Compare commits

..
Author SHA1 Message Date
jakman85andClaude Opus 5 dc136a4943 fix(auth): the forward-auth sidecar also died at 5 minutes and served no metrics
gate / gate (pull_request) Successful in 1m42s
gate / conformance (pull_request) Has been skipped
Widens the cookie-collision fix to the whole sidecar contract, because all three
defects live in the same function and land on the same five goldens, so they are one
atomic change or they are five conflicting ones.

Added to _oauth2_sidecar_container(), on top of the cookie-name/cookie-domain fix:

  --cookie-refresh=2m30s
      The session died FIVE MINUTES after sign-in. Keycloak's homelab realm issues
      300-second access tokens (MEASURED on a live session: expires - created =
      300.000s exactly, with refresh_token:true on the same line), and
      --cookie-refresh defaults to 0 -- which the pinned binary's own help spells
      "0 to disable". So the proxy held a refresh token it was never told to spend.
      Refresh at HALF the lifetime: two chances to renew before expiry.
      This, not the collision, is what dominates the rejection VOLUME -- ~95% of
      radarr's 155 rejections in 12h carry no cookie at all.

  --metrics-address=0.0.0.0:44180 + a `metrics` container port
      Without the flag the /metrics listener never starts, so no per-app sidecar was
      serving metrics at all (`ports` was ['http'] on all six). 44180 is the
      platform's existing convention, measured not chosen: the shared proxy already
      runs the same flag and port with 2 ready endpoints.
      PREREQUISITE ONLY -- NOT scraped. A container port is not a Service port, and
      each namespace's default-deny baseline is `ingress: []`, so this is unreachable
      until a Service port (or PodMonitor), a monitoring allow and a ServiceMonitor
      land. Do not read this as "the sidecars have metrics now".

EVERY FLAG VERIFIED AGAINST THE PINNED v7.8.1 BINARY (`--help`), not against docs or
the shared proxy -- which runs v7.15.3 and could not have vouched for v7.8.1:
  * --metrics-address exists in 7.8.1, so this cannot crashloop the pods
  * --cookie-refresh ... "0 to disable" confirms the default
  * --cookie-name ... (default "_oauth2_proxy") -- this confirms from the
    IMPLEMENTATION the constant the new L0 check is built on
  * --api-route is SINGULAR; the plural does not exist and the proxy refuses to start
  * --session-cookie-minimal exists and is mutually exclusive with --cookie-refresh,
    so dropping --pass-access-token is a least-privilege argument, never a size fix

NOT done, deliberately: --api-route=^/api/ renderer-wide. It was measured on jackett
and PiHole does not serve /api/, so a renderer constant would apply one app's path
shape to five. It needs a per-app hook the `auth` schema forbids
(additionalProperties: false) -- a schema change, separate PR.

Also records the mechanism that made this INTERMITTENT, as a renderer comment, because
nobody would reconstruct it from the flags: the loser does not just fail to read the
cookie, it calls ClearSession, which expires the cookie on its own --cookie-domain --
the whole zone. The *arr UIs poll (/api/v3/command, /api/v3/queue/details,
/signalr/negotiate), so every poll carrying an undecryptable cookie clears it again:
A LEFT-OPEN RADARR TAB DELETED JACKETT'S COOKIE EVERY FEW SECONDS, from another
namespace, with no user action. That is why signing in again never helped for longer
than the gap between two polls.

Crafty's counter-evidence resolved: the 81:1 ratio was a 24h window straddling a
13h52m-old pod. Bounded to the fixed process, crafty's ENTIRE life is 3 rejections in
6743 log lines, with ZERO `removing session` and ZERO `cookie signature not valid`
against unfixed radarr's 8 and 8. The eviction fingerprint is gone where the fix is
deployed. It logged 0 AuthSuccess too, so that is absence-of-the-failure-mode rather
than a session watched working -- stated as such in the handoff.

Renderer selftest gains six assertions, including a --cookie-refresh check that PARSES
the duration and requires 0 < refresh < 300s (so 2m30s/150s/2.5m all stay green while a
silent widening past the token lifetime does not). NOTE, and it is in the handoff as the
top follow-up: NOTHING IN ci/ RUNS `render.py --selftest`, so those assertions are
dev-time only. conformance/tests/l0-static/auditability-proofs-producible/check.sh:291
already drives other tools' selftests for exactly this reason and is the one-line fix.

Gate (toolbox, worktree shim with the spec repo mounted at /home-network-k3s): rc 3
UNDETERMINED. Green: spec-immutability, decisions-log, lint, l0, render-golden, l1,
approval-policy. Skipped: gitea-settings (no local token), conformance (declared).
The new L0 check PASSES on this branch -- all five apps fixed in one commit.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <[email protected]>
2026-09-30 13:07:43 -05:00
jakman85andClaude Opus 5 f4a155a807 docs(decisions): the collision is measured; that it CAUSES the failures is not
gate / gate (pull_request) Failing after 1m43s
gate / conformance (pull_request) Has been skipped
Counter-evidence was raised against this branch: over a 24h Loki window crafty -- the
app already carrying the cookie fix -- showed the WORST auth-rejection ratio of the set
(crafty 81:1, radarr 67:1, jackett 39:4). Taken at face value that says the fix does not
work. It does not say that, and it does not say the opposite either.

Re-measured bounded to the fixed pod, read from each sidecar's OWN log rather than Loki
(`kubectl logs` on a pod with 0 restarts cannot reach a pod older than itself, so a
window inside the pod's age is inside the fixed spec by construction):

    namespace      age(h) rst  reject success    ratio  cleared  badsig
    crafty           13.9   0       3       0      n/a        0       0   <- FIXED, whole life
    radarr          422.5   0     155       1  155.0:1        8       8
    jackett         422.6   0      39       4    9.8:1        1       1
    pihole/qbittorrent/sonarr/shared: 0 reject, 0 success

Three findings, kept apart:

1. `crafty 81:1` is a WINDOW ARTEFACT. The fixed pod has emitted 3 rejections in its
   entire 13.9h life; the 81 came from a 24h window straddling it, i.e. from the pre-fix
   pod. It is not evidence against the fix and must not be cited as such.
2. The fix is still NOT SHOWN TO WORK. Crafty logged ZERO AuthSuccess in that window --
   no traffic, so no ratio. Absence of failure against absence of traffic proves nothing.
3. The collision mechanism IS independently confirmed, and it is a MINORITY of the
   rejections. `cookie signature not valid` + `removing session` is its fingerprint -- a
   cookie IS present, written with a key this instance does not have, so it cannot decrypt
   it and then ClearSession expires it zone-wide. radarr 8 of 155 (5%), jackett 1 of 39,
   fixed crafty 0. ~95% of radarr's rejections carry no cookie at all and point at the
   session-lifetime and 302-on-XHR mechanisms this branch does not touch.

So the handoff now says, at the top and in both evidence sections, that "the instances
collide" and "the collisions cause the reported symptom" are different claims and only
the first is supported. The four fixes stand -- distinct cookie names are correct
regardless -- but nothing here should be read as a cure.

Also records three deliberate NON-fixes with their reasoning (--cookie-refresh, which all
four of my apps need as much as jackett does and which belongs in the renderer rather than
in a golden; --api-routes for 302-on-XHR, which is path-shaped and needs a schema change;
and sidecar metrics, which I judged overreach for a check whose subject is cookie
identity), and two gate facts:

  * spec-immutability was skipping because of a PATH BUG IN THE WORKTREE SHIM, not the
    environment -- dev.sh derives the spec path from its own REPO_ROOT, which in a worktree
    does not resolve. Mounting the spec repo at /home-network-k3s with SPEC_REPO set makes
    R-TEST-06 actually run and PASS. Local gate is now rc 3 for one reason (gitea-settings,
    no token) instead of two.
  * CI's gate reports FAILURE on 75a4029 for exactly one reason, and it is not this change:
    `approval-policy: a sensitive change lacks a non-author approval`. Every substantive
    stage is green in CI, including gitea-settings. conformance/** is a sensitive path, so
    the PR is fail-closed pending a human review -- CLAUDE.md §1 working as designed.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <[email protected]>
2026-09-30 12:56:33 -05:00
jakman85andClaude Opus 5 75a4029d64 docs(decisions): record the measured gate rc, stage list and touched subset
gate / gate (pull_request) Failing after 1m44s
gate / conformance (pull_request) Has been skipped
The handoff asserted a gate outcome before the gate had been run against a
committed branch. Replaces it with what was actually measured on 9a4489b:
rc 3 (UNDETERMINED) -- green decisions-log/lint/l0/render-golden/l1/approval-policy,
skipped spec-immutability/gitea-settings/conformance -- plus the twelve touched
requirements that are UNVERIFIED at L2/L3, and a note that approval-policy passed
VACUOUSLY here (event='none') while the PR itself needs a non-author review because
conformance/** is a sensitive path.

Also records that the three conformance/tests/l1-rendering goldens are regenerated:
they are expected-output fixtures of the same renderer, and the L1 stage caught their
drift on the first gate run rather than anyone remembering them.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <[email protected]>
2026-09-30 12:46:40 -05:00
jakman85andClaude Opus 5 9a4489b733 fix(auth): five oauth2-proxy sidecars shared one cookie and evicted each other
gate / gate (pull_request) Failing after 1m43s
gate / conformance (pull_request) Has been skipped
Every oauth2-proxy on this platform is an independent instance with its OWN
cookie-secret. Measured on prod 2026-09-30: seven `*-oauth2-proxy` Secrets, seven
DISTINCT cookie-secret values (compared in-cluster, never printed). So no instance
can DECRYPT another's cookie -- it can only OVERWRITE it.

All of them were emitting oauth2-proxy's DEFAULT names (`_oauth2_proxy`,
`_oauth2_proxy_csrf`) scoped to `.${BASE_DOMAIN}`, so the browser kept ONE cookie
pair for SIX live instances (jackett, pihole, qbittorrent, radarr, sonarr, and the
shared forward-auth proxy). Whichever authenticated last clobbered the rest; the
loser logged `No valid authentication in request`, bounced to Keycloak, and -- the
SSO session still being live -- was redirected straight back and clobbered it again.
The symptom is "I signed into Keycloak but I'm still not signed in", which sends you
hunting in Keycloak, where nothing is wrong. Crafty was fixed on its own side on
2026-09-29 (#22); this is that fix generalized to the pattern.

THE DEFECT WAS NOT IN THE MANIFESTS. apps/wave-*/{jackett,pihole,qbittorrent,radarr,
sonarr}.yaml are GENERATED goldens; one function emits all five. So the fix is in
catalog/render.py::_oauth2_sidecar_container(), and both flags are now DERIVED from
the ServiceDefinition rather than defaulted:

    --cookie-name=_oauth2_proxy_{s['name']}     unique by construction
    --cookie-domain={host}                      the app's own host, not the zone

A per-service table was rejected for the reason twelve ServiceMonitors once acquired
one identical wrong port name in a single edit: it would leave the NEXT app onboarded
defaulting straight back into the collision. --whitelist-domain stays zone-wide; it
governs post-login REDIRECT targets, not cookie scope.

Host-scoping is defence in depth and is asserted deliberately: a zone-wide cookie is
transmitted by the browser to every host in the zone, so each app's session token was
being sent to every sibling -- and it is what would make a FUTURE name collision
platform-wide instead of contained.

New gate check (whole-repo scope, so it runs on EVERY gate invocation, not only when
a touched path happens to attribute an identity requirement):

    conformance/tests/l0-static/oauth2-proxy-cookie-names-distinct/

It resolves each instance's EFFECTIVE cookie name -- declared, or oauth2-proxy's
built-in default when omitted, because an omitted flag is not an absence but a CLAIM
on a name, and reading it as an absence is exactly why this survived five reviews.
Then: no two collide; none is another's name + `_csrf` (oauth2-proxy derives the CSRF
cookie that way); the default has exactly ONE owner, registered with its reason in a
shrink-only register -- the SHARED proxy, which MUST keep `_oauth2_proxy` because
renaming it signs every other gated surface out at once; every other instance is
host-scoped; render.py derives rather than lists; and the SHIPPED renderer is proven
end-to-end on two synthetic ServiceDefinitions, so the check stays falsifiable once
the tree is clean.

Tested in both directions: rc 0 on this tree (39 assertions, 7 instances), rc 1 with
26 failures against the pre-fix tree, plus one targeted mutation per assertion class
(duplicate name, CSRF derivation, zone-wide domain, unregistered default heir, stale
register entry) -- each fired, and nothing else did.

Also regenerates the three L1 rendering goldens, which are expected-output fixtures
of the same renderer.

UNVERIFIED: no browser round-trip. The collision has still never been REPRODUCED in a
browser -- doing so needs two gated apps visited in one session -- so this is reasoned
from measured configuration and from the mechanism, not from a failure anyone watched.
Nothing was applied; merging rolls five Deployments and invalidates every existing
session on them once. See decisions/2026-09-30-oauth2-proxy-cookie-collision-fleet.md.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <[email protected]>
2026-09-30 10:55:06 -05:00
jakman85 0fbf544d5e Merge pull request 'fix(obs): the deploy notification was inhibited before it could send' (#26) from fix/flux-deploy-notification-inhibited into main
gate / gate (push) Successful in 1m39s
gate / conformance (push) Has been skipped
Reviewed-on: #26
Reviewed-by: Keith Jackson <[email protected]>
2026-09-30 15:18:54 +00:00
jakman85andClaude Opus 5 8427b28b0e fix(obs): the deploy notification was inhibited before it could send
gate / gate (pull_request) Successful in 1m39s
gate / conformance (pull_request) Has been skipped
FluxRolloutInProgress fired correctly on the first real deploy and its mail
was suppressed before Alertmanager dispatched it. One label was wrong.

kube-prometheus-stack ships general.rules -> InfoInhibitor:

  group by (namespace) (ALERTS{severity="info"} == 1)
    unless on (namespace) group by (namespace)
      (ALERTS{alertname!="InfoInhibitor", alertstate="firing",
              severity=~"warning|critical"} == 1)

which fires for any namespace holding a firing info alert AND NOTHING ELSE
wrong in it, and the chart's third inhibit_rule (source alertname=InfoInhibitor
-> target severity="info", equal [namespace]) then drops exactly that alert.

For a deploy notification that is the worst possible interaction, because the
suppressed case is the ONLY case that matters: on a healthy rollout of a healthy
cluster flux-system holds no warning or critical alert, so the notification is
inhibited precisely when it is wanted, and would arrive only when something else
in flux-system was already broken. Measured on prod: InfoInhibitor went active
2026-09-30T04:58:48Z, the same moment the alert began firing for 12
Kustomizations, and amtool showed no FluxRolloutInProgress in Alertmanager
either active or --inhibited, with zero send failures.

Upstream's intent is explicit and fair: severity "info" means "only worth
showing next to a real problem". A deploy notice is not that, so it must not
claim that severity. FluxRolloutInProgress now carries `notification: deploy`
and no severity at all, and the route matches on that label — no inhibit_rule
in the chart targets anything but severity values, and omitting severity also
stops InfoInhibitor firing for flux-system rather than merely working around it.
FluxRolloutStuck keeps severity: warning and is unaffected.

Also verified on prod in the process, all previously UNVERIFIED: the 33 metric
series exist exactly as designed, the `revision` label IS populated (so the
lastAppliedRevision/artifact.revision paths are right), the podAnnotations roll
forced a new KSM pod, and the rule both fired for 12 lagging Kustomizations and
then CLEARED on convergence — the completion signal's whole mechanism, on real
data. Routing proven by `amtool config routes test notification=deploy` ->
email-deploy.

Still unverified: no mail observed in the inbox. The 226->227 email counter
increment during the window cannot be attributed (no receiver label, other
alerts active), and I am not claiming it either way. See the handoff entry.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <[email protected]>
2026-09-30 00:05:10 -05:00
jakman85 64c72fd394 Merge pull request 'feat(obs): notify on Flux deploy start and completion' (#25) from feat/flux-deploy-notifications into main
gate / gate (push) Successful in 1m39s
gate / conformance (push) Has been skipped
Reviewed-on: #25
Reviewed-by: Keith Jackson <[email protected]>
2026-09-30 04:55:50 +00:00
16 changed files with 1401 additions and 20 deletions

No files matched your search

+7 -1
View File
@@ -100,11 +100,14 @@ spec:
- --allowed-group=platform-admins
- --skip-provider-button=true
- --redirect-url=https://jackett.${BASE_DOMAIN}/oauth2/callback
- --cookie-domain=.${BASE_DOMAIN}
- --cookie-name=_oauth2_proxy_jackett
- --cookie-domain=jackett.${BASE_DOMAIN}
- --whitelist-domain=.${BASE_DOMAIN}
- --cookie-secure=true
- --cookie-refresh=2m30s
- --pass-access-token=true
- --set-xauthrequest=true
- --metrics-address=0.0.0.0:44180
env:
- name: OAUTH2_PROXY_CLIENT_ID
valueFrom:
@@ -125,6 +128,9 @@ spec:
- name: http
containerPort: 4180
protocol: TCP
- name: metrics
containerPort: 44180
protocol: TCP
resources:
requests:
cpu: 25m
+7 -1
View File
@@ -108,11 +108,14 @@ spec:
- --allowed-group=platform-admins
- --skip-provider-button=true
- --redirect-url=https://pihole.${BASE_DOMAIN}/oauth2/callback
- --cookie-domain=.${BASE_DOMAIN}
- --cookie-name=_oauth2_proxy_pihole
- --cookie-domain=pihole.${BASE_DOMAIN}
- --whitelist-domain=.${BASE_DOMAIN}
- --cookie-secure=true
- --cookie-refresh=2m30s
- --pass-access-token=true
- --set-xauthrequest=true
- --metrics-address=0.0.0.0:44180
env:
- name: OAUTH2_PROXY_CLIENT_ID
valueFrom:
@@ -133,6 +136,9 @@ spec:
- name: http
containerPort: 4180
protocol: TCP
- name: metrics
containerPort: 44180
protocol: TCP
resources:
requests:
cpu: 25m
+7 -1
View File
@@ -171,11 +171,14 @@ spec:
- --allowed-group=platform-admins
- --skip-provider-button=true
- --redirect-url=https://qbittorrent.${BASE_DOMAIN}/oauth2/callback
- --cookie-domain=.${BASE_DOMAIN}
- --cookie-name=_oauth2_proxy_qbittorrent
- --cookie-domain=qbittorrent.${BASE_DOMAIN}
- --whitelist-domain=.${BASE_DOMAIN}
- --cookie-secure=true
- --cookie-refresh=2m30s
- --pass-access-token=true
- --set-xauthrequest=true
- --metrics-address=0.0.0.0:44180
env:
- name: OAUTH2_PROXY_CLIENT_ID
valueFrom:
@@ -196,6 +199,9 @@ spec:
- name: http
containerPort: 4180
protocol: TCP
- name: metrics
containerPort: 44180
protocol: TCP
resources:
requests:
cpu: 25m
+7 -1
View File
@@ -153,11 +153,14 @@ spec:
- --allowed-group=platform-admins
- --skip-provider-button=true
- --redirect-url=https://radarr.${BASE_DOMAIN}/oauth2/callback
- --cookie-domain=.${BASE_DOMAIN}
- --cookie-name=_oauth2_proxy_radarr
- --cookie-domain=radarr.${BASE_DOMAIN}
- --whitelist-domain=.${BASE_DOMAIN}
- --cookie-secure=true
- --cookie-refresh=2m30s
- --pass-access-token=true
- --set-xauthrequest=true
- --metrics-address=0.0.0.0:44180
env:
- name: OAUTH2_PROXY_CLIENT_ID
valueFrom:
@@ -178,6 +181,9 @@ spec:
- name: http
containerPort: 4180
protocol: TCP
- name: metrics
containerPort: 44180
protocol: TCP
resources:
requests:
cpu: 25m
+7 -1
View File
@@ -153,11 +153,14 @@ spec:
- --allowed-group=platform-admins
- --skip-provider-button=true
- --redirect-url=https://sonarr.${BASE_DOMAIN}/oauth2/callback
- --cookie-domain=.${BASE_DOMAIN}
- --cookie-name=_oauth2_proxy_sonarr
- --cookie-domain=sonarr.${BASE_DOMAIN}
- --whitelist-domain=.${BASE_DOMAIN}
- --cookie-secure=true
- --cookie-refresh=2m30s
- --pass-access-token=true
- --set-xauthrequest=true
- --metrics-address=0.0.0.0:44180
env:
- name: OAUTH2_PROXY_CLIENT_ID
valueFrom:
@@ -178,6 +181,9 @@ spec:
- name: http
containerPort: 4180
protocol: TCP
- name: metrics
containerPort: 44180
protocol: TCP
resources:
requests:
cpu: 25m
+173 -3
View File
@@ -133,6 +133,36 @@ OAUTH2_PROXY_IMAGE = "quay.io/oauth2-proxy/oauth2-proxy:v7.8.1"
OAUTH2_PROXY_PORT = 4180
KEYCLOAK_ISSUER = f"https://keycloak.{ZONE}/realms/homelab"
# --- session lifetime -----------------------------------------------------------------
# Keycloak's `homelab` realm issues access tokens with a 300-SECOND lifetime. MEASURED on a
# live session, not read off a config page: `expires - created = 300.000s` exactly, with
# `refresh_token:true` on the same line — so the proxy HOLDS a refresh token it was never
# told to spend. `--cookie-refresh` defaults to 0, which the v7.8.1 binary's own help spells
# "0 to disable", so every one of these sidecars dropped its session five minutes after
# sign-in and sent the user back to Keycloak. Refresh at HALF the lifetime: two chances to
# renew before expiry, so one failed refresh is not an immediate logout.
#
# NOTE for anyone tempted to add `--session-cookie-minimal` to shrink the cookie: it is
# MUTUALLY EXCLUSIVE with this (provoked: "cookie_refresh > 0 requires oauth tokens in
# sessions"). Dropping --pass-access-token is a least-privilege argument, not a size fix.
OAUTH2_ACCESS_TOKEN_LIFETIME_S = 300
OAUTH2_COOKIE_REFRESH = "2m30s"
# --- metrics --------------------------------------------------------------------------
# oauth2-proxy serves /metrics only when --metrics-address is given; with it absent the
# listener never starts, so NO per-app sidecar was scrapable at all (measured: `ports` was
# `['http']` on all six). 44180 is the platform's existing convention, not a guess — the
# SHARED proxy already runs `--metrics-address=0.0.0.0:44180` with a `metrics` port and 2
# ready endpoints. The flag is confirmed present in the PINNED v7.8.1 binary (`--help`),
# which matters because the shared proxy is on v7.15.3 and could not have vouched for it.
#
# THIS IS THE PREREQUISITE ONLY, AND IT IS NOT YET SCRAPED. A container port is not a
# Service port: these sidecars' Services expose the app port and :4180, and each namespace's
# default-deny baseline has `ingress: []`, so Prometheus can neither resolve nor reach this
# port until a Service port (or PodMonitor), a monitoring-ingress allow and a ServiceMonitor
# are added. Do not read this flag as "metrics are working".
OAUTH2_PROXY_METRICS_PORT = 44180
# =============================================================================
# Defaults (renderer-contract.md "Default posture") — materialize BEFORE mapping.
@@ -971,7 +1001,11 @@ def _oauth2_sidecar_container(s: dict) -> dict:
auth.group (R-IDP-06: a valid session is not enough — the user must be in an authorized group,
else /oauth2 returns 403). client-id/secret + cookie-secret come by name from the SOPS-encrypted
`<app>-oauth2-proxy` Secret (R-IDP-04). Single provider => --skip-provider-button 302s straight
to Keycloak. The sidecar->app hop is pod-local (127.0.0.1) and not subject to network policy."""
to Keycloak. The sidecar->app hop is pod-local (127.0.0.1) and not subject to network policy.
--cookie-name and --cookie-domain are DERIVED per app (see the block comment on those two
args): every instance holds a different cookie-secret, so sharing one cookie name across the
zone makes the instances evict each other's sessions."""
route = s["ingressRoutes"][0]
host = route["host"]
upstream_port = route["port"]
@@ -991,11 +1025,64 @@ def _oauth2_sidecar_container(s: dict) -> dict:
args += [
"--skip-provider-button=true",
f"--redirect-url=https://{host}/oauth2/callback",
f"--cookie-domain=.{ZONE}",
# ── COOKIE ISOLATION (fleet fix 2026-09-30; crafty's 2026-09-29 fix, generalized) ──────
# EVERY oauth2-proxy on this platform — this sidecar, its four siblings, and the SHARED
# forward-auth proxy (platform/oauth2-proxy) — is an INDEPENDENT instance holding its OWN
# `cookie-secret`. Measured on prod 2026-09-30: seven `*-oauth2-proxy` Secrets, seven
# DISTINCT cookie-secret values, so no instance can decrypt any other's cookie.
#
# Left at oauth2-proxy's DEFAULTS (`_oauth2_proxy` / `_oauth2_proxy_csrf`) and scoped to
# `.${BASE_DOMAIN}`, the browser therefore keeps ONE cookie pair for ALL of them:
# whichever proxy authenticates last OVERWRITES every other's session. The loser logs
# "No valid authentication in request" and bounces to Keycloak, which — the SSO session
# still being live — redirects straight back and overwrites the cookie again. The
# user-visible symptom is "I signed into Keycloak but I'm still not signed in", and it
# sends you hunting in Keycloak, where nothing is wrong. Silent, intermittent, and
# misattributed: the exact shape this repo keeps getting burned by.
#
# WHY IT WAS *INTERMITTENT*, AND WHY RELOADING NEVER HELPED. The loser does not merely
# fail to read the cookie — it calls ClearSession, which EXPIRES the cookie on its own
# --cookie-domain, i.e. the whole zone. And the *arr UIs poll: measured on prod, radarr's
# rejections are `/api/v3/command`, `/api/v3/queue/details` and `/signalr/negotiate`,
# 155 of them in 12h against 1 successful auth. Every poll carrying a cookie radarr
# cannot decrypt calls ClearSession again — so A LEFT-OPEN RADARR TAB DELETES JACKETT'S
# COOKIE EVERY FEW SECONDS, from another namespace, with no user action at all. That is
# the intermittency, and it is why signing in again fixed nothing for longer than the
# gap between two polls. Host-scoping the cookie (below) is what contains the blast
# radius of a ClearSession to the app that issued it.
#
# DERIVED, NOT LISTED. Both flags come from the ServiceDefinition (`s['name']` and the
# route host), so a NEW forward-auth app is isolated the moment it is onboarded. A
# per-service table would leave the next app defaulting into the collision, which is how
# twelve ServiceMonitors acquired one identical wrong port name in a single edit.
# conformance/tests/l0-static/oauth2-proxy-cookie-names-distinct asserts both properties
# over the WHOLE tree and asserts THIS function derives rather than lists.
#
# --cookie-name a unique name per instance, so two sessions cannot alias at all.
# This is the fix; the one below is defence in depth.
# --cookie-domain HOST-scoped. A per-app reverse proxy has no reason to broadcast its
# session cookie to every other host in the zone — a zone-wide cookie
# is transmitted to every sibling app on `.${BASE_DOMAIN}`, so any
# FUTURE name collision would again be platform-wide instead of
# contained. The SHARED forward-auth proxy keeps the wide scope,
# because cross-host forward-auth is precisely its job.
#
# --whitelist-domain deliberately stays ZONE-WIDE: it governs permitted post-login
# REDIRECT targets, not cookie scope. Narrowing it here would break the sign-in bounce.
f"--cookie-name=_oauth2_proxy_{s['name']}",
f"--cookie-domain={host}",
f"--whitelist-domain=.{ZONE}",
"--cookie-secure=true",
# Spend the refresh token the proxy already holds, at half the 300s access-token
# lifetime. Without this the session dies 5 minutes after sign-in. See
# OAUTH2_ACCESS_TOKEN_LIFETIME_S above for the measurement and the
# --session-cookie-minimal incompatibility.
f"--cookie-refresh={OAUTH2_COOKIE_REFRESH}",
"--pass-access-token=true",
"--set-xauthrequest=true",
# Start the /metrics listener. Prerequisite only — not yet reachable by Prometheus;
# see OAUTH2_PROXY_METRICS_PORT above for exactly what is still missing.
f"--metrics-address=0.0.0.0:{OAUTH2_PROXY_METRICS_PORT}",
]
secret = f"{s['name']}-oauth2-proxy"
return {
@@ -1017,7 +1104,10 @@ def _oauth2_sidecar_container(s: dict) -> dict:
"valueFrom": {"secretKeyRef": {"name": secret, "key": "cookie-secret"}},
},
],
"ports": [{"name": "http", "containerPort": OAUTH2_PROXY_PORT, "protocol": "TCP"}],
"ports": [
{"name": "http", "containerPort": OAUTH2_PROXY_PORT, "protocol": "TCP"},
{"name": "metrics", "containerPort": OAUTH2_PROXY_METRICS_PORT, "protocol": "TCP"},
],
"resources": {
"requests": {"cpu": "25m", "memory": "64Mi"},
"limits": {"memory": "128Mi"},
@@ -2475,6 +2565,86 @@ def _selftest() -> int:
not any(a.startswith("--ssl-upstream-insecure-skip-verify") for a in side["args"]),
"http upstream must NOT skip TLS verify (that flag is only for crafty's self-signed https)",
)
# COOKIE ISOLATION. Every oauth2-proxy instance holds its own cookie-secret, so two instances
# sharing a cookie NAME on a shared DOMAIN evict each other's sessions silently. Both flags
# must be DERIVED from this service, not defaulted and not listed.
check(
"--cookie-name=_oauth2_proxy_fa" in side["args"],
"sidecar must declare a cookie name DERIVED from the service name — the oauth2-proxy "
"default (_oauth2_proxy) is shared with every other instance on the zone",
)
check(
"--cookie-domain=fa.home.keithjackson.dev" in side["args"],
"sidecar cookie-domain must be HOST-scoped (the app's own host), not zone-wide",
)
check(
f"--whitelist-domain=.{ZONE}" in side["args"],
"whitelist-domain must stay ZONE-wide — it governs post-login redirect targets, not "
"cookie scope; narrowing it breaks the sign-in bounce",
)
# SESSION LIFETIME. `--cookie-refresh` must be present AND strictly shorter than the
# measured 300s access-token lifetime, or the session dies mid-use. Asserted as a parsed
# duration rather than a string match, so "2m30s" -> "150s" -> "2.5m" stays green and a
# silent widening past the token lifetime does not.
refresh = next((a.split("=", 1)[1] for a in side["args"]
if a.startswith("--cookie-refresh=")), None)
check(refresh is not None,
"sidecar must set --cookie-refresh; the v7.8.1 default is 0 = DISABLED, so the "
"session dies when the access token expires and the user is bounced to Keycloak")
if refresh is not None:
_m = re.fullmatch(r"(?:(\d+)m)?(?:(\d+(?:\.\d+)?)s)?", refresh)
_secs = (int(_m.group(1) or 0) * 60 + float(_m.group(2) or 0)) if _m else -1
check(0 < _secs < OAUTH2_ACCESS_TOKEN_LIFETIME_S,
f"--cookie-refresh={refresh} parses to {_secs}s, which is not inside "
f"(0, {OAUTH2_ACCESS_TOKEN_LIFETIME_S}s). A refresh at or past the access-token "
f"lifetime never renews in time, which is the same logout it was added to stop")
check(
not any(a.startswith("--session-cookie-minimal") for a in side["args"]),
"--session-cookie-minimal is MUTUALLY EXCLUSIVE with --cookie-refresh "
"('cookie_refresh > 0 requires oauth tokens in sessions') — the proxy refuses to start",
)
# METRICS. The listener does not exist unless the flag is given, and the port must be
# DECLARED or nothing can ever select it (neither a Service port nor a PodMonitor).
check(
f"--metrics-address=0.0.0.0:{OAUTH2_PROXY_METRICS_PORT}" in side["args"],
"sidecar must start the /metrics listener; without --metrics-address it is not merely "
"unscraped, it is not serving at all",
)
check(
[p["name"] for p in side["ports"]] == ["http", "metrics"]
and {p["containerPort"] for p in side["ports"]}
== {OAUTH2_PROXY_PORT, OAUTH2_PROXY_METRICS_PORT},
"sidecar must declare BOTH the http and metrics container ports — an undeclared port "
"cannot be named by a Service port or a PodMonitor, so the flag alone is inert",
)
# Two forward-auth apps must not be able to collide. Renders a SECOND one and compares, so a
# future refactor to a constant (or to a per-service table with a copy-paste slip) fails here
# rather than silently in a browser six weeks later.
fa2_side = next(
c
for c in next(
d[1]
for d in render(
{
"name": "fa2",
"source": {"image": "a:1"},
"ingressRoutes": [{"host": "fa2.home.keithjackson.dev", "port": 9118}],
"auth": {"mode": "forward-auth", "groups": ["media-users"]},
}
)
if d[1]["kind"] == "Deployment"
)["spec"]["template"]["spec"]["containers"]
if c["name"] == "oauth2-proxy"
)
def _cookie_name(container):
return next(a for a in container["args"] if a.startswith("--cookie-name="))
check(
_cookie_name(side) != _cookie_name(fa2_side),
"two forward-auth apps rendered IDENTICAL cookie names — they would overwrite each "
"other's session on every sign-in (the 2026-09-29 crafty defect, fleet-wide)",
)
check(
side["env"][0]["valueFrom"]["secretKeyRef"]["name"] == "fa-oauth2-proxy",
"sidecar creds must come by name from the per-app <app>-oauth2-proxy Secret (R-IDP-04)",
@@ -0,0 +1,152 @@
# =============================================================================
# L0 STATIC — no two oauth2-proxy instances can share a browser cookie
# Catalog: docs/14 L0 row ("Pre-apply, in CI") — runs WITHOUT a cluster.
#
# THE DEFECT THIS CLOSES. Every oauth2-proxy on this platform is an INDEPENDENT instance with
# its OWN `cookie-secret`: five per-app reverse-proxy sidecars (jackett, pihole, qbittorrent,
# radarr, sonarr), crafty's, and the SHARED forward-auth proxy. Measured on prod 2026-09-30:
# seven `*-oauth2-proxy` Secrets, SEVEN DISTINCT cookie-secret values — so no instance can
# decrypt any other's cookie.
#
# They were all emitting oauth2-proxy's DEFAULT cookie names (`_oauth2_proxy` and
# `_oauth2_proxy_csrf`), scoped to `.${BASE_DOMAIN}`. A cookie is keyed by (name, domain, path),
# so the browser kept ONE pair for ALL of them. Whichever proxy authenticated last OVERWROTE
# every other's session; the loser logged `No valid authentication in request`, bounced to
# Keycloak, and — the SSO session still being live — was redirected straight back and overwrote
# the cookie again. Six live instances, one cookie, mutual eviction.
#
# WHY IT IS THE WORST KIND OF BUG. The symptom is "I signed into Keycloak but I'm still not
# signed in", which points the investigator at Keycloak, where nothing is wrong. It is
# INTERMITTENT — it only appears once a browser has visited a SECOND gated app, so the obvious
# single-app reproduction succeeds — and it is SILENT: every Deployment stays Ready, every
# Kustomization stays Ready, the proxy's own log line names an authentication failure rather
# than a collision. It went unnoticed across five services for the whole life of the pattern,
# and was found only as a side effect of investigating something else (2026-09-29, crafty).
#
# WHY A COMMIT IS NOT ENOUGH, AND THIS IS A GATE STAGE. The collision is a property of the
# PATTERN, not of any one app: the next forward-auth service onboarded inherits the defect by
# doing nothing at all, because a missing flag IS the bug. Nothing about its absence is loud.
# This is the same shape as the twelve inert ServiceMonitors in this tree — one omission,
# copied, invisible for weeks — and the same remedy: make the omission fail the merge.
#
# GIVEN every oauth2-proxy instance this repo authors — a container in any manifest (the
# rendered sidecars in apps/, crafty's hand-authored one in platform/) and the shared
# proxy's HelmRelease values,
# WHEN each instance's EFFECTIVE cookie name is resolved (its declared `--cookie-name` /
# `OAUTH2_PROXY_COOKIE_NAME`, or oauth2-proxy's built-in default `_oauth2_proxy` when it
# declares none — an omission is a NAME, not an absence, and that is the whole bug),
# THEN (1) no two instances share an effective cookie name;
# (2) no instance's effective name is another's name + `_csrf` — oauth2-proxy derives the
# CSRF cookie that way, so `_oauth2_proxy` and `_oauth2_proxy_csrf` as two SESSION
# names would collide on the second cookie while looking distinct on the first;
# (3) the DEFAULT name has exactly ONE owner and it is the instance declared in
# SHARED_DEFAULT_COOKIE_OWNER. This is the deliberate ASYMMETRY. The shared
# forward-auth proxy MUST keep `_oauth2_proxy`: it is the single session every
# OTHER forward-auth-gated surface on the platform rides on, so renaming it signs
# every one of them out at once. The rule is therefore NOT "every instance must
# declare a name" — it is "the default is a NAME LIKE ANY OTHER, held by exactly one
# REGISTERED owner". That formulation needs no exemption from (1), and it closes the
# hole an exemption would leave: if the shared proxy is ever removed, an app silently
# inheriting the default would still FAIL here instead of quietly becoming its heir;
# (4) every instance that is NOT that owner is HOST-SCOPED: its `--cookie-domain` equals
# the host of its own `--redirect-url`. See the argument below;
# (5) catalog/render.py DERIVES both flags from the ServiceDefinition (the service name
# and the route host) and does not carry a per-service table. A list is how twelve
# ServiceMonitors acquired one identical wrong port name in a single edit, and a list
# leaves the NEXT app defaulting into the collision;
# (6) the SHIPPED renderer is proven END-TO-END on synthetic ServiceDefinitions, run as a
# subprocess: two forward-auth fixtures must yield two different, non-default cookie
# names, each scoped to its own host. Without this, once the tree is compliant (1)-(4)
# are satisfied by a tree with nothing left to catch, and a guard whose only evidence
# is "nothing failed" cannot be told apart from one that stopped working;
# AND (7) the check is LOAD-BEARING: this Test DECLARES `conformance.home.k3s/scope:
# whole-repo`, so ci/l0.sh Stage 3b's `--include-scope whole-repo` unions it into
# EVERY gate run, and ci/gate.sh blocks the merge when the l0 stage fails. It
# deliberately adds NO stage to ci/l0.sh — tests/l0-static/whole-repo-invariants-wired
# fails the gate if anyone adds one.
#
# WHY SCOPE, NOT REQUIREMENTS: ci/touched-requirements.sh maps `apps/*` to R-IDP-02/R-IDP-06
# today, but the instances live in THREE unrelated subtrees (apps/, platform/crafty/,
# platform/oauth2-proxy/) and the file most likely to reintroduce the defect is
# catalog/render.py, which maps to R-GITOPS-02 and to no identity requirement at all. A
# requirement-scoped selection would filter this check out of exactly the change that breaks it.
#
# ON ASSERTION (4), HOST-SCOPED COOKIE-DOMAIN — the argument, and the decision.
# AGAINST asserting it (overreach): distinct NAMES already close the eviction bug completely.
# Two cookies with different names do not overwrite each other however wide their domains are,
# so (4) fixes nothing that (1) has not already fixed. `--cookie-domain` is also a legitimate
# knob — a future proxy fronting two hostnames of one app would need a wider value — and a
# check that fails correct configurations is a check someone eventually disables.
# FOR asserting it (and this wins): a zone-wide cookie is TRANSMITTED BY THE BROWSER TO EVERY
# HOST IN THE ZONE. qBittorrent's session token is therefore sent to pihole, to radarr, to
# sonarr, and to every other name under `.${BASE_DOMAIN}` — including hosts behind no proxy at
# all. That is a session-credential disclosure across trust boundaries that no one needs and
# nobody asked for; the sidecar's session is only ever meaningful to the one app it fronts.
# And it is what makes a FUTURE name collision catastrophic rather than contained: with
# host-scoped cookies, two instances that accidentally share a name cannot even see each
# other's cookie, so the failure this whole test exists to prevent degrades from platform-wide
# to nothing. Defence in depth on the exact axis that already failed once.
# DECISION: assert it, for every instance except the registered shared proxy — whose whole
# job IS cross-host forward-auth, and which is exempted by name and with a reason, not by
# loosening the rule. `--whitelist-domain` is deliberately NOT touched: it governs permitted
# post-login REDIRECT targets, not cookie scope, and narrowing it breaks the sign-in bounce.
#
# STATUS: EXECUTABLE. `check.sh` is an offline assertion script (PyYAML, as catalog/render.py
# and the sibling l0-static checks use); conformance/run.sh --layer l0 and ci/l0.sh run it
# directly, and this Chainsaw Test wraps the SAME script.
#
# NOT proven (honest gaps; this is STATIC, with no cluster and no browser):
# - That anyone can actually sign in. No browser round-trip is performed, and none can be
# from L0. The 2026-09-29 crafty entry recorded the same gap and it is still open: the
# symptom has never been REPRODUCED in a browser, so this is a latent-bug fix reasoned from
# measured configuration, not a fix watched to work.
# - That the LIVE pods carry what the tree says. git is not the cluster (CLAUDE.md §2b). The
# live flags were measured separately, once, by hand; nothing here re-measures them, and a
# hand-applied drift would not be visible to this check.
# - That the cookie-secrets really differ. That is a Secret comparison and belongs in-cluster;
# it was measured out of band (seven distinct values, compared without printing any of
# them). If they were ever made IDENTICAL the collision would become harmless — but sharing
# one session-encryption key across trust zones is a worse idea than the bug it would mask,
# so this check does not offer it as an alternative and does not look for it.
# - Anything about the CONTENT of a session, group authorization, or the CSRF cookie's own
# behaviour. Names and domains only.
# - It does not read ../home-network-k3s. The spec is read-only (R-TEST-06).
# =============================================================================
apiVersion: chainsaw.kyverno.io/v1alpha1
kind: Test
metadata:
name: oauth2-proxy-cookie-names-distinct
labels:
conformance.home.k3s/R-IDP-02: "true"
conformance.home.k3s/R-IDP-06: "true"
annotations:
conformance.home.k3s/requirements: "R-IDP-02, R-IDP-06"
conformance.home.k3s/layer: "L0"
# WHOLE-REPO SCOPE — the instances span apps/wave-0, apps/wave-1, platform/crafty and
# platform/oauth2-proxy, and the generator that emits five of them is catalog/render.py.
# No single requirement path-maps to that set, and the renderer maps to no identity
# requirement at all, so a requirement-scoped selection would skip this check on precisely
# the change that can reintroduce the defect fleet-wide in one edit.
conformance.home.k3s/scope: "whole-repo"
conformance.home.k3s/safety-critical: "false"
conformance.home.k3s/executable: "true"
conformance.home.k3s/intent: >-
No two oauth2-proxy instances can share a browser cookie: every instance's effective
cookie name is unique, the built-in default belongs to exactly one registered owner (the
shared forward-auth proxy, which cannot be renamed without signing every gated app out),
every other instance is host-scoped, and catalog/render.py derives both flags from the
ServiceDefinition rather than from a per-service list — proven end-to-end on synthetic
fixtures so the guard stays falsifiable once the tree is clean.
spec:
steps:
- name: assert-no-two-oauth2-proxy-instances-share-a-cookie
description: >-
Inventory every oauth2-proxy container and HelmRelease in the tree, resolve each one's
effective cookie name (declared, or oauth2-proxy's default when omitted), assert
pairwise distinctness including the session/CSRF derivation, ratchet the single
registered owner of the default name, assert host-scoped cookie-domain on every other
instance, assert catalog/render.py derives rather than lists, and prove the shipped
renderer on two synthetic forward-auth ServiceDefinitions.
try:
- script:
content: bash ./check.sh
@@ -0,0 +1,498 @@
#!/usr/bin/env bash
# =============================================================================
# L0 STATIC CHECK — no two oauth2-proxy instances can share a browser cookie.
# See chainsaw-test.yaml's header for WHY this exists, what it measured, and the argument
# for assertion (4). In one paragraph:
#
# Every oauth2-proxy here holds its OWN cookie-secret (seven distinct values on prod,
# 2026-09-30), so two instances sharing a cookie NAME on a shared DOMAIN cannot read each
# other's session — they OVERWRITE it. The loser bounces to Keycloak, is redirected straight
# back by the live SSO session, and overwrites the winner in turn. The symptom is "I signed
# into Keycloak but I'm still not signed in", it only shows up after a second gated app is
# visited, and nothing in the cluster reports an error. A missing --cookie-name IS the bug,
# so the next forward-auth app inherits it by doing nothing.
#
# Exit 0 = all assertions pass. Exit 1 = a failure. Exit 3 (honest SKIP, which the runner
# turns into rc 3 = UNWIRED, never green, because this test declares the whole-repo scope)
# only if the tree contains no oauth2-proxy instance at all — genuinely nothing to audit.
# =============================================================================
set -euo pipefail
DIR="$(cd "$(dirname "${BASH_SOURCE[0]}")" && pwd)"
ROOT="$(cd "${DIR}/../../../.." && pwd)" # repo root
PYTHON="${PYTHON:-python3}"
# Honest SKIP (never green for a scope-declaring test) if there is nothing to audit at all.
# Matches the IMAGE every instance runs and the CHART the shared one installs; if NEITHER
# appears anywhere, the forward-auth pattern has left this repo and the check has no subject.
#
# ANCHORED ON `image:` DELIBERATELY. A bare `oauth2-proxy/oauth2-proxy:` also matches
# platform/oauth2-proxy/forward-auth-cec.yaml's Envoy cluster reference
# (`serviceName: oauth2-proxy/oauth2-proxy:80` — namespace/service:port, not a registry path).
# That file configures the ext_authz listener that CALLS the proxy; it runs no proxy and holds
# no cookie flags, so counting it made the grep/parse cross-check below report a phantom
# unaudited instance.
if ! grep -rlE 'image:[[:space:]]*[^[:space:]]*oauth2-proxy|chart:[[:space:]]*oauth2-proxy' \
"${ROOT}/apps" "${ROOT}/platform" "${ROOT}/catalog" >/dev/null 2>&1; then
echo "check SKIPPED: no oauth2-proxy image or chart found under apps/, platform/ or catalog/ — nothing to audit" >&2
exit 3
fi
cd "${ROOT}"
"${PYTHON}" - "${ROOT}" <<'PY'
"""Static audit: no two oauth2-proxy instances can share a browser cookie.
PyYAML (the same dependency as catalog/render.py and the sibling l0-static checks) rather
than line-based parsing: a container's args live in a nested structure and a HelmRelease's
flags live in a values map, and a line-based reader of either is precisely the approximate
parser that silently stops matching — the failure class this check exists to prevent.
"""
from __future__ import annotations
import re
import subprocess
import sys
import tempfile
from pathlib import Path
try:
import yaml
except ImportError: # pragma: no cover
print("check FAIL: PyYAML is required (same dependency as catalog/render.py)",
file=sys.stderr)
raise SystemExit(1)
ROOT = Path(sys.argv[1])
sys.dont_write_bytecode = True # keep __pycache__ out of the tracked tree
FAILURES: list[str] = []
CHECKS = 0
def check(cond, msg):
global CHECKS
CHECKS += 1
if not cond:
FAILURES.append(msg)
def read(p: Path) -> str:
try:
return p.read_text()
except (OSError, UnicodeDecodeError):
return ""
# oauth2-proxy's OWN built-in defaults (pkg/apis/options/cookie.go): the session cookie is
# `_oauth2_proxy` and the CSRF cookie is that name with `_csrf` appended. An instance that
# declares nothing is NOT unconfigured — it has claimed this exact name, which is why the
# inventory below treats the default as a name like any other rather than as an absence.
DEFAULT_COOKIE_NAME = "_oauth2_proxy"
CSRF_SUFFIX = "_csrf"
# =============================================================================================
# REGISTER — SHARED_DEFAULT_COOKIE_OWNER. Exactly one entry, and it must match a real instance.
#
# The one instance permitted to hold DEFAULT_COOKIE_NAME, and the one permitted a zone-wide
# cookie-domain. Both exemptions belong to the SAME object for the SAME reason, so they are one
# register rather than two: the shared forward-auth proxy is not a per-app sidecar, it is the
# single session that every forward-auth-gated surface on the platform rides on. Renaming its
# cookie signs all of them out simultaneously, and host-scoping it would break the cross-host
# forward-auth that is its entire job.
#
# Shrink-only, and exact in BOTH directions: an entry that matches no instance FAILS as stale
# (the proxy was renamed or removed and the exemption is now a hole), and an instance holding
# the default WITHOUT an entry FAILS as an unregistered heir. Adding an entry is a review event
# on a sensitive path.
#
# Keyed by "<relpath>:<instance id>".
# =============================================================================================
SHARED_DEFAULT_COOKIE_OWNER: dict[str, str] = {
"platform/oauth2-proxy/helmrelease.yaml:oauth2-proxy":
"The SHARED forward-auth proxy (ADR-0014, platform/oauth2-proxy/README.md). It is the "
"single authenticator behind every forward-auth-gated surface that is NOT fronted by "
"its own sidecar, so its cookie is the platform session: renaming it signs every one "
"of them out at once, and that is why the 2026-09-29 crafty fix changed only the "
"sidecar side. Its cookie-domain is zone-wide for the same structural reason — "
"cross-host forward-auth is what it is for.",
}
def is_test_fixture(p: Path) -> bool:
"""conformance/tests/**/{golden,fixtures}/** is assertion DATA, not deployed manifests.
Auditing a golden would be auditing a copy of something already audited through apps/.
Same exclusion the sibling l0-static checks make, and the same "reference, not
declaration" distinction ci/touched-requirements.sh draws for fixture paths.
"""
parts = p.parts
return "conformance" in parts and ("golden" in parts or "fixtures" in parts)
def iter_containers(node):
"""Yield every container mapping under any `containers`/`initContainers` list, at any depth.
Depth-agnostic on purpose: a sidecar sits under spec.template.spec.containers in a
Deployment, but the same container shape appears under a CronJob's jobTemplate, a
DaemonSet, or a Pod, and a reader that hardcoded one path would silently stop seeing an
instance the day one moved.
"""
if isinstance(node, dict):
for key, val in node.items():
if key in ("containers", "initContainers") and isinstance(val, list):
for c in val:
if isinstance(c, dict):
yield c
else:
yield from iter_containers(val)
elif isinstance(node, list):
for item in node:
yield from iter_containers(item)
def flag_from_args(args: list, flag: str):
"""Value of `--flag=value` or `--flag value` in an argv list, else None."""
pref = "--" + flag
for i, a in enumerate(args):
if not isinstance(a, str):
continue
if a.startswith(pref + "="):
return a.split("=", 1)[1]
if a == pref and i + 1 < len(args) and isinstance(args[i + 1], str):
return args[i + 1]
return None
def host_of(url):
"""Host part of an https://host/path URL, else None."""
if not isinstance(url, str):
return None
m = re.match(r"^https?://([^/]+)", url)
return m.group(1) if m else None
# ============================================================ (0) INVENTORY
# instances: list of dicts {rel, ident, kind, declared_name, cookie_domain, redirect_host}
instances: list[dict] = []
unparseable: list[str] = []
# Files the grep gate says contain an instance, so the parse can be cross-checked against it.
grep_files: set[str] = set()
for p in sorted(ROOT.rglob("*.yaml")):
relparts = p.relative_to(ROOT).parent.parts
# NESTED WORKTREES: skip dot-DIRECTORIES (.git, .claude) while still matching dot-FILES
# such as .sops.yaml. .claude/worktrees/agent-*/ holds full repo copies for isolated agent
# runs, so a bare rglob audited up to 18 duplicates of every file — which both invents
# FAILs and, worse, can satisfy a "something declares X" check from a copy rather than from
# real source. Same fix as egress-paths-selected-by-rules. .claude/ is gitignored.
if any(part.startswith(".") for part in relparts) or is_test_fixture(p) or ".sops." in p.name:
continue
txt = read(p)
if not txt:
continue
rel = str(p.relative_to(ROOT))
# Same anchoring as check.sh's skip gate: `image:` (or a chart name), never a bare path —
# see the comment there for the Envoy `serviceName: oauth2-proxy/oauth2-proxy:80` near-miss.
if re.search(r"image:\s*\S*oauth2-proxy|chart:\s*oauth2-proxy", txt):
grep_files.add(rel)
elif "oauth2-proxy" not in txt:
continue
try:
docs = [d for d in yaml.safe_load_all(txt) if isinstance(d, dict)]
except yaml.YAMLError as exc:
unparseable.append(f"{rel} ({exc})")
continue
for d in docs:
# --- shape 1: a container running the oauth2-proxy image -------------------------
for c in iter_containers(d):
image = str(c.get("image") or "")
name = str(c.get("name") or "")
if "oauth2-proxy" not in image and name != "oauth2-proxy":
continue
args = [a for a in (list(c.get("args") or []) + list(c.get("command") or []))]
env = {e.get("name"): e.get("value")
for e in (c.get("env") or []) if isinstance(e, dict) and "value" in e}
owner = (d.get("metadata") or {}).get("name") or "?"
instances.append({
"rel": rel,
"ident": f"{owner}/{name or 'oauth2-proxy'}",
"kind": "container",
"declared_name": flag_from_args(args, "cookie-name")
or env.get("OAUTH2_PROXY_COOKIE_NAME"),
"cookie_domain": flag_from_args(args, "cookie-domain")
or env.get("OAUTH2_PROXY_COOKIE_DOMAIN"),
"redirect_host": host_of(flag_from_args(args, "redirect-url")
or env.get("OAUTH2_PROXY_REDIRECT_URL")),
})
# --- shape 2: the shared proxy's HelmRelease values ------------------------------
if d.get("kind") != "HelmRelease":
continue
spec = d.get("spec") or {}
chart = (((spec.get("chart") or {}).get("spec") or {}).get("chart") or "")
if "oauth2-proxy" not in str(chart):
continue
values = spec.get("values") or {}
extra = values.get("extraArgs") or {}
if isinstance(extra, list): # the chart also accepts a bare argv list
extra = {a.lstrip("-").split("=", 1)[0]: a.split("=", 1)[1]
for a in extra if isinstance(a, str) and "=" in a}
cfg = values.get("config") or {}
get = lambda k: extra.get(k, cfg.get(k)) # noqa: E731 - two-source lookup, used 3x
instances.append({
"rel": rel,
"ident": str((d.get("metadata") or {}).get("name") or "oauth2-proxy"),
"kind": "helmrelease",
"declared_name": get("cookie-name"),
"cookie_domain": get("cookie-domain"),
"redirect_host": host_of(get("redirect-url")),
})
for u in unparseable:
check(False, f"{u} is not parseable YAML — every oauth2-proxy instance in it went unaudited")
for ins in instances:
ins["key"] = f"{ins['rel']}:{ins['ident']}"
# THE CORE MODELLING DECISION: an omitted --cookie-name is not "unset", it is a CLAIM on
# oauth2-proxy's built-in default. Resolving it here is what lets assertion (1) below be a
# plain distinctness test with no special case, and it is exactly the step whose absence
# made the defect invisible to every reviewer who read these manifests.
ins["effective_name"] = ins["declared_name"] or DEFAULT_COOKIE_NAME
# Anti-vacuous. The floor is deliberately low (a real removal should not turn this check red),
# so the load-bearing guard is the grep/parse CROSS-CHECK beneath it: every file the cheap
# text scan says holds an instance must yield at least one PARSED instance. A parser that
# quietly stopped matching would keep the floor and fail this.
check(len(instances) >= 5,
f"only {len(instances)} oauth2-proxy instance(s) parsed out of the tree. This repo "
f"authors more than that (five rendered sidecars, crafty's, and the shared proxy), so "
f"the inventory has stopped seeing instances and every assertion below would pass "
f"vacuously while a collision went unaudited")
parsed_files = {ins["rel"] for ins in instances}
for rel in sorted(grep_files - parsed_files):
check(False,
f"{rel} contains an oauth2-proxy image or chart reference but NO instance was parsed "
f"out of it. Either it uses a shape iter_containers()/the HelmRelease reader does not "
f"recognise, or the file stopped parsing. Its cookie configuration is UNAUDITED, which "
f"is the same state the whole fleet was in before this check existed")
# ============================================================ (1) DISTINCT EFFECTIVE NAMES
by_name: dict[str, list[dict]] = {}
for ins in instances:
by_name.setdefault(ins["effective_name"], []).append(ins)
for nm, group in sorted(by_name.items()):
if len(group) < 2:
continue
who = ", ".join(sorted(g["key"] for g in group))
default_note = (
" Every one of them OMITS --cookie-name, so they are all claiming oauth2-proxy's "
"built-in default. Omitting the flag is not neutral: it IS this collision."
if nm == DEFAULT_COOKIE_NAME else "")
check(False,
f"{len(group)} oauth2-proxy instances share the cookie name '{nm}': {who}.{default_note}\n"
f" WHY THIS IS A BUG AND NOT A STYLE RULE: these are INDEPENDENT instances with "
f"DIFFERENT cookie-secrets (measured on prod 2026-09-30: seven distinct values), so "
f"neither can DECRYPT the other's cookie — it can only OVERWRITE it. A browser keys a "
f"cookie by (name, domain, path), so signing into one app destroys the session of every "
f"other app sharing that key. The loser logs 'No valid authentication in request', "
f"bounces to Keycloak, is redirected straight back because the SSO session is still "
f"live, and overwrites the winner in turn. The user sees 'I signed into Keycloak but "
f"I'm still not signed in' and goes looking in Keycloak, where nothing is wrong.\n"
f" FIX: give each per-app instance its own --cookie-name. For a service rendered "
f"from catalog/, do NOT hand-edit the golden — catalog/render.py derives the flag from "
f"the service name; re-render instead (ci/render-golden.sh's header has the canonical "
f"command). Exactly one instance may hold '{DEFAULT_COOKIE_NAME}', and it must be the "
f"one registered in SHARED_DEFAULT_COOKIE_OWNER.")
# ============================================================ (2) SESSION vs CSRF DERIVATION
# oauth2-proxy names the CSRF cookie <cookie-name>_csrf. So a SESSION name that happens to equal
# another instance's name + "_csrf" collides on the CSRF cookie while assertion (1) sees two
# perfectly distinct strings. This is the near-miss the obvious fix invites: naming the shared
# proxy's neighbour `_oauth2_proxy_csrf` reads as "clearly different" and is not.
effective = {ins["effective_name"] for ins in instances}
for ins in sorted(instances, key=lambda i: i["key"]):
base = ins["effective_name"]
if not base.endswith(CSRF_SUFFIX):
continue
victim = base[: -len(CSRF_SUFFIX)]
check(victim not in effective,
f"{ins['key']} uses the SESSION cookie name '{base}', which is exactly the CSRF cookie "
f"oauth2-proxy derives for the instance named '{victim}' (it appends '{CSRF_SUFFIX}'). "
f"The two session names look distinct and the CSRF cookies collide, so sign-in breaks "
f"with a state-mismatch instead of a session loss — the same bug wearing a different "
f"error message. Pick a name that is not another instance's name + '{CSRF_SUFFIX}'")
# ============================================================ (3) THE DEFAULT HAS ONE OWNER
default_holders = sorted(ins["key"] for ins in instances
if ins["effective_name"] == DEFAULT_COOKIE_NAME)
registered = set(SHARED_DEFAULT_COOKIE_OWNER)
for key in sorted(registered - set(ins["key"] for ins in instances)):
check(False,
f"SHARED_DEFAULT_COOKIE_OWNER registers '{key}', but no such oauth2-proxy instance "
f"exists in the tree. The register is SHRINK-ONLY and exact: a stale entry is a "
f"standing exemption for an object that is gone, so the next instance to inherit the "
f"default name would be silently excused. Remove the entry, or restore the instance")
for key in default_holders:
check(key in registered,
f"{key} holds oauth2-proxy's DEFAULT cookie name '{DEFAULT_COOKIE_NAME}' but is NOT "
f"registered in SHARED_DEFAULT_COOKIE_OWNER. Exactly ONE instance may hold the default, "
f"and it is the SHARED forward-auth proxy — whose cookie is the platform-wide session "
f"every forward-auth-gated surface rides on, so renaming IT signs them all out at once. "
f"Every other instance must declare its own --cookie-name. If this instance really is "
f"the new shared proxy, register it here with the reason; if it is a per-app sidecar, "
f"give it a unique name")
check(len(default_holders) <= 1,
f"{len(default_holders)} instances hold the default cookie name: {', '.join(default_holders)}. "
f"The default is a NAME, not an absence — it can have exactly one owner")
# ============================================================ (4) HOST-SCOPED COOKIE DOMAIN
# See the chainsaw-test header for the argument (distinct names alone already fix the eviction;
# host-scoping is asserted anyway because a zone-wide cookie is TRANSMITTED to every host in the
# zone, and because it makes a future name collision contained instead of platform-wide).
for ins in sorted(instances, key=lambda i: i["key"]):
if ins["key"] in registered:
continue # the shared proxy: zone-wide by design, registered
dom, rhost = ins["cookie_domain"], ins["redirect_host"]
check(dom is not None,
f"{ins['key']} declares no --cookie-domain. oauth2-proxy then scopes the cookie to the "
f"request host, which happens to be correct — but it is correct BY ACCIDENT and says "
f"nothing to the next reader. Declare it explicitly as this app's own host")
if dom is None:
continue
check(not dom.startswith("."),
f"{ins['key']} sets --cookie-domain={dom}. A leading dot makes the cookie ZONE-WIDE: "
f"the browser sends this app's session token to every other host under that domain, "
f"including hosts behind no proxy at all, and it is what turns any future cookie-name "
f"collision into a platform-wide outage instead of a contained one. Scope it to this "
f"app's own host. Only the registered shared forward-auth proxy may be zone-wide, "
f"because cross-host forward-auth is its job")
if rhost:
check(dom == rhost,
f"{ins['key']} sets --cookie-domain={dom} but its --redirect-url host is {rhost}. "
f"The cookie is then set for a domain the sign-in flow never returns to (or for a "
f"wider one than this app owns), so the session either does not stick or leaks "
f"beyond the app. Both flags describe the SAME app: make them agree")
# ============================================================ (5) THE RENDERER DERIVES
# Five of these instances are GENERATED. Auditing only the goldens would let someone "fix" the
# tree by hand and leave the generator emitting the defect for the next service onboarded — and
# the next re-render would then silently revert the hand fix.
render_py = ROOT / "catalog" / "render.py"
check(render_py.is_file(),
"catalog/render.py is missing — the generator of five of these instances cannot be audited")
if render_py.is_file():
src = read(render_py)
m = re.search(r"def _oauth2_sidecar_container\(.*?\n(?=\n*def |\n*# =)", src, re.S)
fn = m.group(0) if m else ""
check(bool(fn),
"could not locate _oauth2_sidecar_container() in catalog/render.py. It was renamed or "
"removed; assertions (5) below cannot run, and the generator is unaudited")
if fn:
cookie_name_lines = [ln for ln in fn.splitlines() if "--cookie-name" in ln]
check(bool(cookie_name_lines),
"catalog/render.py's _oauth2_sidecar_container() emits NO --cookie-name at all, so "
"every service it renders claims oauth2-proxy's default and collides with every "
"other. This is the defect itself, back in the one place that reintroduces it "
"fleet-wide in a single edit")
check(any("s['name']" in ln or 's["name"]' in ln for ln in cookie_name_lines),
"catalog/render.py emits --cookie-name without DERIVING it from the "
"ServiceDefinition's own name. A constant collides with every sibling by "
"construction; a per-service table leaves the NEXT app onboarded defaulting into "
"the collision, which is how twelve ServiceMonitors acquired one identical wrong "
"port name in a single edit. Derive it from s['name']")
cookie_dom_lines = [ln for ln in fn.splitlines() if "--cookie-domain" in ln]
check(any("{host}" in ln for ln in cookie_dom_lines),
"catalog/render.py's sidecar --cookie-domain is not derived from the route host. A "
"zone-wide literal (`.{ZONE}`) broadcasts every app's session cookie across the "
"whole zone — see assertion (4)")
check(not any(re.search(r"--cookie-name=_oauth2_proxy_[a-z0-9]", ln) for ln in cookie_name_lines),
"catalog/render.py hardcodes a literal service name into --cookie-name. Whatever "
"service that is, every OTHER service now renders the same constant and they all "
"collide. Derive the name instead")
# ============================================================ (6) PROVE THE SHIPPED RENDERER
# Once the tree is compliant, (1)-(4) have nothing left to catch and their passing is evidence
# of nothing. This runs the SHIPPED renderer as a SUBPROCESS on two synthetic ServiceDefinitions
# and asserts the property directly, so the guard stays falsifiable.
def _sd(name: str, port: int) -> str:
return yaml.safe_dump({
"name": name,
"kind": "container",
"source": {"image": "example/app:1"},
"exposure": "internal",
"ingressRoutes": [{"host": f"{name}.home.keithjackson.dev", "port": port}],
"auth": {"mode": "forward-auth", "groups": ["platform-admins"]},
}, sort_keys=False)
def _sidecar_args(rendered: str) -> list:
for doc in yaml.safe_load_all(rendered):
if not isinstance(doc, dict) or doc.get("kind") != "Deployment":
continue
for c in iter_containers(doc):
if c.get("name") == "oauth2-proxy":
return list(c.get("args") or [])
return []
if render_py.is_file():
fixtures = {"cookiefixa": 8111, "cookiefixb": 8112}
rendered_args: dict[str, list] = {}
with tempfile.TemporaryDirectory() as td:
for svc, port in fixtures.items():
f = Path(td) / f"{svc}.yaml"
f.write_text(_sd(svc, port))
proc = subprocess.run([sys.executable, str(render_py), str(f)],
capture_output=True, text=True)
check(proc.returncode == 0,
f"the shipped catalog/render.py failed on a synthetic forward-auth fixture "
f"({svc}): rc={proc.returncode} {proc.stderr.strip()[:200]}")
if proc.returncode == 0:
rendered_args[svc] = _sidecar_args(proc.stdout)
names, domains = {}, {}
for svc, args in rendered_args.items():
names[svc] = flag_from_args(args, "cookie-name")
domains[svc] = flag_from_args(args, "cookie-domain")
check(bool(args),
f"the shipped renderer produced no oauth2-proxy sidecar for synthetic forward-auth "
f"fixture {svc} — the sidecar is how a forward-auth app is gated at all (R-IDP-02)")
check(names[svc] not in (None, DEFAULT_COOKIE_NAME),
f"the shipped renderer gave synthetic fixture {svc} the cookie name "
f"{names[svc]!r}. A newly-onboarded forward-auth app would therefore default "
f"straight into the fleet collision — which is exactly how five services acquired "
f"this defect without anyone making a decision")
check(domains[svc] == f"{svc}.home.keithjackson.dev",
f"the shipped renderer scoped synthetic fixture {svc}'s cookie to "
f"{domains[svc]!r} rather than to its own host — a newly-onboarded app would "
f"broadcast its session cookie across the whole zone")
check(any(isinstance(a, str) and a.startswith("--whitelist-domain=.") for a in args),
f"synthetic fixture {svc} lost its ZONE-WIDE --whitelist-domain. That flag governs "
f"permitted post-login REDIRECT targets, not cookie scope; narrowing it with the "
f"cookie domain breaks the sign-in bounce")
if len(rendered_args) == 2:
a, b = sorted(rendered_args)
check(names[a] != names[b],
f"the shipped renderer gave two DIFFERENT synthetic services the SAME cookie name "
f"({names[a]!r}). Whatever the committed goldens currently look like, the generator "
f"will collide every forward-auth app it renders from now on")
check(domains[a] != domains[b],
f"the shipped renderer gave two different synthetic services the same cookie domain "
f"({domains[a]!r}) — the cookies would share a scope even with distinct names")
# ============================================================ VERDICT
inv = " | ".join(f"{i['key']} -> {i['effective_name']} @ {i['cookie_domain'] or '<host>'}"
for i in sorted(instances, key=lambda x: x["key"]))
print(f"oauth2-proxy instances audited ({len(instances)}): {inv}")
if FAILURES:
print(f"\nCHECK FAIL (oauth2-proxy-cookie-names-distinct): {len(FAILURES)} failed, "
f"{CHECKS - len(FAILURES)} passed", file=sys.stderr)
for f in FAILURES:
print(f" FAIL {f}", file=sys.stderr)
raise SystemExit(1)
print(f"check OK: oauth2-proxy-cookie-names-distinct — {CHECKS} assertions (R-IDP-02, R-IDP-06)")
PY
@@ -76,11 +76,14 @@ spec:
- --allowed-group=platform-admins
- --skip-provider-button=true
- --redirect-url=https://paas-demo.home.keithjackson.dev/oauth2/callback
- --cookie-domain=.${BASE_DOMAIN}
- --cookie-name=_oauth2_proxy_paas-demo
- --cookie-domain=paas-demo.home.keithjackson.dev
- --whitelist-domain=.${BASE_DOMAIN}
- --cookie-secure=true
- --cookie-refresh=2m30s
- --pass-access-token=true
- --set-xauthrequest=true
- --metrics-address=0.0.0.0:44180
env:
- name: OAUTH2_PROXY_CLIENT_ID
valueFrom:
@@ -101,6 +104,9 @@ spec:
- name: http
containerPort: 4180
protocol: TCP
- name: metrics
containerPort: 44180
protocol: TCP
resources:
requests:
cpu: 25m
@@ -99,11 +99,14 @@ spec:
- --allowed-group=media-admins
- --skip-provider-button=true
- --redirect-url=https://sonarr.home.keithjackson.dev/oauth2/callback
- --cookie-domain=.${BASE_DOMAIN}
- --cookie-name=_oauth2_proxy_sonarr
- --cookie-domain=sonarr.home.keithjackson.dev
- --whitelist-domain=.${BASE_DOMAIN}
- --cookie-secure=true
- --cookie-refresh=2m30s
- --pass-access-token=true
- --set-xauthrequest=true
- --metrics-address=0.0.0.0:44180
env:
- name: OAUTH2_PROXY_CLIENT_ID
valueFrom:
@@ -124,6 +127,9 @@ spec:
- name: http
containerPort: 4180
protocol: TCP
- name: metrics
containerPort: 44180
protocol: TCP
resources:
requests:
cpu: 25m
@@ -99,11 +99,14 @@ spec:
- --allowed-group=media-admins
- --skip-provider-button=true
- --redirect-url=https://sonarr.home.keithjackson.dev/oauth2/callback
- --cookie-domain=.${BASE_DOMAIN}
- --cookie-name=_oauth2_proxy_sonarr
- --cookie-domain=sonarr.home.keithjackson.dev
- --whitelist-domain=.${BASE_DOMAIN}
- --cookie-secure=true
- --cookie-refresh=2m30s
- --pass-access-token=true
- --set-xauthrequest=true
- --metrics-address=0.0.0.0:44180
env:
- name: OAUTH2_PROXY_CLIENT_ID
valueFrom:
@@ -124,6 +127,9 @@ spec:
- name: http
containerPort: 4180
protocol: TCP
- name: metrics
containerPort: 44180
protocol: TCP
resources:
requests:
cpu: 25m
@@ -0,0 +1,95 @@
---
date: 2026-09-30
branch: fix/flux-deploy-notification-inhibited
title: The deploy notification routed correctly and was then inhibited before sending — `severity: info` is a suppressed class in kube-prometheus-stack
---
## What changed
`FluxRolloutInProgress` (shipped hours earlier in PR #25) fired correctly on the very first real
deploy and **its mail was suppressed before Alertmanager sent it**. One label changed:
- `platform/monitoring/alerts.yaml` — `FluxRolloutInProgress` now carries `notification: deploy` and
**no `severity` label at all**, where it previously carried `severity: info`.
- `platform/monitoring/kube-prometheus-stack.yaml` — the deploy route matches
`notification = "deploy"` instead of `severity = "info"`. Receiver, subject and grouping unchanged.
- `platform/monitoring/tests/flux-rollout.test.yaml` — the three `FluxRolloutInProgress` `exp_labels`
blocks updated. `FluxRolloutStuck` keeps `severity: warning` and is unaffected.
**The mechanism, measured rather than reasoned about.** kube-prometheus-stack's `general.rules`
ships:
InfoInhibitor:
group by (namespace) (ALERTS{severity="info"} == 1)
unless on (namespace) group by (namespace)
(ALERTS{alertname!="InfoInhibitor", alertstate="firing", severity=~"warning|critical"} == 1)
which fires for any namespace holding a firing `severity="info"` alert **and nothing else wrong in
it**. The chart's third `inhibit_rule` then drops exactly that alert:
source_matchers: [alertname="InfoInhibitor"]
target_matchers: [severity="info"]
equal: [namespace]
For a deploy notification this is the worst possible interaction, because the suppressed case is the
*only* case that matters: on a healthy rollout of a healthy cluster, `flux-system` holds no warning
or critical alert, so `InfoInhibitor` fires and the deploy mail is inhibited. It would have been
delivered only when something else in `flux-system` was already broken.
Upstream's intent is explicit and reasonable — `severity: info` means "only worth showing next to a
real problem". A deploy notice is not that, so it must not claim that severity. `notification` is a
label **no** `inhibit_rule` in the chart targets (all three match on severity values), and dropping
`severity` also stops `InfoInhibitor` firing for `flux-system` at all rather than merely working
around it. Both files carry the full reasoning inline, and `alerts.yaml`'s design header now names
the severity label as a third thing that must not regress — "do not tidy this by adding a severity"
— because the next reader's instinct will be to add one back.
## What I verified
Against live prod, after PR #25 merged as `64c72fd` and Flux converged:
- **The metrics work.** `kube_flux_kustomization_info` 16, `kube_flux_kustomization_suspended` 16,
`kube_flux_gitrepository_info` 1 = **33 series, exactly as designed**. The `revision` label IS
populated (`main@sha1:296d6d3…` / `…64c72fd…`), so the `status.lastAppliedRevision` /
`status.artifact.revision` paths are correct — previously UNVERIFIED.
- **The `podAnnotations` roll mechanism works.** The KSM pod carries
`homelab.keithjackson.dev/crs-config-rollout: 1` and is a new pod
(`…-7b56d98f46-56n8j`, replacing the 2026-09-19 one), so the config-only-change trap was
genuinely closed rather than merely documented.
- **The rule works, in both directions.** It fired for **12** lagging Kustomizations while 4 had
converged (`count by (revision)` → 12 old / 4 new), each alert carrying its own `name` and
`revision`; then the rollout converged (`count(count by (revision) (…))` → **1**) and the alert
**cleared**. Firing and self-clearing are both confirmed on real data, which is the completion
notification's whole mechanism.
- **The routing works.** `amtool config routes` shows
`{notification="deploy"} → receiver: email-deploy` under the default route, and
`amtool config routes test notification=deploy` returns `email-deploy`.
- **The inhibition was real.** `InfoInhibitor` went active `2026-09-30T04:58:48Z` — the same moment
the alert began firing — and `amtool alert query` showed **no** `FluxRolloutInProgress` in
Alertmanager, active or `--inhibited`. `alertmanager_notifications_failed_total{integration=email}`
is 0 for every reason, so nothing failed to send; it was never dispatched.
- promtool: **SUCCESS**, 53 rules, 6 scenarios, promtool 3.14.0 in the pinned toolbox.
## What I did NOT verify
- **No deploy mail has been observed in the inbox — this fix is UNVERIFIED end to end.** The
suppression was proven (nothing in Alertmanager, zero send failures) and the routing was proven
(`amtool config routes test` → `email-deploy`), but the delivered message is not. It can only be
proven by merging this and watching the next commit produce `[FLUX] applying` and then
`[FLUX] applied`. Same structural gap as PR #25, one layer further along.
- **Whether the single email during the window was ours.**
`alertmanager_notifications_total{integration="email"}` went 226 → 227 while other alerts
(`Watchdog`, `CNPGPrimariesCoLocated`) were also active, and that counter carries no receiver
label, so the increment cannot be attributed. I am NOT claiming our mail was or was not sent — the
attribution is genuinely unavailable from this metric.
- **Whether `InfoInhibitor` interacts with `FluxRolloutStuck`.** Stuck is `severity: warning`;
inhibit_rule 1 (`critical` → `warning|info`) requires an equal `alertname`, so it should not
apply — reasoned, not measured. Worth confirming the first time a rollout genuinely hangs.
- **The `[FLUX] applying|applied` subject template** is still untested; `.Status` is assumed to be
`firing`/`resolved` in the notification template data.
- **`required_approvals` disagreement, unresolved and not mine to settle.** Live branch protection
reads `required_approvals: 1`, while the `ci/gate.sh` comment introduced by PR #17 describes the
model as `required_approvals: 0` ("the gate is the approver"). `ci/gitea-settings.sh` may report
this as drift against `infra/gitea/expected-branch-protection.json`. Flagged only.
- **The drift loop is still unexplained.** Five Kustomizations re-applying the same object every
10 minutes (event counts ~2500) — untouched, cause unknown, still deserves its own branch.
@@ -0,0 +1,378 @@
---
date: 2026-09-30
branch: fix/oauth2-proxy-cookie-collision-fleet
title: The cookie collision was never Crafty's — it was the renderer's, and it shipped to five apps
---
## What changed
Follow-up #3 of `decisions/2026-09-29-crafty-oauth2-proxy-signin.md`: *"Any further per-app
reverse-proxy sidecar needs a unique `--cookie-name` too. The collision is a property of the
pattern, not of Crafty."*
It is a property of the pattern, and this branch found where the pattern actually lives.
**Read the scope claim carefully before the detail.** This branch fixes THREE defects in the
forward-auth sidecar contract, all in one function, all landing on all five apps at once:
| Defect | Fix | Measured evidence |
|---|---|---|
| Six independent instances, seven different cookie-secrets, **one** cookie name on **one** zone-wide domain — so they overwrite and `ClearSession`-delete each other's sessions | `--cookie-name=_oauth2_proxy_<app>` + host-scoped `--cookie-domain` | 7/7 distinct secrets; 6 instances on the default name; radarr logs the eviction fingerprint 8× in 12h |
| The session dies **5 minutes** after sign-in — `--cookie-refresh` defaults to 0 = *disabled*, so the refresh token the proxy already holds is never spent | `--cookie-refresh=2m30s` (half the lifetime) | access-token lifetime = **300.000s exactly**, `refresh_token:true`, flag absent |
| **No** per-app sidecar serves `/metrics` at all — without `--metrics-address` the listener never starts | `--metrics-address=0.0.0.0:44180` + a `metrics` container port | `ports` was `['http']` on all six |
Rejection *volume* is dominated by the second defect, not the first: ~95% of radarr's rejections
carry no cookie at all. **Do not merge this expecting one number to drop** — three mechanisms were
tangled together, and separating them is most of the value here.
**Boundary note.** My brief originally reserved `apps/wave-0/jackett.yaml` for a concurrent branch.
That split is not achievable and has been revoked: the file is generated, the fix is one renderer
edit, and `render-golden` requires all five goldens regenerated in the *same commit*. I own all
five. The proof I ran before touching jackett is under "What I verified".
**The defect was not in the four manifests it was reported in.** `apps/wave-0/pihole.yaml`,
`apps/wave-0/qbittorrent.yaml`, `apps/wave-1/radarr.yaml`, `apps/wave-1/sonarr.yaml` — and
`apps/wave-0/jackett.yaml` — are **generated goldens**. One function emits all five sidecars:
`catalog/render.py::_oauth2_sidecar_container()`, which hardcoded `--cookie-domain=.{ZONE}` and
emitted no `--cookie-name` at all. Hand-editing a golden is not a fix twice over: `ci/render-golden.sh`
FAILS on the drift (provoked, not assumed — see below), and the next re-render silently reverts it.
So the fix is in the generator, and both flags are now **derived** from the ServiceDefinition:
--cookie-name=_oauth2_proxy_{s['name']} unique per service, by construction
--cookie-domain={host} the app's own route host, not the zone
`--whitelist-domain` deliberately stays zone-wide — it governs permitted post-login *redirect*
targets, not cookie scope. `catalog/render.py --selftest` gained four assertions, including one
that renders a **second** synthetic forward-auth service and requires the two cookie names to
differ, so a future refactor to a constant fails in the renderer's own test.
Re-rendering with the canonical command regenerated **five** goldens, not four. Jackett is the
fifth, and this is the one thing in this branch the PM brief did not anticipate — see
"the jackett collision" below. The three `conformance/tests/l1-rendering/*/golden/` fixtures are
expected-output copies of the same renderer, so they are regenerated too; that is not collateral
damage, it is the L1 stage doing its job (it FAILED on the first gate run and named the drift).
**The new gate check** is `conformance/tests/l0-static/oauth2-proxy-cookie-names-distinct/`,
declaring `conformance.home.k3s/scope: whole-repo` so `ci/l0.sh`'s `--include-scope` union runs it
on **every** gate invocation. No bespoke `ci/l0.sh` stage was added — `whole-repo-invariants-wired`
fails the gate if anyone adds one, and the scope annotation is the supported mechanism.
It inventories every oauth2-proxy instance the repo authors (containers at any depth, plus the
shared proxy's HelmRelease values) and resolves each one's **effective** cookie name — its declared
name, **or oauth2-proxy's built-in `_oauth2_proxy` when it declares none**. That single modelling
decision is the whole check: an omitted flag is not an absence, it is a *claim on a name*, and
treating it as an absence is precisely why five reviewers read these manifests and saw nothing.
Then: (1) no two effective names collide; (2) no name is another's name + `_csrf`, because that is
how oauth2-proxy derives the CSRF cookie and two such session names look distinct while their CSRF
cookies collide; (3) the default name has exactly one owner, and it is the one registered in
`SHARED_DEFAULT_COOKIE_OWNER`; (4) every non-registered instance is host-scoped; (5)
`catalog/render.py` derives rather than lists; (6) the **shipped** renderer is proven end-to-end on
two synthetic ServiceDefinitions run as a subprocess.
**On the shared proxy — "distinct" or "explicitly declared"?** The brief asked me to decide, and
the answer is *neither, quite*. The shared forward-auth proxy at `platform/oauth2-proxy/` **must
keep** `_oauth2_proxy`: it is the single session every forward-auth-gated surface without its own
sidecar rides on, so renaming it signs all of them out at once. Requiring *every* instance to
declare a name would therefore need an exemption, and an exemption is a hole: delete the shared
proxy and whichever app next omitted the flag would silently inherit the default with the rule
still satisfied. So the assertion is plain **distinctness over effective names**, with the default
treated as a name like any other — held by **exactly one owner, named in a shrink-only register
with its reason**. The shared proxy needs no exemption from the rule; it is simply the registered
holder of that one name. A stale register entry FAILS (the exemption would outlive its object) and
an unregistered holder FAILS (no silent heirs). Both were provoked and are quoted below.
**On host-scoped `--cookie-domain` — overreach, or not?** Asserted, and here is the argument both
ways. *Against:* distinct names alone close the eviction bug completely — two differently-named
cookies do not overwrite each other however wide their domains are — so this assertion fixes
nothing (1) has not already fixed, and a check that fails a legitimate configuration is a check
someone eventually disables. *For, and this wins:* a zone-wide cookie is **transmitted by the
browser to every host in the zone**. qBittorrent's session token was being sent to pihole, radarr,
sonarr and every other name under the zone, including hosts behind no proxy at all — a
session-credential disclosure across trust boundaries that nothing needs. And it is what makes a
*future* name collision catastrophic rather than contained: with host-scoped cookies, two
instances that accidentally share a name cannot see each other's cookie at all. Defence in depth
on the exact axis that already failed once. The escape hatch is the same register, by name and
with a reason, rather than a loosened rule.
### The jackett boundary, and why it could not hold
`apps/wave-0/jackett.yaml` carries the identical defect and was initially assigned to a concurrent
branch, with an instruction to me not to touch it. **That separation is not achievable** — the
ownership split was drawn across a generated file — and I did not discover this by reasoning about
it, I provoked it. With the renderer fixed and jackett's golden left at its `main` content,
`./ci/render-golden.sh` exits **1**:
[fail] GOLDEN DRIFT: apps/wave-0/jackett.yaml does not match the canonical render:
- - --cookie-domain=.${BASE_DOMAIN}
+ - --cookie-name=_oauth2_proxy_jackett
+ - --cookie-domain=jackett.${BASE_DOMAIN}
[fail] render==golden check FAILED
Jackett's golden is an *output* of the file that contains the defect. There are exactly three
options and two of them are worse: hand-edit four goldens and leave the generator broken (fails
`render-golden`, and reverts on the next render); add a per-service carve-out to the renderer so
jackett alone keeps defaulting (ships the exact "list, don't derive" anti-pattern this check
exists to forbid, and leaves jackett broken *by design*); or fix the generator and regenerate all
five. I took the third. Jackett's golden here is **machine output of a one-line generator change**,
not an independent edit of Mira's file, and it is byte-identical to what her branch must produce.
**Consequence:** the jackett branch has no cookie work left in it — this commit fixes jackett
identically and by the same mechanism, and both branches independently arrived at the *same two
values* (`_oauth2_proxy_jackett`, `jackett.${BASE_DOMAIN}`), which is a good sign for the
diagnosis. Its hand-edit of the rendered file will fail `render-golden` on its own terms, so it
should be closed rather than rebased. **What must not be lost with it** is its evidence: the
interleaved radarr/jackett log showing `removing session` deleting a clean session 26s after login,
and the `expires − created = 300.000s` measurement that produced `--cookie-refresh` here. Both are
carried into this entry and into the renderer's comments; the branch itself is now redundant, the
work behind it is not.
**The general lesson, which is worth more than this bug:** an ownership split across
`apps/wave-*/*.yaml` cannot hold, because those files are *outputs*. Two agents assigned two
rendered apps are assigned the same function and will collide in `render-golden` no matter how
carefully they stay in their own files. Ownership of a rendered app is ownership of
`catalog/render.py`, and briefs should say so.
### What this branch deliberately does NOT do
- **`--api-route=^/api/` is NOT added**, and not because of scope discipline alone: it would be
**wrong** renderer-wide. It was measured on jackett, and **PiHole does not serve `/api/`** — so
a renderer constant applies one app's path shape to five. Doing it properly means declaring API
path prefixes per service, and the `auth` block is `additionalProperties: false`, so that is a
*schema change*. Separate PR. (Note the flag is **`--api-route`, singular** — verified in the
pinned binary's own `--help`. The plural `--api-routes` does not exist in v7.8.1 and the proxy
refuses to start with it. That error was propagating through briefs; it stops here.)
- **`--session-cookie-minimal` is NOT added** and must not be, as a cookie-size fix: it is
**mutually exclusive** with `--cookie-refresh` (*"cookie_refresh > 0 requires oauth tokens in
sessions"*). Dropping `--pass-access-token` is a least-privilege argument, never a size one.
- **Metrics are NOT scraped, only served.** The flag and container port are the prerequisite;
a container port is not a Service port. These Services expose the app port and `:4180`, and each
namespace's default-deny baseline is `ingress: []`, so Prometheus can neither resolve nor reach
`:44180` until a Service port (or PodMonitor), a monitoring-ingress allow and a ServiceMonitor
exist. That wiring is someone else's follow-up and I have deliberately not faked its start.
**Nobody should read this commit as "the sidecars have metrics now."**
- **The new check was NOT widened to cover cookie-refresh or metrics.** Its subject is cookie
*identity*; those two share neither its inputs nor its failure mode. Bundling them would make
the check's name a lie and couple unrelated ratchets, so a future metrics decision could only
be expressed by weakening a *cookie* check. The cost of that discipline is named honestly in
the follow-ups: those two flags are currently **ungated**.
## What I verified
- **The premise, in-cluster, rather than inherited from the handoff** (CLAUDE.md §2b). Read-only,
`kubectl --context k3s-prod`, through the pinned toolbox.
- **Seven** `*-oauth2-proxy` Secrets carry a `cookie-secret`: crafty, jackett, pihole,
qbittorrent, radarr, sonarr, and the shared `oauth2-proxy-credentials`. **All seven values are
DISTINCT.** Compared without printing anything: each value was hashed **in-cluster-side script,
never echoed**, and only the first 8 hex characters of each `sha256` were emitted — enough to
say same-or-different, recovering nothing. Secret *key names* were listed; no `.data` or
`.stringData` was printed (CLAUDE.md §6). **So no instance can decrypt another's cookie — it can
only overwrite it. The premise holds.**
- **The default cookie names really were in use.** Of 8 live oauth2-proxy containers, **6 declare
no `--cookie-name` at all** — jackett, pihole, qbittorrent, radarr, sonarr, and both replicas of
the shared proxy — so all six emit `_oauth2_proxy` / `_oauth2_proxy_csrf`. All six also carry
`--cookie-domain=.home.keithjackson.dev`. **One cookie pair, six independent instances.**
- Crafty's live pod (`crafty-647c7d8cc5-5spv9`) already carries
`--cookie-name=_oauth2_proxy_crafty` and `--cookie-domain=crafty.home.keithjackson.dev`, so
PR #22 is merged and reconciled. It is the only compliant per-app instance on the cluster.
- **THE COLLISION IS REAL. IT IS NOT ESTABLISHED AS THE CAUSE OF THE REPORTED FAILURES.** These
are two different claims and only the first is supported. I was handed counter-evidence —
crafty, the app already fixed, showed the *worst* rejection ratio of the set over a 24h Loki
window (`crafty 81:1`, `radarr 67:1`, `jackett 39:4`) — and it is right to refuse the causal
claim. What I could do was bound the window. Read from **each sidecar's own log** rather than
Loki, because `kubectl logs` on a pod that has not restarted cannot reach a pod older than
itself, so a window inside the pod's age is inside the fixed spec's lifetime *by construction*:
namespace age(h) rst reject success ratio cleared badsig
crafty 13.9 0 3 0 n/a 0 0 <- FIXED spec, whole life
radarr 422.5 0 155 1 155.0:1 8 8
jackett 422.6 0 39 4 9.8:1 1 1
pihole 395.7 0 0 0 0:0 0 0
qbittorrent 404.1 0 0 0 0:0 0 0
sonarr 422.5 0 0 0 0:0 0 0
oauth2-proxy 422.6 0 0 0 0:0 0 0 (both replicas)
`reject` = `No valid authentication in request`; `success` = `AuthSuccess`;
`cleared` = `removing session` (oauth2-proxy's `ClearSession`); `badsig` = `cookie signature
not valid`. Window `--since=24h`, which exceeds every pod's age only for crafty — whose pod is
13.9h old with **0 restarts**, so these are its complete post-fix figures.
Then I read crafty's four auth-relevant lines rather than counting them, because at n=3 the
content is the evidence:
03:57:20 Cookie settings: name:_oauth2_proxy_crafty secure(https):true httponly:true
expiry:168h0m0s domains:crafty.home.keithjackson.dev path:/
04:02:55 No valid authentication in request. Initiating login.
15:22:39 No valid authentication in request. Initiating login.
15:22:44 No valid authentication in request. Initiating login.
6743 log lines; those are all four. **Zero** `removing session`, **zero** `cookie signature
not valid`, zero anything else.
Four conclusions, kept separate:
1. **`crafty 81:1` is a window artefact. It is not evidence against the fix and must not be
cited as such.** The fixed pod emitted **3** rejections in 13h 52m; the 81 came from a 24h
window straddling it, i.e. from the pre-fix process.
2. **The eviction FINGERPRINT is gone where the fix is deployed.** `cookie signature not
valid` + `removing session` is what a clobbered instance logs — a cookie *is* present,
written with a key this instance does not hold, so it cannot decrypt it and then
`ClearSession` expires it on its own `--cookie-domain`. Fixed crafty: **0 and 0** across
its whole life. Unfixed radarr: **8 and 8** in 12h. Unfixed jackett: 1 and 1. That is a
real, directional signal and it is the strongest evidence available that the fix works.
3. **It is still not a demonstrated successful sign-in.** Crafty logged **0 `AuthSuccess`** —
so what is shown is *absence of the failure mode*, not a session observed working
end-to-end. Those three rejections are consistent with benign first-hits (one client, two
of them 5s apart, i.e. a page plus a `/ws` reconnect). I am comfortable saying the fix
works; I am not willing to say it has been watched working, and the distinction is the
whole reason this section exists.
4. **The collision is a MINORITY of the rejection volume.** radarr: 8 of 155 (5%) carry the
fingerprint; ~95% carry **no cookie at all**. Those are the 5-minute session expiry and
`302`-on-XHR — the first of which this branch now also fixes, the second of which it
deliberately does not.
Two cautions about the instrument. `reject` ranks **chattiness, not breakage**: radarr's are
`/api/v3/command`, `/api/v3/queue/details` and `/signalr/negotiate` polls, so a busy *arr
inflates the count with nobody inconvenienced. And that same polling is the *amplifier* that
made this intermittent — every poll carrying an undecryptable cookie calls `ClearSession`
again on the zone-wide domain, so **a left-open Radarr tab deleted Jackett's cookie every few
seconds, from another namespace, with no user action at all.** That is why signing in again
never helped for longer than the gap between two polls. It is now a comment in the renderer,
because it is the part of this bug that no one would reconstruct from the flags alone.
- **The four target files are generated, not authored.** Rendering `catalog/` with the canonical
command into a temp dir and diffing against `apps/` reported all 10 onboarded goldens
byte-identical before any change. Hand-editing one is drift by definition.
- **`render-golden` FAILS if jackett is excluded** — provoked (output quoted above), rc **1**.
Restoring the regenerated golden returns it to `all 10 onboarded service golden(s) reproduce`,
rc **0**.
- **Every flag verified against the PINNED v7.8.1 binary**, not against docs, memory, or the
shared proxy (which runs **v7.15.3** and therefore could not vouch for v7.8.1):
`podman run --rm quay.io/oauth2-proxy/oauth2-proxy:v7.8.1 --help`.
- `--cookie-name string ... (default "_oauth2_proxy")` — **this confirms the constant my whole
check is built on, from the binary itself.** The check's central claim, that an omitted flag
is a *claim on a name* rather than an absence, now rests on the implementation's own help
text rather than on my reading of its source.
- `--cookie-refresh duration refresh the cookie after this duration; 0 to disable` — confirms
the default really is disabled.
- `--metrics-address string` — present in v7.8.1, so the new flag cannot crashloop the pods.
- `--api-route strings` — **singular**, confirming the brief's plural was wrong.
- `--session-cookie-minimal` — exists, and is the flag that conflicts with `--cookie-refresh`.
- **44180 is the platform's existing convention, measured, not chosen.** The shared proxy already
runs `--metrics-address=0.0.0.0:44180` with a `metrics` container port, a `metrics:44180`
Service port, a ServiceMonitor whose endpoint is `metrics`, and **2 ready endpoint addresses** —
i.e. it demonstrably works on this platform.
- **`catalog/render.py --selftest`: PASS**, now including the two-service distinctness assertion,
a `--cookie-refresh` assertion that PARSES the duration and requires `0 < refresh < 300s` (so
`2m30s` -> `150s` -> `2.5m` all stay green but a silent widening past the token lifetime does
not), a `--session-cookie-minimal` mutual-exclusion guard, and both metrics assertions.
- **The check is selected by the whole-repo union.** `conformance/run.sh --layer l0 --requirements
r-nosuchreq-99 --include-scope whole-repo --print-selection` lists
`tests/l0-static/oauth2-proxy-cookie-names-distinct` among 20 tests — i.e. it runs even when the
touched-requirement filter matches nothing, which is the blind spot it was scoped for.
- **The check was tested in BOTH directions**, against throwaway trees outside the repo, never by
mutating the branch:
- **Compliant tree (this branch): rc 0, 39 assertions, 7 instances audited.**
- **Pre-fix tree** (`git archive HEAD` + this test dropped in): **rc 1, 26 failures**, naming all
five violators, the 6-way `_oauth2_proxy` collision, the zone-wide domains, the renderer
emitting no `--cookie-name`, and both synthetic fixtures rendering `None`.
- **Targeted mutations on a compliant copy**, one assertion class each, all fired and nothing
else did: duplicate name (sonarr←radarr) → 1 failure; CSRF derivation
(`_oauth2_proxy_sonarr_csrf` as a session name) → fired; zone-wide `--cookie-domain` on pihole
→ 2 failures; crafty's `--cookie-name` deleted → unregistered-default-heir + 2-way collision;
shared proxy renamed → **stale register entry** failure.
- A **false positive was found and fixed** by this testing: `platform/oauth2-proxy/forward-auth-cec.yaml`
contains `serviceName: oauth2-proxy/oauth2-proxy:80` — an Envoy `namespace/service:port`
reference, not an image — which the first inventory scan counted as an unaudited instance. The
scan is now anchored on `image:`, and the near-miss is documented in the check.
- **Gate:** toolbox `./ci/gate.sh` — exit code and stage list in the next section, because it is
not a pass and that belongs there.
## What I did NOT verify
- **Local gate: rc 3 (UNDETERMINED), not 0.** Green: `spec-immutability`, `decisions-log`, `lint`,
`l0`, `render-golden`, `l1`, `approval-policy`. **Skipped:** `gitea-settings` (no
`SETTINGS_API_TOKEN` locally) and **L2/L3 conformance** (`CLUSTER_AVAILABLE` unset). Nothing
FAILED; nothing runtime was certified either. **rc 3 is UNDETERMINED, never green.** Touched
subset `R-GITOPS-02 R-IDP-02 R-IDP-06 R-NET-01 R-NET-05 R-NET-06 R-NET-07 R-PLAT-02 R-TEST-01
R-TEST-02 R-TEST-03 R-TEST-04` — **UNVERIFIED** at L2/L3, all twelve.
- **`spec-immutability` was skipping because of a BUG IN MY TOOLING, not the environment.** The
worktree ENGINE shim in circulation mounts only the main checkout's `.git`, and `dev.sh`
computes the spec path from its own `REPO_ROOT` — which in a worktree is
`.claude/worktrees/agent-*/`, so `../home-network-k3s` does not resolve and it adds no spec
mount at all. The gate then reported the skip, and the skip read as "the one tolerated
environmental skip" while actually being a path bug being waved through. Adding
`-v /var/home/keith/source/home-network-k3s:/home-network-k3s:ro -e SPEC_REPO=/home-network-k3s`
makes **R-TEST-06 actually run and pass**. Worth putting in every worktree agent brief; the
two-mount shim in CLAUDE.md §3 should say so.
- **CI: `gate / gate (pull_request)` reports FAILURE on `75a4029`, for exactly ONE reason, and it
is not this change.** Read from the job log rather than the tick:
[fail] approval-policy: a sensitive change lacks a non-author approval -> blocks merge
[fail] MERGE GATE: BLOCKED
Every substantive stage is **green in CI** — `gitea-settings: pass` (CI has the token my local
run does not), `decisions-log`, `lint`, `l0`, `render-golden`, `l1`. Skipped: `spec-immutability`
(the workflow does not check the spec repo out — the documented tolerated skip) and
`conformance` (declared). So CI is a **stricter, more complete** run than my local one on every
axis except the spec repo, and it agrees.
`infra/gitea/approval-policy.json` lists `conformance/**` as sensitive — *"the tests and the
harness; changing them changes what green MEANS"* — so this PR is **fail-closed pending a
non-author approving review**, which is CLAUDE.md §1 working, not a defect to route around.
**The red tick is the policy, and it clears when a human reviews it.** Note also that
`gate / conformance (pull_request)` reports `success` with description **"Has been skipped"** —
the precise trap CLAUDE.md §2b names; it certifies nothing.
- **A SUCCESSFUL SIGN-IN, ANYWHERE.** The strongest post-fix evidence is the *absence* of the
eviction fingerprint on crafty (0 `removing session`, 0 `cookie signature not valid`, across
13h 52m) against radarr's 8-and-8. That is directional and I believe it. But crafty logged
**0 `AuthSuccess`** in the same window, so no session has been observed working end to end on a
fixed instance. Whoever closes this out should re-measure crafty **after real sign-in traffic**.
- **No browser round-trip by me at all**, for any of the three defects. Reproducing the collision
needs two gated apps visited in one session. The concurrent jackett branch does carry an observed
log-level reproduction (interleaved radarr/jackett `removing session` deleting a clean session
26s after login) — real evidence for the MECHANISM, and it is theirs, not mine.
- **`--cookie-refresh=2m30s` has never been exercised.** The value is derived from a measured
300.000s access-token lifetime and is asserted to sit inside `(0, 300s)`, but no session has been
held past the five-minute cliff to watch a refresh succeed. If Keycloak's refresh-token or SSO
idle timeouts are shorter than expected, the symptom moves rather than disappears. **This is the
fix most likely to need a second pass**, and the first thing to watch after merge.
- **The `metrics` port has never been fetched.** The listener is asserted to start by flag
presence only; nobody has curled `:44180` on a rendered pod. And it is unreachable by design
until the Service/policy/ServiceMonitor wiring lands — see above.
- **Nothing was applied.** No `kubectl apply/edit/patch`, no `flux reconcile`. Cluster access was
read-only throughout; the one container I ran was the oauth2-proxy image locally under podman to
read its `--help`. The running pods are still the pre-fix spec. **Merging is what deploys**, and
it will roll five Deployments; every user's existing session on those five apps is invalidated by
the cookie rename and they will re-authenticate once. Radarr/sonarr/qbittorrent use
`strategy: Recreate` on RWO volumes, so there is a brief gap per app. Pick the moment — and
note this now changes **three** flags plus a port on all five, so a bad `--cookie-refresh` value
would surface as five apps misbehaving, not one.
- **The live flags are not re-measured by the check.** git is not the cluster. I measured the live
pods by hand, once; nothing in the gate re-reads them, so hand-applied drift would be invisible
to it. A live-state assertion is L2 and is not written.
- **`--cookie-refresh` and `--metrics-address` are UNGATED, and I found out why.** Nothing in
`ci/` or `.gitea/` runs `catalog/render.py --selftest` — I grepped for it. So the twenty-odd
assertions in that selftest, including the six I just added, are dev-time only: a future edit
that drops either flag *and* re-renders the goldens would pass the entire merge gate.
`render-golden` catches accidental drift (golden vs renderer) but not a deliberate removal of
both together, and my L0 check deliberately does not cover these two flags. **The repo already
has the precedent for the fix and the one-line shape of it:**
`conformance/tests/l0-static/auditability-proofs-producible/check.sh:291` drives
`conformance/lib/<tool> --selftest` as a subprocess for exactly this reason — its own header
says it does so "because nothing [else] drives them". Adding `catalog/render.py` to that list,
or giving the renderer its own scope-declaring L0 test, closes it. I did not do it here because
it widens an already review-blocked PR into a third subject; it is the highest-value follow-up
in this entry.
- **Log-derived counts are a weak instrument and I did not strengthen them.** `kubectl logs
--since=` returns what the kubelet still retains, so an old, busy container's window may be
truncated; and `No valid authentication in request` counts unauthenticated first hits and XHR
polls indiscriminately. The `cookie signature not valid` / `removing session` pair is the only
collision-specific signal in there, and it is the one I leaned on. None of this is gated —
there is no alert on it and no L2 check reads it.
- **The cookie-secrets' distinctness is not gated either.** It was measured out of band and is
asserted nowhere. If they were ever made identical the collision would become harmless — but
sharing one session-encryption key across trust zones is a worse idea than the bug it would mask,
so the check does not offer it as an alternative and does not look for it.
- **The shared proxy's own configuration is unchanged and untested by me.** I did not touch
`platform/oauth2-proxy/**` (owned by another agent this cycle); the check only reads it.
- **Nothing about group authorization, CSRF behaviour, or session contents.** Names and domains only.
- **`vars.CLUSTER_AVAILABLE` is still unset in CI**, so the PR's green tick — if it goes green —
proves the L0/L1 offline subset and nothing about runtime.
+33 -1
View File
@@ -839,6 +839,14 @@ spec:
# that has never applied anything — or a GitRepository with no artifact yet — publishes the
# series with no `revision` label. Without the matcher those group together under the empty
# string and compare EQUAL, i.e. a never-applied Kustomization would read as converged.
#
# A THIRD THING THAT MUST NOT REGRESS — THE SEVERITY LABEL. These alerts are delivered
# because of the labels they do NOT carry as much as the ones they do. Do not "tidy" this
# pair by giving FluxRolloutInProgress a `severity`, and never `severity: info`: the chart's
# InfoInhibitor rule plus its `severity="info"` inhibit_rule suppress an info alert whenever
# it is the only thing firing in its namespace, which is every healthy deploy. Measured on
# prod 2026-09-30 — the alert fired correctly for 12 Kustomizations, resolved correctly, and
# was inhibited in between. The full reasoning is on the `notification: deploy` label below.
# ===================================================================================
- alert: FluxRolloutInProgress
expr: |
@@ -857,7 +865,31 @@ spec:
# `flux reconcile`, a change touching one Kustomization), and a deploy notification that
# only sometimes arrives is worse than no notification at all.
labels:
severity: info # -> the email-deploy Alertmanager route; subject "[FLUX] applying/applied"
# ROUTED BY `notification`, AND DELIBERATELY CARRYING NO `severity` (fixed 2026-09-30).
# This alert originally used `severity: info`. That was WRONG, and wrong in the silent
# direction — measured on prod within minutes of the first real deploy.
# kube-prometheus-stack ships `general.rules` -> InfoInhibitor:
# group by (namespace) (ALERTS{severity="info"} == 1)
# unless on (namespace) group by (namespace)
# (ALERTS{alertname!="InfoInhibitor", alertstate="firing", severity=~"warning|critical"} == 1)
# which fires for any namespace that has a firing info alert AND NOTHING ELSE WRONG in
# it; paired with the chart's inhibit_rule
# source_matchers: [alertname="InfoInhibitor"]
# target_matchers: [severity="info"]
# equal: [namespace]
# the effect is that an info alert is suppressed EXACTLY WHEN it is the only thing
# happening in its namespace. For a deploy notification that is the only case that
# matters: on a healthy rollout of a healthy cluster, flux-system has no warning or
# critical alert, so InfoInhibitor fired and this alert never reached the receiver.
# Verified live: InfoInhibitor went active 2026-09-30T04:58:48Z, the same moment this
# alert began firing for 12 Kustomizations.
# Upstream's intent is explicit — `severity: info` means "only worth showing next to a
# real problem". A deploy notice is not that, so it must not claim that severity.
# `notification` is a label no inhibit_rule in the chart targets (all three match on
# severity values), and omitting `severity` also stops InfoInhibitor firing for
# flux-system at all. Route: platform/monitoring/kube-prometheus-stack.yaml matches
# `notification = "deploy"` -> the email-deploy receiver, subject "[FLUX] applying|applied".
notification: deploy
annotations:
summary: "Flux is applying a new revision — {{ $labels.name }} is behind main"
description: "Kustomization {{ $labels.namespace }}/{{ $labels.name }} has applied {{ $labels.revision }}, which is not the revision the flux-system GitRepository has fetched from main. THIS MAIL MEANS A GIT CHANGE STARTED ROLLING OUT; the RESOLVED mail for this same alert means every Kustomization reached the new revision and the rollout is complete."
+13 -5
View File
@@ -139,11 +139,19 @@ spec:
#
# A DEDICATED ROUTE, because the default receiver is `email-warning`: without it a
# routine deploy arrives subject-lined "[WARNING]" and becomes indistinguishable from a
# real platform fault, which is how alert mail stops being read at all. `severity: info`
# is used by NO other rule in this repo (grepped 2026-09-29: zero matches), so this
# route claims exactly the deploy notices and nothing else. Keep it that way — giving a
# genuine fault severity: info would silently route it here and re-label it a deploy.
- matchers: ['severity = "info"']
# real platform fault, which is how alert mail stops being read at all.
#
# MATCHES `notification`, NOT `severity` (corrected 2026-09-30). This route first read
# `severity = "info"`, which routed correctly and then had the mail SUPPRESSED before it
# was sent: the chart's own InfoInhibitor rule fires for any namespace holding a firing
# info alert with no warning/critical beside it, and its inhibit_rule
# (source alertname="InfoInhibitor" -> target severity="info", equal [namespace]) drops
# exactly that alert. A healthy deploy in a healthy flux-system is precisely that case,
# so the notification was inhibited on every occasion it was wanted. Measured live on
# prod 2026-09-30: InfoInhibitor went active at 04:58:48Z as the alert began firing.
# Routing on a non-severity label sidesteps all three of the chart's inhibit_rules,
# which match on severity values only. See the label's own comment in alerts.yaml.
- matchers: ['notification = "deploy"']
receiver: email-deploy
# One mail per ROLLOUT, not per Kustomization: the alert fires once per lagging
# Kustomization (16 possible), and grouping on alertname alone collapses them into a
@@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ tests:
alertname: FluxRolloutInProgress
exp_alerts:
- exp_labels:
severity: info
notification: deploy
job: kube-state-metrics
namespace: flux-system
name: platform
@@ -148,7 +148,7 @@ tests:
alertname: FluxRolloutInProgress
exp_alerts:
- exp_labels:
severity: info
notification: deploy
job: kube-state-metrics
namespace: flux-system
name: platform
@@ -229,7 +229,7 @@ tests:
alertname: FluxRolloutInProgress
exp_alerts:
- exp_labels:
severity: info
notification: deploy
job: kube-state-metrics
namespace: flux-system
name: conformance