docs(auth): record what PR #30's CI actually ran, not what its tick said

Read the commit's /statuses rather than the check mark:

  gate / gate (pull_request)         state=success  desc='Successful in 1m41s'
  gate / conformance (pull_request)  state=success  desc='Has been skipped'

The second is CLAUDE.md 2b's trap in the wild -- a SKIPPED Gitea job reports
state=success, so that green tick certifies nothing. It agrees exactly with
the local rc 3: the offline L0/L1 subset passed, L2/L3 never ran. Anyone
reading the PR's check mark alone would conclude the opposite.

Also re-measured branch protection instead of trusting the table in CLAUDE.md:
GET /repos/.../branches/main -> protected=true, user_can_push=false.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <[email protected]>

decisions/2026-09-30-flux-deploy-notification-inhibited.md

@@ -0,0 +1,95 @@
+---
+date: 2026-09-30
+branch: fix/flux-deploy-notification-inhibited
+title: The deploy notification routed correctly and was then inhibited before sending — `severity: info` is a suppressed class in kube-prometheus-stack
+---
+
+## What changed
+
+`FluxRolloutInProgress` (shipped hours earlier in PR #25) fired correctly on the very first real
+deploy and **its mail was suppressed before Alertmanager sent it**. One label changed:
+
+- `platform/monitoring/alerts.yaml` — `FluxRolloutInProgress` now carries `notification: deploy` and
+  **no `severity` label at all**, where it previously carried `severity: info`.
+- `platform/monitoring/kube-prometheus-stack.yaml` — the deploy route matches
+  `notification = "deploy"` instead of `severity = "info"`. Receiver, subject and grouping unchanged.
+- `platform/monitoring/tests/flux-rollout.test.yaml` — the three `FluxRolloutInProgress` `exp_labels`
+  blocks updated. `FluxRolloutStuck` keeps `severity: warning` and is unaffected.
+
+**The mechanism, measured rather than reasoned about.** kube-prometheus-stack's `general.rules`
+ships:
+
+    InfoInhibitor:
+      group by (namespace) (ALERTS{severity="info"} == 1)
+        unless on (namespace) group by (namespace)
+          (ALERTS{alertname!="InfoInhibitor", alertstate="firing", severity=~"warning|critical"} == 1)
+
+which fires for any namespace holding a firing `severity="info"` alert **and nothing else wrong in
+it**. The chart's third `inhibit_rule` then drops exactly that alert:
+
+    source_matchers: [alertname="InfoInhibitor"]
+    target_matchers: [severity="info"]
+    equal:           [namespace]
+
+For a deploy notification this is the worst possible interaction, because the suppressed case is the
+*only* case that matters: on a healthy rollout of a healthy cluster, `flux-system` holds no warning
+or critical alert, so `InfoInhibitor` fires and the deploy mail is inhibited. It would have been
+delivered only when something else in `flux-system` was already broken.
+
+Upstream's intent is explicit and reasonable — `severity: info` means "only worth showing next to a
+real problem". A deploy notice is not that, so it must not claim that severity. `notification` is a
+label **no** `inhibit_rule` in the chart targets (all three match on severity values), and dropping
+`severity` also stops `InfoInhibitor` firing for `flux-system` at all rather than merely working
+around it. Both files carry the full reasoning inline, and `alerts.yaml`'s design header now names
+the severity label as a third thing that must not regress — "do not tidy this by adding a severity"
+— because the next reader's instinct will be to add one back.
+
+## What I verified
+
+Against live prod, after PR #25 merged as `64c72fd` and Flux converged:
+
+- **The metrics work.** `kube_flux_kustomization_info` 16, `kube_flux_kustomization_suspended` 16,
+  `kube_flux_gitrepository_info` 1 = **33 series, exactly as designed**. The `revision` label IS
+  populated (`main@sha1:296d6d3…` / `…64c72fd…`), so the `status.lastAppliedRevision` /
+  `status.artifact.revision` paths are correct — previously UNVERIFIED.
+- **The `podAnnotations` roll mechanism works.** The KSM pod carries
+  `homelab.keithjackson.dev/crs-config-rollout: 1` and is a new pod
+  (`…-7b56d98f46-56n8j`, replacing the 2026-09-19 one), so the config-only-change trap was
+  genuinely closed rather than merely documented.
+- **The rule works, in both directions.** It fired for **12** lagging Kustomizations while 4 had
+  converged (`count by (revision)` → 12 old / 4 new), each alert carrying its own `name` and
+  `revision`; then the rollout converged (`count(count by (revision) (…))` → **1**) and the alert
+  **cleared**. Firing and self-clearing are both confirmed on real data, which is the completion
+  notification's whole mechanism.
+- **The routing works.** `amtool config routes` shows
+  `{notification="deploy"} → receiver: email-deploy` under the default route, and
+  `amtool config routes test notification=deploy` returns `email-deploy`.
+- **The inhibition was real.** `InfoInhibitor` went active `2026-09-30T04:58:48Z` — the same moment
+  the alert began firing — and `amtool alert query` showed **no** `FluxRolloutInProgress` in
+  Alertmanager, active or `--inhibited`. `alertmanager_notifications_failed_total{integration=email}`
+  is 0 for every reason, so nothing failed to send; it was never dispatched.
+- promtool: **SUCCESS**, 53 rules, 6 scenarios, promtool 3.14.0 in the pinned toolbox.
+
+## What I did NOT verify
+
+- **No deploy mail has been observed in the inbox — this fix is UNVERIFIED end to end.** The
+  suppression was proven (nothing in Alertmanager, zero send failures) and the routing was proven
+  (`amtool config routes test` → `email-deploy`), but the delivered message is not. It can only be
+  proven by merging this and watching the next commit produce `[FLUX] applying` and then
+  `[FLUX] applied`. Same structural gap as PR #25, one layer further along.
+- **Whether the single email during the window was ours.**
+  `alertmanager_notifications_total{integration="email"}` went 226 → 227 while other alerts
+  (`Watchdog`, `CNPGPrimariesCoLocated`) were also active, and that counter carries no receiver
+  label, so the increment cannot be attributed. I am NOT claiming our mail was or was not sent — the
+  attribution is genuinely unavailable from this metric.
+- **Whether `InfoInhibitor` interacts with `FluxRolloutStuck`.** Stuck is `severity: warning`;
+  inhibit_rule 1 (`critical` → `warning|info`) requires an equal `alertname`, so it should not
+  apply — reasoned, not measured. Worth confirming the first time a rollout genuinely hangs.
+- **The `[FLUX] applying|applied` subject template** is still untested; `.Status` is assumed to be
+  `firing`/`resolved` in the notification template data.
+- **`required_approvals` disagreement, unresolved and not mine to settle.** Live branch protection
+  reads `required_approvals: 1`, while the `ci/gate.sh` comment introduced by PR #17 describes the
+  model as `required_approvals: 0` ("the gate is the approver"). `ci/gitea-settings.sh` may report
+  this as drift against `infra/gitea/expected-branch-protection.json`. Flagged only.
+- **The drift loop is still unexplained.** Five Kustomizations re-applying the same object every
+  10 minutes (event counts ~2500) — untouched, cause unknown, still deserves its own branch.

decisions/2026-09-30-jackett-oauth2-proxy-session.md

@@ -0,0 +1,273 @@
+---
+date: 2026-09-30
+branch: fix/jackett-oauth2-proxy-session
+title: Jackett — radarr's oauth2-proxy deletes jackett's session cookie; the fix cannot be made per-app
+---
+
+## What changed
+
+Reported as *"GET requests work, but most PUT/POST requests to add indexers fail. Reloading the page
+never fixes it, and I am never re-prompted for login if it is a login issue."*
+
+**This branch lands the diagnosis and a runbook. It does NOT land the manifest fix, and that is a
+deliberate stop, not an omission** — see *The fix has one home and it is shared*, below.
+
+Three mechanisms, all measured. **Weighting matters here, so it is stated up front:** mechanisms 2
+and 3 are demonstrated from Jackett's own access log and **between them fully explain the report as
+written** — PUT/POST fail, the operator is never re-prompted, and a reload does not help. Mechanism 1
+is a real, firing defect that Jackett genuinely violates, and it explains the *intermittency* on top;
+I demonstrate the mechanism and one three-second causal adjacency, not a population of them. Fix all
+three; do not rest the case on the first.
+
+**1. Cookie collision — the mechanism is firing, and Jackett is a genuine violator.** Six oauth2-proxy
+instances (seven pods) emit oauth2-proxy's **default** cookie name `_oauth2_proxy` scoped to
+`.home.keithjackson.dev` while holding seven **different** cookie-secrets. The ping-pong is in two
+pods' own logs, interleaved to the second:
+
+    15:23:17  radarr   [AuthSuccess]                                   -> radarr writes _oauth2_proxy
+    15:23:44  jackett  "cookie signature not valid, removing session"  -> re-login #1
+    15:23:58  radarr   "cookie signature not valid, removing session"  -> radarr DELETES jackett's
+    15:27:17  jackett  [AuthSuccess]                                   -> re-login #2
+    15:27:59  radarr   "cookie signature not valid, removing session"
+    15:31:06  jackett  [AuthSuccess]                                   -> re-login #3
+    15:31:29  radarr   "cookie signature not valid, removing session"  <- deletes it again
+    15:31:32  jackett  "No valid authentication in request"            <- 3 SECONDS later, no cookie
+
+`removing session` is oauth2-proxy calling ClearSession, which expires the cookie on **its own**
+`--cookie-domain` — the whole zone. So jackett's session is not merely overwritten, it is **deleted
+by a process in another namespace**, 26 s after a clean login whose own `expires` was five minutes
+out. That is the answer to the open question in the brief ("26 s is well inside the 5-minute window,
+so plain expiry does not explain it"): it was never expiry, and it was never Jackett.
+
+It also explains the half of the report that looked like user error. **Reloading genuinely does not
+help**, because the operator's Radarr tab re-clears the cookie seconds after each new login — and
+Radarr is not a passive tab. Its UI polls: of 156 unauthenticated requests in its log against
+**1** AuthSuccess, the top paths are `/api/v3/command` (62), `/api/v3/queue/details` (46) and
+`/signalr/messages/negotiate` (43). Every one of those polls, arriving with a cookie Radarr cannot
+decrypt, calls ClearSession again. **A left-open Radarr tab is a cookie-deletion engine firing every
+few seconds**, which is why Jackett's sessions die at irregular, short, apparently random intervals.
+
+**A counter-hypothesis was put to me and it does not survive bounding.** The observation was that
+Crafty already carries this fix yet showed the platform's worst failure ratio (81:1 over 24 h from
+Loki), implying the fix does not work. But Crafty's pod started **2026-09-30T03:57:19Z with 0
+restarts**, so a 24 h window is ~10 h of the *pre-fix* pod. Rather than bound it in Loki I read the
+ratio off the pod's own log, whose boundary is the process start and therefore exact: **inside the
+fixed pod's entire 13 h 52 m lifetime, Crafty logged 3 `No valid authentication` events, not 81** —
+from one client IP, two of them WebSocket `/ws` reconnects, in two isolated minutes (04:02 and
+15:22), against 0 AuthSuccess because nobody signed in. Post-fix Crafty is idle, not broken. The
+ratio metric is confounded by endpoint type — apps that poll or hold WebSockets (Radarr, Crafty)
+manufacture failure lines at their retry rate — so it ranks *chattiness*, not breakage. Correctly
+bounded, Crafty is evidence **for** the fix.
+
+**2. Session lifetime pinned to a 5-minute access token.** Measured from the sidecar's own
+`[AuthSuccess]`: `created:15:31:06.391860254` / `expires:` + **300.000 s** exactly, with
+`refresh_token:true` on the same line. `--cookie-refresh` is unset and its default is `0`
+(disabled), so the proxy holds a refresh token it has no mandate to spend.
+
+**3. XHRs answered with 302 instead of 401 — why none of it was visible.** oauth2-proxy's built-in
+AJAX guard fires only on an **exact** `Accept: application/json`, which Jackett's jQuery does not
+consistently send. Measured on `/api/` paths in this pod's log: **33 × 302 against 2 × 401**, and the
+split runs straight through Jackett's own POSTs (`/api/v2.0/server/adminpassword` → 401,
+`/api/v2.0/server/update` → 302). A 302 on an unauthenticated XHR is followed invisibly by the
+browser, satisfied silently by the live Keycloak SSO session, and resolves with HTML where the
+JavaScript expected JSON — no prompt, no error. On a write it is worse: a browser following a 302
+re-issues a POST as a **GET and drops the body**, so the indexer configuration is discarded with
+nothing logged as a failure anywhere.
+
+### The fix has one home, and it is shared — this is the blocker
+
+The brief assigned me `apps/wave-0/jackett.yaml` as exclusively mine, and assigned the other four
+apps to a sibling branch. **That split is not implementable, and I found out by trying it.**
+
+`apps/wave-0/jackett.yaml` is a **generated golden**. The sidecar's argument list is built by one
+shared function, `_oauth2_sidecar_container()` in `catalog/render.py`. `catalog/jackett.yaml`
+declares only `auth.mode` and `auth.groups`, and the `auth` schema is `additionalProperties: false`
+— **there is no per-app override hook**. I wrote the fix into the rendered file first; the merge
+gate rejected it exactly as designed:
+
+    [fail] GOLDEN DRIFT: apps/wave-0/jackett.yaml does not match the canonical render
+    [fail] stage render-golden: FAIL          ->  MERGE GATE: BLOCKED   (rc 1)
+
+So I made the change at its real source instead and **measured the blast radius** before committing
+to it. A change confined to that one function rewrites the sidecar block in **all five** rendered
+apps, and `render-golden` requires all five be regenerated in the same commit:
+
+    CHANGED: apps/wave-0/jackett.yaml
+    CHANGED: apps/wave-0/pihole.yaml
+    CHANGED: apps/wave-0/qbittorrent.yaml
+    CHANGED: apps/wave-1/radarr.yaml
+    CHANGED: apps/wave-1/sonarr.yaml
+
+Four of those five are the files I was explicitly told not to touch, and all four are being edited
+right now on `fix/oauth2-proxy-cookie-collision-fleet`. **The gate and the ownership boundary are in
+direct contradiction**: I cannot fix Jackett's sidecar without regenerating four files another
+branch owns, and two branches rewriting the same generated block across five files is precisely the
+cross-branch conflict this repo's §7 exists to prevent.
+
+I stopped rather than force it. **The cookie fix is one change, not five**, and it should be re-cut
+as a single renderer commit on one branch. The intended content, validated below:
+
+    --cookie-name=_oauth2_proxy_{name}        # per-app, derived
+    --cookie-domain={host}                    # host-scoped, derived
+    --whitelist-domain=.{ZONE}                # unchanged: redirect targets, not cookie scope
+    --cookie-refresh=2m30s                    # half the measured 300 s token lifetime
+    (drop --pass-access-token, --set-xauthrequest)
+
+`--api-route=^/api/` is the one flag I would **not** apply renderer-wide on this evidence: I
+measured the 302/401 split on Jackett only, and PiHole's UI does not serve `/api/` at all. It needs
+either a per-app hook or four more measurements.
+
+**Metrics — asked for, and declined here for the same structural reason, not on merit.** It is true
+and I re-measured it: **no per-app sidecar exposes metrics**. Only the shared proxy carries
+`--metrics-address=0.0.0.0:44180` and a `metrics` container port; jackett, pihole, qbittorrent,
+radarr, sonarr and crafty all have `(ABSENT)` and ports `['http']` alone, so the listener never
+starts and nothing about these gates is scrapable. Adding it is worth doing and the pattern is
+already proven in-tree by the shared proxy. But it is **not** "inside my file": the container's
+`args` *and* its `ports` both come from `_oauth2_sidecar_container()`, so adding
+`--metrics-address` plus a `metrics` port hits the identical five-file blast radius as the cookie
+change. It belongs in the same single renderer commit — which is an argument for cutting that commit
+soon, not for me to hand-edit a golden a second time after the gate already refused the first.
+(Crafty is separately hand-written and could take the metrics flag on its own.)
+
+**Crafty is unaffected by all of this** — its sidecar is hand-written in
+`platform/crafty/deployment.yaml`, not rendered, which is why it could be and was fixed alone on
+2026-09-29.
+
+### What this branch does land
+
+`runbooks/oauth2-proxy-session.md` — the four sidecar log lines that tell Keycloak, the sidecar and
+the app's own login apart (including the upstream `-` field that means the proxy answered a request
+the app never saw), the cookie-collision cross-log diagnosis, the 5-minute-session check, the
+302-vs-401 trap, and the generated-golden warning with its measured blast radius. Registered in the
+runbooks `configMapGenerator` **and** listed in `runbooks/README.md`, so the URL resolves rather
+than the file merely existing.
+
+## What I verified
+
+- **The collision is the live failure.** `[stored_session.go:94] Error loading cookied session:
+  cookie signature not valid, removing session` — **1 occurrence in jackett's log (15:23:44), 8 in
+  radarr's** (15:22:49, 15:23:58, 15:27:59, **15:31:29**, 15:32:29 ×4), and **zero** in pihole,
+  qbittorrent, sonarr, crafty and both shared-proxy replicas. The 15:31:29 → 15:31:32 pair is the
+  operator's whole report.
+- **Six instances / seven pods are in the collision set** — the brief said five; the shared
+  forward-auth proxy in namespace `oauth2-proxy` is the sixth and runs 2 replicas. Read from live
+  pod specs: jackett, pihole, qbittorrent, radarr, sonarr and `oauth2-proxy` all have **no**
+  `--cookie-name` argument and `--cookie-domain=.home.keithjackson.dev`. Only crafty is fixed.
+- **All seven cookie-secrets differ.** Compared in-cluster by sha256, first 12 hex only, values
+  never printed: `d9c5…`/`0b3b…`/`b025…`/`bb6a…`/`25f4…`/`e679…`/`911a…`. So no two of these proxies
+  can read each other's cookie — the precondition for the eviction.
+- **The 5-minute lifetime**, from four `[AuthSuccess]` lines: `expires − created = 300.000 s`, with
+  `refresh_token:true` and `groups:[platform-admins]`. Live args confirm `--cookie-refresh` absent.
+- **The 302/401 split** on `/api/` paths in this pod's log: 33 × 302, 18 × 200, 2 × 401, 2 × 204.
+- **4 of the 6 POSTs never reached Jackett** — the access log's upstream field is `-`, not `/`:
+  `adminpassword` → 401, `adminpassword` → 401, `server/update` → 302, `server/update` → 302. The
+  two that did reach it (`adminpassword`, `indexers/1337x/config`) carry the authenticated email.
+- **The proposed argument list starts, against the pinned image and the real issuer.** Ran
+  `quay.io/oauth2-proxy/oauth2-proxy:v7.8.1` locally with the full proposed args; OIDC discovery
+  against `keycloak.home.keithjackson.dev` succeeded and it printed back its own reading:
+  `Cookie settings: name:_oauth2_proxy_jackett secure(https):true httponly:true expiry:168h0m0s
+  domains:jackett.home.keithjackson.dev path:/ samesite: refresh:after 2m30s` and
+  `API route - Path: ^/api/`.
+- **`--api-route` is singular.** The brief specified `--api-routes`, which does not exist in v7.8.1;
+  the proxy would have refused to start. Read off `--help`.
+- **`--session-cookie-minimal` is mutually exclusive with `--cookie-refresh`** — provoked, not
+  assumed: `invalid configuration: cookie_refresh > 0 requires oauth tokens in sessions.
+  session_cookie_minimal cannot be set`. This kills the brief's premise that dropping
+  `--pass-access-token` shrinks the cookie: only `--session-cookie-minimal` strips tokens from the
+  session, and it is unavailable while refresh is on. Dropping those two flags is justified on
+  **least privilege and inertness**, not size.
+- **`--set-xauthrequest` is inert here**: HTTPRoute `jackett-9117` backendRef is
+  `Service/jackett port 4180`, there is no ext-authz attachment on the `shared` Gateway, so
+  `/oauth2/auth` is never called.
+- **`apps/**` is generated and the fix cannot be scoped to one app** — both halves measured, not
+  inferred: the gate's `render-golden` stage rejected the hand-edit, and re-rendering after a
+  renderer-only change listed all five apps as changed (transcript above).
+- **Crafty's post-fix failure rate, bounded exactly.** Pod `crafty-647c7d8cc5-5spv9`,
+  `startTime=2026-09-30T03:57:19Z`, `restarts=0`, live args `--cookie-name=_oauth2_proxy_crafty` and
+  `--cookie-domain=crafty.home.keithjackson.dev`. Over that pod's whole lifetime: **3**
+  `No valid authentication`, 0 AuthSuccess, one client IP, 2 of the 3 on `/ws`. The 81:1 figure is a
+  24 h window over a 13.9 h pod and is dominated by the pre-fix process.
+- **The ratio metric ranks chattiness, not breakage.** Radarr 156:1 with the top paths being
+  `/api/v3/command`, `/api/v3/queue/details` and `/signalr/messages/negotiate` — UI polling, not 156
+  distinct user-visible failures.
+- **No per-app sidecar exposes metrics.** `--metrics-address` is `(ABSENT)` and `ports` is
+  `['http']` on all six per-app sidecars; only the shared proxy has
+  `--metrics-address=0.0.0.0:44180` and a `metrics` port.
+- **Gate:** `./ci/gate.sh` in the pinned toolbox, **rc 3 — UNDETERMINED, not green**. Green:
+  `spec-immutability`, `approval-policy`, `decisions-log`, `lint`, `l0`, `render-golden`, `l1`.
+  Skipped: `gitea-settings` (no `SETTINGS_API_TOKEN`) and L2/L3 conformance (`CLUSTER_AVAILABLE`
+  unset), leaving touched requirement `R-OBS-04` uncertified. Note `spec-immutability` is **green**,
+  not skipped — mounting the sibling spec repo at `/home-network-k3s` (the path
+  `ci/spec-immutability.sh` actually defaults to) in the ENGINE shim fixes that skip; the commonly
+  circulated shim mounts it at its host path, where `SPEC_REPO` never finds it.
+- **Gitea CI on this PR, read from the commit's `/statuses` rather than from a tick.** Two contexts
+  reported, and **only one of them ran**:
+
+      gate / gate (pull_request)         state=success   desc='Successful in 1m41s'
+      gate / conformance (pull_request)  state=success   desc='Has been skipped'
+
+  That second line is §2b's trap in the wild: a **skipped** Gitea job reports `state=success`. The
+  conformance job did not execute, so the green tick beside it certifies nothing. Read together with
+  the local rc 3 above, the two agree exactly — the offline L0/L1 subset passed and L2/L3 never ran.
+  Anyone reading the PR's check mark alone would conclude otherwise.
+- **`main` is protected**, re-measured this session rather than assumed:
+  `GET /repos/.../branches/main` → `protected=true`, `user_can_push=false`.
+
+## What I did NOT verify
+
+- **The operator's problem is NOT FIXED by this branch.** Only the diagnosis and the runbook land.
+  Jackett's sidecar is unchanged and will keep losing its session to Radarr until the renderer
+  change ships. **This is the single most important line in this entry.**
+- **No browser round-trip.** Every mechanism is measured from logs and specs and the argument list
+  is proven to start, but nobody has added an indexer through the proposed configuration. The human
+  test is below, for whoever lands the renderer change.
+- **Nothing was applied.** No `kubectl apply/edit/patch`, no `flux reconcile`. The running pod is
+  still `jackett-c5bfcbfb8-c75f9` (2/2 Running, 17 d, 0 restarts — unchanged by this session's
+  read-only probes). Note that when the fix does land, merging is what deploys, and it will restart
+  the pod (`strategy: Recreate` on an RWO Longhorn volume), briefly interrupting Radarr's and
+  Sonarr's direct `:9117` access.
+- **Cookie size and chunking: UNMEASURED, and I will not claim either way.** I could not read a
+  `Set-Cookie` header without a browser. I found no `_oauth2_proxy_0`/`_1` chunk evidence and no
+  4 kB warning in 36,287 log lines — but I did **not** establish that v7.8.1 emits such a warning at
+  this log level, so that absence is not evidence. If sessions still misbehave after the fix lands,
+  this is the next thing to measure, with `--session-store-type=redis` as the escape hatch, since
+  `--session-cookie-minimal` is ruled out (above).
+- **`--cookie-refresh=2m30s` has never executed a refresh here.** It depends on Keycloak accepting
+  the refresh token and on the realm's SSO Session Idle/Max, none of which I read (that needs admin
+  credentials). If Keycloak's *refresh* token is also short-lived, the five-minute logout persists
+  and the realm is where to look next.
+- **`--api-route` is measured for Jackett only.** PiHole and qBittorrent were not measured, and
+  PiHole's UI does not serve `/api/`. Do not apply it renderer-wide on my evidence.
+- **The four sibling apps still collide with each other** regardless of what happens to Jackett.
+  The same operator report should be expected from any of pihole / qbittorrent / radarr / sonarr.
+- **L2/L3 conformance did not run** (`CLUSTER_AVAILABLE` unset), so nothing about runtime behaviour
+  is certified by the gate. `gitea-settings` also skipped, so branch protection and runner state are
+  **unverified by me this session** — I did not re-measure them against the Gitea API.
+- **I did not query Loki.** The Crafty bounding above comes from the pod log, which I argue is the
+  better instrument (an exact process boundary rather than a wall-clock window against a 72 h
+  retention). But it means I cannot speak to the 24 h or 12 h *platform-wide* ratios, and a
+  per-app ratio over a window longer than the current pod's life is not something I measured at all.
+- **Collision causation is one adjacency, not a population.** The 15:31:29 → 15:31:32 pair is three
+  seconds and the mechanism is documented and present, but I did not enumerate every jackett failure
+  and match it to a radarr ClearSession. Treat mechanism 1 as **necessary and firing, not proven
+  sufficient** — the coordinator's framing, and I agree with it on this evidence.
+- **The metrics change is NOT in this branch** (reason above). Jackett therefore remains inside the
+  oauth2-proxy metrics gap, and the ratio alert shipped in PR #29 still cannot see it.
+- **The runbook's commands were not all executed verbatim.** The log-reading ones I ran; the
+  per-namespace `for` loops are edited from the scripted forms I actually used.
+
+### The human test — for whoever lands the renderer fix
+
+After it merges and the pod rolls (watch for a **new** pod name at 2/2):
+
+1. **Sign in** at `https://jackett.home.keithjackson.dev/UI/Dashboard`.
+2. **Open Radarr in a second tab** and sign in there too. **This is the step that breaks Jackett
+   today** — it is the 15:31:29 line. Return to the Jackett tab.
+3. **Add an indexer** — *+ Add indexer*, pick one, *Configure*, *Okay*. It must save.
+4. **Wait six minutes on the open dashboard, then save another.** That is the `--cookie-refresh`
+   test; the session currently dies at five.
+5. **If something does still fail, it must now fail LOUDLY** — DevTools → Network, a broken `/api/`
+   call shows **401**, not a 302 followed by HTML. A silent success-looking no-op means the change
+   did not take; check the running pod's args before assuming anything else.
+6. **A plain page reload must still sign you in silently** (`/UI/Dashboard` is outside `^/api/`).
+   A 401 page on reload means the regex is too broad — that is a regression.

platform/monitoring/alerts.yaml

@@ -839,6 +839,14 @@ spec:
         # that has never applied anything — or a GitRepository with no artifact yet — publishes the
         # series with no `revision` label. Without the matcher those group together under the empty
         # string and compare EQUAL, i.e. a never-applied Kustomization would read as converged.
+        #
+        # A THIRD THING THAT MUST NOT REGRESS — THE SEVERITY LABEL. These alerts are delivered
+        # because of the labels they do NOT carry as much as the ones they do. Do not "tidy" this
+        # pair by giving FluxRolloutInProgress a `severity`, and never `severity: info`: the chart's
+        # InfoInhibitor rule plus its `severity="info"` inhibit_rule suppress an info alert whenever
+        # it is the only thing firing in its namespace, which is every healthy deploy. Measured on
+        # prod 2026-09-30 — the alert fired correctly for 12 Kustomizations, resolved correctly, and
+        # was inhibited in between. The full reasoning is on the `notification: deploy` label below.
         # ===================================================================================
         - alert: FluxRolloutInProgress
           expr: |
@@ -857,7 +865,31 @@ spec:
           # `flux reconcile`, a change touching one Kustomization), and a deploy notification that
           # only sometimes arrives is worse than no notification at all.
           labels:
-            severity: info    # -> the email-deploy Alertmanager route; subject "[FLUX] applying/applied"
+            # ROUTED BY `notification`, AND DELIBERATELY CARRYING NO `severity` (fixed 2026-09-30).
+            # This alert originally used `severity: info`. That was WRONG, and wrong in the silent
+            # direction — measured on prod within minutes of the first real deploy.
+            # kube-prometheus-stack ships `general.rules` -> InfoInhibitor:
+            #     group by (namespace) (ALERTS{severity="info"} == 1)
+            #       unless on (namespace) group by (namespace)
+            #         (ALERTS{alertname!="InfoInhibitor", alertstate="firing", severity=~"warning|critical"} == 1)
+            # which fires for any namespace that has a firing info alert AND NOTHING ELSE WRONG in
+            # it; paired with the chart's inhibit_rule
+            #     source_matchers: [alertname="InfoInhibitor"]
+            #     target_matchers: [severity="info"]
+            #     equal: [namespace]
+            # the effect is that an info alert is suppressed EXACTLY WHEN it is the only thing
+            # happening in its namespace. For a deploy notification that is the only case that
+            # matters: on a healthy rollout of a healthy cluster, flux-system has no warning or
+            # critical alert, so InfoInhibitor fired and this alert never reached the receiver.
+            # Verified live: InfoInhibitor went active 2026-09-30T04:58:48Z, the same moment this
+            # alert began firing for 12 Kustomizations.
+            # Upstream's intent is explicit — `severity: info` means "only worth showing next to a
+            # real problem". A deploy notice is not that, so it must not claim that severity.
+            # `notification` is a label no inhibit_rule in the chart targets (all three match on
+            # severity values), and omitting `severity` also stops InfoInhibitor firing for
+            # flux-system at all. Route: platform/monitoring/kube-prometheus-stack.yaml matches
+            # `notification = "deploy"` -> the email-deploy receiver, subject "[FLUX] applying|applied".
+            notification: deploy
           annotations:
             summary: "Flux is applying a new revision — {{ $labels.name }} is behind main"
             description: "Kustomization {{ $labels.namespace }}/{{ $labels.name }} has applied {{ $labels.revision }}, which is not the revision the flux-system GitRepository has fetched from main. THIS MAIL MEANS A GIT CHANGE STARTED ROLLING OUT; the RESOLVED mail for this same alert means every Kustomization reached the new revision and the rollout is complete."

platform/monitoring/kube-prometheus-stack.yaml

@@ -139,11 +139,19 @@ spec:
             #
             # A DEDICATED ROUTE, because the default receiver is `email-warning`: without it a
             # routine deploy arrives subject-lined "[WARNING]" and becomes indistinguishable from a
-            # real platform fault, which is how alert mail stops being read at all. `severity: info`
+            # real platform fault, which is how alert mail stops being read at all.
-            # is used by NO other rule in this repo (grepped 2026-09-29: zero matches), so this
+            #
-            # route claims exactly the deploy notices and nothing else. Keep it that way — giving a
+            # MATCHES `notification`, NOT `severity` (corrected 2026-09-30). This route first read
-            # genuine fault severity: info would silently route it here and re-label it a deploy.
+            # `severity = "info"`, which routed correctly and then had the mail SUPPRESSED before it
-            - matchers: ['severity = "info"']
+            # was sent: the chart's own InfoInhibitor rule fires for any namespace holding a firing
+            # info alert with no warning/critical beside it, and its inhibit_rule
+            # (source alertname="InfoInhibitor" -> target severity="info", equal [namespace]) drops
+            # exactly that alert. A healthy deploy in a healthy flux-system is precisely that case,
+            # so the notification was inhibited on every occasion it was wanted. Measured live on
+            # prod 2026-09-30: InfoInhibitor went active at 04:58:48Z as the alert began firing.
+            # Routing on a non-severity label sidesteps all three of the chart's inhibit_rules,
+            # which match on severity values only. See the label's own comment in alerts.yaml.
+            - matchers: ['notification = "deploy"']
               receiver: email-deploy
               # One mail per ROLLOUT, not per Kustomization: the alert fires once per lagging
               # Kustomization (16 possible), and grouping on alertname alone collapses them into a

platform/monitoring/tests/flux-rollout.test.yaml

@@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ tests:
         alertname: FluxRolloutInProgress
         exp_alerts:
           - exp_labels:
-              severity: info
+              notification: deploy
               job: kube-state-metrics
               namespace: flux-system
               name: platform
@@ -148,7 +148,7 @@ tests:
         alertname: FluxRolloutInProgress
         exp_alerts:
           - exp_labels:
-              severity: info
+              notification: deploy
               job: kube-state-metrics
               namespace: flux-system
               name: platform
@@ -229,7 +229,7 @@ tests:
         alertname: FluxRolloutInProgress
         exp_alerts:
           - exp_labels:
-              severity: info
+              notification: deploy
               job: kube-state-metrics
               namespace: flux-system
               name: conformance

runbooks/README.md

@@ -115,6 +115,14 @@ Each affected runbook says so on its own page and gives the by-hand equivalent.
   plex.tv/claim — so it is a timed sequence, scripted as `infra/plex/claim-ship.sh`:
   token → `sops` → PR → gate → merge → **forced** `flux reconcile` → pod roll (~2m45s measured).
   Includes why a changed Secret does not restart anything, and why an expired token is harmless.
+- **`oauth2-proxy-session`** — a gated UI loads but its saves quietly do nothing, and you are never
+  re-prompted to log in. Tells the three stacked auth layers apart from the sidecar's own access log
+  (the four lines that matter, including the upstream `-` that means the proxy answered a request the
+  app never saw). Covers the cookie collision between per-app sidecars sharing the default
+  `_oauth2_proxy` name on `.home.keithjackson.dev` — which deletes sessions belonging to apps in
+  *other* namespaces and is only legible with two logs side by side — the 5-minute access-token
+  session with no `--cookie-refresh`, and why an XHR answered with a 302 instead of a 401 loses a
+  POST body silently.
 - **`crafty-admin-credential`** — you signed into Keycloak and Crafty *still* asks for a password.
   Expected: Crafty 4 has no OIDC, so its own local login sits behind the oauth2-proxy gate as a second
   factor. The page tells the two layers apart from the sidecar log, and explains that the bootstrap

runbooks/kustomization.yaml

@@ -85,6 +85,11 @@ configMapGenerator:
       - node-io=node-io.md
       - node-memory=node-memory.md
       - node-memory-swap=node-memory-swap.md
+      # Operator procedure, not alert-linked. Reading the per-app oauth2-proxy sidecar log to tell
+      # Keycloak, the sidecar and the app's own login apart. Cookie collision between two sidecars
+      # presents as random session loss in ONE app's log and is only legible with both side by side,
+      # so the page has to be reachable at 3am without going looking for it in git.
+      - oauth2-proxy-session=oauth2-proxy-session.md
       # Operator procedure, not an alert page (no alert links to it — the
       # alert-runbooks-resolvable check treats that as advisory). It is served
       # because the plex.tv claim window is short and is not a thing to go looking

runbooks/oauth2-proxy-session.md

@@ -0,0 +1,195 @@
+# oauth2-proxy-session — telling the auth layers apart from the sidecar log
+
+**Not alert-driven.** This is an operator procedure for the per-app oauth2-proxy sidecars
+(`jackett`, `pihole`, `qbittorrent`, `radarr`, `sonarr`, `crafty`) and the shared forward-auth
+proxy in namespace `oauth2-proxy`. Use it when a gated UI behaves as though you are signed in and
+signed out at the same time: the page loads, but its buttons and saves quietly do nothing.
+
+> The sidecar log contains **email addresses, session UUIDs and full callback URLs including an
+> OAuth `code`**. Read it, do not paste it. (Repo rule §6: secrets never enter a transcript.)
+
+## What this means here
+
+Every gated app on `home.keithjackson.dev` has **at least two** independent authentications
+stacked on it, and the symptom rarely names the one that refused:
+
+1. **Keycloak** — the `homelab` realm issues the token. Failures here are visible: you see a login
+   form, or an error page from Keycloak's own hostname.
+2. **The oauth2-proxy sidecar** — validates the session cookie and the group claim
+   (`media-users` / `platform-admins`). **This is the layer that fails silently**, and the rest of
+   this page is about reading it.
+3. **The app's own login**, where it has one — Crafty and Radarr/Sonarr each present a local login
+   *behind* the Keycloak gate. See `runbooks/crafty-admin-credential.md` for that layer.
+
+The sidecar's access log distinguishes all three, if you know the four lines to look for. Get it:
+
+    infra/devcontainer/dev.sh run bash -c 'kubectl --context k3s-prod -n jackett logs \
+      -l app.kubernetes.io/name=jackett -c oauth2-proxy --tail=-1'
+
+Substitute the namespace and label for the app you are chasing. Always pass `--context k3s-prod`:
+`dev.sh` merges both clusters and picks a current-context **per invocation**, and that default has
+already changed once. Do not run two `dev.sh` invocations at the same time.
+
+### The four lines, and what each one means
+
+| Log line | What actually happened | Which layer |
+|---|---|---|
+| `[AuthSuccess] Authenticated via OAuth2: Session{... groups:[...]}` | Keycloak issued a token and the proxy accepted it. **The IdP is fine.** | Keycloak ✔ |
+| `[oauthproxy.go:1026] No valid authentication in request. Initiating login.` | **No session cookie was presented at all.** Either you never had one, or something *deleted* it — see below. | sidecar |
+| `[stored_session.go:94] Error loading cookied session: cookie signature not valid, removing session` | A cookie **of the right name** arrived that this proxy **could not decrypt**. Almost always a *different* proxy's cookie. Note `removing session`: this proxy then **deletes** it. | sidecar, cookie collision |
+| an upstream path of `-` instead of `/` in an access-log line | the **proxy answered the request itself**; it never reached the app. Compare `POST - "/api/..."` against `POST / "/api/..."`. | sidecar |
+
+That last column is the one people miss. The upstream field sits between the method and the quoted
+path. `-` means the proxy handled it (a redirect, a 401, its own `/oauth2/*` endpoints); `/` means
+it was proxied to the app. Count them:
+
+    infra/devcontainer/dev.sh run bash -c 'kubectl --context k3s-prod -n jackett logs \
+      -l app.kubernetes.io/name=jackett -c oauth2-proxy --tail=-1 \
+      | grep -v "\"/ping\"" | grep -E " (POST|PUT|DELETE) " | cut -c1-140'
+
+If your writes show `-`, the app never saw them. On 2026-09-30, **4 of the 6 POSTs** in jackett's
+log had `-`.
+
+## First commands
+
+**1. Did Keycloak ever succeed?** No `AuthSuccess` at all means this is not a cookie problem —
+go to `runbooks/keycloak-down.md` or `runbooks/keycloak-client-secrets.md`.
+
+    infra/devcontainer/dev.sh run bash -c 'kubectl --context k3s-prod -n <ns> logs \
+      -l app.kubernetes.io/name=<app> -c oauth2-proxy --tail=-1 | grep -c AuthSuccess'
+
+**2. How long does a session last?** Subtract `created` from `expires` on an `AuthSuccess` line.
+If it is exactly **5m**, the session's lifetime is Keycloak's access-token lifetime and the proxy
+is not refreshing it:
+
+    infra/devcontainer/dev.sh run bash -c 'kubectl --context k3s-prod -n <ns> logs \
+      -l app.kubernetes.io/name=<app> -c oauth2-proxy --tail=-1 \
+      | grep AuthSuccess | tail -1 | grep -o "created:[^ ]* [^ ]*\|expires:[^ ]* [^ ]*"'
+
+The same line says `refresh_token:true` — the proxy is *holding* a refresh token. It will only
+spend it if `--cookie-refresh` is set; the default is `0`, meaning disabled.
+
+**3. Is this a cookie collision?** Two checks, and you want both.
+
+*Names and scopes* — every instance that emits the default name `_oauth2_proxy` on the shared
+`.home.keithjackson.dev` domain is in the collision set with every other one:
+
+    infra/devcontainer/dev.sh run bash -c 'kubectl --context k3s-prod get pods -A -o json \
+      | grep -E "cookie-name|cookie-domain"'
+
+An instance with **no** `--cookie-name` argument is using the default. That is the failure — the
+flag being absent, not wrong.
+
+*The smoking gun* — search **every** proxy, not just the one you are debugging, for the removal
+line, and put the timestamps next to each other:
+
+    infra/devcontainer/dev.sh run bash -c 'for ns in jackett pihole qbittorrent radarr sonarr crafty; do \
+      echo "== $ns"; kubectl --context k3s-prod -n $ns logs -l app.kubernetes.io/name=$ns \
+      -c oauth2-proxy --tail=-1 2>/dev/null | grep stored_session; done'
+
+**4. Do the cookie-secrets actually differ?** They should — but confirm the collision is between
+instances that genuinely cannot read each other. Compare **hashes**, never values:
+
+    infra/devcontainer/dev.sh run bash -c 'for ns in jackett pihole qbittorrent radarr sonarr crafty; do \
+      printf "%s " "$ns"; kubectl --context k3s-prod -n $ns get secret $ns-oauth2-proxy \
+      -o jsonpath="{.data.cookie-secret}" | sha256sum | cut -c1-12; done'
+
+Never print `.data` or `.stringData` itself. A password has been leaked into a transcript here
+before.
+
+### Do not rank apps by their failure ratio
+
+Counting `No valid authentication` against `AuthSuccess` per app looks like a health metric and is
+not one. **It ranks chattiness, not breakage.** An app whose UI polls or holds a WebSocket
+manufactures one failure line per retry, so a single dead cookie in one idle browser tab becomes
+scores of log lines, while an app nobody is using scores zero no matter how broken it is. Measured
+2026-09-30: Radarr showed **156** unauthenticated requests against **1** `AuthSuccess`, but the top
+paths were `/api/v3/command` (62), `/api/v3/queue/details` (46) and `/signalr/messages/negotiate`
+(43) — polling, not 156 user-visible failures.
+
+**Bound the window to the current pod, not to wall-clock.** A ratio measured over 24 h across a pod
+that restarted 13 h ago is mostly about the *previous* configuration, and that is exactly how a
+deployed fix gets written off as ineffective. The pod's own log has an exact boundary — its process
+start — so read it there:
+
+    infra/devcontainer/dev.sh run bash -c 'kubectl --context k3s-prod -n <ns> get pod \
+      -l app.kubernetes.io/name=<app> -o jsonpath="{.items[*].status.startTime}{\"\n\"}"'
+
+then count within that same pod's log. On 2026-09-30 this took Crafty from an apparent 81:1 over 24 h
+to **3 failures in its fixed pod's entire 13 h 52 m life**, two of them `/ws` reconnects.
+
+## Likely causes, most likely first
+
+1. **Cookie collision between two per-app proxies.** Several instances emit the default
+   `_oauth2_proxy` on `.home.keithjackson.dev` with different `cookie-secret`s. Whoever
+   authenticates last overwrites the rest; the losers log `cookie signature not valid, removing
+   session` and — because `removing session` clears the cookie on *their* `--cookie-domain`, which
+   is the whole zone — **delete a session belonging to an app in another namespace**. The victim
+   then logs `No valid authentication` with no cookie at all, seconds after a clean login, while
+   its own `expires` is still minutes away. **Read both logs side by side; one app's log alone
+   makes this look like random session loss.** Fix: a unique `--cookie-name` and a host-scoped
+   `--cookie-domain` on the per-app sidecar. The shared forward-auth proxy keeps the zone-wide
+   scope — cross-host auth is its job.
+2. **Session pinned to a 5-minute access token with no refresh.** `--cookie-refresh` unset means
+   the proxy never spends the refresh token it holds, so the session expires with the access token.
+   Set it to about half the measured token lifetime.
+3. **An XHR got a 302 instead of a 401.** The app's JavaScript follows the redirect invisibly, the
+   live Keycloak SSO session satisfies it without a prompt, and the XHR resolves with **HTML where
+   it expected JSON**. Nothing is logged as an error and the operator is never re-prompted — this
+   is what "it just doesn't save, and reloading doesn't help" looks like. Worse on a write: a
+   browser following a 302 re-issues a POST as a GET and **drops the body**, so the change is
+   discarded silently. oauth2-proxy's built-in AJAX guard only fires on an exact
+   `Accept: application/json`, which most app JavaScript does not send; make it deterministic with
+   `--api-route=<regex>` (**singular** — `--api-routes` does not exist and the proxy refuses to
+   start). Keep browser-navigable paths *out* of the regex so a plain page load still signs you in.
+4. **Group membership.** An `AuthSuccess` followed by `403` is the `--allowed-group` gate, not a
+   session problem. Check the `groups:[...]` field on the `AuthSuccess` line.
+5. **The app's own second login.** Crafty, Radarr and Sonarr each have one. `AuthSuccess` followed
+   by the app's own `/login` page is layer 3, not layer 2.
+
+## When to escalate or stop
+
+- **Stop before you `kubectl edit`/`patch`/`apply` anything.** Flux reconciles `main`; a
+  hand-applied flag is drift that the next reconcile reverts or, worse, adopts. Argument changes
+  go through a branch and a PR. Reading logs is always safe; changing the Deployment is not an
+  agent action.
+- **Do not hand-edit `apps/**/<app>.yaml` — those files are GENERATED.** The five per-app sidecars
+  (jackett, pihole, qbittorrent, radarr, sonarr) get their argument list from one shared function,
+  `_oauth2_sidecar_container()` in `catalog/render.py`; `catalog/<app>.yaml` declares only
+  `auth.mode` and `auth.groups`, and the `auth` schema is `additionalProperties: false`, so there
+  is **no per-app override hook**. A hand-edit to the rendered file is caught by the merge gate's
+  `render-golden` stage ("GOLDEN DRIFT ... does not match the canonical render") and would be
+  erased by the next render anyway. Change the renderer, then regenerate:
+
+      python3 catalog/render.py --all catalog -o apps --wave-layout --no-image-automation
+
+  **Budget for the blast radius**: because the function is shared, any change to it rewrites the
+  sidecar block in **all five** rendered apps, and the gate requires all five be regenerated in
+  the same commit. There is no way to change one app's sidecar arguments alone. Measured
+  2026-09-30. Coordinate before starting — this is a single change, not five.
+- **Crafty is the exception** and is not rendered from the catalog: its sidecar is hand-written in
+  `platform/crafty/deployment.yaml`, so it can be, and was, fixed independently.
+- **You cannot currently alert on any of this**, and that is worth knowing before you promise
+  monitoring. Measured 2026-09-30: no per-app sidecar sets `--metrics-address` and none declares a
+  `metrics` container port, so oauth2-proxy's metrics listener never starts — the only oauth2-proxy
+  series in Prometheus come from the shared proxy in namespace `oauth2-proxy`, which does set both.
+  Until the renderer emits them for the per-app sidecars, every diagnosis on this page is
+  log-reading only.
+- **Validate an argument change before you open the PR**, not after. The pinned image will tell
+  you what it understood, without touching the cluster:
+
+      podman run --rm quay.io/oauth2-proxy/oauth2-proxy:v7.8.1 --help
+
+  Running it with your full proposed argument list prints a `Cookie settings:` line and an
+  `API route - Path:` line back at you, and rejects mutually exclusive flags outright
+  (`--session-cookie-minimal` with `--cookie-refresh`, for one). A flag typo here is a CrashLoop
+  on a service you have just told someone is fixed.
+- **Do not rotate a `cookie-secret` to "clear" a bad session.** It signs every live session out of
+  that app and does nothing about the collision, which is caused by the *names* matching, not the
+  secrets differing.
+- **Escalate to Keycloak** (`runbooks/keycloak-down.md`, `runbooks/keycloak-client-secrets.md`) if
+  there is no `AuthSuccess` in any proxy's log — that is an IdP or client-secret problem and no
+  cookie flag will help.
+- **Hand off rather than guess** if you see `cookie signature not valid` on a proxy that already
+  has a unique `--cookie-name`. That combination should not occur; it means something is writing
+  that name which is not in this inventory. Record what you measured.