Commit Graph
3 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
jakman85andClaude Opus 5 2acfed460a fix(vpn-ingress): content-hash the peer register, or a merged peer never reaches the tunnel
gate / gate (pull_request) Successful in 1m52s
gate / conformance (pull_request) Has been skipped
The operator enrolled a phone, merged the peer, and `wg show` listed none.
Measured on prod 2026-10-06 with the peer already on main:

  live wg-peers ConfigMap, active AllowedIPs .. 0
  DaemonSet volume reference ................. configMap.name: wg-peers (FIXED)
  DaemonSet generation/observedGeneration .... 1 / 1   (never rolled)
  init container, all three pods ............. "0 peer(s)"

Part of it was just the 10m reconcile interval. The defect is the fixed name:
Flux updates a fixed-name ConfigMap IN PLACE, so the pod template is
byte-identical, so no rollout is triggered -- and the init container assembles
wg0.conf ONCE at pod start into a tmpfs, so the running tunnel keeps the old
peer list indefinitely. Adding or revoking a peer had no effect until something
unrelated restarted the pods. For a REVOCATION that is a security defect, not
an inconvenience: delete a stanza, see a green PR, device keeps working.

The runbook and README both claimed "PR -> merge -> Flux rolls the DaemonSet".
Never true. And this repo already documents the fix, in a file I had read --
runbooks/kustomization.yaml: "The generated name carries kustomize's content
hash, so editing any runbook rolls the server automatically and a stale
projection is impossible."

So: peers.yaml (inline ConfigMap) -> peers.conf (plain file) + a
configMapGenerator. The operator's enrolled peer is carried across verbatim.
Every line is WireGuard config and `#` is a legal comment there, so the
documentation now lives inside the file that is actually mounted.

`namespace: vpn-ingress` on the kustomization is REQUIRED, not tidiness: a
generated ConfigMap inherits no namespace, everything else here declares
vpn-ingress, and kustomize's nameReference will not rewrite across a namespace
boundary -- without it the build mounts the unhashed name and the pods wedge on
a missing volume. Caught only by building the output and reading the volumes.

new-peer.sh: PEERS_FILE repointed, and a missing register is now FATAL rather
than skipped -- the old `[ -r "$PEERS_FILE" ] && grep ...` guard meant that
after the rename the only symptom would have been duplicate detection quietly
never firing again. Stale peers.yaml references swept from six files including
the script's own user-facing output.

Verified: the DaemonSet now mounts wg-peers-m9kcckcb5t; the hash tracks content
(edit -> dgg7ht9c74 -> restore -> m9kcckcb5t); the enrolled peer is byte-identical
to main's; and `new-peer.sh dupe 2` is now correctly refused by the operator's
real allocation.

No sensitive paths; merges on a green gate.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <[email protected]>
2026-10-06 02:55:59 -05:00
jakman85andClaude Opus 5 e35612dc7e fix(vpn-ingress): keep the server key in source through SOPS, not as an out-of-band Secret
gate / gate (pull_request) Failing after 1m51s
gate / conformance (pull_request) Has been skipped
Operator correction: secrets are kept in source through sops. #55 shipped the
WireGuard server private key as a Secret to `kubectl create` by hand. Two real
costs, not just a convention break:

  * R-SEC-01 / spec docs/07 -- secrets live in source, SOPS-encrypted, and
    reach the cluster only through Flux.
  * It broke DR for the one credential that cannot be re-derived. A rebuild
    restores everything in git; it does not restore a hand-made Secret, and
    losing this key means re-enrolling EVERY device, because each client
    profile pins its public half. #55 papered over that with "keep a copy in
    your password manager".

(Note secret-provenance did NOT forbid the original shape -- it scopes to
app-namespace=true and vpn-ingress is deliberately a platform namespace. The
rule broken was the written requirement, not an enforced control.)

An agent still must not mint a long-lived private key (CLAUDE.md §6), so the
file is committed ALREADY ENCRYPTED with `privatekey: REPLACE-ME`. That makes
the wiring complete and green from the first commit -- resource line plus both
overlay decryption patches -- leaving the operator exactly one act: replace the
value. A commented-out resource to uncomment later is the "in git, no generator
entry, reviewed, merged, still broken" shape this repo keeps hitting.

The init guard is now a validation rather than an emptiness check: the value is
piped through `wg pubkey`, which accepts only a real curve25519 private key, and
the pod names which case it hit -- placeholder, empty, mangled, or (the silent
one) still `ENC[` ciphertext because an overlay is missing its decryption patch,
which otherwise applies cleanly with every Flux condition green.

Second, independent finding that also fixes #55's step 2: `wg` is on the HOST
only and `sops` is in the CONTAINER only, so `sops -d | wg pubkey` cannot run in
one shell -- the command #55 documented could not have worked. Every step is now
split by where it runs, and the written key is verified by comparing sha256
digests rather than printing anything. `qrencode` is on neither, so the QR step
says so and gives the install command.

Touches clusters/** and adds a **/*.sops.yaml, so approval-policy will block
pending the operator's /approve-override. Deliberately not posted by me.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <[email protected]>
2026-10-05 23:55:29 -05:00
jakman85andClaude Opus 5 f92707f38c feat(vpn-ingress): WireGuard remote access on udp/51820 (hostNetwork, declarative peers)
gate / gate (pull_request) Successful in 1m47s
gate / conformance (pull_request) Has been skipped
Lets the operator's Android / Linux / Windows / macOS devices dial in from
anywhere and behave like LAN machines: full reach to 192.168.2.0/24 plus
internet egress out the house WAN. Opposite direction to platform/vpn-egress,
which sends pods OUT through PIA; the two share nothing but the word "VPN".

WireGuard because it is the only option with a first-party client on all four
named platforms, and because its handshake MAC is keyed with the responder's
own public key: an unauthenticated packet gets NO reply, so udp/51820 is
indistinguishable from a closed port. That, not "it is encrypted", is what
makes an unfiltered WAN port defensible, and why there is no source allowlist.

hostNetwork: true is REQUIRED, not convenient. A pod-networked server must SNAT
clients to its own pod IP, so every remote client would carry that pod's Cilium
identity -- and a pod-sourced request to the shared Gateway VIP returns 403 from
Envoy for ALL 16 hostnames (measured 2026-10-04), because Cilium's Gateway
preserves the original source identity and enforces the destination's ingress
policy. The obvious build would have shipped a healthy-looking tunnel on which
every cluster web UI was 403 and *.home.keithjackson.dev did not even resolve.
In the host netns traffic is SNATed to the node and arrives as host/remote-node,
exactly like a LAN client. It also sidesteps the unsafe ip_forward sysctl, the
L2-announcement lease lottery, and double encapsulation (hence MTU 1420).
Permitted by restrict-host-namespaces' own carve-out for platform namespaces.
The cost is stated in networkpolicy.yaml rather than papered over: no
NetworkPolicy constrains a hostNetwork pod.

A DaemonSet so the hand-made WAN forward cannot be invalidated by a reschedule;
all three nodes answer the same keys, so failover is a one-line router change.

Peer PUBLIC keys are plaintext in peers.yaml, which makes "who can get into my
house" a reviewable PR diff. The only secret -- the server's private key -- is
an out-of-band Secret: an agent must not mint a long-lived private key, and the
two halves are joined only at pod start into a tmpfs that dies with the pod.

Ships INERT-BUT-HEALTHY with zero peers. THREE off-repo manual steps remain
(kernel module, server key, WAN forward) -- runbooks/vpn-remote-access.md.

Touches clusters/** , so ci/approval-policy.sh will block pending the
operator's /approve-override. Deliberately not posted by me (CLAUDE.md §1).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <[email protected]>
2026-10-05 22:29:46 -05:00