Files
home-network-k3s-impl/decisions
jakman85andClaude Opus 5 523a463fd7
gate / gate (pull_request) Successful in 1m52s
gate / conformance (pull_request) Has been skipped
fix(node): pin gitea to the Gateway VIP — containerd was resolving it to the non-hairpinned WAN
The pm-agent image pull failed TLS verification, and the previous entry on this branch
recorded it honestly as not diagnosed. Diagnosed now, and it is not about the image.

containerd pulls as a NODE process, so it resolves through node_baseline_dns_servers (the
LAN gateway, deliberately not PiHole) and gets the public answer: a CNAME to
wan.home.keithjackson.dev -> 136.51.115.252, measured via both 1.1.1.1 and 8.8.8.8. This
router does not hairpin, so WAN:443 answers with its own placeholder certificate —
measured with the right SNI from the workstation:

    subject=C=ZZ, ST=Somewhere, L=Unknown, O=%D342e7e6b, CN=%D
    No extensions in certificate

No extensions means no subjectAltName, which is exactly 'certificate is not valid for any
names'. Meanwhile 192.168.2.20 IS the shared Gateway's VIP and its https listener serves
the real Let's Encrypt *.home.keithjackson.dev. The Gateway, the wildcard cert and the
digest were never implicated — only the node's answer.

This file already documents the identical failure for the Keycloak issuer, measured from
k3s-prod-2/-3 on 2026-10-03 (curl exit 60, ssl_verify_result=18), and already carries the
mechanism that fixes it. gitea is simply the second node process to need it; containerd is
a node process and nobody had added it. An operator must run the node_baseline play.

Also records, where an operator reads them, that the agent authenticates to Gitea with a
local account and a scoped PAT by decision — and why the federated alternative is not
merely unchosen but unavailable: Gitea implements only the Authorization Code Grant and
validates no third-party OIDC token, so a Keycloak service-account token cannot
authenticate to its API or to git-over-HTTP.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <[email protected]>
2026-10-06 00:35:18 -05:00
..

decisions/ — the handoff log, one file per entry

This directory is the decision log. ../DECISIONS-LOG.md is the frozen archive of everything written before 2026-09-29 and is never edited again (see "The archive is frozen" below).

Why this exists

DECISIONS-LOG.md was append-only in a single file, and every agent appended to its tail. Two branches that both append hit the same last hunk, so git cannot auto-merge them: the second one to be reviewed conflicts, and so does the third, and the fourth. Measured on 2026-09-29: four of the five open PRs were unmergeable, and DECISIONS-LOG.md was the only conflicting file in all four:

#22 fix/crafty-oauth2-proxy-signin      CONFLICT (content): DECISIONS-LOG.md
#20 feat/conformance-job-template       CONFLICT (content): DECISIONS-LOG.md
#19 feat/conformance-trigger-kubeconfig CONFLICT (content): DECISIONS-LOG.md
#18 feat/conformance-runner-image       CONFLICT (content): DECISIONS-LOG.md
#17 feat/ci-is-the-approver             clean  (it touched no log entry)

Nothing was wrong with any of those changes. The log's storage format serialised work that was otherwise parallel, and it got worse with every concurrent branch: N branches produce N-1 rebases, each of which invalidates any gate run that preceded it.

The fix is the obvious one for concurrent appenders: stop sharing a file. Each handoff is its own file. Two agents writing handoffs touch disjoint paths, so there is nothing for git to merge and nothing to conflict. This scales to any number of parallel branches with zero coordination — which is the point, since the agents are deliberately isolated from each other in separate worktrees (required by CLAUDE.md §0) and cannot coordinate.

There is deliberately no index file and no counter. An index would be a shared mutable file — exactly the thing that just failed — and a sequence number would have two agents racing for 0043. The directory listing is the index.

Writing an entry

One file per handoff, named:

decisions/YYYY-MM-DD-<slug>.md

<slug> is lowercase [a-z0-9-]. Use your branch name's last segment — it is already unique per unit of work, which is precisely the property the filename needs. A branch fix/crafty-oauth2-proxy-signin handed off on 2026-09-29 writes:

decisions/2026-09-29-crafty-oauth2-proxy-signin.md

The file is YAML frontmatter followed by three required sections:

---
date: 2026-09-29
branch: fix/crafty-oauth2-proxy-signin
title: The Keycloak gate works — Crafty's own login was the wall
---

## What changed

Prose. What you actually did, and why.

## What I verified

The measurements, with their numbers. Quote the field you read, not the prose you
believed. Name the gate result and its exit code.

## What I did NOT verify

Everything else. An honest "UNVERIFIED" is worth more than an optimistic "green" —
this repo has been burned by the difference more than once.

All three headings are required and enforced (ci/decisions-log.sh). They are CLAUDE.md §7's contract; making them a checked structure is what stops an entry degrading into "done ✅".

Reading the log

The whole log, oldest first:

ls decisions/[0-9]*.md | sort

The current PM handoff — the newest entry. Ties within a day are broken by what landed on main last, which is the honest answer, so ask git rather than the filename:

git log --diff-filter=A --format='%H' --name-only -- 'decisions/[0-9]*.md' \
  | grep '^decisions/' | head -1

For a quick skim of who said what:

grep -H '^title:' decisions/[0-9]*.md | sort

The archive is frozen

DECISIONS-LOG.md is read-only history. Its SHA-256 is pinned in decisions/ARCHIVE.sha256 and ci/decisions-log.sh fails the merge gate if the file changes. That is not ceremony: without it, the next agent to read runbooks/ or an old CLAUDE.md habit appends to the tail again and re-creates the conflict for everybody else, silently, one PR at a time.

If the archive genuinely must change (a leaked credential to redact, say), that is a deliberate, reviewed act: change it, run sha256sum DECISIONS-LOG.md > decisions/ARCHIVE.sha256, and say in your handoff entry why. Re-pinning is visible in the diff. Appending is not.