fix(gitea): admins could override the gate -- the enforcement was not enforcing

enable_status_check and required_approvals were set earlier today and recorded as done.
They did not bite. block_admin_merge_override was false, and Gitea lets repo admins
override merge requirements without it. jakman85 holds owner, so both requirements were
bypassable by exactly the account that performs every merge.

The evidence was already on the record: PRs #5-#9 all merged while required_approvals: 1
was in force, with ZERO approvals recorded on any of them.

Two process failures, both the same shape as the defect this whole session started with:

1. Verified with the wrong view. /branches/main reports protected, enable_status_check and
   required_approvals but NOT block_admin_merge_override -- it showed everything green while
   the rule was overridable. /branch_protections/main is authoritative.
2. Probed for a field name assumed to exist. This Gitea (1.24.3) has no `apply_to_admins`;
   asking jq for it returns null, which reads like "set to false" but means "key absent", so
   a PATCH that silently did nothing produced a convincing before/after. jq returning null
   is not a value -- it may be an absence. Enumerate with to_entries.

require-gate.sh now sets block_admin_merge_override: true; block-admin-override.sh fixes it
in isolation. Both carry the field-name warning.

This PR is the test. If it merges WITHOUT an approval, the fix did not work.

Also records the governance question: with only jakman85 (human) and gitea-admin (agent),
a human-authored PR now needs the automation account to approve it. That is ceremony, not
review, and the choice between keeping it, dropping approvals in favour of the status
check, or adding a second human is the operator's to make.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <[email protected]>

.gitea/workflows/README.md

@@ -40,9 +40,15 @@ and ADR-0011: **CI holds no broad kubeconfig.** L2/L3 run as an in-cluster **Cha
 *collects* its artifacts, using a narrow trigger credential referenced **by secret name only**
 (`secrets.CONFORMANCE_TRIGGER_KUBECONFIG`) — never a plaintext secret, never a cluster-admin kubeconfig.
 
-## Honest SKIP — never fake green (Phase 0)
+## Honest SKIP — never fake green
 
-**No cluster exists in Phase 0.** The gate is deliberately built so unavailable checks **SKIP loudly,
+**NOTE (2026-09-29):** this section is written in the past's voice — "Phase 0", "no cluster
+exists". **A cluster has existed for weeks** and Flux has been reconciling against it. The
+skip logic below is still correct and still honest, but read it as describing a **live
+coverage gap** (L2/L3 is not wired into CI) rather than an expected phase. Its being
+phrased as a phase is part of why the gap went unexamined.
+
+Originally: The gate is deliberately built so unavailable checks **SKIP loudly,
 they do not pass**:
 
 - The `conformance` job is `if: ${{ vars.CLUSTER_AVAILABLE == 'true' }}` — with no cluster it is
@@ -77,21 +83,29 @@ Both dirs are git-ignored (see [`.gitignore`](../../.gitignore)).
 ## Triggers & branch model (CONTRIBUTING.md)
 
 - `pull_request` → `main`: **PRs are the enforced merge gate into `main`.**
-- `push` → `feature/**`, `fix/**`, `docs/**`, `chore/**`: fast feedback on the branch. **No work on `main`.**
+- `push` → `main` only. The per-branch prefix list was removed: `act_runner` runs at capacity 1,
+  so a branch push fires a redundant run that serialises *ahead* of the PR run for the same tree.
+  **No work on `main`** — and since 2026-09-29 that is enforced, not conventional: `main` is a
+  protected branch and a direct push is rejected by the pre-receive hook (verified, not assumed).
 
-## Transition: generic-CI-now → Gitea-Actions-after-Gitea-is-up
+## Transition: COMPLETE (2026-09-29)
 
-Per [`CONTRIBUTING.md`](../../../home-network-k3s/CONTRIBUTING.md) and
-[`docs/05` §"local bootstrap → self-hosted Gitea"](../../../home-network-k3s/docs/05-gitops-and-delivery.md):
+This section used to describe a migration as pending. It has happened. Gitea is live at
+`gitea.home.keithjackson.dev`, the runner `incluster-dind` is registered and online, and
+`gate.yml` runs on every PR.
 
-1. **Now (interim):** there is **no remote git host** on this network. This workflow file is dormant —
-   but the **identical gate runs locally today** via `make -C ci gate` (R-TEST-02). Development is
-   local feature-branch → `main`, the gate enforced by convention + the local runner.
-2. **Gitea comes online early** (one of the first services onboarded) at `gitea.home.keithjackson.dev`.
-3. **CI moves to Gitea Actions:** this workflow activates unchanged. The only operational steps are
-   enabling a Gitea Actions runner and setting `vars.CLUSTER_AVAILABLE=true` +
-   `secrets.CONFORMANCE_TRIGGER_KUBECONFIG` once a dev/test cluster exists. PRs then become the
-   **platform-enforced** merge gate — the same no-work-in-main rule, now enforced by machine.
+**What took a month to notice:** the migration was recorded as done on 2026-08-31 without
+anyone checking the platform. In reality `main` had **no branch protection** and **zero
+runners were registered** until 2026-09-29. Every "the gate enforces this" statement in
+between rested on an assertion nobody verified. PR #1 — the first pull request this
+repository ever had — sat `pending` for 30.6 minutes because nothing existed to run it.
+
+So: **do not read this file, or the DECISIONS-LOG, as evidence about the live platform.**
+Query the API. `infra/gitea/` holds the scripts and the measured state.
+
+Still genuinely outstanding: `vars.CLUSTER_AVAILABLE` and
+`secrets.CONFORMANCE_TRIGGER_KUBECONFIG` are unset, so L2/L3 conformance does not run in
+CI. That is a real coverage gap, not a phase.
 
 ## Configuration (set in Gitea; referenced by name only)
 

.gitea/workflows/gate.yml

@@ -44,16 +44,31 @@
 ---
 name: gate
 
+# TRIGGERS — deliberately only `pull_request` into main, plus `push` to main itself.
+#
+# There is NO per-branch push trigger. There used to be a prefix list (feature/** fix/**
+# docs/** chore/**) for "fast feedback on the branch", and it was a net negative here:
+#
+#   * `act_runner` runs at capacity 1. A branch push and its PR fire the SAME gate over the
+#     SAME tree, and the redundant run SERIALISES AHEAD of the PR run — doubling the wall
+#     clock on the one result that actually gates the merge. That cost real time during the
+#     2026-09-29 plex claim, where the loop is racing a short-lived token.
+#   * The list silently did not match this repo's own convention. Branches here are `feat/**`,
+#     which was absent, so the "fast feedback" never fired for the most common prefix anyway —
+#     a mismatch nobody noticed for a month because its only symptom was a MISSING run.
+#     Any hand-maintained prefix list has that failure mode; deleting it removes the class.
+#   * It is redundant. CLAUDE.md already requires `./ci/gate.sh` in the pinned toolbox before
+#     you push (74s locally), and the PR gate re-runs it authoritatively. A third run of the
+#     same checks buys nothing.
+#
+# `push: [main]` is KEPT: post-merge main must still be verified, and it is the only run for
+# which no PR context exists.
 on:
   pull_request:
     branches: [main]
   push:
     branches:
       - main
-      - 'feature/**'
-      - 'fix/**'
-      - 'docs/**'
-      - 'chore/**'
 
 concurrency:
   group: gate-${{ github.ref }}

.gitea/workflows/merge-gate.yaml

@@ -11,11 +11,14 @@
 #                                          v
 #                                     merge-gate decision  [R-TEST-03: touched subset green]
 #
-# Transition (CONTRIBUTING.md / docs/05 §"local bootstrap -> self-hosted Gitea"):
-# Today there is no Gitea host, so this file is dormant. The SAME gate is runnable
-# now via `make -C ci gate` (R-TEST-02). Once Gitea is self-hosted and Gitea
-# Actions is enabled, this workflow becomes the ENFORCED PR merge gate into main —
-# no code change required, only turning on the runner and setting CLUSTER_AVAILABLE.
+# STATUS (corrected 2026-09-29): Gitea IS hosted and Gitea Actions IS enabled; the runner
+# `incluster-dind` is online and gate.yml is the live PR gate. The text that used to sit here
+# ("Today there is no Gitea host, so this file is dormant") was stale by weeks -- it was written
+# as a plan and never revisited once the plan completed.
+#
+# THIS file is still dormant, but for the reason in the DORMANT block below -- its spec checkout
+# and L2/L3 seams are unwired -- NOT because there is no host. Do not read a stale plan as a
+# statement about the live platform; query the API instead (see infra/gitea/).
 #
 # CI holds NO broad kubeconfig. L2/L3 run as an in-cluster Chainsaw Job whose own
 # scoped ServiceAccount holds cluster access (docs/14, R-SEC-02); CI uses only a

CLAUDE.md

@@ -23,28 +23,58 @@ There is no other path. Specifically:
 > (main is what the cluster follows), not what you are permitted to do. Honour this
 > file, not that line. Fixing those runbooks is tracked work.
 
-## 2. Enforcement is currently WEAKER than this rule. Follow the rule anyway.
+## 2. Enforcement (as of 2026-09-29: the rule is now MACHINE-ENFORCED)
 
 Verified against the live Gitea on 2026-09-29:
 
 | Expected | Actual |
 |---|---|
-| `main` protected, direct push rejected | **No branch protection.** `protected: false`, `user_can_push: true` |
-| PR blocked until the gate passes | **`enable_status_check: false`**, `status_check_contexts: []` |
-| Gate runs on every PR | **Fixed 2026-09-29.** Runner `incluster-dind` is online; `gate / gate (pull_request)` runs and passes in ~1m30s–2m |
-| Approval required before merge | **`required_approvals: 0`** |
+| `main` protected, direct push rejected | ✅ `protected: true`, `user_can_push: false` — **verified by a real rejected push**, not by the API's word |
+| PR blocked until the gate passes | ✅ `enable_status_check: true`, context `gate / gate (pull_request)` |
+| Gate runs on every PR | ✅ runner `incluster-dind` online; ~1m35s |
+| Approval required before merge | ✅ `required_approvals: 1` |
 
-So nothing mechanically stops you from pushing to `main` right now. **That is a gap
-being closed, not permission.** `DECISIONS-LOG.md` (2026-08-31) claimed the gate was a
-"required status check" with a runner online; neither was true, which is how this went
-unnoticed for a month. The runner half is now genuinely fixed and observed green. The
-protection half is not — see `infra/gitea/`.
+All four were FALSE as recently as 2026-09-29, while this repo's own log asserted they were
+true. They are true now because each was measured, and the push rejection was provoked rather
+than assumed. **Re-measure before relying on any of them** — see §2b.
+
+Still not covered: `vars.CLUSTER_AVAILABLE` is unset, so **L2/L3 conformance does not run in
+CI**. A green PR therefore proves the L0/L1 offline subset, not runtime behaviour.
 
 **Consequence for you:** CI now runs, but it does not yet *block* anything. Always run
 the toolbox gate yourself and quote its numbers. Never describe a PR as "green" on the
 strength of a check you have not seen report — and note that a **skipped** Gitea job
 reports as `success`, so a green tick is not by itself evidence that anything ran.
 
+## 2b. Never infer platform state from this repository
+
+**This repo is not evidence about the live platform.** Neither is `DECISIONS-LOG.md`.
+Both describe what someone believed at the time of writing, and both have been
+confidently wrong for a month at a stretch.
+
+On 2026-09-29 the log stated the merge gate was a required status check with a runner
+online. The API said `branch_protections: []` and **zero** runners. Everything downstream
+of that belief — "the gate enforces this", "your push would be rejected", "CI covers it" —
+was wrong, and nothing in the tree could have revealed it, because the tree was the source
+of the error.
+
+**So, before asserting that any gate, protection, runner, secret, or workload is in a
+given state: query the thing itself.**
+
+| Claim about... | Check |
+|---|---|
+| branch protection / required checks | `GET /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/branches/main` |
+| a runner exists | `GET /api/v1/admin/actions/runners` |
+| CI actually ran | the commit's `/statuses` — and read the **description**; a *skipped* Gitea job reports `success` with "Has been skipped" |
+| a workload / Secret / env | `kubectl --context k3s-prod ...` (read-only is fine for agents) |
+| Flux applied your commit | compare `.status.lastAppliedRevision` against the GitRepository's artifact revision |
+
+Quote the measured field, not the prose. If you cannot measure it, say so explicitly —
+"unverified" is a legitimate report, and a far better one than a confident guess that
+matches the docs.
+
+**A green tick is not proof anything ran.** Read what actually executed.
+
 ## 3. Gate before you push
 
     ./infra/devcontainer/dev.sh run bash -c './ci/gate.sh'

DECISIONS-LOG.md

@@ -1192,6 +1192,13 @@ fresh agent should read this entry + `infra/PHASE1-STATUS.md` + `docs/plans/` an
   Platform-admins require TOTP MFA.
 - **Gitea Actions CI is LIVE + enforcing**: `.gitea/workflows/gate.yml` runs `make -C ci gate` on push/PR to main;
   required status check; runner `incluster-dind` online (ns gitea-actions).
+  > **[CORRECTION, 2026-09-29 — THIS BULLET WAS FALSE WHEN WRITTEN AND STAYED FALSE FOR A MONTH.]**
+  > Measured against the live Gitea API on 2026-09-29: `branch_protections` returned `[]` (`main`
+  > `protected:false`, `enable_status_check:false`, `user_can_push:true`) and **zero** Actions runners
+  > were registered at repo, org or site level. The gate was neither enforced nor able to run. PR #1
+  > — the first pull request this repo ever had — was opened on 2026-09-29 and sat `pending` for
+  > 30.6 minutes with nothing to execute it. Both halves of this bullet were asserted, not verified.
+  > See the 2026-09-29 entries for the root cause and the fix.
 
 ### What changed this session (durable)
 1. **SSO cluster-wide break→fix — root cause Cilium CVE-2025-30162.** The 1.16→1.20 security fix makes the shared
@@ -4863,3 +4870,97 @@ That theory was mine and it was wrong: the pipeline was never too slow, it simpl
    FOLLOW-UP note in `apps/wave-1/gitea-actions.yaml`. It deletes both hand-rolled wait loops and
    the envsubst hazard. Land it ALONE — it is the merge gate for the whole repo.
 6. Create the Plex libraries over `/media/movies`, `/media/tv`, `/media/photos`.
+
+## 2026-09-29 (later) — the merge gate is now real, enforced, and proven. **PM HANDOFF.**
+
+Closes the gap opened by the earlier entry today. Eight PRs, all gated; every claim below was
+measured against the live API or cluster, not inferred from this repository.
+
+### Final state
+
+| | Verified |
+|---|---|
+| `main` protected | `protected:true`, `user_can_push:false` — and a direct push as site-admin `gitea-admin` was **provoked and rejected** (`pre-receive hook declined`) |
+| Gate required | `enable_status_check:true`, contexts `["gate / gate (pull_request)"]` |
+| Approvals | `required_approvals:1`; `jakman85` holds `owner` |
+| Runner | `incluster-dind` online, now a **native sidecar** (`initContainers`, `restartPolicy: Always`, TLS-verified `docker info` startupProbe) |
+| Gate time | ~1m35s |
+| Plex | claimed 2026-09-29; `PlexOnlineToken` present on the `plex-config` PVC |
+
+### What was corrected in the documentation
+
+`CLAUDE.md` §2b — *never infer platform state from this repository* — is the durable outcome.
+The 2026-08-31 entry asserting an enforced gate is now annotated **in place**. The "Phase 0 /
+no cluster exists" framing across `ci/`, `clusters/` and `conformance/` READMEs is banner-marked
+as describing a live gap rather than a stage. All 37 runbooks now describe the PR flow. Two
+`.sops.yaml` headers and `catalog/plex.yaml` were corrected (comment edits verified not to break
+the SOPS MAC, and not to move the rendered golden).
+
+### A claim of mine that shipped wrong, and is now corrected in place
+
+PR #7 stated the sidecar conversion would remove the one-per-start dockerd line
+`http: TLS handshake error from 127.0.0.1: EOF`. **It does not.** Exactly one still appears,
+immediately after `API listen on [::]:2376` — it is now the startupProbe's first attempt,
+landing microseconds after dockerd begins listening and cut off by `timeoutSeconds: 1`; the
+next poll succeeds. Cosmetic, and deliberately not chased: raising the timeout to hide one
+benign startup line would slow every subsequent poll. The manifest comment now says so.
+
+### The root cause nobody has fixed yet
+
+Gitea's repo settings live in its own database — invisible to Flux and unreadable by the
+conformance gate. **No check exists that could have caught "protection off, runner gone."**
+`infra/gitea/` declares and can re-assert the desired state, but it is not a detector. A
+conformance check that reads the live Gitea API and fails on divergence is the highest-value
+remaining work in this repo, and it is the difference between this having been fixed and this
+being unable to recur.
+
+### Next steps
+
+1. **Write that Gitea-settings conformance check.** Everything else here is a symptom.
+2. Wire `vars.CLUSTER_AVAILABLE` + `secrets.CONFORMANCE_TRIGGER_KUBECONFIG` so **L2/L3 runs in
+   CI**. A green PR currently proves the L0/L1 offline subset only — runtime behaviour is
+   unverified on every merge.
+3. Re-run `infra/gitea/verify-then-enforce.sh` after any future act-runner change.
+4. `required_approvals: 1` means a PR you open as `jakman85` needs `gitea-admin` to approve.
+   If that friction bites, either open agent work as `gitea-admin` and review as `jakman85`, or
+   drop back to relying on the status check alone.
+
+## 2026-09-29 (later still) — the enforcement we "turned on" was overridable by the account that merges
+
+`enable_status_check: true` and `required_approvals: 1` were set earlier today and recorded as
+done. **They did not bite.** `block_admin_merge_override` was `false`, and Gitea lets repository
+admins override merge requirements without it. `jakman85` holds `owner`, so both requirements
+were bypassable by exactly the account that performs every merge.
+
+**The evidence was already on the record and nobody read it:** PRs #5, #6, #7, #8 and #9 all
+merged while `required_approvals: 1` was in force, with **zero approvals recorded on any of
+them**. A one-line check (`/pulls/{n}/reviews`) would have shown it at any point.
+
+Two process failures, both mine, both the same shape as the original defect:
+
+1. **I verified with the wrong view.** `/branches/main` reports `protected`,
+   `enable_status_check` and `required_approvals` but NOT `block_admin_merge_override`. It
+   showed everything green while the rule was overridable. The authoritative object is
+   `/branch_protections/main` — read it and enumerate its keys.
+2. **I probed for a field name I assumed existed.** This Gitea (1.24.3) has no
+   `apply_to_admins`. Asking `jq` for it returns `null`, which reads exactly like "set to
+   false" but means "key absent" — so a PATCH that silently did nothing looked like a real
+   before/after. **`jq` returning null is not a value; it may be an absence.** Enumerate with
+   `to_entries`.
+
+Now `block_admin_merge_override: true`, applied and read back. `infra/gitea/require-gate.sh`
+sets it, and `infra/gitea/block-admin-override.sh` fixes it in isolation.
+
+**This is still only a setting.** It is proven when a green PR is REFUSED a merge until
+approved — and that has not been observed yet. This PR is the test: if it merges without an
+approval, the fix did not work and the finding stands.
+
+### The governance question this exposes
+
+There are two accounts: `jakman85` (owner, the human) and `gitea-admin` (the agent). With
+approvals now genuinely required, an agent-authored PR is approved by the human — which is the
+intent. But a PR authored by `jakman85` needs `gitea-admin` to approve it, i.e. the automation
+account rubber-stamping the human. That is ceremony, not review. Options: keep it and accept
+the ceremony; drop `required_approvals` to 0 and rely on the status check, which is the gate
+that actually verifies something; or add a second human account. **This is a decision for the
+operator, not a default to be chosen silently.**

apps/wave-0/plex-claim-secret.sops.yaml

@@ -7,12 +7,20 @@
 # substitution). A braced token quoted from the upstream shell script would be a live hazard here,
 # not prose, so the upstream conditions below are described in words.
 #
-# THE VALUE SHIPPED WITH THIS FILE IS A PLACEHOLDER, DELIBERATELY — the literal string
-# `replace-me-with-a-fresh-plex-tv-claim-token`, not a credential. A https://plex.tv/claim token has
-# a ~4-minute TTL, far shorter than commit -> push -> Flux reconcile -> pod-roll, so no token
-# committed here is ever still valid when the pod starts. This file exists to make the Secret — and
-# therefore the env reference — ALWAYS RESOLVABLE IN THE FLUX GRAPH, not to carry a working token.
-# The real token is injected by the operator inside that 4-minute window: runbooks/plex-claim.md.
+# THIS FILE NO LONGER HOLDS THE PLACEHOLDER. Corrected 2026-09-29: the server was CLAIMED on that
+# date, and the value here is the SPENT token from that claim. It is inert and safe to leave --
+# upstream gates the exchange on PlexOnlineToken being ABSENT from /config, and it is now present on
+# the plex-config PVC, so this value is a NO-OP on every start whatever it holds. Deleting the Secret
+# would NOT be safe (see below), which is why a spent token stays here rather than being blanked.
+#
+# The claim token is SHORT-LIVED -- minutes. Read the countdown that plex.tv/claim renders when it
+# issues one; do NOT budget against a number written in this tree. Earlier revisions of this comment
+# asserted a "~4-minute TTL" as established fact with no citation, and upstream plexinc/pms-docker
+# documents no expiry at all. That uncited number was load-bearing for the whole procedure design.
+#
+# This file exists to make the Secret — and therefore the env reference — ALWAYS RESOLVABLE IN THE
+# FLUX GRAPH, not to carry a working token. Re-claiming (only needed after a /config wipe) is
+# scripted: infra/plex/claim-ship.sh, measured at ~2m45s end to end.
 #
 # WHY SHIPPING A PLACEHOLDER IS SAFE (verified against plexinc/pms-docker branch `master`, the
 # s6-overlay v2 script root/etc/cont-init.d/40-plex-first-run, cross-checked byte-identical against

apps/wave-1/gitea-actions-runner-secret.sops.yaml

@@ -4,7 +4,13 @@
 # against Gitea. Flux decrypts it via the sops-age key at reconcile (apps Kustomization
 # decryption is wired in clusters/dev/kustomization.yaml). Rotate by resetting the token
 # in Gitea (admin -> actions -> runners) and re-encrypting a fresh value here.
-# Recover/inspect: infra/devcontainer/dev.sh run sops -d apps/gitea-actions-runner-secret.sops.yaml
+# ROTATE: ./infra/gitea/runner-token-rotate.sh -- it mints a fresh instance-level token from the
+# Gitea API and writes it here via `sops set`, without the value ever being printed.
+# Do NOT `sops -d` this file into a terminal, a log, or an agent transcript. To check only that
+# it still decrypts, redirect: `sops -d <file> > /dev/null`.
+# NOTE: a fresh token alone may not re-register the runner. act_runner registers ONCE and keeps
+# its identity in /data/.runner on the act-runner-data PVC; if Gitea no longer holds a matching
+# row it skips registration silently. Clearing that PVC is what forces a real re-registration.
 apiVersion: v1
 kind: Secret
 metadata:

apps/wave-1/gitea-actions.yaml

@@ -99,70 +99,79 @@ spec:
       # CI holds no cluster credentials — do not mount a SA token into the runner or
       # (via the shared netns) the job containers (R-SEC-02, docs/14).
       automountServiceAccountToken: false
+      # ---- Docker-in-Docker: the job executor daemon (privileged) -------------------
+      #
+      # NATIVE SIDECAR (k3s v1.36; sidecar containers are GA). It is an initContainer with
+      # `restartPolicy: Always`, which means: it starts BEFORE the regular containers, keeps
+      # running alongside them, and is terminated after them. kubelet holds `runner` until
+      # this container's startupProbe passes, so the ordering is enforced by the kubelet
+      # instead of hand-rolled shell in the runner.
+      #
+      # This REPLACES two bounded wait-loops that used to live in the runner's `command:`.
+      # Deleting them also deletes an envsubst hazard: clusters/base/apps-wave-1.yaml runs
+      # postBuild substitution over this ENTIRE manifest, comments included, and those loops
+      # depended on bare dollar-names surviving it untouched. There is now no shell here at
+      # all, so there is nothing to escape or mis-escape.
+      #
+      # WHY THE PROBE IS `exec docker ... info` AND NOT `tcpSocket`. A tcpSocket probe would
+      # re-open the exact gap the old Stage 1 existed to close: dockerd writes the TLS certs
+      # and only THEN begins listening, so the port can accept a connection while the certs
+      # are absent or incomplete -- and act_runner hard-exits on a missing
+      # /certs/client/ca.pem. A full TLS-verified `docker info` proves BOTH that the certs
+      # are usable and that the daemon answers.
+      #
+      # CORRECTION (measured 2026-09-29, after this conversion shipped): the commit that
+      # introduced this claimed the conversion would REMOVE the one-per-start dockerd line
+      # `http: TLS handshake error from 127.0.0.1: EOF`. IT DOES NOT. Exactly one still
+      # appears, immediately after "API listen on [::]:2376" -- it is now this probe's FIRST
+      # attempt, landing microseconds after dockerd begins listening and cut off by
+      # timeoutSeconds: 1. The next poll succeeds. It is cosmetic, exactly as cosmetic as it
+      # was before, and deliberately NOT chased: raising timeoutSeconds to hide one benign
+      # startup line would slow every subsequent poll. Left documented rather than silenced.
+      #
+      # periodSeconds 1 x failureThreshold 60 preserves the previous 60s cap.
+      initContainers:
+        - name: dind
+          restartPolicy: Always   # <- this field is what makes it a SIDECAR
+          image: docker:27-dind
+          securityContext:
+            privileged: true
+          env:
+            # Generate + publish TLS certs into the shared emptyDir; dockerd then listens
+            # on tcp://0.0.0.0:2376 (TLS) which the runner reaches at localhost:2376.
+            - name: DOCKER_TLS_CERTDIR
+              value: /certs
+          volumeMounts:
+            - name: certs
+              mountPath: /certs
+            - name: dind-storage
+              mountPath: /var/lib/docker
+          resources:
+            requests:
+              cpu: 100m
+              memory: 256Mi
+            limits:
+              memory: 2Gi
+          startupProbe:
+            exec:
+              command:
+                - docker
+                - --host=tcp://127.0.0.1:2376
+                - --tlsverify
+                - --tlscacert=/certs/client/ca.pem
+                - --tlscert=/certs/client/cert.pem
+                - --tlskey=/certs/client/key.pem
+                - info
+            periodSeconds: 1
+            failureThreshold: 60
       containers:
         # ---- act_runner: registers with Gitea, dispatches jobs to the DinD daemon ----
         - name: runner
           image: gitea/act_runner:0.2.11
-          # TWO-STAGE BOUNDED WAIT on the DinD sidecar, then exec the image's normal
-          # entrypoint (/sbin/tini -- /opt/act/run.sh), which registers-from-env on first
-          # boot and runs `act_runner daemon`.
-          #
-          # STAGE 1 — the certs must EXIST: act_runner reads /certs/client/ca.pem at startup
-          #   and hard-exits if it is missing (a startup race against the sidecar).
-          # STAGE 2 — the daemon must actually ACCEPT a connection: the cert FILE appearing is
-          #   necessary but NOT sufficient. dockerd writes the certs and only THEN begins
-          #   listening on :2376, so a runner that proceeds on the file alone still hard-exits
-          #   with "cannot ping the docker daemon at tcp://localhost:2376" — observed
-          #   crashlooping 11 times in ~8 minutes on a fresh pod after a node bounce.
-          # Both loops are bounded (60 x 1s) and exit 1 on timeout, so a genuinely dead sidecar
-          # surfaces as a CrashLoopBackOff with a clear message instead of hanging forever.
-          #
-          # ENVSUBST SAFETY — the BARE $i / $j below are CORRECT. Do not "tidy" them into the
-          #   braced form or the double-dollar form; both are wrong here, for different reasons.
-          #   clusters/base/apps-wave-1.yaml carries postBuild.substituteFrom cluster-vars, so
-          #   Flux envsubst runs over this ENTIRE manifest — YAML comments very much included.
-          #   Its contract (drone/envsubst; the same one spelled out in clusters/base/apps-vms.yaml,
-          #   and re-verified against this exact file with `flux envsubst`, flux v2.4.0) is:
-          #     - A bare  $name  is NOT a reference to envsubst: it passes through untouched, and
-          #       that holds even when the name IS set in cluster-vars. So $i and $j reach the
-          #       cluster verbatim and both 60s bounds below are real, enforced bounds.
-          #     - $((i + 1))  is likewise untouched: "(" cannot begin a variable name.
-          #     - A BRACED dollar-name IS a reference and gets replaced — with the empty string
-          #       when the name is unset. One of those here would make a bound read [ "" -ge 60 ],
-          #       which errors, short-circuits the &&, and silently turns the wait UNBOUNDED.
-          #     - A DOUBLE-dollar braced name is envsubst's escape and survives as the braced
-          #       form — still wrong for us, because on any path where envsubst does NOT run
-          #       (a plain `kustomize build` or `kubectl apply -k` of this directory) the shell
-          #       reads that leading double-dollar as its own PID, so a bound would compare a
-          #       string like 1234{i} against 60. The bare form is the only spelling that is
-          #       correct on BOTH paths.
-          #     - A braced name containing punctuation is a HARD ERROR ("unable to parse variable
-          #       name") that fails this whole Kustomization — and this Kustomization gates every
-          #       merge in the repo. So never write one anywhere in this file, INCLUDING in a
-          #       comment. That is why this note names the three forms in words rather than
-          #       showing them: an earlier draft of it spelled them out literally and broke
-          #       `flux envsubst` on the file. (Same trap the indexed-expansion warning in
-          #       clusters/base/apps-vms.yaml describes.)
-          command:
-            - /bin/sh
-            - -c
-            - |
-              # Stage 1: the sidecar's TLS client certs must appear in the shared emptyDir.
-              i=0
-              until [ -f /certs/client/ca.pem ]; do
-                i=$((i + 1))
-                [ "$i" -ge 60 ] && { echo "dind certs never appeared" >&2; exit 1; }
-                echo "waiting for dind TLS certs ($i)"; sleep 1
-              done
-              # Stage 2: dockerd must actually accept a connection on :2376. busybox nc in this
-              # Alpine-based image (gitea/act_runner:0.2.11) supports -z (scan) and -w (timeout).
-              j=0
-              until nc -z -w1 127.0.0.1 2376; do
-                j=$((j + 1))
-                [ "$j" -ge 60 ] && { echo "dind daemon never accepted a connection on 2376" >&2; exit 1; }
-                echo "waiting for dind daemon on :2376 ($j)"; sleep 1
-              done
-              exec /sbin/tini -- /opt/act/run.sh
+          # No `command:` override. The image's own entrypoint (/sbin/tini -- /opt/act/run.sh)
+          # registers from env on first boot and runs `act_runner daemon`. The two wait-loops
+          # that used to live here are gone: kubelet now holds this container until the dind
+          # sidecar's startupProbe passes (see initContainers above).
           env:
             - name: GITEA_INSTANCE_URL
               value: https://gitea.${BASE_DOMAIN}
@@ -198,52 +207,6 @@ spec:
               memory: 128Mi
             limits:
               memory: 512Mi
-        # ---- Docker-in-Docker: the job executor daemon (privileged) ----
-        #
-        # FOLLOW-UP (deliberately NOT bundled into the readiness fix above — own change):
-        #   Convert this container into a NATIVE SIDECAR and delete both shell wait-loops.
-        #   k3s is now v1.36, where sidecar containers are GA, so kubelet can enforce the
-        #   ordering that the loops above hand-roll — which also removes the envsubst hazard
-        #   from this file entirely (no shell, no $i/$j, nothing to escape or mis-escape).
-        #   Shape to build:
-        #     1. Move this whole container into `initContainers:` as the FIRST entry.
-        #     2. Add `restartPolicy: Always` to it. That single field is what makes an
-        #        initContainer a sidecar: it starts before the regular containers, keeps
-        #        running alongside them, and is terminated after them.
-        #     3. Give it a `startupProbe` that succeeds only when dockerd accepts a TLS
-        #        connection — e.g. `exec` a `docker -H tcp://127.0.0.1:2376 --tlsverify
-        #        --tlscacert /certs/client/ca.pem --tlscert /certs/client/cert.pem
-        #        --tlskey /certs/client/key.pem info`. Do NOT use a bare `tcpSocket` probe:
-        #        it would re-open the same "port accepting but TLS/certs not ready" gap that
-        #        Stage 1 above exists to close. `periodSeconds: 1` + `failureThreshold: 60`
-        #        preserves today's 60s cap.
-        #     4. kubelet then holds the `runner` container until that startupProbe passes, so
-        #        `runner` can drop its `command:` override completely and run the image's
-        #        default entrypoint.
-        #   Why it is a separate change: this Deployment is the ENFORCED MERGE GATE for this
-        #   entire repository. If the conversion is wrong, nothing can merge — so it must land
-        #   alone, where the failure is unambiguous and not entangled with anything else, and
-        #   only after a real workflow run has been observed green on the converted pod.
-        - name: dind
-          image: docker:27-dind
-          securityContext:
-            privileged: true
-          env:
-            # Generate + publish TLS certs into the shared emptyDir; dockerd then listens
-            # on tcp://0.0.0.0:2376 (TLS) which the runner reaches at localhost:2376.
-            - name: DOCKER_TLS_CERTDIR
-              value: /certs
-          volumeMounts:
-            - name: certs
-              mountPath: /certs
-            - name: dind-storage
-              mountPath: /var/lib/docker
-          resources:
-            requests:
-              cpu: 100m
-              memory: 256Mi
-            limits:
-              memory: 2Gi
       volumes:
         - name: data
           persistentVolumeClaim:

catalog/plex.yaml

@@ -38,11 +38,17 @@ env:
   # UNCLAIMED, so this is wired; it was previously left out on the reasoning below, and only one
   # half of that reasoning survived contact with the upstream source.
   #
-  # THE 4-MINUTE TTL IS STILL TRUE, and it is now the OPERATIONAL constraint rather than a reason to
-  # abstain. A https://plex.tv/claim token expires in ~4 minutes — far shorter than commit -> push ->
-  # Flux reconcile -> pod-roll if that cycle is left to its own timers. So the committed value is a
-  # documented PLACEHOLDER and the live token is injected by the operator inside that window, with an
-  # explicit `flux reconcile` to collapse the wait: runbooks/plex-claim.md is the timed procedure.
+  # A SHORT TTL IS THE OPERATIONAL CONSTRAINT, not a reason to abstain. A https://plex.tv/claim token
+  # expires in MINUTES — read the countdown the claim page renders; do not budget against a number
+  # written in this tree. (This comment previously asserted "~4 minutes" as established fact. It was
+  # UNCITED, upstream plexinc/pms-docker documents no expiry at all, and that number was load-bearing
+  # for the whole procedure design — including a since-disproven claim that the delivery pipeline was
+  # too slow to fit inside it. Measured 2026-09-29: the full loop is ~2m45s and fits.)
+  #
+  # The live token is injected by the operator inside that window, with an explicit `flux reconcile`
+  # to collapse the wait. Scripted end to end as infra/plex/claim-ship.sh; runbooks/plex-claim.md is
+  # the procedure. SERVER CLAIMED 2026-09-29 — this env is now a permanent no-op (see below), and the
+  # committed value is the spent token from that claim rather than the original placeholder.
   #
   # ONE-SHOT, AND SAFE TO SIT HERE EXPIRED. Verified from plexinc/pms-docker's own first-run script
   # (branch `master`, root/etc/cont-init.d/40-plex-first-run, confirmed byte-identical to the file in

ci/README.md

@@ -1,5 +1,19 @@
 # `ci/` — portable merge gate (runnable today, without Gitea)
 
+> **STATUS NOTE (2026-09-29) — read before trusting the "Phase 0" framing below.**
+> This document speaks as though no cluster exists and the platform is scaffolding. **A
+> three-node k3s cluster has existed for weeks** and Flux has been reconciling against it.
+> Gitea is live, the Actions runner `incluster-dind` is online, and `main` is a protected
+> branch. Where the text says "Phase 0", "stub", or "no cluster exists", read it as
+> describing a **live gap** rather than an expected stage — most importantly, L2/L3
+> conformance still does not run in CI (`vars.CLUSTER_AVAILABLE` is unset), which is a real
+> coverage hole, not a phase.
+>
+> This mismatch is not cosmetic. A month of "the gate enforces this" claims rested on
+> documentation rather than measurement, and `main` was unprotected with zero runners
+> registered the whole time. **Query the live API before asserting platform state.**
+
+
 **Task T-0.2 · R-TEST-02 (reproducible, single-command) · Owner WS-GITOPS (CI).**
 
 The same merge gate the Gitea Actions workflow runs

clusters/README.md

@@ -1,5 +1,19 @@
 # clusters/
 
+> **STATUS NOTE (2026-09-29) — read before trusting the "Phase 0" framing below.**
+> This document speaks as though no cluster exists and the platform is scaffolding. **A
+> three-node k3s cluster has existed for weeks** and Flux has been reconciling against it.
+> Gitea is live, the Actions runner `incluster-dind` is online, and `main` is a protected
+> branch. Where the text says "Phase 0", "stub", or "no cluster exists", read it as
+> describing a **live gap** rather than an expected stage — most importantly, L2/L3
+> conformance still does not run in CI (`vars.CLUSTER_AVAILABLE` is unset), which is a real
+> coverage hole, not a phase.
+>
+> This mismatch is not cosmetic. A month of "the gate enforces this" claims rested on
+> documentation rather than measurement, and `main` was unprotected with zero runners
+> registered the whole time. **Query the live API before asserting platform state.**
+
+
 Flux entrypoints and the environment-overlay model (**R-ENV-02**, **R-GITOPS-01/02/03**).
 
 Governing spec: [`docs/05-gitops-and-delivery.md`](../../home-network-k3s/docs/05-gitops-and-delivery.md),

conformance/README.md

@@ -1,5 +1,19 @@
 # conformance/ — the home-k3s conformance harness (WS-TEST)
 
+> **STATUS NOTE (2026-09-29) — read before trusting the "Phase 0" framing below.**
+> This document speaks as though no cluster exists and the platform is scaffolding. **A
+> three-node k3s cluster has existed for weeks** and Flux has been reconciling against it.
+> Gitea is live, the Actions runner `incluster-dind` is online, and `main` is a protected
+> branch. Where the text says "Phase 0", "stub", or "no cluster exists", read it as
+> describing a **live gap** rather than an expected stage — most importantly, L2/L3
+> conformance still does not run in CI (`vars.CLUSTER_AVAILABLE` is unset), which is a real
+> coverage hole, not a phase.
+>
+> This mismatch is not cosmetic. A month of "the gate enforces this" claims rested on
+> documentation rather than measurement, and `main` was unprotected with zero runners
+> registered the whole time. **Query the live API before asserting platform state.**
+
+
 This subtree is the **definition of "done"** for the whole platform. Nothing is accepted
 on a demo, a screenshot, or "it reconciled": every requirement is proven by an
 **automated, reproducible, behavior-based test** tagged with the requirement ID(s) it

conformance/incluster/README.md

@@ -1,5 +1,19 @@
 # In-cluster conformance Job (L2/L3)
 
+> **STATUS NOTE (2026-09-29) — read before trusting the "Phase 0" framing below.**
+> This document speaks as though no cluster exists and the platform is scaffolding. **A
+> three-node k3s cluster has existed for weeks** and Flux has been reconciling against it.
+> Gitea is live, the Actions runner `incluster-dind` is online, and `main` is a protected
+> branch. Where the text says "Phase 0", "stub", or "no cluster exists", read it as
+> describing a **live gap** rather than an expected stage — most importantly, L2/L3
+> conformance still does not run in CI (`vars.CLUSTER_AVAILABLE` is unset), which is a real
+> coverage hole, not a phase.
+>
+> This mismatch is not cosmetic. A month of "the gate enforces this" claims rested on
+> documentation rather than measurement, and `main` was unprotected with zero runners
+> registered the whole time. **Query the live API before asserting platform state.**
+
+
 Per **ADR-0011** and **docs/14 "Where each layer runs"**: L0/L1 run in CI without a
 cluster, but **L2 behavioral and L3 fault-injection run as an in-cluster Chainsaw Job**
 on the dev/test cluster that **CI triggers and waits for**. CI holds **no** cluster

infra/gitea/README.md

@@ -43,7 +43,65 @@ list. That is precisely the observed symptom: zero runners, pod running, no erro
 looks at. Clearing the PVC is what forces a real re-registration; the script prints the
 commands.
 
-## Sequence — order matters
+## Sequence — DONE 2026-09-29
+
+All four steps are complete and each was verified, not assumed:
+
+| Step | State |
+|---|---|
+| 1. Runner registered | ✅ `incluster-dind` online. Root cause of its absence was a stale `/data/.runner` identity; clearing the PVC forced re-registration |
+| 2. Gate observed green on a real PR | ✅ `gate / gate (pull_request)` ~1m35s |
+| 3. `enable_status_check: true` | ✅ context `gate / gate (pull_request)` — that one ONLY |
+| 4. Collaborator + approvals | ✅ `jakman85` is owner; `required_approvals: 1` |
+
+Direct push to `main` was **provoked and rejected** (`pre-receive hook declined`) as
+`gitea-admin`, a site admin — so push protection is not merely declared, it holds for the
+account agents authenticate as.
+
+### 5. Block the admin override — the step the first pass MISSED
+
+`enable_status_check` and `required_approvals` were set on 2026-09-29 and **still did not
+bite**, because `block_admin_merge_override` was `false`. Gitea lets repo admins override
+merge requirements without it, and `jakman85` holds `owner` — so the two settings that looked
+like the gate were overridable by precisely the account that merges.
+
+**The evidence was sitting in plain sight:** PRs #5 through #9 all merged with
+`required_approvals: 1` in force and **zero approvals recorded on any of them**. Checking the
+*branch* view (`/branches/main`) hid this — it does not expose the field. Read the rule object
+(`/branch_protections/main`) and enumerate its keys.
+
+> **Do not probe for field names you assume exist.** This Gitea (1.24.3) has no
+> `apply_to_admins`; asking `jq` for it returns `null`, which reads like "set to false" but
+> means "key absent". Enumerate with `to_entries` and act on what is really there.
+
+Now `block_admin_merge_override: true`. **That is still only a setting, not evidence** — it is
+proven when a green PR is REFUSED a merge until approved, and not before.
+
+### `require-gate.sh` / `verify-then-enforce.sh`
+
+`verify-then-enforce.sh` is the re-runnable form of the whole safe order. It merges nothing —
+merging is a human's reviewed act — but it forces the Flux reconcile and then **aborts** unless
+the runner pod is healthy, a runner is online, and a real workflow goes green on it, before
+enabling enforcement and probing the push. `require-gate.sh` is the enforcement step alone.
+
+Re-run `verify-then-enforce.sh` after any future change to the act-runner Deployment.
+
+### Why these scripts exist at all, and what is still missing
+
+Gitea's repo settings live in **its own database**, not in anything Flux reconciles or the
+conformance gate can read. Nothing detects drift from what this directory declares. That is
+the root cause of the entire 2026-09-29 session: branch protection was off and the runner was
+gone for a month while the log recorded both as working, and **no check existed that could
+have caught it.**
+
+These scripts encode the desired state and can re-assert it, but they are not a detector. The
+durable fix is a conformance check that reads the live Gitea API and fails when it diverges
+from what is declared here — turning a class of silent, invisible failure into a loud one.
+**That check does not exist yet and is the highest-value remaining work in this directory.**
+
+## Historical sequence (kept for context)
+
+### Original ordering notes
 
 1. **Get an Actions runner registered** — `runner-token-rotate.sh`, then clear the PVC so
    the runner actually re-registers, then confirm it shows `online` in the API. Do not

infra/gitea/block-admin-override.sh

@@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
+#!/usr/bin/env bash
+# Stop repository admins from overriding the merge requirements on `main`.
+#
+# WHY. Gitea lets repo admins override branch-protection merge requirements unless
+# `block_admin_merge_override` is set. It was FALSE, and jakman85 holds `owner` -- so
+# required_approvals and the required status check were both overridable by the one account
+# that actually merges. Evidence: PRs #5-#9 all merged with ZERO approvals recorded against
+# `required_approvals: 1`.
+#
+# NOTE ON FIELD NAMES: this Gitea (1.24.3) has NO `apply_to_admins` field. Querying it with jq
+# returns null, which reads like "set to false" but actually means "key absent". Enumerate the
+# real keys (`to_entries`) rather than probing names you assume exist.
+#
+# Recoverable: an owner can PATCH this back to false if it gets in the way.
+set -euo pipefail
+HOST=gitea.home.keithjackson.dev; OWNER=Home-Network; REPO=home-network-k3s-impl
+creds="$(printf 'protocol=https\nhost=%s\n\n' "$HOST" | git credential fill)"
+U="$(sed -n 's/^username=//p' <<<"$creds")"; P="$(sed -n 's/^password=//p' <<<"$creds")"
+api() { curl -sS --config <(printf 'user = "%s:%s"\n' "$U" "$P") "$@"; }
+B="https://${HOST}/api/v1/repos/${OWNER}/${REPO}/branch_protections/main"
+
+echo "==> before: block_admin_merge_override = $(api "$B" | jq -r .block_admin_merge_override)"
+api -X PATCH -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
+  -d '{"block_admin_merge_override": true}' "$B" >/dev/null
+AFTER=$(api "$B" | jq -r .block_admin_merge_override)
+echo "==> after:  block_admin_merge_override = $AFTER"
+[ "$AFTER" = true ] || { echo "PATCH did not take -- do not record this as enforced." >&2; exit 1; }
+
+api "$B" | jq -r '{enable_push,enable_status_check,status_check_contexts,required_approvals,block_admin_merge_override}'
+cat <<'NOTE'
+
+NOW PROVE IT -- the setting is not the evidence. On the next PR:
+  * let the gate go green, then try to merge WITHOUT approving it.
+  * Gitea must REFUSE. If it merges, this still is not doing its job.
+Do not record approvals as enforced until you have seen a merge refused.
+NOTE

infra/gitea/require-gate.sh

@@ -0,0 +1,60 @@
+#!/usr/bin/env bash
+# Items 1 + 2: make the gate a REQUIRED status check and require one approval.
+#
+# RUN THIS LAST. Prerequisites, in order:
+#   a) PR #7 (dind native sidecar) is MERGED, and
+#   b) you have SEEN a real workflow run go green on the converted pod.
+# The runner Deployment is the merge gate for the whole repo. Turning on a required check
+# while the runner is broken means no PR can merge -- including the revert. (Recoverable:
+# an owner can set enable_status_check back to false. But do not rely on that.)
+#
+# Requires exactly ONE context: `gate / gate (pull_request)`.
+#   * NOT `gate / conformance (*)` -- that job is `if: false`, and a skipped Gitea job reports
+#     SUCCESS ("Has been skipped"). Requiring it would pass VACUOUSLY forever while nothing
+#     ran, which under HARD RULE 4 is worse than a deadlock: a deadlock is loud.
+# block_admin_merge_override: true is LOAD-BEARING and was missing on the first pass. Gitea
+# lets repo admins override merge requirements without it, so required_approvals and the
+# required status check are both bypassable by exactly the account that does the merging.
+# Measured: PRs #5-#9 merged with ZERO approvals recorded against required_approvals: 1.
+#
+# FIELD NAMES: this Gitea (1.24.3) has NO `apply_to_admins`. Asking jq for it returns null,
+# which reads like "false" but means "key absent" -- enumerate real keys with `to_entries`
+# instead of probing names you assume exist. That mistake cost a wasted PATCH.
+#
+#   * NOT the `(push)` variant -- after PR #6 there are no per-branch push runs at all, so a
+#     PR would never produce that context.
+set -euo pipefail
+HOST=gitea.home.keithjackson.dev; OWNER=Home-Network; REPO=home-network-k3s-impl
+creds="$(printf 'protocol=https\nhost=%s\n\n' "$HOST" | git credential fill)"
+U="$(sed -n 's/^username=//p' <<<"$creds")"; P="$(sed -n 's/^password=//p' <<<"$creds")"
+api() { curl -sS --config <(printf 'user = "%s:%s"\n' "$U" "$P") "$@"; }
+
+echo "==> updating branch protection on main"
+jq -n '{
+  enable_push: false,
+  enable_status_check: true,
+  status_check_contexts: ["gate / gate (pull_request)"],
+  required_approvals: 1,
+  block_on_rejected_reviews: true,
+  dismiss_stale_approvals: true,
+  block_on_outdated_branch: false,
+  block_admin_merge_override: true
+}' | api -X PATCH -H 'Content-Type: application/json' --data @- \
+  "https://${HOST}/api/v1/repos/${OWNER}/${REPO}/branch_protections/main" >/dev/null
+
+echo "==> verifying"
+api "https://${HOST}/api/v1/repos/${OWNER}/${REPO}/branches/main" \
+ | jq -r '{protected,user_can_push,enable_status_check,status_check_contexts,required_approvals}'
+
+cat <<'NOTE'
+
+NOTE ON required_approvals: 1 -- Gitea will not let an author approve their own PR.
+  * Agent-opened PRs (author gitea-admin) are approved by jakman85. Fine.
+  * PRs YOU open as jakman85 need gitea-admin to approve. If that is awkward, either open
+    agent work as gitea-admin and review as jakman85, or set required_approvals back to 0
+    and rely on the status check alone.
+
+Then prove it, rather than trusting the API:
+  git commit --allow-empty -m probe && git push origin main   # EXPECT: rejected
+  git reset --hard HEAD~1
+NOTE

infra/gitea/verify-then-enforce.sh

@@ -0,0 +1,83 @@
+#!/usr/bin/env bash
+# verify-then-enforce.sh — run this AFTER you have merged PRs 8, 5, 6, 7 in that order.
+#
+# It does NOT merge anything. Merging is your reviewed act (CLAUDE.md: a human approves and
+# merges). This script does the mechanical half: prove the converted runner actually works,
+# and only then turn on enforcement.
+#
+# WHY THIS ORDER. The act-runner Deployment IS the merge gate for this repository. Enabling a
+# required status check while the runner is broken means NO PR can merge -- including the
+# revert. So PR #7 lands while the gate is still advisory, is PROVEN green on a real run, and
+# only then does enforcement go on.
+#
+# Aborts at the first checkpoint that does not pass. Safe to re-run.
+set -euo pipefail
+HOST=gitea.home.keithjackson.dev; OWNER=Home-Network; REPO=home-network-k3s-impl
+REPO_ROOT=/var/home/keith/source/home-network-k3s-impl
+D="$(cd "$(dirname "${BASH_SOURCE[0]}")" && pwd)"
+cd "$REPO_ROOT"
+creds="$(printf 'protocol=https\nhost=%s\n\n' "$HOST" | git credential fill)"
+U="$(sed -n 's/^username=//p' <<<"$creds")"; P="$(sed -n 's/^password=//p' <<<"$creds")"
+api() { curl -sS --config <(printf 'user = "%s:%s"\n' "$U" "$P") "$@"; }
+A="https://${HOST}/api/v1/repos/${OWNER}/${REPO}"
+say() { printf '\n\033[1m==> %s\033[0m\n' "$1"; }
+die() { printf '\n\033[31mABORT: %s\033[0m\n' "$1" >&2; exit 1; }
+
+say "PRECHECK — all four PRs must be merged first"
+for n in 8 5 6 7; do
+  m=$(api "$A/pulls/$n" | jq -r .merged)
+  printf '  PR #%s merged=%s\n' "$n" "$m"
+  [ "$m" = true ] || die "PR #$n is not merged yet. Merge 8, 5, 6, 7 in that order, then re-run."
+done
+
+say "STEP 1 — force Flux to apply the sidecar now, not on the 10m interval"
+./infra/devcontainer/dev.sh run bash -c \
+  'flux --context k3s-prod -n flux-system reconcile kustomization apps-wave-1 --with-source'
+
+say "STEP 2 — CHECKPOINT: the converted pod must come up healthy"
+./infra/devcontainer/dev.sh run bash -c '
+  kubectl --context k3s-prod -n gitea-actions rollout status deploy/act-runner --timeout=180s
+  echo "--- sidecar (initContainers) ---"
+  kubectl --context k3s-prod -n gitea-actions get deploy act-runner \
+    -o jsonpath="{range .spec.template.spec.initContainers[*]}{.name} restartPolicy={.restartPolicy}{\"\n\"}{end}"
+  kubectl --context k3s-prod -n gitea-actions get pod -l app.kubernetes.io/name=act-runner' \
+  || die "converted act-runner pod is not healthy -- REVERT PR #7 before anything else"
+
+say "STEP 3 — CHECKPOINT: a runner must be ONLINE again"
+n=0
+for i in $(seq 1 40); do
+  n=$(api "https://${HOST}/api/v1/admin/actions/runners" | jq -r '[(.runners//[])[]|select(.status=="online")]|length')
+  printf '\r  online runners: %s  (%ss)   ' "$n" "$((i*5))"
+  [ "${n:-0}" -ge 1 ] && { echo; break; }
+  sleep 5
+done
+[ "${n:-0}" -ge 1 ] || die "no runner online after the conversion -- REVERT PR #7"
+
+say "STEP 4 — CHECKPOINT: a REAL workflow must go green ON THE CONVERTED POD"
+MAIN_SHA=$(api "$A/branches/main" | jq -r .commit.id)
+echo "  watching the post-merge push run on main (${MAIN_SHA:0:8})..."
+st=""
+for i in $(seq 1 60); do
+  st=$(api "$A/commits/$MAIN_SHA/status" | jq -r .state)
+  printf '\r  main gate: %-8s (%ss)   ' "$st" "$((i*10))"
+  case "$st" in success) echo; break;; failure|error) die "gate FAILED on the converted pod -- REVERT PR #7";; esac
+  sleep 10
+done
+[ "$st" = success ] || die "gate never completed on the converted pod -- REVERT PR #7; do NOT enable enforcement"
+echo "  the converted sidecar ran a real job green. Enforcement is now safe."
+
+say "STEP 5 — require the gate + one approval"
+"$D/require-gate.sh"
+
+say "STEP 6 — prove a direct push is rejected (do not trust the API's word)"
+git fetch -q origin && git checkout -q main && git reset -q --hard origin/main
+git commit -q --allow-empty -m 'protection probe'
+if git push origin main 2>&1 | grep -q 'protected branch'; then
+  echo "  CONFIRMED: push to main rejected by the pre-receive hook."
+else
+  echo "  WARNING: the push was NOT rejected -- protection is not doing what it claims."
+fi
+git reset -q --hard origin/main
+
+say "FINAL STATE"
+api "$A/branches/main" | jq -r '{protected,user_can_push,enable_status_check,status_check_contexts,required_approvals}'

infra/plex/claim-ship.sh

@@ -26,9 +26,10 @@ creds="$(printf 'protocol=https\nhost=%s\n\n' "$HOST" | git credential fill)"
 U="$(sed -n 's/^username=//p' <<<"$creds")"; P="$(sed -n 's/^password=//p' <<<"$creds")"
 api() { curl -sS --config <(printf 'user = "%s:%s"\n' "$U" "$P") "$@"; }
 
-# feat/ prefix ON PURPOSE. act_runner capacity is 1, and gate.yml's PUSH trigger covers
-# feature/** fix/** docs/** chore/** but NOT feat/** — so a chore/ branch would fire a
-# second, redundant run that SERIALISES ahead of the PR run and doubles the wall clock.
+# Branch prefix is now cosmetic. It used to matter: gate.yml's push trigger covered
+# feature/** fix/** docs/** chore/** but not feat/**, and with act_runner at capacity 1 a
+# matching prefix fired a redundant run that serialised ahead of the PR run. Those
+# per-branch push triggers were deleted, so no prefix produces a duplicate run any more.
 BRANCH="feat/plex-claim-token-$(date +%H%M%S)"
 
 el "committing on $BRANCH"