Files
home-network-k3s-impl/platform/vpn-ingress/README.md
T
jakman85andClaude Opus 5 e35612dc7e
gate / gate (pull_request) Failing after 1m51s
gate / conformance (pull_request) Has been skipped
fix(vpn-ingress): keep the server key in source through SOPS, not as an out-of-band Secret
Operator correction: secrets are kept in source through sops. #55 shipped the
WireGuard server private key as a Secret to `kubectl create` by hand. Two real
costs, not just a convention break:

  * R-SEC-01 / spec docs/07 -- secrets live in source, SOPS-encrypted, and
    reach the cluster only through Flux.
  * It broke DR for the one credential that cannot be re-derived. A rebuild
    restores everything in git; it does not restore a hand-made Secret, and
    losing this key means re-enrolling EVERY device, because each client
    profile pins its public half. #55 papered over that with "keep a copy in
    your password manager".

(Note secret-provenance did NOT forbid the original shape -- it scopes to
app-namespace=true and vpn-ingress is deliberately a platform namespace. The
rule broken was the written requirement, not an enforced control.)

An agent still must not mint a long-lived private key (CLAUDE.md §6), so the
file is committed ALREADY ENCRYPTED with `privatekey: REPLACE-ME`. That makes
the wiring complete and green from the first commit -- resource line plus both
overlay decryption patches -- leaving the operator exactly one act: replace the
value. A commented-out resource to uncomment later is the "in git, no generator
entry, reviewed, merged, still broken" shape this repo keeps hitting.

The init guard is now a validation rather than an emptiness check: the value is
piped through `wg pubkey`, which accepts only a real curve25519 private key, and
the pod names which case it hit -- placeholder, empty, mangled, or (the silent
one) still `ENC[` ciphertext because an overlay is missing its decryption patch,
which otherwise applies cleanly with every Flux condition green.

Second, independent finding that also fixes #55's step 2: `wg` is on the HOST
only and `sops` is in the CONTAINER only, so `sops -d | wg pubkey` cannot run in
one shell -- the command #55 documented could not have worked. Every step is now
split by where it runs, and the written key is verified by comparing sha256
digests rather than printing anything. `qrencode` is on neither, so the QR step
says so and gives the install command.

Touches clusters/** and adds a **/*.sops.yaml, so approval-policy will block
pending the operator's /approve-override. Deliberately not posted by me.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <[email protected]>
2026-10-05 23:55:29 -05:00

212 lines
15 KiB
Markdown
Raw Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters
This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.
# platform/vpn-ingress — WireGuard remote access (north-south INGRESS)
Lets the operator's own devices — Android, Linux, Windows, macOS, iOS — dial in from anywhere on
the internet and behave as though plugged into the home LAN: full reach to `192.168.2.0/24` and
egress out the house WAN.
> **This is not `platform/vpn-egress`.** They are opposite directions and share nothing but the
> word "VPN". `vpn-egress` pushes *pods out* to the internet through a PIA tunnel (ADR-0015,
> R-NET-05/06/07). This component lets *remote clients in*. Changing one never affects the other.
| | |
|---|---|
| Transport | WireGuard, **udp/51820**, kernel implementation |
| Where it runs | `hostNetwork` **DaemonSet** — one warm listener on every node |
| Client subnet | `${WG_CLIENT_CIDR}` = `10.90.0.0/24`; `.1` is the server, `.2`–`.254` devices |
| Authorisation | a device's **public key** is in [`peers.yaml`](./peers.yaml), or it cannot connect |
| The one secret | the server's private key — **SOPS-encrypted in this tree**, `wg-server-key.sops.yaml` |
| Exposure | one hand-made WAN port-forward on the SOHO router, off-repo |
| Enrolling a device | [`infra/vpn-ingress/new-peer.sh`](../../infra/vpn-ingress/new-peer.sh) |
| Procedure / bring-up | [`runbooks/vpn-remote-access.md`](../../runbooks/vpn-remote-access.md) |
## Why WireGuard
The requirement names four client platforms. WireGuard is the only option that has a *first-party*
client on all of them (official apps for Android, iOS, Windows and macOS; in-kernel on Linux since
5.6, so a Linux client needs no userspace daemon at all). It is also the smallest thing to expose:
one UDP port, no cipher negotiation, no PKI, no user database, no TLS stack.
OpenVPN would have needed a CA, per-device certificates and a revocation list — three pieces of
long-lived state this repo would then have to protect and rotate. IKEv2/IPsec has native clients but
is painful to run in a container and brittle behind double NAT. Neither buys anything here.
### Why this is safe to expose to the whole internet
The honest answer is not "because it is encrypted" — it is the handshake's failure mode:
**An unauthenticated packet gets no reply at all.** WireGuard's first handshake message carries a
MAC keyed with the *responder's own public key*. If the sender does not already know it, the packet
is dropped silently — no error, no reset, no banner, nothing a scanner can fingerprint. From the
outside, udp/51820 is indistinguishable from a closed port. There is no login prompt to brute-force,
no version string to match against a CVE, and no amplification to abuse.
That is the whole security argument, and it is why the exposed port carries no IP allowlist (which
would also have made roaming clients unusable — a phone's address changes with every cell tower).
Compare `apps/wave-0/pihole-dns.yaml`, which *does* pin `loadBalancerSourceRanges` to the LAN: a
resolver answers anybody, so it must be scoped by address. WireGuard answers nobody.
What it does **not** protect against is a stolen device — anyone holding a device's private key
*is* that device. That is what revocation is for: delete the stanza, merge, done (~1 min).
## Architecture, and the one decision that drives everything
```
phone on 5G SOHO router k3s-prod-N (host netns)
┌──────────────┐ udp/51820 ┌───────────────┐ forward ┌────────────────────────────┐
│ WireGuard app│─────────────▶│ WAN 51820 ──▶ │───────────▶│ wg0 10.90.0.1/24 │
│ 10.90.0.2/32 │ over the │ node IP:51820 │ │ decrypt, then FORWARD │
└──────────────┘ internet └───────────────┘ │ SNAT to the node's addr │
└─────────────┬──────────────┘
│ as `host`/`remote-node`
┌─────────────────────────────────┼──────────────────────┐
▼ ▼ ▼
LAN 192.168.2.0/24 Gateway VIP .20 (16 web UIs) WAN / internet
(NAS, router, printers) PiHole DNS VIP .23
```
### `hostNetwork: true` is required, not convenient
This is the only genuinely interesting decision in the component, and it was forced by a *measured*
property of this cluster rather than chosen for convenience.
In Cilium, what a packet may reach is decided by the **security identity of its source**. A
WireGuard server running as an ordinary pod must SNAT client traffic to its own pod IP (Cilium drops
a packet whose source is not the endpoint's own address), so every remote client would have arrived
everywhere wearing *that pod's* identity. On 2026-10-04 this cluster measured what that costs
(`decisions/2026-10-04-plex-advertise-plexdirect.md`): a request to the shared Gateway VIP **from
inside a pod returns `403 Access denied` from Envoy for all 16 Gateway hostnames**, because Cilium's
Gateway preserves the original source identity and enforces the *destination's* ingress policy —
and every app admits `reserved:ingress` plus named peers, never an arbitrary pod. LAN browsers work
only because they arrive as `reserved:world` / `reserved:host`.
So the pod-networked version of this component would have produced a tunnel that came up healthy,
reported connected peers, routed packets — and 403'd **every single cluster web UI**: plex, gitea,
keycloak, nextcloud, grafana, headlamp, the apex. `*.home.keithjackson.dev` would not even have
resolved, because `apps/wave-0/pihole-dns.yaml`'s ingress policy deliberately omits the `cluster`
entity. A VPN that looks up and is useless is the worst available outcome, and nothing in the
manifests would have hinted at it.
In the **host** netns there is no pod identity to carry. Forwarded client traffic is SNATed to the
node's own address, so it reaches the Gateway, PiHole and every LAN host as `host`/`remote-node` —
byte-for-byte what a LAN client looks like. Three further problems vanish with it:
* `net.ipv4.ip_forward` is **already 1** on these nodes (`node_baseline` writes
`/etc/sysctl.d/99-k3s-cilium.conf`). It is *not* in the kubelet's safe-sysctl allowlist, so a
pod-netns build would have needed `--allowed-unsafe-sysctls` on all three kubelets — a
node-restart change to the k3s service, to run a VPN.
* **No LoadBalancer VIP**, so no `CiliumL2AnnouncementPolicy` lease lottery (the backend-blind
announcer that cost this LAN an 8-day Minecraft outage — see
`conformance/tests/l0-static/l2-announced-vips-serve-from-any-node`) and no
`externalTrafficPolicy` trade-off to make at all.
* **No double encapsulation.** Client UDP lands on the node's own NIC, so the underlay is a flat
1500-byte path, not Cilium's 1450-byte VXLAN. That is what makes `MTU = 1420` simply correct.
`hostNetwork` is *permitted* here, and not by oversight:
`platform/kyverno/policies/restrict-host-namespaces.yaml` matches `namespaceSelector:
app-namespace=true` only, and names this exact carve-out in its own comment — "platform components
that do … e.g. Cilium, node-exporter … live in platform namespaces that do NOT carry the
app-namespace label". [`namespace.yaml`](./namespace.yaml) is deliberately unlabelled.
**The cost, stated rather than buried:** a `hostNetwork` pod has no Cilium endpoint, so **no
NetworkPolicy constrains this workload** — not [`networkpolicy.yaml`](./networkpolicy.yaml), not
anything. That file says so at length instead of implying a protection it cannot provide. The
boundary around this port is WireGuard's peer authentication, full stop.
### Why a DaemonSet
The WAN forward names **one node address**, by hand, off-repo (same shape as the plex tcp/32400
forward). A single-replica Deployment would float on every reschedule and silently invalidate it.
A DaemonSet instead puts an identical listener on all three nodes — every node answers the same
keys — so **losing the forwarded node is a one-line router change**, with no cluster work and no
re-issued client profiles. The two idle listeners cost ~15 MiB each.
A pinned `LoadBalancer` VIP was the considered alternative (it would make the forward immune to node
replacement). Rejected: it reintroduces the L2-announcement lease, SNAT, and an extra node-to-node
hop into the one path whose failure mode is *"I am away from home and cannot get in"*. Fewer
translations win here.
### The split that keeps authorisation reviewable
| half | where | why |
|---|---|---|
| peer **public** keys + addresses | [`peers.yaml`](./peers.yaml), **plaintext in git** | a public key grants nothing by itself, and this makes *"who can get into my house"* a reviewable PR diff with `git log` as its audit trail |
| the server's **private** key | `wg-server-key.sops.yaml`, **SOPS-encrypted in git** | the only real secret (R-SEC-01, spec docs/07). Ships with a `REPLACE-ME` placeholder: an agent must not mint a long-lived private key (CLAUDE.md §6), so the operator `sops set`s it in |
The two are joined only at pod start, by the init container, into a **`medium: Memory` emptyDir** —
so the assembled config holding the private key never touches any node's disk and dies with the pod.
Both halves are therefore in git, which is the point: a cluster rebuild restores the server key with
everything else. An out-of-band `kubectl create secret` — the first shape this component shipped in,
corrected after review — would have put the one credential every enrolled device depends on *outside*
the GitOps tree, and losing it means re-enrolling every device, because each client profile pins this
key's public half.
Encrypting the peer register would have hidden exactly the change a reviewer most needs to see: a
new line granting a new device access to the whole LAN.
## What a client can reach — and how to narrow it
By design, **everything a LAN machine can reach**: all of `192.168.2.0/24`, the shared Gateway's 16
hostnames, PiHole, the NAS, the router's admin UI, and the internet via the house WAN.
**That includes the three k3s nodes themselves** — `192.168.2.10/.11/.12`, and therefore the
kube-apiserver on 6443, kubelet on 10250 and SSH on 22. An enrolled device is as privileged as a
machine sitting in the house, which is what "reach the entire local network" asks for; it is
recorded here because it is the largest consequence of saying yes to that, and because nobody should
discover it later. **It is also why a lost device must be revoked promptly** (delete its stanza,
merge; ~1 min to take effect).
To grant less, narrow it at the **client** profile first — `new-peer.sh --split` emits a
split-tunnel profile routing only the LAN and the tunnel subnet, so the device keeps its own
internet path. To enforce less *server-side*, add filtering to the `PostUp` chain in
[`daemonset.yaml`](./daemonset.yaml) (e.g. `iptables -A FORWARD -i wg0 -d 192.168.2.10 -j DROP`
before the accept rules) — the FORWARD chain there is the only enforcement point, since no
NetworkPolicy applies.
## Operating it
* **Enrol a device:** `./infra/vpn-ingress/new-peer.sh <name> <octet>` → paste the printed `[Peer]`
stanza into `peers.yaml` → PR → merge. Phones scan a QR code; desktops import a `.conf`.
* **Revoke a device:** delete its stanza → PR → merge. No other step; the key stops working.
* **Is it up?** `kubectl --context k3s-prod -n vpn-ingress get ds wireguard` — three Ready.
* **Who is connected?** `kubectl --context k3s-prod -n vpn-ingress exec ds/wireguard -- wg show`
(`latest handshake` under ~3 min means live). Never dump `wg showconf` — it prints the private key.
* **Full bring-up and verification:** `runbooks/vpn-remote-access.md`.
## Prerequisites outside this directory
1. **The `wireguard` kernel module on every node.** Added to `node_baseline_kernel_modules`
(`infra/ansible/roles/node_baseline/defaults/main.yml`); the operator runs the role. The pod has
`NET_ADMIN` but deliberately **not** `SYS_MODULE`, so it cannot load the module itself — it
CrashLoops with a clear `wg-quick` error instead of quietly degrading to userspace WireGuard.
2. **The server private key.** `wg-server-key.sops.yaml` is committed, encrypted, with a
`REPLACE-ME` placeholder, and both overlays already carry its decryption patch — so the wiring
is complete and the only outstanding act is replacing the value (runbook step 2). Until then the
DaemonSet CrashLoops with an explicit FATAL naming the file: the init container validates the
value with `wg pubkey`, which rejects the placeholder, an empty value, a public key pasted by
mistake, **and** a Secret that arrived as undecrypted `ENC[...]` ciphertext. That last case is
the one worth having a guard for — a missing overlay decryption patch applies cleanly and leaves
every Flux condition green.
3. **The WAN port-forward**, udp/51820 → one node address. Hand-made on the SOHO router, off-repo,
and the half CI can never check.
## Not built (deliberate, with reasons)
* **No metrics / no peer-level alerting.** A WireGuard exporter would expose
`wireguard_latest_handshake_seconds` per peer — genuinely useful for spotting unexpected
activity — but it needs a second `NET_ADMIN` container in the pod that terminates the
internet-facing tunnel, and that trade was not worth making unverified. Pod-down is already
covered generically by `KubeDeploymentReplicasMismatch`/`KubePodNotReady` from
kube-prometheus-stack. **This is the top follow-up.**
* **No preshared keys.** They would add a symmetric post-quantum hedge on top of the Noise
handshake — and would be a real secret, forcing `peers.yaml` into SOPS and costing the
reviewability above. Revisit only if the threat model changes; if it does, the PSK belongs in the
`wg-server-key` Secret.
* **No IPv6.** The server offers no IPv6 tunnel address, so a full-tunnel client with native IPv6
still reaches IPv6 sites *outside* the tunnel. Functionally harmless, a privacy leak if the point
was to hide the client's network. Fix is an `fd..` ULA on `wg0` plus `::/0` in the client's
`AllowedIPs`; not done because nothing here needs it.
* **No in-cluster-service reach beyond what the LAN has.** Clients reach cluster apps the way a LAN
browser does — through the Gateway VIP. Pod IPs and `10.43.0.0/16` service IPs are not routed
into the tunnel.