Merge pull request 'docs(ci): the wiring comment named a secret Gitea cannot accept' (#21) from fix/gitea-settings-comment-names-impossible-secret into main

Reviewed-on: #21
Reviewed-by: Keith Jackson <[email protected]>

ci/gitea-settings.sh

@@ -42,9 +42,16 @@
 #      skip like spec-immutability's (UNDETERMINED, exit 3) rather than a hard block, so
 #      that an unwired credential cannot lock the repository.
 #
-# TO WIRE IT: create a Gitea repo secret GITEA_SETTINGS_TOKEN (a token that can read repo
+# TO WIRE IT: create a Gitea repo secret SETTINGS_API_TOKEN (a token that can read repo
 # settings) — infra/gitea/set-ci-token.sh does it. Until then this stage skips LOUDLY and
 # the drift it exists to catch is still undetected.
+#
+# NOT `GITEA_SETTINGS_TOKEN`. This comment named that until 2026-09-29 and it instructed the
+# reader to do something IMPOSSIBLE: Gitea reserves the `GITEA_` prefix for secret names and
+# rejects the PUT with HTTP 400 "invalid secret name". That is not a style rule — it is why the
+# detector sat inert for hours while a token existed and no secret did. The env var below still
+# accepts GITEA_SETTINGS_TOKEN, but only for a LOCAL run: it can never be the CI wiring, because
+# the secret that would feed it cannot be created at all.
 set -euo pipefail
 CI_DIR="$(cd "$(dirname "${BASH_SOURCE[0]}")" && pwd)"
 REPO_ROOT="$(cd "${CI_DIR}/.." && pwd)"