main became a protected branch on 2026-09-29, so the direct push that 37 of 39 runbooks instructed is REJECTED. The wording was merely stale before; it is now actively wrong, and it is the line an operator reads mid-incident. Every occurrence now describes the real path: push a branch, open a PR, merge once the gate is green -- that merge is the deploy. 35 files shared one identical block; flux-reconcile.md, README.md and plex-claim.md each said it their own way and were corrected individually. plex-claim.md is rewritten around the delivery loop and records that THE SERVER IS NOW CLAIMED (PlexOnlineToken present in /config), so PLEX_CLAIM is a permanent no-op and the page only applies after a /config wipe. Adds infra/plex/claim-ship.sh, which drives branch -> commit -> push -> PR -> gate -> merge -> reconcile -> pod roll -> verdict with a stopwatch. Three steps are easy to lose under time pressure and two are SILENT when skipped: --with-source (without it the Kustomization applies the previously-fetched revision), the mandatory rollout restart (only the ciphertext changes, so the pod template is byte-identical and nothing restarts itself), and the feat/ branch prefix (act_runner capacity is 1, and a prefix inside gate.yml's push trigger fires a redundant run that serialises ahead of the PR run). Drops the "~4-minute TTL" the page asserted in four places. It was uncited, and upstream pms-docker documents no expiry at all. The countdown on plex.tv/claim is the authority. Measured loop: ~2m45s. DECISIONS-LOG carries the PM handoff: both halves of the 2026-08-31 CI claim were false, the stale-.runner root cause, the four-deep Flux dependency cascade, and the correction that a skipped Gitea job reports success rather than hanging. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <[email protected]>
7.7 KiB
monitoring-capacity — The monitoring stack's own PVC is filling up
Alert: MonitoringVolumeFillingUp (warning, 15m)
File: platform/monitoring/alerts.yaml, group platform-health.monitoring-self
Expression: kubelet_volume_stats_available_bytes{namespace="monitoring"} / kubelet_volume_stats_capacity_bytes{namespace="monitoring"} < 0.15
What this means here
"Don't let the monitor blind itself." Prometheus or Loki is running out of disk. If it fills, you lose
the ability to see every other alert in this set — which is why monitoring gets its own rule instead
of sharing /runbooks/pvc-capacity (the two files partition the namespace space between them; the
thresholds are deliberately identical, 15% free for 15m).
Live shape on prod:
prometheus-...-prometheus-0PVC 50Gi,retention: 30d,retentionSize: 45GiBstorage-loki-0PVC 50Gi- both on the
longhornclass, 3 replicas
retentionSize: 45GiB against a 50Gi PVC is intentional: Prometheus is supposed to plateau near the
high-water mark and then stay there. So a Prometheus TSDB approaching 45 GiB is normal, not a leak.
That is also why the predictive rule in pvc-capacity-alerts.yaml deliberately excludes the
monitoring namespace: a TSDB filling toward its retention limit looks exactly like an unbounded leak
to predict_linear until it plateaus.
So the real question is which PVC and whether it should be plateauing: read the
persistentvolumeclaim label first. Loki has no size cap analogous to retentionSize, so a log
volume growing past 85% is the more likely genuine problem of the two.
Running the commands in this runbook
kubectl does not work on the operator workstation. The toolchain lives only in the pinned dev
container, and the host's k3s-oidc context hangs on a browser prompt once its token expires —
that hang is not the cluster being down. Every command below runs as:
infra/devcontainer/dev.sh run bash -c 'kubectl --context k3s-prod get nodes'
Always pass --context k3s-prod explicitly. dev.sh merges BOTH clusters into one kubeconfig and
picks a current-context per invocation, and that default has already changed once — it was k3s-dev
until dev was decommissioned on 2026-09-13, and is k3s-prod now. A command that names its context means
the same thing next month as it does today; one that relies on the default does not, and the failure is
silent (it answers confidently about the other cluster). CLUSTER=prod infra/devcontainer/dev.sh run kubectl ... selects it explicitly, and every invocation prints a banner naming the cluster it is about
to talk to — read it. Do not run two dev.sh invocations at once; they share one container and
interfere.
USE FULLY-QUALIFIED RESOURCE NAMES, ALWAYS. Three CRDs on this cluster register the kind Backup:
longhorn.io/v1beta2, postgresql.cnpg.io/v1 and velero.io/v1. The bare short name resolves to
Longhorn's, which holds zero objects — so kubectl get backup -A prints "No resources found" on
a cluster holding 6 Velero backups and 27 CNPG backups. Verified on prod 2026-09-13. Reading that as
"the backups are gone" and acting on it turns a false negative into real data loss. Write
backups.velero.io, backups.postgresql.cnpg.io, clusters.postgresql.cnpg.io,
settings.longhorn.io, volumes.longhorn.io, nodes.longhorn.io.
Mutating kubectl (apply, patch, annotate, rollout) and flux reconcile are blocked for
agents here: every durable change goes through git. main is a protected branch — a direct push
is rejected. A change lands by pushing a branch, opening a PR, and merging it once the gate is
green; that merge is the deploy. Where this runbook gives a mutating command it is for an operator,
and it says so.
First commands
infra/devcontainer/dev.sh run bash -c \
'kubectl --context k3s-prod -n monitoring get pvc; echo; \
kubectl --context k3s-prod -n monitoring get prometheus -o jsonpath="{.items[0].spec.retention} {.items[0].spec.retentionSize}{\"\n\"}"'
Actual on-disk usage from inside the pods:
infra/devcontainer/dev.sh run bash -c \
'kubectl --context k3s-prod -n monitoring exec prometheus-kube-prometheus-stack-prometheus-0 -c prometheus -- df -h /prometheus; \
kubectl --context k3s-prod -n monitoring exec loki-0 -- df -h /var/loki'
Is Prometheus at its retentionSize (normal) or past it (a problem)?
infra/devcontainer/dev.sh run bash -c \
'kubectl --context k3s-prod -n monitoring port-forward svc/kube-prometheus-stack-prometheus 19090:9090 & sleep 5; \
for q in "prometheus_tsdb_storage_blocks_bytes" "prometheus_tsdb_head_series" "rate(prometheus_tsdb_compactions_failed_total[1h])"; do \
printf "%s " "$q"; curl -s -G --data-urlencode "query=$q" localhost:19090/api/v1/query | python3 -c "import json,sys;print([x[\"value\"][1] for x in json.load(sys.stdin)[\"data\"][\"result\"]])"; done'
Series growth is the usual driver — find the biggest contributors:
infra/devcontainer/dev.sh run bash -c \
'kubectl --context k3s-prod -n monitoring port-forward svc/kube-prometheus-stack-prometheus 19090:9090 & sleep 5; \
curl -s "localhost:19090/api/v1/status/tsdb" | python3 -m json.tool | head -40'
Likely causes, most likely first
1. Prometheus has reached its retention high-water mark (expected)
retentionSize: 45GiB on a 50Gi PVC leaves 10% headroom, which is close to the 15% trigger. If
prometheus_tsdb_storage_blocks_bytes is near 45 GiB and steady, this is the design working and
the correct response is either to accept it or to raise both the PVC and retentionSize together in
platform/monitoring/kube-prometheus-stack.yaml. Raising retention without raising the PVC is how you
get a genuinely full disk.
2. Loki log volume growth
Loki has no retentionSize equivalent configured. A noisy workload (a crashlooping pod, a chatty reconciler) can grow it quickly. Remediation: find the noisy stream in Grafana → Explore, fix the source, and set/lower Loki retention in git.
3. Series cardinality grew after a chart or workload change
serviceMonitorSelectorNilUsesHelmValues and podMonitorSelectorNilUsesHelmValues are both false
here, which means Prometheus selects every ServiceMonitor/PodMonitor in the cluster regardless of
labels. That is convenient (no additionalLabels needed anywhere) and it also means a new
component's monitor is picked up automatically, cardinality and all. Check
/api/v1/status/tsdb for the top label pairs.
4. Compaction is failing
rate(prometheus_tsdb_compactions_failed_total[1h]) > 0 means blocks are not being merged or expired.
Usually an I/O problem underneath — cross-read /runbooks/node-io.
5. The volume is on a node that is itself short of space
/runbooks/longhorn-capacity and /runbooks/node-disk.
When to escalate or stop
- Do not delete Prometheus TSDB blocks or Loki chunks by hand. Lower retention and let the component expire them; hand-deleting blocks can leave the TSDB unopenable.
- Do not raise
retentionorretentionSizewithout raising the PVC in the same change. - If Prometheus is already full and crashlooping, you are blind: check the alerts you care about
directly against the CRs (
clusters.postgresql.cnpg.io,volumes.longhorn.io,kubectl get nodes) rather than waiting for alerts that cannot be evaluated. - Escalate for PVC expansion — it needs node headroom, and this cluster has been memory- and disk-constrained before (Prometheus was already raised 2 → 3Gi of RAM after the kps 65→88 upgrade).
Source of truth: runbooks/monitoring-capacity.md. Index: /runbooks/
Records: platform/monitoring/pvc-capacity-alerts.yaml (why monitoring is excluded from the
predictive rule); DECISIONS-LOG.md (Grafana OOM / Prometheus 2→3Gi during kps 65→88).