Six L2 behavioural tests embedded `home.keithjackson.dev`. They are test INPUTS,
not reconciled manifests, so postBuild substitution never touched them — correct
while dev held the apex, wrong the moment prod came up on
prod.home.keithjackson.dev, and blocking §9's "suite passes green against prod".
Each test now asks the cluster what it is, via a test-level chainsaw binding over
flux-system/cluster-vars — the SAME ConfigMap Flux renders the platform from, so
a test cannot disagree with the cluster it runs on:
bindings:
- name: baseDomain
value: (x_k8s_get($client,'v1','ConfigMap','flux-system','cluster-vars').data.BASE_DOMAIN)
Chosen over a flag or env var because there is nothing to forget at run time, and
test-level scope covers every step (step outputs/bindings are step-scoped).
THE APEX WAS NOT THE ONLY LEAK. dns-exposure and dns-internal-resolution also
hardcoded DEV'S Cilium LB range 192.168.1.53-.60; prod's is 192.168.2.20-.30, so
both were wrong for prod regardless of hostname. Replaced with assertions on the
OBSERVED value — the DNS answer must equal that cluster's GATEWAY_VIP, and the
public record must equal the LB IP the Service was actually assigned — which is
strictly STRONGER than the old range check as well as environment-independent.
sso-forward-auth held the literal only in prose (it talks over Service DNS).
PROVEN, NOT ASSERTED — and the positive control is the important half:
* expressions extracted verbatim from the tracked files resolve to the correct,
DIFFERENT values per cluster (dev home.keithjackson.dev / 192.168.1.53,
prod prod.home.keithjackson.dev / 192.168.2.20);
* the same assert with the HARDCODED apex passes on dev and FAILS on prod
("Invalid value: *.prod.home... Expected: *.home..."), so the harness is
provably not blind — that is exactly the drift removed;
* chainsaw lint VALID on all six; run.sh --lint clean over the whole tree.
END-TO-END L2 RUN AGAINST LIVE DEV: `dns-exposure` PASSED (42.6s) — the binding
produced conformance-dns.home.keithjackson.dev, external-dns published it, and the
probe Job asserted the record against the assigned LB IP. This is the first time
one of these tests has been executed since parameterization, and it exercises the
full path rather than just the binding.
FINDING FROM THAT RUN, worth recording: the test's teardown is ASYNCHRONOUS. It
reports PASS as soon as chainsaw deletes the namespace, but the Cloudflare record
is reaped later by external-dns's own --interval=1m sync. A zone query immediately
after PASS still showed conformance-dns.home.keithjackson.dev plus its owner=default
TXT registry entry. Harmless here, but it means a green dns-exposure does NOT prove
cleanup happened, and if external-dns were suspended the record would persist
silently. Verified separately that it clears.
conformance/incluster/rbac.yaml: its cluster-wide `get configmaps` is now
LOAD-BEARING for these bindings — narrowing it to the test namespace breaks five
tests. Commented so it is not "tidied" later.
l3-fault-injection/dr-restore: its KNOWN-GAPS block said off-host is unproven
because the MinIO shares a Proxmox host with dev's VMs. Still true as run, so the
text now says both — that the R2 move (32d6766) is what closes it, that this test's
pass is against MinIO, and that the ledger row proving R-STATE-03 PREDATES the move,
so off-host DR cannot be claimed until the drill is re-run against R2.
NOT VERIFIED, plainly: no full L2 suite run against prod, so "green against prod"
remains unproven — what is proven is that the tests now derive the CORRECT
expectation for whichever cluster they are pointed at. Whether prod SATISFIES them
(split-horizon, LE wildcard, Grafana's issuer) is untested.
VERIFIED: full CI gate PASS. flux-postbuild-substitution 260 assertions,
render-golden 10/10.
Refs R-TEST-01, R-TEST-02, R-TEST-03, R-TEST-04, R-ENV-02, R-DNS-01/02/03.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <[email protected]>
conformance/ — the home-k3s conformance harness (WS-TEST)
This subtree is the definition of "done" for the whole platform. Nothing is accepted
on a demo, a screenshot, or "it reconciled": every requirement is proven by an
automated, reproducible, behavior-based test tagged with the requirement ID(s) it
verifies (spec docs/14,
ADR-0010,
ADR-0011).
Tooling is fixed by ADR-0011: Kyverno for L0 (the CI policy gate + in-cluster admission enforcer — owned by task T-0.5) and Chainsaw for L1 rendering / L2 behavioral / L3 fault-injection (this harness).
The single command
./run.sh # full suite (skips L1/L2/L3 if no cluster)
./run.sh --requirements R-NET-01,R-NET-06 # merge-gate subset (tagged)
./run.sh --layer l2 # one layer: l1 | l2 | l3 | meta | all
./run.sh --coverage-only # regenerate the coverage report (no cluster)
./run.sh --status # derived requirement-STATUS report (no cluster)
./run.sh --lint # structural-validate test defs (no cluster)
./run.sh --strict-coverage # hygiene gate: fail on tag/annotation drift
./run.sh --require-all # phase-exit gate: every requirement must be covered
./run.sh --record # run AND capture the evidence (see "Proof of pass")
Gating is scoped, not "all 51 always" (R-TEST-03). Three distinct checks:
--strict-coverage— hygiene (always-on, WS-TEST owns it): fails only on tag/annotation drift or a tag absent from the registry. Uncovered future-phase requirements are visible gaps in the report, not a harness failure.--requirements R-…— merge gate: selects the tagged tests to run and asserts those touched requirements are covered (a listed safety-critical one must have an L3 test).--require-all— phase-exit gate: every registry requirement must be covered.- Documented out-of-scope gaps (e.g.
R-ENV-02dev→prod promote andR-GITOPS-01state-in-git, owned by WS-INFRA/WS-GITOPS and keyed wholesale by the coarse path map) are exempted from the completeness gates via--allow-gap, wired inrun.shasDOCUMENTED_GAPSso the exemption is explicit and reviewable. (R-STATE-02node-loss used to be here; it now has a real L3 test —tests/l3-fault-injection/node-loss— and is covered, not exempted.)
Coverage vs status — two different questions
coverage.md answers "does a requirement-tagged test EXIST for R-x?" (R-TEST-04).
status.md (./run.sh --status, generator lib/status.py) answers the operator's
question — "what is the real state of each requirement given what is actually in the
repo?" — deriving three orthogonal axes per requirement:
- implementation — is there a tracked artifact naming the requirement?
- reconciliation — is that artifact reachable by walking
resources:fromclusters/<env>/kustomization.yamland expanding every FluxKustomization'sspec.path? This is what separates authored from actually reconciled: a commented-outresources:entry (e.g.platform/image-automation) is correctly reported as in-git-but-not-on-any-cluster. - verification — is the tagged test EXECUTABLE, or a TODO scaffold? Coverage counts
both as "covered"; status does not. TODO markers in a body always outrank an
executable: "true"annotation, so ambiguity never upgrades a test.
It deliberately refuses to derive proof-of-pass. Nothing tracked in git records a test
result — _artifacts/ and results/ are git-ignored and DECISIONS-LOG.md prose is not a
signal — so every requirement's proof state is reported as not-derivable rather than
defaulting to green. A status report that overstates completion is worse than none
(agents/definition-of-done.md). Closing that gap needs a committed, machine-readable
run ledger; until then the strongest claim the report makes is wired and testable.
--strict-coverage also applies status's hygiene gate (registry↔spec drift,
annotation/body conflicts, a safety-critical requirement whose only L3 test is a scaffold).
Exit codes follow ci/lib.sh: 0 pass / 1 fail / 3 skipped — a skip is never green.
run.sh is the only entrypoint. Local runs and the in-cluster CI Chainsaw Job call
the same script with the same config, so results are identical.
Artifacts (always emitted, under _artifacts/, git-ignored)
| Path | What | Consumer |
|---|---|---|
_artifacts/report.junit.xml |
JUnit — Chainsaw results, or a skipped-scaffold shim when no cluster | CI gate |
_artifacts/coverage/coverage.md |
Human requirement-coverage report | PR reviewers / logs |
_artifacts/coverage/coverage.json |
Machine coverage: {requirement: [tests]}, gaps, safety gaps |
CI gate |
_artifacts/status/status.md |
Human requirement-STATUS report derived from repo state | operator / PM |
_artifacts/status/status.json |
Machine status: implementation / reconciliation / verification per requirement | tooling |
Reproducibility contract (R-TEST-02 — what the harness guarantees)
- Single command.
./run.sh(or a tagged/layer subset) runs everything and emits the artifacts above — locally and in CI. - Hermetic. Each Chainsaw test provisions its own namespace + fixtures/probes and tears
them down (
config/chainsaw-config.yamlauto-creates/auto-deletes the namespace; tests addfinallyfor anything out-of-namespace). It never relies on pre-existing state. - Deterministic. Tool versions pinned in
versions.env; eventual consistency handled by bounded polling with explicit timeouts (config), never sleeps or wall-clock/ordering assumptions. - Isolated & parallel-safe. Unique generated namespaces + per-requirement labels; tests run concurrently without cross-talk.
- Machine-readable & requirement-tagged. JUnit + coverage, every result carrying its
R-*tags (convention intests/README.md). - Self-cleaning. Fixtures removed on pass or fail; a leaked namespace/fixture is
itself a failure (
skipDelete: false, enforced delete/cleanup timeouts). - Versioned with the code. Tests live next to what they verify and change only when the human-owned spec they encode changes — never weakened to go green (R-TEST-06).
Layout
run.sh single-command runner (the entrypoint)
versions.env pinned toolchain (Chainsaw/kubectl/Kyverno) — determinism
config/chainsaw-config.yaml shared execution contract (timeouts, ns isolation, JUnit)
requirements/registry.yaml mirror of EVERY spec R-* ID (coverage enumerates from here)
lib/
common.sh tagging convention + test discovery/selection helpers
coverage.py requirement-coverage generator (stdlib only)
status.py requirement-STATUS generator (stdlib only; --selftest)
record_run.py run-ledger writer: PROOF-of-pass (stdlib only; --selftest)
emit_skipped_junit.py Phase-0 skipped-JUnit shim (no cluster)
runs/
ledger.jsonl TRACKED append-only proof-of-pass ledger (one row per
testcase per run) — the only source status.py trusts
<UTC>-<short-sha>/ TRACKED per-run evidence: run.log + report.junit.xml
tests/
l1-rendering/ l2-behavioral/ l3-fault-injection/ meta/ (see tests/README.md)
incluster/
chainsaw-job.yaml rbac.yaml in-cluster L2/L3 Job + scoped test SA (ADR-0011)
Proof of pass — the run ledger (runs/)
--status used to report PROVEN: 0 for all 51 requirements, and said so honestly:
proof-of-pass was not recoverable from repo state. _artifacts/ is gitignored and the
root .gitignore kills *.junit.xml globally, so no run result ever reached git; the
only record of a green run was DECISIONS-LOG.md prose. runs/ is the fix lib/status.py
asked for — a committed, machine-readable run ledger.
./run.sh --record # runs normally, and captures the evidence
# -> conformance/runs/<UTC>-<short-sha>/run.log (tee'd, carries the sentinels)
# -> conformance/runs/<UTC>-<short-sha>/report.junit.xml (that run's JUnit)
# -> conformance/runs/ledger.jsonl (one appended row per testcase)
python3 lib/record_run.py --run-dir runs/<id> [--dry-run] # or record an existing run dir
python3 lib/record_run.py --selftest # deterministic, no cluster
Recording is explicit, never implicit. Plain ./run.sh writes no ledger row: a run
that silently records itself is how a bad run becomes a permanent false proof. Commit
the run dir and the ledger — an uncommitted ledger proves nothing.
Why a committed JUnit alone would be WORSE than nothing
The L2/L3 tests are runnable and self-skipping: when a precondition is missing (no
longhorn StorageClass, no Velero CRDs, fewer than 3 Ready nodes) they echo a skip token
and exit 0, and their check: accepts either outcome —
(contains($stdout, 'DR_RESTORED_FROM_OFF_CLUSTER_BACKUP_OK')
|| contains($stdout, 'DR_RESTORE_SKIPPED_OK')): true
So a self-skip exits 0 and Chainsaw records passed exactly as a real run does, and
Chainsaw's JUnit carries no stdout — its <testcase> elements hold only <properties>.
A committed JUnit on its own would therefore record DR_RESTORE_SKIPPED_OK as proof of
R-STATE-03: fake green, and worse than no ledger because it would look authoritative.
The sentinel token in run.log is the only thing that separates proven from skipped.
record_run.py derives each test's tokens from its own chainsaw-test.yaml (every
contains($stdout, 'TOKEN'); *_SKIP*_OK is a skip token, the last non-skip token is the
verdict token), so the table below is never hand-maintained:
| Test | pass token (proof) | skip token (never proof) |
|---|---|---|
l3/node-loss |
NODE_LOSS_VOLUME_AVAILABLE_OK |
NODE_LOSS_SKIPPED_OK |
l3/dr-restore |
DR_RESTORED_FROM_OFF_CLUSTER_BACKUP_OK (+ OFF_CLUSTER_TARGET_OK, BACKUPS_ARE_SCHEDULED_OK) |
DR_RESTORE_SKIPPED_OK, DR_SCHEDULE_SKIPPED_OK |
l3/data-survival |
DATA_SURVIVED_OK |
DATA_SURVIVAL_SKIPPED_OK |
l3/vm-data-survival |
VM_DATA_SURVIVED_OK |
VM_DATA_SURVIVAL_SKIPPED_OK |
l3/hands-off-update |
HANDS_OFF_UPDATE_OK |
HANDS_OFF_UPDATE_SKIPPED_OK |
l2/vm-lifecycle |
VM_LIFECYCLE_OK |
VM_LIFECYCLE_SKIPPED_OK |
l2/vm-default-deny |
VM_DEFAULT_DENY_OK |
VM_DEFAULT_DENY_SKIPPED_OK |
A row reaches proof: "proven" on one path: JUnit passed, every declared pass
token present in that test's log lines, and no skip token anywhere in them. A skip
token beats a pass token (worst wins). Anything else is skipped, failed,
junit-skipped, unknown-no-sentinel-declared or unknown-sentinel-absent — all
non-green. L0/L1 need no sentinel because lib/run_l1_offline.py already renders their
skips as JUnit <skipped/>, never as a green pass.
Staleness — a proof is a claim about a tree, not a badge
--status honours a proven row only while the run's git_sha is a descendant of the
last commit touching that requirement's implementing manifests or its verifying test.
Otherwise the row degrades to stale-proof, which is not green. A run captured from a
dirty working tree is recorded as <sha>-dirty, which no ancestry check can satisfy — so
it never counts. Re-run with --record to refresh.
A requirement reads proven only when every verifying test does; one skipped, failed
or unrecorded test drags the whole requirement down. With an empty ledger --status
behaves exactly as before: every requirement not-derivable, headline PROVEN 0.
How CI invokes it
CI (Gitea Actions, wired in T-0.2 / migrated in T-6.1b) calls this same run.sh:
- No-cluster stage (every PR, fast):
./run.sh --lintand./run.sh --coverage-only --strict-coverage --requirements <IDs the change touches>. Validates every test parses- is tagged, regenerates coverage, fails the PR on tag/annotation drift (hygiene) and on any touched requirement lacking a test (merge gate). (L0 Kyverno CLI runs alongside — task T-0.5.)
- Cluster stage (L2/L3): CI does not hold a kubeconfig. It triggers the
in-cluster Chainsaw Job (
incluster/), which runs./run.shunder the scopedconformance-runnerServiceAccount and writes JUnit + coverage to a results volume CI collects.- Merge gate: the Job runs
--requirements <IDs the change touches>; that subset runs green and those requirements are covered to merge (R-TEST-03). - Phase-exit gate: the Job runs
--layer all --strict-coverage; add--require-allonly at the milestone where the full requirement set is expected covered. The phase suite must be green before the phase's exit criteria are met.
- Merge gate: the Job runs
Phase 0 status (no cluster yet)
No cluster exists, so L1/L2/L3 cannot execute. The behavior tests are valid
scaffolds (steps + assertions authored, tagged, TODO(T-x.y) where a later phase
delivers the fixture). In this phase run.sh:
- always generates the coverage report (cluster-independent), and
- emits a skipped JUnit listing every scaffold (so the gate is green and the artifact shape is real), and
- the
meta/harness-selfcheckchecks (reproducible output, JUnit+coverage emitted, everything tagged, zero safety-critical gaps) are whatrun.sh --strict-coverageactually enforces today.
As later phases deliver capabilities, each scaffold's TODOs are filled and the test flips
from skipped to executing green — landing coverage without re-architecting the harness.