Pull request #117 is open from feat/pm-agent-pr-mentions for this issue.
The worker left no summary of its own; the pull request body and the decisions/
entry on the branch are the…
revise on feat/pm-agent-pr-mentions — the newest comment withdraws the continuation requirement, and that is a behaviour change to the branch rather than new work.
Taking your 05:32 comment…
Pull request #117 is open from feat/pm-agent-pr-mentions for this issue.
PR-mention trigger for the PM agent — built, tested offline, shipped off
The trigger-and-reply half of #116…
Thanks — that unblocks it. Your answer to (3) is the one that mattered: if the agent label was never a permissions boundary, then triggering on a mention isn't widening authorization, and I'll…
Holding this one for your input rather than starting a branch: the ask is to change the machinery that decides when the PM agent runs, and I don't think I should guess at that design. Two things…
Pull request #101 is open from docs/source-comment-audit for this issue.
Source-comment audit — recommended changes (read-only; no source file touched)
The audit you asked for is in…
Picking this up where it stopped: your clarification makes the ask bounded, so I'm dispatching a worker to do exactly the audit you asked for — a list of recommended changes, no edits to source…
Holding this for scoping rather than opening a branch — as written it's an unbounded sweep over the whole tree, and I'd be guessing at which comments you consider historical fluff versus…