The in-cluster Gluetun-pod gateway (ADR-0013) cannot be steered: a pod's tun0 is invisible to the node datapath, and hostNetwork Gluetun hijacks the node's own default route (breaks k3s/etcd). The tunnel itself works (PIA egress validated), but not the steering. New decision (ADR-0015): move the tunnel to a HOST OpenVPN systemd service on egress-gateway node(s) (Ansible-managed, split-tunnel so it doesn't touch the node default route), steer egress-class=vpn pods with a CiliumEgressGatewayPolicy (native eBPF, no client-pod changes), and enforce the kill-switch with a host nftables rule (fail-closed independent of Cilium). PIA/OpenVPN-UDP provider decision (ADR-0013) stands; the .ovpn transfers over; PF re-solved host-side (Phase 6). Amended for consistency: ADR-0013 (client+steering superseded), decisions/README, docs/00, docs/01, docs/03, docs/07, agents/task-board. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <[email protected]>
Architecture Decision Records (ADRs)
ADRs are an append-only ledger of the significant technology and pattern choices for this platform. Each records the context, the decision, the rejected alternatives, and the requirements it serves. Do not edit an accepted decision in place — supersede it with a new ADR.
ADRs are specifications and are immutable to AI agents (R-TEST-06). Agents may draft a proposed ADR and escalate it, but only the human operator/architect approves/accepts or edits ADRs. See
../AGENTS.md§3 and §11.
Process (read before proposing a change)
- To change a decision, create a new ADR with the next number and set
Status: Proposed,Supersedes: ADR-XXXX. (Agents draft + escalate; the human approves.) - State what new information invalidates the old decision.
- On approval, set the new ADR
Acceptedand the old oneSuperseded by: ADR-YYYY. - Never silently re-interpret an accepted ADR (see
../AGENTS.md§3).
Template
# ADR-XXXX — <title>
- Status: Proposed | Accepted | Superseded by ADR-YYYY
- Date: <YYYY-MM-DD>
- Serves: <requirement IDs, e.g. R-NET-01, R-NET-06>
- Supersedes: <ADR-ZZZZ or —>
## Context
<forces, constraints, why a decision is needed>
## Decision
<what we chose, stated decisively>
## Alternatives considered
<options and why rejected>
## Consequences
<positive, negative, follow-ups, risks>
Index
| ADR | Title | Status | Serves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0001 | Kubernetes distribution: k3s | Accepted | R-PLAT-01 |
| 0002 | CNI & network policy & ingress: Cilium + Gateway API | Accepted | R-NET-01..07, R-DNS-01 |
| 0003 | Distributed storage: Longhorn (+ bulk tier, Velero) | Accepted | R-STATE-01..04 |
| 0004 | GitOps engine: Flux CD | Accepted | R-GITOPS-01..03 |
| 0005 | VM workloads: KubeVirt + CDI | Accepted | R-PLAT-03 |
| 0006 | TLS: cert-manager + Let's Encrypt (DNS-01) | Accepted | R-TLS-01..03 |
| 0007 | Secrets: SOPS + age | Accepted | R-SEC-01 |
| 0008 | VPN egress model: Gluetun sidecar + Cilium Egress Gateway | R-NET-05/06 | |
| 0009 | Automated updates: Flux image automation + Renovate | Accepted | R-UPD-01..03 |
| 0010 | Conformance testing: automated, reproducible, behavior-based | Accepted | R-TEST-01..06 |
| 0011 | Conformance test tooling: Kyverno + Chainsaw | Accepted | R-TEST-01..05 |
| 0012 | VPN egress: single shared in-cluster ExpressVPN gateway | R-NET-05/06/07 | |
| 0013 | VPN provider: PIA over OpenVPN-UDP + port forwarding | Accepted — provider/protocol only (client+steering superseded by 0015) | R-NET-05/06/07 |
| 0014 | Identity Provider: Keycloak (SSO via OIDC + forward-auth) | Accepted | R-IDP-01..06 |
| 0015 | VPN egress steering: node-level tunnel + Cilium Egress Gateway (host kill-switch) | Accepted | R-NET-05/06/07 |