home-network-k3s-impl/conformance/tests

Conformance tests — layout & requirement-tagging convention

Every test is a Chainsaw Test in its own directory:

tests/
  l0-static/           L0 — whole-repo invariants over the tracked tree (no cluster)
  l1-rendering/        L1 — ServiceDefinition -> rendered resources match golden
  l2-behavioral/       L2 — real runtime behavior (probes against a cluster)
  l3-fault-injection/  L3 — break something; assert fail-closed / no-data-loss
  meta/                harness self-checks (R-TEST-*), cluster-independent
    <test-name>/chainsaw-test.yaml

The layer a test belongs to is its subtree and its .../layer annotation; the coverage generator cross-checks the two.

L0 static (l0-static/) — what belongs here, and what does not

docs/14's L0 row is "Pre-apply, in CI · manifests/ServiceDefinitions obey invariants". Kyverno (platform/kyverno/) covers the invariants expressible over a single resource. This subtree covers the L0 invariants that are properties of the repository as a whole and that no per-resource policy can state — e.g. no plaintext secret exists anywhere in the tracked tree, no tracked RoleBinding grants a workload identity a privileged role, the spec-immutability gate actually blocks a modified spec.

Each l0-static/<name>/ dir carries a check.sh: a self-contained offline assertion script (git + Python stdlib/PyYAML; no cluster, no network) that exits 0/1. It is executed:

• by conformance/run.sh --layer l0 (and as the offline leg of a full run), via lib/run_l1_offline.py, producing a REAL pass/fail JUnit entry — never a skip; and
• by the merge gate's ci/l0.sh stage, so these assertions run on every PR; and
• by the wrapping Chainsaw Test, which runs the SAME check.sh, so an in-cluster run executes byte-identical assertions.

Two authoring rules specific to this layer:

1. State the gap. A statically-provable half of a requirement is still only half. Every check.sh header ends with an explicit "what this does NOT prove" list naming the cluster-layer remainder. Covering a requirement at L0 does not finish it.
2. Exemptions must be self-policing. Where a check must tolerate something (a deliberately-plaintext policy fixture, an .example template), the exemption is conditioned on a property that would break if the exemption were abused — e.g. the plaintext Secret fixture is exempt only while a kyverno-test.yaml asserts the policy rejects it. Never a bare path allowlist.

Requirement-tagging convention (authoritative)

A test declares the requirement(s) it verifies three ways; the label is the source of truth, the annotations must agree with it (the coverage generator fails on drift):

metadata:
  name: default-deny
  labels:
    # ONE label per verified R-* ID. Machine-selectable + coverage source of truth.
    conformance.home.k3s/R-NET-01: "true"
  annotations:
    # Human-readable canonical list — MUST equal the label set.
    conformance.home.k3s/requirements: "R-NET-01"
    # Declared layer (L0|L1|L2|L3|META) — must match the subtree.
    conformance.home.k3s/layer: "L2"
    # true => R-TEST-05 requires this to be (or have) an L3 fault-injection test.
    conformance.home.k3s/safety-critical: "false"
    # Given/When/Then intent, for the coverage report and reviewers.
    conformance.home.k3s/intent: "Given ... When ... Then ..."

Why a label per requirement (not a comma list): Kubernetes label values can't hold a comma-separated list, and chainsaw test --selector selects on label keys/values. One conformance.home.k3s/<R-ID>=true label per requirement makes both subset-selection and coverage extraction exact and robust.

How this drives the tooling

• Subset runs (merge gate): run.sh --requirements R-NET-01,R-NET-06 resolves the R-IDs to the set of test dirs carrying those labels (union, deduped) and runs each once.
• Coverage (lib/coverage.py): reads these labels from every chainsaw-test.yaml, maps each registry requirement -> its verifying test(s), and flags gaps + any label/annotation mismatch + tags not in the registry.
• JUnit: results (real or skipped-scaffold) carry the R-IDs in classname + properties, so the JUnit itself stays traceable (R-TEST-04).

Authoring rules (R-TEST-01/02/06)

• Behavior, not existence. Assert what the system does (a probe cannot connect), never that an object merely exists (a policy can exist and not enforce).
• Given/When/Then structure with given-*/when-*/then-* step names.
• Hermetic & self-cleaning. Rely on Chainsaw's per-test namespace + auto-teardown; put any out-of-namespace fixture cleanup in a finally block. A leaked fixture is a failure.
• Bounded, deterministic waits. Use assert/error polling within the config timeouts; never sleep-and-hope.
• Safety-critical => fault-injection. For a safety-critical requirement, actually break the thing and assert fail-closed / no-data-loss, with finally restoring state.
• Never weaken a test to go green (R-TEST-06). If the spec can't be met, escalate to the PM — do not relax the assertion or the requirement.

Scaffolds in this tree carry TODO(T-x.y) markers where a fixture/assertion lands as a later roadmap phase delivers the capability under test. lib/status.py treats such a marker — in the chainsaw-test.yaml, in render-check.sh, or in check.sh — as outranking any conformance.home.k3s/executable: "true" annotation, so a placeholder body can never be reported as an executable test.