feat(obs): wire the gate-sidecar scrape, and fix the alert that would have gone silent doing it
gate / gate (pull_request) Failing after 1m42s
gate / conformance (pull_request) Has been skipped

PR #28 gave the five fleet oauth2-proxy sidecars --metrics-address=0.0.0.0:44180 and a
named `metrics` port. This wires a scraper to them and, in the process, found a real bug
in the alert this branch added.

PodMonitor, not ServiceMonitor. Measured: no Service exposes 44180 on any of the five
(jackett/radarr/sonarr/qbittorrent/pihole all publish only their app port + authproxy
4180), so a ServiceMonitor would select nothing. A PodMonitor targets pod ports directly
and needs no change to catalog/render.py or the apps/wave-* renders and goldens.
Selector is the pod label homelab.keithjackson.dev/auth-mode=forward-auth — present on
exactly those five gate pods, absent from crafty's, which still has no metrics listener.
The property, not an app list.

THE BUG: `up{container="oauth2-proxy"}` -> `up{container="oauth2-proxy"} == 1`.

A target that is discovered but FAILING still publishes `up`, with value 0. The series
exists, so count by (namespace) returned 1, `unless` removed the namespace, and
OAuth2ProxyGateUnobserved went QUIET while nothing was being scraped at all — this
branch's own disease reproduced inside the alert written to cure it. Not hypothetical:
the PodMonitor lands five targets whose scrape is dropped, so the bare form would have
silently cleared on this very commit. Proven by mutation: reverting the `== 1` fails the
two new unit-test scenarios (got: nil) and leaves every other assertion green.

The scrape does NOT work yet, and that is documented rather than papered over. From a
pod in ns monitoring to the jackett pod, :44180 AND :4180 both time out; the shared
proxy's :44180 answers. ns jackett's default-deny is podSelector:{} with
policyTypes:[Ingress,Egress] and NO ingress key (deny-all), and the one allowance is
fromEntities:[ingress] to 4180 — the Gateway's Envoy only. The endpoint itself is
healthy: port-forwarded, /metrics returns http=200, 10208 bytes, all three oauth2_proxy_*
families including requests_total{code="302"}. Same bug and fingerprint as
platform/longhorn/networkpolicy-metrics.yaml records for Longhorn; the fix is one narrow
rule per app, and it cannot ship from this tier because oauth2-proxy and apps-wave-0 are
Flux SIBLINGS (both dependsOn platform-config), so naming ns jackett here would apply
today and fail on a cold rebuild. Needs an owner in the renderer.

Touches conformance/** : one KNOWN_EXTERNAL_MONITORS entry, which is the mechanism the
failing check explicitly instructs ("DECLARE it ... with who creates it") and which
flux-podmonitor.yaml already uses. It records that the port name was measured on prod
instead of resolved from a Service, and that the targets are currently down. That makes
this PR require a non-author review on the sensitive-path rule.

Also: ratio alert still NOT shipped. oauth2_proxy_requests_total now exists on the
endpoint but not in the TSDB, so writing it today would make it inert for exactly the
reason it was refused on 2026-09-30. Runbook gains policy-vs-no-target triage and the
radarr /signalr/messages/negotiate worked case — one orphaned browser tab, 206 identical
302s, nobody ever re-prompted.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <[email protected]>
This commit is contained in:
jakman85andClaude Opus 5 committed 2026-10-01 21:56:07 -05:00
1 parent ba79a1b59b
commit bce101d03f
9 files changed
+446 -24

No files matched your search

@@ -129,6 +129,22 @@ KNOWN_EXTERNAL_MONITORS: dict[str, str] = {
"a PodMonitor, so it resolves against POD ports, not Service ports — the Flux controller "
"Deployments (and their `http-prom` container port) are installed by the Flux bootstrap "
"manifests, not authored here. Live on prod: job flux-system/flux-system, 6 targets up.",
"platform/oauth2-proxy/podmonitor.yaml:oauth2-proxy-sidecars":
"a PodMonitor, so it resolves against POD ports, not Service ports. Unlike the other "
"entries here the target is NOT chart-owned — the `metrics` (44180) container port is "
"authored in this repo, on the oauth2-proxy sidecar in apps/wave-0/{jackett,qbittorrent,"
"pihole}.yaml and apps/wave-1/{radarr,sonarr}.yaml. It is unauditable here because NO "
"Service exposes 44180 BY DESIGN: adding one would mean changing catalog/render.py and "
"every apps/wave-* render and golden, to publish an endpoint only Prometheus should dial. "
"A PodMonitor needs no Service, which is the whole reason it was chosen. What assertion "
"(2) would have checked was instead MEASURED on prod 2026-10-01, read-only: the pods "
"declare ports [('http', 4180), ('metrics', 44180)], the selector label "
"homelab.keithjackson.dev/auth-mode=forward-auth is on exactly those five gate pods, and "
"port-forwarding 44180 returns http=200 with 10208 bytes of oauth2_proxy_* metrics. "
"CAVEAT, deliberately recorded: those targets are DOWN on prod, because the app "
"namespaces' default-deny NetworkPolicy drops the scrape from ns monitoring (same bug and "
"fingerprint as platform/longhorn/networkpolicy-metrics.yaml documents). The port name "
"resolves; the network path does not yet.",
}
MONITOR_KINDS = ("ServiceMonitor", "PodMonitor")
@@ -173,3 +173,87 @@ Everything below was measured against live prod through the pinned container, re
3. **Consider whether `--set-xauthrequest` apps should get `--api-routes`** so API paths answer
401 instead of 302. That is the fix that would make this failure *loud* rather than merely
observable, and it belongs with whoever owns the sidecar args.
---
# Round 2 — 2026-10-01: the scrape got wired, and found a bug in this branch's own alert
Added to the same PR (#29) rather than a fourth concurrent branch. PR #28 merged in the meantime
and `main` moved three PRs ahead; `origin/main` is merged in here, and the `runbooks/kustomization.yaml`
conflict was resolved by **keeping both** runbook entries (mine and `oauth2-proxy-session`).
## What changed
**`platform/oauth2-proxy/podmonitor.yaml` (new).** PR #28 gave the five fleet sidecars
`--metrics-address=0.0.0.0:44180` and a named `metrics` port. No Service exposes 44180 on any of
them, so a ServiceMonitor would have nothing to select — a **PodMonitor** targets pod ports directly
and needs no renderer change. Selects on the pod label `homelab.keithjackson.dev/auth-mode:
forward-auth`, which is on exactly the five fleet gate pods and absent from crafty's: the property,
not an app list, so a sixth forward-auth app needs no edit.
**`auth-visibility-alerts.yaml`: `up{container="oauth2-proxy"}` → `up{container="oauth2-proxy"} == 1`.
This is a real bug fix, and it is the most important thing in this round.** A target that is
discovered but failing still publishes `up`, with value **0**. The series exists, so
`count by (namespace)` returned 1, `unless` removed the namespace, and `OAuth2ProxyGateUnobserved`
would have **gone quiet while nothing was being scraped at all** — this branch's own disease,
reproduced inside the alert written to cure it. Not hypothetical: the PodMonitor lands five targets
whose scrape is dropped, so the bare form would have silently cleared on this very commit.
**Two new unit-test scenarios** pinning that: a discovered-but-failing target must still fire, and a
target that works and then breaks must re-fire rather than latch cleared.
**Docs corrected rather than appended to.** The 2026-09-30 claim "the sidecars export no metrics at
all" is now only half true and was rewritten in `runbooks/README.md`, `platform/oauth2-proxy/README.md`
and the alert header, each showing the two-step history, because each step looked like the end of it.
The runbook gains the policy-vs-no-target triage (step 1b) and the **radarr `/signalr` worked case**.
**Deliberately NOT shipped: the ratio alert.** `oauth2_proxy_requests_total` now exists on the
endpoint, but not in the TSDB, because the scrape is blocked. Writing the ratio rule today would make
it inert for precisely the reason it was refused on 2026-09-30. It becomes writable the day a scrape
succeeds, not the day a listener exists.
## What I verified
- **The endpoint serves — by payload, not by flag.** Port-forwarded to the jackett pod's 44180:
`http=200 bytes=10208`, exporting `oauth2_proxy_requests_in_flight`, `oauth2_proxy_requests_total`
(`code="200" 3`, `code="302" 2`) and `oauth2_proxy_response_duration_seconds`. `--metrics-address`
being in `args` and `/metrics` returning a body are different claims; both now hold.
- **The scrape path is DROPPED, measured from the right place.** From grafana in ns `monitoring`
(beside Prometheus, same policy position) to the jackett pod IP: `:44180` → `wget: download timed
out`; `:4180` → **also** timed out; the shared proxy's `:44180` → 200 with `oauth2_proxy_*` present.
Cause, read from the objects: ns jackett's `default-deny` is `podSelector: {}`,
`policyTypes: [Ingress, Egress]`, with an `egress` rule and **no `ingress` key** (deny-all ingress);
the only allowance is CNP `jackett-allow-gateway-ingress`, `fromEntities: [ingress]` to port 4180.
The shared proxy is scrapable only because ns `oauth2-proxy` has **no NetworkPolicy at all**.
- **No Service exposes 44180** on any of the five (enumerated).
- **The pod label selector is exact:** `auth-mode=forward-auth` on all five fleet gate pods, absent
from crafty's. Crafty's sidecar still has no `--metrics-address` (args read in full).
- **Flux ordering forbids shipping the fix from here:** `oauth2-proxy dependsOn=['platform-config']`
and `apps-wave-0 dependsOn=['platform-config']` — siblings, no ordering. A NetworkPolicy naming ns
`jackett` from this tier would apply today and fail on a cold rebuild.
- **The `== 1` guard is non-vacuous — proven by mutation.** Reverting it to the bare `up` makes the
two new scenarios FAIL (`got: nil` at 1h5m and 2h5m) and leaves every other assertion passing;
restoring it returns the suite to SUCCESS under pinned promtool v3.14.0.
- **Gate:** see the next section for the exit code and skips.
## What I did NOT verify
- **The PodMonitor has never been applied.** That it discovers the five pods is reasoned from the
measured pod labels and port name, not observed — no target list has been read with it in place,
because applying it is an operator action. **Expect `up == 0` on all five when it lands**, which is
the documented state, not a regression.
- **I did not fix the NetworkPolicy, and this PR therefore does not make the gates observable.** It
makes them *discovered*, and makes the remaining gap loud instead of silent. The one narrow rule
per app (ns monitoring → `auth-mode=forward-auth` → TCP 44180, per
`platform/longhorn/networkpolicy-metrics.yaml`) has to be rendered with each app's own policy, in
the catalog/renderer that is in flight on another branch. **It needs an owner.**
- **Whether Prometheus will actually select a PodMonitor in ns `oauth2-proxy` targeting other
namespaces.** `namespaceSelector.any: true` plus `podMonitorSelectorNilUsesHelmValues: false` and
the fact that cross-namespace ServiceMonitors/PrometheusRules already work here say yes; it is not
measured with this object.
- **No session-lifecycle claim can be made from the current window.** `AuthSuccess` is **0** on both
jackett and radarr since the PR #28 restart, so nobody has signed in and `--cookie-refresh=2m30s`
has never executed a refresh. The cookie fix is unproven in the one dimension that matters most.
- **The radarr `/signalr` finding is the coordinator's measurement, not mine** — I reproduced neither
the 206/209 sample nor the jackett 0-in-13,612. They are recorded as reported.
- **L2/L3 conformance still did not run** (`CLUSTER_AVAILABLE` unset). Nothing is certified.
+33
View File
@@ -124,3 +124,36 @@ and it reads the sidecar logs out of Loki (Alloy collects them; 72h retention).
Service port, and a ServiceMonitor selecting it. Only then does the auth-churn rule — sustained
`code="302"` as a share of `oauth2_proxy_requests_total`, held across a window longer than the
session lifetime — become writable rather than decorative.
### Update 2026-10-01: the listener exists; the scrape path does not
PR #28 added `--metrics-address=0.0.0.0:44180` and a named `metrics` container port to the five
fleet sidecars (jackett, radarr, sonarr, qbittorrent, pihole). `podmonitor.yaml` in this directory
discovers them by the pod label `homelab.keithjackson.dev/auth-mode: forward-auth` — a **PodMonitor**
rather than a ServiceMonitor because no Service exposes 44180 and adding one would mean changing the
renderer.
The endpoint is real: port-forwarded straight to the jackett pod, `/metrics` returns **http=200,
10208 bytes**, exporting `oauth2_proxy_requests_in_flight`, `oauth2_proxy_requests_total` (with
`code` labels) and `oauth2_proxy_response_duration_seconds`. That is verified by payload, not by the
flag appearing in `args` — a distinction worth keeping, because the two claims came apart here.
**The scrape is nevertheless dropped.** From a pod in ns `monitoring`, both `:44180` and `:4180` on
the jackett pod time out; the shared proxy's `:44180` answers. The only difference is that ns
`oauth2-proxy` has **no NetworkPolicy at all**, while each app namespace has a `default-deny` whose
`policyTypes` include `Ingress` with no `ingress` rules (deny-all) plus a single CNP admitting
`fromEntities: [ingress]` to port 4180 — the Gateway's Envoy and nothing else. Prometheus matches no
clause.
So the targets read `up == 0` and the TSDB is still empty for those namespaces. This is the same bug
and the same fingerprint as `platform/longhorn/networkpolicy-metrics.yaml` documents for Longhorn,
and the same narrow fix applies: ns `monitoring` → the gate pod label → TCP 44180 only. It cannot
ship from this directory, because `oauth2-proxy` and `apps-wave-0` are **siblings** in the Flux graph
(both `dependsOn: [platform-config]`), so a NetworkPolicy naming ns `jackett` would apply on today's
cluster and fail on a cold rebuild. It belongs with each app's own rendered policy.
Consequence for `auth-visibility-alerts.yaml`: its `unless` clause requires `up == 1`, not merely a
present `up` series. A discovered-but-failing target publishes `up` with value 0, so the bare form
would have cleared `OAuth2ProxyGateUnobserved` the moment the PodMonitor landed — reporting the gates
as observed while nothing was being scraped. The unit test pins that scenario; deleting the `== 1`
fails it and nothing else.
@@ -104,7 +104,67 @@ tests:
exp_samples: []
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
# 3. NO GATE, NO ALERT. A namespace with no oauth2-proxy container must never appear, or the
# 3. THE REGRESSION GUARD FOR `== 1` — the scenario that exposed a real bug on 2026-10-01.
#
# A target is DISCOVERED but every scrape FAILS: `up` exists with value 0. This is not
# hypothetical — it is the exact state podmonitor.yaml creates today, because the app
# namespaces' default-deny drops the scrape (measured; see podmonitor.yaml).
#
# With the original `unless count by (namespace) (up{container="oauth2-proxy"})`, the `up`
# SERIES EXISTS, so `count by (namespace)` returns 1, `unless` removes the namespace, and the
# alert GOES QUIET while nothing is being scraped at all — a green signal standing in for an
# absent one, which is the precise disease this whole rule was written to cure. Deleting the
# `== 1` makes THIS test fail and every other test in this file still pass, which is the
# property that makes it worth having.
- interval: 1m
name: a discovered-but-FAILING target does not count as observed (up==0 must still fire)
input_series:
- series: 'kube_pod_container_info{container="oauth2-proxy",container_id="containerd://937ae6fc",endpoint="http",image="quay.io/oauth2-proxy/oauth2-proxy:v7.8.1",image_id="quay.io/oauth2-proxy/oauth2-proxy@sha256:d62e2d81",image_spec="quay.io/oauth2-proxy/oauth2-proxy:v7.8.1",instance="10.0.1.213:8080",job="kube-state-metrics",namespace="jackett",pod="jackett-6877fcd9f5-ht9d9",service="kube-prometheus-stack-kube-state-metrics",uid="5b57d48f-e7d3-4050-9cd1-16aaaa052996"}'
values: '1x130'
# The PodMonitor target exists and never succeeds: NetworkPolicy drops the packets, so the
# scrape times out and `up` is published as 0 rather than going absent.
- series: 'up{container="oauth2-proxy",endpoint="metrics",instance="10.0.0.189:44180",job="oauth2-proxy-sidecars",namespace="jackett",pod="jackett-6877fcd9f5-ht9d9"}'
values: '0x130'
promql_expr_test:
- expr: 'ALERTS{alertname="OAuth2ProxyGateUnobserved",alertstate="firing",namespace="jackett"}'
eval_time: 65m
exp_samples:
- labels: 'ALERTS{alertname="OAuth2ProxyGateUnobserved",alertstate="firing",namespace="jackett",severity="warning"}'
value: 1
# And the inner clause itself yields NOTHING while the scrape is failing — which is the
# mechanism the alert depends on, asserted directly so a future reader can see why the
# `== 1` matters without re-deriving it. (Scenario 4 below covers the other direction:
# a succeeding scrape really does clear the alert, so `== 1` has not made the rule
# impossible to satisfy.)
- expr: 'count by (namespace) (up{container="oauth2-proxy"} == 1)'
eval_time: 65m
exp_samples: []
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
# 4. A FLAPPING target: up goes 1 -> 0 and stays there. The alert must come BACK, not latch
# cleared. Covers the ordering bug where a once-observed namespace is permanently excluded.
- interval: 1m
name: a target that starts working and then fails re-fires
input_series:
- series: 'kube_pod_container_info{container="oauth2-proxy",container_id="containerd://937ae6fc",endpoint="http",image="quay.io/oauth2-proxy/oauth2-proxy:v7.8.1",image_id="quay.io/oauth2-proxy/oauth2-proxy@sha256:d62e2d81",image_spec="quay.io/oauth2-proxy/oauth2-proxy:v7.8.1",instance="10.0.1.213:8080",job="kube-state-metrics",namespace="radarr",pod="radarr-7d55cbffb9-42hmh",service="kube-prometheus-stack-kube-state-metrics",uid="3333cccc-0000-0000-0000-000000000001"}'
values: '1x250'
# Healthy for the first 60m, then every scrape fails for the rest.
- series: 'up{container="oauth2-proxy",endpoint="metrics",instance="10.0.1.77:44180",job="oauth2-proxy-sidecars",namespace="radarr",pod="radarr-7d55cbffb9-42hmh"}'
values: '1x60 0x180'
promql_expr_test:
# Quiet while it was working.
- expr: 'ALERTS{alertname="OAuth2ProxyGateUnobserved",namespace="radarr"}'
eval_time: 55m
exp_samples: []
# Firing again an hour after it broke.
- expr: 'ALERTS{alertname="OAuth2ProxyGateUnobserved",alertstate="firing",namespace="radarr"}'
eval_time: 125m
exp_samples:
- labels: 'ALERTS{alertname="OAuth2ProxyGateUnobserved",alertstate="firing",namespace="radarr",severity="warning"}'
value: 1
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
# 5. NO GATE, NO ALERT. A namespace with no oauth2-proxy container must never appear, or the
# rule would page for every app on the platform the day someone widened the matcher.
- interval: 1m
name: namespaces without a gate sidecar are never reported
@@ -33,10 +33,18 @@
# $ promtool query instant :9090 'count by (__name__) ({__name__=~"oauth2_proxy.*"})'
# oauth2_proxy_requests_in_flight => 2 <- the SHARED proxy's two replicas. That is ALL.
#
# Every sidecar (crafty, jackett, pihole, qbittorrent, radarr, sonarr) runs with
# PARTLY SUPERSEDED 2026-10-01, and the correction matters more than the original. PR #28 gave
# the five FLEET sidecars `--metrics-address=0.0.0.0:44180` and a named `metrics` port, and the
# endpoint genuinely serves (verified by payload: http=200, 10208 bytes, all three
# `oauth2_proxy_*` families present — not merely by the flag being in `args`). podmonitor.yaml
# in this directory now discovers them. But the scrape is still DROPPED by the app namespaces'
# default-deny ingress, so the TSDB remains empty for those namespaces; and crafty still has no
# metrics listener at all. The rule below is unchanged in purpose and still has work to do.
#
# Every sidecar (crafty, jackett, pihole, qbittorrent, radarr, sonarr) ran with
# `--http-address=0.0.0.0:4180` and NO `--metrics-address`, so oauth2-proxy's metrics listener
# is never started; the container declares only port `http:4180`, there is no `metrics` port on
# any of their Services, and there is no ServiceMonitor or PodMonitor for any of them anywhere
# was never started; the container declared only port `http:4180`, there was no `metrics` port on
# any of their Services, and there was no ServiceMonitor or PodMonitor for any of them anywhere
# in the cluster (measured: `kubectl get servicemonitors,podmonitors -A`). Six gates, zero
# telemetry. An alert written against `oauth2_proxy_requests_total{namespace="jackett"}` would
# have been PERMANENTLY INERT — present, evaluating, silent, and indistinguishable from health.
@@ -81,15 +89,31 @@ spec:
# Nothing in this expression touches `oauth2_proxy_*`, so the rule cannot itself be
# inert for the reason it is reporting.
#
# MEASURED ON PROD 2026-09-30 — this expression returns six namespaces right now:
# MEASURED ON PROD 2026-09-30 — this expression returned six namespaces:
# {namespace="crafty"} {namespace="jackett"} {namespace="pihole"}
# {namespace="qbittorrent"} {namespace="radarr"} {namespace="sonarr"}
# and excludes namespace="oauth2-proxy", whose two replicas ARE scraped. It fires on
# and excluded namespace="oauth2-proxy", whose two replicas ARE scraped. It fires on
# the state the cluster is in; it is not a rule waiting for a hypothetical.
#
# `== 1` IS LOAD-BEARING, AND IT IS A BUG FIX (2026-10-01). This clause was originally
# a bare `up{container="oauth2-proxy"}`, which was WRONG in the one way that matters
# here: a target that is DISCOVERED BUT FAILING still publishes `up`, with value 0. So
# the series exists, `count by (namespace)` returns 1, `unless` removes the namespace,
# and the alert GOES QUIET while nothing whatsoever is being scraped. That is this
# branch's own disease — a green signal standing in for an absent one — reproduced
# inside the alert written to cure it. It was not hypothetical: podmonitor.yaml lands
# five targets whose scrape is DROPPED by NetworkPolicy (measured; see that file), so
# the bare form would have silently cleared on the very next commit. `== 1` means
# "observed" requires a scrape that actually succeeds.
#
# A failing target is therefore reported by BOTH this rule and kube-prometheus-stack's
# generic TargetDown. That duplication is deliberate: TargetDown says "a target is
# down", this says "an authentication gate is unobserved", and during an incident those
# are different sentences. The overlap is the cheap half of the trade.
expr: |
count by (namespace) (kube_pod_container_info{container="oauth2-proxy"})
unless
count by (namespace) (up{container="oauth2-proxy"})
count by (namespace) (up{container="oauth2-proxy"} == 1)
# 1h, not 5m: a rollout briefly has a running sidecar whose target has not been
# discovered yet, and this condition is a standing architectural gap, never an
# emergency. Long enough that no deploy can produce it.
+5
View File
@@ -18,3 +18,8 @@ resources:
# for the same reason it does: monitoring.coreos.com CRDs are registered by the `platform`
# tier, which is Ready before this tier's platform-config dependency completes.
- auth-visibility-alerts.yaml
# Discovers the PER-APP gate sidecars' :44180 metrics endpoints by pod label (PR #28 added the
# listener; no Service exposes it, so this is a PodMonitor, not a ServiceMonitor). The scrape is
# still denied by the app namespaces' default-deny ingress — read podmonitor.yaml's header
# before concluding the targets should be up.
- podmonitor.yaml
+109
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,109 @@
---
# PodMonitor for the PER-APP oauth2-proxy gate sidecars (R-OBS-04).
#
# ============================================================================================
# WHY A PodMonitor AND NOT A ServiceMonitor
# ============================================================================================
# PR #28 gave all five fleet sidecars `--metrics-address=0.0.0.0:44180` and a named `metrics`
# container port. It did NOT add a Service port, and measured on prod 2026-10-01 none of the five
# Services exposes 44180:
#
# jackett jackett: [('port-9117', 9117), ('authproxy', 4180)]
# radarr radarr: [('port-7878', 7878), ('authproxy', 4180)]
# sonarr sonarr: [('port-8989', 8989), ('authproxy', 4180)]
# qbittorrent qbittorrent: [('port-8080', 8080), ('authproxy', 4180)]
# pihole pihole: [('port-80', 80), ('authproxy', 4180)]
#
# A ServiceMonitor selects Service PORTS, so it would have nothing to select. A PodMonitor targets
# pod ports directly and bypasses Services entirely — so this needs no change to the Services, and
# therefore no change to `catalog/render.py` or the `apps/wave-*` renders and goldens.
#
# SELECTOR: the `homelab.keithjackson.dev/auth-mode: forward-auth` POD LABEL, not a namespace list.
# Measured 2026-10-01: that label is present on exactly the five fleet gate pods (jackett, radarr,
# sonarr, qbittorrent, pihole) and absent from crafty's, which is a separately-managed deployment
# (platform/crafty) that still has no `--metrics-address` at all. So the selector describes the
# PROPERTY being scraped rather than enumerating today's apps, and a sixth forward-auth app is
# picked up with no edit here. `namespaceSelector.any: true` because those five namespaces are
# created by the apps-wave-0/1 tiers, which this tier does not and must not depend on.
#
# ============================================================================================
# READ THIS BEFORE BELIEVING THE TARGETS ARE UP: THE SCRAPE IS CURRENTLY DENIED BY NETWORKPOLICY
# ============================================================================================
# This PodMonitor is NECESSARY AND NOT SUFFICIENT. The endpoint serves, and the path from ns
# monitoring is blocked. Both halves measured on prod 2026-10-01, read-only:
#
# THE ENDPOINT IS HEALTHY — port-forward straight to the jackett pod's 44180:
# GET /metrics -> http=200 bytes=10208
# # TYPE oauth2_proxy_requests_in_flight gauge
# # TYPE oauth2_proxy_requests_total counter
# # TYPE oauth2_proxy_response_duration_seconds histogram
# oauth2_proxy_requests_total{code="200"} 3
# oauth2_proxy_requests_total{code="302"} 2
#
# THE SCRAPE PATH IS DROPPED — from a pod in ns monitoring (grafana, which sits beside
# Prometheus and so occupies the same policy position) to the jackett pod IP:
# http://10.0.0.189:44180/metrics -> wget: download timed out
# http://10.0.0.189:4180/ping -> wget: download timed out (even the "allowed" port)
# http://<shared-proxy>:44180/metrics -> 200, oauth2_proxy_* present (control: ns oauth2-proxy
# has NO NetworkPolicy, which is the only reason the
# shared instance has ever been scrapable)
#
# WHY: ns jackett's `default-deny` NetworkPolicy is `podSelector: {}` with
# `policyTypes: [Ingress, Egress]` and an `egress` rule ONLY — no `ingress` key, which in
# NetworkPolicy semantics is deny-all-ingress. The only ingress allowance is the CNP
# `jackett-allow-gateway-ingress`: `fromEntities: [ingress]` to port 4180 — the Gateway's Envoy
# and nothing else. Prometheus matches no clause and its packets are dropped, not refused.
#
# SO THE TARGETS BELOW WILL READ `up == 0` UNTIL AN INGRESS ALLOWANCE LANDS. That is a known,
# measured, documented state — NOT a regression introduced here, and NOT something to silence.
# It is deliberately left visible: `OAuth2ProxyGateUnobserved` in auth-visibility-alerts.yaml
# requires `up == 1`, precisely so a discovered-but-failing target does not read as "observed"
# (see that file's header — this exact trap is why the `== 1` is there).
#
# THIS IS THE SAME BUG LONGHORN HAD, and the platform has a documented fix idiom for it:
# platform/longhorn/networkpolicy-metrics.yaml, whose header records the identical fingerprint
# measured on 2026-09-13 — ServiceMonitor in place, 3 targets DISCOVERED, `up` 0/0/0, TSDB empty,
# `lastError: context deadline exceeded` (a drop, not a refusal). The fix there is a narrow
# additive `networking.k8s.io/v1` NetworkPolicy: ns monitoring -> the pod label, that one port.
#
# WHY THAT POLICY IS NOT IN THIS DIRECTORY. It would have to be five objects, one per app
# namespace, and those namespaces are created by apps-wave-0/1. Measured Flux graph, 2026-10-01:
# oauth2-proxy dependsOn=['platform-config'] <- this tier
# apps-wave-0 dependsOn=['platform-config'] <- SIBLING, no ordering between them
# apps-wave-1 dependsOn=['apps-wave-0']
# They are siblings, so on a cold bootstrap there is no guarantee ns jackett exists when this tier
# applies, and a NetworkPolicy naming a missing namespace fails to apply. It would work on today's
# running cluster and break on a rebuild — the "works now, broken on restore" shape this repo
# keeps paying for. Longhorn's precedent is safe only because longhorn-system is created by the
# same tier that ships its policy. The allowance therefore belongs WITH THE APPS, rendered next to
# the rest of each app's network policy — i.e. in the catalog/renderer, which is in flight on
# another branch. Tracked in the handoff; it is one narrow rule per app, not a redesign.
apiVersion: monitoring.coreos.com/v1
kind: PodMonitor
metadata:
name: oauth2-proxy-sidecars
namespace: oauth2-proxy
labels:
release: kube-prometheus-stack # kube-prometheus-stack's podMonitorSelector
app.kubernetes.io/name: oauth2-proxy
homelab.keithjackson.dev/purpose: metrics-scrape
spec:
namespaceSelector:
# The gate sidecars live in the app namespaces, not this one. `any` rather than a fixed list so
# a new forward-auth app needs no edit here — the pod label below is what scopes this.
any: true
selector:
matchLabels:
# The PROPERTY, not the app list. Present on exactly the five fleet gate pods (measured
# 2026-10-01); absent from crafty, which has no metrics listener yet.
homelab.keithjackson.dev/auth-mode: forward-auth
podMetricsEndpoints:
# By PORT NAME (`metrics`, 44180), never by number: the name is what PR #28 declared on the
# container, and a numeric port here would silently stop matching if the port were renumbered.
- port: metrics
path: /metrics
interval: 30s
# 10s, matching the drop signature above: a DENIED path does not refuse, it hangs until the
# scrape times out. Leaving the default would make each failing target hold a scrape slot for
# the full interval.
scrapeTimeout: 10s
+28 -10
View File
@@ -51,18 +51,36 @@ rule groups still evaluate against nothing and **cannot fire**:
| Flux (`gotk_*`) | `FluxReconciliationFailure`, `FluxResourceSuspended`, `ImageUpdateAutomationFailing`, `ImagePolicyStalled`, `UpdateHealthGateFailed` |
| Hubble (`hubble_drop_total`) | `HubbleDeniedFlowSpike` |
| etcd (`kubeEtcd` disabled for k3s, deliberately) | no etcd fsync alerting exists at all |
| per-app oauth2-proxy sidecars (`oauth2_proxy_*`) — measured 2026-09-30 | no authentication alerting exists at all for crafty, jackett, pihole, qbittorrent, radarr, sonarr |
| per-app oauth2-proxy sidecars (`oauth2_proxy_*`) — updated 2026-10-01 | no authentication alerting exists at all for crafty, jackett, pihole, qbittorrent, radarr, sonarr |
The oauth2-proxy row is the newest and the least obvious, because the scrape is not merely missing —
there is **nothing to scrape**. `count by (__name__) ({__name__=~"oauth2_proxy.*"})` on prod returns
The oauth2-proxy row is the newest, and it has **moved twice in two days** — worth reading in order,
because each step looked like the end of it.
**2026-09-30 — nothing to scrape.** `count by (__name__) ({__name__=~"oauth2_proxy.*"})` returned
exactly one family, `oauth2_proxy_requests_in_flight`, from the two replicas of the **shared**
forward-auth instance in the `oauth2-proxy` namespace. The six per-app gate sidecars run without
`--metrics-address`, so their metrics listener never starts; they declare no `metrics` container port;
and no ServiceMonitor or PodMonitor selects them. Any rule written against `oauth2_proxy_*` for those
namespaces would be inert on arrival. `OAuth2ProxyGateUnobserved`
(`platform/oauth2-proxy/auth-visibility-alerts.yaml`) alerts on that gap itself, using
`kube_pod_container_info` and `up` — two families that *are* scraped — and clears when a gate gains a
real scrape. See `oauth2-proxy-auth-failures`.
forward-auth instance. All six per-app gate sidecars ran without `--metrics-address`, so their metrics
listener never started, and no ServiceMonitor or PodMonitor selected them.
**2026-10-01 — the listener exists, and the scrape is still blocked.** PR #28 added
`--metrics-address=0.0.0.0:44180` and a named `metrics` port to the five fleet sidecars, and the
endpoint genuinely serves (port-forwarded: `http=200`, 10208 bytes, all three `oauth2_proxy_*`
families, `oauth2_proxy_requests_total{code="302"}` present). `platform/oauth2-proxy/podmonitor.yaml`
now discovers them by pod label. **But the app namespaces' `default-deny` NetworkPolicy drops the
scrape**: from a pod in ns `monitoring`, both `:44180` and `:4180` on the jackett pod time out, while
the shared proxy's `:44180` answers — the only difference being that ns `oauth2-proxy` has no
NetworkPolicy at all. So the targets are discovered and `up == 0`, and the TSDB is still empty for
those namespaces. **This is the same bug Longhorn had**, with the same fingerprint; the fix idiom is
`platform/longhorn/networkpolicy-metrics.yaml` (ns monitoring → one pod label → one port), and for
these apps it has to be rendered alongside each app's own policy rather than shipped from the
oauth2-proxy tier, which is a *sibling* of `apps-wave-0` in the Flux graph and so cannot rely on those
namespaces existing yet.
`OAuth2ProxyGateUnobserved` (`platform/oauth2-proxy/auth-visibility-alerts.yaml`) alerts on the gap
itself from `kube_pod_container_info` and `up` — two families that *are* scraped. Note its `up == 1`:
a discovered-but-failing target publishes `up` with value **0**, so the earlier bare form would have
gone quiet the moment the PodMonitor landed, while nothing was being scraped. That near-miss is the
whole reason to distrust a cleared alert here. Crafty remains outside all of this — no metrics
listener at all. See `oauth2-proxy-auth-failures`.
Each affected runbook says so on its own page and gives the by-hand equivalent. See `targets-down`.
+80 -7
View File
@@ -42,12 +42,14 @@ signature of the session being **re-established over and over instead of held**
another proxy is overwriting, or a cookie that never comes back at all — not of Keycloak being
down and not of the app being broken.
**Read this before you trust any silence:** the per-app gate sidecars export **no metrics**. They
run without `--metrics-address`, so oauth2-proxy's metrics listener never starts; they declare no
`metrics` port; and no ServiceMonitor or PodMonitor selects them. Only the shared
`oauth2-proxy` namespace instance is scraped, and it is not in the data path for any of these
apps. So there is nothing to graph and nothing that could have alerted. The logs below are not a
convenience — until that changes they are the **only** record that this class of failure happened.
**Read this before you trust any silence (updated 2026-10-01).** The five fleet gate sidecars now
*do* run a metrics listener on `:44180`, and `platform/oauth2-proxy/podmonitor.yaml` discovers
them — but **the scrape is dropped by the app namespaces' `default-deny` NetworkPolicy**, so those
targets read `up == 0` and the TSDB holds nothing for them. Crafty has no listener at all. Only
the shared `oauth2-proxy` namespace instance is genuinely scraped, and it is not in the data path
for any of these apps. So there is still nothing to graph and nothing that could have alerted.
**The logs below remain the only record that this class of failure happened.** Check which state
you are in before you trust a quiet dashboard — "First commands" step 1 tells you in one query.
## First commands
@@ -60,9 +62,49 @@ with an explicit context.
infra/devcontainer/dev.sh run bash -c \
'kubectl --context k3s-prod -n monitoring exec prometheus-kube-prometheus-stack-prometheus-0 \
-c prometheus -- /bin/promtool query instant http://localhost:9090 \
"count by (namespace) (kube_pod_container_info{container=\"oauth2-proxy\"}) unless count by (namespace) (up{container=\"oauth2-proxy\"})"'
"count by (namespace) (kube_pod_container_info{container=\"oauth2-proxy\"}) unless count by (namespace) (up{container=\"oauth2-proxy\"} == 1)"'
```
**1b. If a namespace is listed, is it "no target" or "target failing"?** The two need different
fixes and the alert deliberately does not distinguish them:
```
infra/devcontainer/dev.sh run bash -c \
'kubectl --context k3s-prod -n monitoring exec prometheus-kube-prometheus-stack-prometheus-0 \
-c prometheus -- /bin/promtool query instant http://localhost:9090 \
"up{container=\"oauth2-proxy\"}"'
```
No series for the namespace → nothing discovers it (no PodMonitor match; check the pod carries
`homelab.keithjackson.dev/auth-mode=forward-auth` and a named `metrics` port). A series with
value **0** → discovered but every scrape fails; get the reason from the target's `lastError`:
```
infra/devcontainer/dev.sh run bash -c \
'kubectl --context k3s-prod -n monitoring port-forward svc/kube-prometheus-stack-prometheus 19090:9090 & sleep 5; \
curl -s localhost:19090/api/v1/targets | python3 -c "
import json,sys
for t in json.load(sys.stdin)[\"data\"][\"activeTargets\"]:
if t[\"labels\"].get(\"container\")==\"oauth2-proxy\":
print(t[\"labels\"].get(\"namespace\"), t[\"health\"], t.get(\"lastError\",\"\")[:90])"'
```
`context deadline exceeded` is a **drop**, not a refusal — that is NetworkPolicy, not a dead
endpoint. Confirm the endpoint itself is fine by port-forwarding straight to the pod, which
bypasses policy entirely:
```
infra/devcontainer/dev.sh run bash -c \
'kubectl --context k3s-prod -n jackett port-forward \
$(kubectl --context k3s-prod -n jackett get pod -l app.kubernetes.io/name=jackett -o name | head -1) \
14418:44180 & sleep 5; curl -s -o /dev/null -w "http=%{http_code} bytes=%{size_download}\n" \
http://127.0.0.1:14418/metrics'
```
`http=200` with a few KB means the listener is healthy and the path is what is broken. As of
2026-10-01 that is the state of all five fleet apps, and the fix is an ingress allowance from ns
`monitoring` to port 44180 — see `platform/longhorn/networkpolicy-metrics.yaml` for the idiom.
**2. The sidecar log — but you must grep it.** The gate's stdout is ~11,500 lines a day per app
and almost all of it is the kubelet health probe (`GET "/ping" ... 200`). A plain
`kubectl logs --tail=100` shows you nothing but `/ping` and looks perfectly healthy. Filter:
@@ -105,6 +147,37 @@ ratio in the tens means sessions are not surviving. Measured on prod 2026-09-30
All three of those are the failure, not the baseline.
**The cleanest worked case of all — radarr, measured 2026-10-01.** After the cookie fix landed,
jackett dropped to **0** `No valid authentication` lines in 13,612 (from 39), and `removing
session` / `cookie signature not valid` went to **0 on both apps** (radarr had 8 and 8 before).
The eviction fingerprint is gone. But radarr still logged **206** rejections — and sampling 209 of
them, **every single one was the same request**:
GET "/signalr/messages/negotiate" ... 302 <- browser UA, over and over
That is one left-open browser tab. Its cookie is gone, its SignalR socket keeps trying to
reconnect, and every attempt is silently 302'd to Keycloak. Nobody is at the keyboard, so nobody
is ever re-prompted; the tab just sits there looking like a working page that has stopped
updating. **This is the entire failure class in one line**: a non-navigation request answered with
a redirect, forever, with no error surfaced anywhere.
So when you read a rejection count, **always group by request path before concluding anything**:
```
infra/devcontainer/dev.sh run bash -c \
'kubectl --context k3s-prod -n radarr logs deploy/radarr -c oauth2-proxy --since=24h \
| grep -v "/ping" | grep "No valid authentication" -A 1 \
| grep -oE "\"[^\"]+\" HTTP" | sort | uniq -c | sort -rn | head'
```
One path dominating means an orphaned client, not a broken gate — annoying but harmless, and it
clears when the tab is closed. Many different paths from one session means the session itself is
not surviving, which is the real defect. A per-app `--api-route` is the structural fix for the
first shape: it makes those paths answer **401** instead of 302, so the client fails loudly
instead of looping. Note that a count of **0 `AuthSuccess`** alongside a high rejection count
means nobody has signed in since the last restart — so `--cookie-refresh` has never run, and no
session-lifecycle conclusion can be drawn from that window at all.
**4. Did the gate admit the user, or did the app refuse them?** Look for the `[AuthSuccess]` line
and what follows it. If `[AuthSuccess]` appears and the very next thing is the *app's own* login
page or the app's 401, the gate did its job and layer 3 is your problem — that is the Crafty