fix(renovate): document and probe the five token scopes Renovate needs; lint daemon-bound actions #85
No files matched your search
@@ -60,9 +60,21 @@
|
||||
# entry's "What I did NOT verify" — that gap is stated, not papered over.
|
||||
#
|
||||
# OPERATOR PREREQUISITE — ONE SECRET, NOT COMMITTED HERE:
|
||||
# `RENOVATE_TOKEN` — a Gitea access token for the bot account, scopes `write:repository`,
|
||||
# `read:user` and (since 2026-10-29) `read:package`. Set it as an Actions secret on this
|
||||
# repository. Nothing in this repo mints,
|
||||
# `RENOVATE_TOKEN` — a Gitea access token for the bot account (`renovate-bot`) with FIVE scopes.
|
||||
# Each is required by a call Renovate 44.x makes against Gitea 1.24.3, and Gitea refuses a
|
||||
# token missing one with `403 token does not have at least one of required scope(s)`:
|
||||
# read:user GET /user (platform init: initPlatform)
|
||||
# read:organization GET /orgs/{owner}, /orgs/{o}/labels (initRepo -> isOrg, then org labels)
|
||||
# write:repository clone/push branches, /pulls, /statuses
|
||||
# write:issue /issues, /labels, /issues/{n}/labels (dependency dashboard, PR labels;
|
||||
# Gitea files all of these under the ISSUE scope, not repository)
|
||||
# read:package the Gitea container registry (RENOVATE_HOST_RULES below)
|
||||
# CORRECTED 2026-10-30. This list used to name only write:repository + read:user (+ read:package),
|
||||
# and the operator minted exactly that. Run 350 then failed at
|
||||
# `GET /api/v1/orgs/Home-Network 403 ... required=[read:organization], token scope=read:package,
|
||||
# write:repository,read:user`; write:issue would have been the next wall. The preflight below now
|
||||
# PROBES these scopes, so a short token fails in seconds with the missing scope named.
|
||||
# Set it as an Actions secret on this repository. Nothing in this repo mints,
|
||||
# stores or references its value; it is consumed by name only.
|
||||
# Until it exists, this workflow FAILS LOUDLY on every scheduled run. That is intended: a
|
||||
# visible red is the correct state for "automation configured but not credentialed".
|
||||
@@ -161,10 +173,10 @@ jobs:
|
||||
That is the failure mode that let renovate.json sit inert in this repo for months while
|
||||
seven files claimed "Renovate maintains this pin".
|
||||
|
||||
TO FIX: create a Gitea access token for the bot account with scopes
|
||||
`write:repository`, `read:user` and `read:package` (the last one lets Renovate read
|
||||
this repo's own images in the Gitea registry), then add it to this repository as the
|
||||
Actions secret RENOVATE_TOKEN. Do not commit it anywhere.
|
||||
TO FIX: create a Gitea access token for the bot account (renovate-bot) with scopes
|
||||
read:user, read:organization, write:repository, write:issue and read:package (the
|
||||
header of .gitea/workflows/renovate.yaml says which call needs which), then add it to
|
||||
this repository as the Actions secret RENOVATE_TOKEN. Do not commit it anywhere.
|
||||
MSG
|
||||
exit 1
|
||||
fi
|
||||
@@ -172,6 +184,75 @@ jobs:
|
||||
# Proves the step is running INSIDE the pinned Renovate image, not the default job image.
|
||||
echo "renovate $(renovate --version)"
|
||||
|
||||
- name: Preflight - the token has every scope Renovate needs
|
||||
shell: bash
|
||||
env:
|
||||
RENOVATE_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.RENOVATE_TOKEN }}
|
||||
# ADDED 2026-10-30. Renovate reports EVERY platform-init failure as the bare
|
||||
# "Authentication failure" (lib/modules/platform/gitea/index.ts initPlatform swallows the
|
||||
# HTTP error), and a later scope gap surfaces as "Repository has unknown error". Two
|
||||
# dispatches were spent learning one missing scope at a time. These probes are GETs only,
|
||||
# and they name the missing scope. The token never reaches argv: curl reads it from stdin
|
||||
# (`--config -`), so it is not in `ps` output or in the log.
|
||||
run: |
|
||||
set -uo pipefail
|
||||
GITEA=https://gitea.home.keithjackson.dev
|
||||
REPO=Home-Network/home-network-k3s-impl
|
||||
fail=0
|
||||
body=$(mktemp)
|
||||
probe() { # <scope it proves> <path> <auth: bearer|basic>
|
||||
local code
|
||||
if [ "$3" = basic ]; then
|
||||
code=$(printf 'user = "renovate:%s"\n' "$RENOVATE_TOKEN" \
|
||||
| curl -sS --config - -o "$body" -w '%{http_code}' "$GITEA$2") || code=000
|
||||
else
|
||||
code=$(printf 'header = "Authorization: Bearer %s"\n' "$RENOVATE_TOKEN" \
|
||||
| curl -sS --config - -o "$body" -w '%{http_code}' "$GITEA$2") || code=000
|
||||
fi
|
||||
if [ "$code" = 200 ]; then
|
||||
echo "ok $1 (GET ${2%%\?*} -> 200)"
|
||||
return
|
||||
fi
|
||||
fail=1
|
||||
echo "::error::scope $1: GET ${2%%\?*} -> $code"
|
||||
case "$code" in
|
||||
401) echo " 401 = Gitea rejected the token VALUE (wrong, expired or revoked)." ;;
|
||||
403) if grep -q 'Access denied' "$body"; then
|
||||
echo " 403 'Access denied' = a Cilium/Envoy policy denial, not Gitea."
|
||||
else
|
||||
echo " Gitea: $(jq -r '.message // empty' "$body" 2>/dev/null | head -c 300)"
|
||||
fi ;;
|
||||
*) echo " body: $(head -c 200 "$body")" ;;
|
||||
esac
|
||||
}
|
||||
probe read:user "/api/v1/user" bearer
|
||||
probe read:organization "/api/v1/orgs/${REPO%%/*}" bearer
|
||||
probe read:repository "/api/v1/repos/$REPO" bearer
|
||||
probe read:issue "/api/v1/repos/$REPO/labels?limit=1" bearer
|
||||
probe read:package "/v2/token?service=container_registry&scope=repository:home-network/toolbox:pull" basic
|
||||
# WRITE scopes cannot be proven by a GET. Gitea's scope-refusal message, however, lists
|
||||
# the token's scopes (names only, never the value): ask for an admin route this bot
|
||||
# cannot have, and read `token scope=` from the 403. Advisory if the format changes.
|
||||
printf 'header = "Authorization: Bearer %s"\n' "$RENOVATE_TOKEN" \
|
||||
| curl -sS --config - -o "$body" "$GITEA/api/v1/admin/orgs?limit=1" || true
|
||||
scopes=$(jq -r '.message // empty' "$body" 2>/dev/null | sed -n 's/.*token scope=//p')
|
||||
if [ -n "$scopes" ]; then
|
||||
echo "token scopes (from Gitea): $scopes"
|
||||
for want in write:repository write:issue; do
|
||||
case ",$scopes," in
|
||||
*",$want,"*|*",all,"*) echo "ok $want" ;;
|
||||
*) echo "::error::scope $want is missing (token scope=$scopes)"; fail=1 ;;
|
||||
esac
|
||||
done
|
||||
else
|
||||
echo "::warning::could not read the token's scope list; write:repository and write:issue are UNVERIFIED"
|
||||
fi
|
||||
rm -f "$body"
|
||||
if [ "$fail" -ne 0 ]; then
|
||||
echo "::error::RENOVATE_TOKEN failed the checks above (a 401 is the value, a 403 is a scope). Re-mint it for renovate-bot with read:user, read:organization, write:repository, write:issue, read:package and overwrite the secret."
|
||||
exit 1
|
||||
fi
|
||||
|
||||
- name: Run Renovate
|
||||
shell: bash
|
||||
# The repo config is discovered by Renovate from the cloned repo (renovate.json5,
|
||||
|
||||
+16
@@ -42,3 +42,19 @@ while IFS=: read -r wf _ value; do
|
||||
done < <(grep -nE '^[[:space:]]*configurationFile:' .gitea/workflows/*.y*ml 2>/dev/null || true)
|
||||
[ "$missing" -eq 0 ] || exit 1
|
||||
ok "workflow configurationFile references resolve"
|
||||
|
||||
# A workflow must not use an action that needs a Docker daemon: jobs on this runner get NONE, by
|
||||
# decision (decisions/2026-10-29-image-pipeline.md; act_runner maps docker_host to `-`). Such an
|
||||
# action is valid YAML and passes every other stage, then dies at runtime with
|
||||
# "failed to connect to the docker API at unix:///var/run/docker.sock". renovatebot/github-action
|
||||
# did exactly that on every Renovate run until 2026-10-30 (run 343). Run the tool's image as the
|
||||
# job `container:` instead (see .gitea/workflows/renovate.yaml). Container (`docker://`) actions
|
||||
# and Docker's own daemon-bound actions are rejected for the same reason. Comments are ignored.
|
||||
daemon_uses='uses:[[:space:]]*["'\'']?(docker://|renovatebot/github-action|docker/(build-push|setup-buildx|setup-qemu|login)-action)'
|
||||
bad=0
|
||||
while IFS= read -r hit; do
|
||||
err "${hit%%:*}: needs a Docker daemon, which jobs here do not get: $(echo "${hit#*:*:}" | sed -E 's/^[[:space:]]+//')"
|
||||
bad=1
|
||||
done < <(grep -HnE "^[^#]*${daemon_uses}" .gitea/workflows/*.y*ml 2>/dev/null || true)
|
||||
[ "$bad" -eq 0 ] || exit 1
|
||||
ok "no workflow uses a Docker-daemon-bound action"
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,108 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
date: 2026-10-30
|
||||
branch: fix/renovate-auth
|
||||
title: Renovate's token needs five scopes, not three; the workflow documented the wrong list, and now probes it
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## What changed
|
||||
|
||||
**The fix is operator-side.** `RENOVATE_TOKEN` lacks `read:organization`, and it will next lack
|
||||
`write:issue`. The operator must re-mint it with five scopes:
|
||||
|
||||
- `read:user`
|
||||
- `read:organization`
|
||||
- `write:repository`
|
||||
- `write:issue`
|
||||
- `read:package`
|
||||
|
||||
The git half fixes the two things that sent the operator round this loop twice.
|
||||
|
||||
**`.gitea/workflows/renovate.yaml`**:
|
||||
- **The header's scope list is corrected**, with the call each scope serves. The old list named
|
||||
only `write:repository`, `read:user` and `read:package`, and the operator minted exactly that.
|
||||
The preflight's "TO FIX" text is corrected the same way.
|
||||
- **A new step, "Preflight - the token has every scope Renovate needs".**
|
||||
- It probes read-only GETs: `/user` for read:user, `/orgs/Home-Network` for read:organization,
|
||||
`/repos/{repo}` for read:repository, `/repos/{repo}/labels` for read:issue, and registry
|
||||
`/v2/token` for read:package.
|
||||
- It reads the token's own scope list out of Gitea's 403 from `/admin/orgs` (names only), and
|
||||
requires `write:repository` and `write:issue` in it.
|
||||
- It says what a failure means: 401 is the value; a Gitea 403 is a scope, and the probe prints
|
||||
Gitea's message; an "Access denied" 403 is a Cilium/Envoy denial.
|
||||
- The token is fed to curl on stdin (`--config -`), never in argv.
|
||||
|
||||
**`ci/lint.sh`**: a new guard rejects any non-comment `uses:` in `.gitea/workflows` that needs a
|
||||
Docker daemon: `docker://`, `renovatebot/github-action` and Docker's daemon-bound
|
||||
`docker/*-action`s. That is the class of bug fixed in #84.
|
||||
|
||||
### Root cause, with evidence
|
||||
|
||||
Run 350 (task 567, 06:49 UTC) **got further than 348 and 349.** Gitea's router log, filtered to
|
||||
the act-runner pod `10.0.0.38`:
|
||||
|
||||
06:49:31 GET /api/v1/user 200 OK
|
||||
06:49:31 GET /api/v1/version 200 OK
|
||||
06:49:31 GET /api/v1/repos/Home-Network/home-network-k3s-impl 200 OK
|
||||
06:49:31 GET /api/v1/orgs/Home-Network 403 Forbidden
|
||||
|
||||
There were no `/v2/` requests: Renovate stopped before extraction. From the job log, verbatim:
|
||||
|
||||
ERROR: Repository has unknown error (repository=Home-Network/home-network-k3s-impl)
|
||||
"url": "https://gitea.home.keithjackson.dev/api/v1/orgs/Home-Network",
|
||||
"message": "token does not have at least one of required scope(s), required=[read:organization], token scope=read:package,write:repository,read:user"
|
||||
"x-envoy-upstream-service-time": "27", "server": "envoy"
|
||||
INFO: Repository finished ... "result": "unknown-error", "exitCode": 8
|
||||
|
||||
**This is not Cilium.** The body is Gitea's JSON scope message, Gitea logged the request, and
|
||||
`x-envoy-upstream-service-time` shows that Envoy forwarded it upstream.
|
||||
|
||||
**The secret WAS updated.** Runs 348 and 349 got `GET /user 403` from `tokenRequiresScopes`. Run 350
|
||||
got `/user 200`, and its token scope list now includes `read:user`.
|
||||
|
||||
**Why `read:organization` is needed.** Renovate 44.167.0, `lib/modules/platform/gitea/index.ts`
|
||||
`initRepo`, calls `helper.isOrg` → `GET /orgs/{owner}` and rethrows on error. Gitea 1.24.3,
|
||||
`routers/api/v1/api.go`, puts `/orgs/{org}` behind
|
||||
`tokenRequiresScopes(AccessTokenScopeCategoryOrganization)`.
|
||||
|
||||
**Why `write:issue` is needed next.** In the same `api.go`, `/repos/{o}/{r}/issues…`, `/labels`
|
||||
and `/milestones` sit in a group with `tokenRequiresScopes(AccessTokenScopeCategoryIssue)`
|
||||
(lines 1466–1582). Renovate's gitea-helper uses `/issues`, `/issues/{n}/labels`, `/labels` and
|
||||
`/issues/{n}/comments`, for the dependency dashboard (`:dependencyDashboard` is extended) and for
|
||||
PR labels. A dry run only reads them; a scheduled run writes them.
|
||||
|
||||
The other causes the coordinator listed are ruled out:
|
||||
- **Schedule window and dry-run.** The run never reached branch processing.
|
||||
- **Repository config.** The run never reached the clone (`"cloned": undefined`).
|
||||
- **The Summary step.** It is not involved; the failure is Renovate's own exit 8.
|
||||
|
||||
## What I verified
|
||||
|
||||
- I read the whole run 350 job log (204 lines), and the router lines above. Runs 348 and 349 are
|
||||
as recorded in `decisions/2026-10-30-renovate-first-run.md`'s follow-up: `/user` got 403 from
|
||||
`tokenRequiresScopes`.
|
||||
- **The probe step, in the pinned image.** I extracted the step body from the YAML and ran it in
|
||||
`ghcr.io/renovatebot/renovate:44.167.0` (`curl` 8.5.0 and `jq` are present) with a deliberately
|
||||
**bogus** token. Every probe reported 401 with the "token VALUE" diagnosis, the scope-list read
|
||||
fell back to a warning, and the step exited 1.
|
||||
- **The scope-list parser.** Against run 350's exact message format it reports `write:issue`
|
||||
MISSING. Against a five-scope list it reports both OK. Against `all` it reports both OK.
|
||||
- **The lint guard.** It flags `renovatebot/github-action` in the pre-#84 `renovate.yaml`
|
||||
(dfc432c, line 152). It reports nothing on the current workflows, and it ignores commented
|
||||
lines. `bash -n ci/lint.sh` passes.
|
||||
- **Account facts, read-only.** `renovate-bot` is a collaborator with `write`, and the org is
|
||||
public.
|
||||
|
||||
## What I did NOT verify
|
||||
|
||||
- **The probe with a real token. UNVERIFIED.** I never had the token. In particular, I have not
|
||||
observed that `GET /api/v1/admin/orgs` gives renovate-bot's token a 403 with a `token scope=`
|
||||
list. The source says the scope check runs before `reqSiteAdmin`. If the message format
|
||||
differs, the step warns and does not fail.
|
||||
- **That five scopes are enough for a full non-dry run.** They cover every helper endpoint Renovate
|
||||
44.167.0 calls, mapped to Gitea 1.24.3's route categories by reading source. Branch pushes go
|
||||
over git-over-HTTPS with the token; I believe that needs write:repository, but I have not
|
||||
observed it.
|
||||
- **Registry reads as renovate-bot.** `read:package` on a public org is expected to work. The new
|
||||
probe is the first real test of it.
|
||||
- **Sensitive paths.** `.gitea/**` and `ci/**` are both sensitive. CI's `approval-policy` will block
|
||||
until the operator posts `/approve-override` as a PR review.
|
||||
Reference in new issue
Block a user