Changed secret

Reviewed-on: #60
Reviewed-by: Keith Jackson <[email protected]>

decisions/2026-10-05-pm-agent-registry-pull-prereq.md

@@ -0,0 +1,127 @@
+---
+date: 2026-10-05
+branch: docs/pm-agent-registry-pull-prereq
+title: pm-agent reconciled exactly as designed — and is the first workload ever to pull from the in-cluster registry, which does not work yet
+---
+
+## What changed
+
+Documentation only. No manifest, no policy, no code.
+
+PR #57 merged and `pm-agent` reconciled. I measured what landed, and the measurement turned
+up **two prerequisites for the next operator step that nothing in this repository
+declares** — and that the handoff entry for #57 could not have known, because it listed the
+image pull as unverified and that is exactly where it bit.
+
+So this entry records the post-merge measurement, and
+`platform/pm-agent/README.md`, `docs/plans/pm-agent-issue-to-pr.md` and
+`runbooks/pm-agent.md` now name both prerequisites where they say "build, push, pin the
+digest". Before this, that step read as one action; it is three, and the two new ones are
+not an agent's to perform.
+
+**The finding is not specific to pm-agent.** `conformance-runner` has the identical
+registry path (`gitea.home.keithjackson.dev/home-network/...`), the identical "operator
+pushes, a digest goes in a PR" model, and has never been pulled either — so the same two
+blockers sit in front of the L2/L3 conformance wiring. Measured: **no pod anywhere in the
+cluster references that registry** except the pm-agent dispatcher, which is therefore the
+first workload ever to try it.
+
+## What I verified
+
+Read-only, through the pinned toolbox, against the live prod cluster.
+
+**The merge reconciled, completely and exactly as designed.**
+
+- `GitRepository/flux-system` artifact revision: `main@sha1:95597bd6883637…` — the merge
+  commit. `platform-config`, `pm-agent` and `apps-wave-0` all report that same
+  `lastAppliedRevision` with `Ready=True`. Compared field to field, per CLAUDE.md §2b,
+  rather than assumed from the merge.
+- **The security boundary is live.** `ClusterPolicy/pm-agent-job-shape`:
+  `validationFailureAction=Enforce`, `failurePolicy=Fail`, `Ready=True`, and all six rules
+  present (`worker-must-be-the-committed-shape`,
+  `worker-must-be-one-container-with-no-args`,
+  `worker-volumes-must-be-workspace-or-tmp-emptydirs`,
+  `worker-may-not-declare-init-or-ephemeral-containers`,
+  `worker-env-names-must-be-the-committed-set`, `worker-may-not-use-envfrom`). This is the
+  check that mattered most: a ClusterPolicy added to the wrong kustomization list ships
+  green and never reaches the cluster, which is what happened to the conformance boundary
+  on 2026-09-29.
+- Namespace contents: both ServiceAccounts, `pm-agent-config` (17 keys), the
+  `pm-agent-credentials` Secret, the `default-deny` NetworkPolicy, and both
+  CiliumNetworkPolicies with `VALID=True`.
+- **SOPS decryption works through the new overlay patch.** Checked by KEY NAMES and VALUE
+  LENGTHS only, never values (CLAUDE.md §6): keys `gitea-token`, `claude-code-oauth-token`,
+  lengths 76 and 52 bytes — which are the base64 lengths of the committed placeholder
+  strings, so the Secret holds the decrypted placeholders and not ciphertext. A
+  ciphertext apply succeeds silently and would have left `ENC[AES256_GCM,…]` values an
+  order of magnitude longer.
+- **`pm-agent-worker` really is bound to nothing.** The namespace has exactly one
+  RoleBinding (`pm-agent` → Role `pm-agent`, subject `ServiceAccount/pm-agent`), and no
+  ClusterRoleBinding anywhere names either pm-agent ServiceAccount.
+- `gitea-allow-pm-agent-ingress` is applied in the `gitea` namespace, matching
+  `io.kubernetes.pod.namespace: pm-agent`.
+- The dispatcher is `ImagePullBackOff` on the all-zero placeholder digest — the designed,
+  visible failure.
+
+**The two prerequisites, measured.**
+
+1. **The nodes cannot verify the registry's TLS certificate.** containerd's error on the
+   pull is not about the digest:
+
+       failed to resolve reference "gitea.home.keithjackson.dev/home-network/agent-runner@sha256:000…":
+       tls: failed to verify certificate: x509: certificate is not valid for any names,
+       but wanted to match gitea.home.keithjackson.dev
+
+   "not valid for **any** names" means the certificate presented to the node carries no
+   matching SAN at all. From the operator's workstation the same name is healthy: it
+   resolves to `192.168.2.20` and serves a Let's Encrypt certificate
+   `CN=*.home.keithjackson.dev` with SANs `*.home.keithjackson.dev, home.keithjackson.dev`
+   — and `Certificate gateway/wildcard-home` is `Ready=True` for exactly those names. So
+   the certificate that *should* be served is fine, and what the NODE reaches is not what
+   the workstation reaches. **Correcting the digest will not clear this.**
+2. **Anonymous pulls from this registry are refused.** Not inferred from a bare 401 — that
+   would have been wrong, because this Gitea answers 401 for *everything* anonymously:
+   `/v2/home-network/agent-runner/manifests/latest`, `/v2/home-network/conformance-runner/…`,
+   a randomly-named nonexistent repository, and `nosuchowner/nosuchimage` all return 401,
+   and `/api/v1/packages/Home-Network` returns `{"message":"token is required"}`. The
+   registry *does* issue a token to an anonymous client, but its `access` claim is `null` —
+   no pull scope. So the conclusion that holds is the simple one: **an unauthenticated
+   client gets nothing from this registry**, so a pull with no credential cannot succeed.
+   And `grep` over the tree finds **no `imagePullSecrets` anywhere** — not in
+   `platform/pm-agent/deployment.yaml`, not in `infra/agent/worker-job-template.yaml`, not
+   in `conformance/incluster/`.
+
+## What I did NOT verify
+
+- **Why the node sees a nameless certificate.** I measured that it does, and that the LAN
+  does not. I did not diagnose it: I did not read the nodes' resolver or
+  `/etc/rancher/k3s/registries.yaml` (node files, not reachable read-only through the API),
+  and I did not check whether the node resolves the name to the same `192.168.2.20` the
+  workstation does or to something else.
+
+  **A correction to a remark I first wrote here:** I cited
+  `cluster-vars`'s `GATEWAY_VIP: 192.168.1.53` as suspicious next to the nodes'
+  `192.168.2.x`. That was noise — the operator confirms those base `cluster-vars` values are
+  **dev-era leftovers for a cluster that is decommissioned**, so the 192.168.1.x addresses in
+  that file say nothing about prod and should not be read as evidence about anything. The
+  measured facts stand on their own and none of them depended on that knob.
+- **Whether the package would be pullable once authenticated.** Nothing has ever been
+  pushed to that path, so "a credential is sufficient" is untested. The only thing
+  established is that no credential is insufficient.
+- **Which fix the operator wants.** Two routes, and they are not equivalent:
+  (a) an `imagePullSecret` — a `dockerconfigjson` holding a Gitea token, SOPS-encrypted
+  like `pm-agent-credentials`, referenced from the Deployment *and* from the committed
+  worker Job template; note the Job template's shape is pinned by admission, and
+  `imagePullSecrets` is a field that policy does not currently constrain, so adding one is
+  a template change that needs a deliberate look at whether the policy should pin it too.
+  (b) allowing anonymous reads of that package in Gitea — no manifest change at all, but it
+  makes the image world-readable to anything that can reach the host.
+  I have implemented neither: both need an operator action I must not take, and (b) is a
+  posture decision. The docs now present both.
+- **Everything the #57 entry listed as unverified about RUNTIME remains unverified.** The
+  image has still never been built or pushed. No dispatcher has authenticated to Gitea, no
+  issue has been triaged, no worker Job has been created — so the admission policy, though
+  now provably applied and Enforce, has still never refused or admitted a real Job. The
+  network policies have not carried traffic.
+- **I did not re-run the merge gate against `main` after the merge.** This branch's own gate
+  run is the evidence for this change; the merged state's is CI run on PR #57.

decisions/2026-10-06-pm-agent-node-resolves-gitea-to-wan.md

@@ -0,0 +1,126 @@
+---
+date: 2026-10-06
+branch: docs/pm-agent-registry-pull-prereq
+title: The nodes resolve gitea to the WAN, so the failing certificate is the router's — the second node process to need the issuer pin
+---
+
+## What changed
+
+The image pull for `pm-agent` failed TLS verification, and the previous entry on this branch
+honestly recorded it as **not diagnosed**. The operator asked for the diagnosis before any
+registry design. This is it, and the fix turns out to be a pattern this repository already
+has.
+
+`infra/ansible/inventory/group_vars/k3s_prod/vars.yml` now pins
+`gitea.{{ k3s_base_domain }}` → `192.168.2.20` in `node_baseline_hosts_pins`, beside the
+Keycloak issuer pin that is there for the identical reason.
+
+**It reaches the nodes the way every other node setting in this project does — through
+Ansible, from the inventory.** Node configuration is Ansible's (and, for the dev VMs,
+OpenTofu's); nothing here touches a node by hand. For prod specifically, Ansible is the
+*only* surface: `infra/PROD-PROVISIONING.md` records that prod is 3× bare metal and that the
+dev path (OpenTofu → Proxmox VM → cloud-init) does not apply, so there is no
+cloud-init/tofu half to keep in parity for this. The one scoped, idempotent command:
+
+    cd infra/ansible && ansible-playbook playbooks/node-baseline.yml \
+      -e k3s_hosts=k3s_prod --tags hosts
+
+`--tags hosts` runs ONLY the `/etc/hosts` task, so applying this pin cannot drift any other
+baseline setting. Running the play is an operator action (it has become/root on prod), but
+the configuration itself is declared, reviewed and version-controlled — not typed on a node.
+
+The docs that described this as an undiagnosed blocker now describe the cause and the fix:
+`platform/pm-agent/README.md`, `runbooks/pm-agent.md` (its symptom row now names the pin and
+the play), and `docs/plans/pm-agent-issue-to-pr.md`.
+
+Also recorded, in the two places an operator reads when creating the credential: **the agent
+authenticates to Gitea with a local account and a scoped PAT, by decision** (operator,
+2026-10-06), not with a federated identity. Written down because the alternative looks
+obviously better until you check whether it is possible — see below.
+
+## What I verified
+
+Every step measured, read-only, in this order.
+
+**The failing certificate is the router's, not the Gateway's.**
+
+- containerd's error names TLS, not the digest: `tls: failed to verify certificate: x509:
+  certificate is not valid for any names, but wanted to match gitea.home.keithjackson.dev`.
+  "not valid for **any** names" means the presented certificate carries no SANs at all.
+- `192.168.2.20` is the shared Gateway's own LoadBalancer VIP
+  (`gateway/cilium-gateway-shared`, from the Cilium pool `192.168.2.20-30`), and its `https`
+  listener serves `*.home.keithjackson.dev` with `wildcard-home-tls`. From the operator's
+  workstation the name resolves there and serves the real Let's Encrypt
+  `CN=*.home.keithjackson.dev` with correct SANs. **So the certificate and the Gateway are
+  healthy.**
+- **The node asks a different resolver and gets a different answer.** Prod's
+  `node_baseline_dns_servers` is the LAN gateway, not Pi-hole — deliberately, as that file
+  explains. Public DNS for this zone is a CNAME to `wan.home.keithjackson.dev`: measured via
+  both `1.1.1.1` and `8.8.8.8`, `gitea.home.keithjackson.dev` →
+  `wan.home.keithjackson.dev.` → `136.51.115.252`, and the apex answers the same.
+- **That address serves a certificate with no names.** Measured from the workstation against
+  the WAN address with the right SNI:
+
+      subject=C=ZZ, ST=Somewhere, L=Unknown, O=%D342e7e6b, CN=%D
+      issuer=C=ZZ, ST=Somewhere, L=Unknown, O=%D342e7e6b, CN=%D
+      No extensions in certificate
+
+  No extensions means no `subjectAltName`, which is exactly "not valid for any names". The
+  `CN=%D` is the router's placeholder.
+
+**This repository had already measured the same thing, for Keycloak, and I did not need to
+re-derive it.** `infra/ansible/inventory/group_vars/k3s_prod/vars.yml` says, above the pin:
+"Since platform/gateway/gateway.yaml set an external-dns `target`, every public name is a
+CNAME to wan.home.keithjackson.dev = the home WAN IP. The SOHO router does NOT hairpin: from
+the LAN, WAN:443 answers with the router's own self-signed placeholder cert (measured from
+k3s-prod-2/-3 2026-10-03: `curl` exit 60, ssl_verify_result=18)." Same cause, same symptom,
+one name later. The pin exists precisely for node processes that must reach the Gateway
+directly; containerd is one, and nobody had added it.
+
+**The parity the pin has to satisfy:** `192.168.2.20` equals the live
+`GATEWAY_VIP`, and `k3s_base_domain` equals the live `BASE_DOMAIN` — both read from the
+cluster, not from the comment that claims prod serves `prod.home.keithjackson.dev` (it does
+not; `flux-system/cluster-vars` reports `BASE_DOMAIN=home.keithjackson.dev` and
+`GATEWAY_VIP=192.168.2.20`, and Ansible's `k3s_base_domain` is `home.keithjackson.dev`).
+That comment is stale history.
+
+**The credential decision, and why the obvious alternative is not available.** Gitea's API
+accepts basic auth, PATs, SSH signatures and its own OAuth2 bearer tokens; as an OAuth2
+provider Gitea implements **only the Authorization Code Grant** (plus PKCE/OIDC), so there
+is no client-credentials grant, and nothing in Gitea validates a token issued by a
+third-party OIDC provider. A Keycloak service-account token therefore cannot authenticate to
+Gitea's API or to git-over-HTTP. Read from Gitea's own documentation
+(`docs.gitea.com/development/api-usage`, `/development/oauth2-provider`), not assumed.
+
+**Gate:** `./ci/gate.sh` in the pinned toolbox from a §0 worktree — see the branch's run; rc 3
+with `gitea-settings` the only stage that did not run.
+
+## What I did NOT verify
+
+- **That the pin fixes the pull.** It is IaC, and nothing has applied it: `/etc/hosts` on the
+  nodes is written by the `node_baseline` play's `hosts`-tagged task, which is an operator
+  action. I did confirm the mechanism is not inert — `roles/node_baseline/tasks/main.yml`
+  renders `node_baseline_hosts_pins` into a marked `blockinfile` with `backup: true`, and
+  `state: absent` when the list empties, so a removed entry really leaves the node. Until that runs
+  and an image exists, "the node now reaches the Gateway" is a design claim. The evidence
+  that it *will* is the Keycloak pin working for the same cause — which I also did not
+  re-measure.
+- **Why public DNS answers at all for an `internal` service.** `catalog/gitea.yaml` sets no
+  `exposure`, so it inherits `internal`, and the renderer contract says an internal service's
+  HTTPRoute carries `external-dns.alpha.kubernetes.io/controller: none` and publishes no
+  public record. Yet `gitea.home.keithjackson.dev` resolves publicly to the WAN CNAME. I did
+  not chase that: it may be a zone-level wildcard rather than a published record, and it did
+  not change the diagnosis. It is worth someone's attention, because "internal services
+  publish no public DNS" is an L0-checked claim and this looks like a case where the *name*
+  resolves regardless of what the renderer withheld.
+- **Registry authentication.** Unchanged and still open: an unauthenticated client gets
+  nothing from this registry, and no `imagePullSecret` exists anywhere in the tree. With the
+  credential model now decided (local Gitea accounts with PATs) the shape is a
+  `dockerconfigjson` for an account whose token carries `read:package`, referenced from the
+  Deployment and the committed worker Job template — and the worker Job template's shape is
+  pinned by admission, so whether the policy should also pin `imagePullSecrets` deserves a
+  deliberate look rather than a quiet addition. Not built: minting that token is an operator
+  action, and I did not want to guess at a second credential's scope.
+- **Anything about runtime.** The image still does not exist. No dispatcher has
+  authenticated, no issue has been triaged, no worker Job has been created, and the admission
+  policy — live, `Enforce`, six rules — has still never admitted or refused a real Job.

docs/plans/pm-agent-issue-to-pr.md

@@ -233,9 +233,21 @@ about runtime behaviour in this document is a design claim, not a measurement.
 
 ## Follow-ups, in the order they are worth doing
 
-1. **Build, push, pin.** Operator runs `infra/agent/build-image.sh`, pushes, and one PR
-   replaces both placeholder digests. Expect the build to need iteration: the nodejs module
-   stream and the npm install have never run against this base.
+1. **Make the registry pullable, THEN build, push, pin.** Measured after the merge, and
+   neither half is declared anywhere in this repository
+   (`decisions/2026-10-05-pm-agent-registry-pull-prereq.md`):
+   (i) the nodes resolved the registry hostname to the WAN IP and failed TLS against the
+   router's `CN=%D` placeholder certificate — **diagnosed and fixed** by pinning
+   `gitea.{{ k3s_base_domain }}` to the Gateway VIP in `node_baseline_hosts_pins`, the same
+   pin the Keycloak issuer already carries, applied by
+   `ansible-playbook playbooks/node-baseline.yml -e k3s_hosts=k3s_prod --tags hosts`;
+   (ii) the pull is still unauthenticated and no `imagePullSecret` exists in the tree — with
+   the credential decision now being local Gitea accounts with PATs, that means a
+   `dockerconfigjson` for an account whose token carries `read:package`. Only then does the
+   digest matter. Operator runs `infra/agent/build-image.sh`, pushes, and one PR replaces both
+   placeholder digests. Expect the build itself to need iteration too: the nodejs module
+   stream and the npm install have never run against this base. The same two blockers sit in
+   front of `conformance-runner`, which shares the registry path and has never been pulled.
 2. **Create the credentials** per `pm-agent-credentials.sops.yaml.example`, and **verify the
    bot's permission is `write`, not `admin`** — that measurement is the control that keeps
    the agent out of its own approval gate.

infra/agent/pm-worker

@@ -90,9 +90,19 @@ esac
 # pointing at an external host would be REACHABLE: it could clone a repository that is not
 # this one and push this repository's work somewhere else. The allowlist is baked in here,
 # where changing it requires rebuilding the image whose digest admission pins.
+#
+# ONE ENTRY, AND IT IS THE CLUSTER-LOCAL SERVICE NAME. This agent runs INSIDE the cluster, so
+# it reaches Gitea the way every other in-cluster consumer does — `*.svc.cluster.local` —
+# which is by design a different path from how a client outside the cluster reaches the same
+# service. The external hostname `gitea.home.keithjackson.dev` used to be a second accepted
+# value here; it is removed deliberately. It was never needed (nothing sets it), it routes
+# in-cluster traffic out through the Gateway and back for no reason, and as an ACCEPTED value
+# it widened this allowlist to a host reachable over the `world:443` egress rule — which is
+# the exact shape of injection the allowlist exists to refuse. The cluster-local name also
+# depends on none of public DNS, Cloudflare, the Gateway or the certificate.
 case "${PM_GITEA_URL}" in
-  http://gitea.gitea.svc.cluster.local:3000|https://gitea.home.keithjackson.dev) ;;
-  *) die "PM_GITEA_URL '${PM_GITEA_URL}' is not an allowed git host (see this script's header)" ;;
+  http://gitea.gitea.svc.cluster.local:3000) ;;
+  *) die "PM_GITEA_URL '${PM_GITEA_URL}' is not the allowed in-cluster git host (see this script's header)" ;;
 esac
 [[ "${PM_GITEA_OWNER}" =~ ^[A-Za-z0-9][A-Za-z0-9._-]{0,38}$ ]] || die "PM_GITEA_OWNER is malformed"
 [[ "${PM_GITEA_REPO}"  =~ ^[A-Za-z0-9][A-Za-z0-9._-]{0,99}$ ]] || die "PM_GITEA_REPO is malformed"

infra/agent/probe-validation.sh

@@ -86,12 +86,22 @@ refuses "branch equal to the base branch"       "must not be the base branch" \
 # --- where code comes FROM and goes TO -------------------------------------
 # The namespace's egress policy permits tcp/443 to the world (the model needs it), so an
 # injected host would be REACHABLE. These are the cases that matter most.
-refuses "a redirected git host"                 "is not an allowed git host" \
+refuses "a redirected git host"                 "is not the allowed in-cluster git host" \
         PM_GITEA_URL=https://evil.invalid
-refuses "a real, reachable, WRONG git host"     "is not an allowed git host" \
+refuses "a real, reachable, WRONG git host"     "is not the allowed in-cluster git host" \
         PM_GITEA_URL=https://github.com
-refuses "the right host on a smuggled path"     "is not an allowed git host" \
+refuses "the right host on a smuggled path"     "is not the allowed in-cluster git host" \
         PM_GITEA_URL=http://gitea.gitea.svc.cluster.local:3000/../..
+# This agent is IN the cluster, so it reaches Gitea by its cluster-local service name. The
+# EXTERNAL hostname is refused too — it used to be a second accepted value, and as an
+# accepted value it widened this allowlist to a host reachable over the `world:443` egress
+# rule, which is the injection shape the allowlist exists to refuse.
+refuses "this Gitea's EXTERNAL hostname"        "is not the allowed in-cluster git host" \
+        PM_GITEA_URL=https://gitea.home.keithjackson.dev
+refuses "the cluster-local name over https"     "is not the allowed in-cluster git host" \
+        PM_GITEA_URL=https://gitea.gitea.svc.cluster.local:3000
+refuses "the cluster-local name, wrong port"    "is not the allowed in-cluster git host" \
+        PM_GITEA_URL=http://gitea.gitea.svc.cluster.local:8080
 refuses "a malformed owner"                     "PM_GITEA_OWNER is malformed" \
         'PM_GITEA_OWNER=../other-org'
 refuses "a malformed repository"                "PM_GITEA_REPO is malformed" \

infra/ansible/inventory/group_vars/k3s_prod/vars.yml

@@ -327,6 +327,29 @@ node_baseline_hosts_pins:
   - ip: "192.168.2.20"
     names:
       - "keycloak.{{ k3s_base_domain }}"
+      # gitea: the SECOND node process to need this pin, for the identical reason, found
+      # 2026-10-06. containerd pulls images as a NODE process, so it resolves through the
+      # public upstreams above and gets the CNAME to wan.home.keithjackson.dev — the WAN IP,
+      # which this router does not hairpin. The pull then fails on the router's own
+      # placeholder certificate rather than on anything to do with the image:
+      #
+      #   failed to resolve reference "gitea.home.keithjackson.dev/home-network/agent-runner@sha256:…":
+      #   tls: failed to verify certificate: x509: certificate is not valid for any names,
+      #   but wanted to match gitea.home.keithjackson.dev
+      #
+      # Measured from the workstation the same day, against the WAN address with that SNI:
+      #   subject=C=ZZ, ST=Somewhere, L=Unknown, O=%D342e7e6b, CN=%D
+      #   No extensions in certificate          <- no SANs at all, hence "not valid for ANY names"
+      # while the same name via PiHole answers 192.168.2.20 and serves the real
+      # Let's Encrypt *.home.keithjackson.dev. So the certificate and the Gateway are fine;
+      # only the node's ANSWER is wrong. Same root cause, same fix, as the issuer pin above.
+      #
+      # WHO NEEDS IT: any workload whose image lives in the in-cluster Gitea registry —
+      # today platform/pm-agent (agent-runner) and conformance/incluster
+      # (conformance-runner), neither of which has ever been pulled. A pull is still
+      # UNAUTHENTICATED after this pin, which is a separate thing to settle; this only makes
+      # the node reach the right endpoint.
+      - "gitea.{{ k3s_base_domain }}"
 
 # --- platform hostname suffix, ANSIBLE SIDE (R-ENV-02, R-DNS-01) --------------------
 # PROD SERVES ITS OWN SUBDOMAIN. [parity] MUST equal BASE_DOMAIN in clusters/prod/

platform/pm-agent/README.md

@@ -22,6 +22,25 @@ requires.
 
 ---
 
+## Why the agent authenticates to Gitea with a local account and a PAT
+
+Not Keycloak, and that is a decision rather than an omission (operator, 2026-10-06): the
+agents only ever talk to Gitea, so a local Gitea account with a scoped personal access token
+is the whole requirement, and it is drastically simpler than federating a machine identity.
+
+It is also what Gitea can actually do. Keycloak service accounts were considered and are not
+available for this: Gitea's API accepts basic auth, PATs, SSH signatures and **its own**
+OAuth2 bearer tokens, and as an OAuth2 provider Gitea implements **only the Authorization
+Code Grant** — there is no client-credentials grant, and nothing in Gitea validates a token
+issued by a third-party OIDC provider. So a Keycloak service-account token cannot
+authenticate to Gitea's API or to git-over-HTTP at all. Keycloak remains what it is for human
+access: the browser login source registered on Gitea (`catalog/gitea.yaml`).
+
+What still matters, and is enforced by the hand-off rather than by Keycloak: **the account
+must not be an administrator** — `infra/gitea/approval-policy.json` authorises
+`/approve-override` on live repository permission alone, so an admin-permission bot could
+waive the sensitive-path human review on its own pull request.
+
 ## It does nothing at all until an operator does two things
 
 Both are deliberate, and both fail **visibly** rather than silently:
@@ -31,6 +50,36 @@ Both are deliberate, and both fail **visibly** rather than silently:
    `infra/agent/build-image.sh` (which verifies it and refuses to push), push it as the
    operator, then update **both** places with the digest `podman push --digestfile` returned,
    in one pull request. Until then: `ImagePullBackOff`.
+
+   **Two things have to be true before any digest will pull, and neither is declared in this
+   repository.** Both were measured after PR #57 merged — this service is the first workload
+   in the cluster ever to reference the in-cluster registry, so nothing had exercised the
+   path. Details and the exact commands:
+   [`decisions/2026-10-05-pm-agent-registry-pull-prereq.md`](../../decisions/2026-10-05-pm-agent-registry-pull-prereq.md).
+
+   - **The nodes resolve the registry hostname to the WAN, so the TLS they fail to verify is
+     the router's — DIAGNOSED 2026-10-06, and fixed in this change.** containerd pulls as a
+     *node* process, so it resolves through the node's public upstreams
+     (`node_baseline_dns_servers` = the LAN gateway) rather than through Pi-hole. The public
+     answer for every name in this zone is a CNAME to `wan.home.keithjackson.dev` — the WAN
+     IP — which this router does not hairpin; it answers :443 with its own placeholder
+     certificate `CN=%D` carrying **no extensions, therefore no SANs**, which is precisely
+     `x509: certificate is not valid for any names`. The Gateway, the wildcard certificate
+     and the digest were never implicated. The fix is the pin this repository already uses
+     for the Keycloak issuer, for the identical reason: `gitea.{{ k3s_base_domain }}` is now
+     in `node_baseline_hosts_pins` — node configuration is Ansible's, declared in the
+     inventory, never typed on a node. Apply it scoped to that one task:
+     `cd infra/ansible && ansible-playbook playbooks/node-baseline.yml -e k3s_hosts=k3s_prod
+     --tags hosts`.
+   - **The pull is still unauthenticated** once the node reaches the right endpoint. An
+     unauthenticated client gets nothing from this Gitea's registry, and there is no
+     `imagePullSecret` anywhere in the tree. Consistent with the agent credential decision
+     (local Gitea accounts with PATs), the fix is a `dockerconfigjson` for a local Gitea
+     account whose token carries `read:package`, referenced from the Deployment and the
+     committed worker Job template — not built yet, because minting that token is yours.
+
+   The same two apply to `conformance-runner`: same registry path, same push-then-pin model,
+   never pulled either.
 2. **The credentials are placeholders.** `pm-agent-credentials.sops.yaml` is encrypted to the
    repository's age recipient but holds `REPLACE-ME-…` strings. The hand-off —
    which Gitea account to create, which scopes, and why it must *not* be an administrator —
@@ -96,7 +145,7 @@ Job from a committed template. **The model's output is data, never a command.**
 | **cannot** | merge anything — the gate is the approver, and the service makes no merge call |
 | **cannot** | reach the Kubernetes API: no ServiceAccount token is mounted, the `pm-agent-worker` identity is bound to nothing, and the egress policy does not include the API server. `kubectl` is on its `PATH` (the gate's toolchain needs it) and is inert |
 | **cannot** | reach anything except this Gitea and tcp/443 — no package registry, no GitHub |
-| **cannot** | clone from or push to any host but this Gitea: `pm-worker` validates `PM_GITEA_URL` against an allowlist baked into the image |
+| **cannot** | clone from or push to anywhere but `gitea.gitea.svc.cluster.local:3000`: `pm-worker` validates `PM_GITEA_URL` against a one-entry allowlist baked into the image. In-cluster consumers reach a service by its cluster-local name — a different path by design from how a client outside the cluster reaches it — so the external hostname is not an accepted value |
 | **cannot** | authenticate a `git push` **during the model session**: `GIT_ASKPASS` is unset for its duration, so the restriction is structural rather than a request in a prompt |
 | **cannot** | be created in any shape but the committed one — see the admission policy |
 

platform/pm-agent/pm-agent-credentials.sops.yaml.example

@@ -51,6 +51,15 @@
 # (2) MINT THE GITEA TOKEN as that user (log in as `pm-agent`, or use the admin API to
 #     create a token for it): Settings -> Applications -> Generate New Token.
 #
+#     A LOCAL GITEA ACCOUNT WITH A PAT IS THE DECIDED MODEL (operator, 2026-10-06), not
+#     Keycloak. The agents only ever talk to Gitea, so this is the whole requirement and it
+#     is far simpler than federating a machine identity. It is also the only thing that
+#     works: Gitea's API accepts basic auth, PATs, SSH signatures and its OWN OAuth2 bearer
+#     tokens, and as a provider Gitea implements only the Authorization Code Grant — no
+#     client-credentials grant, and nothing that validates a third-party OIDC token. A
+#     Keycloak service-account token therefore cannot authenticate to Gitea's API or to
+#     git-over-HTTP. Do not "upgrade" this to Keycloak without re-reading that.
+#
 #       Scopes: `write:repository` and `write:issue`. Nothing else — in particular NOT
 #       `write:admin`, NOT `write:organization`, NOT `write:user`.
 #

platform/vpn-ingress/wg-server-key.sops.yaml

@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ stringData:
     #ENC[AES256_GCM,data:fUoPkfWvasisdTtwdhjeOVOlmdQkTl6Bp9YxYyji8g6k+ClATds3BnHJWOj2iplaGpT2XaNakq1+D4YyOi7QbFvNJui+e4qRpqcY8hWnazvZIHJYxjxfAfzW,iv:xtKd6oMZQumAQJAsNLHqJB+o0wdQJ+vL1kI1mc9jL7w=,tag:aImqLgbSmhsRI36/t5kpyg==,type:comment]
     #ENC[AES256_GCM,data:npDsCW6rQleolIpur5gFkX2jSRrIQzBlGaIPs2Schv0YU3q8AanG39z4QqT3ASDmskV5YuH29Bo0ujEAgBf52YIjQCp58PDDETofrVKOJzhHMa7bV+HCxUFE,iv:7E7thyFBleyqZpqJRGApKvIq3ubCFOkshF/mxim3YPc=,tag:joIrhMe2I6kUnx1ouOPdZw==,type:comment]
     #ENC[AES256_GCM,data:wHUFx09FgP/2+LTyw61EFbKA5UaqfjU7CeGk6Xc5av2y4r4AvQJRefDM5EGlahKecDFEFsf7fSQRFRHtUJqrQTtw+6tcj3ubSCPW4iJvhyJJv0xdb/0puRmcgj+2NfgF,iv:xgDOSDLqMQ1wcI9vrkKqfNMgIDFEusFnnO7Rzq/aOa4=,tag:m1m/fgjkBsG91c+3daqOpA==,type:comment]
-    privatekey: ENC[AES256_GCM,data:irLENWa1Z3IJSQ==,iv:Qu2Yr6F5+M6P8cQRuhB5J7joxCcudUhwoEWDiL941Lo=,tag:ZNwcBZEkswtnkX0vGKfMAQ==,type:str]
+    privatekey: ENC[AES256_GCM,data:ML8CPNm4JwhQHUTUUxZO/I+9X15BCIGqOb1Uw9EmX5RTAsxQ9N97YvkYlbY=,iv:5ZUsFdMMmeGsy4fNbk6qbJkzweMVWXZ5g6E7NciAGUg=,tag:pAHv3ieLjoEyFbqbWXsVgg==,type:str]
 sops:
     kms: []
     gcp_kms: []
@@ -27,8 +27,8 @@ sops:
             SUUzN1FnMlI4bkkzbVNlMWhUVnJZODAKQ+Iy86CIv/Oj9E9j4E/0y5hDbcctRuqB
             OR825KRPRaTdF/G2hudE1R1JbM4wGbPLMzv078R4ZXHDPGvDttSEkA==
             -----END AGE ENCRYPTED FILE-----
-    lastmodified: "2026-10-06T04:20:58Z"
-    mac: ENC[AES256_GCM,data:GpP/zTX4FtJyrlaCS/R0/sAtFbkM0W8A5sqNxb5ZziSgLUXI+oUKYB09igN6vx5cjRNH7rSmXduS/actaT5jhP8kuF1n/iQfG56PsCJHL2vneefzcEOKXeGquAwDOY+iGmNsZ5R8ySrM/Fq7HYLMJasWosyTh3YlBs8GRYiHmU4=,iv:438+pDzHLGyh+OMQCMzGBEBrZUPNp5BbjrrMdiEiqJ8=,tag:JqLu6zZWKtcoB8mp4HSZig==,type:str]
+    lastmodified: "2026-10-06T06:10:31Z"
+    mac: ENC[AES256_GCM,data:6wAGAwWL7jI/NEeswBnUiWoRty+bb5DEsGEAPXajKNNYCwtm5yuXBrcOI/q4w6H8FG+nqVAECkdpAOI3S9mjDfc2zlWAzfCJJdDic92RKPXOC0tOH/M1BBSGJ1fVdJGAZZT1yAVxmtYy9WohJpawv3kmsVv+JnD+TIqmZ1CJHXo=,iv:srs4o0olSwmraQQgmdPxb+4h/t6fHHeFKJ2z914kGgY=,tag:jjoIKhU8Tu9i5SJkvkfcCg==,type:str]
     pgp: []
     encrypted_regex: ^(data|stringData)$
     version: 3.9.4

runbooks/pm-agent.md

@@ -67,7 +67,9 @@ Work through these in order; the first three are by far the most likely.
 | Symptom in the log | Cause | Fix |
 |---|---|---|
 | `GET /user returned no login — is GITEA_TOKEN valid?` and a CrashLoop | the credentials are still the committed **placeholders**, or the token was revoked | fill them in per `platform/pm-agent/pm-agent-credentials.sops.yaml.example` |
-| `ImagePullBackOff`, digest `sha256:0000…` | the image has never been pushed; the committed digest is the deliberate placeholder | `infra/agent/build-image.sh`, operator pushes, then one PR updates the digest in **both** `deployment.yaml` and `configmap.yaml` (`PM_WORKER_IMAGE`) |
+| `ImagePullBackOff`, digest `sha256:0000…` | the image has never been pushed; the committed digest is the deliberate placeholder | `infra/agent/build-image.sh`, operator pushes, then one PR updates the digest in **both** `deployment.yaml` and `configmap.yaml` (`PM_WORKER_IMAGE`) — but read the row below first |
+| `ImagePullBackOff` with `x509: certificate is not valid for any names` | **diagnosed.** containerd pulls as a node process, resolves through the node's public upstreams, and gets the CNAME to the WAN IP — which this router does not hairpin, so it answers :443 with its own `CN=%D` placeholder certificate (no SANs at all). Nothing to do with the digest, the Gateway or the wildcard cert | the `/etc/hosts` pin for `gitea.{{ k3s_base_domain }}` → `192.168.2.20` in `infra/ansible/inventory/group_vars/k3s_prod/vars.yml` fixes it — the same pin the Keycloak issuer already has. Apply it with the project's own tooling, scoped to just that task: `cd infra/ansible && ansible-playbook playbooks/node-baseline.yml -e k3s_hosts=k3s_prod --tags hosts`. Full evidence: `decisions/2026-10-06-pm-agent-node-resolves-gitea-to-wan.md` |
+| `ImagePullBackOff` with `401 Unauthorized` once TLS works | the pull is unauthenticated. An anonymous client gets nothing from this Gitea's registry, and no `imagePullSecret` exists anywhere in the tree | add one (a `dockerconfigjson`, SOPS-encrypted like `pm-agent-credentials`, referenced from the Deployment **and** the committed worker Job template) or allow anonymous reads of the package in Gitea — a posture decision, so yours |
 | `PM_WORKER_IMAGE must be digest-pinned` | someone put a tag in the ConfigMap | use the digest from `podman push --digestfile` |
 | `scope: ONLY issues labelled 'agent'` | `PM_REQUIRE_LABEL` is set; unlabelled issues are out of scope by configuration | label the issue, or clear the knob |
 | `cycle: 2 worker(s) active` and nothing new | at `PM_MAX_ACTIVE_WORKERS` | wait, or raise it (RAM is the binding constraint: each worker's limit is 2Gi) |