.gitea/workflows/README.md

@@ -40,9 +40,15 @@ and ADR-0011: **CI holds no broad kubeconfig.** L2/L3 run as an in-cluster **Cha
 *collects* its artifacts, using a narrow trigger credential referenced **by secret name only**
 (`secrets.CONFORMANCE_TRIGGER_KUBECONFIG`) — never a plaintext secret, never a cluster-admin kubeconfig.
 
-## Honest SKIP — never fake green (Phase 0)
+## Honest SKIP — never fake green
 
-**No cluster exists in Phase 0.** The gate is deliberately built so unavailable checks **SKIP loudly,
+**NOTE (2026-09-29):** this section is written in the past's voice — "Phase 0", "no cluster
+exists". **A cluster has existed for weeks** and Flux has been reconciling against it. The
+skip logic below is still correct and still honest, but read it as describing a **live
+coverage gap** (L2/L3 is not wired into CI) rather than an expected phase. Its being
+phrased as a phase is part of why the gap went unexamined.
+
+Originally: The gate is deliberately built so unavailable checks **SKIP loudly,
 they do not pass**:
 
 - The `conformance` job is `if: ${{ vars.CLUSTER_AVAILABLE == 'true' }}` — with no cluster it is
@@ -77,21 +83,29 @@ Both dirs are git-ignored (see [`.gitignore`](../../.gitignore)).
 ## Triggers & branch model (CONTRIBUTING.md)
 
 - `pull_request` → `main`: **PRs are the enforced merge gate into `main`.**
-- `push` → `feature/**`, `fix/**`, `docs/**`, `chore/**`: fast feedback on the branch. **No work on `main`.**
+- `push` → `main` only. The per-branch prefix list was removed: `act_runner` runs at capacity 1,
+  so a branch push fires a redundant run that serialises *ahead* of the PR run for the same tree.
+  **No work on `main`** — and since 2026-09-29 that is enforced, not conventional: `main` is a
+  protected branch and a direct push is rejected by the pre-receive hook (verified, not assumed).
 
-## Transition: generic-CI-now → Gitea-Actions-after-Gitea-is-up
+## Transition: COMPLETE (2026-09-29)
 
-Per [`CONTRIBUTING.md`](../../../home-network-k3s/CONTRIBUTING.md) and
-[`docs/05` §"local bootstrap → self-hosted Gitea"](../../../home-network-k3s/docs/05-gitops-and-delivery.md):
+This section used to describe a migration as pending. It has happened. Gitea is live at
+`gitea.home.keithjackson.dev`, the runner `incluster-dind` is registered and online, and
+`gate.yml` runs on every PR.
 
-1. **Now (interim):** there is **no remote git host** on this network. This workflow file is dormant —
-   but the **identical gate runs locally today** via `make -C ci gate` (R-TEST-02). Development is
-   local feature-branch → `main`, the gate enforced by convention + the local runner.
-2. **Gitea comes online early** (one of the first services onboarded) at `gitea.home.keithjackson.dev`.
-3. **CI moves to Gitea Actions:** this workflow activates unchanged. The only operational steps are
-   enabling a Gitea Actions runner and setting `vars.CLUSTER_AVAILABLE=true` +
-   `secrets.CONFORMANCE_TRIGGER_KUBECONFIG` once a dev/test cluster exists. PRs then become the
-   **platform-enforced** merge gate — the same no-work-in-main rule, now enforced by machine.
+**What took a month to notice:** the migration was recorded as done on 2026-08-31 without
+anyone checking the platform. In reality `main` had **no branch protection** and **zero
+runners were registered** until 2026-09-29. Every "the gate enforces this" statement in
+between rested on an assertion nobody verified. PR #1 — the first pull request this
+repository ever had — sat `pending` for 30.6 minutes because nothing existed to run it.
+
+So: **do not read this file, or the DECISIONS-LOG, as evidence about the live platform.**
+Query the API. `infra/gitea/` holds the scripts and the measured state.
+
+Still genuinely outstanding: `vars.CLUSTER_AVAILABLE` and
+`secrets.CONFORMANCE_TRIGGER_KUBECONFIG` are unset, so L2/L3 conformance does not run in
+CI. That is a real coverage gap, not a phase.
 
 ## Configuration (set in Gitea; referenced by name only)
 

.gitea/workflows/merge-gate.yaml

@@ -11,11 +11,14 @@
 #                                          v
 #                                     merge-gate decision  [R-TEST-03: touched subset green]
 #
-# Transition (CONTRIBUTING.md / docs/05 §"local bootstrap -> self-hosted Gitea"):
-# Today there is no Gitea host, so this file is dormant. The SAME gate is runnable
-# now via `make -C ci gate` (R-TEST-02). Once Gitea is self-hosted and Gitea
-# Actions is enabled, this workflow becomes the ENFORCED PR merge gate into main —
-# no code change required, only turning on the runner and setting CLUSTER_AVAILABLE.
+# STATUS (corrected 2026-09-29): Gitea IS hosted and Gitea Actions IS enabled; the runner
+# `incluster-dind` is online and gate.yml is the live PR gate. The text that used to sit here
+# ("Today there is no Gitea host, so this file is dormant") was stale by weeks -- it was written
+# as a plan and never revisited once the plan completed.
+#
+# THIS file is still dormant, but for the reason in the DORMANT block below -- its spec checkout
+# and L2/L3 seams are unwired -- NOT because there is no host. Do not read a stale plan as a
+# statement about the live platform; query the API instead (see infra/gitea/).
 #
 # CI holds NO broad kubeconfig. L2/L3 run as an in-cluster Chainsaw Job whose own
 # scoped ServiceAccount holds cluster access (docs/14, R-SEC-02); CI uses only a

CLAUDE.md

@@ -45,6 +45,35 @@ the toolbox gate yourself and quote its numbers. Never describe a PR as "green"
 strength of a check you have not seen report — and note that a **skipped** Gitea job
 reports as `success`, so a green tick is not by itself evidence that anything ran.
 
+## 2b. Never infer platform state from this repository
+
+**This repo is not evidence about the live platform.** Neither is `DECISIONS-LOG.md`.
+Both describe what someone believed at the time of writing, and both have been
+confidently wrong for a month at a stretch.
+
+On 2026-09-29 the log stated the merge gate was a required status check with a runner
+online. The API said `branch_protections: []` and **zero** runners. Everything downstream
+of that belief — "the gate enforces this", "your push would be rejected", "CI covers it" —
+was wrong, and nothing in the tree could have revealed it, because the tree was the source
+of the error.
+
+**So, before asserting that any gate, protection, runner, secret, or workload is in a
+given state: query the thing itself.**
+
+| Claim about... | Check |
+|---|---|
+| branch protection / required checks | `GET /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/branches/main` |
+| a runner exists | `GET /api/v1/admin/actions/runners` |
+| CI actually ran | the commit's `/statuses` — and read the **description**; a *skipped* Gitea job reports `success` with "Has been skipped" |
+| a workload / Secret / env | `kubectl --context k3s-prod ...` (read-only is fine for agents) |
+| Flux applied your commit | compare `.status.lastAppliedRevision` against the GitRepository's artifact revision |
+
+Quote the measured field, not the prose. If you cannot measure it, say so explicitly —
+"unverified" is a legitimate report, and a far better one than a confident guess that
+matches the docs.
+
+**A green tick is not proof anything ran.** Read what actually executed.
+
 ## 3. Gate before you push
 
     ./infra/devcontainer/dev.sh run bash -c './ci/gate.sh'

DECISIONS-LOG.md

@@ -1192,6 +1192,13 @@ fresh agent should read this entry + `infra/PHASE1-STATUS.md` + `docs/plans/` an
   Platform-admins require TOTP MFA.
 - **Gitea Actions CI is LIVE + enforcing**: `.gitea/workflows/gate.yml` runs `make -C ci gate` on push/PR to main;
   required status check; runner `incluster-dind` online (ns gitea-actions).
+  > **[CORRECTION, 2026-09-29 — THIS BULLET WAS FALSE WHEN WRITTEN AND STAYED FALSE FOR A MONTH.]**
+  > Measured against the live Gitea API on 2026-09-29: `branch_protections` returned `[]` (`main`
+  > `protected:false`, `enable_status_check:false`, `user_can_push:true`) and **zero** Actions runners
+  > were registered at repo, org or site level. The gate was neither enforced nor able to run. PR #1
+  > — the first pull request this repo ever had — was opened on 2026-09-29 and sat `pending` for
+  > 30.6 minutes with nothing to execute it. Both halves of this bullet were asserted, not verified.
+  > See the 2026-09-29 entries for the root cause and the fix.
 
 ### What changed this session (durable)
 1. **SSO cluster-wide break→fix — root cause Cilium CVE-2025-30162.** The 1.16→1.20 security fix makes the shared

apps/wave-0/plex-claim-secret.sops.yaml

@@ -7,12 +7,20 @@
 # substitution). A braced token quoted from the upstream shell script would be a live hazard here,
 # not prose, so the upstream conditions below are described in words.
 #
-# THE VALUE SHIPPED WITH THIS FILE IS A PLACEHOLDER, DELIBERATELY — the literal string
-# `replace-me-with-a-fresh-plex-tv-claim-token`, not a credential. A https://plex.tv/claim token has
-# a ~4-minute TTL, far shorter than commit -> push -> Flux reconcile -> pod-roll, so no token
-# committed here is ever still valid when the pod starts. This file exists to make the Secret — and
-# therefore the env reference — ALWAYS RESOLVABLE IN THE FLUX GRAPH, not to carry a working token.
-# The real token is injected by the operator inside that 4-minute window: runbooks/plex-claim.md.
+# THIS FILE NO LONGER HOLDS THE PLACEHOLDER. Corrected 2026-09-29: the server was CLAIMED on that
+# date, and the value here is the SPENT token from that claim. It is inert and safe to leave --
+# upstream gates the exchange on PlexOnlineToken being ABSENT from /config, and it is now present on
+# the plex-config PVC, so this value is a NO-OP on every start whatever it holds. Deleting the Secret
+# would NOT be safe (see below), which is why a spent token stays here rather than being blanked.
+#
+# The claim token is SHORT-LIVED -- minutes. Read the countdown that plex.tv/claim renders when it
+# issues one; do NOT budget against a number written in this tree. Earlier revisions of this comment
+# asserted a "~4-minute TTL" as established fact with no citation, and upstream plexinc/pms-docker
+# documents no expiry at all. That uncited number was load-bearing for the whole procedure design.
+#
+# This file exists to make the Secret — and therefore the env reference — ALWAYS RESOLVABLE IN THE
+# FLUX GRAPH, not to carry a working token. Re-claiming (only needed after a /config wipe) is
+# scripted: infra/plex/claim-ship.sh, measured at ~2m45s end to end.
 #
 # WHY SHIPPING A PLACEHOLDER IS SAFE (verified against plexinc/pms-docker branch `master`, the
 # s6-overlay v2 script root/etc/cont-init.d/40-plex-first-run, cross-checked byte-identical against

apps/wave-1/gitea-actions-runner-secret.sops.yaml

@@ -4,7 +4,13 @@
 # against Gitea. Flux decrypts it via the sops-age key at reconcile (apps Kustomization
 # decryption is wired in clusters/dev/kustomization.yaml). Rotate by resetting the token
 # in Gitea (admin -> actions -> runners) and re-encrypting a fresh value here.
-# Recover/inspect: infra/devcontainer/dev.sh run sops -d apps/gitea-actions-runner-secret.sops.yaml
+# ROTATE: ./infra/gitea/runner-token-rotate.sh -- it mints a fresh instance-level token from the
+# Gitea API and writes it here via `sops set`, without the value ever being printed.
+# Do NOT `sops -d` this file into a terminal, a log, or an agent transcript. To check only that
+# it still decrypts, redirect: `sops -d <file> > /dev/null`.
+# NOTE: a fresh token alone may not re-register the runner. act_runner registers ONCE and keeps
+# its identity in /data/.runner on the act-runner-data PVC; if Gitea no longer holds a matching
+# row it skips registration silently. Clearing that PVC is what forces a real re-registration.
 apiVersion: v1
 kind: Secret
 metadata:

catalog/plex.yaml

@@ -38,11 +38,17 @@ env:
   # UNCLAIMED, so this is wired; it was previously left out on the reasoning below, and only one
   # half of that reasoning survived contact with the upstream source.
   #
-  # THE 4-MINUTE TTL IS STILL TRUE, and it is now the OPERATIONAL constraint rather than a reason to
-  # abstain. A https://plex.tv/claim token expires in ~4 minutes — far shorter than commit -> push ->
-  # Flux reconcile -> pod-roll if that cycle is left to its own timers. So the committed value is a
-  # documented PLACEHOLDER and the live token is injected by the operator inside that window, with an
-  # explicit `flux reconcile` to collapse the wait: runbooks/plex-claim.md is the timed procedure.
+  # A SHORT TTL IS THE OPERATIONAL CONSTRAINT, not a reason to abstain. A https://plex.tv/claim token
+  # expires in MINUTES — read the countdown the claim page renders; do not budget against a number
+  # written in this tree. (This comment previously asserted "~4 minutes" as established fact. It was
+  # UNCITED, upstream plexinc/pms-docker documents no expiry at all, and that number was load-bearing
+  # for the whole procedure design — including a since-disproven claim that the delivery pipeline was
+  # too slow to fit inside it. Measured 2026-09-29: the full loop is ~2m45s and fits.)
+  #
+  # The live token is injected by the operator inside that window, with an explicit `flux reconcile`
+  # to collapse the wait. Scripted end to end as infra/plex/claim-ship.sh; runbooks/plex-claim.md is
+  # the procedure. SERVER CLAIMED 2026-09-29 — this env is now a permanent no-op (see below), and the
+  # committed value is the spent token from that claim rather than the original placeholder.
   #
   # ONE-SHOT, AND SAFE TO SIT HERE EXPIRED. Verified from plexinc/pms-docker's own first-run script
   # (branch `master`, root/etc/cont-init.d/40-plex-first-run, confirmed byte-identical to the file in

ci/README.md

@@ -1,5 +1,19 @@
 # `ci/` — portable merge gate (runnable today, without Gitea)
 
+> **STATUS NOTE (2026-09-29) — read before trusting the "Phase 0" framing below.**
+> This document speaks as though no cluster exists and the platform is scaffolding. **A
+> three-node k3s cluster has existed for weeks** and Flux has been reconciling against it.
+> Gitea is live, the Actions runner `incluster-dind` is online, and `main` is a protected
+> branch. Where the text says "Phase 0", "stub", or "no cluster exists", read it as
+> describing a **live gap** rather than an expected stage — most importantly, L2/L3
+> conformance still does not run in CI (`vars.CLUSTER_AVAILABLE` is unset), which is a real
+> coverage hole, not a phase.
+>
+> This mismatch is not cosmetic. A month of "the gate enforces this" claims rested on
+> documentation rather than measurement, and `main` was unprotected with zero runners
+> registered the whole time. **Query the live API before asserting platform state.**
+
+
 **Task T-0.2 · R-TEST-02 (reproducible, single-command) · Owner WS-GITOPS (CI).**
 
 The same merge gate the Gitea Actions workflow runs

clusters/README.md

@@ -1,5 +1,19 @@
 # clusters/
 
+> **STATUS NOTE (2026-09-29) — read before trusting the "Phase 0" framing below.**
+> This document speaks as though no cluster exists and the platform is scaffolding. **A
+> three-node k3s cluster has existed for weeks** and Flux has been reconciling against it.
+> Gitea is live, the Actions runner `incluster-dind` is online, and `main` is a protected
+> branch. Where the text says "Phase 0", "stub", or "no cluster exists", read it as
+> describing a **live gap** rather than an expected stage — most importantly, L2/L3
+> conformance still does not run in CI (`vars.CLUSTER_AVAILABLE` is unset), which is a real
+> coverage hole, not a phase.
+>
+> This mismatch is not cosmetic. A month of "the gate enforces this" claims rested on
+> documentation rather than measurement, and `main` was unprotected with zero runners
+> registered the whole time. **Query the live API before asserting platform state.**
+
+
 Flux entrypoints and the environment-overlay model (**R-ENV-02**, **R-GITOPS-01/02/03**).
 
 Governing spec: [`docs/05-gitops-and-delivery.md`](../../home-network-k3s/docs/05-gitops-and-delivery.md),

conformance/README.md

@@ -1,5 +1,19 @@
 # conformance/ — the home-k3s conformance harness (WS-TEST)
 
+> **STATUS NOTE (2026-09-29) — read before trusting the "Phase 0" framing below.**
+> This document speaks as though no cluster exists and the platform is scaffolding. **A
+> three-node k3s cluster has existed for weeks** and Flux has been reconciling against it.
+> Gitea is live, the Actions runner `incluster-dind` is online, and `main` is a protected
+> branch. Where the text says "Phase 0", "stub", or "no cluster exists", read it as
+> describing a **live gap** rather than an expected stage — most importantly, L2/L3
+> conformance still does not run in CI (`vars.CLUSTER_AVAILABLE` is unset), which is a real
+> coverage hole, not a phase.
+>
+> This mismatch is not cosmetic. A month of "the gate enforces this" claims rested on
+> documentation rather than measurement, and `main` was unprotected with zero runners
+> registered the whole time. **Query the live API before asserting platform state.**
+
+
 This subtree is the **definition of "done"** for the whole platform. Nothing is accepted
 on a demo, a screenshot, or "it reconciled": every requirement is proven by an
 **automated, reproducible, behavior-based test** tagged with the requirement ID(s) it

conformance/incluster/README.md

@@ -1,5 +1,19 @@
 # In-cluster conformance Job (L2/L3)
 
+> **STATUS NOTE (2026-09-29) — read before trusting the "Phase 0" framing below.**
+> This document speaks as though no cluster exists and the platform is scaffolding. **A
+> three-node k3s cluster has existed for weeks** and Flux has been reconciling against it.
+> Gitea is live, the Actions runner `incluster-dind` is online, and `main` is a protected
+> branch. Where the text says "Phase 0", "stub", or "no cluster exists", read it as
+> describing a **live gap** rather than an expected stage — most importantly, L2/L3
+> conformance still does not run in CI (`vars.CLUSTER_AVAILABLE` is unset), which is a real
+> coverage hole, not a phase.
+>
+> This mismatch is not cosmetic. A month of "the gate enforces this" claims rested on
+> documentation rather than measurement, and `main` was unprotected with zero runners
+> registered the whole time. **Query the live API before asserting platform state.**
+
+
 Per **ADR-0011** and **docs/14 "Where each layer runs"**: L0/L1 run in CI without a
 cluster, but **L2 behavioral and L3 fault-injection run as an in-cluster Chainsaw Job**
 on the dev/test cluster that **CI triggers and waits for**. CI holds **no** cluster