Three corrections after rebasing onto main. 1. THE GUARD CAUGHT A REAL ONE ON ITS FIRST CONTACT WITH main. main had gained `CNPGPrimariesCoLocated` (platform/cnpg/alerts.yaml) pointing at /runbooks/cnpg-primary-spread, with no runbook. The check failed the rebase exactly as designed — 46 annotations, 35 names, 34 present — naming both the missing file AND the missing configMapGenerator entry. runbooks/cnpg-primary-spread.md now exists: what co-located primaries actually cost here (blast radius, not an outage, because instances: 3 + required anti-affinity), why the drift is uncorrectable-by-declaration (CNPG has no primary-placement field), the readiness gate that keeps the rule quiet during a real node outage, and the ~9s-per-database switchover rebalance, one cluster at a time. The 2026-09-07 outage in which all three primaries sat on one node is the reason the alert exists at all. 2. WHOLE-REPO SCOPE, NOT A HAND-WRITTEN STAGE. main's refactor replaced ci/l0.sh's per-check "UNCONDITIONAL" stages with a declaration: `conformance.home.k3s/scope: "whole-repo"`, unioned into every gate run by Stage 3b's `--include-scope`. My +38-line Stage 3f is removed (ci/l0.sh is now byte-identical to main) and the annotation is declared instead. Assertion (7) of the check was rewritten to match: it no longer asserts its own path appears in ci/l0.sh — it asserts the test DECLARES the scope and that ci/l0.sh still passes --include-scope, since neither half alone makes the check load-bearing. That matters here because ci/touched-requirements.sh maps platform/monitoring/* to "R-OBS-01 R-OBS-02", not R-OBS-04, and maps platform/kubevirt/* and runbooks/* to nothing at all. 3. A FACTUAL CORRECTION IN ALL 35 RUNBOOKS. Every page claimed `dev.sh` defaults its current-context to k3s-dev. main's `9b4744d fix(devcontainer): dev.sh defaults to prod` made that false, and a runbook that misstates which cluster a command talks to is worse than one that says nothing. The pages now say what is durably true: the default has already changed once, so naming `--context k3s-prod` is what makes a command mean the same thing next month, and the per-invocation banner is there to be read. The check's own failure message was corrected the same way. Re-verified after all three: check green at 374 assertions (46 annotations, 35/35 runbooks present, 35/35 projected), re-applied to prod, and re-probed in-cluster through the Gateway — node-down, keycloak-down, keycloak-client-secrets, cnpg-archiving, longhorn-faulted, vpn-down, node-io and cnpg-primary-spread all HTTP 200 with text/plain; charset=utf-8 and 8.9-12.1 KB of real body; /runbooks/ index 200; an unknown name 404s with a pointer rather than a blank page; and homepage still answers the apex `/`, confirming Gateway API longest-path precedence. Full merge gate: PASS (spec-immutability, lint, l0, render-golden, l1 all green; prom-rules SKIPPED for want of promtool in the image; L2/L3 SKIPPED, no cluster). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <[email protected]>
8.6 KiB
denied-flows — A spike in policy-denied network flows
Alert: HubbleDeniedFlowSpike (warning, 10m)
File: platform/monitoring/alerts.yaml, group platform-health.networking
Expression: sum(rate(hubble_drop_total{reason="POLICY_DENIED"}[5m])) > 5
What this means here
Cilium is dropping more than 5 flows/second on policy. East-west traffic is default-deny everywhere (R-NET-01): a bare workload reaches DNS and nothing else, and every allow is declared per source → destination → port (R-NET-02). So a denied-flow spike is almost always a NetworkPolicy regression — something legitimate that is no longer allowed — and only rarely a probe.
Verify the alert can even fire (measured 2026-09-13)
This alert is currently INERT. count(hubble_drop_total) returned 0 series on prod: there is no
Hubble/Cilium scrape job among Prometheus's 19 jobs, so Hubble metrics are not being collected and this
rule evaluates against nothing. Policy drops are unmonitored today — you will hear about them as
"service X cannot reach service Y", and you diagnose them with hubble observe, below. See
/runbooks/targets-down for the full list of inert rule groups.
The regression class that has actually bitten this cluster
Cilium's CVE-2025-30162 hairpin change (the expensive one). After the 1.16 → 1.20 upgrade, the
shared Gateway's L7 proxy re-checks a pod's egress policy against the destination's real backend
identity. So toEntities: world no longer covers an in-cluster call to a *.home.keithjackson.dev
hostname — the destination resolves to an in-cluster backend, not to world. Every app's SSO call
started returning 403 with server: envoy. The fix is an explicit toEndpoints allow to the
Keycloak backend, which catalog/render.py now emits for every service with
auth.mode ∈ {oidc, forward-auth}.
The durable rule that follows: any new app → app-by-hostname dependency needs its own explicit allow. If a newly added or newly SSO-enabled service is 403ing or timing out, this is the first thing to check.
A second recorded instance of the same class: Flux's source-controller was denied by
gitea-allow-gateway-ingress, whose ingress rule was fromEntities: [ingress] only — so an in-cluster
wget to Gitea simply timed out. And a matching diagnostic trap: testing HTTPS from inside a pod is
misleading here; test from outside with curl --resolve.
Running the commands in this runbook
kubectl does not work on the operator workstation. The toolchain lives only in the pinned dev
container, and the host's k3s-oidc context hangs on a browser prompt once its token expires —
that hang is not the cluster being down. Every command below runs as:
infra/devcontainer/dev.sh run bash -c 'kubectl --context k3s-prod get nodes'
Always pass --context k3s-prod explicitly. dev.sh merges BOTH clusters into one kubeconfig and
picks a current-context per invocation, and that default has already changed once — it was k3s-dev
until dev was decommissioned on 2026-09-13, and is k3s-prod now. A command that names its context means
the same thing next month as it does today; one that relies on the default does not, and the failure is
silent (it answers confidently about the other cluster). CLUSTER=prod infra/devcontainer/dev.sh run kubectl ... selects it explicitly, and every invocation prints a banner naming the cluster it is about
to talk to — read it. Do not run two dev.sh invocations at once; they share one container and
interfere.
USE FULLY-QUALIFIED RESOURCE NAMES, ALWAYS. Three CRDs on this cluster register the kind Backup:
longhorn.io/v1beta2, postgresql.cnpg.io/v1 and velero.io/v1. The bare short name resolves to
Longhorn's, which holds zero objects — so kubectl get backup -A prints "No resources found" on
a cluster holding 6 Velero backups and 27 CNPG backups. Verified on prod 2026-09-13. Reading that as
"the backups are gone" and acting on it turns a false negative into real data loss. Write
backups.velero.io, backups.postgresql.cnpg.io, clusters.postgresql.cnpg.io,
settings.longhorn.io, volumes.longhorn.io, nodes.longhorn.io.
Mutating kubectl (apply, patch, annotate, rollout) and flux reconcile are blocked for
agents here: every durable change goes through git (git push origin main is the deploy).
Where this runbook gives a mutating command it is for an operator, and it says so.
First commands
See the actual drops — this is the tool, since the metric is not collected:
infra/devcontainer/dev.sh run bash -c \
'kubectl --context k3s-prod -n kube-system exec ds/cilium -c cilium-agent -- \
hubble observe --verdict DROPPED --last 200 -o compact'
Narrow to a suspected pair:
infra/devcontainer/dev.sh run bash -c \
'kubectl --context k3s-prod -n kube-system exec ds/cilium -c cilium-agent -- \
hubble observe --verdict DROPPED --from-namespace nextcloud --last 100 -o compact'
What policies apply to the source workload, and is the policy actually enforced?
infra/devcontainer/dev.sh run bash -c \
'kubectl --context k3s-prod get ciliumnetworkpolicies.cilium.io,networkpolicies.networking.k8s.io -A; echo; \
kubectl --context k3s-prod -n kube-system exec ds/cilium -c cilium-agent -- cilium-dbg endpoint list | head -30'
Cilium's own drop counters, as a cross-check:
infra/devcontainer/dev.sh run bash -c \
'kubectl --context k3s-prod -n kube-system exec ds/cilium -c cilium-agent -- cilium-dbg metrics list | grep -i drop'
Is the 403 an Envoy/L7 verdict rather than an L3/L4 drop? (The hairpin class above shows up here, not in
hubble observe.)
infra/devcontainer/dev.sh run bash -c \
'kubectl --context k3s-prod -n <app-ns> logs <pod> --tail=50 | grep -iE "403|envoy|oidc|well-known"'
Likely causes, most likely first
1. A newly added or newly SSO-enabled service has no explicit allow to Keycloak
The CVE-2025-30162 hairpin class described above. Signature: HTTP 403 with server: envoy on a call
to keycloak.${BASE_DOMAIN} or another *.home hostname from inside the cluster, while the same URL
works from outside. Remediation: the allow is rendered, not hand-written — set auth.mode in
catalog/<service>.yaml and re-render so render.py emits the toEndpoints allow to the keycloak
backend. Do not patch a CiliumNetworkPolicy by hand; it will be overwritten.
2. A platform component was moved or a namespace label changed
fromEntities: [ingress]-only ingress rules (the Gitea/source-controller case) break any in-cluster
client. Remediation: add the specific allow in the component's networkpolicy.yaml, in git.
3. A missing dependency declaration in the catalog
dependencies: in a ServiceDefinition is what generates app→app allows (R-NET-02). A service talking to
something it never declared is denied by design. The declaration is the fix.
4. A scrape target that nothing allows
Prometheus selects every ServiceMonitor in the cluster
(serviceMonitorSelectorNilUsesHelmValues: false), so a new workload's monitor is scraped immediately
and will be denied until the component allows ingress from monitoring. Cross-read
/runbooks/targets-down.
5. An actual probe or scan
Possible, and it is why the alert is worded as a security signal (docs/07). Distinguish it by the source: a spike from outside the cluster or from an unexpected identity, rather than one named workload repeatedly failing one destination. Escalate rather than tuning policy.
When to escalate or stop
- Do not widen a policy to make drops stop. Default-deny is a safety-critical requirement here
(R-NET-01 is flagged
safety_critical: truein the requirement registry). The correct fix is the narrowest explicit allow, authored in git, usually via the catalog so it is rendered consistently. - Do not hand-edit a rendered CiliumNetworkPolicy — it comes from
catalog/render.pyand will be reverted on the next reconcile. - Escalate if the source is unexpected. An unexplained spike from outside the cluster is a security event, not a configuration bug.
- If drops coincide with a Cilium upgrade, assume the hairpin/identity class above before assuming a policy authoring mistake — the upgrade changed the evaluation, not the policy.
- Note the diagnostic trap when verifying a fix: probe from outside with
curl --resolve, because in-pod HTTPS tests to the platform's own hostnames are misleading.
Source of truth: runbooks/denied-flows.md. Index: /runbooks/
Records: DECISIONS-LOG.md (the Cilium CVE-2025-30162 world-hairpin / envoy 403 finding and its
render.py fix; source-controller denied by gitea-allow-gateway-ingress).