docs(ci): the wiring comment named a secret Gitea cannot accept

ci/gitea-settings.sh told the reader to "create a Gitea repo secret
GITEA_SETTINGS_TOKEN". That instruction is IMPOSSIBLE to follow: Gitea reserves the
GITEA_ prefix for secret names and rejects the PUT with HTTP 400 "invalid secret name".

Same defect as the one fixed in PR #15 and in the README in PR #19 -- this was the third
file carrying it, found by an agent reading the file rather than trusting my description
of it. A comment that instructs an impossible action is not cosmetic: this exact wrong
name is why the drift detector sat inert while a token existed and no secret did.

Now names SETTINGS_API_TOKEN, and states explicitly that GITEA_SETTINGS_TOKEN remains
honoured ONLY as a local-run env var -- it can never be the CI wiring, because the secret
that would feed it cannot exist.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <[email protected]>

.gitea/workflows/gate.yml

@@ -110,9 +110,27 @@ jobs:
       # UNVERIFIED and NAMED in the PASS headline, never faked green. GATE_STRICT_SKIPS + the
       # tolerated exit 3 are explained in the file header; the tolerance covers exactly one
       # thing, the unverifiable spec repo, and nothing else can produce a 3 here.
+      # GITEA_SETTINGS_TOKEN feeds ci/gitea-settings.sh, the only check that can see Gitea's
+      # OWN database (branch protection + runner registration) — the blind spot that let `main`
+      # sit unprotected with zero runners for a month while this repo recorded both as working.
+      # Referenced BY NAME only; create it with infra/gitea/set-ci-token.sh.
+      #
+      # WIDENED TOLERANCE, DECLARED: `|| [ "$?" -eq 3 ]` used to cover exactly one skip
+      # (spec-immutability). It now also covers gitea-settings skipping when that secret is
+      # absent. That is a deliberate, temporary weakening: making an unwired credential BLOCK
+      # every PR is the lock-yourself-out failure this repo keeps walking into. Once the secret
+      # exists and the stage has been SEEN green, set REQUIRE_GITEA_SETTINGS=true below and the
+      # tolerance narrows back to spec-immutability alone.
       - name: Merge gate — ci/gate.sh (what `make -C ci gate` runs)
         env:
           GATE_STRICT_SKIPS: "true"
+          SETTINGS_API_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.SETTINGS_API_TOKEN }}
+          # ENABLED 2026-09-29. A skip of gitea-settings now BLOCKS instead of degrading to
+          # UNDETERMINED. Safe because THIS PR's own CI run is the proof: if the stage were
+          # skipping, this line turns that into a failure and the PR goes red instead of
+          # merging. Green here means the token resolved and the live Gitea matched the
+          # declaration in infra/gitea/expected-branch-protection.json.
+          REQUIRE_GITEA_SETTINGS: "true"
         run: ./ci/gate.sh || [ "$?" -eq 3 ]
 
       # NOTE: no actions/upload-artifact step. Gitea Actions rejects upload-artifact@v4

DECISIONS-LOG.md

@@ -4964,3 +4964,148 @@ account rubber-stamping the human. That is ceremony, not review. Options: keep i
 the ceremony; drop `required_approvals` to 0 and rely on the status check, which is the gate
 that actually verifies something; or add a second human account. **This is a decision for the
 operator, not a default to be chosen silently.**
+
+## 2026-09-29 (end of session) — **PM HANDOFF.** Six PRs open; read this before touching anything.
+
+The session that began "set a SOPS secret" ended having rebuilt the delivery pipeline. Plex is
+claimed and scanning. `main` is genuinely protected and the gate genuinely enforces. What is
+open is listed below with the reason each is not merged.
+
+### MERGE THESE — both gated green
+
+| PR | What | Risk |
+|---|---|---|
+| #12 | `CLUSTER_AVAILABLE=true` would have FAKED A GREEN over 54 skipped tests — now blocks | low; makes a wrong state loud |
+| #13 | Admission boundary constraining the conformance CI trigger (R-SEC-02) + a fail-open fix in `ci/l0.sh` | medium; touches Kyverno + adds a Flux Kustomization |
+
+(#11, the Gitea drift detector, was merged during this session — hence the action below.)
+
+Order does not matter for correctness; if a later one conflicts, rebase and the gate re-runs
+(~1m35s in CI, 76s local). **Each was gated in the pinned toolbox, not on a host.**
+
+### DO THIS FIRST — #11 is merged and its detector is currently INERT
+
+`ci/gitea-settings.sh` SKIPS until its token exists, and **a skipped detector detects nothing**:
+
+    ./infra/gitea/set-ci-token.sh          # mints + stores GITEA_SETTINGS_TOKEN, never prints it
+
+Then open any PR and confirm the gate prints `gitea-settings: green`. ONLY THEN uncomment
+`REQUIRE_GITEA_SETTINGS: "true"` in `.gitea/workflows/gate.yml`, so a future missing token blocks
+instead of skipping. Doing that before seeing it green locks the repo.
+
+Until then every gate run ends `MERGE GATE: UNDETERMINED` (exit 3) naming `gitea-settings` as
+unrun. That is BY DESIGN and `gate.yml` tolerates exit 3, so PRs still pass — but it is not a
+green run, and it is saying so honestly. The token is what turns it green.
+
+### A DIFFERENT COMPUTER NEEDS THREE THINGS THAT ARE NOT IN GIT
+
+This is the part that will silently waste an hour otherwise. None of these are in the repo, by
+design, and without them the toolbox and the cluster are unreachable:
+
+1. **`~/.config/sops/age/keys.txt`** — the age PRIVATE key. Without it NO `*.sops.yaml` can be
+   read or edited, and `sops` will fail in a way that looks like a broken file. Copy it from this
+   workstation; the public recipient in `.sops.yaml` is only half the pair.
+2. **`infra/ansible/.cache/prod.kubeconfig`** — untracked, so it exists only in the main checkout
+   on this machine. Without it `dev.sh` refuses to start. In a git WORKTREE it is absent even
+   here: use `DEV_KUBECONFIG=/dev/null` for anything that needs no cluster (see `CLAUDE.md` §3).
+3. **A Gitea credential** for `gitea.home.keithjackson.dev` (this session used the stored
+   `~/.git-credentials`). `git push` and every `infra/gitea/*.sh` script needs it.
+
+### STATE, MEASURED — do not re-derive it from this log, re-measure it
+
+`CLAUDE.md` §2b exists because this log was confidently wrong for a month. Verify before relying:
+
+    protected:true  user_can_push:false  enable_status_check:true
+    status_check_contexts:["gate / gate (pull_request)"]  required_approvals:1
+    block_admin_merge_override:true      runner incluster-dind: online      gate ~1m35s
+
+### NEXT WORK, in priority order
+
+1. **Finish the L2/L3 wiring** now that the credential model is decided and #13 lands the
+   boundary. Still missing (`docs/plans/l2-l3-conformance-ci-wiring.md` §3): a runner image with
+   bash/python3/kubectl/git/chainsaw, an init-container cloning the repo at the PR SHA, results
+   collection via a base64 tar on stdout, and the `ci/conformance.sh` rewrite to drive the Job.
+   **Tighten the admission policy's image pattern to the literal digest when that image exists.**
+2. **Do NOT set `vars.CLUSTER_AVAILABLE=true`** until step 1 is done. It does not enable L2/L3; it
+   only changes which way the stage fails (see #12).
+3. The `gitea-settings` detector covers branch protection + runners. It does NOT yet cover Gitea
+   Actions **variables and secrets** — the next-nearest invisible surface.
+4. `required_approvals: 1` with two accounts means a PR authored by `jakman85` needs `gitea-admin`
+   to approve. The operator holds ultimate authority and does not require that review; revisit if
+   it becomes friction.
+
+### THE LESSON, because it caused every finding here
+
+Four times this session the repository was treated as evidence about the live platform, and four
+times it was wrong: the push that would "be rejected" (it would not have been), the token that
+"could not survive the pipeline" (~2m45s, it fits), the required check that would "deadlock" (a
+skipped Gitea job reports SUCCESS), and enforcement that was "on" (admins overrode it). Two
+fail-opens in the gate itself were found the same way — `kyverno test` certifying policies that do
+not load, and `CLUSTER_AVAILABLE` certifying 54 skipped tests as passed.
+
+**Measure, then assert. `CLAUDE.md` §2b is the rule; this entry is the evidence for it.**
+
+## 2026-09-29 (addendum, unattended) — the detector is armed; **I CANNOT MERGE, and that is correct**
+
+Operator ran `set-ci-token.sh`, uncommented `REQUIRE_GITEA_SETTINGS` locally on `main`, and left
+instructions to continue unattended and merge on green CI. Two things came out of that.
+
+### 1. The detector was INERT, and would have stayed inert silently
+
+`set-ci-token.sh` PUT the secret as `GITEA_SETTINGS_TOKEN`. **Gitea reserves the `GITEA_`
+prefix** for secret names (as GitHub reserves `GITHUB_`) and rejected it:
+
+    HTTP 400  {"message":"invalid secret name"}
+
+The script sent that PUT to `/dev/null` and printed `==> stored.` unconditionally; `curl -sS`
+exits 0 on an HTTP error. **A token existed; no secret did.** So `ci/gitea-settings.sh` would
+have skipped on every run forever — and enabling `REQUIRE_GITEA_SETTINGS` on top of that would
+have BLOCKED EVERY PR, including the one fixing it. That is the exact lock-out this repo has now
+nearly walked into three times.
+
+Fixed in **PR #15**: the secret is `SETTINGS_API_TOKEN`, and `set-ci-token.sh` now checks the HTTP
+status AND reads the secret back before claiming success. The missing verification was the real
+defect; the illegal name is only what it hid. The secret is stored and verified present, and
+**PR #15's CI is GREEN with `REQUIRE_GITEA_SETTINGS=true`** — which is the only proof that
+matters, because a skip would have made it red.
+
+The operator's local edit could not be pushed to `main` (protected). It is carried in PR #15.
+
+### 2. No agent-authored PR can be merged without the operator — by design
+
+Merging PR #12 as `gitea-admin` returned:
+
+    HTTP 405  {"message":"Does not have enough approvals"}
+
+`required_approvals: 1` + `block_admin_merge_override: true` + two accounts, one of which
+(`gitea-admin`) authors every agent PR and cannot self-approve. **So "merge on green CI" is not
+something an agent can execute here.** That is the control working, not a fault — and it was
+deliberately not circumvented. Self-approving would hollow out the boundary that was just built
+and verified.
+
+**This is an operator decision, not a bug to fix:** either accept that every agent PR waits for a
+human approval (the honest reading of the control), or add a second human reviewer account, or
+lower `required_approvals` to 0 and rely on the status check — which is the gate that actually
+verifies something. Whichever, change the DECLARATION in
+`infra/gitea/expected-branch-protection.json` in the same commit, or `gitea-settings` will
+correctly fail the gate on the drift.
+
+### Open PRs, all gated green, none mergeable by an agent
+
+| PR | What |
+|---|---|
+| #12 | `CLUSTER_AVAILABLE=true` would have faked a green over 54 skipped tests — now blocks |
+| #13 | Conformance-trigger admission boundary (R-SEC-02) + `kyverno test` fail-open fix |
+| #14 | This handoff |
+| #15 | Secret-name fix + `REQUIRE_GITEA_SETTINGS` enabled — **CI green with REQUIRE active** |
+
+Suggested order: #15 first (it arms the detector and its CI already proved it), then #12, #13,
+#14. If a later one conflicts, rebase; the gate re-runs in ~1m36s.
+
+### Deliberately NOT done while unattended
+
+No new feature work was started. Five unmerged PRs already stack review burden, and building the
+next L2/L3 piece on top of unmerged branches would create a rebase tangle for no gain — the work
+cannot land any faster. The next piece is specified and ready to start once these are merged:
+`docs/plans/l2-l3-conformance-ci-wiring.md` §3, with §4's credential model now decided and its
+boundary landed in #13.

ci/Makefile

@@ -32,6 +32,9 @@ render-golden: ## render==golden: canonical render reproduces committed apps/ (n
 l1: ## L1 rendering checks (no cluster; live now)
 	@"$(CI_DIR)l1.sh"
 
+gitea-settings: ## Gitea branch protection + runners match infra/gitea/expected-branch-protection.json (SKIPS w/o GITEA_SETTINGS_TOKEN)
+	@./gitea-settings.sh
+
 conformance: ## L2/L3 in-cluster Chainsaw Job (SKIPS w/o CLUSTER_AVAILABLE=true)
 	@"$(CI_DIR)conformance.sh"
 

ci/conformance.sh

@@ -61,5 +61,45 @@ if [ -d "${CONF_ART}/coverage" ]; then
   cp -r "${CONF_ART}/coverage/." "${COVERAGE_DIR}/"
 fi
 
+# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
+# DID IT ACTUALLY RUN? -- the guard without which this stage FAKES A GREEN.
+#
+# run.sh exits 0 in "scaffold mode" when it cannot reach a cluster: it emits a JUnit file
+# whose every testcase is <skipped> and returns success. That is correct FOR run.sh -- an
+# honest skip is its documented no-cluster behaviour. It is catastrophic HERE, because
+# reaching this point means the environment DECLARED CLUSTER_AVAILABLE=true, and this stage
+# would otherwise print "L2/L3 conformance passed" over 54 tests that never executed.
+#
+# MEASURED 2026-09-29, before this guard existed:
+#   CLUSTER_AVAILABLE=true ./ci/conformance.sh   ->  rc=0
+#   "[junit] wrote skipped JUnit for 54 scaffolded test(s)"
+#   "[ ok ] L2/L3 conformance passed for touched subset"
+# One Gitea variable away from a fake green on an enforcing merge gate. That is exactly the
+# HARD RULE 4 violation this repo's whole gate design exists to prevent, and nothing caught
+# it because nobody had ever set the variable.
+#
+# A skip while a cluster is DECLARED is a contradiction: either the declaration is wrong or
+# the cluster is unreachable. The merge-gate decision matrix already says this case is BLOCK
+# ("conformance skipped while CLUSTER_AVAILABLE=true -> BLOCK (it should have run)"). This
+# makes the stage itself honour that instead of reporting a pass.
+JUNIT="${CONF_ART}/report.junit.xml"
+if [ -f "$JUNIT" ]; then
+  total="$(grep -o '<testcase' "$JUNIT" | wc -l | tr -d ' ')"
+  skipped="$(grep -o '<skipped' "$JUNIT" | wc -l | tr -d ' ')"
+  if [ "${total:-0}" -gt 0 ] && [ "${skipped:-0}" -ge "${total:-0}" ]; then
+    err "CLUSTER_AVAILABLE=true, but the L2/L3 suite SKIPPED every one of its ${total} tests"
+    err "  (scaffold mode -- run.sh could not reach a cluster and exited 0)."
+    err "  This stage will NOT report that as a pass. Either the cluster is unreachable from"
+    err "  this runner, or CLUSTER_AVAILABLE is set when it should not be."
+    err "  NOTE: the in-cluster trigger path is still UNIMPLEMENTED -- see"
+    err "  docs/plans/l2-l3-conformance-ci-wiring.md. Setting CLUSTER_AVAILABLE=true does not"
+    err "  by itself make L2/L3 run; it only makes this stage attempt a LOCAL run that the CI"
+    err "  runner has no credential for (automountServiceAccountToken: false, by design)."
+    summary "- conformance-l2-l3: **BLOCKED — declared available but every test skipped** (not a pass)"
+    exit 1
+  fi
+  log "L2/L3 executed: ${total} testcase(s), ${skipped} skipped"
+fi
+
 ok "L2/L3 conformance passed for touched subset"
 summary "- conformance-l2-l3: **passed**"

ci/gate.sh

@@ -112,6 +112,7 @@ run_stage lint          "${CI_DIR}/lint.sh"
 run_stage l0            "${CI_DIR}/l0.sh"
 run_stage render-golden "${CI_DIR}/render-golden.sh"
 run_stage l1            "${CI_DIR}/l1.sh"
+run_stage gitea-settings "${CI_DIR}/gitea-settings.sh"
 run_stage conformance   "${CI_DIR}/conformance.sh"
 
 echo >&2
@@ -188,6 +189,31 @@ case "${OUTCOME[spec-immutability]}" in
   pass) ok   "spec-immutability: green" ;;
 esac
 
+# gitea-settings: the ONLY check that can see Gitea's own database (branch protection +
+# runner registration). A FAIL is real drift and always blocks -- that is the whole point.
+# A SKIP means no token or unreachable Gitea, which is an UNWIRED CREDENTIAL, not a defect
+# in the change under test. It is deliberately NOT in the strict-skips loop below: making an
+# absent secret block every PR is precisely the lock-yourself-out failure this repo keeps
+# walking into (a required check with nothing able to satisfy it). So a skip denies a PASS
+# (exit 3) and says loudly what is unverified. Set REQUIRE_GITEA_SETTINGS=true once the
+# token is wired, and the skip becomes a block as it should.
+case "${OUTCOME[gitea-settings]}" in
+  fail) err "gitea-settings: Gitea DRIFTED from infra/gitea/expected-branch-protection.json -> blocks merge"; BLOCK=1 ;;
+  skip)
+    if truthy "${REQUIRE_GITEA_SETTINGS:-false}"; then
+      err "gitea-settings: skipped and REQUIRE_GITEA_SETTINGS=true -> blocks merge"
+      summary "- gitea-settings: **SKIPPED** (no token) — blocks merge (REQUIRE_GITEA_SETTINGS=true)"
+      BLOCK=1
+    else
+      warn "gitea-settings: skipped (no GITEA_SETTINGS_TOKEN) — branch protection and runner"
+      warn "  registration are UNVERIFIED. Both were silently wrong for a month. Wire the token"
+      warn "  (infra/gitea/set-ci-token.sh), then set REQUIRE_GITEA_SETTINGS=true."
+      summary "- gitea-settings: **SKIPPED** (no token — protection/runners unverified; not a pass)"
+      NOT_ESTABLISHED+=("gitea-settings")
+    fi ;;
+  pass) ok "gitea-settings: green" ;;
+esac
+
 # L0/L1 stages: any failure blocks. A SKIP here means a pinned tool is missing or a seam is
 # unwired — NEVER green. In CI (strict) that is a defect and blocks; on a workstation it
 # degrades to UNDETERMINED, which is still non-zero and still not a pass. render-golden is a

ci/gitea-settings.sh

@@ -0,0 +1,133 @@
+#!/usr/bin/env bash
+# ci/gitea-settings.sh — Stage: the Gitea platform settings that gate this repo still
+# match what git declares.
+#
+# WHY THIS STAGE EXISTS AT ALL
+# ----------------------------
+# Every other check in this repo reads the repository, the rendered manifests, or the
+# cluster. NONE of them can see Gitea's own database — and that is where branch
+# protection and runner registration live. On 2026-09-29 that blind spot was measured:
+#
+#   * `main` had NO branch protection, and
+#   * ZERO Actions runners were registered,
+#
+# for roughly a month, while DECISIONS-LOG.md recorded both as working and every agent
+# and human in the loop repeated that claim because the repository said so. PR #1 — the
+# first pull request this repo ever had — sat `pending` for 30.6 minutes with nothing to
+# execute it. Later the same day `enable_status_check` and `required_approvals` were turned
+# on and STILL did not bite, because `block_admin_merge_override` was false; PRs #5-#9
+# merged with zero approvals recorded against `required_approvals: 1`.
+#
+# Three separate failures, one shape: a setting that READ as enforced while not being, with
+# no mechanism anywhere that could notice. Scripts that ASSERT the desired state
+# (infra/gitea/*.sh) do not detect drift from it. This stage is the detector.
+#
+# WHAT IT ASSERTS
+#   1. every key in infra/gitea/expected-branch-protection.json `.protection` matches the
+#      LIVE rule at /repos/{repo}/branch_protections/{branch}, exactly;
+#   2. at least `.runners_online_min` Actions runners report status "online".
+#
+# (2) is not decoration. A required status check with no runner is the deadlock this repo
+# nearly walked into: every PR pends forever, including the one that would fix it.
+#
+# READ THE RULE OBJECT, NOT THE BRANCH VIEW. /repos/{repo}/branches/{branch} reports
+# `protected`, `enable_status_check` and `required_approvals` but NOT
+# `block_admin_merge_override` — it showed all-green while the rule was overridable by the
+# only account that merges. This stage queries /branch_protections/ deliberately.
+#
+# EXIT CODES (the gate contract)
+#   0  live Gitea matches the declaration
+#   1  DIVERGENCE — something drifted, or was never applied. Blocks the merge.
+#   3  SKIP — no token, or Gitea unreachable. Never a pass; see gate.sh, which treats this
+#      skip like spec-immutability's (UNDETERMINED, exit 3) rather than a hard block, so
+#      that an unwired credential cannot lock the repository.
+#
+# TO WIRE IT: create a Gitea repo secret SETTINGS_API_TOKEN (a token that can read repo
+# settings) — infra/gitea/set-ci-token.sh does it. Until then this stage skips LOUDLY and
+# the drift it exists to catch is still undetected.
+#
+# NOT `GITEA_SETTINGS_TOKEN`. This comment named that until 2026-09-29 and it instructed the
+# reader to do something IMPOSSIBLE: Gitea reserves the `GITEA_` prefix for secret names and
+# rejects the PUT with HTTP 400 "invalid secret name". That is not a style rule — it is why the
+# detector sat inert for hours while a token existed and no secret did. The env var below still
+# accepts GITEA_SETTINGS_TOKEN, but only for a LOCAL run: it can never be the CI wiring, because
+# the secret that would feed it cannot be created at all.
+set -euo pipefail
+CI_DIR="$(cd "$(dirname "${BASH_SOURCE[0]}")" && pwd)"
+REPO_ROOT="$(cd "${CI_DIR}/.." && pwd)"
+# shellcheck disable=SC1091
+source "${CI_DIR}/lib.sh"
+
+log "Stage: Gitea platform settings match the declaration"
+
+DECL="${REPO_ROOT}/infra/gitea/expected-branch-protection.json"
+GITEA_URL="${GITEA_URL:-https://gitea.home.keithjackson.dev}"
+GITEA_REPO="${GITEA_REPO:-Home-Network/home-network-k3s-impl}"
+# SETTINGS_API_TOKEN, not GITEA_SETTINGS_TOKEN. Gitea RESERVES the `GITEA_` prefix for
+# secret names and rejects a PUT of one with HTTP 400 "invalid secret name" — the same way
+# GitHub reserves `GITHUB_`. The original name could therefore never be stored, and because
+# infra/gitea/set-ci-token.sh sent that PUT to /dev/null and printed "stored" unconditionally,
+# it looked like it had worked. A token was minted, no secret existed, and this stage would
+# have skipped forever. GITEA_SETTINGS_TOKEN is still honoured for a local run.
+TOKEN="${SETTINGS_API_TOKEN:-${GITEA_SETTINGS_TOKEN:-}}"
+
+[ -f "$DECL" ] || die "declaration missing: ${DECL}"
+require_tool jq
+require_tool curl
+
+if [ -z "$TOKEN" ]; then
+  skip "SETTINGS_API_TOKEN is not set — cannot read the live Gitea rule."
+  skip "  Branch protection and runner registration are therefore UNVERIFIED. They were"
+  skip "  wrong, unnoticed, for a month (2026-09-29). Wire it: infra/gitea/set-ci-token.sh"
+  summary "- gitea-settings: **SKIPPED — no token** (protection + runners UNVERIFIED; not a pass)"
+  exit 3
+fi
+
+api() { curl -sS --max-time 20 -H "Authorization: token ${TOKEN}" "$@"; }
+
+BRANCH="$(jq -r '.branch' "$DECL")"
+LIVE="$(api "${GITEA_URL}/api/v1/repos/${GITEA_REPO}/branch_protections/${BRANCH}" || true)"
+if [ -z "$LIVE" ] || ! jq -e 'type == "object" and has("branch_name")' >/dev/null 2>&1 <<<"$LIVE"; then
+  skip "could not read the branch-protection rule from ${GITEA_URL} (unreachable, or the token"
+  skip "  lacks permission). Not treating this as a pass."
+  summary "- gitea-settings: **SKIPPED — Gitea unreadable** (not a pass)"
+  exit 3
+fi
+
+RC=0
+
+# --- 1. every declared protection key must match the live rule, exactly ---------------
+while IFS= read -r key; do
+  want="$(jq -Sc --arg k "$key" '.protection[$k]' "$DECL")"
+  got="$(jq -Sc --arg k "$key" 'if has($k) then .[$k] else "<<ABSENT>>" end' <<<"$LIVE")"
+  if [ "$want" = "$got" ]; then
+    ok "  ${key} = ${got}"
+  else
+    err "  ${key}: DECLARED ${want} but LIVE is ${got}"
+    RC=1
+  fi
+done < <(jq -r '.protection | keys[]' "$DECL")
+
+# --- 2. a runner must actually be online ----------------------------------------------
+MIN="$(jq -r '.runners_online_min // 1' "$DECL")"
+RUNNERS="$(api "${GITEA_URL}/api/v1/admin/actions/runners" || true)"
+N="$(jq -r '[(.runners//[])[]|select(.status=="online")]|length' <<<"${RUNNERS:-{\}}" 2>/dev/null || echo 0)"
+if [ "${N:-0}" -ge "$MIN" ]; then
+  ok "  runners online: ${N} (>= ${MIN})"
+else
+  err "  runners online: ${N}, DECLARED minimum ${MIN}."
+  err "  A required status check with no runner leaves every PR pending forever —"
+  err "  including the PR that would fix it. This is the 2026-09-29 outage condition."
+  RC=1
+fi
+
+if [ "$RC" -eq 0 ]; then
+  ok "Gitea settings match the declaration."
+  summary "- gitea-settings: **green** (branch protection + runners match \`infra/gitea/expected-branch-protection.json\`)"
+else
+  err "Gitea has DRIFTED from infra/gitea/expected-branch-protection.json."
+  err "  Re-assert it (infra/gitea/require-gate.sh, block-admin-override.sh), or if the live"
+  err "  state is what you now want, change the DECLARATION in the same commit — deliberately."
+  summary "- gitea-settings: **DRIFT** — live Gitea does not match the declaration; blocks merge"
+fi
+exit "$RC"

conformance/tests/l0-static/admission-policies-actually-applied/chainsaw-test.yaml

@@ -0,0 +1,42 @@
+# =============================================================================
+# L0 STATIC — every authored admission policy is actually APPLIED  (R-SEC-01, R-SEC-02)
+# Catalog: docs/14 L0 row ("Pre-apply, in CI") — runs WITHOUT a cluster.
+#
+# WHY THIS EXISTS. `kyverno test` proves a policy is CORRECT. Nothing proved it was DEPLOYED.
+# platform/kyverno/ holds three lists and only platform-config/kustomization.yaml applies
+# anything; the other two are a reference copy and a namespace+HelmRelease render root. On
+# 2026-09-29 the R-SEC-02 boundary policy was added to the reference copy: it parsed, its
+# kyverno test passed, the gate passed, Flux reported the tier Ready at the new revision — and
+# the cluster ran the conformance-trigger ServiceAccount with nothing bounding it.
+#
+# WHOLE-REPO SCOPE, DELIBERATELY. The failure mode is a policy that is present but wired
+# nowhere, which by definition touches no requirement the diff attributes. A path-scoped run
+# would have skipped this check on the very commit that introduced the defect.
+# =============================================================================
+apiVersion: chainsaw.kyverno.io/v1alpha1
+kind: Test
+metadata:
+  name: admission-policies-actually-applied
+  labels:
+    conformance.home.k3s/R-SEC-01: "true"
+    conformance.home.k3s/R-SEC-02: "true"
+  annotations:
+    conformance.home.k3s/requirements: "R-SEC-01,R-SEC-02"
+    conformance.home.k3s/layer: "L0"
+    conformance.home.k3s/scope: "whole-repo"
+    conformance.home.k3s/safety-critical: "false"
+    conformance.home.k3s/executable: "true"
+    conformance.home.k3s/intent: >-
+      Every ClusterPolicy authored under platform/kyverno/ is either referenced by
+      platform-config/kustomization.yaml (so Flux applies it) or is a documented CI-only
+      exemption that is genuinely not applied — so a policy cannot be authored, tested,
+      green, and absent from the cluster.
+spec:
+  steps:
+    - name: every-authored-policy-is-applied-or-documented-ci-only
+      description: >-
+        Enumerate the ClusterPolicy files under platform/kyverno/ and assert each is wired
+        into the Kustomization that actually applies Kyverno CRs, or exempted with a reason.
+      try:
+        - script:
+            content: bash ./check.sh

conformance/tests/l0-static/admission-policies-actually-applied/check.sh

@@ -0,0 +1,120 @@
+#!/usr/bin/env bash
+# =============================================================================
+# L0 static check (offline, no cluster) — admission-policies-actually-applied
+# Serves: R-SEC-01, R-SEC-02 (admission enforcement is only real if it is APPLIED)
+#
+# WHY THIS EXISTS — a policy that ships green and never reaches the cluster.
+#
+# platform/kyverno/ holds THREE lists, and only one of them applies anything:
+#   1. platform/kyverno/admission/kustomization.yaml  — reference only. Its own sibling says
+#      "kept as reference; THIS file is the buildable render root".
+#   2. platform/kyverno/kustomization.yaml            — that render root: namespace +
+#      HelmRelease ONLY. It explicitly notes the ClusterPolicies are applied elsewhere.
+#   3. platform-config/kustomization.yaml             — THE ONE. Kyverno CRs go here because
+#      they need the CRDs from the HelmRelease in (2), so they reconcile a tier later.
+#
+# On 2026-09-29 a ClusterPolicy (conformance-trigger-job-shape, the R-SEC-02 boundary bounding
+# what the conformance CI trigger may create) was added to (1). Everything went green: the file
+# parsed, `kyverno test` exercised it BY PATH and passed, the gate passed, Flux reported
+# `platform` Ready at the new revision — and the policy was never in any applied set. The
+# cluster ended up running the conformance-trigger ServiceAccount with NOTHING bounding it,
+# which is precisely the state that identity's own RBAC header says must never exist.
+#
+# Nothing could have caught it. `kyverno test` proves a policy is CORRECT, not that it is
+# DEPLOYED. This check asserts the second thing.
+#
+# GIVEN the repository as git tracks it,
+# WHEN  every file under platform/kyverno/ that declares a ClusterPolicy is enumerated,
+# THEN  each one is either referenced by platform-config/kustomization.yaml (so Flux applies
+#       it), or named in CI_ONLY below with a reason — and CI_ONLY itself may not name a
+#       policy that IS applied, so the exemption list cannot rot into a lie either way.
+# =============================================================================
+set -euo pipefail
+DIR="$(cd "$(dirname "${BASH_SOURCE[0]}")" && pwd)"
+ROOT="$(cd "${DIR}/../../../.." && pwd)"        # repo root
+exec python3 - "$ROOT" <<'PY'
+import sys, subprocess
+from pathlib import Path
+
+ROOT = Path(sys.argv[1])
+FAILURES, CHECKS = [], 0
+
+def check(cond, desc):
+    global CHECKS
+    CHECKS += 1
+    if not cond:
+        FAILURES.append(desc)
+
+# Policies authored for the CI L0 gate that are deliberately NOT applied in-cluster. Each needs
+# a reason, and each is asserted BELOW to really be absent from the applied set — an exemption
+# that silently starts being applied is as much a lie as one that silently stops.
+CI_ONLY = {
+    "disallow-plaintext-secrets":
+        "CI-only by design: it requires a top-level `sops` block, which is IMPOSSIBLE at "
+        "admission because Flux decrypts before the Secret reaches the API server. Its "
+        "in-cluster counterpart is admission/secret-provenance.yaml.",
+}
+
+tracked = subprocess.run(["git", "ls-files", "-z", "--", "platform/kyverno/**/*.yaml",
+                          "platform/kyverno/*.yaml"],
+                         cwd=ROOT, capture_output=True, text=True, check=True)
+files = [ROOT / p for p in tracked.stdout.split("\0") if p]
+
+# A ClusterPolicy file, identified without a YAML parse of every doc: cheap and sufficient.
+policies = {}
+for f in files:
+    try:
+        txt = f.read_text()
+    except Exception:
+        continue
+    if "kind: ClusterPolicy" not in txt:
+        continue
+    for line in txt.splitlines():
+        st = line.strip()
+        if st.startswith("name:") and "  name:" in line:
+            policies[f.relative_to(ROOT).as_posix()] = st.split("name:", 1)[1].strip()
+            break
+
+check(len(policies) >= 6,
+      f"(0) the scan found {len(policies)} ClusterPolicy file(s) under platform/kyverno/ — "
+      f"too few means the scan broke, and every assertion below would be vacuous")
+
+applied_txt = (ROOT / "platform-config" / "kustomization.yaml").read_text()
+
+unapplied, wrongly_exempt = [], []
+for rel, name in sorted(policies.items()):
+    # platform-config references these as ../platform/kyverno/...
+    referenced = rel in applied_txt or rel.replace("platform/", "../platform/", 1) in applied_txt
+    if name in CI_ONLY:
+        if referenced:
+            wrongly_exempt.append(f"{name} ({rel}) is listed CI_ONLY but IS applied by platform-config")
+    elif not referenced:
+        unapplied.append(f"{name} ({rel})")
+
+check(not unapplied,
+      f"(1) every in-cluster ClusterPolicy is referenced by platform-config/kustomization.yaml "
+      f"— an unreferenced policy is authored, tested, green, and NEVER APPLIED {unapplied if unapplied else ''}")
+
+check(not wrongly_exempt,
+      f"(2) no CI_ONLY exemption names a policy that IS applied — a stale exemption hides a "
+      f"real deployment {wrongly_exempt if wrongly_exempt else ''}")
+
+for name, reason in CI_ONLY.items():
+    check(bool(reason.strip()),
+          f"(3) CI_ONLY['{name}'] carries a reason — an unexplained exemption is how this "
+          f"list stops being reviewable")
+
+check(CHECKS >= 4,
+      f"only {CHECKS} assertions ran — the check degenerated to a near-no-op")
+
+if FAILURES:
+    print(f"CHECK FAIL (admission-policies-actually-applied): {len(FAILURES)} of {CHECKS} assertions failed",
+          file=sys.stderr)
+    for f in FAILURES:
+        print(f"  - {f}", file=sys.stderr)
+    raise SystemExit(1)
+print(f"check OK: admission-policies-actually-applied — {CHECKS} assertions; "
+      f"{len(policies)} ClusterPolicy file(s), {len(policies) - len(CI_ONLY)} applied by "
+      f"platform-config, {len(CI_ONLY)} CI-only with reasons. Proves policies are DEPLOYED, "
+      f"not that they are correct — `kyverno test` is what proves correctness.")
+PY

docs/plans/l2-l3-conformance-ci-wiring.md

@@ -38,8 +38,21 @@ agents. So the credential model must be decided by the operator before anything
 | Runner deployment | `apps/wave-1/gitea-actions.yaml` | act_runner + DinD (Docker executor). **`automountServiceAccountToken: false`** — the runner and its job containers hold NO SA token. Broad egress allowed (`- {}`), so it can *reach* the kube-API VIP `192.168.1.49:6443`, but has no credential. |
 | Secrets encryption | `.sops.yaml` (repo root) | age recipient `age175l8m…mfzg`; encrypts `data`/`stringData` of `*.sops.yaml` under `platform|apps|catalog/**` and `secrets/**`. Private key is the in-cluster `sops-age` Secret Flux uses. |
 
-**Cluster reality:** the "Phase 0 / no cluster" language in these files is stale — the dev cluster
-is LIVE (Phase 6). So `CLUSTER_AVAILABLE` is the only remaining gate, exactly as the blueprint says.
+**Cluster reality:** the "Phase 0 / no cluster" language in these files is stale — the cluster is
+LIVE (and it is now PROD; dev was decommissioned 2026-09-12).
+
+> **CORRECTION (2026-09-29): `CLUSTER_AVAILABLE` is NOT "the only remaining gate", and setting it
+> today is actively DANGEROUS.** Measured: with `CLUSTER_AVAILABLE=true` and no reachable cluster,
+> `conformance/run.sh` exits 0 in scaffold mode having marked all 54 tests `<skipped>`, and
+> `ci/conformance.sh` then printed `[ ok ] L2/L3 conformance passed for touched subset` — **rc 0, a
+> fake green**, on a merge gate that is now an enforcing required status check. The CI runner has
+> no cluster credential at all (`automountServiceAccountToken: false`, by design), so the "local
+> run" this stage attempts can never succeed; it can only skip and, before the guard added on
+> 2026-09-29, lie about it.
+>
+> `ci/conformance.sh` now BLOCKS (exit 1) when a cluster is declared but every test skipped. **Do
+> not set `CLUSTER_AVAILABLE=true` until §3's trigger path actually exists** — the variable does
+> not enable L2/L3, it only changes which way this stage fails.
 
 ---
 

infra/gitea/README.md

@@ -86,6 +86,32 @@ enabling enforcement and probing the push. `require-gate.sh` is the enforcement
 
 Re-run `verify-then-enforce.sh` after any future change to the act-runner Deployment.
 
+### `expected-branch-protection.json` + `ci/gitea-settings.sh` — the detector
+
+`expected-branch-protection.json` **declares** the desired rule. `ci/gitea-settings.sh` runs as
+a merge-gate stage, reads the LIVE rule, and **fails the gate on any divergence** — plus asserts
+at least one runner is online. It is the only thing in this repository that can see Gitea's own
+database.
+
+It reads `/branch_protections/main`, not `/branches/main`: the branch view does **not** expose
+`block_admin_merge_override`, and it showed all-green for hours while the rule was overridable.
+
+Behaviour, proven by test rather than assumed:
+
+| Situation | Exit | Effect |
+|---|---|---|
+| live matches the declaration | 0 | green |
+| any key drifted, or no runner online | 1 | **blocks the merge** |
+| no `GITEA_SETTINGS_TOKEN`, or Gitea unreachable | 3 | skips **loudly**; never a pass, never a block |
+
+The skip is deliberately *not* a block: an unwired credential blocking every PR is the
+lock-yourself-out failure this repo keeps hitting. Wire the token with `set-ci-token.sh`, confirm
+the stage goes **green on a real PR**, and only then set `REQUIRE_GITEA_SETTINGS=true` in
+`gate.yml` so a future missing token blocks instead of skipping.
+
+**Changing the declaration is how you change policy.** If the live state is what you now want,
+edit this JSON in the same commit — deliberately, in review — rather than letting the two drift.
+
 ### Why these scripts exist at all, and what is still missing
 
 Gitea's repo settings live in **its own database**, not in anything Flux reconciles or the
@@ -94,10 +120,12 @@ the root cause of the entire 2026-09-29 session: branch protection was off and t
 gone for a month while the log recorded both as working, and **no check existed that could
 have caught it.**
 
-These scripts encode the desired state and can re-assert it, but they are not a detector. The
-durable fix is a conformance check that reads the live Gitea API and fails when it diverges
-from what is declared here — turning a class of silent, invisible failure into a loud one.
-**That check does not exist yet and is the highest-value remaining work in this directory.**
+These scripts encode the desired state and can re-assert it; `ci/gitea-settings.sh` above is the
+**detector** that turns divergence from a silent, invisible failure into a loud one. It closes the
+root cause of the 2026-09-29 session.
+
+It is only as good as its wiring: **until `GITEA_SETTINGS_TOKEN` exists it skips**, and a skipped
+detector detects nothing. That is the remaining step.
 
 ## Historical sequence (kept for context)
 

infra/gitea/expected-branch-protection.json

@@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
+{
+  "_comment": "DECLARED desired state of Gitea branch protection on main. ci/gitea-settings.sh fails the merge gate when the LIVE Gitea diverges from this. Gitea settings live in Gitea database - invisible to Flux, unreadable by every other check - so this file plus that check are the only drift detection that exists for them.",
+  "_generated": "2026-09-29 from the live rule, after the session that found protection OFF and zero runners for a month",
+  "branch": "main",
+  "runners_online_min": 1,
+  "protection": {
+    "enable_push": false,
+    "enable_push_whitelist": false,
+    "enable_merge_whitelist": false,
+    "enable_status_check": true,
+    "status_check_contexts": [
+      "gate / gate (pull_request)"
+    ],
+    "required_approvals": 1,
+    "enable_approvals_whitelist": false,
+    "block_admin_merge_override": true,
+    "block_on_rejected_reviews": true,
+    "dismiss_stale_approvals": true
+  }
+}

infra/gitea/set-ci-token.sh

@@ -0,0 +1,56 @@
+#!/usr/bin/env bash
+# Mint a Gitea API token and store it as the repo Actions secret GITEA_SETTINGS_TOKEN,
+# so ci/gitea-settings.sh can read the live branch-protection rule during the gate.
+#
+# The token value is NEVER printed. It goes from the token API into the secrets API and
+# nowhere else -- not to stdout, not to a file, not into an agent transcript.
+#
+# Scope: `read:repository` + `read:admin` are what the check needs (the rule object, and the
+# runner list). Gitea token scopes are coarse; grant the least that works on your version and
+# confirm the check goes green rather than assuming the scope name.
+set -euo pipefail
+HOST=gitea.home.keithjackson.dev; OWNER=Home-Network; REPO=home-network-k3s-impl
+# NOT GITEA_* — Gitea reserves that prefix for secret names and returns HTTP 400
+# "invalid secret name". The first version of this script used GITEA_SETTINGS_TOKEN, sent the
+# PUT to /dev/null, and printed "stored" regardless; the secret never existed and nobody knew.
+SECRET=SETTINGS_API_TOKEN
+NAME="ci-gitea-settings-$(date +%Y%m%d%H%M%S)"
+creds="$(printf 'protocol=https\nhost=%s\n\n' "$HOST" | git credential fill)"
+U="$(sed -n 's/^username=//p' <<<"$creds")"; P="$(sed -n 's/^password=//p' <<<"$creds")"
+basic() { curl -sS --config <(printf 'user = "%s:%s"\n' "$U" "$P") "$@"; }
+
+echo "==> minting token '${NAME}' as ${U}"
+TOKEN="$(basic -X POST -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
+  -d "{\"name\":\"${NAME}\",\"scopes\":[\"read:repository\",\"read:admin\"]}" \
+  "https://${HOST}/api/v1/users/${U}/tokens" | jq -r '.sha1 // empty')"
+[ -n "$TOKEN" ] || { echo "token creation failed (check scopes for your Gitea version)" >&2; exit 1; }
+echo "==> got a ${#TOKEN}-character token (value not shown)"
+
+echo "==> storing it as repo Actions secret ${SECRET}"
+code="$(basic -o /tmp/set-ci-token.out -w '%{http_code}' -X PUT -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
+  -d "$(jq -n --arg d "$TOKEN" '{data:$d}')" \
+  "https://${HOST}/api/v1/repos/${OWNER}/${REPO}/actions/secrets/${SECRET}")"
+unset TOKEN
+if [ "$code" != 201 ] && [ "$code" != 204 ]; then
+  echo "   PUT failed: HTTP ${code} -- $(head -c 200 /tmp/set-ci-token.out)" >&2
+  rm -f /tmp/set-ci-token.out; exit 1
+fi
+rm -f /tmp/set-ci-token.out
+
+# VERIFY BY READING IT BACK. curl -sS exits 0 on an HTTP error, so without this the script
+# reports success for a store that never happened -- which is exactly what it did.
+names="$(basic "https://${HOST}/api/v1/repos/${OWNER}/${REPO}/actions/secrets" \
+        | jq -rc '[.. | objects | select(has("name")) | .name] | unique')"
+grep -q "$SECRET" <<<"$names" \
+  || { echo "   stored HTTP ${code} but ${SECRET} is NOT in ${names} -- refusing to claim success" >&2; exit 1; }
+echo "==> stored and VERIFIED present: ${names}"
+
+cat <<'NOTE'
+
+Next:
+  1. .gitea/workflows/gate.yml already passes this secret to the gate step.
+  2. Open any PR and confirm the gate prints "gitea-settings: green" -- it SKIPS silently
+     without the token, so a green run is the only proof the wiring works.
+  3. THEN set REQUIRE_GITEA_SETTINGS=true in gate.yml, so a future missing token BLOCKS
+     instead of skipping. Do that only after you have seen it green, or you lock the repo.
+NOTE

platform-config/kustomization.yaml

@@ -34,6 +34,14 @@ resources:
   # policies, the next import is blocked in the gap.
   - ../platform/kyverno/policies/label-cdi-worker-pods.yaml
   - ../platform/kyverno/admission/secret-provenance.yaml
+  # R-SEC-02 — bounds what the conformance CI trigger may create. MUST be listed HERE: this
+  # Kustomization is what actually applies ClusterPolicies. Adding a policy only to
+  # platform/kyverno/admission/kustomization.yaml is a SILENT NO-OP — that file is reference
+  # only ("kept as reference; THIS file is the buildable render root" in
+  # platform/kyverno/kustomization.yaml, which itself ships only the namespace + HelmRelease).
+  # That is exactly how this policy shipped green and never reached the cluster on 2026-09-29,
+  # leaving the conformance-trigger identity live with nothing bounding it.
+  - ../platform/kyverno/admission/conformance-trigger-job-shape.yaml
   # cilium: L2 LB IP pool + announcement policy (cilium.io CRDs already registered by Cilium)
   - cilium/l2-ip-pool.yaml
   - cilium/l2-announcement-policy.yaml