The 39Gi/node Longhorn data disks at 1:1 over-provisioning can't fit the media stack
(plex 20Gi replica failed: 'insufficient storage'). Volumes are thin-provisioned config-only,
so 200% lets the full catalog fit without a disk resize; physical fill risk is low. Also
right-sized plex config (20Gi was excessive for metadata). Prod-grade path: grow the data
disks (WS-STORAGE follow-up).
Add catalog/ ServiceDefinitions for qbittorrent and jackett and their
rendered apps/ manifests, wired into apps/kustomization.yaml.
Both are VPN-class (egress: vpn -> egress-class=vpn pod label steered by the
CiliumEgressGatewayPolicy + host kill-switch, ADR-0015) and internal
forward-auth UIs (oauth2-proxy -> Keycloak, group media-users). Config on
3-replica Longhorn. qBittorrent's bulk downloads volume is DEFERRED pending
OQ-2 (non-provisioning bulk StorageClass stub), mirroring plex/arr.
Traces: R-NET-05/06 (VPN egress + kill-switch), R-IDP-02/06 (forward-auth),
R-STATE-02/03, R-OBS-01, R-UPD-01/03, R-GITOPS-02.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <[email protected]>
Add catalog/plex.yaml (kind: container) and its rendered apps/plex.yaml,
and wire apps/kustomization.yaml. Plex = docs/13 row 1, the catalog's
largest service; validates the public-exposure + config-on-Longhorn path.
- image plexinc/pms-docker (pinned recent stable tag), port 32400
- exposure: public at plex.home.keithjackson.dev; egress: internet
- auth: native (Plex accounts, not Keycloak — docs/13/15 exception)
- config PVC 20Gi on longhorn; off-cluster backup (daily-offcluster) as the
longhorn tier forbids reacquirable under L0 (R-STATE-03)
- observability up-SLI; update channel stable
Bulk media (R-STATE-04) deferred: the `bulk` StorageClass is a documented
stub (OQ-2 unresolved, NFS CSI not installed) so a bulk PVC would leave the
pod Pending. Media mount omitted; attach once bulk provisions.
Traces: R-GITOPS-02, R-NET-01/02/05, R-STATE-01/02/03, R-TLS/R-DNS,
R-OBS-01, R-UPD-01/03, R-IDP-02, R-PLAT-02.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <[email protected]>
Exposed apps got a default-deny NetworkPolicy with ingress: [] (deny all), so the
Cilium Gateway (Envoy, reserved identity `ingress`) could not reach the backend — an
Accepted HTTPRoute was still unreachable. render.py now emits an ADDITIVE, least-
privilege CiliumNetworkPolicy for any ServiceDefinition that renders an HTTPRoute:
ingress:
- fromEntities: [ingress] # the shared Cilium Gateway/Envoy proxy identity
toPorts: [<exposed service port(s)> TCP]
Verified against the live cluster (Cilium 1.16.5): with default-deny in place, Hubble
shows the Gateway proxy reaching pihole as source identity `(ingress)` and the flow
`Policy denied DROPPED` on :80 — so `fromEntities: [ingress]` is exactly the source the
Gateway uses, scoped to the service targetPort. Default-deny stays intact (ingress: []
unchanged); the allow only opens the north-south path (docs/09), east-west stays denied.
- render.py: add r_gateway_ingress_policy(); emit it after dependency policies; selftest
asserts the allow is additive (default-deny ingress stays []), least-privilege (only the
exposed port, only the ingress identity), and absent for non-exposed services.
- L1 goldens updated for the two exposed fixtures (container-workload, egress-class);
default-deny-baseline golden unchanged (no exposure). --selftest + run.sh --layer l1 green.
- apps/pihole.yaml re-rendered (--no-image-automation) to carry the allow.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <[email protected]>
First app onboarded through catalog/render.py -> apps/. Added --no-image-automation so apps
deploy before the Flux image controllers exist (L1 goldens keep the default, unchanged).
KNOWN GAP surfaced: exposed apps get default-deny (ingress: []) with no gateway-ingress allow,
so the HTTPRoute path is blocked — renderer/WS-NET follow-up to allow Cilium gateway ingress
to services with an exposure/HTTPRoute.
Phase 0 foundation shell (read-only spec at ../home-network-k3s). Top-level
tree + rules; workstream agents fill their subtrees on feature branches.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <[email protected]>
jakman85
