HAND-OFF 2 (L2/L3 conformance wiring) — DEFERRED with a concrete plan, per the hand-off's escape hatch (too risky to wire live cluster access from CI autonomously; do NOT hand CI a broad kubeconfig). The intended seam (in-cluster Chainsaw Job under its own scoped SA; CI holds only a narrow trigger credential) is mostly scaffolded but not safe to finish autonomously: - ci/conformance.sh still runs run.sh locally rather than triggering the in-cluster Job. - conformance/incluster/chainsaw-job.yaml has no repo-clone init-container and the stock chainsaw image lacks bash/python3/kubectl/git that run.sh needs. - No trigger SA/RBAC/credential exists, and the core blocker is a privilege-escalation design question: any `create jobs` credential in the conformance namespace can create a Job running as the privileged conformance-runner SA. This needs an admission constraint (recommended: narrow trigger SA + a Kyverno policy pinning the admissible Job shape), or a GitOps-native zero-credential trigger — an operator decision. - conformance/incluster/ isn't wired into Flux; Gitea vars/secrets aren't provisioned. docs/plans/l2-l3-conformance-ci-wiring.md captures current state, the security analysis, the functional gaps, a file-by-file step sequence, validation/rollback, and the open decisions. gate.yml's conformance placeholder now points to it (still if:false, honest). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <[email protected]>
14 KiB
L2/L3 conformance CI wiring — implementation plan
Status: PLAN — deferred, awaiting operator decision on the trigger-credential model. No cluster changes made. Author: WS-GITOSS agent, 2026-08-31 (Hand-off 2). Scope: wire the L2 (behavioural) + L3 (fault-injection) conformance layers into the LIVE Gitea Actions merge gate, running them as an in-cluster Chainsaw Job so CI holds no broad kubeconfig (docs/14 "Where each layer runs", ADR-0011, R-SEC-02).
This companions the landed Hand-off 1 (commit
27bc024:make -C ci gateparity + the comment-only R-ID scan fix). Theconformancejob in.gitea/workflows/gate.ymlis still an honestif: falseplaceholder — this plan is what turns it on safely.
1. Why this is a written plan, not a landed change
The intended seam is real and mostly scaffolded, but finishing it autonomously would mean handing a shared, live cluster a new privileged identity reachable from CI, plus building several missing functional pieces. The hand-off's rule is explicit: if wiring real cluster access from CI is too risky/ambiguous to finish autonomously, STOP and write a concrete plan — do NOT hand CI a broad kubeconfig. The blocker is a genuine privilege-escalation design question (§4), not just plumbing, and the cluster is being changed concurrently by sibling agents. So the credential model must be decided by the operator before anything is applied.
2. Current state (what exists today)
| Piece | File | State |
|---|---|---|
| Live gate workflow | .gitea/workflows/gate.yml |
LIVE. gate job runs make -C ci gate. conformance job is if: false placeholder. |
| Dormant full blueprint | .gitea/workflows/merge-gate.yaml |
Shows the intended shape: conformance job if: ${{ vars.CLUSTER_AVAILABLE == 'true' }}, secrets.CONFORMANCE_TRIGGER_KUBECONFIG, make -C ci conformance, then a merge-gate decision job (scripts/decide.sh). Manual-only (workflow_dispatch). |
| CI conformance stage | ci/conformance.sh |
SKIPS (exit 3) unless CLUSTER_AVAILABLE=true. When "on", it currently runs conformance/run.sh --layer l2,l3 locally in the CI job and collects _artifacts/. Its own header carries TODO(Phase 1): drive the in-cluster Chainsaw Job under the narrow CONFORMANCE_TRIGGER_KUBECONFIG — i.e. the trigger path is not implemented. |
| Conformance runner | conformance/run.sh + conformance/lib/, conformance/tests/ |
Works locally/in-cluster. --layer l2,l3 [--requirements ...], writes _artifacts/report.junit.xml + coverage/. Needs bash + python3 + chainsaw (+ kubectl for conf_cluster_reachable). |
| In-cluster Job skeleton | conformance/incluster/chainsaw-job.yaml |
Skeleton: generateName: conformance-run-, ns conformance, serviceAccountName: conformance-runner, image ghcr.io/kyverno/chainsaw:v0.2.12, command: ["./run.sh"], args default --layer all --strict-coverage. workspace is an empty emptyDir with no init-container to populate it, and results is an emptyDir. |
| Scoped runner RBAC | conformance/incluster/rbac.yaml |
ns conformance + SA conformance-runner + a privileged ClusterRole (namespaces create/delete/patch, pods+pods/exec, jobs create/delete, nodes get/list/patch for R-STATE-02 cordon, pods/log). Least-privilege, per-test-justified. Not reconciled by Flux (no kustomization references conformance/incluster/). |
| Runner deployment | apps/wave-1/gitea-actions.yaml |
act_runner + DinD (Docker executor). automountServiceAccountToken: false — the runner and its job containers hold NO SA token. Broad egress allowed (- {}), so it can reach the kube-API VIP 192.168.1.49:6443, but has no credential. |
| Secrets encryption | .sops.yaml (repo root) |
age recipient age175l8m…mfzg; encrypts data/stringData of *.sops.yaml under `platform |
Cluster reality: the "Phase 0 / no cluster" language in these files is stale — the dev cluster
is LIVE (Phase 6). So CLUSTER_AVAILABLE is the only remaining gate, exactly as the blueprint says.
3. Gaps to close (functional)
- Runner image.
ghcr.io/kyverno/chainsawis a minimal image;run.shneeds bash + python3 + chainsaw + kubectl, and the repo-clone init needs git. The Job cannot run./run.shon the stock chainsaw image. → Build a pinnedconformance-runnerimage (chainsawv0.2.12+ kubectlv1.36.4+ git + python3 + bash), push to the Gitea container registry, pin its digest inconformance/versions.env(CONFORMANCE_RUNNER_IMAGE). KeepCHAINSAW_VERSIONas the single source of truth the image is built from. - Repo at the commit-under-test. The Job must run the suite at the PR head SHA. → Add an
init-container (
git clone --depth 1of the impl repo, thengit checkout <SHA>) writing into the sharedworkspacevolume, using a read-only Gitea deploy token. SHA + the touched--requirementsare injected by the CI trigger step as Job env/args. - Results collection without giving CI exec/cp. The Job writes
_artifacts/to theresultsvolume; CI holds only trigger/read rights (§4). → Job's last step prints a delimited base64 tar of_artifacts/to stdout (=== ARTIFACTS-TGZ-BASE64 ===…); CI decodes it fromkubectl logs. Nopods/exec, nokubectl cp, no results PVC exposure required. (A results PVC + a read-only sidecar is the durable alternative if log size becomes a problem.) ci/conformance.shrewrite. Replace the localrun.shcall with: render the Job manifest (inject image digest, SHA,--requirements <touched>),kubectl --kubeconfig=$CONFORMANCE_TRIGGER_KUBECONFIG -n conformance create -f -,kubectl wait --for=condition=complete/failed, stream logs, decode artifacts intoresults/junit+reports/coverage, map Job success→0 / failure→1 / no-cred→3 (skip). Keep the touched-subset selection it already computes.- Flux wiring. Reconcile
conformance/incluster/(ns +conformance-runnerSA/RBAC + the new trigger SA/Role + the admission policy of §4) via a non-gating Kustomization (wait:false,dependsOn: platform-config), mirroringapps-vms— a conformance identity must never gate the app tier. - Gitea provisioning (operator, out-of-GitOps). Set repo/org
vars.CLUSTER_AVAILABLE=trueandsecrets.CONFORMANCE_TRIGGER_KUBECONFIGvia the Gitea API (PUT /repos/{owner}/{repo}/actions/{variables,secrets}/{name}). The kubeconfig embeds the trigger SA's token only. SOPS-seal the SA token in-repo (secrets/conformance-trigger.sops.yaml) for reproducibility/rotation; the Gitea secret is derived from it.
4. The security crux — trigger credential must NOT grant conformance-runner's power
Problem. Kubernetes places no use check on a Pod/Job's serviceAccountName at creation.
So any principal that can create jobs in namespace conformance can create a Job with
serviceAccountName: conformance-runner and an arbitrary command — i.e. run arbitrary code
with the privileged runner SA (nodes/patch, pods/exec, jobs, namespaces/patch). A CI-held token
with plain create jobs therefore is the privileged identity. That breaks R-SEC-02 ("CI holds
no broad cluster access") even though the token's RBAC "looks" narrow.
Recommended model — narrow trigger SA + an admission constraint (uses the existing Kyverno L0 stack):
- SA
conformance-trigger(nsconformance), Role:createonjobs;get,list,watchonjobs;getonpodsandpods/log. Nothing else. Bound only in theconformancens. - A Kyverno ClusterPolicy (validate, enforce, fail-closed) that, for Jobs created by
system:serviceaccount:conformance:conformance-trigger, ADMITS only Jobs that match the committed shape: image == the pinnedCONFORMANCE_RUNNER_IMAGEdigest,serviceAccountName == conformance-runner,command == ["./run.sh"],argsmatching^--(layer|requirements|strict-coverage),securityContextnon-root/no-privilege/no host namespaces, and no extra volumes beyondworkspace/results. Any other Job from that SA is DENIED. This is the real security boundary: it bounds CI to "run exactly the committed conformance suite, nothing else." (Equivalent: a k8s ValidatingAdmissionPolicy bound to that SA.) - The
chainsaw-conf-*per-test namespaces the runner creates are already flagged inrbac.yamlas needing exclusion from any cluster-wide disallow-privileged/host-namespaces policy for R-NET-06 — carry that exception through, documented and audited.
Alternative model — GitOps-native, zero CI cluster credential (more work, strongest): CI does
not reach the cluster at all. A ConformanceRun marker (a CR or a commit to a watched path) is
reconciled by an in-cluster controller/Flux that creates the Job from the in-repo template; the
Job publishes results back as a Gitea commit-status / a fetchable artifact that CI polls. Removes
the trigger credential entirely, at the cost of a controller and a trigger/ordering mechanism that
must complete before the merge decision. Recommended only if even the constrained trigger SA of
the primary model is deemed unacceptable.
Do NOT: give CI a cluster-admin/broad kubeconfig; give the trigger SA unconstrained
create jobs; mount an SA token into the act_runner pod; or reuse conformance-runner as the
trigger identity.
5. Concrete step sequence
Land these as separate reviewable PRs, gate-green at each step. Steps 1–5 are in-repo/GitOps and safe to land incrementally without turning L2/L3 on; only step 7 (the operator setting the Gitea var) actually enables it.
- Runner image.
conformance/incluster/Containerfile(chainsaw+kubectl+git+python3+bash); build+push to the Gitea registry; pinCONFORMANCE_RUNNER_IMAGE=<registry>/conformance-runner@sha256:…inconformance/versions.env. Add a note tying it toCHAINSAW_VERSION. - Job manifest. Rewrite
chainsaw-job.yaml: swap toCONFORMANCE_RUNNER_IMAGE; add the git-clone init-container (SHA + repo URL + read token env); parametriseargs(CI injects--layer l2,l3 --requirements <touched>); keeprestartPolicy: Never,backoffLimit: 0, non-root/seccomp/readonly-rootfs; add sane CPU/mem requests+limits (heavy L3 etcd load — seerun.shHEAVY set +config/chainsaw-config.yaml). - Trigger SA/RBAC + admission policy. Add
conformance-triggerSA + Role/RoleBinding torbac.yaml; add the Kyverno ClusterPolicy (new file underplatform/kyverno/orconformance/incluster/) constraining that SA's Jobs (§4). Add an L0 Kyverno test fixture for the policy (admit the good Job, deny a tampered one) somake -C ci l0covers it. - Flux Kustomization. New
clusters/<cluster>/conformance.yaml(or anapps-conformanceentry) —wait:false,dependsOn: platform-config,prune:true, pointing atconformance/incluster/. NopostBuild.substituteFromunless needed. Verify it reconciles Ready with the SA/RBAC/policy present and NO Job running (Jobs are created only on trigger). ci/conformance.shrewrite. Implement the trigger→wait→collect→map flow of §3.4 behindCONFORMANCE_TRIGGER_KUBECONFIG; keep exit 3 when the cred is absent (honest skip). Updateci/README.md.make -C ci gatestill SKIPS L2/L3 locally (no cred) — unchanged for humans.- Workflow. Replace the
if: falseplaceholder ingate.yml'sconformancejob with the blueprint shape:if: ${{ vars.CLUSTER_AVAILABLE == 'true' }},needs: [gate], install theconformancetoolchain,env: CONFORMANCE_TRIGGER_KUBECONFIG: ${{ secrets.CONFORMANCE_TRIGGER_KUBECONFIG }},run: make -C ci conformance. Decide: either keep the single-gatemodel (aggregategate.shalready SKIPS conformance and reports UNVERIFIED) and add conformance as a second required check, or adopt the blueprint's separatemerge-gatedecision job (scripts/decide.sh). Keep the job honest: skipped when the var is off, never faked green (HARD RULE 4). Add the conformance check to branch protection only after step 7 proves it green. - Enable (operator). Provision the SOPS-sealed trigger SA token; set the Gitea
secrets.CONFORMANCE_TRIGGER_KUBECONFIGandvars.CLUSTER_AVAILABLE=true. First run on a throwaway PR; confirm the Job is created, runs the touched subset, results are collected, and the gate blocks on a real L2/L3 failure and passes on green. Then make it required.
6. Validation & rollback
- Dry-run the admission policy before granting the trigger SA:
kubectl auth can-imatrix forconformance-trigger; attempt a tampered Job (different command) as that SA and confirm Kyverno DENIES it; attempt the committed Job and confirm ADMIT. - Fail-closed check: temporarily break an L3 test, confirm the Job fails and the gate BLOCKS
(mirrors Hand-off 1's proof that
gate.shexit 1 fails the job). - Rollback: unset
vars.CLUSTER_AVAILABLE(instant SKIP, gate reverts to L0/L1-only) and/or suspend the Flux Kustomization; delete the trigger SA token from Gitea secrets. No app-tier impact (conformance is a non-gating tier).
7. Open decisions for the operator
- Trigger model: constrained trigger SA + Kyverno admission policy (§4 primary) vs. GitOps-native zero-credential (§4 alternative). This plan recommends the primary.
- Runner image host: Gitea container registry (in-network, matches the Flux source loop) vs. ghcr.io. Recommend Gitea registry, digest-pinned.
- Gate topology: conformance as a second required check on the single-job
gate.ymlvs. restoring the blueprint's multi-jobmerge-gate.yamlwith thedecide.shdecision job. - Results transport: base64-tar-over-logs (simple, no extra rights) vs. a results PVC + read-only sidecar (durable). Recommend logs first; revisit if artifacts grow.
- Which requirements go live first: the R-NET/R-TLS/R-DNS/R-STATE tests already green against
the live cluster (per DECISIONS-LOG) are the natural first
--requirementssubset to certify through the wired path before widening.