Commit Graph
2 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
jakman85andClaude Opus 5 0749562ad0 docs(decisions): record the rebase and the README merge decision
gate / gate (pull_request) Successful in 1m36s
gate / conformance (pull_request) Has been skipped
#18 has landed, so this branch's "PR #18 must merge first" caveat was stale --
corrected to say what is now true and, more importantly, what is still NOT:
no image has been built or pushed, so the digest this branch pins resolves to
nothing.

Also records the one real conflict the rebase hit and how it was resolved.
#18's README carried a blockquote saying the 4th admission rule pinning the
init container's command "is not in this branch". It IS in this branch
(trigger-initcontainers-must-be-the-committed-clone-step, plus the
ephemeralContainers and env/envFrom rules beside it), so keeping #18's wording
would have left main documenting an open hole that had just been closed.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <[email protected]>
2026-09-29 23:04:26 -05:00
jakman85andClaude Opus 5 76b265cd62 docs(decisions): the PR #20 handoff moves out of DECISIONS-LOG.md into its own file
The ~400-line append this branch made to DECISIONS-LOG.md's tail is what made PR #20
unmergeable: every concurrent branch appends to the same last hunk, and on 2026-09-29
four of the five open PRs conflicted on that one file and nothing else. The prose is
unchanged in substance -- it moves to decisions/2026-09-29-conformance-job-template.md,
the one-file-per-handoff layout PR #24 introduces -- and DECISIONS-LOG.md is no longer
touched by this branch at all.

Carried over in full, including every caveat: the initContainers/ephemeralContainers/env
finding and its measurements, the fixture matrix (65 pass / 13 fail / 0 error / 0 skip),
the hardcoded-clone-URL reasoning, the args shapes that cannot run in-cluster, the
`approval-policy` check that does not exist, and all of the UNVERIFIED items -- nothing
has executed against a cluster, the runner image and Secret do not exist, PR #18 must
merge first, and whether the API server even accepts ephemeralContainers in a Job pod
template is still unestablished.

One claim was WEAKENED rather than restated, per ci/l0.sh's own lesson: `kyverno test`
exits 0 and prints "N tests passed" even when a policy FAILS TO LOAD (every row becomes
Skip / Invalid Policy), which was measured while authoring this very policy. The entry
now says explicitly that the admission proofs rest on `kyverno apply`'s `error: 0,
skip: 0` counts, not on any exit code, and that a green l0 line would not by itself have
established that these rules loaded.

Format is decisions/README.md's: frontmatter (date, branch, title) plus the three
sections ci/decisions-log.sh enforces. The branch is rebased onto main at c59fe9f,
after #24 merged, so that stage is in the base and DID run against this entry.

Gate (toolbox, DEV_KUBECONFIG=/dev/null + ENGINE shim): spec-immutability, decisions-log
(archive frozen, 2 entries well-formed), lint (404 files), l0, render-golden (10),
l1 all green; gitea-settings SKIPPED (no SETTINGS_API_TOKEN) and conformance L2/L3
SKIPPED (CLUSTER_AVAILABLE unset); MERGE GATE UNDETERMINED -- stages that did not run:
gitea-settings -- rc 3. Nothing FAILED, and rc 3 is not green.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <[email protected]>
2026-09-29 23:02:16 -05:00