My previous commit converted =~ to contains() but kept flow style
'check: { (contains($stdout, 'X')): true }' — the comma inside contains() is a
YAML flow-map separator, so 9 tests failed yamllint ('expected , or }'). Convert
those checks to block style (matching data-survival), where a comma in the key
scalar is fine. Gate PASS; data-survival still green.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <[email protected]>
Every chainsaw `check` used the regex operator `=~` (`($stdout =~ 'X'): true`),
which chainsaw's expression engine rejects ('SyntaxError: Unknown char: ~') — so
EVERY such test failed on the assertion even when the behavior passed. Proven with
data-survival (R-STATE-01): the Longhorn canary genuinely SURVIVED pod destruction
(DATA_SURVIVED_OK) but the test FAILED on the `=~` syntax. Converted all 10 tests to
JMESPath `contains($stdout, 'X')` (data-survival's alternation → contains||contains).
data-survival now PASSES; the other 9 (later-phase components) are syntactically fixed
for when their phases deploy.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <[email protected]>
jakman85
