Files
home-network-k3s-impl/platform/pm-agent/configmap.yaml
T
jakman85andClaude Opus 5.5 7f0cbc7ba2
gate / gate (pull_request) Failing after 2m56s
images / images (pull_request) Successful in 32s
gate / conformance (pull_request) Has been skipped
feat(pm-agent): pin the first published agent-runner digest, start dry, and fix the token scopes
Rebased #61 onto the CI image pipeline (#81). This commit makes the remaining in-git
blockers to going live go away:

- deployment.yaml and PM_WORKER_IMAGE pin images run 340's digest (sha256:c4eba5b3...,
  tag sha-523cd9118f95 = main), read from the registry. Renovate markers unchanged.
- PM_DRY_RUN=true and PM_REQUIRE_LABEL=agent for the first run. Dry run is required, not
  just cautious: the run-340 image's baked worker template predates imagePullSecrets, so
  admission would deny its Jobs until CI re-publishes after this merge and Renovate bumps.
- Token scopes: Gitea 1.24.3 scopes GET /api/v1/user (the dispatcher's first call) under
  read:user. The documented list was missing it. Now read:user, write:repository,
  write:issue, read:package everywhere.
- Org-package read documented as a team (Packages=Read, no repos), not just a scope.
- sops is toolbox-only; the .examples say so and give the in-place edit.
- runbook: key-name check no longer emits Secret values before the pipe.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <[email protected]>
2026-10-30 01:16:21 -05:00

132 lines
8.2 KiB
YAML

---
# =============================================================================
# The dispatcher's configuration. Everything here is NON-SECRET and reviewable in a diff;
# the two credentials live in pm-agent-credentials.sops.yaml and are referenced by name only
# (R-IDP-04).
#
# WHAT IS *NOT* HERE, on purpose:
# * the PM persona — baked into the image at /etc/pm-agent/pm-persona.md. It is the
# agent's standing instruction set, and a ConfigMap is `kubectl edit`-able by anyone with
# namespace write. Changing how the PM behaves should be a reviewed commit and an image
# rebuild, not a live edit. (PM_PERSONA_FILE below can point elsewhere, which is the
# escape hatch for someone deliberately experimenting.)
# * the worker Job template — likewise baked in, and for a stronger reason: the template IS
# the shape the admission policy and the dispatcher's RBAC jointly bound. See the header
# of infra/agent/worker-job-template.yaml.
#
# NO SHELL-STYLE EXPANSIONS BELOW — AND THAT RULE APPLIES TO THESE COMMENTS TOO.
# This namespace's Flux Kustomization substitutes from cluster-vars, and envsubst runs over
# the WHOLE rendered manifest, comment lines included. So an unescaped dollar-brace token
# anywhere in this file — even in prose explaining the rule — is either replaced with the
# empty string or, if it is not a valid name, fails the ENTIRE Kustomization. This paragraph
# used to contain two such tokens as examples and the gate refused the change for it
# (ci/l0.sh, flux-postbuild-substitution: 1 UNDEFINED + 1 FATAL-PARSE), which is the check
# working exactly as intended. Every value below is a literal, including the Gitea URL — see
# the comment on it. The escaping contract itself: catalog/README.md.
# =============================================================================
apiVersion: v1
kind: ConfigMap
metadata:
name: pm-agent-config
namespace: pm-agent
labels:
app.kubernetes.io/name: pm-agent
app.kubernetes.io/part-of: pm-agent
data:
# --- where the work comes from ---------------------------------------------
# THE IN-CLUSTER SERVICE ADDRESS, NOT THE PUBLIC HOSTNAME, and for the same reason prod's
# own Flux source uses it (clusters/prod/kustomization.yaml): this path depends on neither
# public DNS, nor Cloudflare, nor the shared Gateway, nor the BASE_DOMAIN knob. A change of
# domain, a certificate problem or a Gateway outage cannot sever the agent from the
# repository it works on. It is also why the egress policy can be a pod-identity rule rather than a
# `world` allow, and why pm-worker's baked-in host allowlist can be two entries long.
PM_GITEA_URL: "http://gitea.gitea.svc.cluster.local:3000"
PM_GITEA_OWNER: "Home-Network"
PM_GITEA_REPO: "home-network-k3s-impl"
PM_BASE_BRANCH: "main"
PM_NAMESPACE: "pm-agent"
# --- what runs the work ----------------------------------------------------
# THE WORKER IMAGE, DIGEST-PINNED. This must be the SAME digest the Deployment runs, since
# the dispatcher and its workers share the committed Job template and the env-name
# contract. A tag here is refused at startup (and would be DENIED by admission anyway).
#
# THE FIRST PUBLISHED DIGEST. CI builds, verifies and — on main — publishes agent-runner
# (.gitea/workflows/images.yaml). This value is images run 340's publish (tag
# sha-523cd9118f95, which `main` pointed at), read from the registry on 2026-10-30. From here
# on Renovate replaces it with the digest the REGISTRY returns for the `main` tag, in a pull
# request that also moves the Deployment's image (same marker, same branch). Nobody pushes
# this image from a workstation.
#
# READ BEFORE TURNING PM_DRY_RUN OFF: this digest PREDATES the worker template's
# `imagePullSecrets` entry (PR #61). Its baked template has none, and admission now REQUIRES
# it — so a worker Job built from this image is DENIED. The merge that adds the entry
# changes infra/agent/**, CI re-publishes agent-runner, and Renovate's bump to that digest
# is what makes worker Jobs admissible. Until then, dry run is the only mode that works.
# renovate-digest: image=gitea.home.keithjackson.dev/home-network/agent-runner tag=main
PM_WORKER_IMAGE: "gitea.home.keithjackson.dev/home-network/agent-runner@sha256:c4eba5b3c508bf456a03391ac76f8275e7ea28a829da1450d99f6f6f25c6eb42"
# --- the model -------------------------------------------------------------
# The PM only reads a thread and answers with one JSON object, so it holds no tools and
# takes one turn. The worker does real repository work against a gate. Both run on the
# most capable general model on purpose: the failure mode that matters here is a plausible
# change that is subtly wrong, which is exactly what a cheaper tier buys more of.
PM_MODEL: "claude-opus-5"
PM_WORKER_MODEL: "claude-opus-5"
# --- pace and blast radius -------------------------------------------------
# These five numbers are the throttle. They exist because the first minute after the
# credentials are filled in is the dangerous one: every open issue is new to the agent at
# once.
#
# PM_POLL_INTERVAL_SECONDS how long an issue may wait before the PM looks at it.
# PM_MAX_ACTIVE_WORKERS concurrent worker Jobs. RAM is the binding constraint on this
# 3-node cluster and each worker's limit is 2Gi, so 2 is 4Gi
# worst case. It is also a subscription-rate-limit throttle:
# several Claude Code sessions on one subscription seat contend
# for the same account limits.
# PM_MAX_NEW_WORKERS_PER_CYCLE at most one NEW assignment per poll, so a backlog is
# drained one issue at a time rather than in one stampede.
# PM_ISSUE_COOLDOWN_SECONDS how often one issue may cost a decision. The dispatcher stamps
# this BEFORE it asks the model, so a decision that then fails
# cannot be retried on every poll.
# PM_WORKER_MAX_BUDGET_USD per-assignment spend ceiling the CLI enforces itself. It is
# Claude Code's own client-side estimate rather than a bill, so
# treat it as a runaway-loop stop, not as accounting.
PM_POLL_INTERVAL_SECONDS: "60"
PM_MAX_ACTIVE_WORKERS: "2"
PM_MAX_NEW_WORKERS_PER_CYCLE: "1"
PM_ISSUE_COOLDOWN_SECONDS: "900"
PM_WORKER_MAX_TURNS: "80"
PM_WORKER_MAX_BUDGET_USD: "10"
# --- scope -----------------------------------------------------------------
# EMPTY MEANS EVERY OPEN ISSUE, which is the behaviour this service was asked for: it
# reacts to issue creation and to comments, on all of them.
#
# RECOMMENDED FOR THE FIRST WEEKS, and a one-word change: set this to `agent`, and the
# dispatcher considers only issues a human has labelled `agent`. That bounds the agent to
# work somebody deliberately handed it while trust is being established, with no code
# change and no redeploy of anything but this ConfigMap. The operator's call; the default
# here honours the request as made.
#
# SET TO `agent` FOR THE FIRST RUN (2026-10-30, docs/plans/pm-agent-issue-to-pr.md
# follow-up 3). The label does not exist in the repository yet: create it in Gitea
# (Issues -> Labels -> New Label, name `agent`) before labelling a test issue.
PM_REQUIRE_LABEL: "agent"
# Dry run: the PM still reads threads, still asks the model and still posts its decision as
# an issue comment — so the operator can read exactly what it WOULD have done — but creates
# no worker Job and so changes no code. The honest way to watch this service for a day
# before letting it write anything.
#
# "true" FOR THE FIRST RUN, and not only for caution: the pinned digest above cannot yet
# create an admissible worker Job (see the PM_WORKER_IMAGE comment). Flip to "false" in the
# same pull request as — or after — Renovate's first agent-runner digest bump.
PM_DRY_RUN: "true"
# If the gate refuses a worker's change, the branch is NOT pushed by default and the issue
# gets the gate log instead. Set to "true" to push anyway and open a red pull request —
# useful when a human wants to see the work, noisy as a standing setting.
PM_PUSH_ON_RED_GATE: "false"