R-STATE-02 was the last safety-critical requirement with no verifying test,
exempted via DOCUMENTED_GAPS. Author the L3 fault-injection test that proves the
guarantee and remove the exemption.
tests/l3-fault-injection/node-loss/chainsaw-test.yaml:
GIVEN a 3-replica Longhorn volume with written data attached on node N,
WHEN N is removed from service (cordon + evict the attached workload, forcing
the volume to detach from N),
THEN a fresh workload on a SURVIVING node re-attaches the same volume and reads
the canary intact — volume stays available, cluster reconverges.
Safe-by-construction for the 3-node embedded-etcd dev cluster:
- Disruption scoped to EXACTLY ONE node, at the scheduling layer only (cordon +
evict our own pod). kubelet/etcd stay up — etcd quorum is never touched.
- Never `kubectl drain`; only our own writer pod is deleted, so no unrelated or
system pod is disturbed.
- Victim node labelled conformance.home.k3s/cordoned-by=<test-ns>; `finally`
ALWAYS uncordons every node with THAT label and removes it — restored even on
failure/timeout, and never touches an operator-cordoned node.
- Self-skips green until a longhorn StorageClass AND >= 3 Ready nodes exist.
Bookkeeping:
- run.sh: remove R-STATE-02 from DOCUMENTED_GAPS; add node-loss to CONF_HEAVY_TESTS
(serial pass, matches the other Longhorn/KubeVirt L3 tests).
- incluster/rbac.yaml: enable the scoped nodes get/list/patch rule the test needs
(cordon/uncordon/label); no eviction rights (no drain).
- README.md / coverage.py docstring: refresh the documented-gap example.
Coverage: 36/51 -> 37/51 (70.6% -> 72.5%); safety-critical gaps 1 -> 0. Only
R-STATE-02 changed ([] -> node-loss); no other requirement or golden touched.
NOTE: LIVE execution is DEFERRED to an operator-chosen maintenance window. This
change AUTHORS + statically validates the test (renders, chainsaw-lints, harness
selects it, coverage updates). The static gate runs L2/L3 as SKIP without a
cluster (expected). The node-disruption test was NOT run live.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <[email protected]>
Conformance tests — layout & requirement-tagging convention
Every test is a Chainsaw Test in its own directory:
tests/
l1-rendering/ L1 — ServiceDefinition -> rendered resources match golden
l2-behavioral/ L2 — real runtime behavior (probes against a cluster)
l3-fault-injection/ L3 — break something; assert fail-closed / no-data-loss
meta/ harness self-checks (R-TEST-*), cluster-independent
<test-name>/chainsaw-test.yaml
The layer a test belongs to is its subtree and its .../layer annotation; the
coverage generator cross-checks the two.
Requirement-tagging convention (authoritative)
A test declares the requirement(s) it verifies three ways; the label is the source of truth, the annotations must agree with it (the coverage generator fails on drift):
metadata:
name: default-deny
labels:
# ONE label per verified R-* ID. Machine-selectable + coverage source of truth.
conformance.home.k3s/R-NET-01: "true"
annotations:
# Human-readable canonical list — MUST equal the label set.
conformance.home.k3s/requirements: "R-NET-01"
# Declared layer (L1|L2|L3|META) — must match the subtree.
conformance.home.k3s/layer: "L2"
# true => R-TEST-05 requires this to be (or have) an L3 fault-injection test.
conformance.home.k3s/safety-critical: "false"
# Given/When/Then intent, for the coverage report and reviewers.
conformance.home.k3s/intent: "Given ... When ... Then ..."
Why a label per requirement (not a comma list): Kubernetes label values can't hold
a comma-separated list, and chainsaw test --selector selects on label keys/values.
One conformance.home.k3s/<R-ID>=true label per requirement makes both subset-selection
and coverage extraction exact and robust.
How this drives the tooling
- Subset runs (merge gate):
run.sh --requirements R-NET-01,R-NET-06resolves the R-IDs to the set of test dirs carrying those labels (union, deduped) and runs each once. - Coverage (
lib/coverage.py): reads these labels from everychainsaw-test.yaml, maps each registry requirement -> its verifying test(s), and flags gaps + any label/annotation mismatch + tags not in the registry. - JUnit: results (real or skipped-scaffold) carry the R-IDs in
classname+ properties, so the JUnit itself stays traceable (R-TEST-04).
Authoring rules (R-TEST-01/02/06)
- Behavior, not existence. Assert what the system does (a probe cannot connect), never that an object merely exists (a policy can exist and not enforce).
- Given/When/Then structure with
given-*/when-*/then-*step names. - Hermetic & self-cleaning. Rely on Chainsaw's per-test namespace + auto-teardown;
put any out-of-namespace fixture cleanup in a
finallyblock. A leaked fixture is a failure. - Bounded, deterministic waits. Use assert/error polling within the config timeouts;
never
sleep-and-hope. - Safety-critical => fault-injection. For a safety-critical requirement, actually
break the thing and assert fail-closed / no-data-loss, with
finallyrestoring state. - Never weaken a test to go green (R-TEST-06). If the spec can't be met, escalate to the PM — do not relax the assertion or the requirement.
Scaffolds in this tree carry TODO(T-x.y) markers where a fixture/assertion lands as a
later roadmap phase delivers the capability under test.