Commit Graph
5 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
jakman85andClaude Opus 5 81f627167d docs(obs): record that the gate-sidecar scrape works — four places still said it did not
gate / gate (pull_request) Successful in 1m48s
gate / conformance (pull_request) Has been skipped
PR #49 (merged 21c88b0) fixed the blocked scrape and it is verified working on prod
2026-10-05: all 6 targets up == 1, health=up, lastError='', lastScrapeDuration 0.001-0.006s
against 10.0s and "context deadline exceeded" before. oauth2_proxy_* is in the TSDB for
these namespaces for the first time (5 metric names, 148 series).

Four places in the tree still asserted the pre-fix state as current, in the present tense,
in the files a reader consults first:

  platform/oauth2-proxy/podmonitor.yaml  "READ THIS BEFORE BELIEVING THE TARGETS ARE UP:
    THE SCRAPE IS CURRENTLY DENIED BY NETWORKPOLICY" and "SO THE TARGETS BELOW WILL READ
    up == 0 UNTIL AN INGRESS ALLOWANCE LANDS". The first actively instructs the reader to
    disbelieve a correct up == 1. Now a STATUS block with the post-fix numbers, with the
    diagnosis kept below it under an explicit HISTORY heading because it is why the fix is
    shaped the way it is.
  catalog/render.py:159  "THIS IS THE PREREQUISITE ONLY, AND IT IS NOT YET SCRAPED".
  catalog/render.py:1365  the same claim on the sidecar arg.
  platform/oauth2-proxy/README.md  its subsections are dated and so are honest records, but
    a reader hits the stale body long before any correction. A SUPERSEDED pointer now sits
    under the heading and an Update 2026-10-05 section carries the before/after.

The "not scraped" claims are corrected; the "a flag alone is not enough" warning is KEPT
deliberately, because that part is still true and "flag without ingress allowance" is
exactly what caused the 63.7h outage.

Two substantive errors fixed while there, not just tense. The README's "three things are
needed" listed a Service port and a ServiceMonitor — wrong, a PodMonitor targets pod ports
directly, which is why no Service exposes 44180 and the renderer needed no Service change;
following it would have sent someone to edit Service rendering for nothing. And
podmonitor.yaml deferred the fix to "the catalog/renderer, in flight on another branch" —
no such branch existed; it now names r_monitoring_ingress_policy, with a new CRAFTY section
explaining the one namespace this file cannot help.

Comments only in render.py, so the rendered output is byte-identical: no apps/ file and no
golden changes, and therefore no sensitive path and no human approval needed — the opposite
of the PR this documents.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <[email protected]>
2026-10-05 21:18:33 -05:00
jakman85andClaude Opus 5 bce101d03f feat(obs): wire the gate-sidecar scrape, and fix the alert that would have gone silent doing it
gate / gate (pull_request) Failing after 1m42s
gate / conformance (pull_request) Has been skipped
PR #28 gave the five fleet oauth2-proxy sidecars --metrics-address=0.0.0.0:44180 and a
named `metrics` port. This wires a scraper to them and, in the process, found a real bug
in the alert this branch added.

PodMonitor, not ServiceMonitor. Measured: no Service exposes 44180 on any of the five
(jackett/radarr/sonarr/qbittorrent/pihole all publish only their app port + authproxy
4180), so a ServiceMonitor would select nothing. A PodMonitor targets pod ports directly
and needs no change to catalog/render.py or the apps/wave-* renders and goldens.
Selector is the pod label homelab.keithjackson.dev/auth-mode=forward-auth — present on
exactly those five gate pods, absent from crafty's, which still has no metrics listener.
The property, not an app list.

THE BUG: `up{container="oauth2-proxy"}` -> `up{container="oauth2-proxy"} == 1`.

A target that is discovered but FAILING still publishes `up`, with value 0. The series
exists, so count by (namespace) returned 1, `unless` removed the namespace, and
OAuth2ProxyGateUnobserved went QUIET while nothing was being scraped at all — this
branch's own disease reproduced inside the alert written to cure it. Not hypothetical:
the PodMonitor lands five targets whose scrape is dropped, so the bare form would have
silently cleared on this very commit. Proven by mutation: reverting the `== 1` fails the
two new unit-test scenarios (got: nil) and leaves every other assertion green.

The scrape does NOT work yet, and that is documented rather than papered over. From a
pod in ns monitoring to the jackett pod, :44180 AND :4180 both time out; the shared
proxy's :44180 answers. ns jackett's default-deny is podSelector:{} with
policyTypes:[Ingress,Egress] and NO ingress key (deny-all), and the one allowance is
fromEntities:[ingress] to 4180 — the Gateway's Envoy only. The endpoint itself is
healthy: port-forwarded, /metrics returns http=200, 10208 bytes, all three oauth2_proxy_*
families including requests_total{code="302"}. Same bug and fingerprint as
platform/longhorn/networkpolicy-metrics.yaml records for Longhorn; the fix is one narrow
rule per app, and it cannot ship from this tier because oauth2-proxy and apps-wave-0 are
Flux SIBLINGS (both dependsOn platform-config), so naming ns jackett here would apply
today and fail on a cold rebuild. Needs an owner in the renderer.

Touches conformance/** : one KNOWN_EXTERNAL_MONITORS entry, which is the mechanism the
failing check explicitly instructs ("DECLARE it ... with who creates it") and which
flux-podmonitor.yaml already uses. It records that the port name was measured on prod
instead of resolved from a Service, and that the targets are currently down. That makes
this PR require a non-author review on the sensitive-path rule.

Also: ratio alert still NOT shipped. oauth2_proxy_requests_total now exists on the
endpoint but not in the TSDB, so writing it today would make it inert for exactly the
reason it was refused on 2026-09-30. Runbook gains policy-vs-no-target triage and the
radarr /signalr/messages/negotiate worked case — one orphaned browser tab, 206 identical
302s, nobody ever re-prompted.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <[email protected]>
2026-10-01 21:56:07 -05:00
jakman85andClaude Opus 5 fc7ec01628 feat(obs): make oauth2-proxy auth failures visible — alert on the gap, not on absent metrics
gate / gate (pull_request) Successful in 1m42s
gate / conformance (pull_request) Has been skipped
Jackett failed on 2026-09-30 in the most expensive way available: HTTP 200 and a
plausible page. oauth2-proxy answers an unauthenticated XHR with a 302 to Keycloak
rather than a 401; the browser follows it silently against a live SSO session and
the call resolves 200 carrying a 44 KB HTML dashboard where the app's JavaScript
wanted JSON. The user is never re-prompted, reloading never helps, and every uptime
check stays green. `jackett-down` watches replicas_available, which was 1 throughout.

The reason nothing alerted turns out not to be a missing rule. Measured on prod:

    count by (__name__) ({__name__=~"oauth2_proxy.*"})
      oauth2_proxy_requests_in_flight => 2

Two series, both from the SHARED forward-auth Deployment. The six per-app gate
sidecars (crafty, jackett, pihole, qbittorrent, radarr, sonarr) publish nothing at
all: no --metrics-address, so the metrics listener never starts; no `metrics`
container port; no ServiceMonitor or PodMonitor selects them. The alert the incident
calls for — sustained auth redirects to an authenticated user — is therefore NOT
WRITABLE, and writing it anyway would have shipped a rule that is present,
evaluating, permanently silent and indistinguishable from health.

So alert on the condition that made the incident invisible, from families that ARE
scraped:

  OAuth2ProxyGateUnobserved
    count by (namespace) (kube_pod_container_info{container="oauth2-proxy"})
      unless
    count by (namespace) (up{container="oauth2-proxy"})

kube_pod_container_info is kube-state-metrics (a declared scrape owner) and sees the
container whether or not it exports anything; `up` is UNIVERSAL and carries a
`container` label for any target, so the rule needs no advance knowledge of what job
name a future per-app scrape picks. Nothing in it touches oauth2_proxy_*, so it
cannot be inert for the reason it is reporting. Run verbatim against live prod it
returns six namespaces and correctly excludes oauth2-proxy. It clears per namespace
as each gate gains a real scrape.

Also:
- promtool companion test pinning all four states: fires unscraped, quiet when
  scraped, honours for:1h, and STOPS once a scrape appears under a different job name.
- runbooks/oauth2-proxy-auth-failures.md — tell the gate's refusal from the group
  check from the app's own login from an XHR that silently got HTML, with the
  2026-09-30 jackett trace as the worked example and the Loki queries to use while
  there are no metrics. Registered in the configMapGenerator and README.
- runbooks/README.md gains an inert-alerts row for the unscraped sidecars.

Rejected: an alert on the shared proxy's oauth2_proxy_requests_total ratio. It needs
a conformance/ SCRAPE_OWNERS entry (human approval) and, decisively, would not have
fired on this incident — the shared instance is not in any sidecar-gated app's data
path and its current pods have proxied nothing. It would have looked like coverage
and been none.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <[email protected]>
2026-09-30 10:55:19 -05:00
jakman85andClaude Opus 4.8 3e7e9386a0 feat(oauth2-proxy): forward-auth ext_authz enforcement mechanism + group floor
Build the deferred forward-auth ENFORCEMENT for non-OIDC UIs (pihole/*arr/
qbittorrent/homepage; Crafty next), gated by Keycloak via oauth2-proxy.

- helmrelease: add `--allowed-groups=platform-admins` (R-IDP-06 floor:
  authenticated AND in group) + `--skip-provider-button` (302 straight to
  Keycloak; verified the interstitial 403 sign-in page otherwise).
- forward-auth-cec.yaml: interim self-authored CiliumClusterwideEnvoyConfig
  ext_authz listener -> oauth2-proxy /oauth2/auth, failure_mode_allow:false,
  per-route opt-in via virtualHost. TEMPLATE — not Flux-wired (PM deploys with
  an L2 VIP + DNS repoint). The ext_authz stanza is verified in-cluster.
- README: document the mechanism, why per-route ext_authz on the shared Gateway
  is NOT clean on Cilium 1.16.5 (machine-owned cilium-gateway-shared CEC; native
  ExternalAuth/GEP-1494 in no released Cilium), the three options + recommendation,
  the opt-in steps, the in-cluster proof, and the human browser test.

Keycloak `oauth2-proxy` client already carries the callback redirect URI + a
bare `groups` claim (full.path=false) — no realm change needed.

Proof (cilium-envoy v1.30.8): a standalone envoy running this exact ext_authz
stanza against the live oauth2-proxy denied unauthenticated requests (403,
oauth2-proxy sign-in body; upstream never served), while a no-filter control
route on the same backend returned 200. R-IDP-02 property holds.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <[email protected]>
2026-08-28 15:18:47 -05:00
jakman85andClaude Opus 4.8 af4f6c07ae T-0.1 Flux GitOps layout + dev/prod overlays + platform component skeletons (R-GITOPS-01/03, R-ENV-02, R-PLAT-01)
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <[email protected]>
2026-08-16 00:08:31 -05:00