main became a protected branch on 2026-09-29, so the direct push that 37 of 39 runbooks instructed is REJECTED. The wording was merely stale before; it is now actively wrong, and it is the line an operator reads mid-incident. Every occurrence now describes the real path: push a branch, open a PR, merge once the gate is green -- that merge is the deploy. 35 files shared one identical block; flux-reconcile.md, README.md and plex-claim.md each said it their own way and were corrected individually. plex-claim.md is rewritten around the delivery loop and records that THE SERVER IS NOW CLAIMED (PlexOnlineToken present in /config), so PLEX_CLAIM is a permanent no-op and the page only applies after a /config wipe. Adds infra/plex/claim-ship.sh, which drives branch -> commit -> push -> PR -> gate -> merge -> reconcile -> pod roll -> verdict with a stopwatch. Three steps are easy to lose under time pressure and two are SILENT when skipped: --with-source (without it the Kustomization applies the previously-fetched revision), the mandatory rollout restart (only the ciphertext changes, so the pod template is byte-identical and nothing restarts itself), and the feat/ branch prefix (act_runner capacity is 1, and a prefix inside gate.yml's push trigger fires a redundant run that serialises ahead of the PR run). Drops the "~4-minute TTL" the page asserted in four places. It was uncited, and upstream pms-docker documents no expiry at all. The countdown on plex.tv/claim is the authority. Measured loop: ~2m45s. DECISIONS-LOG carries the PM handoff: both halves of the 2026-08-31 CI claim were false, the stale-.runner root cause, the four-deep Flux dependency cascade, and the correction that a skipped Gitea job reports success rather than hanging. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <[email protected]>
7.6 KiB
image-automation — Flux's image-update-automation cannot write back to git
Alert: ImageUpdateAutomationFailing (warning, 30m)
File: platform/monitoring/alerts.yaml, group platform-health.automated-updates
Expression: max by (namespace, name) (gotk_reconcile_condition{kind="ImageUpdateAutomation", type="Ready", status="False"}) == 1
What this means here
ImageUpdateAutomation is the write-back half of hands-off updates (ADR-0009): it commits new image
tags into git so Flux then deploys them. When it is Ready=False, stable image advances silently
stop — nothing breaks, nothing degrades, the platform just quietly stops receiving updates. That is
the R-UPD-02 failure mode this alert exists for.
Read this first: on this cluster, image automation is authored and DELIBERATELY DISABLED. It has
been that way since 2026-08-24, pending (a) a Gitea write credential for the automation to push with
and (b) flux install --components-extra=image-reflector-controller,image-automation-controller. The
line is still commented out in platform/kustomization.yaml. So:
- If this alert fires, the most likely explanation is that the feature was partially enabled —
someone uncommented the component or a rendered app started emitting
ImageRepository/ImagePolicyCRs whose controllers are not installed. - Rendered apps emit those CRs by default;
catalog/render.py --no-image-automationis the documented workaround for exactly this. - There is consequently no real incident history for this alert. Everything below is mechanism, not
post-mortem, and it says so honestly rather than inventing precedent.
This alert is currently INERT.
count(gotk_reconcile_condition)returned 0 series on prod on 2026-09-13 — there is no Flux-controller scrape job among Prometheus's 19 jobs, so everygotk_*rule evaluates against nothing. Read the CRs directly with the commands below, and see/runbooks/targets-downfor the full list of inert rule groups.
Running the commands in this runbook
kubectl does not work on the operator workstation. The toolchain lives only in the pinned dev
container, and the host's k3s-oidc context hangs on a browser prompt once its token expires —
that hang is not the cluster being down. Every command below runs as:
infra/devcontainer/dev.sh run bash -c 'kubectl --context k3s-prod get nodes'
Always pass --context k3s-prod explicitly. dev.sh merges BOTH clusters into one kubeconfig and
picks a current-context per invocation, and that default has already changed once — it was k3s-dev
until dev was decommissioned on 2026-09-13, and is k3s-prod now. A command that names its context means
the same thing next month as it does today; one that relies on the default does not, and the failure is
silent (it answers confidently about the other cluster). CLUSTER=prod infra/devcontainer/dev.sh run kubectl ... selects it explicitly, and every invocation prints a banner naming the cluster it is about
to talk to — read it. Do not run two dev.sh invocations at once; they share one container and
interfere.
USE FULLY-QUALIFIED RESOURCE NAMES, ALWAYS. Three CRDs on this cluster register the kind Backup:
longhorn.io/v1beta2, postgresql.cnpg.io/v1 and velero.io/v1. The bare short name resolves to
Longhorn's, which holds zero objects — so kubectl get backup -A prints "No resources found" on
a cluster holding 6 Velero backups and 27 CNPG backups. Verified on prod 2026-09-13. Reading that as
"the backups are gone" and acting on it turns a false negative into real data loss. Write
backups.velero.io, backups.postgresql.cnpg.io, clusters.postgresql.cnpg.io,
settings.longhorn.io, volumes.longhorn.io, nodes.longhorn.io.
Mutating kubectl (apply, patch, annotate, rollout) and flux reconcile are blocked for
agents here: every durable change goes through git. main is a protected branch — a direct push
is rejected. A change lands by pushing a branch, opening a PR, and merging it once the gate is
green; that merge is the deploy. Where this runbook gives a mutating command it is for an operator,
and it says so.
First commands
Are the controllers even installed?
infra/devcontainer/dev.sh run bash -c \
'kubectl --context k3s-prod -n flux-system get deploy | sort; echo; \
kubectl --context k3s-prod api-resources --api-group=image.toolkit.fluxcd.io'
The automation objects and their messages:
infra/devcontainer/dev.sh run bash -c \
'kubectl --context k3s-prod get imageupdateautomations.image.toolkit.fluxcd.io -A \
-o custom-columns=NS:.metadata.namespace,NAME:.metadata.name,READY:.status.conditions[?\(@.type==\"Ready\"\)].status,MSG:.status.conditions[?\(@.type==\"Ready\"\)].message,LASTRUN:.status.lastAutomationRunTime'
The controller log — the git error is always in here:
infra/devcontainer/dev.sh run bash -c \
'kubectl --context k3s-prod -n flux-system logs deploy/image-automation-controller --tail=100 2>&1 | tail -40'
Is the repo configured with a write path at all?
grep -rn "image-automation\|ImageUpdateAutomation\|components-extra" platform/kustomization.yaml bootstrap/ clusters/ 2>/dev/null | head -20
Likely causes, most likely first
1. The controllers are not installed (expected state here)
api-resources --api-group=image.toolkit.fluxcd.io returns nothing, or the deployments are absent.
Then the CRs are inert objects and the alert reflects a half-enabled feature. Remediation: either
finish enabling it (an operator runs flux install --components-extra=... — note that Flux's own
controllers were installed imperatively and carry no Flux ownership labels, so nothing under
clusters/** can install a controller or change a controller flag), or stop rendering the CRs with
catalog/render.py --no-image-automation.
2. No git write credential
The automation must push. Prod's source is http://gitea.gitea.svc.cluster.local:3000, and the
read-only source credential is not a write credential. The controller log will say authentication
failed or permission denied. Remediation: a Gitea token in a SOPS-encrypted Secret referenced by the
GitRepository/automation, added in git — and note the standing rule from the OIDC incident:
non-secret environment-specific values must not live inside an encrypted Secret, because
${BASE_DOMAIN} substitution can never reach inside one.
3. It cannot push because the branch moved
Automation commits to a branch; a force-push or a protected branch rejects it. The log names the ref.
4. The commit is being made but the Kustomization is not picking it up
Then this is not the right runbook — go to /runbooks/flux-reconcile.
When to escalate or stop
- This is a warning with a 30m
forfor a reason: nothing is broken. Do not treat it as an outage. The consequence is "no new image versions", which is measured in days. - Do not create a Gitea write credential ad hoc. It is a new secret in the DR path and belongs to the operator, SOPS-encrypted, in git.
- Do not enable the extra Flux controllers to make the alert stop. Enabling automation on a
cluster that has never run it will start proposing image bumps across every workload at once; that is
a planned change, with
/runbooks/update-rollbackas its companion. - If the alert is firing because the feature is half-enabled, the honest fix is to finish or to revert — both are git changes and both want the operator's decision.
Source of truth: runbooks/image-automation.md. Index: /runbooks/
Records: DECISIONS-LOG.md (image automation authored-and-disabled since 2026-08-24; the Flux
controllers are outside Flux's own inventory).