Files
jakman85andClaude Opus 5 234cc6a71a
gate / gate (push) Successful in 1m33s
gate / gate (pull_request) Successful in 1m32s
gate / conformance (push) Has been skipped
gate / conformance (pull_request) Has been skipped
docs(gitea): a skipped job reports SUCCESS, not pending -- correct the deadlock claim
The runner came up on 2026-09-29 and the first CI jobs this repo has ever run went
green, which falsified a claim merged in #2.

MEASURED:
  gate / gate (pull_request)          success   1m58s (PR 1), 1m34s (PR 2)
  gate / gate (push)                  success   1m32s (PR 2 only)
  gate / conformance (pull_request)   success   "Has been skipped"

#2 said listing the conformance context as a required check would deadlock every PR,
because the job is `if: false` and never runs. That is wrong. Gitea reports a skipped
job as SUCCESS. Requiring it would not deadlock anything -- it would pass VACUOUSLY,
forever, while nothing ran.

The conclusion is unchanged (never require it) but the reason inverts, and the corrected
reason matters more: under HARD RULE 4 a permanently-green check that verifies nothing is
worse than a deadlock. A deadlock is loud. This is the exact fail-open shape the
2026-09-18 audit and this one both keep finding.

Also records that the (push) contexts only appear for branches matching gate.yml's push
trigger -- feature/**, fix/**, docs/**, chore/** -- and NOT feat/**, which is why PR 1's
feat/ branch produced only pull_request contexts. Require the pull_request context alone,
or PRs from non-matching prefixes never satisfy the rule.

CLAUDE.md's enforcement table is updated: the runner half is genuinely fixed and observed
green, the branch-protection half is not. Adds the warning that a green tick is not by
itself evidence that anything ran.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <[email protected]>
2026-09-29 01:07:13 -05:00
..

infra/ — node provisioning and the toolchain

OpenTofu (Proxmox VE) + cloud-init + Ansible bring up the 3-node k3s/Cilium dev cluster. Spec: ../home-network-k3s/docs/02-environments-and-provisioning.md.

Path What
tofu/ The "Create" stage: 3 cloud-init'd VMs on the Proxmox box (bpg/proxmox provider)
cloud-init/ First-boot baseline shipped as a Proxmox user-data snippet
ansible/ The "Baseline"/"Configure" stages: k3s HA, Cilium, kube-vip, the VPN egress gateway
devcontainer/ The pinned toolchain (tofu, ansible, sops, age, flux, kubectl, helm and the whole CI gate toolchain)
cluster.sh RETIRED — drove the old libvirt VMs; does not work against Proxmox
PHASE1-STATUS.md Current state of the cluster and how to reconnect to it
PHASE1-SCOPE.md Historical Phase-1 scoping doc (libvirt era — superseded)

Where the cluster actually lives

The dev cluster is not on this workstation. It runs on a Proxmox VE host; the nodes sit on the Proxmox LAN and are reached across a pfSense NAT:

Nodes k3s-dev-1/2/3 at 192.168.1.50/.51/.52 — 6 vCPU, 24 GiB, Debian 13, k3s v1.36.4
kube-API kube-vip VIP 192.168.1.49:6443, reached from the workstation via NAT 192.168.2.50:6443
Node SSH pfSense NAT 192.168.2.102:2250/2251/2252 → node :22 (Ansible only)
Ingress VIP 192.168.1.53 (Cilium L2, shared Gateway); .53–.60 reserved for LB VIPs

The earlier libvirt/KVM cluster on 10.73.0.0/24 is retired. Any doc or command referencing virsh, qemu:///system, or 10.73.0.x for the cluster is historical.