 a permanently-green check that verifies nothing is worse than a deadlock. A deadlock is loud. This is the exact fail-open shape the 2026-09-18 audit and this one both keep finding. Also records that the (push) contexts only appear for branches matching gate.yml's push trigger -- feature/**, fix/**, docs/**, chore/** -- and NOT feat/**, which is why PR 1's feat/ branch produced only pull_request contexts. Require the pull_request context alone, or PRs from non-matching prefixes never satisfy the rule. CLAUDE.md's enforcement table is updated: the runner half is genuinely fixed and observed green, the branch-protection half is not. Adds the warning that a green tick is not by itself evidence that anything ran. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <[email protected]>	2026-09-29 01:07:13 -05:00
jakman85andClaude Opus 5	5a9e455149	docs: delivery contract for agents + record that the merge gate does not exist ... Going to land the plex claim wiring through the documented PR flow surfaced that the flow has never run. PR #1 is the first pull request this repo has ever had. Verified against the live Gitea, not inferred from the docs: * branch_protections is [] -- main is protected:false, enable_status_check:false, status_check_contexts:[], required_approvals:0, user_can_push:true * ZERO Actions runners registered at repo, org and site level DECISIONS-LOG 2026-08-31 asserts a "required status check" and a runner "incluster-dind online". Both are false of the live system. The gate is neither enforced nor able to run, and that went unnoticed because the log claimed otherwise -- the same fail-open class as the two holes found on 2026-09-18. Adds CLAUDE.md, the first agent-facing delivery doc here: the branch -> PR -> gate -> approval -> merge rule, stated alongside the honest fact that enforcement is currently weaker than the rule, so agents follow the rule rather than what they can get away with. Carries the toolbox gate invocation, the two git-worktree workarounds, the rc 0/1/3 contract, and secret handling. Records the ordering trap: enabling a required status check before a runner exists deadlocks every PR permanently, including the one that would fix it. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <[email protected]>	2026-09-29 00:11:58 -05:00