# In-cluster conformance Job (L2/L3) > **STATUS NOTE (2026-09-29) — read before trusting the "Phase 0" framing below.** > This document speaks as though no cluster exists and the platform is scaffolding. **A > three-node k3s cluster has existed for weeks** and Flux has been reconciling against it. > Gitea is live, the Actions runner `incluster-dind` is online, and `main` is a protected > branch. Where the text says "Phase 0", "stub", or "no cluster exists", read it as > describing a **live gap** rather than an expected stage — most importantly, L2/L3 > conformance still does not run in CI (`vars.CLUSTER_AVAILABLE` is unset), which is a real > coverage hole, not a phase. > > This mismatch is not cosmetic. A month of "the gate enforces this" claims rested on > documentation rather than measurement, and `main` was unprotected with zero runners > registered the whole time. **Query the live API before asserting platform state.** Per **ADR-0011** and **docs/14 "Where each layer runs"**: L0/L1 run in CI without a cluster, but **L2 behavioral and L3 fault-injection run as an in-cluster Chainsaw Job** on the dev/test cluster that **CI triggers and waits for**. CI holds **no** cluster credentials — the Job's own scoped ServiceAccount does (R-SEC-02). ## Files - `rbac.yaml` — the `conformance` namespace, the `conformance-runner` ServiceAccount, and a **least-privilege ClusterRole skeleton**. Rules start **empty** and are added — each commented with the test/requirement that needs it — only as the matching fault-injection test lands. This is a **privileged test identity**: never reused by workloads, its own audit item. - `chainsaw-job.yaml` — the **run template** (not reconciled; the trigger renders it per run). Single entrypoint `./run.sh`; a clone init container delivers the suite at the commit under test; artifacts leave over stdout. Its header is the authority on the substitution tokens and the admission constraints it satisfies, and records the `initContainers` hole that was found and closed alongside it — read it before editing either file. - `conformance-clone` — **arrives with PR #18**, not this one. The clone init container's entire logic, baked into the runner image at `/usr/local/bin/conformance-clone`. It is a file in the image rather than an inline script in the Job precisely so admission can pin it: a policy cannot tell the committed script from an attacker's when both are just `args` on `/bin/bash -c`. The repository URL and clone target are hardcoded **there** on purpose, and `CONFORMANCE_REPO_URL`/`CONFORMANCE_SRC` are hard-failed on a mismatch rather than honoured — a URL taken from env would let the trigger choose which repository's code runs as `conformance-runner`. This branch's Job depends on that interface: `CONFORMANCE_GIT_SHA`, `GITEA_USERNAME`/`GITEA_TOKEN`, a clone target of `/workspace/src` (hence `workingDir: /workspace/src/conformance`), and `TMPDIR`/`HOME` under `/workspace`. ## Flow 1. CI (Gitea Actions) renders `chainsaw-job.yaml` — two `@@TOKEN@@` substitutions, the runner image digest and the commit SHA — replaces `args` with the invocation shape, and `create`s the Job under the narrow `conformance-trigger` identity (create/get jobs, get pods + pods/log — *not* a broad kubeconfig, and deliberately **no `pods/exec`**). 2. Admission (`platform/kyverno/admission/conformance-trigger-job-shape.yaml`, Enforce + fail-closed) admits only the committed shape. That policy, not the RBAC, is the boundary. 3. The **init container** runs `/usr/local/bin/conformance-clone` with **no args**: it shallow-clones the repo into `/workspace/src`, fetches the commit if the shallow tip does not already contain it, detaches onto it, and **asserts `HEAD` equals the requested SHA** — the suite runs at the commit under test or not at all. The read-only Gitea credential reaches `git` as env vars from `secretKeyRef` (secret `conformance-git-readonly`, keys `username`/`token`), never as a volume: admission allows no volume but `workspace` and `results`. 4. The runner executes `./run.sh` under `conformance-runner`, writing `report.junit.xml` + `coverage/` to the `results` volume at `/results` (`CONF_ARTIFACTS`). 5. On exit — green, red or aborted — `run.sh` prints a delimited base64 tar of that tree to stdout, carrying `bytes`, `lines` and `sha256` in **both** the BEGIN and END markers. CI decodes it from `kubectl logs` and must make all five completeness checks listed above `conf_emit_artifacts_tgz()` in `../run.sh`; a partial log then fails collection instead of decoding to plausible garbage. ## Prerequisites before this Job can run at all - **Secret `conformance-git-readonly`** in namespace `conformance`, keys `username` and `token`: a **read-only** Gitea token for this repository. Never a write token or a push-capable deploy key. **Does not exist** — operator, out of GitOps (plan §3 item 6). - **The `conformance-runner` image** (plan §5 step 1) — built in **PR #18**, which must merge before this template is usable; its digest is what the trigger substitutes. Contract the image MUST meet, because the Job and the admission policy both depend on it: - bash, git, python3, chainsaw and kubectl on `PATH`; - a **uid 65532** non-root user — the Job's `runAsUser`/`fsGroup` pin it, so a different uid in the Containerfile means the Job will not start; - `conformance-clone` installed at **`/usr/local/bin/conformance-clone`**, mode 0755. The policy rule `trigger-initcontainers-must-be-the-committed-clone-step` pins that exact path, so an image without it cannot run the clone step and no other path will be admitted. ## Phase 0 No cluster exists, so nothing here is applied yet. These manifests are reconciled by Flux from Phase 1+ and first exercised when L2/L3 can run (T-3.0 onward). In Phase 0 the same `run.sh` runs in CI's no-cluster stage and emits a **skipped** JUnit + the coverage report.