jakman85andClaude Opus 5
fa4deac877
One historical `-dirty` row reddened this gate permanently, even after a clean re-run of the same test. status.py already resolves duplicates latest-wins (latest_by_test), so a superseded row is not evidence of anything — but this check iterated every row, so the poisoned row from the git_sha bug (fixed in the parent commit) would have failed the audit forever. The dirty-tree assertion is now scoped to rows status.py would actually honour, by importing latest_by_test rather than reimplementing the rule, so the two cannot disagree about which rows are live claims. Structural assertions — provenance keys, sentinel, test-still-exists — still apply to EVERY row. Nothing is erased: the row stays in the ledger and runs/20260913T014437Z-19fc8bc/ run.log stays committed. It simply stops being read as a live claim. Verified the guard is intact afterwards — the check still REFUSES both forgeries it is built to catch (a self-skip presented as a pass, and a proven row from the root commit). A dirty-then-clean sequence is also the normal shape of noticing a dirty tree, fixing it, and re-running; that should not permanently fail an audit. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <[email protected]>